https://arxiv.org/api/Fe9Ame9KgjGEVDSqm+BXFKRHpIc2026-06-24T11:13:16Z1273882515http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.08761v1Beyond the All-in-One Agent: Benchmarking Role-Specialized Multi-Agent Collaboration in Enterprise Workflows2026-05-09T07:47:07ZLarge language model (LLM) agents are increasingly expected to operate in enterprise environments, where work is distributed across specialized roles, permission-controlled systems, and cross-departmental procedures. However, existing enterprise benchmarks largely evaluate single agents with broad tool access, while existing multi-agent benchmarks rarely capture realistic enterprise constraints such as role specialization, access control, stateful business systems, and policy-based approvals. We introduce \textsc{EntCollabBench}, a benchmark for evaluating enterprise multi-agent collaboration. \textsc{EntCollabBench} simulates a permission-isolated organization with 11 role-specialized agents across six departments and contains two evaluation subsets: a Workflow subset, where agents collaboratively modify enterprise system states, and an Approval subset, where agents make policy-grounded decisions. Evaluation is based on execution traces, database state verification, and deterministic policy adjudication rather than natural-language response judging. Experiments with representative LLM agents show that current models still struggle with end-to-end enterprise collaboration, especially in delegation, context transfer, parameter grounding, workflow closure, and decision commitment. \textsc{EntCollabBench} provides a reproducible testbed for measuring and improving agent systems intended for realistic organizational environments.2026-05-09T07:47:07Z45 pagesTao YuHao WangChangyu LiShenghua ChaiMinghui ZhangZhongtian LuoYuxuan ZhouHaopeng JinZhaolu KangJiabing YangYiFan ZhangXinming WangHongzhu YiZheqi HeJing-Shu ZhengXi YangYan HuangLiang Wanghttp://arxiv.org/abs/2605.08750v1Communicating Sound Through Natural Language2026-05-09T07:25:54ZNatural language is widely used to describe, prompt, and control audio systems, but rarely serves as the representation carrying audio itself. We introduce lexical acoustic coding (LAC), a framework in which pre-trained LLM sender and receiver agents transmit sound through natural language. Under fixed system prompts, the agents write their own analysis and synthesis code, communicating only through a lexical sentence, shared vocabulary, and optional symbolic music structure. The sender analyzes an input waveform into interpretable, non-learned acoustic descriptors, quantizes each with a feature-specific interval vocabulary, and verbalizes the lexical code as English. The receiver parses the sentence back into lexical-acoustic constraints and renders a waveform through closed-loop refinement. The transmitted text serves as both a rich caption and as the transport representation itself. We frame LAC as a finite-rate lossy quantizer, exposing trade-offs between vocabulary size, rate, and fidelity. Experiments on short sounds and symbolic music transfer show that plain text preserves measurable acoustic structure while remaining interpretable, editable, and native to LLM-mediated communication.2026-05-09T07:25:54ZIncludes link to demo pageEmanuele RossiEmanuele RodolĂ http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.08722v1HULK: Large-scale Hierarchical Coordination under Continual and Uncertain Temporal Tasks2026-05-09T06:10:40ZMulti-agent systems can be extremely efficient when working concurrently and collaboratively, e.g., for delivery, surveillance, search and rescue. Coordination of such teams often involves two aspects: selecting appropriate subteams for different tasks in various areas, and coordinating agents in the subteams to execute the associated subtasks. Existing work often assumes that the tasks are static and known beforehand, where an integer program can be formulated and solved offline. However, in many applications, the team-wise tasks are generated online continually by external requests, and the amount of subtasks within each task is uncertain, e.g., the number of packages to deliver or victims to rescue. The aforementioned offline solution becomes inadequate as it would require constant re-computation for the whole team and global communication to broadcast the results. Thus, this work tackles the large-scale coordination problem under continual and uncertain temporal tasks, specified as temporal logic formulas over collaborative actions. The proposed hierarchical framework, HULK, consists of two interleaved layers: the rolling assignment of currently known tasks to subteams within a certain horizon, and the dynamic coordination within a subteam given the detected subtasks during online execution. Thus, coordination is performed hierarchically at different granularities and triggering conditions, improving computational efficiency and robustness. The method is validated rigorously over large-scale heterogeneous systems under various temporal tasks and environment uncertainties.2026-05-09T06:10:40ZAccepted to the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. 7 pages, 4 figuresQingyuan LuoJie LiMeng Guohttp://arxiv.org/abs/2603.29632v2An Empirical Study of Multi-Agent Collaboration for Automated Research2026-05-09T04:25:23ZAs AI agents evolve, the community is rapidly shifting from single Large Language Models (LLMs) to Multi-Agent Systems (MAS) to overcome cognitive bottlenecks in automated research. However, the optimal multi-agent coordination framework for these autonomous agents remains largely unexplored. In this paper, we present a systematic empirical study investigating the comparative efficacy of distinct multi-agent structures for automated machine learning optimization. Utilizing a rigorously controlled, execution-based testbed equipped with Git worktree isolation and explicit global memory, we benchmark a single-agent baseline against two multi-agent paradigms: a subagent architecture (parallel exploration with post-hoc consolidation) and an agent team architecture (experts with pre-execution handoffs). By evaluating these systems under strictly fixed computational time budgets, our findings reveal a fundamental trade-off between operational stability and theoretical deliberation. The subagent mode functions as a highly resilient, high-throughput search engine optimal for broad, shallow optimizations under strict time constraints. Conversely, the agent team topology exhibits higher operational fragility due to multi-author code generation but achieves the deep theoretical alignment necessary for complex architectural refactoring given extended compute budgets. These empirical insights provide actionable guidelines for designing future autoresearch systems, advocating for dynamically routed architectures that adapt their collaborative structures to real-time task complexity.2026-03-31T11:57:00ZYang ShenZhenyi YiZiyi ZhaoLijun SunDongyang LiChin-Teng LinYuhui Shihttp://arxiv.org/abs/2605.08670v1MIND-Skill: Quality-Guaranteed Skill Generation via Multi-Agent Induction and Deduction2026-05-09T04:15:57ZLarge language model (LLM) powered AI agents have emerged as a promising paradigm for autonomous problem-solving, yet they continue to struggle with complex, multi-step real-world tasks that demand domain-specific procedural knowledge. Reusable agent skills, which encapsulate successful problem-solving strategies, offer a natural remedy by enabling agents to build on prior experience. However, curating such skills has largely remained a manual endeavor, requiring human experts to distill rich domain knowledge into actionable guidelines. In this work, we present $\textbf{M}$ulti-agent $\textbf{IN}$duction and $\textbf{D}$eduction for $\textbf{Skill}$s ($\textbf{MIND-Skill}$), a framework that automatically induces generalizable skills from successful trajectories with robust quality guarantees. MIND-Skill consists of an induction agent which is tasked to abstract reusable skills from successful trajectories, and a deduction agent which aims to reconstruct trajectories by following the induced skills. To guarantee the quality of the generated skills, we introduce a reconstruction loss that compares input and reconstructed trajectories, an outcome loss that enforces the correctness of the reconstructed trajectories, and a rubric loss that assesses the documentation quality and regularizes the abstraction level of the generated skills according to predefined criteria. These textual losses are jointly optimized with TextGrad, and the resulting skills are evaluated on held-out tasks unseen during optimization. Experiments on AppWorld and BFCL-v3 show that MIND-Skill consistently outperforms concurrent skill generation methods.2026-05-09T04:15:57ZYixuan LiMingshu CaiZiyang XiaoWanyuan WangYanchen DengBo Anhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2605.08669v1Modeling Decision-Making with Will for Cooperation in Social Dilemmas2026-05-09T04:13:55ZStandard rational actor models often attribute cooperation failures in social dilemmas to insufficient incentives, overlooking the destabilizing effects of continuous utility maximization. To address this, we propose a framework of ``will" defined as a mechanism that persistently pursues goals while ignoring local cost-benefit fluctuations. We formalize the Willed Agents as potential minimizers, distinguishing them from cumulative utility maximization. Dynamical analysis of infinite population demonstrates that willed agents shrink the feasible state space, acting as boundary constraints that accelerate convergence in canonical social dilemmas. Through multi-agent simulations in a spatiotemporal Stag Hunt Game, we show that willed agents function as ``cooperation catalysts", enabling groups to surmount high-risk thresholds where purely utility maximization fails. We find that heterogeneous will strength promotes cooperation, and that agents who autonomously suspend rational re-evaluation can significantly outperform continuous optimizers. These findings suggest that successful cooperation relies on the cognitive capacity to strategically constrain calculation.2026-05-09T04:13:55ZAccepted at CogSci 2026Yizhe HuangBin LingSong-Chun ZhuXue Fenghttp://arxiv.org/abs/2510.13896v2GenCellAgent: Generalizable, Training-Free Cellular Image Segmentation via Large Language Model Agents2026-05-09T02:53:15ZCellular image segmentation is essential for quantitative biology yet remains difficult due to heterogeneous modalities, morphological variability, and limited annotations. We present GenCellAgent, a training-free multi-agent framework that orchestrates specialist segmenters and generalist vision-language models via a planner-executor-evaluator loop (choose tool $\rightarrow$ run $\rightarrow$ quality-check) with long-term memory. The system (i) automatically routes images to the best tool, (ii) adapts on the fly using a few reference images when imaging conditions differ from what a tool expects, (iii) supports text-guided segmentation of organelles not covered by existing models, and (iv) commits expert edits to memory, enabling self-evolution and personalized workflows. Across seven cell-segmentation benchmarks spanning diverse microscopy modalities (4,718 images), this routing consistently matches or exceeds the best individual tool on every dataset and outperforms all baselines in overall accuracy. On out-of-distribution organelle data, GenCellAgent substantially outperforms specialist models that were not trained on the target domain, recovering structures that dedicated tools fail to detect. It also segments novel objects such as the Golgi apparatus via iterative text-guided refinement, with light human correction further boosting performance. Together, these capabilities provide a practical path to robust, adaptable cellular image segmentation without retraining, while reducing annotation burden and matching user preferences.2025-10-14T17:02:57Z43 pagesXi YuYang YangQun LiuYonghua DuSean McSweeneyYuewei Linhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2605.08626v1Large Language Models over Networks: Collaborative Intelligence under Resource Constraints2026-05-09T02:42:39ZLarge language models (LLMs) are transforming society, powering applications from smartphone assistants to autonomous driving. Yet cloud-based LLM services alone cannot serve a growing class of applications, including those operating under intermittent connectivity, sub-second latency budgets, data-residency constraints, or sustained high-volume inference. On-device deployment is in turn constrained by limited computation and memory. No single endpoint can deliver high-quality service across this spectrum. This article focuses on collaborative intelligence, a paradigm in which multiple independent LLMs distributed across device and cloud endpoints collaborate at the task level through natural language or structured messages. Such collaboration strives for superior response quality under heterogeneous resource constraints spanning computation, memory, communication, and cost across network tiers. We present collaborative inference along two complementary and composable dimensions: vertical device-cloud collaboration and horizontal multi-agent collaboration, which can be combined into hybrid topologies in practice. We then examine learning to collaborate, addressing the training of routing policies and the development of cooperative capabilities among LLMs. Finally, we identify open research challenges including scaling under resource heterogeneity and trustworthy collaborative intelligence.2026-05-09T02:42:39ZLiangqi YuanWenzhi FangShiqiang WangH. Vincent PoorChristopher G. Brintonhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2605.08613v1Generalization Bounds of Emergent Communications for Agentic AI Networking2026-05-09T02:15:34ZThe evolution of 6G networking toward agentic AI networking (AgentNet) systems requires a shift from traditional data pipelines to task-aware, agentic AI-native communication solutions. Emergent communication, a novel communication paradigm in which autonomous agents learn their own signaling protocols through interaction, is increasingly viewed as a promising solution to address the challenges posed by existing rigid, predefined protocol-based networking architecture. However, most existing emergent communication frameworks fail to account for physical networking constraints, such as bandwidth and computational complexity, and often lack a rigorous information-theoretical foundation. To address these challenges, this paper introduces a novel emergent communication framework that facilitates collaborative task-solving among heterogeneous agents through an information-theoretic lens. We propose a novel joint loss function that unifies the optimization of decision-making functions and the learning of communication signaling. Our proposed solution is grounded on the multi-agent and multi-task distributed information bottleneck (DIB) theory, which allows the quantification of the fundamental trade-off between task-relevant information representation and computational complexity. We further provide theoretical generalization bounds of the emergent communication protocol during decentralized inference across unseen environmental states. Experimental validation on a real-world hardware prototype confirms that our proposed framework significantly improves generalization performance, compared to the state-of-the-art solutions.2026-05-09T02:15:34ZAccepted at IEEE ISIT Workshop, Guangzhou, China, June 2026Yong XiaoJingxuan ChaiGuangming ShiPing Zhanghttp://arxiv.org/abs/2605.08580v1Slipstream: Trajectory-Grounded Compaction Validation for Long-Horizon Agents2026-05-09T00:47:43ZTo cope with the large contexts that long-horizon LLM agents produce, modern frameworks increasingly rely on compaction -- invoking an LLM to rewrite the accumulated trajectory into a shorter summary that the agent resumes from. Today, compaction runs synchronously on the critical path of agent execution but this can unpredictably degrade accuracy due to a structural validation gap: the compactor must condense context but is fundamentally unaware of precisely what information the agent will need later. Further, because post-compaction agent steps are conditioned on the new summary, targeted validation criteria do not exist and errors silently propagate through coherent but incorrect behavior. Our key insight is that asynchronous compaction efficiently addresses this gap: by running the compactor in parallel with continued agent execution on the original context, the candidate summary and the agent's next steps are generated independently from the same pre-compaction state, yielding a validation signal independent of the summary itself. We build Slipstream, a trajectory-grounded compaction system that uses a judge to validate the candidate summary against the agent's continued reasoning, checking that it preserves both the agent's forward intent and the key facts and constraints it depends on. Across long-horizon coding (SWE-bench Verified) and web-browsing (BrowseComp) workloads, Slipstream improves task accuracy by up to 8.8 percentage points while reducing end-to-end latency by up to 39.7%.2026-05-09T00:47:43Z9 pages (16 pages counting references, appendix), 6 figures, 2 tablesZhuofu ChenRui PanYinwei DaiRavi Netravalihttp://arxiv.org/abs/2605.08540v1Too Many Specialists: Emergent Inefficiencies and Bottlenecks for Multi-agent Ad-hoc Collaboration2026-05-08T22:59:11ZComputational models of collaboration without prior coordination often overlook how heterogeneous agent traits and complex task structures jointly produce systemic bottlenecks, inefficiencies, and contribution inequalities. We address this by using an agent-based model of ad-hoc teamwork in a kitchen environment. Our model integrates diverse agent personas with tasks that combine serial and parallel dependencies. We identify a specialist's dilemma, where rigid role assertion generates system-level bottlenecks, amplifies workload inequality, and fosters fragmented, homophilous networks. We also find that team size and communication overhead interact with problem structure to generate diminishing returns and redundant collaboration. Linking micro-level behavior to macro-level outcomes provides insights into emergent collaboration and design principles for effective multi-agent teamwork.2026-05-08T22:59:11ZPublished in Proceedings of Proc. of the 25th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS 2026)Benjamin PannyShashank MehrotraZahra ZahediTeruhisa MisuKumar Akashhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2605.08528v1SceneFactory: GPU-Accelerated Multi-Agent Driving Simulation with Physics-Based Vehicle Dynamics2026-05-08T22:23:11ZAutonomous-driving simulators typically trade physical fidelity for scalable parallelism. Physics-based platforms such as CARLA and MetaDrive provide articulated vehicle dynamics and contact, but their non-vectorized interfaces make batched training difficult. GPU-batched systems such as Waymax and GPUDrive scale to hundreds of scenarios by replacing rigid-body physics with simplified kinematic models, omitting tire--road interaction, suspension, contact dynamics, and road-condition-dependent friction. We introduce SceneFactory, a GPU-vectorized platform for procedural scene construction, physics-based multi-agent simulation, and RL in autonomous-driving environments. Built on NVIDIA Isaac Sim + Isaac Lab, SceneFactory represents worlds and agents as batched tensors: control, observations, rewards, resets, and policy inference run as GPU tensor operations over the Isaac Lab tensor API. SceneFactory converts Waymo Open Motion Dataset road topologies into simulation-ready USD worlds, runs many worlds concurrently on one GPU, populates each with multiple articulated PhysX vehicles, and maps precipitation and road-surface type to PhysX material friction coefficients. With GPU vectorization, SceneFactory achieves up to 127$\times$ higher throughput than a non-vectorized PhysX baseline on the same GPU and physics solver, reaching 19,250 controlled-agent simulation steps per second at 256 worlds $\times$ 16 agents. Cross-simulator transfer reveals an asymmetric dynamics gap: physics-grounded RL policies transfer to a simplified kinematic bicycle model with 99.5% success, whereas reverse transfer drops to 47.3%. Under wet-road friction, friction-aware policies reduce mean peak DRAC from 58.7 to 27.8,m/s$^2$ without sacrificing goal reach. SceneFactory shows that scalable autonomous-driving training need not discard articulated rigid-body dynamics or physically grounded road-condition variation.2026-05-08T22:23:11ZYicheng ZhuYang ChenTao LiZilin Bianhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2605.08060v1The Memory Curse: How Expanded Recall Erodes Cooperative Intent in LLM Agents2026-05-08T17:47:13ZContext window expansion is often treated as a straightforward capability upgrade for LLMs, but we find it systematically fails in multi-agent social dilemmas. Across 7 LLMs and 4 games over 500 rounds, expanding accessible history degrades cooperation in 18 of 28 model--game settings, a pattern we term the memory curse. We isolate the underlying mechanism through three analyses. First, lexical analysis of 378,000 reasoning traces associates this breakdown with eroding forward-looking intent rather than rising paranoia. We validate this using targeted fine-tuning as a cognitive probe: a LoRA adapter trained exclusively on forward-looking traces mitigates the decay and transfers zero-shot to distinct games. Second, memory sanitization holds prompt length fixed while replacing visible history with synthetic cooperative records, which restores cooperation substantially, proving the trigger is memory content, not length alone. Finally, ablating explicit Chain-of-Thought reasoning often reduces the collapse, showing that deliberation paradoxically amplifies the memory curse. Together, these results recast memory as an active determinant of multi-agent behavior: longer recall can either destabilize or support cooperation depending on the reasoning patterns it elicits.2026-05-08T17:47:13ZJiayuan LiuTianqin LiShiyi DuXin LuoHaoxuan ZengEmanuel TewoldeTai Sing LeeTonghan WangCarl KingsfordVincent Conitzerhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2605.07996v1Nash without Numbers: A Social Choice Approach to Mixed Equilibria in Context-Ordinal Games2026-05-08T16:51:42ZNash equilibrium serves as a fundamental mathematical tool in economics and game theory. However, it classically assumes knowledge of player utilities, whereas economics generally regards preferences as more fundamental. To leverage equilibrium analysis in strategic scenarios, one must first elicit numerical utilities consistent with player preferences, a delicate and time-consuming process. In this work, we forgo precise utilities and generalize the Nash equilibrium to a setting where we only assume a player is capable of providing an ordinal ranking of their actions within the context of other players' joint actions. The key technical challenge is to rethink the definition of a best-response. While the classical definition identifies actions maximizing expected payoff, we naturally look towards social choice theory for how to aggregate preferences to identify the most preferred actions. We define this generalized notion of a context-ordinal Nash equilibrium, establish its existence under mild conditions on aggregation methods, introduce notions of regularization, approximation, and regret, explore complexity for simple settings, and develop learning rules for computing such equilibria. In doing so, we provide a generalization of Nash equilibrium and demonstrate its direct applicability to elicited preferences in human experiments.2026-05-08T16:51:42ZIan GempCrystal QianMarc LanctotKate Larsonhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2605.08321v1LLM Wardens: Mitigating Adversarial Persuasion with Third-Party Conversational Oversight2026-05-08T16:23:47ZLLMs are increasingly capable of persuasion, which raises the question of how to protect users against manipulation. In a preregistered user study (N=120) across four decision-making scenarios, we find that an adversarial LLM with a hidden goal succeeds in steering users' decisions 65.4% of the time. We then introduce a "warden" model: a secondary LLM that monitors the human-AI interaction trace in real time and issues non-binding, private advisories to the user when it detects manipulation. Adding a warden more than halves the adversary's success rate to 30.4%, with a much smaller (8.6 percentage points) reduction for genuine interactions. To probe the mechanism behind these results, we release COAX-Bench, a simulation benchmark spanning 14 decision-making scenarios, including hiring, voting, and file access. Across 16,212 simulated multi-agent interactions, capable adversarial LLMs achieve their hidden goals in 34.7% of cases, which warden models reduce to 12.3%. Notably, even warden models substantially weaker than the adversary they oversee provide meaningful protection, suggesting a path for scalable oversight of more capable models.2026-05-08T16:23:47ZLennart WachowiakScott D. BlainDavid Williams-KingSamuele Marro