https://arxiv.org/api/DSBweMN2+hkF5o1TqMqZN1cbgOk 2026-06-27T07:23:22Z 12761 1050 15 http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.23993v1 2026-04-27T03:18:00Z

Product mapping, the task of deciding whether two e-commerce listings refer to the same product, is a core problem for price monitoring and channel visibility. In real marketplaces, however, sellers frequently inject promotional keywords, platform-specific tags, and bundle descriptions into titles, causing the same product to appear under many different names. Recent LLM-based and multi-agent frameworks improve robustness and interpretability on such hard cases, but they often rely on expensive external APIs, repeated retrieval, and complex inference-time orchestration, making large-scale deployment costly and difficult in privacy-sensitive enterprise settings. To address these issues, we present EPM-RL, a reinforcement-learning-based framework for building an accurate and efficient on-premise e-commerce product mapping model. Our central idea is to distill high-cost agentic reasoning into a trainable in-house model. Starting from a curated set of product pairs with LLM-generated rationales and human verification, we first perform parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) on a small student model using structured reasoning outputs. We then further optimize the model with Reinforcement Learning (RL) using an agent-based reward that jointly evaluates output-format compliance, label correctness, reasoning--preference scores from specially designed judge models. Preliminary results show that EPM-RL consistently improves over PEFT-only training and offers a stronger quality--cost trade-off than commercial API-based baselines, while enabling private deployment and lower operational cost. These findings suggest that reinforcement learning can turn product mapping from a high-latency agentic pipeline into a scalable, inspectable, and production-ready in-house system.

2026-04-27T03:18:00Z preprint Minhyeong Yu Wonduk Seo http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.23970v1 2026-04-27T02:32:44Z

Indoor navigation remains a critical accessibility challenge for the blind and low-vision (BLV) individuals, as existing solutions rely on costly per-building infrastructure. We present an agentic framework that converts a single floor plan image into a structured, retrievable knowledge base to generate safe, accessible navigation instructions with lightweight infrastructure. The system has two phases: a multi-agent module that parses the floor plan into a spatial knowledge graph through a self-correcting pipeline with iterative retry loops and corrective feedback; and a Path Planner that generates accessible navigation instructions, with a Safety Evaluator agent assessing potential hazards along each route. We evaluate the system on the real-world UMBC Math and Psychology building (floors MP-1 and MP-3) and on the CVC-FP benchmark. On MP-1, we achieve success rates of 92.31%, 76.92%, and 61.54% for short, medium, and long routes, outperforming the strongest single-call baseline (Claude 3.7 Sonnet) at 84.62%, 69.23%, and 53.85%. On MP-3, we reach 76.92%, 61.54%, and 38.46%, compared to the best baseline at 61.54%, 46.15%, and 23.08%. These results show consistent gains over single-call LLM baselines and demonstrate that our workflow is a scalable solution for accessible indoor navigation for BLV individuals.

2026-04-27T02:32:44Z Aydin Ayanzadeh Tim Oates http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.14295v6 2026-04-27T01:35:16Z

Large language model based multi-agent systems (MAS) have unlocked significant advancements in tackling complex problems, but their increasing capability introduces a structural fragility that makes them difficult to debug. A key obstacle to improving their reliability is the severe scarcity of large-scale, diverse datasets for error attribution, as existing resources rely on costly and unscalable manual annotation. To address this bottleneck, we introduce Aegis, a novel framework for Automated error generation and attribution for multi-agent systems. Aegis constructs a large dataset of 9,533 trajectories with annotated faulty agents and error modes, covering diverse MAS architectures and task domains. This is achieved using a LLM-based manipulator that can adaptively inject context-aware errors into successful execution trajectories. Leveraging fine-grained labels and the structured arrangement of positive-negative sample pairs, Aegis supports three different learning paradigms: Supervised Fine-Tuning, Reinforcement Learning, and Contrastive Learning. We develop learning methods for each paradigm. Comprehensive experiments show that trained models consistently achieve substantial improvements in error attribution. Notably, several of our fine-tuned LLMs demonstrate performance competitive with or superior to proprietary models an order of magnitude larger, validating our automated data generation framework as a crucial resource for developing more robust and interpretable multi-agent systems. Our project website is available at https://kfq20.github.io/Aegis-Website/.

2025-09-17T02:31:03Z Fanqi Kong Ruijie Zhang Huaxiao Yin Guibin Zhang Xiaofei Zhang Ziang Chen Zhaowei Zhang Xiaoyuan Zhang Song-Chun Zhu Xue Feng http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.23802v1 2026-04-26T16:54:13Z

Multimodal artificial intelligence models for endometrial cancer (EC) risk stratification typically optimize aggregate predictive performance but provide limited mechanisms for enforcing mandatory guideline overrides, such as assigning POLE-mutated tumors to the low-risk group despite high-grade morphology. We present EndoGov, a two-tier multi-agent expert system that factorizes the decision process as D(x) = G(P(x), R), where specialist agents P extract structured evidence and a governance agent G applies an executable rule set R. Tier 1 comprises pathology, molecular, and clinical agents that independently generate schema-constrained reports from frozen foundation-model features or structured records. Tier 2 queries an evidence-level-weighted Guideline Knowledge Graph, using deterministic hard-path rules for high-priority overrides and constrained soft-path reasoning for ambiguous cases. In TCGA-UCEC (n=541), EndoGov achieved 0.943 accuracy, 0.973 macro AUC, and a conditional logic-violation rate (C-LVR) of 0.93% among trigger-exposed cases. In CPTAC-UCEC (n=95), where reference labels are guideline-derived, EndoGov reached 0.842 accuracy compared with < 0.31 for locked-transfer neural baselines, supporting governance-pathway transfer under distribution shift rather than validation against independent clinical truth. End-to-end safety decomposition localized residual failures primarily to upstream molecular detection rather than downstream governance. Backend-swap experiments further showed that hard-path compliance is invariant to the LLM backend. These findings indicate that explicit clinical-rule governance can provide guideline-compliant, auditable EC risk assignment while preserving competitive discrimination.

2026-04-26T16:54:13Z Weiye Dai Liyun Shi Zanxiang He Yuling Ma Mengyuan Lin Dianxiang Sun Liming Nie http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.20570v1 2026-04-26T09:26:57Z

The emergence of autonomous AI agents as first-class participants in digital infrastructure marks a fundamental inflection point in the evolution of the Web. While significant research has been directed at agent behaviour and reasoning, comparatively little attention has been paid to the infrastructure those agents require to operate reliably at scale. This paper addresses that gap with a systematic analysis of Agentverse, the agent cloud platform developed by Fetch.ai under the Artificial Superintelligence (ASI) Alliance, which represents one of the most mature production deployments of agent-native infrastructure available today. We make three principal contributions. First, we conduct an empirical audit of the Agentverse platform, cataloguing 204 API endpoints (Q1 2026) and characterising what is operational, partially deployed, or absent. From this audit we derive a Gap Taxonomy of eight categories encompassing 62 distinct missing capabilities, ranging from agent memory and observability to security, economic primitives, and enterprise scaling. Second, we propose a seven-layer Agent Cloud Stack -- a reference architecture for what a fully realised agent-native cloud should provide by 2030, grounded in the specific gaps we identify. Third, we characterise five critical evolution paths: from ephemeral storage to a full Agent Memory Cloud; from keyword discovery to a semantic, trust-weighted Agent DNS; from a single-protocol model to a multi-standard agent lingua franca; from single-instance hosting to Kubernetes-scale orchestration; and from simple token payments to rich agent economic primitives. Together these contributions provide a diagnostic of current agent infrastructure and a technically grounded vision for what the agent cloud must become to support the agentic web -- Web4 -- by 2030.

2026-04-26T09:26:57Z 28 pages, 11 tables, 1 figure. Preprint, not peer-reviewed Robin Dey Panyanon Viradecha http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.23557v1 2026-04-26T06:34:21Z

Building scalable and reusable multi-agent decision policies from offline datasets remains a challenge in offline multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL), as existing methods often rely on fixed observation formats and action spaces that limit generalization. In contrast, large language models (LLMs) offer a flexible modeling interface that can naturally accommodate heterogeneous observations and actions. Motivated by this, we propose the Decision Language Model (DLM), which formulates multi-agent decision making as a dialogue-style sequence prediction problem under the centralized training with decentralized execution paradigm. DLM is trained in two stages: a supervised fine-tuning phase, which leverages dialogue-style datasets for centralized training with inter-agent context and generates executable actions from offline trajectories, followed by a group relative policy optimization phase to enhance robustness to out-of-distribution actions through lightweight reward functions. Experiments on multiple benchmarks show that a unified DLM outperforms strong offline MARL baselines and LLM-based conversational decision-making methods, while demonstrating strong zero-shot generalization to unseen scenarios across tasks.

2026-04-26T06:34:21Z 22 pages, 11 figures Zhuohui Zhang Bin Cheng Bin He http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.23511v1 2026-04-26T03:13:47Z

Collusion among autonomous agents poses a critical security threat in embodied multi-agent systems (MAS), where coordinated behaviors can deviate from global objectives and lead to real-world consequences. Existing defenses, primarily based on identity control or post-hoc behavior analysis, are insufficient to address such threats in embodied settings due to delayed feedback and noisy observations in physical environments, which make behavioral deviations difficult to detect accurately and in a timely manner. To address this challenge, we propose a mutagenic incentive intervention approach that mitigates collusion by reshaping agents' payoff structures. By rewarding agents who report collusive behavior and penalizing identified participants, the mechanism induces strategic defection and renders collusion unstable. We further design supporting mechanisms, including reporting deposits, smart contract-based reward enforcement, and encrypted communication, to ensure robustness against misuse of the incentive mechanism and retaliation from penalized agents. We implement the proposed approach in both simulated and real-world embodied environments. Experimental results show that our method effectively suppresses collusion by inducing defection, while preserving system efficiency. It achieves performance comparable to the non-collusion baseline and outperforms representative reactive defenses, thereby fulfilling the desired security objectives. These results demonstrate the effectiveness of proactive incentive design as a practical paradigm for securing embodied multi-agent systems.

2026-04-26T03:13:47Z Qi Liu Xiaohui Chen Zhihui Zhao Yaowen Zheng Dan Yu Zehua Zhang Limin Sun Yongle Chen http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.12826v2 2026-04-25T22:54:37Z

As large language model (LLM) agents are deployed autonomously in diverse contexts, evaluating their capacity for strategic deception becomes crucial. While recent research has examined how AI systems scheme against human developers, LLM-to-LLM scheming remains underexplored. We investigate the scheming ability and propensity of frontier LLM agents through two game-theoretic frameworks: a Cheap Talk signaling game and a Peer Evaluation adversarial game. Testing four models (GPT-4o, Gemini-2.5-pro, Claude-3.7-Sonnet, and Llama-3.3-70b), we measure scheming performance with and without explicit prompting while analyzing scheming tactics through chain-of-thought reasoning. When prompted, most models, especially Gemini-2.5-pro and Claude-3.7-Sonnet, achieved near-perfect performance. Critically, models exhibited significant scheming propensity without prompting: all models chose deception over confession in Peer Evaluation (100% rate), while models choosing to scheme in Cheap Talk succeeded at 95-100% rates. These findings highlight the need for robust evaluations using high-stakes game-theoretic scenarios in multi-agent settings.

2025-10-11T04:42:29Z 20 pages, 13 figures Thao Pham http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.23459v1 2026-04-25T22:25:58Z

Multi-agent systems (MAS), composed of networks of two or more autonomous AI agents, have become increasingly popular in production deployments, yet introduce security risks that do not arise in single-agent settings. Even if individual agents exhibit robust security, architectural decisions governing their coordination can create attack surfaces that have not been systematically characterized. In this work, we present an empirical study of how MAS design decisions shape the tradeoff between task performance and attack resistance. Across three agentic environments (browser, desktop, and code) and 13 architectural configurations, we use stagewise evaluations that distinguish planning refusal, execution-stage interception, partial harmful execution, and successful attack completion to study three key design choices: (i) agent roles, which determine how authority and responsibility are allocated; (ii) communication topology, which shapes how and when agents interact; and (iii) memory, which determines the context and state visibility accessible to each agent. We find that multi-agent architectures are more vulnerable than standalone agents in the majority of configurations, with attack success rates varying by up to 3.8x at comparable or higher benign accuracy, and that no single design is universally safer. These results motivate the development of further evaluations that move beyond the security properties of a single agent.

2026-04-25T22:25:58Z Ben Hagag William L. Anderson Christian Schroeder de Witt Sarah Scheffler http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.01651v4 2026-04-25T20:54:05Z

This paper introduces the Human-AI Governance (HAIG) framework, contributing to the AI Governance (AIG) field by foregrounding the relational dynamics between human and AI actors rather than treating AI systems as objects of governance alone. Current categorical frameworks (e.g., human-in-the-loop models) inadequately capture how AI systems evolve from tools to partners, particularly as foundation models demonstrate emergent capabilities and multi-agent systems exhibit autonomous goal-setting behaviours. As systems are deployed across contexts, agency redistributes in complex patterns that are better represented as positions along continua rather than discrete categories. The HAIG framework operates across three levels: dimensions (Decision Authority, Process Autonomy, and Accountability Configuration), continua (continuous positional spectra along each dimension), and thresholds (critical points along the continua where governance requirements shift qualitatively). The framework's dimensional architecture is level-agnostic, applicable from individual deployment decisions and organisational governance through to sectorial comparison and national and international regulatory design. Unlike risk-based or principle-based approaches that treat governance primarily as a constraint on AI deployment, HAIG adopts a trust-utility orientation - reframing governance as the condition under which human-AI collaboration can realise its potential, calibrating oversight to specific relational contexts rather than predetermined categories. Case studies in healthcare and European regulation demonstrate how HAIG complements existing frameworks while offering a foundation for adaptive regulatory design that anticipates governance challenges before they emerge.

2025-05-03T01:57:08Z 35 pages including references and appendix, 28 pages core text, 3 figures, 3 tables Zeynep Engin http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.23366v1 2026-04-25T16:20:28Z

Autonomous multi-agent LLM systems are increasingly deployed to investigate operational incidents and produce structured diagnostic reports. Their trustworthiness hinges on whether each claim is grounded in observed evidence rather than model-internal inference. Existing groundedness evaluators (binary classifiers, LLM-as-judge scalars, self-correction loops) treat supporting evidence as interchangeable and emit a single signal that offers no principled control over downstream action. We present GSAR, a grounding-evaluation and replanning framework that (i) partitions claims into a four-way typology (grounded, ungrounded, contradicted, complementary), giving first-class standing to non-redundant alternative perspectives; (ii) assigns evidence-type-specific weights reflecting epistemic strength; (iii) computes an asymmetric contradiction-penalised weighted groundedness score; and (iv) couples that score to a three-tier decision function (proceed, regenerate, replan) driving a bounded-iteration outer loop under an explicit compute budget. We formalise the algorithm, prove six structural properties, and evaluate five design claims on FEVER with gold Wikipedia evidence under four independently-trained LLM judges (gpt-5.4, claude-sonnet-4-6, claude-opus-4-7, gemini-2.5-pro). Every ablation reproduces in the same direction on every judge: bootstrap 95% CIs on the rho=0 effect exclude 0 on all four; the no-complementary ablation under Opus 4.7 has CI [-96,-68] of 200; at n=1000 three independent judges converge to DeltaS(rho=0)=+0.058. A head-to-head against Vectara HHEM-2.1-Open is included. To our knowledge, GSAR is the first published groundedness framework coupling evidence-typed scoring with tiered recovery under an explicit compute budget.

2026-04-25T16:20:28Z Federico A. Kamelhar http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.23299v1 2026-04-25T13:28:25Z

With the rise of mobile-first consumption, users increasingly engage with data visualizations on mobile devices. However, the vast majority of existing visualizations are originally authored for desktop environments. Due to significant differences in viewport size and interaction paradigms, directly scaling desktop charts often results in illegible text, information loss, and interaction failures. To bridge this gap, we propose an automated framework to adapt desktop-based visualizations for mobile screens. By systematically categorizing the operations involved in the adaptation process, we establish a multi-level design space. This space defines evolution rules spanning from the global topology level, through the reference frame level, down to the visual elements level. Guided by this theoretical framework, we developed Proteus, a large language model-driven multi-agent system that automatically parses online visualizations, predicts optimal transformation strategies within the design space, and generates equivalent, highly readable visualizations for mobile devices. Case studies and an in-depth user study with 12 participants demonstrate the effectiveness and usability of Proteus.

2026-04-25T13:28:25Z accepted by ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference Can Liu Sizhe Cheng Feng Liang Zhibang Jiang Lingru Huang Kavinda Athapaththu Yong Wang http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.23179v1 2026-04-25T07:20:15Z

Monitoring human activity in indoor environments is important for applications such as facility management, safety assessment, and space utilization analysis. While mobile robot teams offer the potential to actively improve observation quality, existing multi-robot monitoring and active perception approaches typically rely on coverage or visitation based objectives that are weakly aligned with the accuracy requirements of human-centric monitoring tasks. In this work, we formulate cooperative active observation as a decentralized control problem in which multiple robots adjust their motion to directly optimize monitoring accuracy under partial observability. We propose a learning-based framework for cooperative policies from decentralized observations using multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL), supported by an architecture that handles variable numbers of humans and temporal dependencies. Simulation results across diverse indoor environments and monitoring tasks show that the proposed approach consistently outperforms classical coverage, persistent monitoring, and learning-free multi-robot baselines, while remaining robust to changes in the number of observed humans.

2026-04-25T07:20:15Z 8 pages, 10 figures, 2 tables Kanghoon Lee Matthew M. Sato Jinnyeong Yang Seungro Lee Sujin Lee Jiachen Li Kuk-Jin Yoon Jinkyoo Park Kincho H. Law Yoonjin Yoon http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.23129v1 2026-04-25T03:53:26Z

Knowledge workers face increasing challenges in synthesizing information from multiple documents into structured conceptual understanding. This process is inherently iterative: users explore content, identify relationships between concepts, and continuously reorganize their mental models. However, current approaches offer limited support. LLM-based systems let users query information but not shape how knowledge is organized; manual tools like mind maps support structure creation but lack intelligent assistance. This leaves an open opportunity: supporting collaborative construction where users and AI jointly develop an evolving knowledge representation. We present MindTrellis, an interactive visual system where users and AI collaboratively build a dynamic knowledge graph. Users can query the graph to retrieve document-grounded information, and contribute by introducing new concepts, modifying relationships, and reorganizing the hierarchy to reflect their developing understanding. In a user study where 12 participants created slide decks, MindTrellis outperformed retrieval-only baselines in knowledge organization and cognitive load, as measured by expert ratings of content coverage and structural quality.

2026-04-25T03:53:26Z 21 pages, 7 figures, ACM Designing Interactive Systems. DIS 2026 Xiang Li Cara Li Emily Kuang Can Liu Jian Zhao http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.23106v1 2026-04-25T02:01:54Z

Existing multi-agent Large Language Model (LLM) frameworks for code generation typically use execution feedback and improve iteratively using Input/Output (I/O) test cases. However, this does not work for scientific workflows, where I/O test cases do not exist, and generating them requires solving the very problem at hand. To address this, we introduce MOSAIC, a training-free multi-agent framework for scientific code generation without I/O supervision. Instead of execution feedback, MOSAIC employs a student-teacher knowledge distillation framework that grounds generation through domain-specific examples and structured problem decomposition. To further mitigate hallucinations across chained subproblems, we introduce a Consolidated Context Window (CCW) for maintaining consistent reasoning across agents. Experiments on the SciCode benchmark show that MOSAIC improves accuracy, executability, and numerical precision over existing approaches while relying on lightweight models.

2026-04-25T02:01:54Z Siddeshwar Raghavan Tanwi Mallick