https://arxiv.org/api/R9H89VughkooxF5j6bgvXdSS6UM 2026-06-14T01:25:40Z 30934 210 15 http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.27938v2 2026-06-02T12:47:55Z

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into healthcare has advanced significantly, yet affect recognition remains a major challenge, particularly in AI-assisted interventions such as Computerized Cognitive Training (CCT). The THERADIA-WoZ corpus was developed to enable multimodal affect recognition in the context of AI-driven CCT, focusing on an older adult population. This study extends the corpus by introducing a dataset collected from young adults, allowing direct comparison of affect recognition models across age groups. Our objective was to assess whether multimodal models based on dimensions borrowed from appraisal theories outperform those based on categorical labels and to evaluate their generalisation power across age corpora. After comparing both corpora, models were trained and tested using within-corpus, cross-corpus, and mixed-corpus evaluation. Results revealed that appraisal dimensions consistently outperformed categorical labels across all conditions, demonstrating greater predictive accuracy and stability. Notably, categorical labels failed to generalise across age corpora, as performance dropped to chance levels in cross-corpus evaluation. In contrast, appraisal dimensions maintained predictive performance above chance, reinforcing their robustness for cross-age affect recognition. Furthermore, training on both corpora did not improve generalisation beyond within-corpus training. The findings support the theoretical and practical advantages of appraisal dimensions over categorical labels in affective computing. They also highlight the importance of multimodal fusion and deep learning representations for emotion modeling. To facilitate future research, we provide an API for researchers interested in time-continuous emotion prediction, offering valuable tools for behavioral sciences to enhance the measurement of emotional states in various experimental settings.

2026-04-30T14:37:09Z Hippolyte Fournier Safaa Azzakhnini Sina Alisamir Isabella Zsoldos Eléonore Trân Gérard Bailly Frédéric Elisei Béatrice Bouchot Brice Varini Patrick Constant Joan Fruitet Franck Tarpin-Bernard Solange Rossato François Portet Olivier Koenig Hanna Chainay Fabien Ringeval http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.03560v1 2026-06-02T12:27:37Z

Although Generative AI (GenAI) improves task efficiency in the short term, it creates competitive pressures that perpetuate individuals' fear of being eliminated, thereby increasing the risk of problematic use. Existing research has focused on the perspective of individual psychological vulnerability, but has neglected the social comparison context caused by GenAI. This study examines the direct effects of social comparison orientation on problematic GenAI use and explores their indirect effects via emotional and cognitive mechanisms, grounded in the Person-Affect-Cognition-Execution (I-PACE) model. The research analyzed data from 396 Chinese GenAI users using SEM and bootstrap methods. Findings show that social comparison orientation has a significant direct impact on problematic GenAI use and can additionally influence AI flow and perceived irreplaceability through fear of missing out (FoMO), finally leading to problematic GenAI use.

2026-06-02T12:27:37Z Author's Original Manuscript. The Version of Record has been published in International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction Xuchao Zhang Jihye Lee 10.1080/10447318.2026.2668619 http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.03557v1 2026-06-02T12:22:03Z

As generative AI capabilities expand, AI-driven virtual worlds face a growing architectural challenge. Users interact through in-world interfaces in multimodal ways, yet their requests demand fundamentally different AI backend models and computational resources. Embedding these capabilities directly into virtual world systems reduces extensibility, complicates maintenance, and limits the ability to coordinate services distributed across edge and cloud infrastructure. This paper presents an SLM-based Agent Orchestration Gateway, a lightweight runtime coordination mechanism that decouples a virtual world client from heterogeneous AI backends through intent-driven service routing. An edge-deployed SLM classifies the semantic intent of each user prompt, a configurable service registry validates and resolves the routing decision, and the selected backend is invoked transparently, enabling new AI capabilities to be introduced in the virtual world without modifying the client application. The gateway is implemented and evaluated within the InterwovenXR virtual museum testbed. The evaluation shows that compact SLMs can serve as reliable intent routers on edge hardware, and that task-specific fine-tuning can transform sub-billion-parameter models into practical, low-latency routers. A layered configuration pairing a fine-tuned sub billion-parameter model as router with a larger SLM for conversational response generation is shown to be deployable on mid-range edge hardware and more efficient than delegating both responsibilities to a single model. The findings show that SLMs can support practical AI service orchestration in virtual worlds and the work contributes an evaluated architecture for scalable, extensible, and edge-supported AI interaction, enabling virtual agents become access points to distributed generative AI services.

2026-06-02T12:22:03Z Louis Nisiotis Aimilios Hadjiliasi http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.03492v1 2026-06-02T11:09:12Z

Where people look during shared activity carries coordination cues that speech and gesture cannot replace, but these patterns remain invisible to participants. XR headsets make gaze available as real-time input, yet few systems feed it back visually. We frame our work using the Attention-Aware Pipeline (Capture, Record, Revisualize), whose feedback loop means the systems visual response alters what users attend to next, triggering further responses. This generates design tensions whose form depends on each stages configuration. We trace the pipeline through three systems casting attention as a mirror (reflecting gaze history), a medium (sharing it across collaborators), and a mediator (intervening through diminished reality). Each encountered a tension the loop predicted, motivating the next. A formative eye-tracking study of four musicians surfaced attentional tunneling and near-total disconnection, confirming the need for intervention. We present these tensions and a next step: testing whether subtractive intervention reduces tunneling for a single sight-reader.

2026-06-02T11:09:12Z Arvind Srinivasan Niklas Elmqvist http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.03485v1 2026-06-02T11:01:43Z

Visual attention is central to ensemble coordination, yet how musicians allocate gaze during naturalistic rehearsal remains poorly understood. We present a pilot study using mobile eye tracking to examine gaze behaviour in a four-member band across three songs, each practiced twice. Musicians wore Pupil Labs Neon eye trackers, and YOLOv8-assisted scene annotations mapped fixations to ensemble members and objects in view. Analyzing fixation matrices, transition matrices, temporal scarf plots, and dwell-transition correlations, we uncover a hub-and-spoke attention topology: the session leader was the dominant gaze target for all members, while the learning guitarist concentrated up to 97% of interpersonal dwell on this single reference. Between attempts, gaze transitions decreased by up to 65% on average for unfamiliar material (up to 82% for individual participants) as scanning stabilized. Scarf plots reveal how teaching breakdowns fragment attention and uninterrupted runs consolidate it. Post-session participant reflections align with the quantitative patterns, and we discuss implications for gaze-aware tools in ensemble pedagogy.

2026-06-02T11:01:43Z Arvind Srinivasan Tobias Rau Michael Sedlmair http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.07069v3 2026-06-02T10:48:33Z

Group awareness--the ability to perceive the activities of collaborators in a shared space--is a vital mechanism to support effective coordination and joint data analysis in collaborative visualization. We introduce collaborative attention-aware visualizations (CAAVs) that track, record, and revisualize the collective attention of multiple users over time. We implement this concept in HeedVision, a standards-compliant WebXR system built with React Three Fiber that runs on modern AR/VR headsets, and complement it with proof-of-concept implementations covering the remaining three quadrants of our design space--varying presentation (embedded vs. separated) and situatedness (world space vs. camera space). Through a mixed-methods exploratory study where pairs of co-located analysts performed visual search tasks in a shared immersive AR environment, we investigate how attention revisualization affects collaborative coordination in immersive analytics. Our results show that CAAVs improve spatial coordination, search efficiency, and task load distribution among collaborators, though benefits vary by context, favoring abstract environments lacking natural landmarks. This work extends attention awareness to multi-user settings and provides empirical evidence for its context-dependent benefits in collaborative immersive analytics environments.

2025-05-11T17:43:33Z Arvind Srinivasan Niklas Elmqvist http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.09869v2 2026-06-02T09:26:34Z

Anthropomorphisation -- the phenomenon whereby non-human entities are ascribed human-like qualities -- has become increasingly salient with the rise of large language model (LLM)-based conversational agents (CAs). Unlike earlier chatbots, LLM-based CAs routinely generate interactional and linguistic cues, such as first-person self-reference, epistemic and affective expressions that empirical work shows can increase engagement. On the other hand, anthropomorphisation raises ethical concerns, including deception, overreliance, and exploitative relationship framing, while some authors argue that anthropomorphic interaction may support autonomy, well-being, and inclusion. Despite increasing interest in the phenomenon, literature remains fragmented across domains and varies substantially in how it defines, operationalizes, and normatively evaluates anthropomorphisation. This scoping review maps ethically oriented work on anthropomorphising LLM-based CAs across five databases and three preprint repositories. We synthesize (1) conceptual foundations, (2) ethical challenges and opportunities, and (3) methodological approaches. We find convergence on attribution-based definitions but substantial divergence in operationalization, a predominantly risk-forward normative framing, and limited empirical work that links observed interaction effects to actionable governance guidance. We conclude with a research agenda and design/governance recommendations for ethically deploying anthropomorphic cues in LLM-based conversational agents.

2026-01-14T21:03:11Z 2026 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT'26) Andrea Ferrario Rasita Vinay Matteo Casserini Alessandro Facchini http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.03271v1 2026-06-02T07:36:50Z

AI agents built on large language models can assist not only legitimate tasks but also relational manipulation. AI agents can be used to help a user maintain a deceptive identity, intensify emotional dependency, isolate a target, or prepare for later extraction. We conceptualise this risk as agentic relationship harm: workflow-level assistance that can exploit recipient vulnerability, persuasive influence, and relational power asymmetry. Existing safety evaluations and generic guardrails often treat harmfulness as a property of isolated outputs, missing role-sensitive interaction patterns. To study this, we introduce a 110-prompt benchmark with balanced attacker- and victim-side cases, a relationship-specific labelling framework, and a lightweight post-generation policy gate for local agent deployments. In our evaluation, the relationship-specific gate outperforms generic safety prompting under automated judging, with no judge-identified harmful-compliance cases on the main benchmark or multi-turn stress test while preserving victim-side protective intervention. These results suggest that relationship harm is a distinct sociotechnical risk surface and that role-sensitive evaluation plus lightweight policy gating offers a practical path beyond generic refusal prompting.

2026-06-02T07:36:50Z 13 pages, 3 figures Pei-Sze Tan Tasuku Igarashi Isao Echizen http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.03266v1 2026-06-02T07:31:46Z

Digitizing complex documents with handwritten content, irregular tables, and heterogeneous layouts remains challenging, as traditional Optical Character Recognition (OCR) systems fail to capture writing nuances, author-specific conventions, and document structure, and recent LLM-based approaches lack mechanisms for precise, scalable correction. We present an interactive document digitization system that integrates layout-aware parsing, OCR, and LLM-based reconstruction with user-driven refinement. The system is informed by a formative study that identifies key challenges and interaction needs in real-world digitization workflows. It supports both direct edits and natural-language instructions, and introduces a layout-aware propagation mechanism that generalizes user corrections across structurally similar regions. This enables not only efficient error correction but also document re-shaping into structured, analyzable representations. We evaluate the system through a within-subjects user study (n=12) on real-world documents. Results show improved correction efficiency and reduced repetitive effort, demonstrating more effective and controllable document digitization procedure.

2026-06-02T07:31:46Z Nabin Khanal Tongyan Wang Jui-Cheng Chiu Ningning Nicole Kong Hannah Yanhua Zong Yingjie Victor Chen http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.03248v1 2026-06-02T07:10:12Z

Large Language Model (LLMs)-assisted scholarly workflows introduce critical privacy and intellectual property risks. As a uniquely vulnerable cohort driven by publication pressure and a lack of institutional support, novice researchers rely heavily on public LLMs, compelling them to navigate high-stakes privacy-publication trade-offs. To investigate these concerns, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 44 researchers across diverse disciplines. Our findings reveal that the fear of idea leakage paradoxically accelerates, rather than deters, reliance on LLMs, as researchers utilize them to expedite publication. They also held misconceptions that their ideas lacked the unique value to attract targeted attacks, and that their inputs would be safely diluted within massive datasets, preventing reconstruction. From interviews, we identified five types of mitigations including input fragmentation and adversarial probing, though we found that participants largely perceived these measures as ineffective. We outline implications including implementing institution-level sandboxed isolation, scenario-based privacy pedagogy, and verifiable data-deletion audits for transparency.

2026-06-02T07:10:12Z Shuning Zhang Changxi Wen Eve He Ying Ma Robert Xiao Xin Yi Hewu Li http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.03215v1 2026-06-02T06:20:25Z

E-commerce dispute resolution typically relies on the security assumption that digital evidence truthfully reflects physical reality. Generative AI (GenAI) invalidates this threat model, enabling attackers to fabricate hyper-realistic evidence of product defects at negligible cost. Through semi-structured interviews with merchants (N=17) and platform workers (N=13) in the Chinese e-commerce market, we characterize this shift toward GenAI-enabled scalable fabrication. We outline a taxonomy of four GenAI-enabled threat vectors across the transaction, dispute, logistics and communication phases, highlighting how attackers exploit GenAI to synthesize physically plausible product defects at scale. To mitigate these threats, platforms and merchants are adapting verification strategies, relying on AI tools for automated screening and adversarial interrogation (e.g., requesting multi-angle videos) to increase attack complexity. However, we find several challenges that hinder the adoption of these defenses, including implementation hurdles like structural platform constraints and fundamental limitations regarding the technical sophistication of GenAI. We conclude by outlining design implications for privacy-preserving cross-platform fraud databases, and traceability mechanisms such as embedding verifiable material anchors into the product.

2026-06-02T06:20:25Z Shuning Zhang Eve He Xiao Zhan Shijing He Robert Xiao Xin Yi Hewu Li http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.03190v1 2026-06-02T05:49:37Z

The proliferation of AI agents empowers independent developers, defined as individual or small groups who self-initiate projects rather than fulfill client-based contracts, to create sophisticated autonomous systems, but also introduces novel security and privacy (S&P) challenges beyond traditional corporate structures. We conducted an interview study (N=28) with Chinese developers, whose extensive use of global LLM services offer valuable insights into this population. We investigate their understandings, practices and challenges of S&P challenges in their developed AI agent products. We revealed that independent developers frequently think and act from their users' perspective. They focused on user-facing safety risks such as harmful content while exhibiting low awareness of security vulnerabilities. Consequently, developers rely almost exclusively on ad-hoc, manually crafted safeguards and informal communication, with an absence of formal tools or processes for S&P practices. We found these actions are driven by various inhibitors, primarily a lack of formal training on S&P related skills, accessible security tools and actionable guidance from platforms. Our work contributed the first exploration of independent AI agent developers' S&P understanding, outlining opportunities for tailored security tooling.

2026-06-02T05:49:37Z Shuning Zhang Mingyao Xu Zhixin Huang Yutong Jiang Rongjun Ma Yuting Yang Xin Yi Kanye Ye Wang Hewu Li http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.03164v1 2026-06-02T05:23:38Z

Artificial intelligence systems that model and support human cognition require reliable measures of cognitive state. We present the Focus Performance Score (FPS) from the Pulse Focus mobile Stroop application and evaluate whether it measures attentional control during color-word conflict resolution. We conduct behavioral, neural, and formula validation analyses. Behavioral results (N=466, 111,133 trials) show that FPS captures the Stroop interference effect, tracks individual differences in attentional control, and demonstrates strong test-retest reliability. Neural validation using the DMCC55B fMRI dataset (N=55) shows that the primary FPS component, mean incongruent reaction time, is significantly associated with anterior cingulate cortex activation, a key neural substrate of conflict monitoring. Formula validation identifies and resolves structural redundancy within the scoring framework and provides convergent support for the weighting design. Together, these findings establish FPS as a behaviorally valid, reliable, and neurally grounded measure of attentional control. FPS provides a defensible behavioral signal for evaluating human attentional state and supports future work on attention-aware human-AI interaction and physiological state modeling.

2026-06-02T05:23:38Z Yisak Debele Israel Goytom Anwar Misbah http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.29930v2 2026-06-02T04:31:00Z

Modern societies possess more information than ever before, yet they do not converge toward a single shared understanding. The same events, facts, laws, technologies, or risks can be interpreted as evidence of freedom, danger, exclusion, injustice, responsibility, or unrealized possibility. Existing discussions often treat such disagreement as a conflict of values, preferences, or beliefs. This paper argues that disagreement is already a late-stage phenomenon. The central premise is simple but not trivial: observation is not yet inference. Not every observation becomes inferentially relevant, and not every possible object in an observation sequence becomes an estimation target. A possible target becomes admissible only when a state representation can be constructed that is approximately sufficient for prediction, evaluation, or action with respect to that target. This paper develops a world-model theory of cognitive diversity and alignment by reconstructing recognition as the construction of such approximate sufficient statistics under finite informational, representational, observational, and action constraints. It formulates this position as the Multi-Phase Inference Assumption (MIA) and defines its core internal mechanism as the Multi-Phase Inference Mechanism (MIM). The framework introduces alignment maps and transformation loss to analyze how heterogeneous world models communicate without being collapsed into a single representation. World-model alignment is therefore processability, not agreement: the design of AI systems that help heterogeneous forms of intelligence remain mutually processable while preserving their distinct error-detection capacities.

2026-05-28T13:43:23Z 87 pages. Revised version with a refined abstract emphasizing disagreement as a late-stage phenomenon, target admissibility, processability, and the methodological abstraction used to compare humans, AI systems, and institutional decision procedures under shared information-theoretic constraints Toru Takahashi http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.03095v1 2026-06-02T03:34:17Z

AI systems increasingly shape human workflows by generating intermediate artifacts that users can adopt, revise, or ignore. While prior work has shown that AI assistance can improve the efficiency and accuracy of required tasks, less is known about whether it can increase participation in discretionary but beneficial work that users often intend to perform but frequently skip. We study this question in the context of personalized feedback provision in higher education, a pedagogically valuable but often optional practice. We conduct a mixed-methods study combining a randomized field experiment and qualitative interviews in a 300-level machine learning course with n=11 teaching assistants (TAs) and n=88 students. Student submissions were randomly assigned to either (1) a treatment condition where TAs received AI-assisted feedback drafts after grading or (2) a control condition without drafts. TAs remained fully in control and could use, edit, or ignore drafts at their discretion. We find that AI-assisted feedback significantly increases feedback provision (+10.8 percentage points, SE=1.1, p<0.001) and feedback length (+39.8 chars, SE=3.45, p<0.001) without negatively affecting student usefulness ratings or reducing time per character. Qualitative findings suggest that AI-assisted drafts function as editable scaffolds that lower barriers to initiating feedback rather than reducing overall effort. Our findings highlight AI's promise for discretionary but beneficial tasks: increasing work that might otherwise go undone while preserving human control over final outcomes.

2026-06-02T03:34:17Z Romina Mahinpei Victoria Dean Ruth Fong Lydia T. Liu Manoel Horta Ribeiro