Disintegration Temporal Logic for Probabilistic Hyperproperties

2026-07-16T17:27:28Z

We introduce Disintegration Temporal Logic (DTL), a new probabilistic temporal logic that can express a wide range of probabilistic hyperproperties, including probabilistic non-interference and perfect indistinguishability. DTL is based on the notion of measure disintegration from probability theory, which allows for conditioning probabilities on a finite or infinite sequence of events occurring during a program execution. This naturally supports reasoning about interacting stochastic systems, where complete executions of one component induce conditional probability distributions over another. We illustrate applications of DTL to systems interacting with stochastic environments, distributional properties of Markov decision processes, and probabilistic automata on infinite words, and discuss its relationship to existing probabilistic logics. While model checking Markov chains against full DTL is undecidable, we identify two decidable fragments that capture many hyperproperties of interest. The linear fragment admits a polynomial-time model-checking procedure based on linear-algebraic techniques and captures probabilistic information-flow properties such as perfect indistinguishability and history-based probabilistic non-interference. The qualitative fragment admits an automata-theoretic model-checking procedure that extends the standard algorithm for $\mathit{HyperCTL}^*$ with reasoning about bottom strongly connected components.

A Proof in Coq that Core Logic is not Paraconsistent

2026-07-16T17:10:54Z

Tennant claims that his Core logic $\mathbb{C}$ is \emph{paraconsistent}. It means that the sequent of the First Lewis Paradox, i.e. $$\lnot A, A \vdash B$$ is declared false, and its corresponding antisequent, called `Claim~1', i.e. $$\lnot A, A \nvdash B$$ true, as in minimal logic $\mathbf{M}$. We formalise a fragment $\mathcal{F}$ of $\mathbb{C}$ under its two readings, minimal ($\mathcal{F}_{\mathbf{M}}$) and Core ($\mathcal{F}_{\mathbb{C}}$), and certify in Coq and Lean~4 -- with no axiom assumed, every commitment displayed as a named hypothesis -- that antisequent rule $\overline{DNS.1}$ is a metatheorem of $\mathcal{F}_{\mathbf{M}}$, while $\mathcal{F}_{\mathbb{C}}$ derives DNS.2 through Tennant's own rule $R\to_{\mathbb{C}}$. A machine-checked dilemma follows. Read as the assertion that this sequent is \emph{false} in $\mathbb{C}$, bound by the antisequent rules of the shared kernel that Tennant's overlap claim endorses, Claim~1 yields an explicit contradiction. Read as the mere metatheoretic observation that no derivation concludes \mbox{$\lnot A, A \vdash B$}, it concedes the certified non-conservativity of $\mathbb{C}$ over its own kernel -- and the claimed overlap with $\mathbf{M}$ collapses. Either way, the paraconsistency of Core logic cannot be sustained as Tennant asserts it.

Positive Instantial Neighbourhood logic: Typed Completeness and Admissible-Open Representation

2026-07-16T15:46:19Z

Instantial neighbourhood logic is a modal language for neighbourhood frames in which formulas can express information about the kinds of worlds occurring inside a neighbourhood of a given world. In this paper, we study a positive, negation- and implication-free version of instantial neighbourhood logic with two primitive instantial modalities, one of $\Box$-type and one of $\Diamond$-type. Since classical negation is not available, the two modalities are treated independently. We introduce the language and proof system of positive instantial neighbourhood logic (PINL) and interpret it over persistent two-sided neighbourhood models. We then define a typed persistent neighbourhood semantics, used as an auxiliary canonical semantics to control witness and co-witness conditions. This yields a truth lemma and a typed completeness theorem for PINL. On the algebraic side, we introduce $2$-$\mathrm{DLIO}$s, bounded distributive lattices equipped with two families of instantial operations, as the algebraic semantics of PINL. We prove algebraic soundness and completeness via the Lindenbaum $2$-$\mathrm{DLIO}$. Finally, we construct the canonical bitopological PINL-space and show that the algebra of its admissible positive opens is isomorphic to the Lindenbaum $2$-$\mathrm{DLIO}$. Thus the paper establishes a canonical admissible-open representation of positive instantial neighbourhood logic, providing a first step toward a future duality theory.

Adequate Losses via Quantitative Linear Logic

2026-07-16T15:12:26Z

As neural components are increasingly embedded in existing symbolic software -- including safety-critical systems -- the question arises of how to specify and enforce the safety of the newly introduced neural parts. Unlike traditional logical specifications, these must be amenable not only to the standard Boolean interpretation, but also to training and optimisation. The latter calls for a quantitative interpretation of the logical syntax, subject to further requirements such as smoothness and differentiability. Moreover, the qualitative and quantitative sides of the logic must share a unifying proof-theoretic and categorical semantics. Finally, the new logic should link cleanly to the substructural and program logics that underpin the verification of existing symbolic programs. In this paper, we present a logic that ticks all of these boxes. We introduce a family of calculi, pQLL, indexed by a hardness degree $p$, prove a cut-elimination theorem for them, and establish completeness with respect to enriched residuated `soft' lattices. At $p = \infty$, \pQLL reduces to multiplicative additive linear logic (MALL), and provability in pQLL converges to provability in MALL as $p \to \infty$. We express optimisation objectives in the syntax of this logic and prove the quantitative adequacy of neuro-symbolic loss functions -- a result that has eluded the neuro-symbolic machine learning community for nearly a decade.

A categorical formulation of Kraus' paradox

2026-07-16T14:58:13Z

We give a categorical formulation of Kraus' "magic trick" for recovering information from truncated types. Rather than type theory, we work in Van den Berg-Moerdijk path categories with a univalent universe, and rather than propositional truncation we work with arbitrary cofibrations, which includes truncation as a special case. We show, using Kraus' argument that any cofibration with homogeneous domain is a monomorphism. We give some simple concrete examples in groupoids to illustrate the interaction between homogeneous types, cofibrations and univalent fibrations.

Neuro-Symbolic Strong-AI Robots with Closed Knowledge Assumption: Learning and Deductions

2026-07-16T14:57:30Z

Knowledge representation formalisms are aimed to represent general conceptual information and are typically used in the construction of the knowledge base of reasoning agent. A knowledge base can be thought of as representing the beliefs of such an agent. Like a child, a strong-AI (AGI) robot would have to learn through input and experiences, constantly progressing and advancing its abilities over time. Both with statistical AI generated by neural networks we need also the concept of \textsl{causality} of events traduced into directionality of logic entailments and deductions in order to give to robots the emulation of human intelligence. Moreover, by using the axioms we can guarantee the \textsl{controlled security} about robot's actions based on logic inferences. For AGI robots we consider the 4-valued Belnap's bilattice of truth-values with knowledge ordering as well, where the value "unknown" is the bottom value, the sentences with this value are indeed unknown facts, that is, the missed knowledge in the AGI robots. Thus, these unknown facts are not part of the robot's knowledge database, and by learn through input and experiences, the robot's knowledge would be naturally expanded over time. Consequently, this phenomena can be represented by the Closed Knowledge Assumption and Logic Inference provided by this paper. Moreover, the truth-value "inconsistent", which is the top value in the knowledge ordering of Belnap's bilattice, is necessary for strong-AI robots to be able to support such inconsistent information and paradoxes, like Liar paradox, during deduction processes.

Constructibility and the P versus NP problem

2026-07-16T14:30:22Z

The P versus NP problem is addressed in a context of provability and limitations on the possibility of finding sound axioms for formal theories. We construct a particular family D of decision problems and show that under a certain finiteness condition, D contains a problem which is in NP. Further, it is shown that if the term ``constructible theory'' is defined by a specific natural condition, then no constructible and sound formal theory can prove membership in P for any of the decision problems in D.

Towards realistic large random models of labeled transition systems and their 0-1 laws

2026-07-16T14:13:19Z

Model checking is the automated verification of properties (specified in some modal logic) in labeled transition systems (LTSs); it is an essential tool in ensuring software systems function as intended. State spaces of software grow exponentially, and heuristics are needed to ensure model checking remains feasible in real-world applications. Heuristics, in turn, require a good understanding on the typical behaviour of LTSs. In this paper, we use random graph theory to create a probabilistic model of large LTSs. From a theoretical analysis of the creation of large LTSs, backed by empirical data from the Model Checking Contest, we endow these models with realistic parameter values. Then, we analyze the asymptotic behaviour of this model under LTL and CTL, two modal logics popular in model checking. We show that, depending on the precise model, as the size grows to infinity we either have a convergence law (for every formula, the probability that it holds converges to a limit) or a 0-1 law (...and this limit is 0 or 1). We also discuss the theoretical complexity of determining these limits, and give algorithms for doing so. These results are the starting point towards a deep theoretical understanding of typical LTS behaviour, and highlight the promising applicability of random graph theory to model checking. \keywords{Model checking \and Random graphs \and 0-1 laws

Schemata, Cyclic Proofs and Herbrand Systems

2026-07-16T13:52:59Z

Inductive proofs can be represented by proof schemata, a formalism that represents infinite sequences of proofs by recursive definitions. Since proof schemata avoid the explicit application of induction rules, they admit novel applications, one of which is the realization of Herbrand's theorem in the presence of induction. In this paper, we develop a new type of proof schema based on point transition systems. For skolemized proof schemata without quantified cuts, so-called Herbrand systems, that is, schemata of Herbrand instances of quantified formulas, can be computed. Herbrand systems also allow the representation of schemata of Herbrand sequents, thereby realizing Herbrand's theorem for proof schemata. We compare proof schemata with cyclic proofs and define a transformation from a large class of cyclic proofs to proof schemata. Finally, we show that proof schemata based on point transition systems are capable of proving the 2-Hydra statement, a well-known example that is provable by the cyclic proof system CLKIDωbut not in LKID.

Monoidal bicategories, differential linear logic, and analytic functors

2026-07-16T13:50:20Z

We develop further the theory of monoidal bicategories by introducing and studying bicategorical counterparts of the notions of a linear exponential comonad, as considered in the study of linear logic, and of a codereliction transformation, introduced to study differential linear logic via differential categories. As an application, we extend the differential calculus of Joyal's analytic functors to analytic functors between presheaf categories, just as ordinary calculus extends from a single variable to many variables.

A Dichotomy Theorem for Ordinal Ranks in MSO

2026-07-16T13:49:08Z

We focus on formulae $\exists X.\, \varphi(\vec{Y}, X)$ of monadic second-order logic over the full binary tree, such that the witness $X$ is a well-founded set. The ordinal rank $\mathrm{rank}(X) < ω_1$ of such a set $X$ measures its depth and branching structure. We search for the least upper bound for these ranks, and discover the following dichotomy depending on the formula $\varphi$. Let $\mathrm{rank}(\varphi)$ be the minimal ordinal such that, whenever an instance $\vec{Y}$ satisfies the formula, there is a witness $X$ with $\mathrm{rank}(X) \leq \mathrm{rank}(\varphi)$. Then $\mathrm{rank}(\varphi)$ is either strictly smaller than $ω^2$ or it reaches the maximal possible value $ω_1$. Moreover, it is decidable which of the cases holds. The result has potential for applications in a variety of ordinal-related problems, in particular it entails a result about the closure ordinal of a fixed-point formula.

Verification of a DPLL Transition System in Rocq

2026-07-16T13:46:33Z

We present a formal verification of an abstract transition-system presentation of the Davis-Putnam-Logemann-Loveland (DPLL) procedure in the Rocq proof assistant. Following Nieuwenhuis et al., SAT solving is modeled as a set of rule-based transitions between states rather than as a concrete algorithm. We formalize the syntax and semantics of propositional formulas, define the classical and base DPLL transition systems, and prove their key metatheoretic properties. In particular, we establish correctness and completeness with respect to satisfiability, and we prove termination by showing that the transition relation is well-founded. The formalization extends the original abstract system by also including the pure literal rule. Building on the verified transition system, we introduce an abstract notion of strategy and derive a terminating solver from any strategy satisfying suitable conditions. We then implement a concrete strategy in Rocq and show that it satisfies the strategy specification.

3-VASS Reachability is in EXPSPACE

2026-07-16T13:35:56Z

A VASS can be viewed as a finite-state automaton manipulating a fixed number (called its dimension) of counters holding non-negative values. The reachability problem, asking whether there is a run from one configuration, defined by a state and values of the counters, to another configuration, has been a long-standing algorithmic challenge in theoretical computer science. When the dimension is part of the input, the problem has been shown to be ACKERMANN-complete in 2021. For fixed dimension greater than 2, and in particular for dimension 3, the exact complexity of the reachability problem remains unclear. For a long time the known algorithms for the 3-dimensional VASS reachability problem had been non-elementary, while the best known lower bound is merely PSPACE hardness inherited from dimension 2. A recent breakthrough in (Czerwiński, Jecker, Lasota, Orlikowski, ICALP 2025) gave the first elementary upper bound for the problem, namely 2-EXPSPACE. In this paper it is shown that the reachability problem in 3-VASS belongs to EXPSPACE. The proof is based on a hierarchical pumpability analysis, yielding a doubly-exponential length bound on the shortest runs between two configurations.

A Comprehensive History of $μ$CRL and mCRL2

2026-07-16T13:05:19Z

This article gives a historical overview of the background, motivation and development of μCRL and its successor mCRL2, from the inception to the present. Both mCRL2 and μCRL are similar, compact, but very expressive formalisms based on process algebra, term rewriting, and the modal mu-calculus. They are developed to model and analyse the behaviour of interacting systems, i.e., systems that communicate by exchange of messages, among each other and with the outside world. Every contemporary computer system can be viewed as such an interacting system and their communication schemes are difficult to design correctly. By sticking to the mathematical foundations, but being led by the desire to be practically relevant, the formalism has grown to become very versatile. In particular, mCRL2 does not only foster the development of theory and the formulation of correctness proofs, but it is also the basis of a large set of automatic tools that help to provide insight in the behaviour of complex computer controlled systems.

Towards a Bridge Layer Between Bibliographic and Formalized Mathematical Knowledge

2026-07-16T12:51:38Z

Mathematical knowledge is split between bibliographic databases (e.g., MathSciNet, zbMATH Open) and formal proof libraries (e.g., Lean mathlib), preventing unified access between published results and their formalizations. We propose a relational bridge-database that aligns publication metadata with formal artifacts, providing an interoperability layer between mathematical literature and machine-verifiable proofs. We introduce a paper-level formalization score that measures how much of a publication is covered in formal systems. As a feasibility study, we show how such scores can be estimated via cross-document alignment between informal texts and Lean formalizations, enabling large-scale analysis of formalization coverage. This framework is a first step toward integrating bibliographic and formal mathematical ecosystems into scalable, machine-actionable knowledge graphs linking publications to formal proof objects.