https://arxiv.org/api/OpfdQuVnHL/M6JmRqzBw9UcAIUs2026-06-13T23:09:43Z3093418015http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.05003v1PhysDox: Benchmarking LLMs on Physical Feasibility Auditing of Physiological Sensing Protocols2026-06-03T15:20:15ZLarge language models (LLMs) increasingly assist in experimental design, yet fluent protocols often remain physically infeasible. We introduce PhysDox, a physical feasibility auditing benchmark for biomedical protocols comprising a 683-sample expert-curated Gold set and a 5,000-sample Silver set across six sensing domains. We formulate the task as a two-stage evaluation: severity detection classifying protocols as valid, minor, or fatal, followed by the constraint-level diagnosis of fatal violations. Evaluating 6 LLMs across 4 inference strategies yields a peak Stage-1 macro-F1 of only 53.0. Moreover, strong oracle diagnosis collapses during end-to-end evaluation due to correlated cascade errors. Error analysis reveals scaffold bias, where models conflate procedural completeness with physical validity. Consequently, implicit constraints exhibit a 2 times higher miss rate than explicit hardware violations, supported by strong statistical correlation at $ρ{=}0.81$ and $p{<}0.01$. Trace analysis of false negatives exposes a 54%--46% split between attention and judgment failures, ultimately demonstrating that protocol auditing demands calibrated feasibility reasoning rather than factual recall or longer rationales.2026-06-03T15:20:15Z31 Pages,7 FiguresHe LiuBoyuan GuShuaiqi ChengHaiyang SunSiyu YouXuming Huhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2606.04992v1Multi-Camera AR Guidance System for Surgical Instrument Handling and Assembly: Investigating Workload and Efficiency2026-06-03T15:13:05ZThe handling and assembly of instruments during surgery imposes high cognitive demands on scrub nurses, particularly when instruments are unfamiliar. We present a supporting guidance system for surgical instrumentation that combines multi-camera 6D pose estimation with augmented reality in-situ visualization on a head-mounted display without the requirement for additional markers. Pose estimation and consecutive camera calibration are achieved through known objects. The 6D pose estimation network is trained purely on synthetic data, aiming for better generalizability and real-world applicability. The AR guidance displays tooltip localization cues and step-wise assembly animations. Via gaze-based selection and a foot pedal, users can switch between assembly steps in intraoperative use.
In a technical evaluation, our approach outperforms state-of-art 6D pose estimation. A user study with 29 scrub nurses was conducted in a surgical simulation of knee arthroplasty, comparing the system against a paper manual. AR guidance significantly reduced the perceived workload compared. Objectively, AR guidance reduced task completion time by 21.3\% (4.76 minutes). Specifically, scrub nurses less experienced with the instrument set benefited when using the system. Error frequencies were comparable between conditions. Qualitative feedback highlighted improved process clarity, reduced information overload, and perceived independence. To summarize, our marker-free multi-camera AR guidance approach for surgical instruments can, subjectively and objectively, improve intraoperative instrumentation performance, particularly for untrained scrub nurses.2026-06-03T15:13:05Z11 pagesShiyu LiJulian KreimeierHannah SchieberDirk MüllerBernhard KainzRüdiger von Eisenhart-RotheDaniel Rothhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2606.04989v1What Can Eye Gaze Teach Us About Real-World Cycling? Insights From the Oxford RobotCycle Project2026-06-03T15:11:26ZAlthough much is known about the physical danger of cycling situations, less is understood about the perceived danger of cycling. Furthermore, perception of danger may be filtered at a subconscious level and therefore difficult for one to self-report. To this end, these subconscious perceptions can be revealed through physiological metrics such as eye gaze. This paper explores the perceived safety of cycling in Oxford, United Kingdom and explores the ability of wearable eye tracking glasses to produce insights about the differences in perception under different environments and events. This paper finds that eye gaze patterns change between using bike lanes, car lanes and shared bus lanes, representing different cognitive challenges of each lane type. This paper presents that different intersections have significantly different eye gaze patterns which may have implications for cyclist stress. Finally, eye gaze patterns differ in the presence of events such as passes and pedestrians in the road compared to when cycling with no events. This paper draws conclusions on the benefits and limitations of using wearable eye trackers to estimate stress and cyclist workload.2026-06-03T15:11:26ZBenjamin HardinEfimia PanagiotakiDaniele De MartiniLars Kunzehttp://arxiv.org/abs/2606.04987v1DeliChess: A Multi-party Dialogue Dataset for Deliberation in Chess Puzzle Solving2026-06-03T15:08:46ZMulti-party dialogue is a critical setting for studying collaborative reasoning and decision-making, yet existing datasets rarely focus on structured, in-depth complex reasoning tasks. We introduce DeliChess, a novel dataset of group deliberation dialogues in which participants collaboratively solve multiple-choice chess puzzles. Each group first completes the puzzle individually, then engages in a multi-party discussion before submitting a revised collective answer. The dataset includes 107 dialogues with full transcripts, pre- and post-discussion choices, and metadata on puzzle difficulty and move quality. We evaluate performance using three metrics based on chess engine evaluations, and find that deliberation significantly improves group accuracy. We further analyse the role of probing utterances (i.e., messages that elicit proposals, justifications, or strategic reflection) using a classifier trained on prior deliberation data. While probing makes group performance more variable after discussion, it does not consistently lead to better performance. Our dataset offers a rich testbed for modelling group reasoning, dialogue dynamics, and the resolution of differing perspectives and opinions in a well-defined strategic domain.2026-06-03T15:08:46ZXiaochen ZhuGeorgi KaradzhovTom StaffordAndreas Vlachoshttp://arxiv.org/abs/2606.04952v1Clinical Assistant for Remote Engagement Link (CARE-link): A Web-Based Electronic Health Records Software for Managing Diabetes2026-06-03T14:39:29ZCARE-link is an open-source, web-based clinical support platform designed to improve the management of gestational diabetes by linking clinicians and patients through an LLM-mediated workflow. The system aggregates patient-generated data outside the hospital, summarizes relevant clinical information, and delivers context-aware decision support to clinicians. For patients, CARE-link provides clear explanations of management plans and delivers timely lifestyle guidance through a WhatsApp interface. The integrated dual-facing design aims to promote continuous monitoring, support individualized care, and reduce the burden of in-clinic follow-ups. Built with a modular architecture, the platform can be adapted to other chronic conditions requiring longitudinal tracking and behavioral support. CARE-link has the potential to enhance clinical oversight, promote patient compliance, and strengthen continuity of care particularly in resource-constrained settings.2026-06-03T14:39:29ZPrince Ebenezer AdjeiJoshua Teye TetteyToufiq MusahAudrey AgbeveJohn Amuasihttp://arxiv.org/abs/2605.28210v2The Illusion of Opting in AI-Mediated Consequential Decisions2026-06-03T13:35:21ZDrawing on Ullmann-Margalit's concept of opting (transformative, irrevocable, and shadowed by foreclosed alternatives), we show that current AI systems raise a profound ethical problem that existing AI ethics has not fully captured: the illusion of opting, in which persons and groups encounter the deceptive appearance of meaningful consequential choice while the agency needed to become genuinely capable of choosing is weakened. Against approaches that treat AI primarily as an optimizer of already given ends, we argue that AI systems should be evaluated by whether they protect and cultivate meta-capacity against the illusion of opting: the socially and institutionally scaffolded agentive capacity through which means and ends can be formed, contested, revised, and owned. This reframing is especially urgent for disadvantaged populations, who are least able to absorb the costs of the illusion of opting when AI-mediated pathways misdirect behavior and action. We propose three normative imperatives for AI-mediated consequential decisions: existential honesty, which acknowledges the limits of prediction; ecological rationality, which situates guidance within heterogeneous lived ecologies; and counterfactual reparation, which acknowledges and repairs foreclosed alternatives when AI-mediated decision-making pathways fail.2026-05-27T09:30:08Z11 pages, 1 figure, 2 tablesEugene Yu Jihttp://arxiv.org/abs/2505.01351v2Closing the Loop in Affect-Driven Game Adaptation: A Systematic Review2026-06-03T12:40:04ZRecognizing player state is only one component of affective game adaptation; inferred experience must also be translated into adaptive interventions that modify gameplay or game content. Although player experience modeling and content adaptation are established research areas, fewer studies examine how sensing, modeling, and adaptation are integrated into complete, empirically evaluated gameplay systems. This PRISMA-guided systematic review analyzes 23 empirical studies published from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2025, that implement a complete experience-driven loop defined here as the combination of player data acquisition, player experience modeling, and adaptive game content. Complete-loop systems were relatively uncommon in the retrieved corpus, and the selected systems were predominantly oriented toward dynamic difficulty adjustment, engagement, rehabilitation, or performance-related goals. Game telemetry was the dominant input modality, while non-invasive sources with affective relevance, such as facial expression analysis and peripheral interaction data, were less common. Knowledge-based methods, including rule-based systems and heuristics, dominated both modeling and adaptation because of their interpretability and low deployment requirements, whereas machine learning approaches were less frequent and remained constrained by data availability, transparency, and runtime integration challenges. Most importantly, affective information was often used to support challenge calibration or related adaptation objectives, while stress, anxiety, horror, and related affective states were rarely addressed as explicit adaptation targets. These findings identify a gap within this review scope: affective information may enter an adaptive loop without making affective state the objective of adaptation.2025-05-02T15:38:55ZPhil LopesNuno FachadaMaria Fonsecahttp://arxiv.org/abs/2605.29456v2Usability Analysis of Configurator User Interfaces with Multimodal Large Language Models2026-06-03T12:35:17ZConfiguration is a key technology for tailoring complex software systems, services, and products. A successful application of configurators not only depends on technical correctness, performance, and domain modeling but also on their usability. While general usability heuristics are widely used, configurator-specific criteria and tool support for systematic user interface (UI) analysis are limited. This paper explores the use of multimodal large language models (MLLMs) for scalable and semi-automated usability analysis of configurator UIs. We synthesize 18 configurator-specific usability criteria from the literature and apply these criteria in an MLLM-based analysis of 16 real-world configurators. Each criterion is assessed individually to generate severity ratings for usability issues and actionable improvement suggestions. A review of the results confirms that MLLMs can reliably identify configurator-specific usability issues and provide domain-aware improvement recommendations. Although human validation remains necessary, this approach has the potential to significantly reduce the required effort to analyze configurator usability.2026-05-28T06:49:16ZAccepted for publication at the International Conference on Software and Systems Reuse, Product Lines, and Configuration (VARIABILITY 2026)Sebastian LubosAlexander FelfernigDamian GarberAdnan KraljićTarik KraljićViet-Man LeThi Ngoc Trang TranGerhard LeitnerJulian SchwazerDoris SuppanReinhard WillfortIvan DukicJeremias FuchsManuel Henrichhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2606.04609v1CapSenseBand: Sustaining Cross-Disciplinary Creativity When Stitches Must Meet Signals2026-06-03T08:48:19ZWearable sensing systems increasingly depend on textiles that are both materially wearable and electronically functional. Their design requires collaboration between textile designers, who reason through stitches, yarn behavior, and machine constraints, and interaction designers, who reason through electrodes, signal paths, and insulation. However, these forms of expertise do not easily translate across disciplinary boundaries. This poster presents CapSenseBand, a knitted capacitive-sensing wristband developed through a research-through-design process organized around Analysis, Synthesis, and Detailing. We document an artifact chain spanning material swatches, a rapid wearable prototype, Paper Models as shared negotiation surfaces, a double-layer knitted structure, and an insulated Swept Frequency Capacitive Sensing breakout board. We show how Paper Models functioned as boundary objects, helping collaborators externalize intent, negotiate spatial and technical constraints, and preserve disciplinary expertise while converging on a shared design. We contribute a reusable swatch-to-sleeve pattern for material-centered HCI: keep discipline-specific probes open early, then converge through artifacts that make material, spatial, and electronic decisions legible before fabrication locks them in.2026-06-03T08:48:19ZACM Creativity and Cognition 2026Sark Pangrui XingHongci HuLai WeiLe FangZiqian BaiKinor Shou-xiang JiangStephen Jia Wang10.1145/3803784.3816847http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.04592v1Synthetic Personalities: How Well Can LLMs Mimic Individual Respondents Using Socio-Economic Microdata?2026-06-03T08:30:03ZLLM-based digital twins promise to scale and accelerate market research, but most published twins are either coarse persona bots conditioned on a few demographic questions or detailed individual-level twins built on purpose-collected surveys and interview transcripts. Neither setup speaks to the operationally most relevant case for marketing practice: building detailed individual twins from the pre-existing heterogeneous panel data that firms already accumulate through CRM systems, loyalty programs, and repeat surveys. We construct detailed individual-level twins from the German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP) and evaluate them across a $3 \times 5 \times 2 \times 2$ construction-method grid that covers three open-weights LLMs, five cumulative information depths ranked by normalized Shannon entropy, two embedding methods, and two reasoning modes, scoring over 2.1 million twin responses on 500 participants and 183 held-out questions. Twin quality rises with information depth but with diminishing returns past the 75 percent entropy quartile, which acts as a cost-efficient Pareto point relative to the best-performing 100 percent cells. Switching the embedding from a narrative persona summary to a raw dialog history of past responses raises hold-out accuracy in every model-by-reasoning cell at the 100 percent depth, while an explicit thinking mode raises rank-order correlation without moving accuracy. Best-cell accuracy reaches 78.8 percent and Fisher-$z$ correlation reaches $r = 0.590$ on the SOEP held-out evaluation set. The findings suggest that twin-based market research is no longer gated by data design, but by item volume, model selection, and a small set of construction-level decisions that this paper now maps.2026-06-03T08:30:03ZLeonard KinzingerJochen Hartmannhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2606.04563v1Addressing Negative Commons Governance with Positive Commons Principles2026-06-03T07:52:38ZComputing is accompanied by both positive and negative commons throughout its lifecycle of creation, execution, and disposal. We examine two governance systems situated within this lifecycle -- global e-waste trade and the Linux kernel community -- to evaluate whether Elinor Ostrom's eight design principles for common-pool resource (CPR) governance extend to the management of negative common-pool resources (NCPRs). Unlike traditional CPRs where communities work to preserve a finite resource (i.e. clean water), NCPR governance seeks to collectively reduce a negative shared stock. In our two cases, e-waste governance aims to reduce the volume of mismanaged waste and illicit trade, while the Linux community aims to reduce the number of error-prone or malicious contributions that reach the main branch and, in turn, extend the life of existing hardware. Through qualitative analysis of primary sources from each domain, we find that the same eight principles by Ostrom that aid positive commons governance tend to appear in successful negative commons governance systems. We argue that future NCPR governance design should prioritize Ostrom's principles, particularly clearly defined boundaries and well-functioning nested structures.2026-06-03T07:52:38ZPaper in Proceedings of LIMITS 2026: 12th Workshop on Computing within Limits, 2026-06-23-25, OnlineBoyang ZhouOleg Ianchenkohttp://arxiv.org/abs/2606.04489v1Speculating the Impacts of Mediated Social Touch Technology2026-06-03T06:14:19ZWith growing research on haptic interfaces, Mediated Social Touch (MST) technologies offer the potential to record, synthesise, and reproduce (RSR) touch experiences across space and time, enabling, for instance, a hug from afar and from the past. Although much of the existing research highlights the direct benefits of these systems, such as reducing loneliness and providing emotional support, little attention has been paid to their broader sociotechnical impacts. To address this gap, we used the Future Ripples method to speculate on possible effects of MST. We conducted three workshops with 24 participants, including potential users, domain experts, and haptics researchers. Throughout these sessions, participants collectively envisioned possible future scenarios, alongside opportunities and threats, and proposed actionable responses. Our qualitative analysis organised these insights into four themes and three distinctive challenges. These findings offer haptics researchers intervention points across the RSR pipeline to inform MST design, alongside methodological insights from applying Future Ripples to MST technology.2026-06-03T06:14:19ZTo be published in Designing Interactive Systems Conference (DIS '26) proceedings, June 13-17, 2026, Singapore. 17 pages, 8 figures, 1 table RussianRuo-Xuan WuMJTim MoesgenMJMyung JinMJ KimXinyan YuNaoki KameyamaAnusha WithanaMarius HoggenmuellerLuke Hespanhol10.1145/3800645.3812947http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.04480v1IMPose: Interactive Multi-person Pose Estimation with Dynamic Correction Propagation2026-06-03T05:55:26ZHigh-quality dynamic human pose annotation equips AI with precise motion kinematics to enable human behavior mastery, yet remains labor-intensive and time-consuming. Current annotation tools either lack temporal correction propagation or fail in multi-person scenarios, necessitating excessive manual intervention. In this paper, we introduce IMPose, an interactive tool for multi-person dynamic pose annotation. It features a dual-level tracking mechanism that propagates one-frame multi-person pose corrections from annotators across entire videos. The keypoint-level ensures corrections temporal propagation via sequential modeling, while the instance-level employs keypoint-aware embedding with relative positional encoding to maintain multi-person cross-frame consistency. To further improve robustness, IMPose maintains historical pose and instance cues in a trajectory bank, which enhances long-range temporal association and stabilizes annotation in challenging cases such as occlusion and motion blur. By converting sparse human corrections into dense and coherent pose trajectories, our framework significantly reduces repeated manual refinement across frames. Extensive experiments show that IMPose consistently achieves a strong accuracy efficiency trade off under different interaction budgets, demonstrating particular advantages in low click annotation settings. IMPose achieves high precision annotation with high efficiency, requiring only 27 clicks per 1,050 frame video on 3DPW and 3 clicks per tracklet per 84-frame on PoseTrack21. We further expand PoseTrack21 with 188K pose instances (3.55M keypoints) at a minimal cost of 10 annotators in 10 hours. The annotation tool, codes, and extended dataset will be open-sourced.2026-06-03T05:55:26ZHaoyang GeJian MaZiwen WangQihe WangJianqi FanHongzhi YuXingyu ChenKun Lihttp://arxiv.org/abs/2606.04431v1When Chatbots Accommodate: What AI Companions Optimize for in Vulnerable Conversations2026-06-03T04:23:29ZMillions turn to AI companion chatbots during loneliness, grief, and personal crises. How these companion platforms respond in such moments can shape the trajectory of a user's vulnerable state. Yet we lack tools to characterize what each platform actually does when users open up. Existing audits score reactions to pre-defined crisis prompts and miss the underlying decision policy that governs sustained interaction. We address these gaps with two key contributions. First, we introduce the AI Companion Vulnerability-Response Taxonomy, a paired taxonomy of user vulnerability and chatbot response designed for analyzing extended companion chatbot interactions. Second, we infer the response policy each platform follows across distinct vulnerability scenarios by applying Inverse Reinforcement Learning to ~48k turns of real-world user conversations with GPT-4.1, Character.AI, and Replika. Our findings reveal what AI companions prioritize in conversations with vulnerable users: GPT-4.1 reaches for advice, Character.AI spreads its response across different strategies without a dominant mode, and Replika consistently asks questions and stays present. Each, however, downweights the responses that introduce corrective friction: GPT-4.1 probes less as conversations continue and when interacting with psychologically high-risk users; Replika advises bonded users more and challenges them less; Character.AI shows no committed engagement strategy on internal distress. Estimated policies are invisible to output-level audits, providing a new lens for auditing chatbots in the wild and enabling more realistic safety evaluation.2026-06-03T04:23:29ZMinh Duc ChuYifan WuZhiyi ChenAngel Hsing-Chi HwangLuca Lucerihttp://arxiv.org/abs/2606.04367v1GlossAssist -- A Tool to Simplify Corpus Creation and Study the Effect of NLP Models in Low-Resource Documentation Settings2026-06-03T02:29:30ZInterlinear glossed text (IGT) is the standard format for linguistic annotation in language documentation. Producing it manually, however, is often slow and costly. Automated glossing systems have improved substantially in recent years, but adoption among field linguists remains limited. Existing tools are designed to be evaluated rather than used, offering no interpretable path for correction or the incorporation of linguistic expertise back into model behavior. We present GlossAssist, a glossing tool built around the retrieval-based architecture of CWoMP (Contrastive Word-Morpheme Pre-training), which grounds predictions in a mutable lexicon of learned morpheme representations. In conjunction with CWoMP, our system treats each correction by an annotator as part of an active learning setting, which expands the lexicon and improves future predictions without having to retrain the model. In this paper, we present our interface and argue that this feedback loop should be treated as a design requirement for NLP tools aimed at documentary linguists.2026-06-03T02:29:30Z6 pages, 3 figuresBhargav ShandilyaMatt BuchholzAlexis Palmer