https://arxiv.org/api/6luUnoCshEN1jhgmQTSLvVwX/qo2026-03-20T12:49:50Z18901015http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.18955v1Foundational Analysis Of The Solvability Complexity Index: The Weihrauch-SCI Intermediate Hierarchy And A Koopman Operator Example2026-03-19T14:24:40ZThe Solvability Complexity Index (SCI) provides an abstract notion of computing a target map $Ξ$ from finitely many oracle evaluations $Λ\subseteq \mathbb{C}$ via finite-height towers of pointwise limits. We first give a foundational analysis of what this extensional framework does and does not determine. We show that the SCI separation consistency is equivalent to a factorization of $Ξ$ through the full evaluation table, and we isolate the minimal logical role of $Λ$ as an information interface.
To connect the SCI to Type-2 computability and Weihrauch reducibility, we give an effective enrichment for countable $Λ$ by viewing the evaluation table image $I_Λ\subseteq\mathbb{C}^{\mathbb{N}}$ as a represented space and factoring $Ξ$ as $\widehatΞ$. We then define the Weihrauch-SCI rank of a problem as the least number of iterated limit-oracles needed to compute it in the Weihrauch sense, i.e.\ the least $k$ such that $\widehatΞ\le_{W}\lim^{(k)}$, and prove well-posedness and representation invariance of this rank.
A central negative result is that the unrestricted type-$G$ SCI model (arbitrary post-processing of finite oracle transcripts) is generally not comparable to Weihrauch/Type-2 complexity: finite-query factorizations collapse type-$G$ height, and analytic (non-Borel) decision problems yield examples with $\mathrm{SCI}_{G}=0$ but infinite Weihrauch-SCI rank. To recover a robust bridge, we introduce an intermediate SCI hierarchy by restricting the admissible base-level post-processing to regularity classes (continuous/Borel/Baire) and, optionally, to fixed-query versus adaptive-query policies. We prove that these restrictions form genuine hierarchies, and we establish comparison theorems showing what each restriction logically enforces (e.g.\ Borel towers compute only Borel targets; continuous-base towers yield finite Baire class).2026-03-19T14:24:40Z62 pages: 39 pages + AppendixChristopher Sorghttp://arxiv.org/abs/2512.00081v7The Orientation Boundary for Step-Duplicating Recursors: Mechanized Impossibility, Escape, and Certification2026-03-19T10:44:02ZWe formalize the orientation boundary for first-order step-duplicating recursors. At the schema, no measure in twelve formalized direct classes strictly orients the duplicating step uniformly. These classes include additive and transparent-compositional measures, affine and nonlinear scalar extensions, and tracked vector/pair families, together with a scalar-projection meta-theorem for the matrix side and a symbolic variable-condition barrier yielding a KBO-style impossibility corollary. To our knowledge, this is the first mechanized direct impossibility result for named termination-measure classes on a fixed terminating system. All internal proofs are formalized in Lean~4. The boundary is explanatory, not only negative: we prove an escape trichotomy for the explicit direct universe, a transparency-essentiality theorem with a concrete witness, a dependency-pair escape characterization, a generalized polynomial boundary theorem isolating failure of frozen base dominance, computable barrier-witness extractors, ablations, and SCC synchronization theorems, showing that successful methods cross the boundary only by importing structure outside the formalized direct classes. For the concrete witness calculus KO7, the guarded fragment is certified for strong normalization, confluence, a certified normalizer, decidable reachability to safe normal-form targets, an exact DM-component ordinal calibration at $ω^ω$, and a triple-lex certificate image below $ω^ω\cdot 2$. For full unguarded KO7, we prove root termination by a nonlinear polynomial witness and a KO7-specialized MPO, lift the nonlinear witness to context-closed strong normalization with an explicit derivation-length bound, expose executable classifier/witness/oracle tooling for direct-orientation attempts, and connect the Lean development to TTT2/CeTA through a checked TPDB export and verifier bridge.2025-11-26T00:50:17Z42 pages. The Lean 4 formalization (~15,000 LOC) and certified TTT2/CeTA artifacts are available at https://github.com/MosesRahnama/OperatorKO7Moses Rahnamahttp://arxiv.org/abs/2504.07537v2Formalizing Representation Theorems for a Logical Framework with Rewriting2026-03-19T09:54:52ZRepresentation theorems for formal systems often take the form of an inductive translation that satisfies certain invariants, which are proved inductively. Theory morphisms and logical relations are common patterns of such inductive constructions. They allow representing the translation and the proofs of the invariants as a set of translation rules, corresponding to the cases of the inductions. Importantly, establishing the invariants is reduced to checking a finite set of, typically decidable, statements. Therefore, in a framework supporting theory morphisms and logical relations, translations that fit one of these patterns become much easier to formalize and to verify. The lambdaPi-calculus modulo rewriting is a logical framework designed for representing and translating between formal systems that has previously not systematically supported such patterns. In this paper, we extend it with theory morphisms and logical relations. We apply these to define and verify invariants for a number of translations between formal systems. In doing so, we identify some best practices that enable us to obtain elegant novel formalizations of some challenging translations, in particular sort-erasure translations from sorted to unsorted languages.2025-04-10T08:02:40ZThomas TraversiéMICS, DEDUCTEAMFlorian RabeFAUhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2505.08916v2A New Tractable Description Logic under Categorical Semantics2026-03-19T08:59:09ZBiomedical ontologies contain numerous concept or role names involving negative knowledge such as lacks_part, absence_of. Such a representation with labels rather than logical constructors would not allow a reasoner to interpret lacks_part as a kind of negation of has_part. It is known that adding negation to the tractable Description Logic (DL) EL allowing for conjunction, existential restriction and concept inclusion makes it intractable since the obtained logic includes implicitly disjunction and universal restriction which interact with other constructors. In this paper, we propose a new extension of EL with a weakened negation allowing to represent negative knowledge while retaining tractability. To this end, we introduce categorical semantics of all logical constructors of the DL SH including EL with disjunction, negation, universal restriction, role inclusion and transitive roles. The categorical semantics of a logical constructor is usually described as a set of categorical properties referring to several objects without using set membership. To restore tractability, we have to weaken semantics of disjunction and universal restriction by identifying \emph{independent} categorical properties that are responsible for intractability, and dropping them from the set of categorical properties. We show that the logic resulting from weakening semantics is more expressive than EL with the bottom concept, transitive roles and role inclusion.2025-05-13T19:25:21ZChan Le DucLudovic Brieullehttp://arxiv.org/abs/2603.08033v2The Unit Gap: How Sharing Works in Boolean Circuits2026-03-19T07:04:57ZWe study the gap between the minimum size of a Boolean circuit (DAG) and the minimum size of a formula (tree circuit) over the And-Inverter Graph (AIG) basis {AND, NOT} with free inversions. We prove that this gap is always 0 or 1 (Unit Gap Theorem), that sharing requires opt(f) >= n essential variables (Threshold Theorem), and that no sharing is needed when opt(f) <= 3 (Tree Theorem). Gate counts in optimal circuits satisfy an exact decomposition formula with a binary sharing term. When the gap equals 1, it arises from exactly one gate with fan-out 2, employing either dual-polarity or same-polarity reuse; we prove that no other sharing structure can produce a unit gap.2026-03-09T07:12:48Z13 pages, 2 figures, 7 tables. Code and data: https://github.com/krinkin/unit-gapKirill Krinkinhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2603.08762v3Formally Verifying Quantum Phase Estimation Circuits with 1,000+ Qubits2026-03-19T03:18:29ZWe present a scalable formal verification methodology for Quantum Phase Estimation (QPE) circuits. Our approach uses a symbolic qubit abstraction based on quantifier-free bit-vector logic, capturing key quantum phenomena, including superposition, rotation, and measurement. The proposed methodology maps quantum circuit functional behaviour from Hilbert space to a bit-vector domain. We develop formal properties aligned with this abstraction to ensure functional correctness of QPE circuits. The method scales efficiently, verifying QPE circuits with up to 6 precision qubits and 1,024 phase qubits using under 7.5~GB of memory.2026-03-09T01:59:07ZThe work is accepted for presentation as a full research paper in IEEE-DCAS 2026 and the final version will be available via IEEE Xplore after the conferenceArun GovindankuttySudarshan K. Srinivasanhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2507.00465v2Encoding Peano Arithmetic in a Minimal Fragment of Separation Logic2026-03-19T02:52:44ZSeparation logic is successful for software verification of heap-manipulating programs. Numbers are necessary to be added to separation logic for verification of practical software where numbers are important. However, properties of the validity such as decidability and complexity for separation logic with numbers have not been fully studied yet. This paper presents the translation of Pi-0-1 formulas in Peano arithmetic to formulas in a small fragment of separation logic with numbers, which consists only of the intuitionistic points-to predicate, 0 and the successor function. Then this paper proves that a formula in Peano arithmetic is valid in the standard model if and only if its translation in this fragment is valid in the standard interpretation. As a corollary, this paper also gives a perspective proof for the undecidability of the validity in this fragment. Since Pi-0-1 formulas can describe consistency of logical systems and non-termination of computations, this result also shows that these properties discussed in Peano arithmetic can also be discussed in such a small fragment of separation logic with numbers.2025-07-01T06:26:14ZSohei ItoMakoto Tatsutahttp://arxiv.org/abs/2404.16050v5Implications of computer science theory for the simulation hypothesis2026-03-19T01:13:28ZThe simulation hypothesis has recently excited renewed interest in the physics and philosophy communities. However, the hypothesis specifically concerns {\textit{computers}} that simulate physical universes. So to formally investigate the hypothesis, we need to understand it in terms of computer science (CS) theory. In addition we need a formal way to couple CS theory with physics. Here I couple those fields by using the physical Church-Turing thesis. This allow me to exploit Kleene's second recursion, to prove that not only is it possible for {us} to be a simulation being run on a computer, but that we might be in a simulation being run a computer \emph{by us}. In such a ``self-simulation'', there would be two identical instances of us, both equally ``real''. I then use Rice's theorem to derive impossibility results concerning simulation and self-simulation; derive implications for (self-)simulation if we are being simulated in a program using fully homomorphic encryption; and briefly investigate the graphical structure of universes simulating other universes which contain computers running their own simulations. I end by describing some of the possible avenues for future research. While motivated in terms of the simulation hypothesis, the results in this paper are direct consequences of the Church-Turing thesis. So they apply far more broadly than the simulation hypothesis.2024-04-09T18:39:46Z47 pages of text, 5 pages of references, 13 pages of appendicesDavid H. Wolperthttp://arxiv.org/abs/2603.18368v1Decidability of Quantum Modal Logic2026-03-19T00:04:54ZThe decidability of a logical system refers to the existence of an algorithm that can determine whether any given formula in that system is a theorem. In this paper, Harrop's lemma is used to prove the decidability of quantum modal logic.2026-03-19T00:04:54ZLogic Journal of the IGPL, Volume 33, Issue 3, June 2025, jzaf010Kenji Tokuo10.1093/jigpal/jzaf010http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.18321v1A Simple Categorical Calculus of Interacting Processes2026-03-18T22:06:08ZWe present a calculus that models a simple sort of process interaction. Our calculus consists of a collection of terms together with a rewrite relation, parameterised by an arbitrary multicategory whose morphisms we understand as non-interactive processes. We show that our calculus is confluent and terminating, and that terms modulo the induced convertibility relation form a virtual double category. We relate our calculus to the free cornering of a monoidal category, which is a double-categorical model of process interaction that is similar in spirit to the calculus presented herein. Precisely, we construct a functor from the virtual double category given by our calculus into the underlying virtual double category of the free cornering of the free monoidal category on the multicategory of non-interacting processes. If we think of the terms of our calculus as programs and the rewriting system as an operational semantics for these programs, this functor gives a sound denotational semantics for our calculus in terms of the free cornering.2026-03-18T22:06:08ZIn peer reviewChad NesterNiels Voorneveldhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2603.15379v3Revisiting the expressiveness of metric temporal logic : A tale of "Je t'aime, moi non plus."2026-03-18T19:22:05ZThe expressiveness of Metric Temporal Logic (MTL) has been extensively studied throughout the last two decades. In particular, it has been shown that the \emph{interval-based} semantics of MTL is strictly more expressive than the \emph{pointwise} one. These results may suggest that enabling the evaluation of formulae at arbitrary time points \emph{instead of} positions of timed events increases the expressive power of MTL. In this paper, we formally argue otherwise. We demonstrate that under standard models of finite or non-Zeno infinite (action-based) timed executions, the interval-based and the pointwise semantics are incomparable, and therefore disprove a twenty-year-old result. We then propose a new \emph{mixed} semantics that embeds both the pointwise and the interval-based ones.2026-03-16T14:54:10ZMohammed Aristide Foughalihttp://arxiv.org/abs/2505.06193v4Ohana trees, linear approximation and multi-types for the $λ$I-calculus: No variable gets left behind or forgotten!2026-03-18T17:08:35ZAlthough the $λ$I-calculus is a natural fragment of the $λ$-calculus, obtained by forbidding the erasure of arguments, its equational theories did not receive much attention. The reason is that all proper denotational models studied in the literature equate all non-normalizable $λ$I-terms, whence the associated theory is not very informative. The goal of this paper is to introduce a previously unknown theory of the $λ$I-calculus, induced by a notion of evaluation trees that we call "Ohana trees". The Ohana tree of a $λ$I-term is an annotated version of its Böhm tree, remembering all free variables that are hidden within its meaningless subtrees, or pushed into infinity along its infinite branches.
We develop the associated theories of program approximation: the first approach -- more classic -- is based on finite trees and continuity, the second adapts Ehrhard and Regnier's Taylor expansion. We then prove a Commutation Theorem stating that the normal form of the Taylor expansion of a $λ$I-term coincides with the Taylor expansion of its Ohana tree. As a corollary, we obtain that the equality induced by Ohana trees is compatible with abstraction and application.
Subsequently, we introduce a denotational model designed to capture the equality induced by Ohana trees. Although presented as a non-idempotent type system, our model is based on a suitably modified version of the relational semantics of the $λ$-calculus, which is known to yield proper models of the $λ$I-calculus when restricted to non-empty finite multisets. To track variables occurring in subterms that are hidden or pushed to infinity in the evaluation trees, we generalize the system in two ways: first, we reintroduce annotated versions of the empty multiset indexed by sets of variables; second, (...)2025-05-09T17:13:18ZThis is the (submitted) long version of the (published) conference version v2, see https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2025.12Rémy CerdaGiulio ManzonettoAlexis Saurinhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2603.17909v1In Perfect Harmony: Orchestrating Causality in Actor-Based Systems2026-03-18T16:47:25ZRuntime verification has gained popularity as a lightweight approach for increasing assurance in systems under scrutiny. Performing runtime checks enables dynamic monitoring and alerts for unexpected behavior, thereby improving reliability and correctness. Actor-based systems present significant challenges for runtime verification. Properties frequently span multiple actors with complex causal dependencies, while nondeterministic message interleavings can obscure execution semantics. Moreover, most existing monitoring tools are designed for single-process behavior. This paper presents ACTORCHESTRA, a runtime verification framework for Erlang that automatically tracks causality across multi-actor interactions. The framework instruments Erlang systems that comply with OTP guidelines via targeted code injection. This method establishes the orchestration infrastructure required to track causal relationships between actors without requiring manual modifications to the target system. To ease the specification of multi-actor properties, the framework provides WALTZ, a specification language that automatically compiles properties into executable Erlang monitors that integrate with the instrumented system. Three case studies demonstrate ACTORCHESTRA's effectiveness in detecting complex behavioral violations in real-world actor systems. A performance evaluation quantifies the runtime overhead of the monitoring infrastructure and analyzes the trade-offs between added safety guarantees and execution costs.2026-03-18T16:47:25ZAccepted at the 19th IEEE International Conference on Software Testing, Verification and Validation (ICST 2026)Vladyslav MikytivBernardo ToninhoCarla Ferreirahttp://arxiv.org/abs/2508.00633v2Dynamics and Coherence for the Free Cornering with Protocol Choice2026-03-18T09:37:40ZWe present a term rewriting system that models the dynamic aspects of the free cornering with protocol choice of a monoidal category, which has been proposed as a categorical model of process interaction. This term rewriting system is confluent and terminating in an appropriate sense. We use this machinery to prove a coherence theorem for the free cornering with protocol choice.2025-08-01T13:45:24ZWe have realised that the term rewriting system this paper concerns is not, in fact, confluent modulo equations. That is, proposition 16 (part 2) does not hold. This invalidates most of the development of the paper. We believe the problem to be unfixable, and have abandoned this particular line of workChad NesterNiels Voorneveldhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2404.19503v3Kuroda's Translation for Higher-Order Logic2026-03-18T08:47:24ZKuroda's translation embeds first-order classical logic into intuitionistic logic, such that a formula and its translation are equivalent in classical logic. Recently, Brown and Rizkallah extended this translation to higher-order logic. However, they showed that the translation fails in the presence of functional extensionality, and they did not prove the classical equivalence between a formula and its translation. In this paper, we emphasize different conditions under which Kuroda's translation works in the presence of functional extensionality, including the double-negation shift. We show that the classical equivalence between a formula and its translation does not necessarily hold in higher-order logic. However, it is sufficient to assume both functional extensionality and propositional extensionality.2024-04-30T12:40:05ZThomas TraversiéMICS, DEDUCTEAM