https://arxiv.org/api/A88zKG6/789HcBVar3IyXkCfcIA 2026-06-14T20:56:27Z 30934 495 15 http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.22657v1 2026-05-21T15:58:59Z

Background and Context. Computer programming often involves extended periods of sustained activity and mobile phone notifications introduce frequent opportunities for interruption. Prior work demonstrates that suppressing phone notifications may reduce these disruptions. Objectives. Our primary research question is: How does suppressing phone notifications affect students' task engagement and productivity while programming? Method. We report on a replication and methodological extension study conducted in a CS1 course involving 22 students. Using a within-subject design, selected programming assignments were randomly designated for enabling notification suppression. Phone state logs were synchronized with millisecond-resolution IDE keystroke data to measure student attention and focus when in the control and notification-suppression conditions. Findings. Assignments completed with notification suppression enabled significantly lower break rates and longer intervals of focus compared to assignments completed in the control condition for many, but not all, students. This study provides evidence that notification suppression is associated with measurable differences in programming engagement and behavior. We also find a remarkable bimodality in the effect across students -- many students are positively affected, a small number are negatively affected, and very few experience little or no effect. This finding is consistent with other studies in diverse disciplines. Implications. Our results show that, for many students, phone notification suppression tools, such as Do Not Disturb, can improve attention and focus. Implications apply to educational settings (do-not-disturb as an intervention) and scholarship (understanding the effects of phone distraction).

2026-05-21T15:58:59Z Gavin Eddington Christopher Warren Seth Poulsen John Edwards http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.18141v2 2026-05-21T15:38:11Z

On-Policy Self-Distillation (OPSD) is a unified learning framework in which a single large language model acts simultaneously as both teacher and student. Unlike conventional knowledge distillation that relies on a separate, often larger teacher model, OPSD operates under different contextual roles: the teacher policy is granted privileged access to verified reasoning traces, while the student policy observes only the problem statement. OPSD is trained to minimize per-token distributional divergence between the two roles over trajectories sampled from the student itself, thereby aligning its own reasoning behavior with solution-aware rationalizations. OPSD eliminates the need for an external teacher, directly leverages ground-truth solution information, and resolves the distribution mismatch inherent in off-policy distillation. OPSD typically reduces GPU memory consumption by approximately 40%-60% compared to standard On-Policy Distillation (OPD). In this paper, we present a brief analysis of the conceptual foundations, methodological innovations, and principled designs underlying recent advances in OPSD for large language models. This discussion, crafted from the perspective of beginners in this field, aims to provide a concise overview of the design principles and emerging patterns of OPSD in LLMs, intended for researchers who are similarly new to this area.

2026-05-18T09:47:53Z Fangming Cui Sunan Li Jiahong Li http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.22627v1 2026-05-21T15:36:38Z

Digital Image Correlation (DIC) enables dense, time-resolved measurement of surface strain in deforming materials, providing insight into strain localization and failure mechanisms. However, the resulting strain fields are typically explored frame-by-frame through spatial visualizations, making global temporal patterns difficult to discern. We present a visual summarization approach that represents the evolution of high-strain regions as a single Sankey diagram constructed from superlevel sets of the von Mises equivalent strain field. By tracking connected components over time via spatial overlap, the diagram encodes the birth, persistence, merging, and disappearance of strain concentrations. Applied to four tensile test datasets with varying notch geometries, the approach compactly captures differences in deformation regimes and qualitative precursors to failure, complementing traditional spatial strain visualizations with a global temporal overview.

2026-05-21T15:36:38Z Victor Persson Christofer Boo Mohit Sharma Ingrid Hotz http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.02885v3 2026-05-21T15:00:18Z

Large Language Models (LLMs) have gained traction in educational settings, often framed as virtual tutors or teaching assistants. Following early skepticism and bans, many schools and universities have begun integrating these systems into curricula. Yet decisions about whether and how to deploy LLM-based tools are frequently made without systematic engagement with the full range of stakeholders they affect. In this paper, we argue that understanding stakeholder perceptions of LLM-based systems in the classroom is not a matter of measuring approval or acceptance, but of identifying whose concerns are surfaced, in which contexts, and with what implications for responsible design and governance. We introduce Contextualized Perceptions for the Adoption of LLMs in Education (Co-PALE), a stakeholder-first framework that connects educational context, responsible AI principles, and categories of perception to support more deliberate decision-making about the adoption of LLM-based tools. We ground Co-PALE through a targeted analysis of prior work to diagnose recurring gaps in how stakeholder perceptions are studied, and through contextually distinct educational scenarios that illustrate how the same technology raises different concerns for different stakeholders. We further examine how university faculty and K--12 parents make sense of the framework through focus groups, using their reflections to surface tensions and uncertainties. Co-PALE supports more systematic reasoning about whether, where, and for whom LLM-based tools should be deployed in education.

2025-02-02T16:50:08Z Caterina Fuligni Daniel Dominguez Figaredo Armanda Lewis Julia Stoyanovich http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.22521v1 2026-05-21T14:13:27Z

Humanity is at the forefront of yet another digital revolution, where the lines between real and virtual worlds are dissolving, reshaping how we perceive and interact with our surroundings. In this context, we introduce a transformative paradigm for immersive virtual experiences centered around whole-body kinetic interactions. Our approach redefines immersion through three distinct levels: audio-visual immersion, capturing sensory realism; physical immersion, delivering haptic feedback; and full-body immersion (FBI), where dynamic bodily interaction integrates seamlessly with virtual environments. At the core of this innovation lies a scalable, distributable platform based on modular robotic surface units inspired by the adaptive designs of nature. These units enable the rendering of immersive environments at any scale, from intimate personal experiences to expansive multi-user settings, dynamically adapting to interactions in real-time. The modular system distributes force, shape, and motion feedback throughout entire spaces, replicating the physical characteristics of the environment and enabling new depth of engagement through FBI. By combining scalability, adaptability, and dynamic physical engagement, this framework bridges the gap between real and virtual worlds. It offers an unprecedented level of immersion where users can engage their entire bodies in symbiotic interactions with the virtual space. This work not only advances immersive technology but also redefines how humans and virtual environments coexist, setting a foundation for a new era of human-environment synthesis.

2026-05-21T14:13:27Z This manuscript is under consideration for possible publication in the Nature. Copyright may be transferred to Nature if the manuscript is accepted for publication, without further notice Alihan Bakir Ekrem Yüksel Fabio Zuliani Neil Chennoufi Francesco Bruno Jamie Paik http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.22509v1 2026-05-21T13:58:36Z

Making high-stakes personal decisions involves cognitive, emotional, and intuitive processes, and individuals differ in how they allocate attention across these modes. Integration of these processes has shown to benefit decision making. Yet, most current decision-support systems focus primarily on supporting cognitive aspects, rather than adapting to the individual's thinking profile to support integration of different types of thoughts. In this study, we investigate an agent designed to encourage integration by adapting to the individual user's thought patterns. We explore its effects on participants' perceptions of the agent and their reflective behavior, in comparison with unaided pre-reflection and a baseline agent. In a between-subjects study (N = 128), our agent, which fostered broad and elaborated thinking, enabled more personalized reflective trajectories, elicited more integrative reflective language, and was perceived as providing stronger support for holistic reflection. In contrast, the baseline agent produced homogenized profiles dominated by cognitive language across participants.

2026-05-21T13:58:36Z Accepted at UMAP 2026 UMAP 2026: Proceedings of the 34th ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization Morita Tarvirdians Senthil Chandrasegaran Hayley Hung Catholijn M. Jonker Catharine Oertel 10.1145/3774935.3806176 http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.22461v1 2026-05-21T13:24:38Z

Automated Guided Vehicles (AGV) in factory automation are increasingly capable of moving autonomously in close proximity to human workers. While their physical safety is regulated by standards and directives, perceived safety and workers comfort in close-proximity interactions are being actively investigated in studies. There are three limitations in the prior art research to that end. Firstly, AGVs with larger payloads are understudied. Secondly, the test participants are usually students and not working professionals. Thirdly, while conducting in-person experiments with heavy machinery can be dangerous, the transfer of safety perception results from simulated experiments remains open. In this paper, we investigate industrial workers perceived safety in shared spaces with large AGVs in a real-world encounter and in virtual reality. We vary the passing distance and the shape of the collision avoidance maneuver, and evaluate perceived threat level using a handheld pressure-sensitive trigger interface and a post-experiment questionnaire. Additionally, we ask participants to set their own collision avoidance parameters based on their experience with the demonstrated trajectory profiles. In a within-subject study, we found that, while the threat levels are perceived overall slightly higher in VR, the passing distance of 1.5 to 2 meters is preferred among the demonstrated profiles, as well as in the self-defined trajectories.

2026-05-21T13:24:38Z IEEE ICRA 2026 Workshop Proceedings: 8th Long-term Human Motion Prediction Workshop (LHMP 2026) Ansgar Howey Tim Schreiter Andrey Rudenko Achim J. Lilienthal http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.10009v2 2026-05-21T13:15:29Z

Large Language Models (LLMs) are unable to reliably reason about specific physical systems. Attempts to imbue LLMs with knowledge of the necessary physics concepts have shown great promise, but explainability and validation remain open challenges. An emerging alternative is tooling, where LLMs can query physical simulators and use the resulting simulation traces as context for validation. This approach suffers from poor scalability since simulation traces contain large volumes of fine-grained numerical and semantic data. We show that translating simulation traces to a sparse representation of "high-level" structural patterns leads to more effective interpretation by LLMs. We propose an unsupervised learning scheme to perform this translation, or annotation, via program synthesis. Our learning results in a library of programs that act as pattern detectors which can translate simulation traces to sparse, annotated pattern sequences. The detected patterns may optionally be guided by human experts via string labels (rigid collision, stretching spring, etc.). We show, using a recent physics benchmark, that such annotated representations are more amenable to natural language reasoning about specific physical systems. The synthesized programs serve as transparent, explainable functions that map system states to a sparse and efficient annotation space. As an example application, we show how goals within physical systems that are specified in natural language may be converted to reward programs which are maximized to find solutions.

2026-02-10T17:31:39Z Sean Memery Kartic Subr http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.03501v3 2026-05-21T12:19:11Z

Experimental evidence confirms that AI tools raise worker productivity, but also that sustained use can erode the expertise on which those gains depend. We develop a dynamic model in which a decision-maker chooses AI usage intensity for a worker over time, trading immediate productivity against the erosion of worker skill. We decompose the tool's productivity effect into two channels, one independent of worker expertise and one that scales with it. The model produces three main results. First, even a decision-maker who fully anticipates skill erosion rationally adopts AI when front-loaded productivity gains outweigh long-run skill costs, producing steady-state loss: the worker ends up less productive than before adoption. Second, when managers are short-termist or worker skill has external value, the decision-maker's optimal policy turns steady-state loss into the augmentation trap, leaving the worker worse off than if AI had never been adopted. Third, when AI productivity depends less on worker expertise, workers can permanently diverge in skill: experienced workers realize their full potential while less experienced workers deskill to zero. Small differences in managerial incentives can determine which path a worker takes. The productivity decomposition classifies deployments into five regimes that separate beneficial adoption from harmful adoption and identifies which deployments are vulnerable to the trap.

2026-04-03T22:50:32Z Michael Caosun Sinan Aral http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.22379v1 2026-05-21T12:09:42Z

With the advancement of science and technology, the importance of emotion research has become increasingly evident. Electroencephalography (EEG)-based emotion recognition has emerged as an active research area in recent years, owing to its objectivity and high temporal resolution. However, most existing methods focus on optimizing encoder structures to enhance feature extraction capabilities, while paying relatively little attention to similarity calculation strategies, particularly overlooking the potential temporal misalignment of responses among different subjects. To address these shortcomings, this paper draws inspiration from the late interaction mechanism of ColBERT in natural language processing (NLP) and proposes a Temporal Asynchronous Alignment-based Contrastive Learning (TA2CL) framework. This method transforms the traditional global "hard alignment" similarity calculation approach into a fine-grained local matching mechanism, enabling the model to adaptively search for and align "locally highly correlated" segments between two EEG signals, thereby effectively mitigating the effects of inter-subject differences and temporal delays. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed method achieves strong performance across multiple public datasets. Specifically, on the FACED dataset, it achieves an accuracy of 64.5% for the nine-class classification task and 79.5% for the binary classification task, while on the SEED and SEED-V datasets, it achieves accuracies of 86.4% and 70.1%, respectively, validating the method's effectiveness and generalization capability.

2026-05-21T12:09:42Z 16 pages, 7 figures Ying Xie Yi Zheng Zehui Xiao Wenkai Lu Mengting Liu http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.18372v2 2026-05-21T08:18:02Z

Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used in educational settings as interactive tools for collaboration. However, their tendency toward sycophancy, aligning with user beliefs even when incorrect, raises concerns for learning and decision-making, especially for less knowledgeable users. This study investigates how sycophantic alignment emerges in authentic multi-turn human-AI interactions and whether interventions targeting increasing AI literacy and prompting competencies can mitigate its effects. In a controlled mixed-design experiment, 60 participants completed analytical survival ranking tasks by first generating individual rankings and then making final decisions after collaborating with an AI assistant, both before and after receiving either general or sycophancy-focused prompting training. Preliminary results show that LLMs are highly sensitive to user input: lower-quality initial responses lead to poorer AI advice, suggesting that the model mirrors or incorporates user reasoning rather than correcting it or offering better alternatives that are missing or less frequent in the conversation. Critically, the propagation of user errors into AI responses significantly reduced both the quality of AI feedback and final user task performance, revealing a form of contextual sycophantic dependence. While the intervention did not eliminate the propagation of contextual errors, it significantly improved AI advice by reducing the direct mirroring of incorrect user rankings. These findings suggest that prompting and AI literacy alone may be insufficient to ensure epistemically independent AI support, highlighting the need for system-level approaches that better promote critical engagement in human-AI collaboration.

2026-05-18T13:20:45Z SPRINGER AIED 2026: Accepted for LBR, poster presentation at the 27th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, 27 Jun - 3 Jul 2026, Seoul, Republic of Korea Cansu Koyuturk Sabrina Guidotti Dimitri Ognibene http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.22095v1 2026-05-21T07:34:49Z

The emergence of large language models (LLMs) has spurred economists to study how humans and LLMs behave in strategic settings. We organized a series of round-robin tournaments in the Colonel Blotto game. This game attracts game theorists' attention due to high-dimensional action space and the absence of pure strategy Nash equilibria. In the first tournament, more than 200 human participants competed against one another. In the second tournament, several popular LLMs were invited to submit strategies. In the third tournament, we matched the number of LLM strategies to the number submitted by humans. We find that humans more often employ better-calibrated intermediate-level allocation heuristics and outperform the simpler, more stereotyped strategies submitted by LLMs. Strategic sophistication is key to success if and only if the necessary level of reasoning depth is reached, while lower and higher levels of reasoning offer no clear advantage over the primitive strategies. Among humans, field of study weakly predicts success: participants with STEM backgrounds perform better in the first tournament. Surprisingly, humans almost do not adjust their strategies across tournaments with different sets of opponents. This result suggests that humans base their choices primarily on the game's rules rather than on the identity of their opponents, treating LLMs much like human competitors.

2026-05-21T07:34:49Z Dmitry Dagaev Egor Ivanov Petr Parshakov Alexey Savvateev Gleb Vasiliev http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.22091v1 2026-05-21T07:32:16Z

Mainstream film is one of the richest sources of cultural content that AI systems learn from. Yet we have few tools for measuring the gender values it encodes. We present a proof-of-concept framework that turns fictional film characters into surveyable LLM agents. Using 160 U.S. films (1990--2019), we build 734 character agents from script dialogue and scene descriptions, condense their personas via expert-style reflections, and simulate World Values Survey gender-attitude responses. Agents reproduce systematic gender differences without explicit demographic prompting, suggesting attitudes emerge from behavior rather than identity labels. Benchmarked against historical survey data, agents exaggerate gender gaps and show greater decade-to-decade volatility than real populations. Narrative sharpens rather than homogenizes gender contrasts, complicating the consistent-input assumption underlying cultivation theory's mainstreaming mechanism. AI systems trained on such corpora may inherit this stylization before any model-level amplification occurs.

2026-05-21T07:32:16Z Vivienne Bihe Chi Reyhan Jamalova Lyle Ungar Sharath Chandra Guntuku http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.00996v3 2026-05-21T05:03:19Z

Children today encounter social issues -- climate change, conflict, inequality -- through digital technologies, and the design of that encounter shapes whether young people move toward lasting civic engagement or toward anxiety and withdrawal. Much of the content children see is optimized for attention through fear and urgency, with few pathways toward meaningful action -- contributing to rising distress and disengagement among young people who care deeply but feel powerless to act. This full-day workshop introduces ``sustainable care'' as a design lens, asking how technology might support children's sustained engagement with social causes without contributing to empathic distress or burnout. We invite researchers and practitioners across child-computer interaction, games, education, and youth mental health to map this landscape together and develop a research agenda for the CCI community.

2026-03-01T08:50:30Z JaeWon Kim Aayushi Dangol Rotem Landesman Alexis Hiniker McKenna F. Parnes 10.1145/3773077.3816192 http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.21962v1 2026-05-21T03:48:31Z

Serious games are widely used for learning and training across domains such as healthcare, defense, and education. Persistent challenges remain, however, including static scenario design, authoring bottlenecks, limited learner modeling, and difficulty implementing meaningful real-time instructional adaptation. Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) introduce novel capabilities such as dynamic scenario variation, contextual feedback, adaptive pacing, and learner-state modeling that may help address some of these limitations. At the same time, integrating AI into serious games raises important questions related to validity, transparency, system control, and learner trust. This chapter examines how contemporary AI approaches may support real-time instructional adaptation in serious games. It distinguishes between instructional intelligence, defined as a system's capacity to infer learner knowledge and reason about pedagogically appropriate responses, and adaptivity, defined as the ability to modify instructional actions during interaction. A historical synthesis of adaptive learning systems is presented, tracing developments from early computer-assisted instruction through intelligent tutoring systems (ITS), dynamic difficulty adjustment (DDA), authoring platforms, learning analytics, and recent AI-enabled architectures. Building on this perspective, the chapter discusses how large language models (LLMs), reinforcement learning (RL), and agent-based architectures may contribute to more integrated forms of intelligence and adaptivity in serious games. It also highlights practical and research challenges associated with AI-enabled systems, including explainability, validation, computational cost, and the limited empirical evidence regarding long-term learning outcomes in AI-enabled serious games.

2026-05-21T03:48:31Z Book chapter, 1 figure. To appear in "Advances in Global Applied Artificial Intelligence," G. A. Tsihrintzis, M. Virvou, N. G. Bourbakis, and L. C. Jain (Eds.), Springer, Learning and Analytics in Intelligent Systems book series, 2026 Priyamvada Tripathi Bill Kapralos