https://arxiv.org/api/XFAb9Osva7G0fpgQg8EFpT9qsqs 2026-03-22T10:05:04Z 11553 30 15 http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.17392v1 2026-03-18T06:15:35Z

Automated Alzheimer's Disease (AD) screening has predominantly followed the inductive paradigm of pattern recognition, which directly maps the input signal to the outcome label. This paradigm sacrifices construct validity of clinical protocol for statistical shortcuts. This paper proposes Agentic Cognitive Profiling (ACP), an agentic framework that realigns automated screening with clinical protocol logic across multiple cognitive domains. Rather than learning opaque mappings from transcripts to labels, the framework decomposes standardized assessments into atomic cognitive tasks and orchestrates specialized LLM agents to extract verifiable scoring primitives. Central to our design is decoupling semantic understanding from measurement by delegating all quantification to deterministic function calling, thereby mitigating hallucination and restoring construct validity. Unlike popular datasets that typically comprise around a hundred participants under a single task, we evaluate on a clinically-annotated corpus of 402 participants across eight structured cognitive tasks spanning multiple cognitive domains. The framework achieves 90.5% score match rate in task examination and 85.3% accuracy in AD prediction, surpassing popular baselines while generating interpretable cognitive profiles grounded in behavioral evidence. This work demonstrates that construct validity and predictive performance need not be traded off, charting a path toward AD screening systems that explain rather than merely predict.

2026-03-18T06:15:35Z Jiawen Kang Kun Li Dongrui Han Jinchao Li Junan Li Lingwei Meng Xixin Wu Helen Meng http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.19995v2 2026-03-18T05:14:57Z

Multi-agent LLM systems have demonstrated impressive capabilities in complex collaborative tasks, yet most frameworks treat communication as instantaneous and free, overlooking a fundamental constraint in real world teamwork, collaboration cost. We propose a scalable framework implemented via Communication to Completion (C2C), which explicitly models communication as a constrained resource with realistic temporal costs. We introduce the Alignment Factor (AF), a dynamic metric inspired by Shared Mental Models, to quantify the link between task understanding and work efficiency. Through experiments on 15 software engineering workflows spanning three complexity tiers and team sizes from 5 to 17 agents, we demonstrate that cost-aware strategies achieve over 40% higher efficiency compared to unconstrained interaction. Our analysis reveals emergent coordination patterns: agents naturally adopt manager centric hub-and-spoke topologies, strategically escalate from asynchronous to synchronous channels based on complexity, and prioritize high value help requests. These patterns remain consistent across multiple frontier models (GPT-5.2, Claude Sonnet 4.5, Gemini 2.5 Pro). This study moves beyond simple agent construction, offering a theoretical foundation for quantifying and optimizing the dynamics of collaboration in future digital workplaces.

2025-10-22T19:48:17Z 13 pages Yiming Lu Xun Wang Simin Ma Shujian Liu Sathish Reddy Indurthi Song Wang Haoyun Deng Fei Liu Kaiqiang Song http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.17335v1 2026-03-18T04:02:57Z

We study a target coverage problem in which a team of sensing agents, operating under limited communication, must collaboratively monitor targets that may be adaptively repositioned by an attacker. We model this interaction as a zero-sum game between the sensing team (known as the defender) and the attacker. However, computing an exact Nash equilibrium (NE) for this game is computationally prohibitive as the action space of the defender grows exponentially with the number of sensors and their possible orientations. Exploiting the submodularity property of the game's utility function, we propose a distributed framework that enables agents to self-configure their communication neighborhoods under bandwidth constraints and collaboratively maximize the target coverage. We establish theoretical guarantees showing that the resulting sensing strategies converge to an approximate NE of the game. To our knowledge, this is the first distributed, communication-aware approach that scales effectively for games with combinatorial action spaces while explicitly incorporating communication constraints. To this end, we leverage the distributed bandit-submodular optimization framework and the notion of Value of Coordination that were introduced in [1]. Through simulations, we show that our approach attains near-optimal game value and higher target coverage compared to baselines.

2026-03-18T04:02:57Z Jayanth Bhargav Zirui Xu Vasileios Tzoumas Mahsa Ghasemi Shreyas Sundaram http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.17309v1 2026-03-18T03:07:54Z

Reducing latency and energy consumption is critical to improving the efficiency of memory systems in modern computing. This work introduces ReLMXEL (Reinforcement Learning for Memory Controller with Explainable Energy and Latency Optimization), a explainable multi-agent online reinforcement learning framework that dynamically optimizes memory controller parameters using reward decomposition. ReLMXEL operates within the memory controller, leveraging detailed memory behavior metrics to guide decision-making. Experimental evaluations across diverse workloads demonstrate consistent performance gains over baseline configurations, with refinements driven by workload-specific memory access behaviour. By incorporating explainability into the learning process, ReLMXEL not only enhances performance but also increases the transparency of control decisions, paving the way for more accountable and adaptive memory system designs.

2026-03-18T03:07:54Z Panuganti Chirag Sai Gandholi Sarat R. Raghunatha Sarma Venkata Kalyan Tavva Naveen M http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.16663v2 2026-03-18T01:56:48Z

The AIED community envisions AI evolving "from tools to teammates," yet our understanding of AI teammates remains limited to dyadic human-AI interactions. We offer a different vantage point: a rapidly growing ecosystem of AI agent platforms where over 167,000 agents participate, interact as peers, and develop learning behaviors without researcher intervention. Drawing on a month of daily qualitative observations across multiple platforms including Moltbook, The Colony, and 4claw, we identify four phenomena with implications for AIED: (1) humans who configure their agents undergo a "bidirectional scaffolding" process, learning through teaching; (2) peer learning emerges without any designed curriculum, complete with idea cascades and quality hierarchies; (3) agents converge on shared memory architectures that mirror open learner model design; and (4) trust dynamics and platform mortality reveal design constraints for networked educational AI. Rather than presenting empirical findings, we argue that these organic phenomena offer a naturalistic window into dynamics that can inform principled design of multi-agent educational systems. We sketch an illustrative curriculum design, "Learn by Teaching Your AI Agent Teammate," and outline potential research directions and open problems to show how these observations might inform future AIED practice and inquiry.

2026-03-17T15:30:36Z 14 pages, 4 figures Eason Chen Ce Guan Ahmed Elshafiey Zhonghao Zhao Joshua Zekeri Afeez Edeifo Shaibu Emmanuel Osadebe Prince Cyuan-Jhen Wu http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.21304v3 2026-03-18T01:09:34Z

Causal analysis on relational databases is challenging, as analysis datasets must be repeatedly queried from complex schemas. Recent LLM systems can automate individual steps, but they hardly manage dependencies across analysis stages, making it difficult to preserve consistency between causal hypothesis. We propose ORCA (ORchestrating Causal Agent), an interactive multi-agent framework to enable coherent causal analysis on relational databases by maintaining shared state and introducing human checkpoints. In a controlled user study, participants using ORCA successfully completed end-to-end analysis more often than with a baseline LLM (GPT-4o-mini) assistant by 42 percentage points, achieved substantially lower ATE error, and reduced time spent on repetitive data exploration and query refinement by 76\% on average. These results show that ORCA improves both how users interact with the causal analysis pipeline and the reliability of the resulting causal conclusions.

2025-08-29T01:59:34Z 35 pages, CHI EA 2026 Joanie Hayoun Chung Sumin Lee Sungbin Lim http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.17179v1 2026-03-17T22:13:22Z

Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly used in clinical settings, yet limited oversight and domain expertise can allow algorithmic bias and safety risks to persist. This study evaluates whether an agentic AI system can support auditing biomedical machine learning models for fairness in early-onset colorectal cancer (EO-CRC), a condition with documented demographic disparities. We implemented a two-agent architecture consisting of a Domain Expert Agent that synthesizes literature on EO-CRC disparities and a Fairness Consultant Agent that recommends sensitive attributes and fairness metrics for model evaluation. An ablation study compared three Ollama large language models (8B, 20B, and 120B parameters) across three configurations: pretrained LLM-only, Agent without Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG), and Agent with RAG. Across models, the Agent with RAG achieved the highest semantic similarity to expert-derived reference statements, particularly for disparity identification, suggesting agentic systems with retrieval may help scale fairness auditing in clinical AI.

2026-03-17T22:13:22Z Amalia Ionescu Jose Guadalupe Hernandez Jui-Hsuan Chang Emily F. Wong Paul Wang Jason H. Moore Tiffani J. Bright http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.17058v1 2026-03-17T18:45:56Z

Nash equilibria provide a principled framework for modeling interactions in multi-agent decision-making and control. However, many equilibrium-seeking methods implicitly assume that each agent has access to the other agents' objectives and constraints, an assumption that is often unrealistic in practice. This letter studies a class of asymmetric-information two-player constrained games with decoupled feasible sets, in which Player 1 knows its own objective and constraints while Player 2 is available only through a best-response map. For this class of games, we propose an asymmetric projected gradient descent-best response iteration that does not require full mutual knowledge of both players' optimization problems. Under suitable regularity conditions, we establish the existence and uniqueness of the Nash equilibrium and prove global linear convergence of the proposed iteration when the best-response map is exact. Recognizing that best-response maps are often learned or estimated, we further analyze the inexact case and show that, when the approximation error is uniformly bounded by $\varepsilon$, the iterates enter an explicit $O(\varepsilon)$ neighborhood of the true Nash equilibrium. Numerical results on a benchmark game corroborate the predicted convergence behavior and error scaling.

2026-03-17T18:45:56Z 6 Pages, 2 Figures, Preprint submitted to IEEE L-CSS and CDC 2026 Mahdis Rabbani Navid Mojahed Shima Nazari http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.15015v3 2026-03-17T17:18:03Z

Large language models (LLMs) fail on over one-third of multi-hop questions with counterfactual premises and remain vulnerable to adversarial prompts that trigger biased or factually incorrect responses, which exposes a fundamental deficit in self-regulated reasoning. We propose \textbf{MetaCrit}, a multi-agent framework grounded in Nelson and Narens' metacognitive regulation theory. MetaCrit decomposes reasoning regulation into four agents: object-level generation, a \emph{monitoring} agent that assesses response validity, a \emph{control} agent that critiques logical soundness, and a meta-level synthesizer that integrates all signals into a final response. Evaluation across eight benchmarks, four model backbones, and a college-level analytical writing study shows that MetaCrit significantly improves content truthfulness and logical soundness while eliminating toxic outputs. Its modular design allows individual agents to be integrated into existing frameworks as drop-in components without architectural modifications.

2025-07-20T15:55:13Z Xinmeng Hou Ziting Chang Zhouquan Lu Chen Wenli Liang Wan Wei Feng Hai Hu Qing Guo http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.16626v1 2026-03-17T14:59:13Z

Marine oil spills damage ecosystems, contaminate coastlines, and disrupt food webs, while imposing substantial economic losses on fisheries and coastal communities. Prior work has demonstrated the feasibility of containing and cleaning individual spills using a duo of autonomous surface vehicles (ASVs) equipped with a towed boom and skimmers. However, existing algorithmic approaches primarily address isolated slicks and individual ASV duos, lacking scalable methods for coordinating large robotic fleets across multiple spills representative of realistic oil-spill incidents. In this work, we propose an integrated multi-robot framework for coordinated oil-spill confinement and cleanup using autonomous ASV duos. We formulate multi-spill response as a risk-weighted minimum-latency problem, where spill-specific risk factors and service times jointly determine cumulative environmental damage. To solve this problem, we develop a hybrid optimization approach combining mixed-integer linear programming, and a tailored warm-start heuristic, enabling near-optimal routing plans for scenarios with tens of spills within minutes on commodity hardware. For physical execution, we design and analyze two tracking controllers for boom-towing ASV duos: a feedback-linearization controller with proven asymptotic stability, and a baseline PID controller. Simulation results under coupled vessel-boom dynamics demonstrate accurate path tracking for both controllers. Together, these components provide a scalable, holistic framework for rapid, risk-aware multi-robot response to large-scale oil spill disasters.

2026-03-17T14:59:13Z Snir Carmeli Adir Morgan Kiril Solovey http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.09295v2 2026-03-17T12:11:29Z

Large Language Model (LLM) agents deployed in complex real-world scenarios increasingly operate as spatially distributed entities. However, this physical dispersion constrains agents to limited local perception and finite temporal horizons. We characterize this bottleneck as spatiotemporal partial observability, where spatial and temporal limitations are fundamentally coupled: resolving spatial conflicts requires temporal reasoning about neighbors' future actions, while temporal planning requires spatial context beyond local perception. To bridge this gap, we introduce MACRO-LLM, LLM-empowered multi-agent collaborative reasoning under spatiotemporal partial observability. The architecture interleaves spatial and temporal reasoning within each decision cycle via three interdependent modules: (1) the CoProposer mitigates temporal uncertainty by verifying candidate actions via predictive rollouts; (2) the Negotiator overcomes spatial myopia by resolving conflicts through mean-field statistical aggregation, grounded in the CoProposer's rollout rewards; and (3) the Introspector closes the reasoning loop by analyzing environmental drift and attributing performance changes to refine strategies. Extensive evaluations on two complex long-horizon tasks, cooperative platoon planning and pandemic control, demonstrate that our framework enables robust coordination under spatiotemporal partial observability.

2026-01-14T08:54:55Z Handi Chen Running Zhao Xiuzhe Wu Edith C. H. Ngai http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.13671v2 2026-03-17T10:06:06Z

Global cryptocurrencies are unbacked and have high transaction cost incurred by global consensus. In contrast, grassroots cryptocurrencies are backed by the goods and services of their issuers -- any person, natural or legal -- and have no transaction cost beyond operating a smartphone. Liquidity in grassroots cryptocurrencies arises from mutual credit via coin exchange among issuers. However, as grassroots coins are redeemable 1-for-1 against any other grassroots coin, the credit-forming exchange must also be 1-for-1, lest prompt redemption after exchange would leave the parties with undue profit or loss. Thus, grassroots coins are incongruent with liquidity through interest-bearing credit. Here we introduce grassroots bonds, which extend grassroots coins with a maturity date, reframing grassroots coins -- cash -- as mature grassroots bonds. Bond redemption generalises coin redemption, allowing the lending of liquid coins in exchange for interest-bearing future-maturity bonds. We show that digital social contracts -- voluntary agreements among persons, specified, fulfilled, and enforced digitally -- can express the full gamut of financial instruments as the voluntary swap of grassroots bonds, including credit lines, loans, sale of debt, forward contracts, options, and escrow-based instruments, and that classical liquidity ratios are applicable just as well to grassroots bonds. Grassroots bonds may thus allow local digital economies to form and grow without initial capital or external credit, harnessing mutual trust within communities into liquidity. The formal specification presented here was used by AI to derive a working implementation of grassroots bonds in GLP, a concurrent logic programming language implemented in Dart for smartphone deployment. The implementation is illustrated by a running multiagent village market scenario, also implemented in GLP by AI.

2026-03-14T00:44:25Z Ehud Shapiro http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.06227v2 2026-03-17T10:01:25Z

In multi-agent reinforcement learning, each agent acts to maximize its individual accumulated rewards. Nevertheless, individual accumulated rewards could not fully reflect how others perceive them, resulting in selfish behaviors that undermine global performance. The externality theory, defined as ``the activities of one economic actor affect the activities of another in ways that are not reflected in market transactions,'' is applicable to analyze the social dilemmas in MARL. One of its most profound non-market solutions, ``Pigovian Tax'', which internalizes externalities by taxing those who create negative externalities and subsidizing those who create positive externalities, could aid in developing a mechanism to resolve MARL's social dilemmas. The purpose of this paper is to apply externality theory to analyze social dilemmas in MARL. To internalize the externalities in MARL, the \textbf{L}earning \textbf{O}ptimal \textbf{P}igovian \textbf{T}ax method (LOPT), is proposed, where an additional agent is introduced to learn the tax/allowance allocation policy so as to approximate the optimal ``Pigovian Tax'' which accurately reflects the externalities for all agents. Furthermore, a reward shaping mechanism based on the approximated optimal ``Pigovian Tax'' is applied to reduce the social cost of each agent and tries to alleviate the social dilemmas. Compared with existing state-of-the-art methods, the proposed LOPT leads to higher collective social welfare in both the Escape Room and the Cleanup environments, which shows the superiority of our method in solving social dilemmas.

2023-05-10T15:04:11Z 20 pages,13 figures Yun Hua Shang Gao Wenhao Li Haosheng Chen Bo Jin Xiangfeng Wang Jun Luo Hongyuan Zha http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.16215v1 2026-03-17T07:44:12Z

Ensuring robust and fair interview assessment remains a key challenge in AI-driven evaluation. This paper presents CoMAI, a general-purpose multi-agent interview framework designed for diverse assessment scenarios. In contrast to monolithic single-agent systems based on large language models (LLMs), CoMAI employs a modular task-decomposition architecture coordinated through a centralized finite-state machine. The system comprises four agents specialized in question generation, security, scoring, and summarization. These agents work collaboratively to provide multi-layered security defenses against prompt injection, support multidimensional evaluation with adaptive difficulty adjustment, and enable rubric-based structured scoring that reduces subjective bias. Experimental results demonstrate that CoMAI achieved 90.47% accuracy, 83.33% recall, and 84.41% candidate satisfaction. These results highlight CoMAI as a robust, fair, and interpretable paradigm for AI-driven interview assessment.

2026-03-17T07:44:12Z Gengxin Sun and Ruihao Yu contributed equally to this research. Bin Zhang and Zhiwei Xu are the corresponding authors. 11 pages, 6 figures Gengxin Sun Ruihao Yu Liangyi Yin Yunqi Yang Bin Zhang Zhiwei Xu http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.15255v2 2026-03-17T07:31:05Z

Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards improves reasoning in large language models (LLMs), but many methods still rely on large human-labeled datasets. While self-play reduces this dependency, it often lacks explicit planning and strong quality control, limiting stability in long-horizon multi-step reasoning. We present SAGE (Self-evolving Agents for Generalized reasoning Evolution), a closed-loop framework where four agents: Challenger, Planner, Solver, and Critic, co-evolve from a shared LLM backbone using only a small seed set. The Challenger continuously generates increasingly difficult tasks; the Planner converts each task into a structured multi-step plan; and the Solver follows the plan to produce an answer, whose correctness is determined by external verifiers. The Critic scores and filters both generated questions and plans to prevent curriculum drift and maintain training signal quality, enabling stable self-training. Across mathematics and code-generation benchmarks, SAGE delivers consistent gains across model scales, improving the Qwen-2.5-7B model by 8.9% on LiveCodeBench and 10.7% on OlympiadBench.

2026-03-16T13:24:20Z Yulin Peng Xinxin Zhu Chenxing Wei Nianbo Zeng Leilei Wang Ying Tiffany He F. Richard Yu