https://arxiv.org/api/WP+SDlRtS1d9NG0QRJVh9m7HgVA 2026-09-11T18:48:39Z 4354 15 15 http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.09888v1 2026-09-09T08:44:56Z

I derive an explicit mapping from initial assets, income and the real interest rate to consumption for an income fluctuation problem with a borrowing constraint and CARA utility. I show that there exists a threshold of initial wealth over which the partial equilibrium consumption response to a permanent increase in the real interest rate is positive, consistent with recent empirical evidence. I further show that precautionary savings reinforce the possibility of crowding in and that the possibility of a positive response extends to a more standard CRRA utility whenever the elasticity of intertemporal substitution is strictly less than 1.

2026-09-09T08:44:56Z Jordan Roulleau-Pasdeloup http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.19329v2 2026-09-09T07:22:54Z

Standard DSGE solution practice closes forward-looking equilibrium problems by combining model specification with criteria that select one operational equilibrium from multiple candidate paths, yet this closure step typically remains implicit. This paper formalizes that closure step as a substantive operation in standard DSGE solution practice. By separating the economic specification ($S$), the self-referential operator ($T$), and the equilibrium selection rule ($Π$), the $(S, T, Π)$ triad provides a descriptive semantic grammar for comparing closure choices across familiar solution environments. The framework clarifies what standard solver diagnostics actually report, captures the regime-iteration logic of piecewise-linear methods like OccBin, explains why independent linear solvers often reproduce the same selected equilibrium, and distinguishes within-model refinements from specification-augmenting closure changes under indeterminacy.

2026-01-27T08:14:18Z 27 pages, 0 figures, 3 tables. Replacement version: substantial revision from the previous version, with rewritten introduction, clarified axiomatic framework, and revised discussions of indeterminacy, alternative closure, and OccBin Mitsuhiro Okano http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.20664v3 2026-09-09T07:18:38Z

Correlation is not causation... until the right variables are on the table. We propose a model of causal persuasion, in which a sender selectively discloses variables alongside a subjective causal model linking them. Persuasion requires that the model rules out rival explanations, on top of being consistent with the underlying data distribution. To establish a causal link, the sender often needs to disclose at most two well-chosen variables, whereas dispelling a perceived link, every common cause must be disclosed. This highlights a fundamental asymmetry: Establishing causality is often much easier than ruling it out.

2026-04-22T15:12:21Z Anastasia Burkovskaya Egor Starkov http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.12024v3 2026-09-09T06:15:24Z

Mean field equilibrium (MFE) has emerged as a computationally tractable solution concept for large dynamic games. However, computing MFE remains challenging due to nonlinearities and the absence of contraction properties, limiting its reliability for counterfactual analysis and comparative statics. This paper studies dynamic models in which agents interact through a small number of functions of the population distribution, with particular emphasis on the scalar case. Such low-dimensional interactions naturally arise in a wide range of applications in economics and operations. The main contribution of this paper is to introduce iterative algorithms that leverage this structure and have provide global convergence guarantees for computing and learning MFE under mild assumptions. Unlike existing approaches, our algorithms do not require monotonicity or contraction properties. We also provide model-free algorithms that learn an approximate MFE from simulation using reinforcement learning methods, without requiring prior knowledge of payoff or transition functions. Beyond computation, we establish existence of stationary MFE for non-compact state spaces. For scalar interactions, we also derive analytical comparative statics without requiring monotonicity of the equilibrium mapping. We apply our methods to classical models of dynamic competition, including capacity competition; to heterogeneous-agent macroeconomic models; and to models motivated by online marketplaces and learning, including inventory competition, ridesharing, and social learning. The applications illustrate how changes in market parameters affect equilibrium outcomes and how the algorithms can be used for reliable counterfactual analysis.

2025-02-02T09:38:40Z Bar Light http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.09693v1 2026-09-09T04:18:40Z

In large markets, scarce attention limits partner evaluation and creates allocation loss, which stability magnifies. In an independent random market with average executable degree $d$, unmatched shares fall at rates $e^{-\sqrt d}$ under stability and $e^{-d}$ under maximum matching on the same graph. Changing consideration can make applications rejected in a provisional active-screen computation relevant again. Exact query-neutral implementation must retain allocation-relevant off-screen authorizations; otherwise, missing authorization must be reacquired. Limited-attention deferred acceptance (LA-DA) preserves valid authorizations and reengages eligible pairs. Conditional on exact next-best information and persistent execution rights, adaptive discovery saves a logarithmic factor in reached proposals relative to independent exposure. In an application to speed dating, bilateral reports let us compare stable and maximum matching on restricted graphs, separating missed opportunities from same-graph stability loss. In Chilean school choice, we document 9,502 applicants accepting higher-ranked or new placements through retained rankings.

2026-09-09T04:18:40Z 21 pages of main text; 48 pages including appendices and references Victor H. Aguiar Dian Hong http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.29488v2 2026-09-08T19:43:38Z

Concave consumption functions imply a marginal propensity to consume that falls with wealth. I characterize the utility functions that guarantee this property in finite-horizon optimal saving problems with stochastic discounting, returns, income, and borrowing limits. Under conditional impatience---the conditional expected discounted gross return does not exceed one---consumption functions are always concave if and only if inverse absolute prudence, $-u''/u'''$, is concave. When no conditional-impatience restriction is imposed, hyperbolic absolute risk aversion (HARA) is necessary and sufficient for uniform concavity. Thus conditional impatience permits declining marginal propensities to consume for a preference class strictly larger than HARA.

2026-08-30T00:37:05Z Alexis Akira Toda http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.14712v6 2026-09-08T18:56:24Z

I study electoral competition between two ideologically polarized parties that are both office- and policy-motivated. Parties have fixed and opposing ideological positions but compete by choosing platforms on a second, continuous policy dimension. The analysis uncovers a non-monotonic relationship between ideological and policy polarization. When ideological polarization is low, an increase leads to policy moderation; when it is high, the opposite occurs, and policies become more extreme. Moreover, an electoral advantage shifts both parties' platforms toward the advantaged party's preferred policy, implying that the advantaged party adopts the more extreme position. More generally, both high- and low-valence candidates may adopt more extreme policies, depending on the electorate's degree of ideological polarization.

2025-02-20T16:39:29Z Philipp Denter http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.05802v7 2026-09-08T15:12:47Z

Controversial views often go unspoken because of fears of retaliation. Speaking up one at a time may encourage others to join in, but retaliation against early participants can stop that cascade before a group large enough to protect itself forms. However, a sufficiently large group could speak up safely if only they spoke up together. A Social Assurance Contract collects endorsements of a controversial view in private and publishes them only when the group is large enough to protect itself. Such contracts can tunnel under the barrier that stops public cascades, forming coalitions that one-by-one public organizing cannot reach.

2026-07-07T03:55:31Z Matthew Cashman http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.28265v2 2026-09-08T11:47:55Z

We study the robustness of Bayesian persuasion to (Knightian) uncertainty about the receiver's preferences. We consider two properties: continuity, in which only the modeler lacks precise knowledge while the model's predictions are nonetheless accurate; and robustness, in which the sender also lacks precise knowledge, but where the outcome is insensitive to this ignorance. For the latter, we model the sender's behavior as either maximizing worst-case utility or minimizing the regret. We show that the notions are equivalent. In addition, they are equivalent to robustness to tie-breaking. Finally, we show that robustness holds generically.

2026-05-27T10:13:24Z Ronen Gradwohl Fengming Hu Rann Smorodinsky http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.16850v2 2026-09-08T10:24:22Z

We study continuous-time persuasion where a sender controls both how informative a signal is over time and when to stop providing information to a receiver. There is an exogenous signal process, which the sender both garbles and stops, delaying the receiver's decision at a convex, increasing cost of time. We show that, although both instruments are available, under natural regularity conditions, full transparency is always optimal: the sender keeps the signal fully informative and persuades solely by choosing when to stop.

2025-12-18T18:22:49Z Can Urgun Mark Whitmeyer http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.08357v1 2026-09-08T07:27:43Z

An open problem in approval-based multiwinner voting concerns whether we can efficiently compute committees that satisfy both justified representation and Pareto optimality. We answer this question negatively by proving that, on the domain of all profiles, outputting a committee satisfying both axioms is NP-hard. An initial proof was found by ChatGPT Astra. This was then verified and rewritten by the author.

2026-09-08T07:27:43Z 6 pages Chris Dong http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.10525v6 2026-09-08T06:14:07Z

I study the optimal design of ratings to motivate an agent's investment in quality when transfers are unavailable. The principal designs a (possibly stochastic) rating scheme that maps quality to a distribution over signals. The agent privately knows his ability and chooses a quality level. A competitive market then offers the agent a wage equal to his expected quality given the signal. I reduce the rating design problem to a mechanism design problem with a majorization constraint. When the principal maximizes expected quality, randomization has no value if the ability density is log-concave or increasing: lower censorship is then optimal among all rating schemes, and pass/fail tests are also optimal if the density is increasing. By contrast, every optimal rating scheme involves randomization if the density is decreasing and sufficiently log-convex---roughly, if intermediate ability is scarce relative to high and low ability.

2024-07-15T08:33:21Z Peiran Xiao http://arxiv.org/abs/2302.09336v2 2026-09-08T03:56:50Z

The collapse process is a constitutive sub-process in the full finding Nash equilibrium process. We conducted laboratory game experiments with human subjects to study this process. We observed significant pulse signals in the collapse process. The observations from the data support the completeness and consistency of the game dynamics paradigm.

2023-02-18T14:04:53Z Wang Yijia Wang Zhijian http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.07898v1 2026-09-07T19:01:24Z

We study voluntary disclosure when investors observe firm reports through noisy information intermediaries such as auditors, analysts, rating agencies, or data providers. Any processing noise overturns the standard prediction of a unique partial-disclosure equilibrium. With low disclosure costs, the model unravels to full disclosure despite positive costs. With higher costs, the game admits two threshold equilibria featuring different disclosure probabilities. We characterize how the cost threshold for unraveling and the equilibrium set respond to changes in noise and fundamental uncertainty. In settings with high disclosure, both uncertainty and processing noise reduce disclosure, while higher certification costs can counterintuitively increase it. Endogenizing disclosure costs as optimal fees shows how profit-maximizing intermediaries select among equilibria, potentially generating a high-fee, high-disclosure regime. Extensions with bounded support, uncertain information endowment, endogenous noise, and competing information sources apply the insights to general information environments. The results caution against interpreting greater frictions as necessarily reducing disclosure.

2026-09-07T19:01:24Z 76 pages, 7 figures. JEL codes: D4, D7, D8 Jeremy Bertomeu Edwige Cheynel Peicong Hu http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.07871v1 2026-09-07T18:31:19Z

We study why organizations conduct interim performance reviews when monetary rewards are limited. An interim review creates incentive capacity by allowing future work and career opportunities to serve as rewards for past performance. Optimal review policies map a continuum of performance outcomes into a simple incentive ladder: termination, tough or easy continuation, and, for exceptional performance, an early maximal reward with no further work. Review can even sustain high effort when terminal compensation alone cannot. Its timing balances two forces: waiting improves the information revealed by performance, but leaves less future work available to motivate the agent.

2026-09-07T18:31:19Z Doruk Cetemen Yonggyun Kim Fei Li Curtis R. Taylor