https://arxiv.org/api/NVqPETTEUIvtURF+OUxrPI8uPjc 2026-03-22T13:15:21Z 3810 105 15 http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.21495v2 2026-02-27T17:11:44Z

Congestion pricing has emerged as an effective tool for mitigating traffic congestion, yet implementing welfare or revenue-optimal dynamic tolls is often impractical. Most real-world congestion pricing deployments, including New York City's recent program, rely on significantly simpler, often static, tolls. This discrepancy motivates the question of how much revenue and welfare loss there is when real-world traffic systems use static rather than optimal dynamic pricing. We address this question by analyzing the performance gap between static (simple) and dynamic (optimal) congestion pricing schemes in two canonical frameworks: Vickrey's bottleneck model with a public transit outside option and its city-scale extension based on the Macroscopic Fundamental Diagram (MFD). In both models, we first characterize the revenue-optimal static and dynamic tolling policies, which have received limited attention in prior work. In the worst-case, revenue-optimal static tolls achieve at least half of the dynamic optimal revenue and at most twice the minimum achievable system cost across a wide range of practically relevant parameter regimes, with stronger and more general guarantees in the bottleneck model than in the MFD model. We further corroborate our theoretical guarantees with numerical results based on real-world datasets from the San Francisco Bay Area and New York City, which demonstrate that static tolls achieve roughly 80-90% of the dynamic optimal revenue while incurring at most a 8-20% higher total system cost than the minimum achievable system cost.

2026-02-25T02:07:36Z Devansh Jalota Xuan Di Adam N. Elmachtoub http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.19331v2 2026-02-27T08:13:49Z

In this paper, we characterize the extreme points of a class of multidimensional monotone functions. This result is then applied to large contests, where it provides a useful representation of optimal allocation rules under a broad class of distributional preferences of the contest designer. In contests with complete information, the representation significantly simplifies the characterization of the equilibria.

2026-01-27T08:16:16Z Giovanni Valvassori Bolgè http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.14103v2 2026-02-26T23:33:15Z

I consider an environment in which a decision maker faces uncertainty and privately holds information in the form of a signal about the true state of the world. The decision maker purchases additional information from a data broker before receiving the signal realization. I characterize the data broker's optimal selling mechanism, which involves screening over all possible signals. I allow the space of all signals the data broker can sell to be arbitrarily correlated with the signal the decision maker owns. This plays a key role in designing the optimal menu. In the binary action setting, the data broker extracts the efficient surplus by offering a distinct binary signal for each type. Moreover, this result holds even when the broker does not know the prior distribution over states. In more general environments, I provide conditions on the payoff structure and the decision maker's type space under which the data broker extracts the efficient surplus. I discuss scenarios in which efficient surplus extraction is not possible.

2025-11-18T03:40:46Z Arlindo Skënderaj http://arxiv.org/abs/2312.02055v2 2026-02-26T15:40:43Z

We study equilibrium investment into bidding and latency reduction for different sequencing policies. For a batch auction design, we observe that bidders shade bids according to the likelihood that competing bidders land in the current batch. Moreover, in equilibrium, in the ex-ante investment stage before the auction, bidders invest into latency until they make zero profit in expectation. We compare the batch auction design to continuous time bidding policies (time boost) and observe that (depending on the choice of parameters) they obtain similar revenue and welfare guarantees.

2023-12-04T17:14:06Z Christoph Schlegel http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.23098v1 2026-02-26T15:14:41Z

Recent papers in communication games construct equilibria by conditioning an agent's strategy on private, payoff-irrelevant information. I prove this is impossible in general games if there is any amount of realistic privacy in agents' preferences, generalizing previous results from cheap talk games to mediated cheap talk and communication with receiver commitment. Applying the result to repeated games with public+conditionally independent private monitoring, all equilibria without private randomization are perfect public equilibria, and non-trivial belief free equilibria are impossible. This result can be avoided if information is slightly correlated, or pay-off relevant. Due to undesirable properties of public perfect equilibria in some settings, I argue for further study of belief-based equilibria to understand equilibria of repeated games with noisy monitoring.

2026-02-26T15:14:41Z Alistair Barton http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.02592v2 2026-02-26T13:06:53Z

Real-world contracts are often ambiguous. While recent work by Dütting, Feldman, Peretz, and Samuelson (EC 2023, Econometrica 2024) demonstrates that ambiguous contracts can yield large gains for the principal, their optimal solutions often require deploying an impractically large menu of contracts. This paper investigates \emph{succinct} ambiguous contracts, which are restricted to consist of at most $k$ classic contracts. By letting $k$ range from $1$ to $n-1$, this yields an interpolation between classic contracts ($k=1$) and unrestricted ambiguous contracts ($k=n-1$). This perspective enables important structural and algorithmic results. First, we establish a fundamental separability property: for any number of actions $n$ and any succinctness level $k$, computing an optimal $k$-ambiguous contract reduces to finding optimal classic contracts over a suitable partition of the actions, up to an additive balancing shift acting as a base payment. Second, we show bounds on the principal's loss from using a $k$-ambiguous rather than an unrestricted ambiguous contract, which uncover a striking discontinuity in the principal's utility regarding contract size: lacking even a single contract option may cause the principal's utility to drop sharply by a multiplicative factor of $2$, a bound we prove to be tight. Finally, we characterize the tractability frontier of the optimal $k$-ambiguous contract problem. Our separability result yields a poly-time algorithm whenever the number of partitions of $n-1$ actions into $k$ sets is polynomial, recovering and extending known results for classic and unrestricted ambiguous contracts. We complement this with a tight hardness result, showing that the problem is \textsf{NP}-hard whenever the number of partitions is super-polynomial. Moreover, when $k \approx n/3$, the problem is even hard to approximate.

2025-03-04T13:17:13Z Paul Duetting Michal Feldman Yarden Rashti http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.22836v1 2026-02-26T10:22:41Z

This paper embeds a signaling friction into the continuous-time heterogeneous agent framework. A continuum of producers operate Cobb-Douglas technologies with regime-specific productivity $A_j \in \{A_L, A_H\}$. Stochastic arrival of signaling opportunities and skill obsolescence risk generate an optimal stopping problem -- when to pay a lump-sum cost $φ$ to upgrade productivity -- whose solution yields an endogenous Skiba threshold $k^*$. Diminishing returns create a stable interior attractor in each regime; the signaling cost separates the two basins, producing a poverty trap that is an interior optimum rather than a corner solution. The stationary distribution exhibits Twin Peaks, but its decomposition by regime reveals that agents in three distinct states -- structurally trapped, waiting to signal, and successfully upgraded -- coexist at the same wealth levels with different consumption behavior and mobility prospects. Capital alone is therefore insufficient to identify an agent's position in the polarization dynamics. We show that the joint observation of a low marginal propensity to consume out of wealth and a high average propensity to consume -- a combination invisible to standard Euler equation tests -- is the diagnostic signature of the structural trap, distinguishing it from both liquidity constraints and transitory shocks.

2026-02-26T10:22:41Z 3 figures Massimo Giannini http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.23402v1 2026-02-26T08:46:29Z

We construct a stochastic dynamical systems theory in which sustainability is a structural boundary property of a fully coupled Earth--Human--Production system. Each subsystem is modelled as a vector-valued process governed by stochastic differential equations with multiplicative noise and absolute bidirectional cross-subsystem flows. Biodiversity is endogenous, and societal evaluation is represented by a reflexive functional whose weights depend on evolving human capabilities. Sustainability, development, and sustainable development are defined as trajectory properties. Sustainability corresponds to boundary non-attainment with positive or unit probability; development corresponds to local ascent in the evaluation functional; sustainable development requires directional alignment under strictly positive survival probability. No optimisation problem is imposed. Necessary and sufficient conditions are derived using Feller boundary classification and stochastic Lyapunov methods. A central result identifies the sign of the net absolute cross-subsystem flow on each component as a phase-transition parameter: if negative near zero, the boundary is of exit type and almost-sure persistence is structurally impossible, independent of intrinsic regeneration, capability accumulation, or productivity parameters. Because flows are absolute, any perturbation diffuses through the entire coupled system without requiring correlated exogenous shocks. The reflexive evaluation structure generically induces non-transitive development relations, providing a formal mechanism for path-dependent welfare comparisons. Sustainability emerges as a geometric property of boundary structure and vector-field alignment, not as a corollary of intertemporal optimality.

2026-02-26T08:46:29Z Claudio Pirrone Stefano Fricano Gioacchino Fazio http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.10349v2 2026-02-26T02:02:40Z

In many auctions, bidders may be reluctant to reveal private information to the auctioneer and other bidders. Among deterministic bilateral communication protocols, reducing what bidders learn requires increasing what the auctioneer learns. A protocol implementing a given social choice rule is on the Privacy Frontier if no alternative protocol reveals less to both bidders and the auctioneer. For first-price auctions, the descending protocol and the sealed-bid protocol are both on the Privacy Frontier. For second-price auctions, the ascending protocol and the ascending-join protocol of Haupt and Hitzig (2025) are both on the Privacy Frontier, but the sealed-bid protocol is not. We provide sufficient conditions for a protocol to be on the Privacy Frontier and devise alternative protocols on the Privacy Frontier for first-price auctions that allow the designer to flexibly trade off between privacy from bidders and the auctioneer.

2025-11-13T14:22:59Z 43 pages Eric Gao Eric Tang http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.03009v2 2026-02-26T00:27:11Z

We present an entirely new physics founded approach to estimating the social cost of carbon (SCC). For this, we developed our Ocean-Heat-Content Physics and Time Macro Economic Model (OPTiMEM) to estimate future heat content (separately published). The heat conjecture assumes that weather damages curves are stochastically proportional to ocean heat increase. We model carbon combustion, validate to datasets for greenhouse gas (GHG), temperature, and ocean heat content (OHC). We show that the social cost of 4 GHGs: CO2, CH4, N2O and halogenated hydrocarbons, cannot be single values, but must be represented by a kind of economic phase space. We propose very long-term carbon bonds to implement real discounting. This obviates the Gordian knot of the descriptivist versus prescriptivist discount disagreement that is unsolvable. Implementing these bonds leads to a new monitoring metric: real-dollar spending and bond discount rates compared to SC-GHG cost with variation on the discount scale, where the discount has no relationship to the pure rate of time preference (PRTP). This heat conjecture is based on OPTiMEM. OPTiMEM initiates from a fossil fuel consumption function to produce CO2, with 18 scenarios implemented to provide the uncertainty range. We provide 1:N year loss risk models (1:10, 1:100, 1:1000) that government, engineers, and actuaries should find useful. A scenario implementing DICE family of models carbon and growth assumptions shows +18° C is breached by 2210 CE, and +110° C by 2300 CE -- both of which outcomes are obviously not compatible with the fairly rosy conclusions of DICE models. Concerns are raised about having enough low-cost fossil fuel for conversion to minimal CO$_2$ maximal energy return on energy invested (EROEI) power if nations wait too long, and low EROEI power is questioned because monetary value is dependent on energy.

2026-02-03T02:23:14Z 42 pages, 30 pages of text, 8 figures, 2 tables, 16 equations Brian Hanley Pieter Tans Edward A. G. Schuur Geoffrey Gardiner Steve Keen Adam Smith http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.06085v4 2026-02-26T00:15:21Z

Despite well-meaning scenarios that propose global CO2 emissions will decline presented in every IPCC report since 1988, the trend of global CO2 increase continues without significant change. Even if any individual nation manages to flatten its emissions, what matters is the trajectory of the globe. Together the gulf between climate science and climate economics, plus the urgent need for alternative methods of estimation, provided the incentives for development of our Ocean-Heat-Content (OHC) Physics and Time Macro Economic Model (OPTiMEM) system. To link NOAA damages to climate required creating a carbon consumption model to drive a physics model of climate. How fast could carbon be burned and how much coal, oil and natural gas was reasonably available? A carbon model driving climate meant burning the carbon, and modelling how the earth heated up. We developed this using the most recent best greenhouse gas equations and production models for CO2, CH4, N2O, and halogenated gases. This developed an ocean heat content model for the globe. Each step is validated against Known carbon consumption, CO2, temperature, and ocean heat content. This allows a physics founded model of climate costs to be projected.

2025-12-31T02:02:07Z 115 pages, 268 references, 59 figures, 32 tables, 46 equations Brian P. Hanley Butterfly Sciences Pieter Tans Institute of Arctic and Alpine Research University of Colorado Boulder Edward A. G. Schuur Center for Ecosystem Science and Society Northern Arizona University Geoffrey Gardiner London Institute of Banking and Finance Steve Keen Institute for Strategy, Resilience & Security, University College London Adam Smith Climate Central http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.11024v2 2026-02-25T22:09:36Z

We study the impact of endogenous attention in a dynamic social media model. Each period, a user observes a random story and decides whether to share it. Users like sharing true and interesting stories, but identifying false stories requires costly attention. Depending on parameters, the system exhibits either a unique limit or strong path dependence. Endogenous attention responds to changes in false story credibility, so reducing credibility can boost their prevalence. Increases in the exogenous production rate of false stories can be amplified by users' sharing decisions. Increasing users' capacity to reach others amplifies both true and false stories; we identify conditions under which the net effect favors truth over falsehood.

2024-06-16T17:46:27Z Tuval Danenberg Drew Fudenberg http://arxiv.org/abs/2312.00457v2 2026-02-25T12:55:13Z

We develop a model of social media in which users produce different types of content and choose whom to follow. Even when abstracting from algorithmic bias, linking costs shape networks and polarization. In the welfare-maximizing equilibrium, lower linking costs can raise welfare but also increase exposure to extreme content, while very low costs reduce welfare and heighten polarization by discouraging moderate contributors. Policies that incentivize content provision can generate large welfare gains by changing who produces information, whereas link subsidies or attention reallocation mainly affect exposure and have limited welfare impact. These insights help explain why exposure-based interventions on social media platforms often yield ambiguous effects on polarization.

2023-12-01T09:45:58Z Patrick Allmis Luca Paolo Merlino http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.09573v2 2026-02-25T09:31:49Z

Click-fraud is commonly seen as a key vulnerability of pro-rata revenue sharing rule on music streaming platforms, whereas user-centric is largely immune. This paper develops a tractable non-cooperative model in which artists can purchase fraud activity that generates undetectable fake streams up to a technological limit. We defend pro-rata by showing that it is fraud-robust: when fraud technology is weak, honesty is a strictly dominant strategy, and an efficient fraud-free equilibrium obtains; when fraud technology is strong, a unique fraud equilibrium arises, yet aggregate fake streams remain bounded. Although fraud is inefficient, the resulting redistribution may improve fairness in some cases. To mitigate fraud without abandoning pro-rata, we introduce a parametric weighted rule that interpolates between pro-rata and user-centric, and characterize parameter ranges that restore a fraud-free equilibrium under technology constraint. We also discuss implications of Spotify's modernized royalty system for fraud incentives.

2026-01-14T15:42:52Z Hao Yu http://arxiv.org/abs/2506.11838v3 2026-02-25T08:50:27Z

Mean Field Game (MFG) models implicitly assume "rational expectations", meaning that the heterogeneous agents being modeled correctly know all relevant transition probabilities for the complex system they inhabit. When there is common noise, it becomes necessary to solve the "Master equation", in which the infinite-dimensional density of agents is a state variable. The rational expectations assumption and the implication that agents solve Master equations is unrealistic in many applications. We show how to instead formulate MFGs with non-rational expectations. Departing from rational expectations is particularly relevant in "MFGs with a low-dimensional coupling", i.e. MFGs in which agents' running reward function depends on the density only through low-dimensional functionals of this density. This happens, for example, in most macroeconomics MFGs in which these low-dimensional functionals have the interpretation of "equilibrium prices." In MFGs with a low-dimensional coupling, departing from rational expectations allows for completely sidestepping the Master equation and for instead solving much simpler finite-dimensional HJB equations. We introduce an adaptive learning model as a particular example of non-rational expectations and discuss its properties.

2025-06-13T14:40:03Z Benjamin Moll Lenya Ryzhik