Identifying cybersickness causes in virtual reality games using symbolic machine learning algorithms

2026-06-10T15:29:31Z

Virtual reality (VR) and head-mounted displays are constantly gaining popularity in various fields such as education, military, entertainment, and health. Although such technologies provide a high sense of immersion, they can also trigger symptoms of discomfort. This condition is called cybersickness (CS) and is quite popular in recent virtual reality publications. This work proposes a novel experimental analysis using symbolic machine learning to rank potential causes of CS in VR games. We estimate CS causes and rank them according to their impact using classical machine learning. Experiments are performed using two virtual reality games and 6 experimental protocols along with 37 valid samples from a total of 88 volunteers. Our results show that rotation and acceleration triggered cybersickness more frequently in a flight game in contrast to a race game. We could also observe that subjects that are less experienced with VR are more prone to feel discomfort. Former experience plays a more important role on the race game, as this game provides more liberty to the user in terms of controllers, more displacement alternatives and a more user-controlled acceleration. Furthermore, different causes that trigger discomfort arise based on short or long term VR exposures. We suggest strategies for mitigating CS for these two scenarios: short and long term exposure experiences and compare the two highlighted scenarios (race and flight).

Visualization for Human-Centered AI Tools

2026-06-10T15:20:29Z

Human-centered AI (HCAI) puts the user in the driver's seat of so-called human-centered AI-infused tools (HCAI tools): interactive software tools that amplify, augment, empower, and enhance human performance using AI models. We discuss how interactive visualization can be a key enabling technology for creating such human-centered AI tools. To validate our approach, we surveyed the existing literature on HCI, AI, and visualization and interviewed researchers in relevant fields to define the characteristics of HCAI tools. We then present several examples of HCAI tools using visualization and use the examples to extract guidelines on how interactive visualization can support future HCAI tool research and development.

A Resilient Solution for Sewer Overflow Monitoring across Cloud and Edge

2026-06-10T12:36:28Z

Aging combined sewer systems in many historical cities are increasingly stressed by extreme rainfall events, which can trigger combined sewer overflows (CSO) with significant environmental and public health impacts. Forecasting the filling dynamics of overflow basins is critical for anticipating capacity exceedance and enabling timely preventive actions for CSO. We present a web-based demonstrator that integrates Deep Learning forecasting methods in both cloud and edge settings into an interactive monitoring dashboard for overflow monitoring, resilient to network outages. A video showcase is available online (https://cloud.bht-berlin.de/index.php/s/b9xt4T3SdiLBiFZ).

An XAI View on Explainable ASP: Methods, Systems, and Perspectives

2026-06-10T12:20:30Z

Answer Set Programming (ASP) is a popular declarative reasoning and problem solving approach in symbolic AI. Its rule-based formalism makes it inherently attractive for explainable and interpretive reasoning, which is gaining importance with the surge of Explainable AI (XAI). A number of explanation approaches and tools for ASP have been developed, which often tackle specific explanatory settings and may not cover all scenarios that ASP users encounter. In this survey, we provide, guided by an XAI perspective, an overview of types of ASP explanations in connection with user questions for explanation, and describe their coverage by current theory and tools. Furthermore, we pinpoint gaps in existing ASP explanations approaches and identify research directions for future work.

Participatory AI: A Scandinavian Approach to Human-Centered AI

2026-06-10T12:19:54Z

AI's transformative impact on work, education, and everyday life makes it as much a political artifact as a technological one. Current AI models are opaque, centralized, and overly generic. The algorithmic automation they provide threatens human agency and democratic values in both workplaces and daily life. To confront such challenges, we turn to Scandinavian Participatory Design (PD), which was devised in the 1970s to face a similar threat from mechanical automation. In the PD tradition, technology is seen not just as an artifact, but as a locus of democracy. Drawing from this tradition, we propose Participatory AI as a PD approach to human-centered AI that applies five PD principles to four design challenges for algorithmic automation. We use concrete case studies to illustrate how to treat AI models less as proprietary products and more as shared socio-technical systems that enhance rather than diminish human agency, human dignity, and human values.

Channels and Substrates: Distributed Cognition as an Interaction Model for Ubiquitous Analytics

2026-06-10T12:09:55Z

Traditional HCI interaction models assume a single monolithic interface and a stable sensorimotor loop. These models fit poorly with cross-device (XVA) and ubiquitous analytics (UA), where interactive data sensemaking unfolds across multiple devices, artifacts, and people in disparate settings from the office to the factory floor. In this paper, we show how interaction in ubiquitous analytics can be modeled using distributed cognition as propagation of representational state across substrates -- minds, speech, bodies, artifacts, and devices -- rather than as traffic through a single interface. On this basis we introduce input and output channels as generalizations of the visual channels from data visualization: just as visual channels carry data through properties of the visual substrate, input and output channels carry representational state through substrates whose availability, suitability, and preferability depend on context. We demonstrate the channels and substrates framework by reanalyzing several ubiquitous, immersive, and situated analytics systems.

Somewhere Over the Desktop: A Research Agenda for Ubiquitous Analytics

2026-06-10T11:57:44Z

Spatial computing, generative AI, and open web standards are converging. Three spatial operating systems -- Android XR, Meta Horizon OS, and Apple visionOS -- now ship with platform-level scene understanding. Wearable displays span the range from full headsets to slim smartglasses. Agentic AI operates on the same spatial substrates as the human user. This convergence enables new opportunities for \textit{ubiquitous analytics} (UA): the use of many, physically distributed, networked devices to support data sensemaking anytime and anywhere. But proprietary platforms are settling design conventions that will calcify without evidence-based alternatives. UA has now matured to the point where its intellectual history can be read as a structured genealogy of foundations, contributions, and lineages. We trace this genealogy and organize it into clusters spanning cognition, context, interaction, platforms, visualization, collaboration, and evaluation. Finally, we cross these clusters with each other, yielding a total of 42 future research challenges.

PAPEL: A Collaborative System for Parental Guidance during Preschool Play-Based English Learning

2026-06-10T10:25:42Z

Play-based parent-child interaction offers preschoolers rich opportunities for everyday foreign language learning, yet many parents struggle to turn open-ended play into effective English-as-a-Foreign-Language (EFL) learning experiences at home. To explore how AI might support this process, we conducted formative studies through interviews and a Wizard-of-Oz study. We identified four key challenges: content selection, language expression, balancing instruction and play, and problem solving. To address these challenges, we present PAPEL, a parent-AI collaborative system that grounds suggestions in the ongoing play scene and organizes support into four core modules: content generation, language adaptation, balance assessment, and extended response. In a counterbalanced within-subjects study with 16 parent-child dyads, PAPEL was associated with more integrated parent utterances that combined playful and instructional content, as well as more parent-child conversational turns, than the lightweight chatbot baseline used in our study.

Designing AI-Supported Focus Groups: A Role x Modality Playbook

2026-06-10T09:16:26Z

Collecting participants' lived experiences is central to design research. Focus groups are uniquely valuable because participants not only share individual accounts but also respond to one another, surfacing comparison, disagreement, and collective sensemaking. However, focus groups are resource-intensive and highly sensitive to facilitation: moderators must probe for specificity, balance participation, manage topic flow, and sustain psychological safety, and subtle facilitation choices can shape what becomes salient. Recent HCI work and commercial meeting tools show that generative AI can scaffold live conversation through prompting, turn regulation, thematic mapping, and real-time summarization. Yet UXR teams lack a clear map of what these capabilities mean in focus groups and what methodological risks they introduce. We synthesize AI supports for live conversation and translate them into a focus-group-specific playbook organized by AI role (tool, co-host, host) and modality (text, voice, embodied).We synthesize prior work on AI-supported live conversation and propose a focus-group-specific playbook of AI supports organized by role (tool, co-host, host) and modality (text, voice, embodied). We characterize interactional trade-offs and identify open questions for evaluating AI-supported focus groups as methodological configurations.

The Big Ban Theory: A Pre- and Post-Intervention Dataset of Online Content Moderation Actions

2026-06-10T08:59:24Z

Online platforms rely on moderation interventions to curb harmful behavior such as hate speech, toxicity, and the spread of mis- and disinformation. Yet research on the effects and possible biases of such interventions faces multiple limitations. For example, existing works frequently focus on single or a few interventions, due to the absence of comprehensive datasets. As a result, researchers must typically collect the necessary data for each new study, which limits opportunities for systematic comparisons. To overcome these challenges, we introduce The Big Ban Theory (TBBT) -- a large dataset of moderation interventions. TBBT covers 25 interventions of varying type, severity, and scope, comprising in total over 339K users and nearly 39M posted messages on Reddit and Voat. For each intervention, we provide standardized metadata and pseudonymized user activity collected three months before and after its enforcement, enabling consistent and comparable analyses of intervention effects. In addition, we provide a descriptive exploratory analysis of the dataset, along with several use cases of how it can support research on content moderation. With this dataset, we aim to support researchers studying the effects of moderation interventions and to promote more systematic, reproducible, and comparable research.

Catheter Monitoring in Intelligent Endovascular Navigation Systems: Interactive Simulations and Mixed Reality for Enhanced Navigational Awareness

2026-06-10T07:32:33Z

Purpose: Developing and testing a framework that integrates real-time catheter shape reconstruction, interactive simulations, and mixed reality visualization to enable accurate monitoring of catheter-vessel interactions during endovascular navigation. Methods: A finite element model (FEM) of the venous pathway from the right femoral vein to the inferior vena cava was generated from computed tomography data and implemented into an interactive simulation. Catheter motion was imposed as boundary condition, and catheter-vessel contact was modeled with a Lagrange multiplier formulation to compute vessel deformation. The framework was tested in-vitro using a sensorized catheter with Fiber Bragg Grating and electromagnetic sensors as it was advanced through a silicone replica of the vascular anatomy. Real-time sensor read-outs fed the simulation, and the updated catheter and vessel geometries were streamed to Hololens 2. The performance and accuracy of FEM-computed vessel wall displacement were validated against experimental ground-truth obtained via stereo frames triangulation. Results: The simulated time exceeded the real temporal extent by 12% during initial navigation and by 45% when the catheter reached the most tortuous portion. Hololens 2 rendering remained stable at 35-40 frames per second. The median relative displacement error between FEM-computed and ground-truth vessel wall displacements remained below 1 mm and 2.33 mm for these two phases, respectively. Conclusion: The study demonstrates the feasibility of integrating interactive biomechanical simulation with real-time sensor data to enable continuous monitoring of catheter-vessel interactions, with mixed reality visualization serving as a user interface to support operator decision-making.

Understanding and Supporting Online Discussion with Opinionated Chatbots

2026-06-10T06:16:34Z

Opinionated chatbots are increasingly present on online platforms and have the potential to shape public discourse by influencing individuals' viewpoints before they engage in discussions. Despite their growing presence, the impact of interacting with opinionated chatbots on subsequent online interactions remains largely unexplored. This study investigated how exposure to different types of opinionated chatbots, specifically those expressing opposing, reinforcing, or balanced viewpoints, affected participants' subsequent online discussions. In a controlled experiment with 83 participants, we found that interacting with an opinionated chatbot that consistently opposed participants' arguments led to greater shifts in opinion, indicating enhanced openness to revising one's initial stance. Conversely, participants who interacted with a chatbot that consistently reinforced their views were more likely to adopt more agreeable communication styles in subsequent conversations with others. Furthermore, interactions with different types of opinionated chatbots resulted in varying levels of trust, as well as different perceptions of chatbots and human interlocutors. Our findings indicate that opinionated chatbots can influence both individuals' opinions on social topics and their communication behaviors in online environments. This presents a trade-off for future designers seeking to facilitate cognitive flexibility in changing opinions while maintaining positive user experiences and trust in the chatbots during public discourse. We discuss the implications for designing opinionated chatbots to promote more constructive and less polarized online

Learning by Chatting? Investigating the Impact of Generative AI on Information Seeking and Learning

2026-06-10T05:28:32Z

Generative AI (GenAI) tools offer increasing opportunities for augmenting human cognitive tasks. Among these tasks, information seeking is being rapidly reshaped by GenAI tools, with potentially profound implications for learning and knowledge acquisition. To investigate these implications, we conducted a between-subjects field experiment in which participants pursued informal learning by seeking information through either ChatGPT or Google Search over a span of 8 days. Using a daily diary protocol, we gathered in-situ data on their information-seeking processes. Our findings show that participants in the ChatGPT group experienced diminished agency in their information-seeking processes, as they offloaded much of the information selection to AI, and consequently experienced greater meta-cognitive load arising from this reduced sense of control. We further highlight two sources of distortion in information access when using ChatGPT: biases in ChatGPT outputs, particularly towards providing solution-oriented artifacts over principled knowledge; and systematic shifts in users' information-seeking behaviors, whereby the conversational and socially-oriented interaction paradigm of current GenAI tools may inadvertently reduce exploration of the broader knowledge space. As a result, on average, participants in the ChatGPT group had worse learning outcomes than those using Google, especially for higher-order critical learning. Our work suggests inherent tensions between offloading information seeking to AI and meaningful learning, and provides broader implications for understanding AI's risks to human cognition.

Demonstrating chart-plot: Closing the Last Mile of Academic Chart Generation

2026-06-10T04:07:30Z

Large language models can translate a researcher's intent into runnable matplotlib code, yet the resulting chart rarely lands in a paper without multiple rounds of manual revision. We argue that the open problem is not chart code generation but chart publication: making the output look like a top-venue figure, survive the target layout, and respond to precise author edits. We present chart-plot, an agentic harness that closes this last mile through three components: (1) a style-aware code generator conditioned on a textual style skill distilled from accepted figures at the target venue, (2) a deployment-aware render loop that compiles the chart inside the target LaTeX context and revises until layout constraints are met, and (3) a structured edit layer that exposes every chart element as a directly manipulable handle. We report early results on three chart-type case studies (grouped bar, scaling line, paired distributions) and a small user study.

3-Key-Input: Exploring the Theoretical Minimum Keys for Text Entry

2026-06-10T04:06:41Z

How far can we reduce the number of physical keys if we endow an ambiguous keyboard with modern language models? Fewer keys increase hardware design freedom in constrained settings such as assistive devices and mobile form factors. This paper systematically evaluates text entry systems using 2-5 physical keys combined with language-model-based disambiguation. On a 300-sentence English corpus (100 sentences each for Business / Conversational / Technical), we compare key counts (2-5), letter-to-key mappings (layout-based / frequency-based / intentionally worst-case), and decoders (Trie-only, GPT-2 beam search, GPT-4o selection). We find that 3 keys + GPT-4o achieves character error rate (CER) 9.46% and word error rate (WER) 12.20%, reducing CER by 59% relative to 2 keys (CER 23.3%). At 3 keys, the key-stream entropy is 1.54 bits/char; while increasing to 5 keys improves accuracy (CER 5.4%), the marginal gains diminish. Mapping choice has a small impact under standard designs (ΔCER < 0.5 pp), and even an intentionally worst mapping degrades CER by only +0.5 pp, whereas Technical sentences yield roughly twice the error rate of Business. These results suggest that, in our evaluated offline setting under a strong LM prior, 3 keys are a practical minimum for general English.