https://arxiv.org/api/22/h8i0dCn+11iYzfItjQHLp54w 2026-06-21T11:37:05Z 4059 150 15 http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.28562v1 2026-05-27T14:51:46Z

In this short note, I show that in a McCall (1970) model with risk-neutral agents, a system of wage insurance combined with unemployment insurance financed by a lump-sum tax on the employed can be replicated -- in the ex ante sense -- by a system of unemployment insurance that depends on the agent's wage when last employed and a tax that depends on the agent's wage when employed. This holds with or without endogenous search when unemployed. I also show that wage insurance is not binding until the last earned wage exceeds a threshold, which may be of independent interest.

2026-05-27T14:51:46Z Anchi Xia http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.02074v2 2026-05-27T13:58:30Z

We characterize the outcomes of a canonical deterministic model for the intergenerational transmission of capital that features differential fertility. A fertility function determines the relationship between parental capital and the number of children, and a transmission function determines the relationship between the capital of a parent and that of their children. Together these functions generate an evolving cross-sectional distribution of capital. We establish easy-to-verify conditions on the fertility and transmission functions that guarantee (a) that the dynamical system has a steady state distribution that is either atomless (exhibiting inequality) or degenerate (not exhibiting inequality), and (b) that the system converges to such states from essentially any initial distribution. Our characterization provides new insights into the link between differential fertility and long-run cross-sectional inequality, and it gives rise to novel comparative statics relating the two. We apply our results to several parametric examples and to a model of economic growth that features endogenous differential fertility.

2025-03-03T21:54:14Z Francis Dennig Bassel Tarbush http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.28265v1 2026-05-27T10:13:24Z

We study the robustness of Bayesian persuasion to uncertainty about the receiver's preferences. We analyze two conceptually distinct notions: continuity, in which only the modeler lacks precise knowledge, but where the model's predictions are nonetheless accurate; and robustness, in which the sender also lacks precise knowledge, but where the outcome is insensitive to this ignorance. We model preference uncertainty as infinitesimally small, non-probabilistic (Knightian) uncertainty, and the sender's behavior as either minimizing the regret or maximizing the minimum utility. We show that continuity holds if and only if robustness holds, and that both notions are generic. Thus, while some instances of Bayesian persuasion are fragile, typical instances are both continuous and robust with respect to a small amount of ignorance.

2026-05-27T10:13:24Z Ronen Gradwohl Fengming Hu Rann Smorodinsky http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.28263v1 2026-05-27T10:12:32Z

I provide a unified framework to establish the existence of a weak Pareto efficient, envy-free allocation in general settings: random allocations are probability measures on a compact metric space, and preferences of agents are represented by continuous, concave utility function on the space of probability measures. The generality of my setting nests the existence results for small spaces with indivisibles -- the list of prominent applications includes the school assignment problem and the house allocation problem. The technique developed to prove the existence also applies to allocation problems with divisibles, like fair cake-cutting or land-division problems. Here I also show that even when agents' preferences are not atomless, the allocation in question can be represented as a probability measure over partitions with finite support. Last but not least, I apply the existence result to new allocation problems that no existing framework encompasses. These include allocation of indivisible goods or services over time and allocation of differentiated goods.

2026-05-27T10:12:32Z 29 pages, Appendix included. Previously circulated as "The Existence of Pareto Efficient and Envy Free random allocations in generalized settings" Anna Vakarova http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.13416v2 2026-05-26T21:55:07Z

We propose and axiomatize preferences on a product state space in light of uncertainty regarding the dependency of different payoff-relevant factors. Dependence structures allow to decompose probabilities and allow to pin down behavior towards dependence. The degree of dependence aversion is measured by dependence premia that are compatible with the encompassed MEU and smooth preferences on the dependence uncertainty set. A separation axiom clarifies when uncertainty about dependence breaks down and the decision maker treats factors as independent, making dependence neglect testable. We describe the dependence uncertainty set as a convex polytope and characterize their extreme points as maximizers of divergences. The model and its tools are applied to simple examples on climate change, insurance, and portfolio choice.

2025-03-17T17:47:24Z Gerrit Bauch Lorenz Hartmann http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.27698v1 2026-05-26T21:19:35Z

This paper introduces the Dual-System Thinking (DST) model, a decision-theoretic framework that integrates psychological dual-process theories into economic modeling. A single cognitive weight parameter governs the relative influence of the automatic and deliberate cognitive systems. Even the simplest form of DST exhibits distinct behavioral patterns, suggesting that the psychological insights of dual-system theory offer a distinct and valuable approach to modeling choice behavior. Empirically, we show that the model can accommodate several empirical findings and outperform well-known models in discrete choice analysis across various contexts. We also apply the model to study optimal list design and rationality in stochastic environments.

2026-05-26T21:19:35Z Yusufcan Masatlioglu Tri Phu Vu http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.08412v3 2026-05-26T18:43:45Z

We study repeated resource allocation with strategic agents, where monetary transfers are disallowed and the planner has no prior information on agents' utility distributions. Inspired by the costly state verification literature, we assume the planner can request costly audits on the winning agent after allocation, revealing their true utility but without the ability to revoke the allocation. We design a mechanism achieving $T$-independent $\mathcal O(K^2)$ regret in social welfare while requesting $\mathcal O(K^3 \log T)$ audits in expectation, where $K$ is the number of agents and $T$ is the number of rounds. We further show an $Ω(K)$ lower bound on the regret and an $Ω(1)$ lower bound on the number of audits required for low regret. We also generalize our mechanism and analysis to imperfect audit models. Algorithmically, we show that incentivizing truthful behavior relies on accurately estimating agents' truthful winning probability online. To achieve this, we impose future punishments via adaptive audits; we also introduce an incentive-aligned flagging component allowing agents to flag biased estimates, which we prove is in their best interest. Analytically, without distributional information, the revelation principle cannot dictate a truth-telling equilibrium. Instead, we characterize a Perfect Bayesian Equilibrium via a reduction to an auxiliary game with only benign strategies. The technical tools developed herein can be of independent interest for other robust mechanism design problems where the revelation principle is inapplicable.

2025-02-12T13:53:21Z A preliminary version was accepted to the 38th Annual Conference on Learning Theory (COLT 2025). This version includes two key extensions to imperfect audit models, thoroughly revised main body and technical sections, and a refined literature review to include costly state verification (CSV) Yan Dai Moise Blanchard Patrick Jaillet http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.26948v1 2026-05-26T12:38:53Z

We study the problem of allocating a finite estate among agents whose total claims exceed the available resources, a standard framework in the theory of claims problems. Two canonical rules embody competing fairness ideals: the Proportional rule allocates in proportion to claims, while the Constrained Equal Awards (CEA) rule equalizes awards as much as possible subject to claim-boundedness. We introduce the P-CEA family of compromise rules, which assigns each agent a fixed baseline award, capped by her claim, and distributes the remaining estate proportionally to residual claims. By varying the baseline parameter, this family generates a continuum of allocation rules that interpolates between the Proportional and CEA benchmarks. We provide an axiomatic characterization based on two threshold-dependent principles: No Advantageous Reallocation, which prevents agents with claims above the threshold from benefiting through coordinated claim redistribution that preserves the threshold condition, and Sustainable Lower Bound, which guarantees each agent at least the minimum of her claim and the threshold. We further develop a dual analysis that reallocates losses instead of awards and characterize the corresponding dual family using the dual versions of our axioms.

2026-05-26T12:38:53Z JEL Classifications: C71; D63; D61; H23. Keywords: Claims problem; Fair division; Resource allocation; Compromise rules; Proportionality; Constrained equal awards; Axiomatic foundations; Inequality measures Anisha Bandyopadhyay Sinan Ertemel Rajnish Kumar Saptarshi Mukherjee http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.26639v1 2026-05-26T07:21:40Z

We study a tractable two-player contest built on a truncated cubic contest success function. Its defining feature is a strategic-feedback parameter whose sign determines whether a leading player's effort lowers (suppression) or raises (empowerment) the marginal effectiveness of the trailing player's effort; standard lottery contests impose suppression by construction. The benchmark yields closed-form mixed equilibria under complete information and a unique affine Bayesian Nash equilibrium under IID private information. Expected effort is typically single-peaked in the feedback parameter. Uncertainty lowers effort under suppression but raises it under empowerment, and the same asymmetry governs information disclosure: an effort-maximizing designer withholds information under suppression and discloses fully under empowerment. Several familiar conclusions of contest theory turn out to reflect suppressive benchmarks rather than contests as such.

2026-05-26T07:21:40Z Alexander Matros University of South Carolina Constantine Sorokin University of Glasgow http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.26604v1 2026-05-26T06:39:56Z

Mechanism-mediated service markets with polymatroidal feasibility admit efficient, dominant-strategy incentive-compatible (DSIC) allocation, but these guarantees implicitly assume truthful execution by the marketplace operator. Modelling the operator as a strategic player, we establish a credibility trilemma: for single-parameter agents on a non-modular polymatroid, no static sealed-bid mechanism is simultaneously revenue-optimal, DSIC for agents, and credible for the operator. We introduce the Cost of Non-Credibility (CoNC) as a price-of-anarchy-style welfare-loss measure and obtain tight $Θ$-bounds across five topology classes (single-edge, series, parallel, tree, series-parallel), plus a matching upper bound $O(|\mathcal{S}|)$ on general DAGs realised by an $Ω(|\mathcal{S}|)$ witness on the SP-augmented sub-family, turning the trilemma into a structural quantity. Three structurally distinct resolutions follow: public broadcast or deferred-revelation commitment, administrative domain separation under settlement separation and four side conditions, and integrator competition orthogonal to mechanism execution under disjoint actors. An instance-level grounding over the edge-pricing market of Amin et al. confirms the trilemma's robustness on a refereed external setting. The result establishes marketplace neutrality as a first-order design constraint on polymatroidal service markets rather than an implementation detail: where the operator is a strategic player, credibility trades off against revenue optimality and agent incentive compatibility along structurally characterised lines.

2026-05-26T06:39:56Z 75 pages, 3 figures. Prepared for submission to the ACM Transactions on Economics and Computation (TEAC) Lauri Lovén Sujit Gujar Kalle Timperi Hassan Mehmood Praveen Kumar Donta Sasu Tarkoma Schahram Dustdar http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.26516v1 2026-05-26T03:57:59Z

This paper introduces state-robust equilibrium (SRE), a local validity test for Nash predictions in finite-strategy population games when the payoff-relevant aggregate state may be misspecified. The reported prescription and payoff map are held fixed; only the state used to evaluate payoff comparisons varies. SRE is equivalent to local best-response invariance, absence of structural exposure, and validity along every vanishing interior aggregate-state error. In affine games, the tangent-cone, normal-cone, and linear-program tests characterize exposure and identify the exposing population, the pure strategy, and the aggregate-state direction. The main implication is a sharp negative result: robust mixing requires local payoff identity on the support; in generic affine games, SRE reduce to strict pure Nash equilibria, although weak boundary equilibria can survive through feasible-set protection. In affine games with polyhedral local uncertainty regions, the same inequalities yield a deterministic finite diagnostic for reported-state validity.

2026-05-26T03:57:59Z Rui Sun Junfei Guo http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.26367v1 2026-05-25T22:29:12Z

We study stochastic object assignment problems in which objects may have minimum and maximum requirements, such as with classes with upper and lower enrollment bounds. We construct a new random assignment mechanism, the minimums probabilistic serial (MPS) mechanism, which generalizes the Probabilistic Serial mechanism of Bogomolnaia and Moulin (2001). The random allocation produced by MPS is guaranteed to be Pareto efficient; that is, there is no other implementable allocation that all agents prefer via first order stochastic dominance. We also show that MPS is i) envy-free, in that no agent will strictly prefer another agent's assignment, and ii) weak strategyproof, in that agents cannot achieve a better assignment by misreporting their preferences.

2026-05-25T22:29:12Z Will Sandholtz Andrew Tai http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.19884v2 2026-05-25T16:16:16Z

Contract theory typically assumes full commitment by the principal, but many contracts fix some payoff-relevant decisions while leaving others discretionary. We ask when imperfect commitment is equivalent to full commitment. For contracts in which a committed baseline is followed by a bounded discretionary adjustment, as in commercial-insurance schedule rating or civil penalties, bounded discretion is allocation-neutral. When contractible and non-contractible decisions are distinct instruments, the equivalence fails. We characterize optimal single-principal contracts and show that simple-offer equilibria are robust under competing principals. The methodological contribution is an extended taxation principle that makes these analyses more tractable.

2026-05-19T14:15:09Z Seungjin Han Siyang Xiong http://arxiv.org/abs/2411.11183v8 2026-05-25T14:45:19Z

How does competition in markets for information affect the creation and division of surplus? We study this question in a search environment in which an agent searches sequentially for a high-quality good and learns about the quality of sampled goods by repeatedly purchasing signals from profit-maximizing information brokers. Brokers design and price signals but can commit only to spot contracts. We characterize the equilibrium payoff set as a function of the market structure -- the number of competing brokers. When search costs are low, market structure affects neither surplus generation nor its division. When costs are high, however, competition benefits the agent but reduces total surplus relative to monopoly. Methodologically, we extend repeated-games theory to stopping problems such as sequential search.

2024-11-17T21:57:45Z Teddy Mekonnen Bobak Pakzad-Hurson http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.10109v3 2026-05-24T23:06:37Z

In this paper, we study the public procurement market through the lens of game theory by modeling it as a strategic game with discontinuous and non-quasiconcave payoffs. We first show that the game admits no Nash equilibrium in pure strategies. We then analyze the two-player case and derive two explicit mixed-strategy equilibria for the symmetric game and for the weighted $(p,1-p)$ formulation. Finally, we establish the existence of a symmetric Nash equilibrium in the general $N$-player case by applying an extended version of Dasgupta and Maskin result, which allows us to extend equilibrium existence to the mixed-strategy setting despite payoff discontinuities.

2025-12-10T21:57:09Z Nizar Riane