Further Comments on Yablo's Construction

2026-03-16T16:13:09Z

We continue our analysis of Yablo's coding of the liar paradox by infinite acyclic graphs. The present notes are based on and continue the author's previous results on the problem. In particular, our approach is often more systematic than before.

Pebble Games and Algebraic Proof Systems

2026-03-16T15:14:45Z

Analyzing refutations of the well known 0pebbling formulas Peb$(G)$ we prove some new strong connections between pebble games and algebraic proof system, showing that there is a parallelism between the reversible, black and black-white pebbling games on one side, and the three algebraic proof systems Nullstellensatz, Monomial Calculus and Polynomial Calculus on the other side. In particular we prove that for any DAG $G$ with a single sink, if there is a Monomial Calculus refutation for Peb$(G)$ having simultaneously degree $s$ and size $t$ then there is a black pebbling strategy on $G$ with space $s$ and time $t+s$. Also if there is a black pebbling strategy for $G$ with space $s$ and time $t$ it is possible to extract from it a MC refutation for Peb$(G)$ having simultaneously degree $s$ and size $ts$. These results are analogous to those proven in {deRezende et al.21} for the case of reversible pebbling and Nullstellensatz. Using them we prove degree separations between NS, MC and PC, as well as strong degree-size tradeoffs for MC. We also notice that for any directed acyclic graph $G$ the space needed in a pebbling strategy on $G$, for the three versions of the game, reversible, black and black-white, exactly matches the variable space complexity of a refutation of the corresponding pebbling formula Peb$(G)$ in each of the algebraic proof systems NS, MC and PC. Using known pebbling bounds on graphs, this connection implies separations between the corresponding variable space measures.

FMP for QD logics. A wrong proof

2026-03-16T11:02:10Z

This paper initially aimed at proposing a proof that quasi-dense logics have f.m.p, but it contains a major flaw, unfixable.

Completeness of Relational Algebra via Cylindric Algebra

2026-03-16T10:50:45Z

An alternative proof of the completeness of relational algebra with respect to allowed formulas of first-order logic is presented. The proof relies on the well-known embedding of relational algebra into cylindric algebra, which makes it possible to establish completeness in a more algebraic way. Building on this proof, we present an alternative algorithm that produces a relational expression equivalent to a given allowed formula. The main motivation for the present work is to establish a proof of completeness suitable for generalisation to relational models handling incomplete or vague information.

Singleton algorithms for the Constraint Satisfaction Problem

2026-03-16T09:11:13Z

A natural strengthening of an algorithm for the (promise) constraint satisfaction problem is its singleton version: we first fix a constraint to a tuple from the constraint relation, then run the algorithm, and remove the tuple from the constraint if the answer is negative. We characterize the power of the singleton versions of standard universal algorithms for the (promise) CSP over a fixed template in terms of the existence of a minion homomorphism. Using the Hales-Jewett theorem, we show that for finite relational structures this minion condition is equivalent to the existence of polymorphisms with certain symmetries, which we call palette symmetric polymorphisms. By proving the existence of such polymorphisms we establish that the singleton version of the BLP+AIP algorithm solves all (multi-sorted) tractable CSPs over domains of size at most 7. We further show that already for domain size 8 there exists a relational structure arising from the dihedral group $D_4$ that does not admit palette symmetric polymorphisms and cannot be solved by singleton BLP+AIP. By providing concrete CSP templates, we illustrate the limitations of linear programming, the power of the singleton versions, and the elegance of palette symmetric polymorphisms. Surprisingly, we also identify a concrete temporal relational structure whose CSP can be solved by a singleton algorithm after sampling, yet it does not admit palette symmetric polymorphisms. This highlights that the Hales-Jewett argument applies only to finite structures. Nevertheless, we introduce generalized palette polymorphisms for every tractable temporal relational structure and show that they yield a rounding procedure implying that the corresponding singleton algorithm solves its CSP after sampling.

Convex algebras on an interval with semicontinuous monotone operations

2026-03-16T08:10:05Z

In a recent work of Matteo Mio on compact quantitative equational theories (here compact means that all its consequences are derivable by means of finite proofs) convex algebras on the carrier set [0,1] whose operations are monotone and satisfy certain semicontinuity properties occurred. We fully classify those algebraic structures by giving an explicit construction of all possible convex operations on [0,1] possessing the mentioned properties. Our result thus describes exactly the range of theories to which Mio's theorem applies.

From Herbrand schemes to functional interpretation

2026-03-16T07:35:53Z

Herbrand schemes are a method to extract Herband disjunctions directly from sequent calculus proofs, without appealing to cut elimination, using a formal grammar known as a higher-order recursion scheme. In this note, we show that the core ideas of Herbrand schemes can be reformulated as a functional interpretation of classical sequent calculus, similar to the functional interpretation of classical logic due to Gerhardy and Kohlenbach.

Terminating Hybrid Tableaus for Ordered Models

2026-03-16T04:57:44Z

Hybrid logic extends modal logic with special propositions called nominals, each of which is true at only one state in a model. This enables us to describe some properties of binary relations, such as irreflexivity and anti-symmetry, which are essential to treat partial orders. We present terminating tableau calculi complete with respect to models whose accessibility relations are strictly partially ordered, unbounded strictly partially ordered, and partially ordered.

Applications of Intuitionistic Temporal Logic to Temporal Answer Set Programming

2026-03-16T01:02:02Z

The relationship between intuitionistic or intermediate logics and logic programming has been extensively studied, prominently featuring Pearce's equilibrium logic and Osorio's safe beliefs. Equilibrium logic admits a fixpoint characterization based on the logic of here-and-there, akin to theory completion in default and autoepistemic logics. Safe beliefs are similarly defined via a fixpoint operator, albeit under the semantics of intuitionistic or other intermediate logics. In this paper, we investigate the logical foundations of Temporal Answer Set Programming through the lens of Temporal Equilibrium Logic, a formalism combining equilibrium logic with linear-time temporal operators. We lift the seminal approaches of Pearce and Osorio to the temporal setting, establishing a formal correspondence between temporal intuitionistic logic and temporal logic programming. Our results deepen the theoretical underpinnings of Temporal Answer Set Programming and provide new avenues for research in temporal reasoning.

Formalizing the Classical Isoperimetric Inequality in the Two-Dimensional Case

2026-03-15T23:35:15Z

We present a formal verification of the classical isoperimetric inequality in the plane using the Lean 4 proof assistant and its mathematical library Mathlib. We follow Adolf Hurwitz's analytic approach to establish the inequality $L^2 \ge 4πA$, which states that among all simple closed curves of a given perimeter $L$, the circle uniquely maximizes the enclosed area $A$. The formalization proceeds in two phases. In the first phase, we establish the Fourier-analytic foundations required by Hurwitz's approach: we formalize orthogonality relations for trigonometric functions over $[-π,π]$, Parseval's theorem for classical Fourier series, uniform convergence of Fourier partial sums via the Weierstrass M-test, term-by-term differentiability, and Wirtinger's inequality. In the second phase, we carry out Hurwitz's proof itself: working with simple closed $C^1$ curves given in arc-length parametrization, we reparametrize over $[0,2π]$, establish the shoelace area formula, apply integration by parts, invoke the AM--GM inequality, apply Wirtinger's inequality, and use the arc-length constraint to derive the bound $A \le L^2/(4π)$. We discuss the key formalization challenges encountered, including the interchange of infinite sums and integrals, term-by-term differentiation, and the coordination of different indexing conventions within Mathlib. The complete formalization is available at https://github.com/mirajcs/IsoperimetricInequality

s2n-bignum-bench: A practical benchmark for evaluating low-level code reasoning of LLMs

2026-03-15T21:55:59Z

Neurosymbolic approaches leveraging Large Language Models (LLMs) with formal methods have recently achieved strong results on mathematics-oriented theorem-proving benchmarks. However, success on competition-style mathematics does not by itself demonstrate the ability to construct proofs about real-world implementations. We address this gap with a benchmark derived from an industrial cryptographic library whose assembly routines are already verified in HOL Light. s2n-bignum is a library used at AWS for providing fast assembly routines for cryptography, and its correctness is established by formal verification. The task of formally verifying this library has been a significant achievement for the Automated Reasoning Group. It involved two tasks: (1) precisely specifying the correct behavior of a program as a mathematical proposition, and (2) proving that the proposition is correct. In the case of s2n-bignum, both tasks were carried out by human experts. In \textit{s2n-bignum-bench}, we provide the formal specification and ask the LLM to generate a proof script that is accepted by HOL Light within a fixed proof-check timeout. To our knowledge, \textit{s2n-bignum-bench} is the first public benchmark focused on machine-checkable proof synthesis for industrial low-level cryptographic assembly routines in HOL Light. This benchmark provides a challenging and practically relevant testbed for evaluating LLM-based theorem proving beyond competition mathematics. The code to set up and use the benchmark is available here: \href{https://github.com/kings-crown/s2n-bignum-bench}{s2n-bignum-bench}.

Scaling the Explanation of Multi-Class Bayesian Network Classifiers

2026-03-15T20:38:06Z

We propose a new algorithm for compiling Bayesian network classifier (BNC) into class formulas. Class formulas are logical formulas that represent a classifier's input-output behavior, and are crucial in the recent line of work that uses logical reasoning to explain the decisions made by classifiers. Compared to prior work on compiling class formulas of BNCs, our proposed algorithm is not restricted to binary classifiers, shows significant improvement in compilation time, and outputs class formulas as negation normal form (NNF) circuits that are OR-decomposable, which is an important property when computing explanations of classifiers.

Circuit Representations of Random Forests with Applications to XAI

2026-03-15T07:58:38Z

We make three contributions in this paper. First, we present an approach for compiling a random forest classifier into a set of circuits, where each circuit directly encodes the instances in some class of the classifier. We show empirically that our proposed approach is significantly more efficient than existing similar approaches. Next, we utilize this approach to further obtain circuits that are tractable for computing the complete and general reasons of a decision, which are instance abstractions that play a fundamental role in computing explanations. Finally, we propose algorithms for computing the robustness of a decision and all shortest ways to flip it. We illustrate the utility of our contributions by using them to enumerate all sufficient reasons, necessary reasons and contrastive explanations of decisions; to compute the robustness of decisions; and to identify all shortest ways to flip the decisions made by random forest classifiers learned from a wide range of datasets.

Normalization for multimodal type theory

2026-03-14T10:36:45Z

We prove normalization for MTT, a general multimodal dependent type theory capable of expressing modal type theories for guarded recursion, internalized parametricity, and various other prototypical modal situations. We prove that deciding type checking and conversion in MTT can be reduced to deciding the equality of modalities in the underlying modal situation, immediately yielding a type checking algorithm for all instantiations of MTT in the literature. This proof uses a generalization of synthetic Tait computability -- an abstract approach to gluing proofs -- to account for modalities. This extension is based on MTT itself, so that this proof also constitutes a significant case study of MTT.

Power Term Polynomial Algebra for Boolean Logic

2026-03-14T09:22:52Z

We introduce power term polynomial algebra, a representation language for Boolean formulae designed to bridge conjunctive normal form (CNF) and algebraic normal form (ANF). The language is motivated by the tiling mismatch between these representations: direct CNF<->ANF conversion may cause exponential blowup unless formulas are decomposed into smaller fragments, typically through auxiliary variables and side constraints. In contrast, our framework addresses this mismatch within the representation itself, compactly encoding structured families of monomials while representing CNF clauses directly, thereby avoiding auxiliary variables and constraints at the abstraction level. We formalize the language through power terms and power term polynomials, define their semantics, and show that they admit algebraic operations corresponding to Boolean polynomial addition and multiplication. We prove several key properties of the language: disjunctive clauses admit compact canonical representations; power terms support local shortening and expansion rewrite rules; and products of atomic terms can be systematically rewritten within the language. Together, these results yield a symbolic calculus that enables direct manipulation of formulas without expanding them into ordinary ANF. The resulting framework provides a new intermediate representation and rewriting calculus that bridges clause-based and algebraic reasoning and suggests new directions for structure-aware CNF<->ANF conversion and hybrid reasoning methods.