https://arxiv.org/api/Tho5kBvrVeVrS8ldKY/rfBDPbE8 2026-06-21T09:08:28Z 4059 120 15 http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.02306v1 2026-06-01T14:25:41Z

We study a population-wide tournament in which agents, who care both about their absolute and relative wealth, experiment by searching over correlated objects. We explore the role of the agents' beliefs about the environment; namely, the stochastic processes corresponding to their experimentation. We find that although optimism leads to higher output, it also produces greater inequality. We connect these observations with empirical evidence suggesting a positive relationship between inequality and entrepreneurship.

2026-06-01T14:25:41Z Cooper Howes Can Urgun Mark Whitmeyer http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.02095v1 2026-06-01T11:26:24Z

A decision-maker (DM) repeatedly makes choices under uncertainty in a bandit environment, where only the realization of the chosen arm is observed. Another competing agent, the adviser (AD), repeatedly provides recommendations, but the realizations of these recommendations are unobserved unless they coincide with the DM's choice. Both agents possess partial information about the arms' realizations. The central question we focus on is whether, in the long run, an outside observer can identify which agent is more informed based solely on the observed decisions, recommendations, and arm realizations. A test selects one of the agents based on the observed data. We focus primarily on the class of scoring tests, which assign a numerical score to each observation and select the agent according to the average score. We study strategic agents whose objective is to be selected by the test. For simultaneous arm choices, we show that there exists a scoring test that successfully identifies the more-informed agent. For sequential arm choices, however, no such scoring test exists. Finally, we explore the tension between identifying the more-informed agent and maximizing welfare. A DM whose objective is to pass the test may not necessarily make welfare-maximizing decisions. In a binary-arm environment, we show that no scoring test can simultaneously identify the more informed agent and achieve more than half of the welfare attained by welfare-maximizing decisions.

2026-06-01T11:26:24Z Yakov Babichenko http://arxiv.org/abs/2501.13721v6 2026-06-01T08:37:13Z

Consumer heterogeneity in revealed-preference data is larger than bilateral rationality tests can reveal. We construct a continuous nonparametric metric of this hidden heterogeneity by repeatedly subsampling choices, partitioning agents into groups whose pooled data are jointly rationalisable under a chosen consistency criterion and recording how often each pair is co-classified. The resulting kernel is positive semi-definite, embeds the population in a Hilbert space, and induces a metric with the triangle inequality. Under a necessary-and-sufficient contrast-rank condition, its spectral structure recovers latent preference types. Inference on demographic correlates proceeds via a Monte-Carlo-conditional test and a finite-sample-valid permutation test. Applied to US grocery scanner data, the construction reveals a joint-rationality gap of 0.62 between near-saturated pairwise compatibility and population-level co-typing; binary lottery data yield a comparable gap of 0.38. Standard demographics organise only a modest part of the scanner kernel structure.

2025-01-23T14:53:59Z Avner Seror http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.09967v2 2026-05-31T22:11:32Z

We study a monopolistic insurance market with hidden information, where the agent's type $θ$ is private information that is unobservable to the insurer, and it is drawn from a continuum of types. The hidden type affects both the loss distribution and the risk attitude of the agent. Within this framework, we show that a menu of contracts is incentive efficient if it maximizes social welfare function, subject to incentive compatibility and individual rationality constraints. This holds for general utility functionals. In the special case of Yaari Dual Utility, we provide two partial converse statements to this result, and we give a semi-explicit characterization of optimal solutions to the social welfare maximization problem. We do this under two different settings: (i) the first assumes that types are ordered in a way such that larger values of $θ$ correspond to more risk-averse types who face stochastically larger losses; whereas (ii) the second assumes that larger values of $θ$ correspond to less risk-averse types who face stochastically larger losses. In both settings, the structure of optimal menus of contracts depends on the level of the social welfare weight, and we examine several properties thereof.

2026-02-10T16:55:52Z Maria Andraos Mario Ghossoub http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.10112v2 2026-05-31T20:01:30Z

In a strategy-proof mechanism, the influence of an agent may be measured as the set of outcomes an agent can bring about by varying her (reported) type. More specifically, we refer to an agent's influence on her own relevant outcomes as her freedom, and to the influence on outcomes relevant for other agents as her power over others. The framework generalises both the notion of opportunity set from the freedom of choice literature, and established power indices for binary voting. It identifies constrained efficient mechanisms as those that maximise agents' freedom. Applying our framework to the analysis of assignment rules, we provide novel characterisations of the top trading cycles rule and bipolar serial dictatorships in terms of their freedom and power properties.

2025-12-10T22:05:01Z Christian Basteck Ulysse Lojkine http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.01424v1 2026-05-31T19:47:40Z

We study optimal technology regulation when private learning occurs both through doing (scaling up the technology) and through waiting (as time passes). We show that an adaptive speed limit -- a cap on the rate at which the technology can increase per-unit time -- delivers optimal worst-case guarantees over all learning processes and/or preferences, and is the only time-consistent mechanism that does so.

2026-05-31T19:47:40Z Andrew Koh Sivakorn Sanguanmoo http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.01390v1 2026-05-31T18:29:07Z

We introduce and analyze Limit Continuous Poker, a variant of Von Neumann's Continuous Poker with variable but limited bet sizes. This simplified variant of poker captures aspects of information asymmetry, bluffing, balancing, and the impact of bet size limits while still being simple enough to solve analytically. We derive the Nash equilibrium strategy profile for this game, showing how the bettor's and caller's strategies depend on the bet size limits. We demonstrate that as the bet size limits approach extreme values, the strategy profile converges to those of other continuous poker variants. Finally, we connect these results to strategic implications of limited bet sizing in real-world poker.

2026-05-31T18:29:07Z 49 pages, 14 figures Andrew Spears http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.22945v2 2026-05-31T15:28:36Z

We propose a novel framework for measuring privacy from a Bayesian game-theoretic perspective. This framework enables the creation of new, purpose-driven privacy definitions that are rigorously justified, while also allowing for the assessment of existing privacy guarantees through game theory. We show that pure and probabilistic differential privacy are special cases of our framework, and provide new interpretations of the post-processing inequality in this setting. Further, we demonstrate that privacy guarantees can be established for deterministic algorithms, which are overlooked by current privacy standards.

2026-01-30T13:03:21Z 24 pages, accepted as regular paper in ICML 2026 Proceedings of the 43rd International Conference on Machine Learning, Seoul, South Korea. PMLR 306, 2026 Joshua J Bon James Bailie Judith Rousseau Christian P Robert http://arxiv.org/abs/1904.09888v3 2026-05-31T15:00:54Z

Penney's game is a two-player zero-sum game in which each player chooses a three-flip pattern of heads and tails, and the winner is the player whose pattern occurs first in repeated tosses of a fair coin. Because the players choose sequentially, the second mover has the advantage. In fact, for any three-flip pattern, there is another three-flip pattern that is strictly more likely to occur first. This paper provides a novel no-arbitrage argument that generates the winning odds corresponding to any pair of distinct patterns. The resulting formula is equivalent to that generated by Conway's ``leading number'' algorithm. The accompanying betting-odds intuition adds insight into why Conway's algorithm works. The proof is simple and easy to generalize to games involving more than two outcomes, unequal probabilities, and competing patterns of various lengths. Additional results on the expected duration of Penney's game are presented.

2019-03-28T18:01:15Z 15 page body Miller, J.B. Penney's game odds from no-arbitrage. Theory and Decision (2026) Joshua B. Miller 10.1007/s11238-026-10123-w http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.01250v1 2026-05-31T14:05:04Z

A single seller offers one or more goods to a single buyer. The buyer's values and the seller's costs are private information. Each player has a commonly known prior over the other player's value or cost, supported on a finite set. What is the optimal selling mechanism? We argue that, despite this question's importance and apparent simplicity, prior work offers no satisfactory answer. If the seller simply chooses an optimal menu given her realized costs, she fails to exploit her informational advantage. At the other extreme, the optimal trade mechanism that satisfies IC/IR constraints for both parties fails in practice, as it conditions prices on the seller's unknown costs in an unenforceable way. The seller's realistic capabilities lie somewhere in between: she may leverage private information but lacks unlimited commitment power. To bridge this gap, we consider a solution concept built on the realistic assumption that the seller can commit to prices but nothing more. Similar -- albeit technically distinct -- solution concepts have been studied in the context of auctions with multiple buyers. Our concept proves surprisingly rich even with a single buyer. In our model, the buyer and seller engage in multiple rounds of cheap talk before the seller posts a menu of priced bundles. The buyer then purchases. We measure value as profit for the seller and consumer surplus for the buyer. We prove that with a single good cheap talk cannot help either party, but show that it creates value in any extension of this canonical setting: multiple goods, multiple units, interdependent values, or repeated play. We also show that multiple rounds of communication can yield strictly higher expected profit than a single round. Finally, we discuss how realistic factors beyond our stripped-down model combine with cheap talk to enhance this value even further.

2026-05-31T14:05:04Z Jamie Tucker-Foltz Richard Zeckhauser http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.00972v1 2026-05-31T03:08:29Z

While risk pooling lowers the total cost of risk, efficiency alone does not make a pool viable. Participants need terms that ensure their participation, that are immune to subgroups breaking away, and that allow new members to join. Under cash-additive risk measures, the minimum cost of a coalition's risk determines the value created by that coalition, and deterministic side payments redistribute that value among participants. Institutional risk sharing is thus a transferable-utility cooperative game. We prove that the game is totally balanced whenever the risk measures are convex (agents are risk averse), so every coalition has a nonempty core and stable allocations always exist. We then analyze entry monotonicity through Population-Monotonic Allocation Schemes (Sprumont, 1990), a strong requirement that is notoriously difficult to construct and has received limited attention in risk sharing. We find several structural conditions that ensure that either the Arrow--Debreu pricing surplus allocation rule or the proportional-cost surplus allocation rule satisfies this entry-monotonicity property, the latter being a novel cooperative notion we propose. These verifiable structural conditions naturally arise in pooled (re)insurance and credit portfolios, providing pool designers with a practical toolkit for building risk pools that remain stable and attractive as they expand.

2026-05-31T03:08:29Z Christopher Blier-Wong Jean-Gabriel Lauzier http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.00970v1 2026-05-31T03:01:48Z

We study risk-neutral control in Markov decision processes with an absorbing catastrophic state. Even though rewards are linear and the agent has no utility curvature, probability weighting, or framing dependence, standard Bellman optimality produces three prospect-theory-like signatures: an S-shaped value-function profile (convex near catastrophe, concave in the far field), an endogenous loss-sensitivity coefficient $λ^*(S) > 1$, and a reflection-effect policy reversal. Across 495 configurations, the optimal policy plays safe near catastrophe in positive-drift (growth) regimes despite the risky action's higher immediate expected value, and plays risky near catastrophe in negative-drift (decline) regimes despite the safe action's lower immediate expected loss. We derive a closed-form expression for the asymptotic loss-aversion plateau $\barλ$ that depends only on win probability $p$, payoff asymmetry $r = |Δ_\ell/Δ_w|$, and discount factor $β$, and matches numerical solutions to $R^2 = 0.999$. The mechanism does not require asymmetric payoffs. Across a sweep of $(p,β)$ at three asymmetry levels, the asymmetry share of $\barλ$ above unity has median 4.6% at $r = 1.25$ and rises to 13.9% at $r = 2$, with the boundary contribution exceeding the asymmetry contribution in every cell tested. The phenomena persist under tabular Q-learning (a model-free agent reproduces $V^*$ at correlation 0.98 in growth and 1.00 in decline) and under stochastic transitions with Gaussian, heavy-tailed Student-$t_3$, and asymmetric skew-normal noise up to 50% of the step size, where the asymptotic plateau tracks the closed-form prediction within 0.41% for safe-channel noise and within 9.6% for risky-channel or both-channel noise. These results identify absorbing failure states as a sufficient structural mechanism for prospect-theory-like behavior under optimal control.

2026-05-31T03:01:48Z Yujiao Chen http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.00478v2 2026-05-31T00:04:59Z

This paper establishes existence of equilibrium in a measure-theoretic general equilibrium (MGE) model with production, bads, and comprehensive externalities. These features are jointly essential for modeling perfect competition in which emissions of production byproducts impose harm on agents. We show that, when bads and externalities are modeled in an economically natural way, equilibrium exists. This yields the first existence theorem with bads for MGE models, the benchmark for perfect competition, overcoming Hara (2005)'s nonexistence example. The proof uses nonstandard analysis, which provides a systematic technique to extend results for finite to infinite models.

2025-11-01T10:07:27Z Robert M. Anderson Haosui Duanmu M. Ali Khan Metin Uyanik http://arxiv.org/abs/1802.04595v10 2026-05-30T14:32:51Z

The price system is often said to economize on information. This paper asks how much information it saves. I develop a formal framework for measuring the informational burden that agents would have to bear if they had to reason individually over feasible coalitional alternatives. Taking the convergence theorem of Debreu and Scarf (1963) as the benchmark, I ask how much coalition-feasibility information must be held, and how it must be distributed, for individual acceptance decisions to recover the core. Agents' information is represented as finite sets of meaning-bearing sentences in a formal language, and reasoning is modeled as proof in Gentzen's sequent calculus. The main result characterizes the minimal informational structure under which unanimous acceptability coincides with the core for all transferable-utility games on a fixed player set: every coalition must be known to at least one of its members. Removing information about even a single coalition from all of its members suffices to break the equivalence for some game. Applying this result to the $k$-fold replica economy, I identify and count the load-bearing coalitions whose feasibility information must be distributed across the population. The associated average per-agent informational burden grows as $Θ(4^k/k^{3/2})$ -- exponentially in the size of the economy. This is, precisely and formally, what the price system saves.

2018-02-13T12:49:12Z Shuige Liu http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.31072v1 2026-05-29T09:39:06Z

We develop a game-theoretic framework that compares welfare efficiency across three market mechanisms: continuous double auctions with transparent order books (lit exchanges), opaque order books (dark pools), and periodic batch auctions. Each mechanism is modeled as a queuing system where heterogeneous traders face trade-offs between the execution price, waiting costs, and transaction costs. Our main result establishes that under moderate arrival rates and bounded adverse selection, dark pools dominate both alternatives in aggregate ex-ante welfare. Observable order books create costly strategic timing games in which traders delay or rush submissions to optimize their position in the queue, generating wasteful social waiting costs. Opaque order books eliminate these timing games through information design. We formally characterize the equilibrium strategies in each mechanism and prove the welfare ranking $W^{DARK} > W^{LIT} > W^{BATCH}$. Extensions incorporate asymmetric information and endogenous venue choice. The results demonstrate how the information structure and the discipline of the service jointly determine efficiency in strategic matching environments.

2026-05-29T09:39:06Z 79 pages Irene Aldridge