https://arxiv.org/api/SKrydTroBW+KQqlrvZR9hUaGoyE 2026-06-14T19:56:14Z 30934 480 15 http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.23085v1 2026-05-21T22:36:02Z

Reminder systems commonly rely on fixed schedules, location triggers, or simple rules, limiting their ability to leverage the rich sensing capabilities of modern smart homes. A key challenge lies in enabling users to specify context-aware reminders without requiring complex configurations. We present a system pipeline that supports reminder authoring through natural language and conversational interaction. The pipeline translates user requests into structured representations and executable logic, incorporating time-based, activity-based, sensor-based, and state-based conditions. We conducted two studies to examine how users express reminder intent and how conversational support influences the authoring process. In Study 1 (N=40), we analyzed 233 user-authored reminders and identified challenges in expressing reminders with diverse and complex logic. Based on these findings, we refined the system and evaluated it in Study 2 (N=10), demonstrating improved handling of time-based, activity-based, sensor-based, and state-based conditions. Our results highlight the diversity and ambiguity of user expressions and show that conversational guidance can help structure these expressions into flexible, context-aware reminders.

2026-05-21T22:36:02Z Reina Szeyi Chan Sujendra Jayant Gharat Maya Lampi Yueran Jia Avi K Srinivasan Xiang Zhi Tan http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.23048v1 2026-05-21T21:27:10Z

Bayesian Knowledge Tracing (BKT) is a widely used and interpretable student modeling approach in intelligent tutoring systems and educational data mining. However, most implementations rely on expectation-maximization or related optimization methods that yield only point estimates, limiting uncertainty quantification and principled comparisons across learners and conditions. We introduce StanBKT, an open-source Python package for estimating BKT models using Bayesian inference in Stan. StanBKT provides a unified framework supporting Hamiltonian Monte Carlo, variational inference, Pathfinder, and optimization-based estimation while preserving the hidden Markov structure and interpretability of classical BKT. It supports standard, grouped, and hierarchical BKT models, flexible prior specification, posterior predictive inference, and utilities for visualization and diagnostics. We evaluate StanBKT on large-scale observational and controlled educational datasets. On the ASSISTments 2020 dataset, we show that supported inference methods achieve comparable predictive performance while differing in computational efficiency and posterior fidelity. We further demonstrate how posterior inference enables principled comparison of condition-specific parameters in an educational intervention involving perceptual cue manipulations. Results illustrate how uncertainty quantification facilitates more reliable interpretation of differences in learning, forgetting, guessing, and slipping parameters across experimental conditions. Overall, StanBKT extends BKT beyond point estimation by providing a flexible framework for probabilistic student modeling, uncertainty quantification, and hierarchical inference in educational data mining.

2026-05-21T21:27:10Z 5 figures, 7 tables Siddhartha Pradhan Yanping Pei Morgan Lee Puyuan Zhang Erin Ottmar Adam C. Sales http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.23023v1 2026-05-21T20:47:18Z

In orchestrated multi-agent systems, humans often struggle to manage plans due to their complexity and limited transparency. Existing approaches rely on outcome-level supervision, where users verify only final outputs without visibility into intermediate reasoning. We formalize a design space for human-LLM co-planning interactions along three axes: mode (semantic vs. structural), scope (global vs. targeted), and level (low vs. high-level edits). We realize it in AMBIPOM, a prototype supporting process-level supervision through both semantic and structural interactions. Through a user study, we characterize how users navigate this space, revealing hybrid workflows and effort-control-risk trade-offs; through a controlled benchmark, we analyze how LLMs revise plans under varying scope and revision strategies. Our findings yield design insights for more transparent, controllable, and effective human-AI co-planning. We release code and data at https://github.com/megagonlabs/ambipom.

2026-05-21T20:47:18Z ACM Conference on AI and Agentic Systems (CAIS) 2026 Zeyu He Hannah Kim Dan Zhang Estevam Hruschka 10.1145/3786335.3813144 http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.22986v1 2026-05-21T19:34:14Z

Learning reward functions from demonstrations assumes that demonstrations provide adequate supervision over all features -- or task-relevant aspects of behavior. In practice, demonstrations are often imperfect: humans may under-emphasize certain features due to cognitive load or physical difficulty, or the training regime may fail to sufficiently cover all relevant situations. In either case, important features may be underspecified, leading to ambiguity in the learned reward function and misaligned behavior at deployment. We propose a framework that detects such underspecified features and actively solicits targeted corrective demonstrations. Our key insight is that demonstrations implicitly reveal which features are well specified: features that are consistently optimized show little variation across demonstrations, while features that are underspecified vary widely. We leverage this statistical signal to infer which features may have been insufficiently demonstrated. The robot then explains which features it is uncertain about in natural language and queries for demonstrations that explicitly address the identified gaps. We evaluate our approach in a simulated tabletop manipulation domain and in a user study with a real Franka robot. Targeted, explanation-guided queries significantly improve reward recovery compared to random querying and passive data collection, reducing ambiguity that would otherwise persist in learning from imperfect demonstrations.

2026-05-21T19:34:14Z Helena Merker Nick Walker Andreea Bobu http://arxiv.org/abs/2504.09846v2 2026-05-21T19:12:04Z

Frequent and long-term exposure to hyperglycemia increases the risk of chronic complications, including neuropathy, nephropathy, and cardiovascular disease. Existing continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) and continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) technologies model only specific aspects of glycemic regulation, such as predicting hypoglycemia and administering small insulin boluses. Similarly, current digital twin approaches in diabetes management primarily focus on predicting glucose responses to human behavior and insulin therapy. As a result, these technologies lack the ability to provide alternative treatment scenarios that could guide proactive behavioral interventions for optimal diabetes management. To address this gap, we propose GlyTwin, a novel computational framework that enhances digital twin technologies by integrating counterfactual explanations to simulate optimal behavioral treatments for glucose control. GlyTwin generates counterfactual treatments by recommending adjustments to behavioral choices, such as carbohydrate intake and insulin dosing, to significantly reduce the occurrence and duration of hyperglycemic events. In addition, GlyTwin incorporates stakeholder preferences into its intervention-generation process, ensuring that the tool is personalized and user-centric. We evaluate GlyTwin on AZT1D, a new dataset constructed by collecting longitudinal data from 50 individuals living with type 1 diabetes (T1D) on automated insulin delivery (AID) systems, each monitored for 26 days. Results show that GlyTwin outperforms state-of-the-art methods for generating counterfactual explanations, with 85.8\% valid explanations and 87.3\% effectiveness in preventing hyperglycemia compared with historical data.

2025-04-14T03:32:39Z Asiful Arefeen Saman Khamesian Maria Adela Grando Bithika Thompson Hassan Ghasemzadeh http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.22971v1 2026-05-21T19:01:16Z

Employees often struggle to identify ``who knows what,'' leading to organizational productivity losses. We investigate whether Large Language Models (LLMs) can infer individual domain knowledge directly from long-term Slack logs. Analyzing 27,188 messages from 43 users, we evaluated seven models (including Gemini, Claude, and GPT families) by comparing their zero-shot estimates against self-reported skill ratings from 27 participants. Gemini 2.5 Flash achieved the lowest error (MAE 21.13%), while GPT models showed significantly larger discrepancies. Notably, estimation accuracy depended only weakly on message volume, indicating that more text alone does not guarantee better inference. These findings demonstrate the feasibility and current limits of automated expertise mapping, highlighting the need for privacy-preserving deployments and richer, structure-aware representations of human knowledge.

2026-05-21T19:01:16Z Ko Watanabe Shoya Ishimaru http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.13241v2 2026-05-21T19:00:01Z

Emergency call-takers form the first operational link in public safety response, handling over 240 million calls annually while facing a sustained training crisis: staffing shortages exceed 25\% in many centers, and preparing a single new hire can require up to 720 hours of one-on-one instruction that removes experienced personnel from active duty. Traditional training approaches struggle to scale under these constraints, limiting both coverage and feedback timeliness. In partnership with Metro Nashville Department of Emergency Communications (MNDEC), we designed, developed, and deployed a GenAI-powered call-taking training system under real-world constraints. Over six months, deployment scaled from initial pilot to 190 operational users across 1,120 training sessions, exposing systematic challenges around system delivery, rigor, resilience, and human factors that remain largely invisible in controlled or purely simulated evaluations. By analyzing deployment logs capturing 98,429 user interactions, organizational processes, and stakeholder engagement patterns, we distill four key lessons, each coupled with concrete design and governance practices. These lessons provide grounded guidance for researchers and practitioners seeking to deliver AI-driven training systems in safety-critical public sector environments where practical constraints fundamentally shape human-centric design.

2026-01-30T18:05:59Z Accepted at IEEE SmartComp 2026 Zirong Chen Yilin Liu Meiyi Ma http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.22962v1 2026-05-21T18:47:56Z

Video recordings of child-caregiver interactions enable investigation of attentional dynamics during naturalistic behavior. Such multimodal recording also allows researchers to examine how attention interacts with action and language use in real time. However, manual annotation of such data is time-consuming. Here, we introduce GazeBehavior Annotation Toolkit, a deep-learning-based toolkit designed to facilitate three key processes in data preprocessing and feature extraction: post-hoc synchronization across multiple videos, semi-automatic annotation of gaze target categories, and categorization of participants' poses and hand actions. This toolkit improves the efficiency and scalability of feature extraction from human egocentric eye-tracking and video data. Such improvement is critical in supporting large-scale and longitudinal investigations of attentional dynamics and naturalistic behavior in human early development.

2026-05-21T18:47:56Z submitted to IEEE International Conference on Development and Learning (ICDL), 2026 Iba Baig Kevin Li Yanbin Xu Seiji Cattelain Marie Hallo Hayato Ono Sho Tsuji Ming Bo Cai http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.07813v2 2026-05-21T18:10:17Z

Learning theories have historically changed when the conditions of learning evolved. Generative and agentic AI create a new condition by allowing learners to delegate explanation, writing, problem solving, and other cognitive work to systems that can generate, recommend, and sometimes act on the learner's behalf. This creates a fundamental challenge for learning theory: successful performance can no longer be assumed to indicate learning. Learners may complete tasks effectively with AI support while developing less understanding, weaker judgment, and limited transferable capability. We argue that this problem is not fully captured by existing learning theories. Behaviourism, cognitivism, constructivism, and connectivism remain important, but they do not directly explain when AI-assisted performance becomes durable human capability. We propose Agentivism, a learning theory for human-AI interaction. Agentivism defines learning as durable growth in human capability through selective delegation to AI, epistemic monitoring and verification of AI contributions, reconstructive internalization of AI-assisted outputs, and transfer under reduced support. The importance of Agentivism lies in explaining how learning remains possible when intelligent delegation is easy and human-AI interaction is becoming a persistent and expanding part of human learning.

2026-04-09T05:09:48Z Lixiang Yan Dragan Gašević http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.22775v1 2026-05-21T17:33:41Z

Real-time cognitive load assessment from eye-tracking signals could potentially enable adaptive human-centered-AI such as safety-critical applications such as driver vigilance monitoring or automated flight deck assistance, yet two challenges persist: handling frequent data missingness from blinks and tracking failures, and efficiently modeling long-range temporal dependencies. We propose MambaGaze, a framework that addresses these challenges through 1) XMD encoding, which augments raw features with observation masks and time-deltas to explicitly model data uncertainty, and 2) bidirectional Mamba-2, which captures temporal dependencies with linear computational complexity. Experiments on CLARE and CL-Drive datasets under leave-one-subject-out evaluation show that MambaGaze achieves 76.8% and 73.1% accuracy, respectively, outperforming CNN, Transformer, ResNet, and VGG baselines by 4-12 percentage points. Edge deployment benchmarks on NVIDIA Jetson platforms demonstrate real-time inference at 43-68 FPS with power consumption below 7.5W, confirming feasibility for wearable cognitive load monitoring.

2026-05-21T17:33:41Z Submitted to IEEE-EMBS International Conference on Biomedical and Health Informatics (BHI 2026) Amir Mousavi Mohammad Sadegh Sirjani Erfan Nourbakhsh Mimi Xie Rocky Slavin Leslie Neely John Davis John Quarles http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.22732v1 2026-05-21T17:03:37Z

We investigate whether acoustic emotion recognition models can serve as proxies for the Pathos dimension in political speech analysis, as operationalised by the TRUST multi-agent large language model (LLM) pipeline. Using a Bundestag plenary speech by Felix Banaszak (51 segments, 245 s) as a case study, we compare three analysis modalities: (1) emotion2vec_plus_large, an acoustic speech emotion recognition (SER) model whose continuous Arousal and Valence values are derived via post-hoc Russell Circumplex projection; (2) Gemini 2.5 Flash, an LLM analysing the full speech audio together with its transcript in an open-ended, context-aware fashion; and (3) TRUST-Pathos scores from a three-advocate LLM supervisor ensemble. Spearman rank correlations reveal that Gemini Valence correlates strongly with TRUST-Pathos (rho = +0.664, p < 0.001), whereas emotion2vec Valence does not (rho = +0.097, p = 0.499). We further demonstrate, via a systematic quality evaluation of the Berlin Database of Emotional Speech (EMO-DB) using Gemini in an open-ended annotation paradigm, that standard SER benchmark corpora suffer from acted speech, cultural bias, and category incompatibility. Our results suggest that LLM-based multimodal analysis captures semantically defined political emotion substantially better than acoustic models alone, while acoustic features remain informative for low-level Arousal estimation. Future work will extend this approach to video-based analysis incorporating facial expression and gaze.

2026-05-21T17:03:37Z 13 pages, 1 figure Juergen Dietrich http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.22720v1 2026-05-21T16:55:39Z

AI models are already deployed in societies affected by armed conflict, and journalists, humanitarian workers, governments and ordinary citizens rely on them for information or for their work processes. No established practice exists for checking whether their outputs can make those conflicts worse. We tested nine model configurations from four providers (OpenAI, Anthropic, DeepSeek, xAI) on 90 multi-turn scenarios designed to surface misaligned behaviour in conflict contexts: false equivalence between documented atrocities, denial of genocide, and failure to recognise ethnic slurs, among others. When such outputs feed into journalism, humanitarian reporting, or public debate, they can deepen divisions in fragile societies. Failure rates span 6\% to 47\% between the best and worst performing models, which makes model choice a safety question in its own right and when users pushed for ``balance'' in cases where international courts have already assigned responsibility, five of nine configurations failed 80 to 100 percent of the time. We release the first evaluation framework for this domain and propose adding it to alignment evaluation portfolios.

2026-05-21T16:55:39Z Preprint. 8 pages, 2 figures. Code and evaluation framework: https://github.com/akryshtal/conflict-sensitivity-eval-bloom Andrii Kryshtal http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.22707v1 2026-05-21T16:46:44Z

An increasing number of news and research articles report that AI adoption is allowing professionals to blur and extend the boundaries of their corporate roles. With the goal of understanding how work processes might be changing in an AI-forward company, we interviewed 24 product-focused individuals at a large technology firm about how AI has impacted their own work, their work within their product team, and their professional interactions. Our conversations suggest that AI is not only changing formal role responsibilities and collaborations between those roles, but also changing informal cultural practices like professional mentoring that are key to helping professionals settle in their positions, stay engaged with their work, and grow their careers. Some of these changes are positive, such as smoother collaboration between peers, but other changes are more nuanced and put the typical career growth opportunities, like receiving feedback from professional networks and promoting leadership and mentorship, at risk. We propose steps that AI companies can take to make the invisible work more visible. Additionally, we propose efforts that individuals and leaders can take to support their colleagues through AI transformation while preserving healthy company cultures that support diverse thinking, collaboration, and informal interactions.

2026-05-21T16:46:44Z 10 pages Stephanie Rosenthal Shamsi Iqbal http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.22687v1 2026-05-21T16:28:20Z

People are increasingly turning to AI assistance for simple tasks, e.g., arithmetic, spell-check, and answering simple questions. But does AI assistance actually save users time and effort? We investigate people's propensity to use AI for cognitively simple tasks and assess whether their reliance is well-calibrated. Across three pre-registered user studies (N = 2691), we find that people frequently choose to use AI even when doing so is inefficient (i.e. provides no meaningful time or effort savings). We identify systematic miscalibration at two levels: (1) a self-estimate miscalibration where people on average believe that they are using AI less than they actually are, and (2) efficiency-gain illusions where people overestimate how much time and effort savings AI use affords. We also identify a session-level carryover effect where a participant's prior AI use leads to further AI adoption and entrenches their miscalibration about time savings. Our results shed light on the mechanisms and biases underlying people's choice of whether to use AI as well as the risk of an overreliance feedback loop.

2026-05-21T16:28:20Z Sunny Yu Myra Cheng Ahmad Jabbar Ilia Sucholutsky Katherine M. Collins Dan Jurafsky Robert D. Hawkins http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.04111v3 2026-05-21T16:22:06Z

LLM-powered coding agents are reshaping the development paradigm. However, existing evaluation systems, neither traditional tests for humans nor benchmarks for LLMs, fail to capture this shift, excluding problems that require both human reasoning to guide solutions and AI efficiency for implementation. We introduce CentaurEval, a unified, ecologically valid benchmark for measuring human-in-the-loop value in coding. CentaurEval's core innovation is its "Collaboration-Necessary" problem templates, which are intractable for standalone LLMs or humans, but solvable through effective collaboration. CentaurEval dynamically instantiates tasks from 45 templates, providing a standardized IDE for humans and a reproducible 450-task toolkit for LLMs. We benchmark 45 participants against 5 LLMs under 4 levels of human intervention. Results show that while LLMs or humans alone achieve poor pass rates (0.67% and 18.89%), human-AI collaboration significantly improves to 31.11%. Our analysis reveals an emerging co-reasoning partnership, challenging the traditional human-tool hierarchy by showing that strategic breakthroughs can originate from either humans or AI.

2025-11-30T21:44:44Z Accepted by ICML 2026 Hanjun Luo Chiming Ni Jiaheng Wen Zhimu Huang Yiran Wang Bingduo Liao Sylvia Chung Yingbin Jin Xinfeng Li Wenyuan Xu XiaoFeng Wang Hanan Salam