https://arxiv.org/api/UyRfVACtqK40fCOv2ff1NWQTPlk 2026-06-14T18:52:16Z 30934 465 15 http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.05651v3 2026-05-22T10:29:08Z

People care about climate change, injustice, and humanitarian crises. The challenge is not apathy but capacity: sustained engagement with large-scale problems is psychologically costly, and social media architecture often amplifies awareness while providing few pathways to meaningful action. The result is rising distress, overwhelm, and disengagement -- particularly among young people who encounter global suffering through platforms designed for attention capture rather than constructive response. This workshop examines how social technology design shapes the conditions for sustained engagement with societal challenges. Drawing on Tronto's care ethics framework and research in moral psychology and platform studies, we ask why caring at scale is difficult and how social media can both exacerbate and potentially mitigate this difficulty. Tronto's framework shows that good care requires more than awareness: it demands responsibility, competence, and community. Dominant social media architectures stall the caring process at its earliest phase. We invite researchers and designers to identify platform designs that deplete or support the capacity to care, and to develop design directions for sustainable care: engagement that people can maintain over time without burning out.

2026-05-07T04:06:30Z JaeWon Kim Lindsay Popowski Louisa Conwill Elizabeth `Lizzie' Li Meryl Ye Jiaying `Lizzy' Liu Jose A. Guridi Theia Henderson Bingxu Han Dennis Wang Angel Hsing-Chi Hwang Susan Wyche Yasmine Kotturi Gillian R. Hayes Angela D. R. Smith 10.1145/3785651.3816117 http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.07025v2 2026-05-22T10:19:33Z

We present a design framework for friendship-supportive youth social media, derived from a synthesis of five empirical studies with 331 youth participants (ages 13-25) using interviews, co-design, surveys, diary studies, and a field deployment. Iterative analysis of 209 design-relevant data points identified three pillars: Social Understanding (interaction norms, interaction cues and scaffolding, social accountability and governance), Placeness (third place and community, boundaries and personal spaces, shared presence), and Identity Alignment (identity currency, identity plurality, relational identity signals). The framework maps nine design spaces through which platforms can support the conditions under which youth friendships form, deepen, and are maintained. It offers a shared vocabulary for locating contributions, comparing design interventions, and identifying under-explored areas for future work.

2026-05-07T23:13:40Z JaeWon Kim Alexis Hiniker 10.1145/3773077.3812190 http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.20298v4 2026-05-22T09:51:52Z

Growing reliance on LLMs for psychiatric self-assessment raises questions about their ability to interpret qualitative patient narratives. This depth over breadth case study directly compares state-of-the-art LLMs and mental health professionals in assessing Borderline (BPD) and Narcissistic (NPD) Personality Disorders based on Polish-language first-person autobiographical accounts. Within our sample, the overall diagnostic scores of the top-performing Gemini Pro models (65.48%) were 21.91 percentage points higher than the average scores of the human professionals (43.57%). While both models and human experts excelled at identifying BPD (F1 = 83.4 & F1 = 80.0, respectively), models severely underdiagnosed NPD (F1 = 6.7 vs. 50.0), showing a potential reluctance toward the value-laden term "narcissism." Qualitatively, models provided confident, elaborate justifications focused on patterns and formal categories, while human experts remained concise and cautious, emphasizing the patients' sense of self and temporal experience. Our findings demonstrate that while LLMs might be competent at interpreting complex first-person clinical data, their outputs still carry critical reliability and bias issues.

2025-12-23T12:05:01Z Karolina Drożdż Kacper Dudzic Anna Sterna Marcin Moskalewicz http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.19575v4 2026-05-22T09:44:29Z

Recently, the data protection practices of researchers in human-computer interaction and elsewhere have gained attention. Initial results suggest that researchers struggle with anonymization, partly due to a lack of clear, actionable guidance. In this work, we propose simulating re-identification attacks using the approach of red teaming versus blue teaming: a technique commonly employed in security testing, where one team tries to re-identify data, and the other team tries to prevent it. We discuss our experience applying this method to data collected in a mixed-methods study in human-centered privacy. We present usable materials for researchers to apply red teaming when anonymizing and publishing their studies' data.

2026-01-27T13:04:06Z Luisa Jansen Tim Ulmann Robine Jordi Malte Elson http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.23426v1 2026-05-22T09:37:36Z

Socially fluent agentic AI can now participate in online interaction in ways that resemble ordinary human conversation, potentially weakening people's ability to infer who is human from conversational signals alone. We tested this possibility in synchronous text-based group interaction by embedding undisclosed AI agents as ordinary teammates across analytical, creative, and ethical tasks. Across 786 participants who made 1,572 post-interaction identity judgments, people did not distinguish AI from human teammates above chance. This failure did not arise because the interaction lacked identity-relevant information. Conversational behaviour contained robust cues that differentiated AI from humans and supported highly accurate computational classification. Instead, participants relied on familiar suspicion heuristics, including response speed, fluency, and perceived scriptedness, that were only weakly related to actual identity. Representational analyses further showed that judgments were organised around subjective impressions rather than the behavioural structure encoding ground truth. This dissociation creates new vulnerabilities to coordinated AI agents that can influence and manipulate online discourse at scale.

2026-05-22T09:37:36Z Lixiang Yan Yueqiao Jin Xibin Han Dragan Gašević http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.06307v2 2026-05-22T07:49:11Z

Student simulation with Large language models (LLMs) offers a scalable alternative for educational research and teacher training. Yet, its validity depends on whether models maintain stable personas across extended interactions. We test this prerequisite using a dual-assessment framework measuring self-reported characteristics and observer-rated behavioral expressions. Across two experiments testing four clinically-grounded ADHD persona conditions, five LLMs, and three prompt designs, we quantify between-conversation stability (N=4,968) and within-conversation stability (N=3,952 across 9 turns). Self-reported characteristics remain stable for high intensities, constituting a necessary prerequisite for valid behavioral simulation. Observer-rated behavioral expression reveals selective instability: within-conversation drift occurs in unscripted dialog for high and moderate ADHD personas. Scripted interactions with explicit task prompts eliminate this drift entirely. Stable, persona-aligned simulated learners benefit from a structured interaction design to maintain behavioral coherence, which holds significant implications for teacher training, adaptive tutoring, and any application requiring sustained, path-dependent learner interactions.

2026-05-07T14:09:31Z Jana Gonnermann-Müller Jennifer Haase Nicolas Leins Thomas Kosch Sebastian Pokutta http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.22788v4 2026-05-22T06:31:49Z

Classrooms are becoming increasingly heterogeneous, comprising learners with diverse performance and motivation levels, language proficiencies, and learning differences such as dyslexia and ADHD. While teachers recognize the need for differentiated instruction, growing workloads create substantial barriers, making differentiated instruction an ideal that is often unrealized in practice. Current AI educational tools, which promise differentiated materials, are predominantly student-facing and performance-centric, ignoring other aspects that shape learning outcomes. We introduce FACET, a teacher-facing multi-agent framework designed to address these gaps by supporting differentiation that accounts for motivation, performance, and learning differences. Developed with educational stakeholders from the outset, the framework coordinates four specialized agents, including learner simulation, diagnostic assessment, material generation, and evaluation within a teacher-in-the-loop design. School principals (N = 30) shaped system requirements through participatory workshops, while in-service K-12 teachers (N = 70) evaluated material quality. Mixed-methods evaluation demonstrates strong perceived value for inclusive differentiation. Practitioners emphasized both the urgent need arising from classroom heterogeneity and the importance of maintaining pedagogical autonomy as a prerequisite for adoption. We discuss implications for future school deployment and outline partnerships for longitudinal classroom implementation.

2026-01-30T10:08:43Z Jana Gonnermann-Müller Jennifer Haase Nicolas Leins Moritz Igel Konstantin Fackeldey Sebastian Pokutta http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.11562v2 2026-05-22T06:24:35Z

Background: Stress has become a widespread phenomenon, and serious games are increasingly recognized as engaging tools for stress relief. However, despite the rapid advancement of Generative Artificial Intelligence (Gen-AI), its integration into stress-relief serious games remains insufficiently explored. Objective: This study aimed to address this gap by developing "Reverie", an Gen-AI driven serious game powered by the Unity engine and ChatGPT, and to preliminarily evaluate its effectiveness in stress reduction, user experience, and cognitive emotion regulation. Methods: A 14-day pilot study was conducted with 20 students experiencing moderate to high levels of stress. Participants used "Reverie" as a stress-relief intervention. Stress levels, user experience, and cognitive emotion regulation strategies were assessed to examine the game's feasibility and preliminary efficacy. Results: The results showed that "Reverie" significantly reduced participants' stress levels over the intervention period (p=.016*), indicating a cumulative positive effect. In addition, the game demonstrated excellent user experience and was associated with improvements in cognitive emotion regulation strategies. Conclusions: This study proposes a Gen-AI driven design framework for serious games for stress relief. Besides, this pilot study provides initial support for the feasibility and promise of combining LLM-driven gameplay in a personalized digital intervention context.

2026-05-12T05:48:38Z Ting-Chen Hsu http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.23242v1 2026-05-22T05:24:37Z

We present Cogniscope, an open evaluation framework for studying longitudinal early-risk AI systems under controlled behavioral drift, sparse observations, delayed evidence, and heterogeneous progression patterns. Cogniscope combines two complementary components: a synthetic simulation engine that generates privacy-preserving longitudinal behavioral traces aligned with configurable latent risk trajectories, and a browser-based data-collection instrument implemented as a Chrome extension for capturing naturalistic video interaction telemetry and micro-question responses during YouTube playback. The released benchmark includes 200,000 simulated video-interaction records from 200 users over 200 days, a 504-session schema-aligned synthetic deployment dataset across nine behavioral profiles, an 18-table relational schema, baseline evaluation scripts, and time-aware metrics including Early Risk Detection Error (ERDE) and time-to-detection (TTD). We emphasize that Cogniscope is not a diagnostic system and does not claim clinical validity. Instead, it provides a reusable testbed for evaluating how sequential models behave under known longitudinal challenges before deployment with real human-subject data. Experiments show that simple behavioral coherence signals separate simulated risk states under controlled priors, while rule-based deployment-profile classification remains challenging, motivating learned temporal models and robust evaluation protocols.

2026-05-22T05:24:37Z Mahfuza Farooque Ananya Drishti Mukhil Muruganantham Prakaash Uttkarsh Agarwal Zahra Abdul Basit Asish Kondragunta http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.17468v2 2026-05-22T04:13:28Z

This paper presents an interpretable closed-loop Intelligent Tutoring System (ITS) that supports feedback-guided practice for developing on-camera oral presentation skills at scale. The system operationalizes a seven-dimensional Behaviorally Anchored Rating Scale (BARS) and implements a three-layer interpretable feedback architecture that connects rubric-aligned multimodal scoring, audience-perceived expressive diagnostics, and retrieval-augmented conversational coaching to support deliberate practice. Built on an XGBoost backbone, the ITS maps multimodal inputs (facial, vocal, textual, and oculomotor features) into evidence-based feedback that can be traced back to observable performance cues. Trained on 10,360 Massive Open Online Course (MOOC) video segments, the system achieved rubric-aligned scoring with performance levels comparable to expert ratings (R2 = 0.48-0.61, Spearman's rho = 0.69-0.78, MAE = 0.43-0.57). In a pre-post validation study with 204 adult learners over a 30-day practice window, participants demonstrated significant improvements across all seven BARS dimensions (Cohen's d = 0.39-0.90), with practice frequency showing a strong positive association with posttest performance after controlling for baseline scores and demographics. The results demonstrate how multimodal analytic outputs can be systematically transformed into observable behavioral change through an integrated feedback architecture, advancing explainable and pedagogically grounded ITS design for performance-based competencies.

2026-05-17T14:12:40Z 12 pages, 8 figures, IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 2026 Hung-Yue Suen Kuo-En Hung 10.1109/TLT.2026.3693864 http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.23193v1 2026-05-22T03:20:04Z

Gardening is critical to support well-being, cultural continuity, and food autonomy, yet existing digital tools often provide generic advice that overlooks gardeners' skills, local ecologies, seasons, and cultural contexts. We introduce CultivAgents, a relationship-centered multi-agent system for personalized, socio-culturally grounded gardening support. Grounded in ethics of care, CultivAgents coordinates multiple specialized agents: an Experience Agent that adapts guidance to users' skill levels, an Environmental Agent that grounds advice in local and seasonal conditions, and an Ethnobotanical Agent that connects plants to cultural knowledge and histories. We evaluated CultivAgents through a three-phase mixed-methods study with domain experts (n=3), HCI researchers (n=7), and community gardeners (n=5), analyzing expert feedback, pre/post surveys, and participatory design activities. Results suggest that CultivAgents helped gardeners translate interest into situated action: community gardeners reported increased confidence (3.00 to 3.60), motivation (4.00 to 4.40), and trust in acting on AI advice (3.20 to 4.00). Participants valued hyperlocal ecological guidance and complementary agent perspectives, while also identifying limits in cultural specificity, ecological grounding, and agent coordination. The work advances relationship-centered AI, offering design implications for multi-agent systems that support food sovereignty, community resilience, and cultural preservation.

2026-05-22T03:20:04Z Preprint, 9 pages. Website: https://hello-diana.github.io/CultivAgents/ Yiyang Wang Moeiini Reilly Britney Johnson Kefei Yan Alex Cabral Josiah Hester http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.23177v1 2026-05-22T02:53:12Z

Large language models (LLMs) have the potential to boost human productivity by speeding up task completion -- provided users know when to offload cognitive work to them. But we do not know if users are well-calibrated in estimating these potential time savings. We conducted a preregistered large-scale behavioral study (N = 1237) to characterize mismatches between expectations and reality, with a focus on simple cognitive tasks. While actual completion times between independent completion and AI-assisted completion did not differ, participants predicted AI to be significantly faster. The same bias was not observed when imagining help from another human participant. We identify a speedup illusion where people have accurate forecasts of independent completion times but significantly underestimate AI-assisted times. Additionally, time and effort dissociate: participants reported lower subjective effort with AI despite equivalent completion times. This suggests that completion time itself is not sufficient to characterize efficiency gains.

2026-05-22T02:53:12Z Proceedings of the 48th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society Sunny Yu Myra Cheng Ahmad Jabbar Ilia Sucholutsky Katherine M. Collins Dan Jurafsky Robert D. Hawkins http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.23123v1 2026-05-22T00:46:39Z

The integration of AI tools in academic settings has introduced a distinct form of strain that existing frameworks like technostress and digital fatigue have not yet fully addressed. This study develops a conceptual model and identifies the dimensions that define AI fatigue as a form of strain arising from sustained academic use of AI tools. Using grounded theory analysis of open-ended responses from 1,054 university students across three universities in the Philippines, the study examined the cognitive, motivational, emotional, physical, and attentional pressures students experienced during AI-supported academic work. Analysis produced five dimensions of AI fatigue, namely Cognitive Overload, Motivational Disengagement, Moral Unease, Physical Strain, and Attentional Drift, each consisting of two indicators grounded in participant accounts. The findings also yielded the AI Fatigue Model, a stage-based framework that explains how these pressures accumulate and reinforce one another across repeated AI interaction in academic tasks. These contributions establish a conceptual and exploratory foundation for AI fatigue as a distinct construct and provide a basis for future instrument validation, scale development, and cross-contextual inquiry in academic settings where AI now mediates student learning.

2026-05-22T00:46:39Z 17 pages, journal article, Volume 25, Issue 5, International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 25(5), 91-107 (2026) John Paul P. Miranda Emmanuel B. Parreño Jovita G. Rivera 10.26803/ijlter.25.5.5 http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.07018v2 2026-05-21T23:17:35Z

Social media is central to how young people maintain relationships, develop identity, and access communities, yet dominant platform designs often leave youth feeling disempowered rather than supported. My dissertation argues that youth social media design is shaped by three forms of problem-space misattunement. \textit{Conceptual misattunement} occurs when the language of ``social media'' anchors participants to existing platforms' interaction templates. I address this through a Fictional Inquiry design workshop that frees youth from preconceived notions of social media by having them brainstorm ways to ``magically connect with remote wizard friends'' rather than ideas for ``social media.'' \textit{Definitional misattunement} occurs when researchers define what ``better'' means on youth's behalf. I address this through a Discord-based asynchronous community that supports youth-led collective inquiry. \textit{Evaluative misattunement} occurs when participants are asked to judge static or hypothetical designs. I address this through an ego-anchored, LLM-agent simulation sandbox. Together, these studies develop youth-grounded criteria and design directions for relationally supportive social media.

2026-05-07T23:03:21Z JaeWon Kim 10.1145/3802974.3807979 http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.09600v3 2026-05-21T22:51:29Z

Online information access (IA) platforms are targets of authoritarian capture. We explore the question of how to safeguard our platforms and ensure emancipatory outcomes through the lens of Paulo Freire's theories of emancipatory pedagogy. Freire's theories provide a radically different lens for exploring IA's sociotechnical concerns relative to the current dominating frames of fairness, accountability, and transparency. We make explicit, with the intention to challenge, the technologist-user dichotomy in IA platform development that mirrors the teacher-student relation in Freire's analysis. By extending Freire's analysis to IA, we critique the technologists-as-liberator frame where it is the burden of (altruistic) technologists to mitigate the risks of emerging technologies for marginalized communities. Instead, we advocate for Freirean Design whose goal is to structurally expose the platform for co-option and co-construction by community members in aid of their emancipatory struggles.

2026-01-14T16:15:26Z Bhaskar Mitra Nicola Neophytou Sireesh Gururaja