https://arxiv.org/api/KGSORZYItdm8xNjiqDJea6YePbo 2026-06-21T12:46:08Z 4059 165 15 http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.25131v1 2026-05-24T15:21:21Z

Parties in spatial competition rarely choose platforms that reverse their ideological order. Mutual leapfrogging is the strongest form of reversal: each party locates beyond the other party's ideal point. In voting models without abstention single-peakedness rules out such reversals. We show that this conclusion does not survive endogenous abstention. There is a spatial voting model in which voter and party preferences are single-peaked, yet mutual leapfrogging occurs in pure-strategy equilibrium. The equilibrium survives because some deviations change which voters participate. We prove that such equilibria are impossible under a sufficient ordinal condition: parties agree on how to rank leftward and rightward deviations from their ideal points. The condition is general enough to cover symmetric single-peaked utilities and common translated utility shapes.

2026-05-24T15:21:21Z 7 pages Aman Ray Srikanth B. Pai http://arxiv.org/abs/2110.07024v2 2026-05-24T14:49:47Z

This paper establishes non-asymptotic convergence of the cutoffs in Random serial dictatorship in an environment with many students, many schools, and arbitrary student preferences. Convergence is shown to hold when the number of schools, $m$, and the number of students, $n$, satisfy the relation $m \ln m \ll n$, and we provide an example showing that this result is sharp. We differ significantly from prior work in the mechanism design literature in our use of analytic tools from randomized algorithms and discrete probability, which allow us to show concentration of the RSD lottery probabilities and cutoffs even against adversarial student preferences.

2021-10-13T20:50:23Z This paper contains a critical error in Theorem 1 and Proposition 2 Suhas Vijaykumar http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.22987v3 2026-05-24T04:51:15Z

Public delay can be informative when the existence, custodian, and review dates of hard evidence are observed. I study a disclosure protocol in which a sealed record is docketed, held by a public custodian, and revealed only at terminal disclosure. At each review, retention is not silence: it rules out the states in which the holder would have relayed or disclosed. This censoring event yields an exact Bayesian filter. Under interval strategies, the public posterior is summarized by finitely many support endpoints. A compact reputation benchmark verifies Markov perfect Bayesian equilibria with such strategies and gives finite time resolution on compact unresolved slices. With two certified routes for the same record, retention on one route changes what remains feasible on the other before it acts. Common record censoring creates network value that pairwise formation can miss.

2025-12-28T16:09:50Z revised version: 44 pp. main + 28 pp. supplementary OA (+ code used to generate the figure in the OA) I. Sebastian Buhai http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.21155v3 2026-05-24T01:58:42Z

We employ the consistency principle to evaluate core concepts in an indivisible object allocation model with intricate co-ownership. In this environment, the strong core is consistent but may be empty, the weak core is nonempty but neither consistent nor Pareto efficient, and the exclusion core introduced by Balbuzanov and Kotowski (2019), although nonempty and Pareto efficient, fails consistency. We introduce the concept of refined exclusion core that preserves the exclusion-rights approach while restoring consistency. The refined exclusion core eliminates unreasonable allocations admitted by the exclusion core and delivers sharper predictions than existing alternatives.

2025-11-26T08:15:24Z Jun Zhang http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.21158v4 2026-05-24T01:49:46Z

We study core concepts in the Shapley-Scarf housing market model under unrestricted weak preferences. Among standard concepts, the strong core may be empty while the nonempty weak core may contain Pareto inefficient allocations. We propose the rectified strong core by adding a single condition: an unaffected agent may join a blocking coalition only if every object he views as indifferent to his current assignment is owned by the coalition. The rectified strong core is always nonempty and Pareto efficient, lies between the weak and strong cores, and coincides with the strong core whenever the latter is nonempty. This condition is the most permissive admissibility requirement for unaffected blocking agents that guarantees nonemptiness, and extends the behavioral foundation of the strong core to weak preferences.

2025-11-26T08:18:07Z Substantial revision Jun Zhang http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.24730v1 2026-05-23T20:48:36Z

Strategic communication often relies on anchors observed by the sender but not by the receiver. An analyst may report against a proprietary valuation model, an auditor against an internal score, a manager against an accounting estimate, or an institution against its own standard. I study a sender-receiver game in which reports are costly to move away from such privately observed anchors. Anchor heterogeneity changes the geometry of communication. Rather than relying on partitions, privately anchored reporting generates continuous variation in messages because different senders find different reports costly to make. This mechanism can improve information transmission, but it can also pull reports toward noisy private anchors. I show that (i) small positive reporting costs can make communication approach full revelation, even though zero costs return the model to cheap talk, (ii) uninformative anchors can transmit information through strategic distortions. Anchored reports and cheap-talk messages can coexist as endogenous hard and soft information, but cheap-talk alone is preferred by all parties under sufficiently low misalignment, explaining why organizations may rely exclusively on informal channels.

2026-05-23T20:48:36Z Jeremy Bertomeu http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.12224v2 2026-05-23T20:00:19Z

Two-sided matching platforms rely on preferences from both sides, yet participants can evaluate only a small fraction of potential partners. In practice, they use low-cost pre-match screening, e.g., interviews, profile views, or trial tasks, to form noisy impressions before committing to applications and offers. We study bandit learning in matching markets with interviews, modeling these interactions as queried \emph{hints}~\citep{DBLP:conf/innovations/BhaskaraGIKM23} that reveal partial preference information to both sides while constraining subsequent applications. Our framework also allows firm-side uncertainty: firms, like agents, learn their preferences and may make early hiring mistakes. To address this, we introduce strategic deferral, a firm-side action that permits temporary vacancy, corrects premature commitments, and enables decentralized learning under coarse anonymous feedback. We design algorithms for centralized and decentralized markets and show that a constant number of interviews per round suffices for horizon-independent regret, improving over the $O(\log T)$ guarantees known without interviews. Our bounds are near-optimal: the centralized guarantee is within a factor $m$ of an information-theoretic lower bound, while decentralized algorithms match it up to polynomial factors in structured markets and remain horizon-independent in general markets.

2026-02-12T18:03:37Z Amirmahdi Mirfakhar Xuchuang Wang Mengfan Xu Hedyeh Beyhaghi Mohammad Hajiesmaili http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.08472v3 2026-05-23T15:54:58Z

This paper shows that diagnostic expectations (DE) and rational expectations (RE) are not observationally equivalent in dynamic stochastic general equilibrium (DSGE) models. Using the frequency-domain framework of Qu and Tkachenko (2012, 2017), I show that no RE parameterization yields the DE-implied autocovariance structure of the macroeconomic observables considered in either small- or medium-scale DSGE models, even after structural frictions and shock processes are reparameterized. Incorporating DE preserves overall identification but weakens the identification of shock variances. In the medium-scale model, among the frictions, wage rigidity emerges as most important for generating the benchmark DE model dynamics.

2025-09-10T10:20:06Z Jinting Guo http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.12476v7 2026-05-22T22:46:41Z

I use a novel approach to compare information in several classes of moral hazard problems: implementability, cost under risk neutrality and limited liability, and cost facing an agent with a general preference for money. Incentives in moral hazard problems are determined by the agent's state-dependent utility. Motivated by this observation, I define three nested geometric orders on information: the column space, the conic span, and the zonotope orders. Each order admits four equivalent characterizations: (i) inclusion of feasible state-dependent utility sets, (ii) dominance in the corresponding class of moral hazard problems, (iii) matrix factorizations, (iv) posterior belief distributions. In particular, the orders apply to both the classic and the flexible moral hazard problems, providing a unified framework to compare information.

2025-07-05T17:26:00Z Zizhe Xia http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.24233v1 2026-05-22T21:22:08Z

A user faces a list returned by a search system, ordered by a noisy proxy for relevance, and decides sequentially whether to pay a fixed cost to inspect another item or stop with the best she has uncovered. She does not enter the page knowing how good its items are, so each inspection both produces a candidate item and refines her belief about the page's underlying quality. We show the optimal policy is a standout rule: the user stops as soon as her best find exceeds her posterior mean of an average item on the page by a depth-dependent threshold. The induced dynamics collapse to a one-dimensional Markov chain, which yields the full distribution of inspection depth through a closed-form recursion. The model uncovers three hidden mechanisms (trust, commit, and cut-losses) on why users stop and yields a rich set of testable implications. Moreover, the Bayesian-rational view delivers a novel learning-to-rank likelihood: an observed depth censors the latent relevance path into a polyhedron of survival inequalities, whose Gaussian probability is a differentiable function of any feature-based relevance prediction.

2026-05-22T21:22:08Z Shichao Ma http://arxiv.org/abs/2201.03784v4 2026-05-22T20:31:08Z

We explore heterogeneous prices as a source of heterogeneous or stochastic demand. Heterogeneous prices could arise either because there is actual price variation among consumers or because consumers (mis)perceive prices differently. Our main result says the following: if heterogeneous prices have a distribution among consumers that is (in a sense) stable across observations, then a model where consumers have a common utility function but face heterogeneous prices has precisely the same implications as a heterogeneous preference/random utility model (with no price heterogeneity).

2022-01-11T05:07:05Z John K. -H. Quah Gerelt Tserenjigmid http://arxiv.org/abs/2304.00438v2 2026-05-22T19:26:16Z

We propose a generalization of Quantal Response Equilibrium (QRE) built on a simple premise: some actions are more focal than others. In our model, which we call the Focal Quantal Response Equilibrium (Focal QRE), each player plays a stochastic version of Nash equilibrium as in the QRE, but some strategies are focal and thus are chosen relatively more frequently than other strategies after accounting for expected utilities. The Focal QRE is able to systematically account for various forms of bounded rationality of players, especially regret-aversion, salience, or limited consideration. The Focal QRE is also useful for explaining the observed heterogeneity of bounded rationality of players across different games. We show that regret-based focal sets perform relatively well at predicting strategies that are chosen more frequently relative to their expected utilities.

2023-04-02T03:20:54Z Matthew Kovach Gerelt Tserenjigmid http://arxiv.org/abs/2506.12337v3 2026-05-22T12:18:54Z

This study investigates the effects of artificial intelligence (AI) adoption in organizations. We ask: First, how should a principal optimally deploy limited AI resources to replace workers in a team? Second, in a sequential workflow, which workers face the highest risk of AI replacement? Third, would the principal always prefer to fully utilize all available AI resources, or are there any benefits to keeping some slack AI capacity? Fourth, what are the effects of optimal AI deployment on the wage level and intra-team wage inequality? We develop a sequential team production model in which a principal can use peer monitoring--where each worker observes a signal of their predecessor's effort--to discipline team members. The principal may replace some workers with AI agents, whose actions are not subject to moral hazard. Our analysis yields four key results. First, the optimal AI strategy stochastically replaces workers rather than fixating on a single position. Second, the principal replaces workers at the beginning and at the end of the workflow, but does not replace the middle worker, since this worker is crucial for sustaining the flow of information obtained by peer monitoring. Third, the principal may optimally underutilize available AI capacity. Fourth, the optimal AI adoption increases average wages and reduces intra-team wage inequality.

2025-06-14T04:09:26Z Xienan Cheng Mustafa Dogan Pinar Yildirim http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.05076v2 2026-05-21T18:12:34Z

Ambiguity-averse decision makers typically dislike not only the presence of ambiguous events but also their increase, contrary to what standard ambiguity models predict. We axiomatically study such a decision maker. She avoids ex ante randomization over prospects since it only increases the number of relevant ambiguous events without providing a hedge against uncertainty. Our axioms lead to a representation in which the decision maker behaves as if optimizing her ambiguity perception at a cost. We show the uniqueness of the representation, and conduct comparatives of attitudes toward ambiguity and its increase. This identification is not achieved without considering ex ante randomization.

2025-09-05T13:15:53Z Yutaro Akita Kensei Nakamura http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.16401v2 2026-05-21T15:30:30Z

We study Stackelberg Equilibria (Bowley optima) in a monopolistic centralized sequential-move insurance market, with a profit-maximizing insurer who sets premia using a distortion premium principle, and a single policyholder who seeks to minimize a distortion risk measure. We show that equilibria are characterized as follows: In equilibrium, the optimal indemnity function exhibits a layer-type structure, providing full insurance over any loss layer on which the policyholder is more pessimistic than the insurer's pricing functional about tail losses; and no insurance coverage over loss layers on which the policyholder is less pessimistic than the insurer's pricing functional about tail losses. In equilibrium, the optimal pricing distortion function is determined by the policyholder's degree of risk aversion, whereby prices never exceed the policyholder's marginal willingness to insure tail losses. Moreover, we show that both the insurance coverage and the insurer's expected profit increase with the policyholder's degree of risk aversion. Additionally, and echoing recent work in the literature, we show that equilibrium contracts are Pareto efficient, but they do not induce a welfare gain to the policyholder. Conversely, any Pareto-optimal contract that leaves no welfare gain to the policyholder can be obtained as an equilibrium contract. Finally, we consider a few examples of interest that recover some existing results in the literature as special cases of our analysis.

2026-02-18T12:21:18Z Maria Andraos Mario Ghossoub Bin Li Benxuan Shi 10.1017/asb.2026.10106