https://arxiv.org/api/uKo82nTqPPKimBqVPwILFOtus2w 2026-06-13T15:16:08Z 12619 75 15 http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.08402v1 2026-06-07T01:38:39Z

Generating complete 3D scenes from a single image requires inferring globally consistent geometry, object relationships, and environmental context from inherently ambiguous visual evidence. Despite recent progress in joint layout-and-mesh generation, existing methods often rely on holistic or weakly decomposed pipelines that entangle many factors at once and demand extensive scene-level supervision, limiting their generalization to complex real-world environments. We propose a multi-agent orchestration framework that decomposes single-image 3D scene generation into three structured stages: scene initialization, environment construction, and multi-agent refinement. The initialization stage extracts image-derived object masks, builds object-level 3D representations, and predicts an initial spatial layout to form a coarse 3D scene. The environment-construction stage then leverages this initialization together with point-map geometry to build an environmental scaffold of supporting surfaces, room boundaries, materials, and illumination. Finally, in the refinement stage, a planner agent identifies structural and visual inconsistencies, applies simple corrections directly, and dispatches specialist agents for complex localized revisions that are reintegrated into the global scene. To provide reliable structural initialization while reducing reliance on scene-level annotations, we further introduce a geometry-aware layout predictor supervised by sparse geometric priors derived from point maps. Unlike fully supervised layout generators, the predictor can be trained from segmentation-level data and generalizes robustly to diverse real-world scenes. Extensive experiments on benchmark datasets show that our method consistently outperforms prior approaches in geometric accuracy, spatial consistency, and perceptual realism.

2026-06-07T01:38:39Z Jeonghwan Kim Yushi Lan Yongwei Chen Hieu Trung Nguyen Chuanyu Pan Xingang Pan http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.09919v1 2026-06-07T00:02:21Z

Perceptual uncertainty is a central challenge for heterogeneous robot teams operating in unstructured outdoor environments, where no single viewpoint affords reliable scene understanding. Perceptual uncertainty, arising from sources such as occlusions, manifests differently across robot viewpoints depending on scene structure. Detecting and resolving sources of perceptual uncertainty requires both scene-based contextual reasoning and capability-aware robot allocation. While vision-language models provide strong semantic priors for both, they are computationally prohibitive for onboard inference and lack calibrated uncertainty quantification. We introduce Co-GLANCE, a real-time onboard perception and decision-making system for uncertainty resolution in heterogeneous robot teams. Co-GLANCE distills the semantic reasoning capabilities of a vision-language model into an end-to-end model for occlusion segmentation and robot allocation, eliminating the need for cloud-based inference. To quantify perceptual uncertainty, Co-GLANCE combines conformal prediction with selective abstention to provide statistically valid coverage guarantees for segmentation, robot allocation, and detection outputs. These calibrated uncertainty estimates directly trigger active perception, dispatching the most appropriate robot to acquire informative viewpoints and resolve uncertainty. Across real-world scenarios, Co-GLANCE outperforms cloud-based vision-language model baselines in occlusion segmentation and robot allocation accuracy by 25% and 36%, respectively, while reducing per-frame inference latency 350x. We also release an air-ground dataset for future research. Code, videos, and dataset available at https://co-glance.github.io/ .

2026-06-07T00:02:21Z Code, videos, and dataset available at https://co-glance.github.io/ Michal P. Podolinsky Neel P. Bhatt Pranay Samineni Rohan Siva Christian Ellis Ufuk Topcu http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.08367v1 2026-06-06T22:59:27Z

Most evaluations of LLM agents look like exams: a discrete task, a clean environment, a score in minutes or hours. We argue that this approach is mismatched with the deployment conditions of autonomous systems, where the relevant timescale can be weeks to months, and where the dynamics that matter most, such as behavioral drift, governance in diverse environmental contexts, and cross-influence between agents from different model families, only emerge over time. We introduce Emergence World, a continuously running multi-agent simulation platform designed to make those dynamics measurable. The platform hosts populations of LLM-driven agents in a shared spatial world grounded in live external data (e.g. real-time weather, news APIs, internet access), equips each agent with 120+ specialized tools and three persistent memory systems, and lets them govern themselves through democratic mechanisms with consequential outcomes. The platform is model-agnostic at the reasoning layer and supports heterogeneous populations in which agents from different vendors share the same world. To illustrate the kinds of questions the platform makes tractable, we present a 15-day cross-vendor study with five parallel worlds powered by Claude Sonnet 4.6, Grok 4.1 Fast, Gemini 3 Flash, GPT-5-mini, and a mixed population. Identical roles and starting conditions produced radically different outcomes, ranging from stable deliberative governance to total population collapse. We release the prompts, log data and configurations to support further research on long-horizon multi-agent autonomy.

2026-06-06T22:59:27Z Deepak Akkil Ravi Kokku Karthik Vikram Tamer Abuelsaad Aditya Vempaty Satya Nitta http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.08340v1 2026-06-06T21:13:43Z

As language models are increasingly deployed as autonomous agents, they must coordinate with others over long horizons in open-ended interactive tasks. Yet existing evaluations rarely test these demands together, instead emphasising single-agent tasks, short interactions, or highly structured multi-agent settings. We introduce $alem$, a JAX-based benchmark for open-ended multi-agent coordination built on Craftax-like dynamics. Alem embeds procedurally generated coordination tasks, soft specialisation, communication, and controllable coordination difficulty into a long-horizon survival world with exploration, crafting, trading, and combat. We evaluate $13$ modern LLMs zero-shot within homogeneous teams, with trained MARL agents as reference points. Current LLM agents remain far from solving alem, averaging only ~6% normalised return, but their failures are not uniform. On the hardest coordination setting, zero-shot Gemini-3.1-Pro-High approaches MARL agents trained for one billion steps, while GPT-5.4-High achieves strong base-task reward but much lower coordination reward. This contrast shows that individual task competence does not imply coordination competence. Ablations show that communication is the largest contributor to coordination, while memory and reasoning help when used to maintain multi-step plans. Overall, our results identify coordination as a distinct bottleneck for frontier LLM agents, separate from single-agent capabilities. Alem makes this bottleneck measurable and provides a controlled testbed for developing agents that communicate, allocate roles, and execute shared plans. Code is available at https://github.com/alem-world/alem-env.

2026-06-06T21:13:43Z 42 pages, preprint Kale-ab Abebe Tessera Andras Szecsenyi Cameron Barker Alexander Rutherford Davide Paglieri Aidan Scannell Henry Gouk Elliot J. Crowley Tim Rocktäschel Amos Storkey http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.08310v1 2026-06-06T19:43:53Z

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed as long-horizon agents with decision-making capacities. While LLMs can show ethical competence on dilemmas such as trolley problems, this competence may not translate to complex, agentic scenarios. We study this gap in Civilization V, a multiplayer game with a complex decision-making landscape including economy, diplomacy, technology, and military strategy. Starting from 130 high-tension LLM self-play episodes, in which an LLM player spontaneously escalated nuclear authorization, we replay them across 13 models with three prompt interventions: an ethical prompt naming nuclear harm, removal of the previous model's decision-making rationale, and high-stakes framing emphasizing real-world impacts. No interventions nor their combinations reliably eliminate emergent escalation. We identify three failure pathways: ethical reasoning that fails to surface without prompting, fails to appear even when prompted, or surfaces but fails to take effect when strategic counter-factors dominate. Evaluations of agentic models, therefore, must test whether ethical reasoning is spontaneously invoked and behaviorally effective in complex decision-making contexts, beyond whether it can be elicited in isolation.

2026-06-06T19:43:53Z John Chen Sihan Cheng Can Gurkan H M Abdul Fattah http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.08274v1 2026-06-06T17:40:21Z

The emergence of large language model (LLM)-based agents and multi-agent systems has enabled a shift from narrow task automation to more autonomous decision-making. Despite progress in language generation, planning, tool use, and coordination, most agents still treat intelligence as prediction, optimization, and task completion. Human environments are social and normative, where people reason under bounded rationality, communicate in culturally situated language, and make decisions guided by values, beliefs, trust, and social norms. This survey argues that future AI agents, especially those acting on behalf of humans, must move beyond task competence toward human-centered capabilities. We review research across six areas: (1) evolution of intelligent agents, (2) human cognition and decision-making, (3) language, culture, and social context, (4) human values and belief systems, (5) human-agent collaboration, and (6) multi-agent coordination and modeling of human characteristics. We synthesize work from cognitive science, sociolinguistics, computational social science, and AI alignment, along with recent advances in LLM agents, cultural alignment benchmarks, preference learning, explainability, and agent societies. We identify a key gap: existing systems do not provide a unified framework integrating cognition, culture, values, and social behavior into autonomous agents. We conclude with directions for building culturally aware, value-aligned, cognitively grounded, and cooperative multi-agent systems.

2026-06-06T17:40:21Z 14 pages Safia Baloch Rahemeen Khan http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.19082v2 2026-06-06T14:41:12Z

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed as autonomous agents that negotiate, coordinate, and act on behalf of users. Whether they cooperate in such settings is no longer just an academic question, but a central issue for AI governance. We approach it from a strategic-behaviour angle, asking how two everyday levers - the size of what is at stake, and the language in which the interaction is described - shape the strategies LLMs adopt in a repeated Prisoner's Dilemma. Rather than reading cooperation off raw action counts, we train supervised classifiers to recognise the canonical strategies of repeated games (always cooperate, always defect, Tit-for-Tat, Win-Stay-Lose-Shift) and use them as a lens onto LLM behaviour. To know what the strategy distribution should look like under the same payoffs, we derive an evolutionary game theory (EGT) baseline and compare it with the LLM data. The two outcomes disagree in a revealing way: as stakes grow, evolutionary theory predicts that defection should take over the population, yet LLMs move in the opposite direction, becoming more cooperative - a signature, we argue, of alignment training and the human-like reasoning patterns LLMs inherit from their training data. We further show that this picture is not particular to frontier-scale, proprietary models: it also occurs with three open-weight smaller LLMs. Overall, our analysis highlights that payoff design and linguistic framing are powerful but under-explored levers for steering LLM behaviour, with direct implications for evaluating, aligning, and governing multi-agent AI systems deployed in high-stakes, multilingual environments.

2026-01-27T01:36:50Z 44 pages, 17 figures, 4 tables Trung-Kiet Huynh Dao-Sy Duy-Minh Thanh-Bang Cao Phong-Hao Le Hong-Dan Nguyen Phu-Quy Nguyen-Lam Minh-Luan Nguyen-Vo Hong-Phat Pham Phu-Hoa Pham Thien-Kim Than Chi-Nguyen Tran Huy Tran Gia-Thoai Tran-Le Alessio Buscemi Le Hong Trang The Anh Han http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.08162v1 2026-06-06T13:22:07Z

Large Language Model (LLM) agent systems suffer from failures that occur without external triggers -- no injection, no adversarial input, no resource exhaustion. These silent failures -- unexpected deviations from intended behavior under normal conditions -- are routinely misattributed to bugs or configuration errors. Through systematic analysis of over 40,000 controlled trials and long-term production observations spanning 100,000+ agent interactions, we identify a common structural logic underlying these failures. Building on patterns observed in our experiments, we survey the global research literature on autonomous agent reliability and synthesize 22 intrinsic properties of LLM agent systems across six lifecycle layers: foundation semantics, inter-agent transmission, memory persistence, task execution, feedback correction, and systemic evolution. We demonstrate that whenever a sufficient subset of these properties co-exist, system entropy -- the measurable accumulation of disorder: loss of output consistency, task accuracy, and cross-session coherence -- increases monotonically with interaction rounds. We formalize this as the Entropy Principle: S(t) = S0 * e^(alpha * t), with alpha measured empirically across multiple architectures. We propose the PIG (Physical Integrity Gate) Engine with the ADE (Agent Delivery Engineering) protocol suite as an engineering countermeasure to entropy-driven disorder. Our findings establish silent failure not as a bug to be fixed but as a manifestation of Intelligence Entropy -- a physical constraint to be managed through deterministic governance. We argue that any engineering effort stabilizing the structure and order of agent systems participates in a unified mission: keeping intelligent systems reliable as they grow in scale and complexity.

2026-06-06T13:22:07Z 10 pages, 7 figures Dexing Liu http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.07779v2 2026-06-06T13:17:33Z

We study decentralized online Riemannian optimization over manifolds with possibly positive curvature, going beyond the Hadamard manifold setting. Decentralized optimization techniques rely on a consensus step that is well understood in Euclidean spaces because of their linearity. However, in positively curved Riemannian spaces, a main technical challenge is that geodesic distances may not induce a globally convex structure. In this work, we first analyze a curvature-aware Riemannian consensus step that enables a linear convergence beyond Hadamard manifolds. Building on this step, we establish a $O(\sqrt{T})$ regret bound for the decentralized online Riemannian gradient descent algorithm. Then, we investigate the two-point bandit feedback setup, where we employ computationally efficient gradient estimators using smoothing techniques, and we demonstrate the same $O(\sqrt{T})$ regret bound through the subconvexity analysis of smoothed objectives.

2025-09-09T14:14:46Z Emre Sahinoglu Shahin Shahrampour http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.08106v1 2026-06-06T11:12:11Z

Self-evolving agents improve by repeatedly proposing changes to their own prompts, skills, or workflows and keeping those that score higher on a small held-out set. Almost all effort has gone into the proposer that generates candidates; we argue the weak point is the acceptor, the rule that decides whether to commit a change. Applied hundreds of times against the same noisy dev estimate, the ubiquitous "keep it if the score went up" rule is uncontrolled adaptive multiple testing: the agent effectively p-hacks itself, accumulating false commits that make it churn and drift rather than improve. We recast committing as a sequential hypothesis test and propose PACE (Paired Anytime-valid Commit Evaluation), a training-free, anytime-valid commit gate. Each candidate is compared to the incumbent on identical instances and committed only when a testing-by-betting e-process accumulates decisive evidence, stopping early to save evaluations and controlling each candidate's false-commit probability at a user-set level even under optional stopping (a per-decision guarantee). On Qwen2.5 agents (0.5B-3B) self-evolving at the prompt level on GSM8K, SVAMP, and ARC-Challenge, greedy acceptance commits 30-42% false and 10-33% harmful edits when a genuine improvement is hidden among noisy proposals, while PACE commits the real one and essentially nothing else, matching greedy's held-out accuracy at sharply lower variance and about 18% lower evaluation cost. With no real gain available, greedy commits 13-21 spurious self-modifications per run (72-100% false) and degrades the most fragile agent by 4.9 points, while PACE holds at baseline. Reliability of self-evolution depends on the acceptor, not only on the proposer.

2026-06-06T11:12:11Z Zayx Shawn http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.05026v2 2026-06-06T10:01:06Z

Language model (LM) agents have driven substantial progress in automated software engineering (SWE), yet building and testing software repositories at scale remains a largely manual and labor-intensive bottleneck. In this work, we introduce RepoLaunch, a novel agentic framework that automatically resolves dependencies, compiles source code, and extracts test results across diverse programming languages and operating systems. RepoLaunch achieves a 78% build success rate, outperforming the Python/Linux-only prior system by 18%. To demonstrate its application, we further present a fully automated pipeline for SWE dataset creation driven by RepoLaunch, which only requires human input at the task-design stage. RepoLaunch is open-sourced, and its automated task-generation pipeline has already been adopted by several recent works on agentic benchmarking and training.

2026-03-05T10:15:13Z Under peer review. 22 pages, 5 figures, 9 tables Kenan Li Rongzhi Li Linghao Zhang Qirui Jin Liao Zhu Xiaosong Huang Geng Zhang Yikai Zhang Shilin He Chengxing Xie Xin Zhang Zijian Jin Bowen Li Chaoyun Zhang Yu Kang Yufan Huang Elsie Nallipogu Saravan Rajmohan Qingwei Lin Dongmei Zhang http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.08049v1 2026-06-06T08:27:18Z

AI agents increasingly turn past experience into reusable artifacts such as code, workflows, and procedural memories. Reuse can improve efficiency, but it also creates a lifecycle reliability problem: artifacts that succeed once may fail under environment drift, underspecified tasks, or changing task distributions, especially in web automation. We introduce SKILL.nb, a framework for governing reusable agent workflows with evidence-calibrated lifecycle policies. SKILL.nb uses selective formalization: execution evidence decides which workflow steps should become executable code, which should remain natural-language guided, and when those choices should be revised. Workflows are stored as auditable, versioned notebooks that interleave natural-language guidance, multi-language executable cells, validation gates, fallback paths, and multimodal evidence such as outputs, screenshots, and error traces. At runtime, gate-conditioned execution lets each step run code when its gates validate, or fall back locally when drift invalidates the executable realization. On WebArena-Verified, SKILL.nb achieves 53.7% single-round success, improving over the strongest baseline by 3.9 percentage points. Across three re-executions, it retains 91.7% of initially successful tasks, 15.5 points above the next best method. Under bounded repair, it recovers 72.9% of subsequent failures while limiting post-repair regressions to 4.2%, compared with 15.0% to 17.0% for persistent baselines. It also leads on Mind2Web cross-website and cross-domain splits. In a GitLab migration test, SKILL.nb preserves performance when reusing frozen state learned on GitLab 15.7, with frozen-versus-fresh target-version gaps of -1.7 points on GitLab 16.11 and +0.6 points on GitLab 18.9. These results identify lifecycle governance and gate-conditioned execution as reliability axes beyond one-shot task success.

2026-06-06T08:27:18Z Amine El Hattami Nicolas Chapados Christopher Pal http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.08030v1 2026-06-06T07:46:08Z

Agentic tutoring systems introduce a coordination challenge: multiple agents may propose different but reasonable interventions, yet only one response can be delivered to the learner. In this paper, we study how voting protocols shape cooperation among four role-constrained pedagogical agents responsible for scaffolding, misconception, motivation, and metacognition. We compare four voting protocols -- simple, ranked, cumulative, and approval voting -- across two simulated tutoring environments on SciQ and HumanEval benchmarks. Rather than using voting as a simple aggregation step, we use it to analyze how collective decision rules shape coordination under partial pedagogical conflict. Across 1,200 simulated interactions, we find that agent deliberation and voting protocol type frequently change which response ultimately wins, showing that both meaningfully shape the collective decision. Different voting rules also produce distinct coordination behaviors, and even brief tutoring turns show measurable learning gains in simulated students. Overall, we show that protocol choice is associated with distinct coordination patterns among role-specialized pedagogical agents.

2026-06-06T07:46:08Z Accepted to ICML 2026 Workshop on AI4Good Eric S. Qiu Joyce Gill http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.08021v1 2026-06-06T07:31:04Z

As large language model (LLM) agents are integrated into autonomous cloud operations, distributed systems face a semantic reliability problem: proposer agents can generate production mutations, such as modifying IAM policies, opening firewall security groups, or executing data exports, that are syntactically valid and statically authorized but operationally unsafe. Classical distributed consensus protocols replicate deterministic state transitions but do not evaluate the safety of the proposed intent. To address this gap, we introduce Semantic Quorum Assurance (SQA), a control-plane primitive for governing non-deterministic agentic infrastructure. SQA represents proposals as declarative execution contracts bound to cryptographic evidence chains and routes them to a diverse panel of read-only, sandboxed validator agents. SQA aggregates their judgments under a risk-adaptive quorum predicate that enforces model and archetype diversity, adjusts weights based on calibrated assurance scores, and respects archetype-specific vetoes. Admitted proposals execute only through a sovereign execution gate. We instantiate SQA in a cloud-native control plane and formalize a correlated cognitive failure model for non-deterministic validators. On 500 infrastructure-inspired mutation scenarios, with safety results reported on held-out safe/unsafe trials excluding ambiguous scenarios, SQA reduces unsafe approval from 18.5% for single-agent validation to 0.3% while adding median validation latency of 1.45--4.12 seconds across the studied risk buckets.

2026-06-06T07:31:04Z 21 pages, 2 figures, 6 tables Jun He Deying Yu http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.04896v3 2026-06-06T04:42:57Z

We report the discovery of channel fracture, a silent architectural failure in multi-agent systems where information routed across agent boundaries is silently blocked by invisible constraints. We present three instances in a production Hermes Agent deployment: (1) cron memory injection blocked by scheduler barriers; (2) cross-profile skill routing fractured by recursive directory traversal; (3) WebSocket delivery confirmation fallback fracture causing message duplication. We propose CADVP v1.1, a 13-dimension verification protocol with a veto-level confirmation check. Through 30,012 trials, zero failure rates under protocol versus 69 to 98 percent without. Real-world validation (10,008 trials) confirms quality elevation from 0.90 to 1.00. Three design principles: inverse verification, channel matching, and PIP protection.

2026-06-03T13:55:29Z 39 pages, 6 figures, v3-pre expanded to three instances of cross-boundary channel fractures: cron memory injection (40,020 total trials), code-level rglob skill nesting, and WebSocket ACK delivery confirmation fallback fracture (DCFF). Includes PIP principal interest protection principles Dexing Liu