https://arxiv.org/api/e6j7LaR/nnI3tb5UAJ8ltovr6Z8 2026-09-11T21:00:50Z 27079 60 15 http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.24233v3 2026-09-07T16:41:49Z

A user faces a list returned by a search system, ordered by a noisy proxy for relevance, and decides whether to pay a fixed cost to inspect another item or stop with the best she has uncovered. She does not enter the page knowing how good its items are, so each inspection both produces a candidate item and refines her belief about the page's underlying quality. We show that the optimal policy is a standout rule: the user stops once her best find is sufficiently good relative to what she expects from the page, with the required margin changing with depth. The resulting dynamics collapse to a one-dimensional Markov chain, which yields the full distribution of inspection depth through a closed-form recursion. The model uncovers three hidden mechanisms that explain why users stop: trust, commit, and cut-losses. It also yields a rich set of testable implications. The same Bayesian-rational view turns inspection depth into a learning-to-rank likelihood: an observed depth restricts the latent relevance path to a polyhedron of survival inequalities, while a conversion further identifies the terminal winner. Simulations show that the resulting estimator recovers relevance under correct specification and improves ranking when restricted to the features available to the incumbent ranker. Applied to public Baidu search logs, the inspection depth likelihood produces rankings that align more closely with expert relevance judgments than click-trained alternatives.

2026-05-22T21:22:08Z Shichao Ma http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.07673v1 2026-09-07T16:01:32Z

Citation-based measures of scientific influence typically treat citations as uniform signals, ignoring the different roles that cited works play in a paper's contribution. We introduce contribution-based credit scoring for research articles: a structured citation analysis that decomposes a paper's credit between its own original contribution and the prior work it builds on. Motivated by a cooperative-game view of scientific credit, we propose the contribution tree, a hierarchical framework that conserves importance across the document structure and separates original from citation-derived contribution. To make this framework scalable, we use LLMs as noisy comparative estimators of local importance. We further extend the model to article collections by propagating contributions through weighted citation graphs, yielding corpus-level contributions and normalized influence scores. Our experiments suggest that our framework captures contribution signals beyond surface-level heuristics. Our code is available at https://github.com/sanaebrahimi/Importance_Scoring/

2026-09-07T16:01:32Z Sana Ebrahimi Suraj Shetiya Abolfazl Asudeh http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.07663v1 2026-09-07T15:49:16Z

A wrong number is worse than no answer. Across factuality-critical domains -- audience metrics, scheduling and rights in media; dosages and lab values in healthcare; figures and citations in finance and legal -- a confident but fabricated value is more damaging than an honest admission of uncertainty. Yet this is the dominant failure mode we observe on small local language models: even when correct evidence is present in context, models fabricate plausible numbers and timestamps. Recent work characterizes a real limit of this regime: below 7B parameters, the bottleneck of retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) is not retrieval quality but context utilization. We present Noesis, the deterministic-first query plane of the Noesis architecture, which makes every deterministic judgment before generation. Its mechanisms follow from the ingestion architecture (subject of a separate patent application): (a) a producer-side fact layer rendering precomputed metric facts verbatim without ranking; (b) positional addressing with deterministic cross-source alignment, resolved ahead of query time at zero LLM cost; (c) provenance scoping as an attribution constraint with multi-tier named-reference routing; and (d) two-tier context with model-triggered verbatim hydration. Across four ablations, a 2B model reaches parity with a 35B model on factual integrity (exact values in all runs; zero confabulated numbers on absent-entity traps); structured retrieval beats flat RAG by +11.4 points at 2B; skeleton-only context preserves quantitative answers at 20-30% smaller prompts; and hydration recovers verbatim narrative in ~8s versus ~29s. Two properties matter for regulated domains: each query resolves in a single generation call, and every reported value is traceable to its exact source and position by construction.

2026-09-07T15:49:16Z Patent pending: Application No. 102026000023146; IT202500035167. Companion to arXiv:2608.15919 Nicola Cogotti http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.07629v1 2026-09-07T15:27:58Z

Democratizing access to the knowledge held in large corpora of tables such as data lakes is emerging as a central research challenge. Research in this space is advancing and broadening in scope, increasingly supplying the components to satisfy a person's insight need end-to-end. Yet these efforts remain fragmented across communities that frame the problem under their own conventions, such as table question answering, text-to-SQL, and data analysis agents, with works six times as likely to cite within the same task label as across labels. To bring these communities onto common ground, we establish a holistic framework for this pursuit, which we refer to as Open Tabular Insight Extraction (OpenTI). We formalize OpenTI from first principles around the analytical knowledge a person needs, the procedure for deriving it from a corpus of tables, and how well a result serves the person who sought it. In doing so we consolidate frameworks and terminology across information retrieval, natural language processing, machine learning, databases, and human-computer interaction, and apply this grounding in a systematic review and analysis of systems and benchmarks that work towards OpenTI. We find that current systems do not cover the end-to-end scope of OpenTI, mainly focusing on the analysis itself, and that benchmarks are largely unfit for evaluations in an open setting as inputs presuppose knowledge of tables, and validation mechanisms do not match the setup. Finally, we distill a research agenda towards OpenTI systems, evaluation, and interaction paradigms that surface the insights users need. An interactive companion to our paper is available at https://open-tabular-insight-extraction.github.io.

2026-09-07T15:27:58Z Daniel Gomm Maarten de Rijke Madelon Hulsebos http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.07595v1 2026-09-07T15:06:22Z

The same underlying computational problem is solved across unrelated fields under different names: recursive Bayesian state estimation appears as a "Kalman filter" in control, "Bayesian forecasting" in pharmacokinetics, and "data assimilation" in geoscience. Topical and citation-based scientific embeddings cannot see this shared problem. We distill each paper once into a domain- and method-name-stripped faceted computational fingerprint, a free-text mechanism skeleton plus controlled computational facets. We define a tunable, facet-selectable distance over it. The goal is solution import: surface cross-field pairs solving the same problem, so a bespoke implementation can be swapped for another field's standard, specialized solver. On a benchmark of 18 method families across 109 papers, the skeleton lifts cross-domain retrieval average precision over the abstract from 0.222 to 0.513, and the whole fingerprint reaches 0.557. Strikingly, four trained scientific embedders all fall below plain abstract+TF-IDF: they encode topical and citation similarity, the wrong signal for this task. The gain is the representation: the abstract-to-skeleton swap lifts every embedder, and the pipeline is one cached LLM call per paper plus a cheap embedder. An interventional re-skin / math-edit test shows the fingerprint tracks the computation, not the field. On a 501-paper wild corpus, known twins dominate the top of the ranking (23 of the top 30); with planted pairs excluded from the results, three blind LLM judges rate 3 of the top 5 and 8 of the top 30 pairs genuine import candidates, and 0 of 30 random ones. The human verification is the four executed imports: in one, an open standard solver reproduces a bespoke clinical dosing engine's output. We release the benchmark, the code, and the distillation prompt.

2026-09-07T15:06:22Z Accepted as a full paper at JCDL 2026 (The 2026 ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries), Frisco, TX, October 13-16, 2026. 10 pages plus references, 2 figures, 8 tables. Code and benchmark: https://github.com/ErykKul/same-problem-different-field ; archived dataset (KU Leuven RDR): https://doi.org/10.48804/W3B9WC Eryk Kulikowski http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.07561v1 2026-09-07T14:41:46Z

Late-interaction models such as ColBERT achieve strong effectiveness by representing each document with many token-level vectors, but this expressivity leads to large indexing cost, storage footprints and expensive MaxSim scoring. We show that late-interaction representations exhibit an intrinsic low-rank structure: document token embeddings concentrate in a low-dimensional subspace that preserves most of the retrieval signal. Leveraging this observation, we introduce EigenLI, a spectral approximation framework that compresses late-interaction representations via document-specific low-dimensional subspaces. Unlike clustering or pooling methods, EigenLI identifies the dominant eigendirections of each document and uses them to construct reduced interaction representations. Empirically, $k$-EigenLI with $k \le 32$ outperforms k-means and Ward clustering based pooling methods on ColBERTv2 and AnswerAI-ColBERT-small; GTE-ModernColBERT exhibits a different tradeoff at $k=32$, where clustering methods perform better. The same spectral construction also yields EigenLI-SV, an ANN-compatible single-vector representation derived from the second-order summary of the reduced structure. Across multiple datasets and all three text models, EigenLI-SV consistently outperforms comparable single-vector surrogates such as MUVERA.

2026-09-07T14:41:46Z Archish S Sabyasachi Basu Ankit Garg Ravishankar Krishnaswamy Kirankumar Shiragur http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.12226v6 2026-09-07T13:56:17Z

Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) pose new challenges for ontology matching (OM). While OM systems built on LLMs have shown remarkable capabilities in discovering more matching candidates, traditional OM validation that relies on domain experts has become overwhelming. Although crowdsourcing can expose OM validation to large online communities, bias and errors from diverse annotators can reduce the quality of crowdsourcing for OM validation. In this study, we explore the use of crowdsourcing for OM validation and introduce a novel quality assurance crowdsourcing system called Crowd-OM. In order to ensure the quality of crowdsourcing for OM validation, we propose three domain-specific mechanisms, namely differential trustworthiness, coherence pre-filling, and time-dependent modelling. Crowd-OM can be integrated with existing OM systems to enable human-in-the-loop validation. The evaluation shows its effectiveness in handling various annotators and different annotation scenarios. We discuss two real-world use cases and current limitations for improvement.

2026-05-12T15:02:34Z 6 pages, 7 figures Zhangcheng Qiang Weiqing Wang Kerry Taylor http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.25489v3 2026-09-07T13:48:50Z

Graph retrieval-augmented generation places retrieved subgraphs into the model's context window at query time, paying a recurring token cost and exposing source data on every call. We study an alternative: compiling a knowledge graph offline into a bank of LoRA adapters, one per entity, that serve as a parametric knowledge layer queried by injecting weights rather than text, at zero query-time context cost. On the MetaQA dataset, we find that subgraph-trained adapters encode context-free factual knowledge that generalizes to unseen questions: on single-valued relations the adapter gains $+0.243$ exact-match score over a base model that is nearly blind closed-book ($0.007$), and only the correct adapter recovers this knowledge (an oracle gap of $+0.283$ over the base model). However, the stored knowledge is not recoverable by similarity: given a query with no subgraph, embedding-based and weight-space geometry retrieval both perform at chance, because a semantically neighbouring entity's adapter does not contain the answer - knowledge is stored locally and does not transfer. Weight geometry correlates with subgraph semantics ($ρ= +0.329$) but not with functional retrievability. We quantify the byte and context-token costs against graph retrieval-augmented generation and discuss deployment implications. Our results establish that parametric knowledge graph memory is feasible for storing knowledge, and identify selecting and composing the right adapters by a mechanism other than semantic similarity as the central open problem - motivating a learned, query-conditioned composition mechanism.

2026-08-26T08:02:00Z 12 pages, 2 figures, 7 tables, accepted at SKGi 2026; v2: editorial corrections only, v3: bibliography fix Martino M. L. Pulici Cuong Xuan Chu Evgeny Kharlamov Volker Tresp http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.07395v1 2026-09-07T12:06:49Z

Large language models (LLMs) are no longer deployed only for single-turn conversation but increasingly act as agents that plan, call tools, retrieve evidence, maintain memory, and interact over long horizons, often together with other agents through multi-turn conversations. Therefore, knowing when to trust the agentic system is a prerequisite for safe deployment. However, existing work on quantifying uncertainty for LLMs was built almost entirely for single-turn question answering. This paper argues that errors and uncertainty arise from multi-turn conversations, environments, and tools rather than from a single-turn question answering setting. It comes late, however, and is compounded in a single score that is too coarse to represent the unreliability. We organize the literature with a three-axis taxonomy, (1) what the uncertainty is, (2) how it is estimated, and (3) where uncertainty arises during an agent pipeline. We investigate step-level and trajectory-level calibration and show with a simple counterexample that the first does not imply the second. Experiments on real agent traces across four models and up to a 50-step budget show that the proposed metric and reporting protocol (Trajectory-Checkpoint Expected Calibration Error, TC-ECE) can be computed and that step errors are coupled along a trajectory. We find that confidence estimates from the agent's own responses do not consistently outperform a simple baseline. The experiments also show that averaging all trajectories together can hide overconfidence at later stages, which becomes visible when results are analyzed across different horizons. In simpler terms, this paper identifies where the uncertainty comes from in the agentic system pipeline, how to teach agents to know when they are wrong, and why one confidence number is not enough.

2026-09-07T12:06:49Z Moule Lin Qizhen Lan Shuhao Guan Weipeng Jing Jiexin Fan David Gregg Goetz Botterweck http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.19961v3 2026-09-07T09:57:01Z

With the rapid proliferation of multimodal information, Visual Document Retrieval (VDR) has emerged as a critical frontier in bridging the gap between unstructured visually rich data and precise information acquisition. Unlike traditional natural image retrieval, visual documents exhibit unique characteristics defined by dense textual content, intricate layouts, and fine-grained semantic dependencies. This paper surveys the VDR landscape as a retrieval problem in its own right, rather than as the front end of a generation pipeline, and does so specifically through the lens of the Multimodal Large Language Model (MLLM) era. We begin by examining the benchmark landscape, including the recent turn toward reasoning-intensive evaluation, and then dive into the methodological evolution along two orthogonal axes: what a retriever is, spanning multimodal embedding models and reranker models, and how it is deployed, from single-stage retrieval through Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) to Agentic systems. Cutting across both, we analyse the representation--efficiency trade-off that late interaction imposes. We ground these categories in leaderboard evidence on where the empirical frontier actually lies, and close by identifying persistent challenges and outlining promising future directions for multimodal document intelligence.

2026-02-23T15:27:41Z Under review. This version updates the relevant works released before 25 August, 2026 Yibo Yan Jiahao Huo Guanbo Feng Mingdong Ou Yi Cao Xin Zou Shuliang Liu Yuanhuiyi Lyu Yu Huang Jungang Li Kening Zheng Xu Zheng Philip S. Yu James Kwok Xuming Hu http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.08828v3 2026-09-07T09:55:13Z

As the volume of scientific publications grows exponentially, researchers increasingly face difficulties in locating relevant literature. Research Paper Recommender Systems have become vital tools to mitigate this information overload by delivering personalized suggestions. This survey provides a comprehensive analysis of Research Paper Recommender Systems developed between November 2021 and December 2024, building upon prior reviews in the field. It presents an extensive overview of the techniques and approaches employed, the datasets utilized, the evaluation metrics and procedures applied, and the status of both enduring and emerging challenges observed during the research. Unlike prior surveys, this survey goes beyond merely cataloguing techniques and models, providing a thorough examination of how these methods are implemented across different stages of the recommendation process. By furnishing a detailed and structured reference, this work aims to function as a consultative resource for the research community, supporting informed decision-making and guiding future investigations in the advances of effective Research Paper Recommender Systems.

2025-08-12T10:36:41Z Iratxe Pinedo Mikel Larrañaga Ana Arruarte http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.07276v1 2026-09-07T09:38:28Z

Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) depends on dense retrieval: each document is stored as a learned vector, and a query is answered by finding its nearest neighbors in that vector space. Keeping one full-precision vector per document is the dominant index cost at corpus scale, so retrieval systems replace each vector with a short code of a few bytes---a step called quantization. Standard quantizers such as product quantization (PQ) pick the code that reconstructs the original vector most closely. A single code is even more useful if it serves several byte budgets at once: when its short prefixes are each directly searchable, a deployment can set its efficiency--quality operating point without re-encoding the corpus. But training all prefixes under one objective makes the early bits a compromise across budgets---short codes improve while the full-width code degrades. Quantization to low-bit representation, such as binary codes, further sharpens the conflict. We introduce Matryoshka Hash Representations (MHR), a two-stage procedure that separates full-width training from prefix organization. MHR first learns a longer binary code, then freezes the model and trains additional zero-initialized residual code adaptors for directly searchable prefixes. Documents are stored at one bit per coordinate, while queries keep continuous logits like PQ to attain sufficient expressivity. We implement the search process with FAISS FastScan. Trained on MS MARCO and zero-shot transferred to seven BEIR datasets, MHR reaches .5561 NDCG@10 and .6535 Recall@100 at 32 bytes, surpassing the best baseline of the same budget. The advantage is more pronounced in lower budgets. The same code also strengthens two common pipelines: shortlisting candidates for full-precision reranking, and pruning a low-storage graph index such as LEANN.

2026-09-07T09:38:28Z 10 pages, 2 figures, 6 tables Peichun Hua Yunming Xiao http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.07273v1 2026-09-07T09:36:57Z

Industrial ranking models for recommendation have scaled feature interaction and sequence modeling separately; recent architectures such as HyFormer and MixFormer unify both in a stackable backbone. Real-world recommender systems, however, nearly always require multi-task learning, yet existing unified architectures confine multi-task modeling to shallow post-backbone towers, leaving the backbone without task-aware information flow. We propose MORE (Multi-task cO-evolving Ranking modEl), which embeds multi-task information flow inside the backbone, enabling task-specific signals to co-evolve with sequence and feature representations at every layer rather than in a post-hoc fusion. It introduces Anchor Tokens that persist across backbone layers: Shared Anchors encode cross-task commonalities, while Private Anchors capture task-specific priors. In each block, Anchor Tokens (1) read task-conditioned signals from behavior sequences, (2) mix with non-sequential features under a task-boundary mask, and (3) refine per-task representations through independent branches; as blocks stack, each task obtains a differentiated representation refined through all backbone layers. Experiments on large-scale industrial datasets show that MORE consistently outperforms baselines across all tasks under comparable parameter and FLOPs budgets, and scales well with model size. Online A/B tests on Momo, a leading Chinese social discovery platform with tens of millions of monthly active users, yield 3% improvement in usage duration, 3.6% in interaction rate, and 2% in deep-chat rate. MORE is deployed in production with request-level shared computation reducing scoring latency by about 30%.

2026-09-07T09:36:57Z Accepted at CIKM 2026 Yuchen Wang Feng Niu Qing Tan Junting Lu Baoxin Wu Jun Gao 10.1145/3799682.3840113 http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.07262v1 2026-09-07T09:18:03Z

Late-interaction visual document retrievers preserve fine-grained page evidence by storing many token embeddings per page, but the resulting storage and query-time interaction costs make large-scale deployment expensive. Pooling document tokens before indexing offers a natural remedy, yet static pooling must decide which visual evidence to preserve before the query is known. We study an alternative: a heavily compressed hot-path index generates candidates, after which query-aware token budgeting operates on the original token sets of the shortlisted pages. We formulate this stage-two selection as a budgeted MaxSim coverage problem, show that a clipped version is monotone submodular, and compare coverage-only, cluster-guided, token-wise, and marginal-gain policies. On ten ViDoRe tasks with ColModernVBERT, direct static pooling reduces macro normalized discounted cumulative gain at rank five from 0.6309 without compression to 0.4738 at a thirty-two-fold pool factor. Under the same candidate-generation regime and a pool-factor-eight-equivalent reranking budget, token top-k recovers 93.93 percent of the full-token score, while greedy marginal-gain selection recovers 98.39 percent. Held-out and leave-one-dataset-out evaluations yield positive greedy improvements over token top-k on every dataset. The latency analysis reveals two useful operating points: token top-k for interactive retrieval and the naive greedy implementation as a quality upper envelope. Together, these results show that late-interaction visual retrieval benefits from query-aware allocation rather than query-agnostic pooling alone.

2026-09-07T09:18:03Z Accepted at IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM) PS Rishi Rajeev Ranjan Dwivedi Vinod K Kurmi http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.30525v2 2026-09-07T09:16:21Z

Retrieval-augmented scientific synthesis aims to answer complex research questions by integrating information from multiple papers into comprehensive and well-grounded responses. Since the generator can only synthesize the information selected and organized by the reranker, the quality of the generated synthesis depends critically on the reranked results. However, most rerankers operate at the passage level, which leaves key methodological, empirical, and comparative information buried in long and flat contexts, weakening the grounding of generated claims. Moreover, existing rerankers mainly rely on independent query-candidate scoring which overlooks complementary, contextual, and contrasting relations across scientific candidates, limiting information coverage and the comprehensiveness of the resulting synthesis. To address these limitations, we propose LoG-Reranker, a local-to-global sentence-level graph reranking framework for scientific synthesis. LoG-Reranker performs role-aware local scoring to identify fine-grained, query-relevant sentences and then models their relations on a sentence graph across the candidate set to globally refine sentence rankings. Top-ranked sentences and their connected neighbors are organized into a structured input context for generator to produce more grounded and comprehensive synthesis. Extensive experiments on scientific synthesis and reranking benchmarks show that LoG-Reranker consistently outperforms competitive rerankers, yielding more reliable rankings and improving the quality of generated synthesis.

2026-08-31T09:56:10Z Zheng Dou Zhao Zhang Hao Geng Ningjing Wang Deqing Wang