https://arxiv.org/api/gmb2/b1DqfFhRi3ytWlDJHbveQM 2026-09-11T17:46:58Z 4354 0 15 http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.11748v1 2026-09-10T16:03:00Z

Experimental evidence suggests that ambiguity-sensitive choice can vary systematically with the circumstances of a decision. This paper isolates one channel within a stable preference relation: ambiguity weighting may depend on the act's certainty-equivalent level. After the standard Anscombe-Aumann calibration of consequence utility, a set of behavioral axioms yields a unique continuous family of normalized monotone capacities $\{ν_v\}_{v\in(0,1)}$. Each nonendpoint act is evaluated by the Choquet integral associated with the capacity at its own interior certainty-equivalent level, while nonendpoint acts on the same indifference surface share the same capacity. Binary event comparisons identify local event weights at each elicited level and trace their cross-level variation, providing tests of the fixed-capacity restriction. Local uncertainty aversion is equivalent to convexity of $ν_v$ and yields an implicit multiple-priors representation with certainty-equivalent-indexed local cores. Certainty translation invariance holds if and only if the capacity is fixed across levels, recovering the maintained nondegenerate fixed-capacity Choquet expected utility benchmark; global mixture-betweenness yields implicit additive utility, and imposing both restrictions recovers full-support subjective expected utility. The capacity schedule is a reduced-form ambiguity weighting whose variation may reflect changes in ambiguity perception, ambiguity attitude, or both.

2026-09-10T16:03:00Z Kemal Ozbek http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.23288v3 2026-09-10T13:47:33Z

We study flow games with public arcs, an extension of classical cooperative flow games that allows players to use public resources. In these games, a coalition corresponds to a set of arcs, while certain arcs, called public arcs, can be used freely by any coalition. The value of a coalition is the maximum flow value achievable using the arcs controlled by the coalition along with the public arcs. We investigate two solution concepts, the least core and the nucleolus. Both solution concepts provide fair ways to allocate the value of the grand coalition among individual players. We provide polynomial-size formulations of the least core of these games. We also give a deterministic polynomial-time algorithm for computing the nucleolus, whether or not the core is empty.

2026-06-22T13:02:50Z Tianhang Lu Han Xiao Qizhi Fang http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.02031v2 2026-09-10T13:46:22Z

Two contestants with possibly different marginal costs compete across identical battlefields governed by a Tullock technology with discriminatory power at most one. A symmetric schedule divides a fixed prize according to the number of victories. Allowing for inactivity, unequal efforts across battlefields, and arbitrary mixed strategies, we prove the existence and uniformity of equilibrium. Equilibrium may be pure, semi-pure (one contestant mixes), or two-sided mixed; in a two-sided mixed equilibrium, each contestant uses at most countably many positive effort levels. Multiple equilibria with different structures can coexist while generating the same expected effort, prize share, cost, and payoff. For every admissible schedule and cost ratio, equilibrium is unique with six or fewer battlefields, whereas seven first permits multiplicity or two-sided mixing. We also characterize all equilibria under majority rule.

2026-09-02T03:01:14Z 45 pages, 7 figures Zhonghong Kuang Jingfeng Lu http://arxiv.org/abs/2105.11398v2 2026-09-10T12:31:42Z

This paper introduces $\mathbf{Gm}$, which is a category for extensive-form games. The category's objects are extensive-form games, each of which is regarded as a set of nodes which has been endowed with edges, information sets, actions, players, and utility functions. Its morphisms are functions, from source nodes to target nodes, that respect this structure. For instance, a game's information-set collection is newly regarded as a topological basis for the game's decision-node set, and then a morphism's continuity serves to respect the source game's information sets. Given these definitions, a game isomorphism is characterized as a bijection whose restriction to decision nodes is a homeomorphism, whose induced player transformation is bijective, and whose induced run transformation is monotonic with respect to the total preorder determined by each player's utility function.

2021-05-24T16:40:42Z 49 pages, 15 figures. Results essentially identical to those in Sections 2, 3.1, and 4.1 of version 1. Reworked, with cleaner definitions of out-tree and player transformation. (All versions entirely different from arXiv:2004.11196.). Version 1 was Western University (University of Western Ontario), Department of Economics Research Report 2021-2 Peter A. Streufert http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02776v3 2026-09-10T11:54:32Z

This paper studies how strategic communication shapes endogenous communication networks. Agents form costly links, observe noisy private signals about a common state, exchange cheap-talk messages with neighbors, and choose actions that reward accuracy and coordination. We show that full revelation is sustainable if and only if every connected component is a clique. We then characterize the core of the endogenous network-formation game with heterogeneous signal precisions and weakly convex linking costs. Although every network admits non-informative continuation equilibria, every core outcome is truthful and consists of assortative exclusive information clubs generated by a recursive precision-cost maximization procedure. The characterization follows from an individual payoff bound that holds uniformly over all continuation strategy profiles. Core-stable clubs need not be efficient: assortative sorting can concentrate high-precision signals excessively, so a more mixed partition may yield higher aggregate welfare.

2026-05-04T16:19:18Z Paolo Pin http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.11374v1 2026-09-10T11:10:54Z

We study a mechanism of cooperation in the Prisoner's Dilemma (PD). Incorporating social preferences as efficiency concerns into the PD game, we study how altruism translates into cooperation. Under complete information, cooperation requires the opponent's altruism to clear a threshold. We then introduce a subjective extension of Bayesian Nash equilibrium that relaxes the Common Prior Assumption, letting players hold heterogeneous, potentially misspecified beliefs about each other's altruistic type. Cooperation then depends on beliefs about altruism rather than altruism itself, and can be sustained even when opponents are, on average, only weakly altruistic. When fear of exploitation dominates the temptation to defect, beliefs about the opponent's cooperation become strategic complements, so a cooperative and an uncooperative equilibrium can coexist under identical payoffs and an identical, correctly specified prior. Using multiplier preferences, we then study how robust this belief-driven cooperation is to model misspecification. Cooperation is fragile: it survives only above a threshold level of confidence in one's own belief, and can unravel even when the belief itself correctly supports cooperation. As a formal extension, the same robust-control apparatus, applied to a player's action choice, nests Nash equilibrium, Bayesian Nash equilibrium, and logit Quantal Response Equilibrium as limiting cases. Cooperation depends less on how altruistic agents are than on what they believe about each other, and how confident they are that this belief is right.

2026-09-10T11:10:54Z Yosuke Hashidate http://arxiv.org/abs/2408.10077v4 2026-09-10T02:23:35Z

We study the welfare-maximizing allocation of heterogeneous objects when screening uses costly effort rather than monetary transfers. No-screening mechanisms perform well as object variety increases. In a symmetric continuous market with i.i.d. values whose CDF is log-concave, the multidimensional problem reduces exactly to a single-dimensional problem in agents' best-option values. More options make low best-option values rarer, weakening the case for screening. We characterize when no screening is optimal and show it remains optimal as variety expands. Large-variety limits and numerical results for finite, correlated markets support this pattern. We apply these results to propose an invitation-based vaccine appointment system.

2024-08-19T15:20:42Z Shunya Noda Genta Okada http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.08297v2 2026-09-09T19:28:51Z

We provide a strategic foundation for information: in any given game with incomplete information we define strategic quotients as information representations that are sufficient for players to compute best-responses to other players. We prove 1/ existence and essential uniqueness of a minimal strategic quotient called the Strategic Type Space (STS) in which a type is given by an interim correlated rationalizability hierarchy and represents a set of beliefs over other players' types and nature that rationalize this hierarchy and 2/ that the minimal STS has a recursive structure that is captured by a finite automaton.

2026-06-06T18:45:08Z Olivier Gossner Rafael Veiel http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.10759v1 2026-09-09T19:00:14Z

Society constantly has to determine the boundaries of what it deems acceptable, from legislative decisions to the guardrails governing autonomous systems. We initiate the axiomatic study of collective consent: given individuals' attitudes toward options, which options should receive societal consent? We organize our analysis around three principles: sufficient support, minority protection, and dominance by decisively better options. Each captures a distinct reason for withholding societal consent from an option. For each principle, we develop a corresponding solution concept that transparently implements the principle and is canonical in a mathematically precise sense. For example, for minority protection, the resulting concept is a consent-adapted version of Moulin's Proportional Veto Core. Balancing multiple principles simultaneously is more challenging. To address this, we develop a game-theoretic characterization of our veto core that naturally gives rise to a family of related concepts. From this family, we identify the Approval-Weighted Veto Core as particularly desirable. By making minorities' blocking power depend on the approval support of the options being challenged, it smoothly interpolates between proportional minority protection and majority support. Experiments on five datasets spanning high-stakes decision-making (such as political elections, ethical AI evaluations, and moral decision-making) show that solution concepts violating a principle in theory also violate it empirically.

2026-09-09T19:00:14Z 41 pages, 4 tables, 19 figures Chris Dong Sonja Kraiczy Rohit Vasishta Markus Brill Wesley H. Holliday Niclas Boehmer http://arxiv.org/abs/2209.13148v4 2026-09-09T17:44:44Z

A menu description exposes strategyproofness by presenting a mechanism to player $i$ in two steps. Step (1) uses others' reports to describe $i$'s menu of potential outcomes. Step (2) uses $i$'s report to select $i$'s favorite outcome from her menu. We provide novel menu descriptions of the Deferred Acceptance (DA) and Top Trading Cycles (TTC) matching mechanisms. For TTC, our description additionally yields a proof of the strategyproofness of TTC's traditional description, in a way that we prove is impossible for DA.

2022-09-27T04:31:42Z Yannai A. Gonczarowski Ori Heffetz Clayton Thomas http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.10499v1 2026-09-09T17:35:30Z

We study peer monitoring design in knowledge production. A principal leads agents who work on different but related tasks. By working on their own tasks, agents acquire information that is useful for evaluating their peers' performance. We consider robust contracts under which effort by all agents is the unique rationalizable outcome. The optimal contract induces a hierarchy of monitoring authority: agents easier for the principal to monitor directly are assigned greater authority to evaluate other agents. Task diversity improves information value but weakens peer monitoring. This tension distorts optimal public task assignment toward the principal's core expertise. Confidential random assignment relaxes this distortion by decoupling information production from the perceived monitoring structure.

2026-09-09T17:35:30Z Shota Ichihashi Fei Li Dihan Zou http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.05367v2 2026-09-09T12:53:28Z

We study how idiosyncratic firm-level shocks generate aggregate volatility and tail risk when they propagate through a production network under overlapping adjustment: new productivity draws arrive before the economy reaches the static equilibrium associated with earlier draws. Each innovation generates a `productivity wave' that mixes and dissipates over time as it travels through the production network. Macroeconomic fluctuations emerge from the interference between these waves of different vintages. The interference between these waves is governed by the dominant transient eigenvalue of the production network, and therefore so are the macroeconomic fluctuations they generate. In such a dynamic regime, the tail of the degree distribution is a markedly weaker determinant of macro fluctuations than in the fully adjusted static benchmark. And the macroeconomic significance of the degree-heterogeneity of production networks cannot be known without knowing the rate at which the economy converges to equilibrium or equivalently the spectral properties of the production network. More concretely, once we permit the time-averaging of shocks, granular shocks may account for only a small fraction of the empirically observed aggregate volatility.

2026-03-05T16:44:54Z Antoine Mandel Vipin P. Veetil http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.10074v1 2026-09-09T11:59:00Z

We investigate the strategic communication of narratives under model uncertainty. The sender has private information about the true data-generating process of publicly observable data. The receiver is uncertain about how to interpret the data, but aware of the sender's incentives to strategically provide interpretations (``narratives''). We theoretically show that the size of the conflict of interest between the sender and the receiver is a crucial determinant of equilibrium communication. In particular, the stronger the sender's bias, (i) the more senders exaggerate their information and (ii) the more receivers correct the sender's action recommendations. In a laboratory experiment, we find evidence in line with both predictions, suggesting that people in complex and uncertain environments take a narrator's strategic incentives into account. Additional analyses reveal that narrative likelihood does not drive receiver behavior and that narratives are, on average, slightly persuasive only when bias is low.

2026-09-09T11:59:00Z Gerrit Bauch Arthur Dolgopolov Manuel Foerster http://arxiv.org/abs/2110.10650v5 2026-09-09T11:57:52Z

We introduce an Attention Overload Model (AOM) in which alternatives compete for attention, so each alternative's consideration probability weakly decreases as the choice problem expands. This nonparametric restriction has a search-capacity foundation. We identify exactly which preference rankings are compatible with observed choices and establish sharp bounds on latent attention. We then consider heterogeneous preferences in settings where alternatives are presented in a list, establishing nonparametric identification results for attention and the distribution of preferences. We also develop high-dimensional inference and finite-sample methods for these models. Using the travel-mode experiment of Wang and Zhu (2025), we illustrate the methods and find that recovered pairwise preference shares closely match subjects' self-reported rankings.

2021-10-20T16:46:35Z Matias D. Cattaneo Paul Cheung Xinwei Ma Yusufcan Masatlioglu http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.10029v1 2026-09-09T11:01:50Z

In this paper we consider situations of (multidimensional) spatial majority voting. We analyze such situations having an even number (greater than or equal to 4) of voters and assume that each voter's preference over the set of policies is ``Euclidean": i.e., each voter has a most preferred ``ideal" policy and the voter's pay-offs from policies decrease as the (Euclidean) distance of the policies from the ideal policy goes up. We confine attention to voting situations for which the core has a single element belonging to the interior of the policy set. It is known that under conditions usual in this literature, this element of the core, generally, is not a Condorcet winner: i.e., there is at least one policy outside the core such that the core-policy cannot be reached from it by just one round of majority domination. We demonstrate that, however, under such conditions, starting from any policy in place, by a finite sequence of majority-dominations (we assume, implicitly, sincere voting) the policy in the core is reached eventually.

2026-09-09T11:01:50Z Anindya Bhattacharya Francesco Ciardiello