https://arxiv.org/api/NoINmUBTAiKOHxmFjqKvJ5MkNqM 2026-06-13T21:22:09Z 9885 150 15 http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.18496v1 2026-05-18T14:48:22Z

We introduce a dialect of the Asynchronous pi-calculus, called AWpi, in which (1) an input name may be owned, at any time, by at most one process; (2) each name has either only the input or only the output capability. As a result, special processes called wires (aka forwarders, that is, processes that receive values at one name and re-transmit) behave as substitutions when composed with any AWpi process. Thus AWpi naturally yields a category, whose morphisms are AWpi processes (modulo the reference behavioural equivalence, barbed congruence) and whose objects are types; and where wires act as identity morphisms. We show that the category of processes can be further organised into (sub)categories with the structures needed for the interpretation of common higher-order language features in the literature by drawing on insights from game semantics; notably, we construct a relative Seely category, the categorical structure that concurrent game semantics has. At the same time, AWpi follows the tradition of ordinary pi-calculi in that expressiveness is preserved and the operational and algebraic theory are developed in a similar manner, notwithstanding substantial technical differences in their development and proofs. In short, the goal of AWpi is to remain faithful to the operational and algebraic tradition of the pi-calculi while connecting to the tradition of denotational models for programming languages.

2026-05-18T14:48:22Z Ken Sakayori UTokyo Davide Sangiorgi OLAS,DISI Simon Castellan EPICURE Pierre Clairambault LIS,CNRS http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.03033v2 2026-05-18T10:31:33Z

MetaML-style metaprogramming languages allow programmers to construct, manipulate and run code. In the presence of higher-order references for code, ensuring type safety is challenging, as free variables can escape their binders. In this paper, we present Contextual MetaML, \textit{the first metaprogramming language that supports storing and running open code under a strong type safety guarantee}. The type system utilises contextual modal types to track and reason about free variables in code explicitly. A crucial concern in metaprogramming-based program optimisations is whether the optimised program preserves the meaning of the original program. Addressing this question requires a notion of program equivalence and techniques to reason about it. In this paper, we provide a semantic model that captures contextual equivalence for Contextual MetaML, establishing \textit{the first full abstraction result for an imperative MetaML-style language}. Our model is based on traces derived via operational game semantics, where the meaning of a program is modelled by its possible interactions with the environment. We also establish a novel closed instances of use theorem that accounts for both call-by-value and call-by-name closing substitutions.

2026-02-03T03:01:40Z 43 pages, 6 figures Haoxuan Yin Andrzej S. Murawski C. -H. Luke Ong http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.17958v1 2026-05-18T07:12:44Z

Code reasoning refers to the task of predicting the output of a program given its source code and specific inputs. It can measure the reasoning capability of large language models (LLMs) and also benefit downstream tasks such as code generation and mathematical reasoning. Existing work has verified the effectiveness of reinforcement learning on the task. However, these methods design rewards solely based on final outputs or coarse-grained signals, and neglect the inherent consistency of the stepwise reasoning process in the task. Therefore, these methods often result in sparse reward or reward hacking, which limits the full play of enhanced learning capabilities. To alleviate these issues, we propose CodeThinker, a consistency-driven reinforcement learning framework for code reasoning. Specifically, CodeThinker has three key components: (1) a stepwise reasoning-aware model training module, which utilizes a consistency tracing paradigm as a template to synthesize training data that captures the stepwise reasoning process; (2) a dynamic beam sampling strategy, which aims to improve the quality of sampled outputs under a fixed sampling budget; and (3) a consistency reward mechanism that can effectively alleviate reward hacking. Experiments on three popular benchmarks show that CodeThinker achieves state-of-the-art performance across multiple LLMs. For instance, it outperforms the strongest baseline by 4.3% in accuracy when deployed on Qwen2.5-Coder-7B-Instruct. We also validate the effectiveness of CodeThinker on downstream tasks. Results show that, without additional training, CodeThinker obtains average accuracy gains of 5.33 and 3.11 percentage points on mathematical reasoning and code reasoning tasks covering 17 programming languages, respectively.

2026-05-18T07:12:44Z Under review Zhanyue Qin Jia Feng Yibo Lyu Yun Peng Dianbo Sui Cuiyun Gao Qing Liao http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.17914v1 2026-05-18T06:23:03Z

We propose a novel framework that provides constructive feedback to an LLM in the "guess-and-check" paradigm by formally verifying its own thinking process and detecting local reasoning errors. We apply this framework to the loop invariant synthesis problem. We prompt the model to produce a step-by-step natural language proof justifying its thinking process for the failed verification condition of its generated loop invariants. Then, we use an LLM to translate the reasoning steps into first-order logic implications, which can be checked automatically. An invalid implication pinpoints the exact logical flaw in the LLM's thinking process, which we then use to construct targeted feedback for refinement. We have implemented our approach in a tool called LORIS and evaluated it on a main benchmark suite of 460 C programs and an additional benchmark suite of 50 C programs each of which involves non-linear properties. On the main benchmark suite, LORIS solved 445 of the programs, and achieved an overall success rate of $93.1\%$. LORIS also demonstrates robustness on the challenging non-linear benchmark suite.

2026-05-18T06:23:03Z Accepted by ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems (TOPLAS). DOI: 10.1145/3806652 ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst. 48, 2, Article 8 (May 2026) Tianchi Li Zhenyu Yan Junhao Liu Peng Di Xin Zhang 10.1145/3806652 http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.17884v1 2026-05-18T05:45:01Z

We present two applications of egglog to mathematical optimization in JijModeling 2, a mathematical modeller whose internal representation is based on simply typed $λ$-calculus. First, we use egglog to improve $\LaTeX$ output for mathematical models expressed with higher-order functions. Python comprehensions are desugared into stream operations such as $\textsf{map}$, $\textsf{flat_map}$, and $\textsf{filter}$; emitting these terms directly produces unnatural mathematical notation. We reconstruct comprehension syntax by \emph{ensugaring} higher-order terms and use equality saturation with a custom cost model to minimize temporary variable rebindings. Second, we use egglog as a declarative engine for \emph{constraint detection}, extending the previous egg-based approach presented at EGRAPHS '25. Egglog's datalog-style rules let us express multi-step detection logic directly, without external Rust orchestration code. We encode parametrized constraints using \emph{Henkin-like constants} and propagate side conditions on subterms and indices through egglog facts. Finally, we show that the same ensugaring procedure also reduces large domain-set conditions before saturation, turning a problematic detection case from minutes or nontermination into a few seconds. Through these topics, we want to provide an example of an industrial application of egglog, demonstrate the trick to propagate the constraints using the ideas from mathematical logic, and show the importance of optimizing \emph{premises} of egglog rules to get practical performance in egglog programs.

2026-05-18T05:45:01Z To be presented at EGRAPHS '26 https://pldi26.sigplan.org/home/egraphs-2026 Hiromi Ishii http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.17401v1 2026-05-17T11:44:48Z

Multi-party object coordination - across object-capability systems, smart-contract platforms, distributed actors, and event-sourced architectures - is shaped by six structural properties: authenticated provenance, opaque encapsulation, atomic multi-object commit, deterministic replay, immutable history, and history-derived state. Existing systems compose subsets via separate layered mechanisms (RPC, capability ACLs, transaction coordinators, event journals, vat boundaries); each layer is well-studied but the combination is fragile. We present a minimal kernel which makes them jointly compatible. Our kernel is built from s-expressions, a uniform 'send' interface, transactions, and one primitive object distinction: *ephemeral* (caller's context inherited) vs. *persistent* (context switches to the target's kernel-assigned identity and append-only log). The kernel structurally classifies every send target into one of six cases without input from the caller - uniform caller interface, intensional kernel dispatch. Under kernel-faithful trust (the kernel runs its semantics as specified), this design holds all six properties as *kernel-level* against arbitrary programs - the kernel's transition function refuses states violating them. Opacity *against the operator* additionally requires operator-faithful trust (the operator accesses logs only via 'recall' and does not censor or reorder transactions); under kernel-faithful alone, five of six guarantees survive an unconstrained operator. Append-only logs underpin immutability, replay, and history-derived state; kernel-controlled persistent dispatch yields authenticated provenance and opacity; transactions deliver atomic coordination. Operator-adversarial deployments can be realized with a cryptographic compiler.

2026-05-17T11:44:48Z 17 pages. Companion preprint of Onward! Papers 2026 submission Christopher Goes http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.12893v2 2026-05-17T04:22:36Z

Hofmann (1999) introduced the functional programming language LFPL to characterize the functions computable in polynomial time using an affine type system. LFPL enables a natural programming style, including nested recursion, and has inspired the development of type systems for automatic cost analysis, linear dependent type theories, and efficient memory management in functional programming languages. Despite its prominence, there does not exist a self-contained presentation, let alone a full mechanization, of LFPL and its core metatheory. This article presents a modern account and mechanization of LFPL and its metatheory with the goal of being self-contained and accessible while streamlining the strongest-known soundness and completeness results. The soundness proof works with the language LFPL+, which extends LFPL with additional language features. The proof is novel, adapting a technique by Aehlig and Schwichtenberg (2002) to construct explicit polynomials that bound the cost of an LFPL+ expression with respect to a big-step cost semantics. The completeness proof shows that LFPL programs can simulate polynomial-time Turing machines while only relying on restricted forms of linear functions and lists. It has the same structure as the original proof by Hofmann (2002) but greatly simplifies the core argument with a novel stack-like data structure that is implemented with first-class functions and lists. The mechanization includes the full soundness and completeness proofs, and serves as one of the first case studies of mechanized metatheory in the recently developed proof assistant Istari.

2026-05-13T02:15:26Z This is the extended version of the article with the same title that appeared at the Forty-First Annual Symposium on Logic in Computer Science (LICS 2026). The difference to the LICS version is that the extended version contains an appendix with additional technical details Nathaniel Glover Jan Hoffmann http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.17119v1 2026-05-16T18:52:50Z

Programmers using native languages such as C, C++, or Rust can implement custom memory allocation strategies to improve execution time. In their paper titled "Reconsidering Custom Memory Allocation" almost 25 years ago, Berger et al. showed that while per-class allocators provide no significant speedups over a state-of-the-art general-purpose allocator, region-based allocators can improve execution time by allocating and freeing objects in bulk. This paper revisits that work on a modern hardware platform with modern general-purpose allocators to evaluate whether their conclusions still hold. It also augments the benchmark suite with two large real-world applications (Clang and Blender), and introduces a methodology to explore the effect of memory fragmentation on locality in general-purpose allocators. Our results support and extend the original conclusions, demonstrating the locality advantages of region-based custom memory allocators.

2026-05-16T18:52:50Z 11 pages, to appear at ISMM'26: https://doi.org/10.1145/3814942.3816132 Nicolas van Kempen Emery D. Berger 10.1145/3814942.3816132 http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.17008v1 2026-05-16T14:08:32Z

We introduce IsalProgram (Instruction Set and Language for Programming), a novel assembly-like programming language with three distinctive theoretical properties: (1) it is a regular language in the sense of formal language theory, meaning its programs are accepted by a finite automaton; (2) every finite string over the instruction alphabet is a syntactically valid program; and (3) it makes no explicit use of memory addresses or variable names, absolute or relative. Programs are finite sequences of tokens drawn from a fixed instruction set, and are executed on a virtual machine whose sole data structure is a circular doubly linked list (CDLL) navigated by three data pointers, with control flow governed by two code pointers. We give a complete formal definition of the language and its virtual machine, prove its regularity, and demonstrate its expressive power. We further discuss IsalProgram's potential advantages as a target language for neural program synthesis, the amenability of its program space to metric-based exploration via the Levenshtein edit distance, and directions for analyzing computability and complexity within this framework.

2026-05-16T14:08:32Z Ezequiel López-Rubio http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.16897v1 2026-05-16T09:17:23Z

Network simulation plays a crucial role in both networking research and industry. Existing commonly-used Discrete Event Simulations (DES) are based on callback mechanisms for discrete event (DE). However, due to the inability of callbacks to naturally simulate network events, programs in network simulation cannot be written in a sequential workflow. This leads to inherent complexity and poor maintainability, resulting in stack ripping and callback hell. These problems significantly increase simulation development workloads and introduce substantial cognitive loads associated with programming and debugging. To enable more efficient development of network simulation and facilitate the rapid evaluation and evolution of network functions, we propose a novel development paradigm for network simulation named ``CoDES" (\textbf{Co}routine-based \textbf{DES}). To the best of our knowledge, we are the first to focus on optimizing the network simulation development process rather than performance based on the coroutine mechanism. We implement a new network simulation framework based on CoDES that is capable of naturally simulating network events and effectively address key system challenges related to correctness, functionality, compatibility, and overhead. It enables developers to create sequential workflows for network programs and simplifies the code structure, thus reducing development workloads while enhancing code readability and maintainability. We apply this paradigm to a commonly used network simulator, NS-3 to implement Message Passing Interface (MPI), High Precision Congestion Control (HPCC), and Routing Information Protocol (RIP), achieving up to 62.3\% and 82.6\% reduction in code volume and structure complexity without sacrificing simulation accuracy, extending execution time or increasing runtime memory of simulation.

2026-05-16T09:17:23Z Yuanyi Zhu Zijian Li Xin Ai Zixuan Chen Sen Liu Yang Xu http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.16829v1 2026-05-16T06:15:47Z

Discrete diffusion models are a powerful, emerging paradigm for code generation. They construct programs through iterative refinement of partially corrupted token sequences and enable parallel token refinement. Importantly, this paradigm exposes a global program state at each denoising step, which provides a natural intervention point for enforcing program-level functionality and security constraints, guiding the generation before the final code is committed. Building on this observation, the paper introduces Constrained Diffusion for Code (CDC), a training-free neurosymbolic inference framework that integrates constraint satisfaction directly into the reverse denoising process. CDC augments the base discrete diffusion sampler with constraint-aware denoising operators that combine mathematical optimization with program analysis to identify constraint-relevant regions of the intermediate program state and locally adjust the denoising trajectory, steering generation toward feasible programs while remaining close to the base model. Across code generation benchmarks, CDC consistently improves constraint satisfaction in functional correctness, security, and even syntax, outperforming discrete diffusion and autoregressive baselines with less corrective computation and more localized edits.

2026-05-16T06:15:47Z Lize Shao Michael Cardei Zichen Xie Ferdinando Fioretto Wenxi Wang http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.16561v1 2026-05-15T19:04:02Z

Content composition vulnerabilities remain among the most prevalent and persistent classes of security weakness in deployed software. Prior mitigations, including developer training, static analysis tools, and domain-specific template languages, each face diminishing returns; AI code generation inherits these limitations and introduces new ones, reproducing insecure patterns from training data and lacking reliable context for self-correction. This paper introduces a general framework for secure content composition that extends across content languages and integrates directly into general-purpose programming languages via additive changes to string expression syntax. We define a language design goal of minimizing the lexical distance between secure and insecure idioms, and show that this goal admits practical compilation strategies: static analyses specified in terms of dynamic semantics, runtime performance approaching naïve string concatenation, and developer-facing diagnostics surfaced as compile-time errors or warnings. The approach enables an effective division of labor: security engineers encode composition hazards in libraries once; developers and AI coding agents select the appropriate library primitive to implement features correctly without needing to internalize specialist security knowledge; compiler diagnostics provide objective, position-keyed feedback that grounds both human review and iterative AI self-correction; and security responders focus on keeping libraries current rather than auditing ad-hoc security decisions distributed across a codebase.

2026-05-15T19:04:02Z 10 pages, 9 figures Mike Samuel Tom Palmer Shaw Summa Robert Grayson http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.15827v1 2026-05-15T10:27:07Z

Caesar is a deductive verifier for probabilistic programs. At its core lies HeyVL, a quantitative intermediate verification language based on the real-valued logic HeyLo. HeyVL allows users to express a probabilistic program, its specifications, and proof rules in a programming-language style, so that new proof rules can be easily integrated into the verifier. Caesar translates HeyVL programs into verification conditions, which are then checked using the Z3 SMT solver. It also includes a backend based on probabilistic model checking for a subset of HeyVL. We report on the results of five years of development of Caesar, highlighting its main features and architecture. In particular, we describe recent improvements such as additional proof rules, a model-checking backend, and better diagnostics.

2026-05-15T10:27:07Z To be published at CAV2026 Philipp Schröer Kevin Batz Umut Yiğit Dural Darion Haase Benjamin Lucien Kaminski Joost-Pieter Katoen Christoph Matheja http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.15406v1 2026-05-14T20:43:52Z

This work presents a new approach for implementing polymorphism for bottom-up relational languages, without monomorphization. We begin by introducing semiringKanren, a bottom-up weighted relational programming language. We extend this base language to support polymorphism. We describe a new method to compile polymorphic semiringKanren programs into non-polymorphic ones, based on equality patterns and large-enough instances of polymorphic relations. We prove the correctness of this method. Finally, we consider existing work and suggest directions for future research.

2026-05-14T20:43:52Z 54 pages, for associated repo see https://github.com/sporkl/semiringkanren Dmitri Volkov http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.15143v1 2026-05-14T17:47:24Z

This paper investigates the algorithmic safety verification problem of infinite-state parameterized concurrent programs over a rich set of communication topologies. The goal is to automatically produce a proof of correctness in the form of a universally quantified inductive invariant, where the quantification is over the nodes in the topology. We illustrate that under reasonable assumptions on the underlying topology, the problem can be reduced to and solved as a compositional scheme, that is, the verification of the parameterized family is reduced to a set of local proofs, in a complete manner. We propose a verification algorithm, which is implemented as a tool, and demonstrate through a set of benchmarks over several different topologies that our approach is effective in proving parameterized programs safe.

2026-05-14T17:47:24Z Draft version with an appendix Ruotong Cheng Azadeh Farzan