https://arxiv.org/api/WP+SDlRtS1d9NG0QRJVh9m7HgVA 2026-03-20T10:46:06Z 3810 15 15 http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.17578v1 2026-03-18T10:34:24Z

Ranking individuals based on their performance in different coalitions is a problem emerging in various domains (teams sports, scientific evaluation, argumentation, etc.). Often, for practical reasons, the number of comparable coalitions is limited. Therefore, the foundational principles of ranking solutions must support realistic interpretations in contexts where only certain coalitions can be compared. To address this issue, in this paper we present an axiomatic analysis of solutions for the social ranking problem centered on the notion of consistency. More precisely, we show that an appropriate notion of consistency, which specifies how to combine rankings on individuals across different rankings on coalitions, plays a key role in any axiomatic characterization, representing the true distinguishing feature of each solution. This role is further highlighted by the taxonomy of the complementary axioms used in our characterizations, which boil down to well-studied properties of invariance with respect to the label of players or coalitions, and also with respect to minor changes in a coalitional ranking. By showing the logical independence of the axioms used in each characterization, as well as a rigorous analysis of alternative notions of consistency with respect to the majority of solutions from the literature, this work attempts to provide a first systematic study of the social ranking problem over a variable domain of coalitions.

2026-03-18T10:34:24Z Takahiro Suzuki Michele Aleandri Stefano Moretti http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.04298v2 2026-03-17T22:35:19Z

We present a new method for computation of the index of completely mixed equilibria in finite games, based on the work of Eisenbud et al.(1977). We apply this method to solving two questions about the relation of the index of equilibria and the index of fixed points, and the index of equilibria and payoff-robustness: any integer can be the index of an isolated completely mixed equilibrium of a finite game. In a particular class of isolated completely mixed equilibria, called monogenic, the index can be $0$, $+1$ or $-1$ only. In this class non-zero index is equivalent to payoff-robustness. We also discuss extensions of the method of computation to extensive-form games, and cases where the equilibria might be located on the boundary of the strategy set.

2026-03-04T17:17:35Z Lucas Pahl http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.20606v2 2026-03-17T14:17:24Z

Meritocratic systems, from admissions to hiring, aim to impartially reward skill and effort. Yet persistent disparities across race, gender, and class challenge this ideal. Some attribute these gaps to structural inequality; others to individual choice. We develop a game-theoretic model in which candidates from different socioeconomic groups differ in their perceived post-selection value--shaped by social context and, increasingly, by AI-powered tools offering personalized career or salary guidance. Each candidate strategically chooses effort, balancing its cost against expected reward; effort translates into observable merit, and selection is based solely on merit. We characterize the unique Nash equilibrium in the large-agent limit and derive explicit formulas showing how valuation disparities and institutional selectivity jointly determine effort, representation, social welfare, and utility. We further propose a cost-sensitive optimization framework that quantifies how modifying selectivity or perceived value can reduce disparities without compromising institutional goals. Our analysis reveals a perception-driven bias: when perceptions of post-selection value differ across groups, these differences translate into rational differences in effort, propagating disparities backward through otherwise "fair" selection processes. While the model is static, it captures one stage of a broader feedback cycle linking perceptions, incentives, and outcome--bridging rational-choice and structural explanations of inequality by showing how techno-social environments shape individual incentives in meritocratic systems.

2025-10-23T14:38:05Z The paper has been accepted by NeurIPS 2025 L. Elisa Celis Lingxiao Huang Milind Sohoni Nisheeth K. Vishnoi http://arxiv.org/abs/2204.00347v16 2026-03-17T07:58:01Z

We study dynamic mechanism design in a pure-exchange economy with privately observed idiosyncratic income. In the standard infinitely lived hidden-income benchmark of Green (1987) and Thomas-Worrall (1990), constrained-efficient allocations exhibit immiseration. We propose a simple recursive mechanism -- adapted from Marcet-Marimon (1992) -- that shifts each income shock forward by one period, keeps promised utilities in a bounded set, and, under a transparent ``moderate risk-aversion'' condition, delivers sequential efficiency. In a stationary \emph{overlapping-generations} setting, we further show that under additional symmetry and curvature assumptions, a second-order approximation yields a sufficient condition for period-by-period budget balance; early cohorts pre-fund later transfers; for suitable initial promises, all cohorts are better off than under autarky. Our analysis uses a single state (promised utility), closed-form transfers, and a Bellman verification.

2022-04-01T10:49:28Z 19 pages. The earlier version of this paper was circulated under the title "Mutual insurance for uninsurable income" Michiko Ogaku http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.16202v1 2026-03-17T07:28:43Z

Electric vehicles (EVs) require substantially longer refueling times than gasoline vehicles, which can generate severe congestion at charging stations when demand concentrates. We propose a two-stage allocation framework for EV charging networks. In Stage 1, a central coordinator determines station-level admission quotas to control worst-station delay using a queue-informed congestion metric. In Stage 2, given these quotas and feasibility constraints (e.g., reachability), the coordinator solves a utility-maximizing capacitated assignment to allocate EVs across stations. To keep Stage~2 tractable while capturing heterogeneous charging needs, we precompute each EV-station pair's optimal charging amount in closed form under a battery-capacity constraint and then solve a transportation/assignment problem. Finally, we introduce a reduced-form participation model to characterize adoption thresholds under network benefits, spillovers, and coordination costs. Numerical experiments illustrate substantial reductions in worst-case congestion with limited impact on average utility, and highlight scaling patterns as the number of stations increases.

2026-03-17T07:28:43Z Ruiwu Liu Yangjian Zhu http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.00807v2 2026-03-17T07:26:39Z

A tight alignment between the degree vector and the leading eigenvector arises naturally in networks with neutral degree mixing and the absence of local structures. Many real-world networks, however, violate both conditions. We derive bounds on the divergence between the degree vector and the eigenvector in networks with degree assortativity and local mesoscopic structures such as communities, core-peripheries, and cycles. Our approach is constructive. We design sufficiently general degree-preserving rewiring algorithms that start from a neutral benchmark and monotonically increase assortativity and the strength of local structures, with each step inducing a perturbation of the adjacency matrix. Using the Stewart--Sun Perturbation Bound, together with explicit spectral-norm control of the rewiring steps, we derive upper bounds on the angle between the eigenvector and the degree vector for modest levels of assortativity and local structures. Our analytical bounds delineate regions of `spectral safety' in which a node's degree can be used as a reliable measure of its systemic importance in real-world networks. We also substantiate our analytical bounds with numerical simulations that compute the exact angles of deviation.

2025-12-18T12:03:23Z Sreerag Puravankara Vipin P. Veetil http://arxiv.org/abs/2008.04229v11 2026-03-16T17:24:10Z

Decision makers often opt for the deferral outside option when they find it difficult to make an active choice. Contrary to existing logit models with an outside option where the latter is assigned a fixed value exogenously, this paper introduces and studies a class of logit models where that option's value is menu-dependent, may be determined endogenously, and could be interpreted as proxying the varying degree of decision difficulty at different menus. We focus on the *power logit* special class of these models. We show that these explain some observed choice-deferral effects that are caused by hard decisions, including non-monotonic "roller-coaster" choice-overload phenomena that are regulated by the presence or absence of a clearly dominant feasible alternative. We illustrate the usability, novel insights and explanatory gains of the proposed framework for duopolistic modelling and empirical discrete choice analysis.

2020-08-10T16:03:21Z Georgios Gerasimou http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.15548v1 2026-03-16T17:10:09Z

This paper points out that rational inattention is a nested regularized optimal transport problem. We use entropic optimal transport to establish the main results in Matejka and McKay (2015) and Caplin, Dean, and Leahy (2019) and extend them to arbitrary choice sets.

2026-03-16T17:10:09Z Chris Engh http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.08098v2 2026-03-16T15:37:40Z

We propose a model of whataboutism -- a rhetorical strategy that deflects criticism by citing similar misconduct that goes uncriticized on the critic's side -- and study its implications for social norms governing offensive speech. In an infinite-horizon psychological game with two rival camps, agents weigh the intrinsic benefit of offensive speech against the risk of condemnation. External criticism can be deflected via an equilibrium-based whataboutism rebuttal. We characterize the unique dynamically stable Psychological Subgame Perfect Equilibrium and show that the availability of whataboutism exacerbates offensive speech, to the extent that civility norms can break down entirely, especially in polarized societies.

2026-03-09T08:41:03Z Kfir Eliaz Ran Spiegler http://arxiv.org/abs/2304.04599v6 2026-03-16T11:33:49Z

This paper investigates a novel behavioral feature of recursive preferences: aversion to risks that persist over time, or simply \textit{correlation aversion}. Greater persistence provides information about future consumption but reduces opportunities to hedge consumption risk. I show that, for recursive preferences that exhibit a preference for early resolution of uncertainty, correlation aversion is equivalent to increasing relative risk aversion. To quantify correlation aversion, I develop the concept of the persistence premium, which measures how much an individual is willing to pay to eliminate persistence in consumption. I provide an approximation of the persistence premium in the spirit of Arrow--Pratt, which provides a quantitative representation of the trade-off between information and hedging. I show that correlation-averse preferences have a variational representation, linking correlation aversion to concerns about model misspecification. I present several applications. I first illustrate how correlation aversion shapes portfolio choices, and then show how the persistence premium can improve the calibration of macro-finance models. In an optimal taxation model, I show that recursive preferences -- unlike standard preferences -- lead to redistributive tax policies that increase social mobility.

2023-04-10T14:13:44Z Lorenzo Maria Stanca http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.15015v1 2026-03-16T09:18:25Z

This paper examines bilateral claims problems with lower and upper exclusion thresholds that determine whether an individual is excluded from initial gains or losses. We introduce the exclusion dilation operator, a method that transforms standard rules into extended rules incorporating exclusion thresholds. The operator first allocates gains and losses with respect to these thresholds and then distributes the remaining resources through a dilation transformation of an underlying standard rule. We axiomatically characterize this operator and examine which standard properties of the theory of fair allocation it preserves. While the operator maintains key properties such as homogeneity and monotonicity, it intentionally violates others, most notably order preservation, to reflect the asymmetries induced by exclusion thresholds. Our approach provides a formal methodology for resource allocation in contexts where symmetry is not appropriate due to legal and policy considerations.

2026-03-16T09:18:25Z Aitor Calo-Blanco http://arxiv.org/abs/2411.13823v2 2026-03-16T05:51:03Z

We provide and axiomatize a representation for preferences over lotteries that generalizes the expected utility model. Since the representation uses different utility functions to evaluate different lotteries, the preferences can be interpreted as coming from individuals that have context-dependent attitudes toward risks. The model enables generating various violations of the independence axiom that are not compatible with some of the most prominent models of non-expected utility. Depending on the specification chosen, the model can range from being very flexible with many different utility functions to being parsimonious with few or just one utility function.

2024-11-21T04:04:12Z Edward Honda Keh-Kuan Sun http://arxiv.org/abs/2504.09716v7 2026-03-15T20:02:04Z

Dominance is a fundamental concept in game theory. In normal-form games dominated strategies can be identified in polynomial time. As a consequence, iterative removal of dominated strategies can be performed efficiently as a preprocessing step for reducing the size of a game before computing a Nash equilibrium. For imperfect-information games in extensive form, we could convert the game to normal form and then iteratively remove dominated strategies in the same way; however, this conversion may cause an exponential blowup in game size. In this paper we define and study the concept of dominated actions in imperfect-information games. Our main result is a polynomial-time algorithm for determining whether an action is dominated (strictly or weakly) by any mixed strategy in two-player perfect-recall games with publicly observable actions, which can be extended to iteratively remove dominated actions. This allows us to efficiently reduce the size of the game tree as a preprocessing step for Nash equilibrium computation. We explore the role of dominated actions empirically in ``All In or Fold'' No-Limit Texas Hold'em poker.

2025-04-13T20:48:44Z Sam Ganzfried http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.14226v1 2026-03-15T05:15:17Z

We study a spatiotemporal service matching problem in which demand, heterogeneous in location and time sensitivity/preference, is to be assigned to service stations. The planner seeks to maximize social welfare, defined as total service reward minus spatial and temporal costs, by optimally scheduling demand to stations and service time under processing capacity constraints. We formulate the problem as an optimal transport (OT) model that allows for both demand-capacity imbalance and endogenously unserved demand when service costs exceed rewards. Leveraging a barycenter-style decomposition, we reformulate the problem as a finite-dimensional convex optimization problem that generalizes semi-discrete OT and enables scalable computation. We characterize the geometry of optimal assignments, showing that spatial partitions correspond to generalized Laguerre cells. Temporally, we show that the structure of the optimal schedule depends on demand heterogeneity: when demand differs only in temporal cost sensitivity, higher-sensitivity demand is assigned service times closer to the common ideal time; when demand differs only in preferred times, the assignment is order-preserving with respect to preferred times. We further propose an envy-free, individually rational implementation of the optimal schedule using time-dependent pricing and a finite-slot mechanism with explicit bounds depending on the number of required slots. To illustrate the framework, we extend the classic Hotelling linear-city model on a line segment by incorporating a continuum of waiting-cost sensitivities, demonstrating how optimal spatial partitions vary with changes in sensitivity heterogeneity and reward.

2026-03-15T05:15:17Z Mingyang Fu Ming Hu http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.02456v2 2026-03-14T17:30:24Z

Hedonic models value goods through their characteristics but are typically interpreted under time-separable preferences. This assumption is restrictive: when some attributes are habit forming, observed prices reflect both contemporaneous utility and continuation values from past consumption. I develop a nonparametric revealed preference framework for dynamic hedonic valuation, deriving necessary and sufficient conditions for rationalisability over characteristics. The framework separates restrictions imposed by the hedonic price system from those imposed by intertemporal choice and provides diagnostics that quantify the severity of violations along each margin. Applied to household scanner data, I show that most failures of static hedonic valuation reflect violations of the hedonic price structure; conditional on satisfying this structure, allowing for habit formation improves behavioural fit. This alters the mapping from prices to willingness-to-pay and the implied welfare interpretation.

2026-03-02T22:57:30Z Josephine Auer