https://arxiv.org/api/opOrE40/kIAfP9W2TEcIQbhGErM2026-07-21T21:24:56Z539712015http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.18167v1Optimal Calibration of Quantum Network Links2026-06-16T17:06:41ZThe reliable distribution of entanglement is essential for the effective operation of quantum networks. Due to fundamental differences between quantum and classical communication systems, it is necessary to develop specialised algorithms and protocols that also account for quantum-specific constraints. In this work, we focus on the issue of recalibration. As suggested by recent experimental studies, the process of local entanglement generation in a quantum link degrades over time due to environmental changes that have to be estimated and compensated via a calibration operation, during which the link is not available. Therefore, in such a quantum network, every link alternates between an activation period, during which it operates normally, and a calibration period, during which it cannot participate in the end-to-end entanglement distribution, thereby creating a trade-off between link quality (the fidelity of generated pairs, which decays during activation) and availability (the fraction of time the link is usable, which calibration reduces). We develop analytically a protocol for optimally assigning activation periods to each link in linear quantum repeater chains, subject to any general end-to-end fidelity requirements and local initial fidelity thresholds. Building on this foundation, we extend to general quantum networks, where multiple paths may cross at common links, proposing a heuristic approach evaluated in simulations and compared with a benchmark, numerical approach, and theoretical bounds.2026-06-16T17:06:41Z23 pages, 10 figuresVinay KumarClaudio CicconettiMarco ContiAndrea Passarellahttp://arxiv.org/abs/2606.17261v1The Right Call for Software Benchmarking: Consistent Decisions in Stateful Environments2026-06-15T20:11:47ZIn the perpetual pursuit of performance, modern computing systems rely ever more on stateful mechanisms to accommodate the dynamics of workloads and physical environments, bolstering efficiency but confounding benchmarking and thereby the optimization of software. Indeed, by their nature, adaptive mechanisms introduce temporal dependencies between measurements and render naive estimators of individual program performance biased. Observing that rectifying such biases necessitates speculative assumptions about system dynamics, we call for prioritizing performance differentials over absolute measures and formalize software benchmarking as the decision problem of identifying the fastest program, for which relative knowledge suffices. To this end, we propose simple experiment designs admitting consistent estimators of contrasts, whereby program-specific biases cancel under tenable assumptions. These designs asymptotically yield the correct decision and afford a robust methodology for finite-budget benchmarking in stateful environments, bearing broad implications for the development of performance-sensitive software.2026-06-15T20:11:47ZGábor Melishttp://arxiv.org/abs/2606.17145v1OpenGadget3 GPU solver tests2026-06-15T18:00:02ZWe present an in-depth evaluation of the scalability and accuracy of the GPU porting of the N-body code for hydrodynamic cosmological simulations \og. While technical details of our GPU porting were presented in Ragagnin et al. (2020), in this work we focus on assessing the accuracy of the ported modules: the short range gravity integrator, the different components of the hydrodynamic solver, and the conjugate gradient solver for thermal conduction. We ran several tests that gradually increase the number of physical modules included: a gravity-only cosmological simulation; a hydrodynamical shock tube test; a non-radiative zoom-in simulation of a galaxy cluster in a cosmological box; and a full-physics zoom-in simulation of a galaxy in a cosmological box. Comparing the results obtained with the GPU implementation to those from the classical CPU version, we find excellent agreement across all tests, with small differences on very small scales. For the individual physical modules, we find a GPU chip-to-chip speedup ranging from $\approx3-5$. For more complex cosmological and hydrodynamical setups, where a large number of physical processes and overheads contribute to the total workload, the observed total chip-to-chip speedup (with the same number of nodes and CPUs per node) is $\approx2-3$. We ran our tests on four different supercomputers: Leonardo Booster (CINECA), MareNostrum-V (BSC), SuperMUC-NG2 (LRZ), and the CIP cluster of the Faculty of Physics at the Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU).2026-06-15T18:00:02Z12 pages, 10 figuresAstronomy and Computing, Volume 57, 2026, 101131, ISSN 2213-1337A. RagagninG. S. KarademirF. GrothK. DolagL. M. BössT. CastroN. HariharanM. AielloL. Tornatore10.1016/j.ascom.2026.101131http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.16332v1SMEPilot: Characterizing and Optimizing LLM Inference with Scalable Matrix Extensions2026-06-15T07:35:20ZModern CPUs increasingly integrate matrix extensions, such as Arm Scalable Matrix Extension (SME), that provide high-throughput matrix execution within the CPU. For LLM inference, however, these units are not a universal replacement for conventional CPU cores: prefill, decode, attention, and KV-cache operations expose different arithmetic intensities, vector behavior, and layout requirements, while SME units and CPU cores still compete for shared memory bandwidth. This paper studies this mismatch through a roofline-based characterization of SME-enabled CPUs and uses the resulting model to guide operator-level execution choices. We present SMEPilot, an LLM inference engine that selects CPU-only, SME-only, or cooperative SME+CPU execution for each operator shape. SMEPilot partitions matrix work across SME and CPU cores at tile granularity, overlaps SME-suitable matrix stages with CPU-suitable vector stages in attention, and maintains layout state so packed tensor representations are reused rather than repeatedly rebuilt on critical paths. Across Llama-3.2-3B, Qwen3-4B, and Qwen3-30BA3B on phone, PC, and server platforms, SMEPilot improves end-to-end inference performance by up to 3.94$\times$.2026-06-15T07:35:20ZFeiyang ChenHaibo Chenhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2606.17111v1Fractional Verkle Trees: A Hypertree Decomposition and Verified Proof Serialization Architecture for High-Performance Blockchain State Accumulators2026-06-15T07:16:07ZModern blockchain state management faces a critical scalability bottleneck: maintaining cryptographic commitments over hundreds of millions of entries becomes computationally prohibitive. Ethereum's transition to Verkle Trees: polynomial commitment accumulators reducing proof sizes from O(width * depth) to O(depth) via constant-size IPA vector commitments, is a critical step toward stateless operation. Yet, current implementations exhibit pathological characteristics that burden home validators.
We identify four inefficiencies in the reference go-verkle implementation \cite{kaur2025goverkle, kaur2025goethereum}: (1) phantom node creation during non-existent account deletion; (2) 64-byte database keys triggering excessive LSM-tree compaction; (3) redundant memory copying in proof deserialization; (4) a Proof of Absence wire format incompatibility causing non-deterministic serialization.
We present Fractional Verkle Trees (FVT), a hypertree decomposition partitioning global state into N independent sub-accumulators coordinated by a Merkle commitment tree, achieving improved cache locality, zero-lock-contention goroutine-parallel commitment computation, and faster root recomputation (91 $μ$s vs $\sim$500 ms). We address each inefficiency via existence checks, 32-byte SHA256 node references, zero-copy reference-counted buffers, and HashMap-based lexicographic deduplication.
Benchmarks on Apple M1 Pro show 57\% heap allocation reduction (566,760 to 242,004 bytes per 10K proofs), parallel insertion at 2,433 ns/op, and network-wide elimination of 4.85 PB/year across 6,000 full nodes, advancing the Ethereum stateless roadmap.2026-06-15T07:16:07ZThis work was presented at the Ethereum Community Conference at Cannes, France, 2026, on behalf of Amazon Web Services. https://youtu.be/FHA5mfUOl5o?si=sFA6izcab3cQX4KMEkleen KaurEverton Fragahttp://arxiv.org/abs/2605.27599v2The Energy Blind Spot: NVIDIA's Flagship Edge AI Hardware Cannot Support Process-Level Energy Attribution2026-06-15T07:12:23ZAgentic AI workloads - where a single user goal triggers multi-step orchestration, tool calls, retries, and failure recovery - are being targeted for edge deployment, with NVIDIA, Dell, HP, ASUS, MSI, Acer, and Gigabyte all shipping GB10-based desktop AI systems in 2026. We recently demonstrated that orchestration structure dominates agentic energy cost, with workflows consuming 4.33x more energy per successful goal than linear baselines and OOI reaching 7.63x for multi-step reasoning tasks. Separately, Raj et al. show that CPU-side processing accounts for up to 90.6% of total latency and 44% of total dynamic energy in agentic workloads. We report a systematic energy-observability audit of the ASUS Ascent GX10 (GB10 SoC) and find that the platform exposes no CPU energy counter, no INA power-rail monitor, no IPMI/BMC, and no SCMI powercap protocol through any supported software interface. The only on-device energy telemetry is instantaneous GPU power via NVML. We further discover that the MediaTek firmware already computes per-rail energy internally via an undocumented ACPI interface (SPBM), but NVIDIA states there are "no plans to expose CPU rail information." On-device per-process energy attribution - as performed on x86 via RAPL - is therefore not reproducible on this platform through supported interfaces. We formalize a hardware requirements specification for energy-attributed AI, propose an interim calibration bridge for per-domain energy decomposition - confirmed on the Acer Veriton GN100 where CPU energy accumulators are live - and identify a standards-track path via SCMI powercap. Our findings motivate the low-carbon computing community to demand energy observability as a first-class hardware requirement.2026-05-26T19:15:21ZDeepak PanigrahyAakash Tyagihttp://arxiv.org/abs/2511.08577v3Think-at-Hard: Selective Latent Iterations to Improve Reasoning Language Models2026-06-14T05:29:30ZImproving the reasoning abilities of Large Language Models (LLMs), especially under parameter constraints, is crucial for real-world applications. Looped transformers address this by performing multiple latent iterations to refine each token beyond a single forward pass. However, we identify a latent overthinking phenomenon: most token predictions are already correct after the first pass, but are sometimes revised into errors in later iterations. We ask whether selectively skipping latent iterations can improve accuracy, and reveal significant potential with an oracle iteration policy that boosts performance by up to 7.3%. Motivated by this, we propose Think-at-Hard (TaH), a looped transformer optimized for selective iteration. TaH employs a lightweight neural decider to trigger latent iteration, only at tokens likely to be incorrect after the standard forward pass. During latent iterations, depth-aware Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) modules shift the objective from general next-token prediction to focused hard-token refinement. A duo-causal attention mechanism extends attention from the token sequence dimension to an additional iteration depth dimension, enabling cross-iteration information flow with full sequential parallelism. Experiments on nine benchmarks show consistent gains across math, QA, and coding tasks. With identical parameter counts, TaH outperforms always-iterate baselines by 3.8-4.4% while skipping iterations on 93% of tokens, and exceeds single-iteration Qwen3 baselines by 3.0-3.8%. When allowing <3% more parameters from LoRA and decider, the gains further increase to 5.3-6.2% and 6.1-6.8%, respectively. Our code is available at https://github.com/thu-nics/TaH.2025-11-11T18:57:02ZAccepted by ICML'26Tianyu FuYichen YouZekai ChenGuohao DaiHuazhong YangYu Wanghttp://arxiv.org/abs/2606.15535v1MADAR: An Address-Free Processor2026-06-14T01:31:27ZIn a modern processor, computing is the cheap part. Most of its area and energy go to \emph{addressing} -- moving operands to and from a register file and cache, and running the tags, ports, miss queues, and bypass networks that find a value where it was left. MADAR deletes that machinery by abolishing the address. All state circulates in rings of slots that advance one position per clock; instructions and data ride in the same slots; a value is named by its place in an orbit -- a \rp{} coordinate -- not by an address; a fixed station computes when a circulating instruction sweeps past its operands, on a schedule set at compile time; and a hierarchy of rings of increasing period replaces the cache hierarchy, movement between them scheduled rather than triggered by a miss. No prior circulating-store, dataflow, or statically scheduled machine combines all four of these. We define the execution model, validate it in a cycle-accurate register-transfer-level implementation, show it \emph{compilable} -- a constructive scheduler emits programs cross-checked against the implementation -- and price it with a first-order energy model. The payoff is clearest for AI acceleration: the multiply-accumulate at the heart of every matmul and convolution compiles to a streaming form whose energy per operation stays flat as the reduction grows, and the operand reuse that makes matrix multiplication efficient is carried by the ring-period hierarchy -- the memory hierarchy doing by rotation what a cache does by tags. MADAR is a new design point for any computation whose data movement is known before the program runs.2026-06-14T01:31:27ZMohamed Amine Bergachhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2605.29641v2Experimentation for Different Scheduling Policies on Queues: Mixed Differences-in-Q Estimators Based on Little's Law2026-06-14T00:15:28ZIn data centers, tasks are dispatched to various servers to evenly distribute the workload. When a data center considers implementing a new scheduling algorithm, it typically conducts an A/B test prior to deployment to assess the real-world impact of this new method. However, a straightforward A/B test might be interfered with so-called ``Markovian'' interference. We utilized the Differences-in-Q estimator, as developed by Farias et al. (2022), and introduced mixed Differences-in-Q estimators grounded in Little's Law. We show that our A/B testing methods significantly reduce bias and variance when testing various scheduling policies. Extensive simulations were conducted under scenarios like non-stationary arrival rates, heterogeneous service rates, and communication delays. These simulations highlight the robustness and efficacy of our A/B testing approach.2026-05-28T09:07:44ZNanshan JiaRamesh JohariNian SiZeyu Zhenghttp://arxiv.org/abs/2506.20686v2MegaFold: Efficient Training of Next-Generation 3D Attention Protein Models on Cross-Platform GPUs2026-06-13T21:36:20ZRecent advances in biomolecular modeling have been catalyzed by models such as AlphaFold3 (AF3), which introduce science-informed changes to the transformer architecture. Unlike transformers, a defining characteristic of AF3-style models is their 3D attention over 2D pairwise representations which produces tensors whose computation and memory costs scale cubically with sequence length. As a result, despite moderate parameter counts, AF3-style models are far more expensive to train than size-equivalent transformers, and are severely constrained by GPU memory capacity. Our characterization shows 3D attention fundamentally changes the training workload, causing massive 3D attention maps, complex inter-operator dependencies, kernel fragmentation, and heavy host-side data pipelines which differ substantially from LLM training, leading to poor utilization on modern GPU systems. Moreover, existing GPU optimizations do not adequately address these challenges due to complex cross-layer inter-operator dependencies introduced by 3D attention. Motivated by these challenges, we introduce MegaFold, a novel cross-platform system for efficient training of next-generation 3D-attention protein models. MegaFold combines a memory-efficient 3D-attention kernel, a communication-efficient sharding strategy for quadratic representations, fused operator implementations for critical execution paths, and a determinism-aware host-device pipeline that eliminates preprocessing stalls. Evaluation on both NVIDIA H200 and AMD MI250 GPUs shows that MegaFold enables training with up to 3.36$\times$ longer sequence lengths on 32 GPUs while reducing end-to-end execution time by up to 1.73$\times$ (NVIDIA) and 1.62$\times$ (AMD).2025-06-24T23:30:49Z13 pages, 12 figuresHoa LaAhan GuptaAlex MoreheadJianlin ChengMinjia Zhanghttp://arxiv.org/abs/2606.15136v1LLMs have Visualization Literacy: Now What? Experiments Exploring LLM Visualization Evaluation Capabilities2026-06-13T05:54:01ZAs Large Language Models (LLMs) become more popular within the visualization community, researchers increasingly leverage them for diverse visualization tasks such as design guideline suggestions and visualization evaluation. However, in order for LLMs to act as trustworthy and fair evaluators, we argue that LLMs would need to possess visualization literacy, be capable of following user instructions and uphold graphical integrity. We test the latest versions of the most prominent LLMs, specifically Anthropic's Claude (Opus 4.5), OpenAI's Generative Pretrained Transformers (GPT 5.2 Pro), and Google's Gemini (Gemini 3 Flash) on these features and find that while these models now possess visualization literacy, they still struggle with other features necessary for instruction following and graphical integrity. Using a modified Visualization Literacy Assessment Test (VLAT), our findings show that these recent LLMs have achieved greater than human-levels of visualization literacy in contrast to prior research. In order to test the models' abilities to follow instructions, we used few-shot and chain-of-thought prompting as proxies for instruction following tasks on evaluating visualization literacy and find that these specialized prompting techniques are becoming obsolete with respect to improving visualization literacy. Additionally, we experiment with the inherent ability of LLMs to evaluate misleading visualizations to test the models' abilities for upholding graphical integrity and find that without specialized or leading prompting techniques, the models struggle with being able to accurately identify whether a visualization is misleading or not. Our results further break down the performance of each model on these tasks, but the culmination of our findings force us to reconsider the current effectiveness of LLMs as visualization evaluators.2026-06-13T05:54:01ZChristian SetoJacqueline NguyenJiayi HongRoss Maciejewskihttp://arxiv.org/abs/2606.14566v1Extended Abstract: Re-Evaluating the Real-System Modeling Accuracy of Ramulator 2.02026-06-12T15:44:08ZCycle-level DRAM simulators provide accurate and flexible models for DRAM and memory controller operations and enable research on current and future memory systems. Therefore, they are critical for improving the performance, efficiency, and robustness of DRAM-based memory systems. Ramulator 2.0 (successor of Ramulator) is a highly modular and extensible cycle-accurate DRAM simulator that enables rapid exploration of new ideas in DRAM-based memory systems.
A MICRO 2024 best paper runner-up publication, A Mess of Memory System Benchmarking, Simulation and Application Profiling, which we refer to as "the Mess paper," with all three artifact badges awarded (including "Reproducible"), proposes a new benchmark to evaluate real and simulated memory system performance. While doing so, it makes strong negative claims about Ramulator 2.0 and shows unexpected results.
In this talk and the associated extended abstract, we demonstrate that these results and claims in the Mess paper are incorrect and are due to configuration and simulator usage errors made in the Mess paper. We describe four best practices to aid users and developers of simulation tools to avoid such issues in the future. We emphasize the importance of contacting simulator authors and developers when unexpected results are observed (especially and importantly before publishing such results), to ensure these simulators are used with correct configurations and as intended. Our investigation also aims to stimulate discussion on artifact evaluation practices and on mechanisms for correcting results and artifacts after publication. To aid future works and reproduction of all our results, we open source all our code and scripts at https://github.com/CMU-SAFARI/Cleaning-up-the-Mess. We refer the reader to our full ISPASS 2026 paper and its artifact for the complete analysis, detailed methodology, and extended results.2026-06-12T15:44:08ZThis is an extended abstract version of the full paper available at arXiv:2510.15744 (ISPASS 2026). Presented at the Third Tutorial on Ramulator and DRAM Bender, colocated with ICS 2026F. Nisa BostanciHaocong LuoAtaberk OlgunMaria MakeenkovaGeraldo F. OliveiraA. Giray YaglikciOnur Mutlu10.1145/3774895.3820146http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.08374v2Shifting the Sweet Spot: High-Performance Matrix-Free Method for High-Order Elasticity2026-06-12T09:29:06ZMFEM is a widely used finite-element library, but its native linear-elasticity Partial Assembly (PA) path still applies an $O((p+1)^6)$ contraction in the element operator, leaving the CPU operator-throughput sweet spot near $p\approx 2$ in our baseline measurements. This work closes this implementation gap for MFEM linear elasticity on affine tensor-product hexahedral meshes by integrating four well-established tensor-product PA optimizations (sum factorization, Voigt notation, macro-kernel fusion, and slice-wise loop reorganization) into MFEM's native linear-elasticity PA path. The resulting operator is evaluated in high-order GMG-PCG solves using MFEM's geometric multigrid (GMG) components. On AMD EPYC 7713, the optimized operator achieves $7\text{--}83\times$ kernel speedup and $3.6\text{--}16.8\times$ end-to-end speedup across $p\in\{1,2,4,8\}$. At fixed problem size, the kernel-time operator throughput peaks around $p=6$ and remains high at $p=8$, shifting the operator-throughput sweet spot to $p\ge 6$. The same trend is reproduced on Huawei~Kunpeng~920 (ARMv8.2). These results are accompanied by per-stage ablation and hardware-counter characterization; the implementation will be released on GitHub.2026-01-13T09:36:02Z23 pages, 6 figures; revised manuscript with narrowed claims, expanded related work and reproducibility details, and added GMG configuration and performance-context analysesDali ChangChong ZhangKaiqi ZhangMingguan YangHuiyuan LiWeiqiang Konghttp://arxiv.org/abs/2606.14008v1Pseudonym Scheme Based on Hybrid Certificates for Security Credential Management System in Vehicular Communications2026-06-12T00:59:42ZIn recent years, the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) and the European Telecommunications Standards Institute (ETSI) have developed a series of security communication standards for vehicular communications. These standards include mechanisms such as the Security Credential Management System (SCMS) and Butterfly Key Expansion (BKE) to protect vehicle privacy. However, these standards are mainly based on the Elliptic-Curve Cryptography (ECC), which may be vulnerable to attacks from quantum computing in the future. In response to this potential risk, this study proposes a hybrid certificate that combines the ECC with Post-Quantum Cryptography (PQC). This approach enables infrastructure systems to be built on cryptographic foundations that are more resilient to quantum-based attacks. Furthermore, this study presents a generalized pseudonym scheme that is compatible with various cryptographic algorithms for generating pseudonym certificates. This design aims to eliminate the possibility of inferring any correlation between the public key in a pseudonym certificate and that in an enrollment certificate. This study also conducts a comprehensive performance evaluation of the RSA, ECC, and PQC algorithms, particularly those standardized by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). The comparison considers factors such as message length and computation time. Based on the findings, this study recommends suitable pseudonym schemes that adopt hybrid certificates for secure and efficient use in vehicular communications.2026-06-12T00:59:42ZIEEE Canadian Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering (2026)Abel C. H. ChenF. J. HwangYu-Chih WeiChin-Chen ChangBon-Yeh Lin10.1109/ICJECE.2026.3692881http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.06142v3Protean Compiler: An Agile Framework to Drive Fine-grain Phase Ordering2026-06-11T23:01:47ZThe phase ordering problem has been a long-standing challenge since the late 1970s, yet it remains an open problem due to having a vast optimization space and an unbounded nature, making it an open-ended problem without a finite solution, one can limit the scope by reducing the number and the length of optimizations. Traditionally, such locally optimized decisions are made by hand-coded algorithms tuned for a small number of benchmarks, often requiring significant effort to be retuned when the benchmark suite changes. In the past 20 years, Machine Learning has been employed to construct performance models to improve the selection and ordering of compiler optimizations, however, the approaches are not baked into the compiler seamlessly and never materialized to be leveraged at a fine-grained scope of code segments. This paper presents Protean Compiler: An agile framework to enable LLVM with built-in phase-ordering capabilities at a fine-grained scope. The framework also comprises a complete library of more than 140 handcrafted static feature collection methods at varying scopes, and the experimental results showcase speedup gains of up to 4.1% on average and up to 15.7% on select Cbench applications wrt LLVM's O3 by just incurring a few extra seconds of build time on Cbench. Additionally, Protean compiler allows for an easy integration with third-party ML frameworks and other Large Language Models, and two applications of this two-step optimization show a gain of 10.1\% and 8.5\% speedup w.r.t. -O3 on CBench's Susan and Jpeg applications. Protean compiler is seamlessly integrated into LLVM and can be used as a new, enhanced, full-fledged compiler. We plan to release the project to the open-source community in the near future.2026-02-05T19:24:05ZVersion 3: Preprint version of the accepted work at ACM TACO 2026Amir H. AshouriShayan Shirahmad Gale BagiKavin SatheeskumarTejas SrikanthJonathan ZhaoIbrahim SaidounZiwen WangBryan ChanTomasz S. Czajkowski