https://arxiv.org/api/vTOohGeUFhQ7mRTXFIjwWLYpBuE 2026-06-18T16:31:42Z 12677 375 15 http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.03534v5 2026-05-27T16:40:43Z

We study the problem of long-term (multiple days) mapping of a river plume using multiple autonomous underwater vehicles (AUVs), focusing on the Douro river representative use-case. We propose an energy - and communication - efficient multi-agent reinforcement learning approach in which a central coordinator intermittently communicates with the AUVs, collecting measurements and issuing commands. Our approach integrates spatiotemporal Gaussian process regression (GPR) with a multi-head Q-network controller that regulates direction and speed for each AUV. Simulations using the Delft3D ocean model demonstrate that our method consistently outperforms both single- and multi-agent benchmarks, with scaling the number of agents both improving mean squared error (MSE) and operational endurance. In some instances, our algorithm demonstrates that doubling the number of AUVs can more than double endurance while maintaining or improving accuracy, underscoring the benefits of multi-agent coordination. Our learned policies generalize across unseen seasonal regimes over different months and years, demonstrating promise for future developments of data-driven long-term monitoring of dynamic plume environments.

2025-10-03T22:08:08Z Accepted at the 2026 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation Nicolò Dal Fabbro Milad Mesbahi Renato Mendes João Borges de Sousa George J. Pappas http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.03430v2 2026-05-27T15:58:08Z

As Large Language Model (LLM) based Multi-Agent Systems (MAS) evolve from experimental pilots to complex, persistent ecosystems, the limitations of direct agent-to-agent communication have become increasingly apparent. Current architectures suffer from fragmented context, stochastic hallucinations, rigid security boundaries, and inefficient topology management. This paper introduces Cognitive Fabric Nodes (CFN), a novel middleware layer that creates an omnipresent "Cognitive Fabric" between agents. Unlike traditional message queues or service meshes, CFNs are not merely pass-through mechanisms; they are active, intelligent intermediaries. Central to this architecture is the elevation of Memory from simple storage to an active functional substrate that informs four other critical capabilities: Topology Selection, Semantic Grounding, Security Policy Enforcement, and Prompt Transformation. We propose that each of these functions be governed by learning modules utilizing Reinforcement Learning (RL) and optimization algorithms to improve system performance dynamically. By intercepting, analyzing, and rewriting inter-agent communication, the Cognitive Fabric ensures that individual agents remain lightweight while the ecosystem achieves coherence, safety, and semantic alignment. We evaluate the effectiveness of the CFN on the HotPotQA and MuSiQue datasets in a multi-agent environment and demonstrate that the CFN improves performance by more than 10\% on both datasets over direct agent to agent communication.

2026-04-03T19:58:01Z Charles Fleming Guillaume De Saint Marc Ramana Kompella Peter Bosch Vijoy Pandey http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.10185v3 2026-05-27T14:30:07Z

Large language models are increasingly being assembled into medical multi-agent systems that emulate multidisciplinary consultation through specialist roles, peer review and consensus formation. In clinical decision support, however, apparent consensus is not enough. Clinicians also need to know whether agents checked the evidence, addressed disagreement and kept uncertainty visible. Current evaluations largely score final accuracy, leaving the safety of the collaborative process untested. Here we introduce MedAgentAudit, a clinically grounded workflow audit framework for diagnosing and quantifying collaborative failure modes in medical multi-agent systems. From 3,600 execution logs, we derive an expert-validated taxonomy of ten recurrent failures spanning task comprehension, collaborative discussion, and synthesis and decision-making. We then deploy an expert-validated automated auditor as non-interventional probes across 14,400 cases, covering six multi-agent architectures, six medical text and vision datasets, and four large language model settings per modality. Across systems, collaboration yields uneven accuracy gains and frequent process failures. Unsupported observations affect 16.63% of cases and propagate downstream. In discussion, agents repeat initial views in 98.42% of cases rather than re-examining evidence, and fail to activate specialist reasoning in 42.73%. During synthesis, final answers often substitute authority or majority count for evidence checking, showing authority bias in 28.76% (rising from 35.30% to 68.75% across rounds), self-contradiction in 18.53%, contradiction neglect in 5.48% and minority suppression in 5.11%. MedAgentAudit reframes medical AI evaluation from output scoring to process-level safety and accountability, providing a practical foundation for transparent, auditable and clinician-supervised agentic systems in medicine.

2025-10-11T11:48:57Z Code and Data: https://github.com/MedX-PKU/MedAgentAudit Yinghao Zhu Lei Gu Zixiang Wang Haoran Sang Dehao Sui Wen Tang Lan Mi Yasha Wang Junyi Gao Liang Yao Tianfan Fu Ewen Harrison Lequan Yu Liantao Ma http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.28897v1 2026-05-27T12:40:35Z

LLM-generated reviews for scientific papers are gaining considerable traction and are even being officially piloted by major conferences. We have to assume that not only reviewers are using LLM-assistance, but also that authors use LLMs to revise their papers before submitting. In this work, we perform empirical experiments on papers from the 2025 ACL Rolling Review (ARR) to evaluate LLM reviews from both the author and the reviewer perspective. First, we identify a limited alignment of LLM reviews with human ones. In the best-case scenario, the alignment is reasonable. However, we also find that LLM-human alignment varies substantially across prompts and models. Finally, we investigate the scenario in which the author uses an iterative draft-revise workflow to improve the submission according to the LLM review. We find that this "gaming" of LLM reviews can be effective in specific scenarios, leading to a statistically significant increase of overall scores for up to 35\% of papers. We publish our code: https://github.com/uhh-hcds/reviewarcade.

2026-05-27T12:40:35Z Under Review EMNLP 26 Hans Ole Hatzel Sebastian Steindl Jan Strich http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.19743v2 2026-05-27T12:23:43Z

Large Language Model (LLM) agents are increasingly applied to engineering design tasks, yet existing evaluation frameworks do not adequately address multi-agent systems that combine simulation, retrieval, and manufacturing preparation. We introduce a benchmark suite with three evaluation dimensions: (1) a workflow benchmark with seven prompt styles targeting distinct cognitive demands-including direct tool use, semantic disambiguation, conditional branching, and working-memory tasks; (2) a Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) benchmark with gated scoring isolating retrieval contributions to parameter selection; and (3) an High Performance Computing (HPC) benchmark evaluating end-to-end ML training orchestration on a SLURM cluster. Alongside the benchmark we present EngiAI, a Multi-Agent System (MAS) reference implementation built on LangGraph that operationalizes the benchmark by coordinating seven specialized agents through a supervisor architecture, unifying topology optimization, document retrieval, HPC job orchestration, and 3D printer control. Across four LLM backends and two EngiBench problems, proprietary models achieve 96-97% average task completion on Beams2D, while open-source 4B-parameter models reach 55-78%, with clear generational improvement. Conditional branching proves most challenging, with task completion dropping to 20-53% for the conditional style on Photonics2D. RAG gating confirms near-perfect retrieval-augmented scores (about 1.0) versus near-zero without retrieval, validating the evaluation design. On HPC orchestration, one model completes all pipeline steps in 100% of runs while another drops to 50%, revealing that multi-step instruction following degrades over long-running workflows.

2026-05-19T12:12:09Z 26 pages, 10 figures, to be published at IDETC 2026 Gioele Molinari Florian Felten Soheyl Massoudi Mark Fuge http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.24413v3 2026-05-27T10:45:17Z

Deliberative democracy arguably leads to better collective decisions, but is fundamentally constrained by human attention and bandwidth. While recent AI-mediated deliberations scale participation by synthesizing inputs from many humans, they remain time-intensive for individual users. As AI models become increasingly capable, AI systems are being deployed not only to mediate deliberation between humans, but to represent humans in it: where AI agents deliberate on behalf of human users. We call this paradigm AI-delegated deliberation. While it promises unprecedented scale for democratic participation, it introduces qualitatively new design and alignment challenges that are poorly understood and under-theorized. To study these dynamics empirically, we deploy Habermolt, a public platform for AI-delegated deliberation. We evaluate its effectiveness along three dimensions that we use to organize any deliberative system: representation, aggregation, and revision. We use these observations to illuminate the design decisions future AI-delegated deliberation platforms must confront, contributing to the broader research agenda for scalable yet trustworthy AI representatives.

2026-05-23T05:50:50Z Joseph Low Oscar Duys Claude Formanek Michiel Bakker Lewis Hammond http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.28215v1 2026-05-27T09:32:34Z

In-context learning (ICL) enables multimodal large language models (MLLMs) to classify images from a few labelled examples. Yet, how these models use the provided context remains opaque. While Chain-of-Thought prompting is widely used, recent work argues that it may not reflect true internal computation. In this paper, we systematically evaluate the concept-based explainability of frozen MLLMs under few-shot ICL using five conditions of increasing formal rigour, ranging from baseline classification to Description Logics (DL) axiom generation. Evaluating four state-of-the-art MLLMs via an independent LLM-as-a-judge pipeline, we demonstrate that explaining is genuinely harder than predicting alone. Surprisingly, forcing models to generate formally structured, concept-based explanations degrades predictive accuracy monotonically (from 93.8% to 90.1%), contradicting the assumption that explicit reasoning universally aids performance. However, when models successfully articulate class-discriminative visual features, explanation quality strongly correlates with correct predictions. Our findings suggest that while MLLMs excel at visual classification, they lack the specific instruction-tuning required for formal, machine-verifiable explainability.

2026-05-27T09:32:34Z Accepted to the CompLearn Workshop at ICML 2026 Carmen Quiles-Ramírez Leticia L. Rodríguez Nicolás Martorell Natalia Díaz-Rodríguez http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.28214v1 2026-05-27T09:32:22Z

Latent-based multi-agent systems replace parts of explicit inter-agent communication with hidden representations, offering a new direction for efficient and flexible agent collaboration. However, moving coordination into latent space may also move attacks beyond the reach of visible-text inspection. In this paper, we study whether latent states can carry attack-associated information that remains effective during clean executions. To examine this question, we introduce a latent attack framework that reactivates attack-induced effects through latent interventions without reusing adversarial text. Extensive experiments show that the resulting latent-only attacks can substantially degrade task performance in clean executions, especially when applied to inter-agent KV-cache handoffs rather than local hidden states. Further control analyses indicate that this degradation cannot be reduced to arbitrary perturbations or invalid generation. Overall, our findings suggest that latent-based collaboration does not remove attack risk. It shifts part of the risk into less observable execution states, calling for safeguards beyond visible-text inspection.

2026-05-27T09:32:22Z 27 pages, 7 figures, 3 tables. Preprint Chenxi Wang Ruiyang Huang Jiayan Sun Lei Wei Yifan Wu http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.28120v1 2026-05-27T08:13:11Z

Graph-based Retrieval-Augmented Generation (GraphRAG) advances flat document retrieval by structuring knowledge as relational graphs, enabling more coherent and effective reasoning. However, applying it to specific domains like legal reasoning faces critical challenges. (i) Legal corpora are heterogeneous, containing multi-granular knowledge from cases, articles and interpretations. A flat knowledge graph cannot adequately differentiate between factual details, applied rules, and abstract principles, limiting accurate retrieval. (ii) Reliable legal judgment demands transparent, evidence-based reasoning. Traditional RAG passes retrieved context directly to an LLM without verification, resulting in opaque, error-prone reasoning. To this end, we propose LegalGraphRAG, a framework designed for reliable legal reasoning. Our approach introduces two core components: a hierarchical legal graph that hierarchically organizes legal sources to enable retrieval at appropriate abstraction levels, and a multi-agent system for reliable legal reasoning, where a Researcher retrieves candidate evidence, an Auditor rigorously verifies its validity against source documents, and an Adjudicator synthesizes the set of verified evidence to render a final judgment. Extensive experiments show that LegalGraphRAG achieves the state-of-the-art performance, outperforming existing GraphRAG baselines in accurate and trustworthy legal analysis. Our code, datasets and implementation details are available at https://github.com/XMUDeepLIT/LegalGraphRAG.

2026-05-27T08:13:11Z 30 pages, 18 figures, ACL 2026 Main Conference. Project page: https://github.com/XMUDeepLIT/LegalGraphRAG Zerui Chen Qinggang Zhang Zhishang Xiang Zhimin Wei Linfeng Gao Xiao Huang Zhihong Zhang Jinsong Su http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.12015v2 2026-05-27T06:26:15Z

Reusable skills are becoming a common interface for extending large language model agents, packaging procedural guidance with access to files, tools, memory, and execution environments. However, this modularity introduces attack surfaces that are largely missed by existing safety evaluations: even when the user request is benign, unsafe influence may reside in skill guidance, local artifacts, or execution-environment files that steer the agent toward unsafe actions. We present SkillSafetyBench, a runnable benchmark for evaluating such skill-mediated safety failures. SkillSafetyBench includes 155 adversarial cases across 47 tasks, 6 risk domains, and 30 safety categories, each evaluated with a case-specific rule-based verifier. Experiments with multiple CLI agents and model backends show that non-user attacks can consistently induce unsafe behavior, with distinct failure patterns across domains, attack methods, and scaffold-model pairings. Our findings suggest that agent safety depends not only on model-level alignment, but also on how agents interpret skills, trust workflow context, and act through executable environments.

2026-05-12T12:03:54Z Chang Jin An Wang Zeming Wei Kai Wang Biaojie Zeng Qiaosheng Zhang Chao Yang Jingjing Qu Xia Hu Xingcheng Xu http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.01829v4 2026-05-27T06:19:40Z

Large Language Models (LLMs) demonstrate persuasive capabilities that rival human-level persuasion. While these capabilities can be used for social good, they also present risks of potential misuse. Beyond the concern of how LLMs persuade others, their own susceptibility to persuasion poses a critical alignment challenge, raising questions about robustness, safety, and adherence to ethical principles. To study these dynamics, we introduce Persuade Me If You Can (PMIYC), an automated framework for evaluating persuasiveness and susceptibility to persuasion in multi-agent interactions. Our framework offers a scalable alternative to the costly and time-intensive human annotation process typically used to study persuasion in LLMs. PMIYC automatically conducts multi-turn conversations between Persuader and Persuadee agents, measuring both the effectiveness of and susceptibility to persuasion. Our comprehensive evaluation spans a diverse set of LLMs and persuasion settings (e.g., subjective and misinformation scenarios). We validate the efficacy of our framework through human evaluations and demonstrate alignment with human assessments from prior studies. Through PMIYC, we find that Llama-3.3-70B and GPT-4o exhibit similar persuasive effectiveness, outperforming Claude 3 Haiku by 30%. However, GPT-4o demonstrates over 50% greater resistance to persuasion for misinformation compared to Llama-3.3-70B. Notably, o4-mini emerges as both an effective persuader, and a resistant persuadee. These findings provide empirical insights into the persuasive dynamics of LLMs and contribute to the development of safer AI systems.

2025-03-03T18:53:21Z Paper published at the ACM Conference on AI and Agentic Systems 2026 Nimet Beyza Bozdag Shuhaib Mehri Gokhan Tur Dilek Hakkani-Tür 10.1145/3786335.3813181 http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.01665v4 2026-05-27T04:20:45Z

The design of environments plays a critical role in shaping the development and evaluation of cooperative multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) algorithms. While existing benchmarks highlight critical challenges, they often lack the modularity required to design custom evaluation scenarios. We introduce the Totally Accelerated Battle Simulator in JAX (TABX), a high-throughput sandbox designed for reconfigurable multi-agent tasks. TABX provides granular control over environmental parameters, permitting a systematic investigation into emergent agent behaviors and algorithmic trade-offs across a diverse spectrum of task complexities. Leveraging JAX for hardware-accelerated execution on GPUs, TABX enables massive parallelization and significantly reduces computational overhead. By providing a fast, extensible, and easily customized framework, TABX facilitates the study of MARL agents in complex structured domains and serves as a scalable foundation for future research. Our code is available at: https://github.com/ku-dmlab/TABX.

2026-02-02T05:34:38Z Hayeong Lee JunHyeok Oh Byung-Jun Lee http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.00309v2 2026-05-27T02:58:47Z

The increasingly popular agentic AI paradigm promises to harness the power of multiple, general-purpose large language model (LLM) agents to collaboratively complete complex tasks. While many agentic AI systems reduce complexity through predefined workflows or fixed agent roles, the ideal is to support truly autonomous agents capable of emergent collaboration across many interacting agents. Yet in practice, such unstructured interactions often lead to redundant work and cascading failures that are difficult to interpret or correct. In this work, we study multi-agent systems composed of general-purpose LLM agents that solve problems through emergent collaboration, without relying on predefined roles, control flows, or communication constraints. We introduce the Dynamic Interaction Graph (DIG), which captures emergent collaboration as a time-evolving causal network of agent activations and interactions. DIG makes emergent collaboration observable and explainable for the first time, enabling real-time identification, explanation, and correction of collaboration-induced error patterns directly from agents' collaboration paths. Thus, DIG fills a critical gap in understanding how general LLM agents solve problems together in truly agentic multi-agent systems. The project webpage can be found at: https://happyeureka.github.io/dig.

2026-02-27T20:59:37Z Hanqing Yang Hyungwoo Lee Yuhang Yao Zhiwei Liu Kay Liu Jingdi Chen Carlee Joe-Wong http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.25815v3 2026-05-27T02:37:25Z

Agent-to-Agent (A2A) networks enable autonomous AI agents to collaborate by sharing reusable problem-solving instructions. However, how these decentralized ecosystems operate in practice remains largely unexplored. We present the first large-scale empirical study of EvoMap, a prominent A2A collaboration network. By analyzing over 1.5M assets and 128K agents, we show how design choices that prioritize scalable growth introduce trade-offs in reusability, evolution, and auditability. First, EvoMap's credit economy rewards agents for publishing valuable assets. Although this design encourages participation at scale, rewards are tied primarily to publication rather than adoption. This leads agents to mass-produce assets to accumulate credits. As a result, 98% of assets are never reused, while rewards become highly concentrated among a small fraction of agents. Second, EvoMap employs an algorithm (referred to as GDI) to score and rank the quality of these shared assets. We demonstrate that this scoring system is flawed: rather than measuring objective performance, an asset's rank is heavily dictated by unverified, self-reported metadata (e.g., claimed lines of code modified). This allows agents to trivially manipulate their asset's scores. Finally, EvoMap relies on agents to provide local execution logs as evidence that uploaded assets function correctly. Because these validations are not independently verified, over 84% of approved assets bypass quality checks using vacuous tests (e.g., console$.$log()). Our findings show that future A2A collaboration networks cannot rely on unverified self-reporting alone. Scalable collaboration requires mechanisms that balance open participation with verifiable execution and trustworthy evaluation.

2026-05-25T13:12:27Z Qiming Ye Peixain Zhang Yupeng He Zifan Peng Gareth Tyson http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.00349v2 2026-05-27T02:28:21Z

Many complex tasks require extended effort, diverse capabilities, or coordinated actions beyond what a single agent can provide. However, simply adding more agents does not guarantee better performance, as effective cooperation depends on how agents interact with each other and with task structure to satisfy evolving constraints over time. This challenge is amplified for LLM-based multi-agent systems (LLM-MAS): plans, messages, and revisions occur in natural language, whereas task progress depends on grounded environment actions. Current evaluations mostly treat cooperation as an implicit ingredient of final task success, leaving both cooperation and the effect of multi-agent interaction on task dynamics difficult to study. We introduce COOP$^2$, an evaluation framework that grounds high-level agent cooperation dynamics in LLM-MAS within task progress in the environment. COOP$^2$ then defines cooperative tasks with verifiable cooperative requirements, allowing us to analyze how cooperation unfolds over time with respect to task progress, as well as where and why cooperation breaks down. Building on this framework, we develop COOP$^2$-Repair, which predicts constraint failures from group plans and opens targeted repair channels for guided revisions. Across two environments and three communication structures, COOP$^2$-Repair improves task success and constraint satisfaction while exposing the additional decision overhead and communication load required for repair. The project web page can be found at: https://happyeureka.github.io/coop2.

2026-02-27T22:28:33Z Hanqing Yang Narjes Nourzad Shiyu Chen Marie Siew Jingdi Chen Carlee Joe-Wong