Cohort-based Semantic Labeling: AI-Enabled Recovery of Visualization Semantics from Deployed SVGs

2026-06-08T17:40:53Z

Many web-based visualizations are deployed as Scalable Vector Graphics (SVG), a format that faithfully preserves visual appearance but typically omits the higher-level semantic structure needed for machine interpretation. Once rendered and published, information about a visualization's components, roles, and encodings is no longer explicitly available, limiting downstream operations such as querying, accessibility augmentation, explanation, personalization, and transformation. To address this gap, we introduce CSL, an AI-enabled, multi-stage pipeline for automatically recovering visualization semantics from deployed SVGs through two complementary mechanisms: (1) cohort-based decomposition, which organizes heterogeneous SVG primitives into structurally coherent subsets that reduce the semantic assignment space, and (2) hybrid semantic grounding, which combines model-based inference with deterministic structural validation and propagation to make labeling both context-sensitive and structurally anchored. CSL produces Semantic SVG (SSVG), a representation in which SVG elements are annotated with graphical mark type, visualization role, and data role. We implemented CSL as an end-to-end prototype and evaluated it on 102 SVG visualizations, achieving global macro-averaged accuracies of 0.822 for mark type, 0.853 for visualization role, and 0.860 for data-role recovery. An ablation against a non-cohort whole-chart baseline showed that cohorting significantly improves accuracy (paired t-test: t > 20, p < 0.001; Cohen's d > 2.0), and repeated labeling of a randomly selected SVG over 100 runs yielded mean agreement above 91.9% across all three attributes. These results provide strong evidence that CSL can transform deployed SVGs into machine-usable semantic representations, enabling more accessible, adaptive, and user-steerable visualization systems.

Collaborative Human-Agent Protocol (CHAP)

2026-06-08T17:11:42Z

Foundation models are moving from response generation into operational roles. They plan across steps, call tools, request human input, coordinate with other agents, and increasingly carry responsibility for work that affects customers, claims, code, contracts, and clinical decisions. Production deployments are no longer one human supervising one model. They are multi-human, multi-agent collaborations that cross teams, time zones, and trust boundaries. The technical surface for this collaboration remains weakly specified. When an agent drafts a response and a human edits it before it ships, the moment of human judgement is the most valuable signal in the system. In current practice it is recorded, if at all, in application code, chat threads, ticket comments, and tribal memory. Two protocol standards address adjacent concerns: MCP standardises agent access to tools and data, and A2A standardises agent-to-agent interoperability. Neither defines the shared workspace in which humans and agents perform accountable work together. This paper presents CHAP, the Collaborative Human-Agent Protocol. Under CHAP, the override that used to vanish into a chat thread becomes a structured event carrying a diff, a rationale, and a content hash. The handoff between shifts becomes a portable envelope rather than a pinned message. The human approval of an agent's draft becomes a non-repudiable signed decision that can be replayed years later. The protocol achieves this through a small Core (workspaces, participants, tasks, artefacts, and an append-only evidence log) together with composable profiles that add review, modes, routing, deliberation, handoff, identity, signatures, and transparency-backed audit as deployments require them. Specification, reference implementation, conformance suite, and worked examples are available at: https://github.com/BrightbeamAI/chap

What the Eyes See, the LLMs Miss: Exploiting Human Perception for Adversarial Text Attacks

2026-06-08T16:21:34Z

Large language model (LLM)-powered content moderation systems have become a critical defense against harmful online content. However, these systems primarily operate on tokenized text and largely ignore the visual cues that humans naturally rely on when interpreting content. We show that this discrepancy creates a fundamental perceptual mismatch: content that is readily recognized as harmful by humans can become effectively invisible to automated moderation systems. To study this vulnerability, we introduce a class of Human-Perceptible Adversarial Attacks (HPAA), in which harmful expressions are embedded into otherwise benign text through visually salient typographic manipulations. Our key insight is that typographic features, including spacing, visual emphasis, and spatial arrangement, can be strategically combined to preserve human recognition of harmful content while substantially reducing machine detectability. Operating in black-box settings with only a small query budget, our attack automatically generates evasive content without requiring model access or gradient information. We evaluate the attack across multiple datasets and ten deployed moderation systems, including commercial APIs and state-of-the-art open-source guardrails. Results reveal a striking gap between human and machine perception: with only three detector queries, generated attacks achieve over 86\% human recognition while maintaining detection rates below 1\% across the evaluated systems. We further conduct ablation studies to identify the typographic factors driving successful evasion, analyze why current moderation architectures fail to capture these signals, and discuss practical defenses. Our findings expose a fundamental blind spot in today's LLM-based moderation ecosystem and highlight need for moderation systems that reason about content in a manner more consistent with human perceptual understanding.

Seeing the Hivemind: A Consensus-Aware Interaction Technique for Mitigating AI Homogenization

2026-06-08T14:59:50Z

People are increasingly using AI for creative tasks such as writing. While adoption continues to grow, this form of use risks undermining individual creativity locally and reducing the heterogeneity of creative output at scale. In response, we introduce the Semantic Repulsion Technique (SRT) and evaluate it both computationally and through a study with 16 participants who regularly use AI for creative tasks. Our computational assessment reveals that SRT increases semantic diversity by 85--167\% while reducing consensus phrases by 43--95\% across task modes. In the user study, SRT outputs received higher usefulness ($p = .019$, $W = .208$) and coherence ratings ( $p = .006$, $W = .260$); 68.8\% of participants were willing to use SRT-Strong for multiple tasks versus 18.8\% for baselines. Originality and coherence ratings were positively correlated across all systems ($ρ= +.40$ to $+.67$), suggesting that divergence need not compromise readability. Taken together, these preliminary findings can inform the design of AI systems that aim to support everyday creativity without contributing to homogenization.

UXBench: Benchmarking User Experience in AI Assistants

2026-06-08T14:44:01Z

As AI assistants serve millions of users daily, evaluating user experience (UX) beyond general model capability has become increasingly important. We present UXBench, the first user-centric benchmark grounded in real user feedback signals for evaluating preference alignment and dialogue generation. The benchmark consists of three interconnected tasks, UX Judge, UX Eval, and UX Recovery, with 7,400 test instances extracted from over 70K interaction logs of a mainstream Chinese AI assistant. The dataset closely reflects real user distributions, covering 8 scenarios, 83 domains, and diverse failure patterns that pose severe challenges. Extensive experiments on 26 frontier language models provide novel insights into how well models perceive user experience and how improvements in model capability contribute to better dialogue engagement. Through comprehensive analysis of model behavior and performance gaps, we show that user feedback prediction is a learnable capability, where a reward model trained from in-the-wild feedback signals can achieve well-calibrated accuracy. We further document the systematic biases of LLM-as-a-judge evaluation protocols and compare typical response strategies that directly affect user experience. UXBench establishes a new evaluation landscape and calls for greater attention to tailored UX optimization, contributing to a user-centric scaling law that shapes the success of AI assistants.

Empirical assessment of ChatGPT's answering capabilities in natural science and engineering

2026-06-08T13:33:25Z

ChatGPT is a powerful language model from OpenAI that is arguably able to comprehend and generate text. ChatGPT is expected to greatly impact society, research, and education. An essential step to understand ChatGPT's expected impact is to study its domain-specific answering capabilities. Here, we perform a systematic empirical assessment of its abilities to answer questions across the natural science and engineering domains. We collected 594 questions on natural science and engineering topics from 198 faculty members across five faculties at Delft University of Technology. After collecting the answers from ChatGPT, the participants assessed the quality of the answers using a systematic scheme. Our results show that the answers from ChatGPT are, on average, perceived as ''mostly correct''. Two major trends are that the rating of the ChatGPT answers significantly decreases (i) as the educational level of the question increases and (ii) as we evaluate skills beyond scientific knowledge, e.g., critical attitude.

Real-Time AttentionBender: Granular Interactive Network Bending of Video Diffusion Transformers

2026-06-08T13:17:08Z

Generative video models have achieved remarkable visual fidelity, yet their prompt-only interface offers thin creative agency and obscures the model's material process from the artists working with it. We present Real-Time AttentionBender, a tool that extends the practice of network bending across the full depth of the video diffusion transformer (DiT) and brings it into live, interactive generation. Built as a plugin within the DayDream Scope ecosystem and wrapping open-source real-time Wan pipelines, the tool exposes self-attention, cross-attention, and the feed-forward network as independently manipulable surfaces, with targeting down to individual diffusion steps, DiT layers, prompt tokens, and hidden neurons. The immediacy of live manipulation affords what we call "material intimacy" with the model: a responsive, near-mechanistic feel for how specific layers and neurons shape generated video. We position the tool as simultaneously an XAIxArts probe into transformer internals and an expressive instrument for discovering aesthetics outside the model's default representational space.

AI Assurance in UK Defence: Challenges in Operationalising JSP 936

2026-06-08T12:28:55Z

This report examines practical challenges in operationalising JSP 936 Part 1 for AI assurance in UK Defence. Using a structured interpretive review of the directive's requirements, the analysis identifies eight thematic challenge areas adequacy of evidence and argument, management of human interaction with AI, definition of the operational environment, integration of AI within systems of systems, assessment and maintenance of AI performance, analysis of safety and security, measurement of ethicality, and mitigation of the inherent complexities of AI. The report argues that JSP 936 provides a useful governance basis, but that implementation depends on unresolved technical, organisational, and assurance questions. These challenges stem from the socio-technical nature of AI-enabled systems, uncertainty in real-world deployment contexts, limitations in current assurance methodologies, and tensions between performance, safety, human oversight, security, and ethical acceptability. The report identifies areas where further methods, guidance, and organisational capability are needed for the ambitious, safe, and responsible adoption of AI across Defence. This is consistent with MOD's own framing of JSP 936 as requiring iterative implementation and supporting guidance.

Can Data Work be Reparative?

2026-06-08T12:25:35Z

We present an ethnographic study of an alternative approach to data work, developed by a civic-tech initiative that builds datasets for training and benchmarking online safety systems. They aim to respond to online safety concerns from a feminist perspective, by building safety datasets collaboratively with those most impacted by online harms. In this paper, we examine how this approach aims to reorient data work as a site for repair and redress, and trace the struggles they encounter in the process. Specifically, we draw attention to the challenges and tensions involved in advancing just reward for data work and collective governance of AI datasets. Examining these challenges through an STS-informed lens of reparative justice and repair, we argue that the work of repairing data work (and AI) lies, fundamentally, in resetting the ties of accountability. At a time heightened emphasis on efforts like safety evaluations and red teaming to make AI more responsible, we highlight the need to confront foundational questions about how the humans involved in these efforts relate to the datasets and systems they help produce. A reparative lens demands that we interrupt prevailing norms of data work and place at their centre, not AI or datasets, but those most harmed by the neglect, oversight and exclusion animated in the current modes of dataset production. This, we argue, offers a bold vision for responsibility and contributes towards a critical agenda for building alternative futures of data and AI practice.

MOOSE-Copilot: A Web-Based Interactive Assistant for Unified Exploratory and Fine-Grained Scientific Hypothesis Discovery

2026-06-08T09:20:10Z

Large language models (LLMs) show remarkable potential in scientific hypothesis discovery. However, existing approaches face two critical limitations: they treat divergent exploratory search and convergent fine-grained refinement as isolated tasks, and they operate autonomously with little to no human guidance. We present MOOSE-Copilot, the first unified framework to bridge this abstraction gap through a formalized human-AI interaction (HAII) protocol. Our system empowers scientists to steer the generative process via three explicit signals: initial blueprints, inter-stage routing, and intra-stage feedback. Using an oracle-simulated evaluation in which an LLM provides idealized expert signals, we show that injecting these structured signals significantly outperforms purely autonomous baselines, characterizing the gains achievable under high-quality guidance. Furthermore, we build a web-based interface that turns the framework into a no-code workflow: researchers pose a question, watch the hypothesis search unfold as an interactive tree, and steer it by selecting hypotheses, routing between stages, and injecting feedback-no command-line agents required. This makes end-to-end hypothesis discovery directly accessible to interdisciplinary researchers.

Conceptualising Reflective Use: Toward A Process Perspective On Human-AI Interaction

2026-06-08T09:16:37Z

The rapid diffusion of generative artificial intelligence (genAI) systems reshapes how individuals engage with information systems, requiring users to monitor, assess, and adapt their interaction with non-deterministic systems. Existing constructs capture elements of this engagement but do not account for the situated dynamics of the entire evaluative process in genAI use. This research-in-progress, situated in a larger endeavour towards a scale development, derives an initial conceptualisation of reflective use: a behavioural-knowledge capability that unfolds across pre-use, in-use, and post-use phases, reinforced through situated reflective knowledge gained in practice. Drawing on expert interviews and a focus group, we identify four core components of reflective use and show how they form an iterative capability cycle anchored within the motivational needs outlined in self-determination theory. Understanding reflective use is essential to ensure appropriate reliance and high decision quality, and thus provides a foundation for promoting responsible and effective human-AI interaction.

Orange Lab: Lowering Barriers to Data Mining through Embedded Interactive Workflows

2026-06-08T09:14:55Z

While visual programming of data analysis workflows has become an important vehicle for the democratization of data science, such systems remain largely confined to standalone applications and offer limited support for transitioning their visual analytics solutions into interactive web environments. As a result, data analysis pipelines are difficult to share, embed, and adapt into user-facing analytical tools. We present Orange Lab, a web-based collaborative environment for visual data analytics. At its core, Orange Lab enables users to visually construct machine learning workflows from modular components, where interactions in any component propagate seamlessly through the workflow, turning static pipelines into dynamic, reactive systems that support exploration and data-driven storytelling. Our key contribution is component exposition, a paradigm that allows authors to embed selected workflow components, or parts of their interfaces, into arbitrary web contexts, creating synchronized, interactive interfaces while hiding underlying workflow complexity. This enables the development of tailored analytical views and narrative-driven experiences that integrate data analysis directly into online materials. We demonstrate the approach through deployments in data literacy education, where embedded components guide students in hands-on exploration of machine learning concepts without requiring knowledge of the underlying system, showing that Orange Lab effectively lowers barriers to entry and supports the democratization of data science.

Trustworthy Smart Fabs via Professional Proxies: Scaling Safe and Sustainable by Design (SSbD) through Industrial Data Spaces

2026-06-08T09:02:02Z

The convergence of the 2026 European Union Safe and Sustainable by Design (SSbD) framework, Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD), and Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) introduce a severe governance bottleneck for advanced semiconductor manufacturing facilities ("Smart Fabs"). Regulatory compliance demands have surpassed the capacity of manual corporate reporting, creating a direct conflict between multi-stakeholder transparency and corporate data privacy. This paper addresses this challenge by introducing a zero-trust socio-technical orchestration framework that operationalizes a six-layer SSbD reference architecture within trustworthy industrial data spaces. We propose a shift from reactive automation to autonomous governance through "Professional Proxies"-role-based agentic workflows executing within hardware-isolated trust zones. Structured as an interoperable network protocol stack, the framework coordinates an automated, five-step "relay race" between Facility, Process Engineering, and Finance proxy teams to align factory-floor yield models with macro-level sustainability mandates. By executing Virtual Metrology (VM) predictions and Federated Machine Learning (FML) inside hardware-rooted Trusted Execution Environments (TEEs), this architecture resolves the Data Sovereignty Paradox, demonstrating how fabs can export cryptographically signed compliance tokens via International Data Spaces (IDS) connectors without exposing proprietary process recipes. Ultimately, this framework provides technology managers with a verifiable, evidence-based pathway toward resilient, net-zero Industry 5.0 ecosystems.

DuplexOmni: Real-Time Listening, Seeing, Thinking, and Speaking for Full-Duplex Interaction

2026-06-08T08:23:02Z

Human interaction is continuous, multimodal, and full-duplex by nature. Although recent omni models have made substantial progress in unified speech, vision, and text modeling, combining seamless real-time interaction with complex reasoning and tool use remains challenging. We present DuplexOmni, a method for real-time multimodal full-duplex interaction. DuplexOmni separates model capability into an interaction layer and a thinking layer, which collaborate asynchronously in parallel. The interaction layer is implemented by the DuplexOmni model, an end-to-end system that processes streaming audio and video inputs while generating text and speech responses in real time. The thinking layer is a pluggable module that provides complex reasoning and tool-use capabilities. To support this method, we further develop a Writer-Director pipeline for constructing continuous-interaction training data. Experiments show that DuplexOmni achieves strong performance on multiple public benchmarks and exhibits natural full-duplex interaction ability.

Demonstrating chart-plot: Closing the Last Mile of Academic Chart Generation

2026-06-08T08:09:27Z

Large language models can translate a researcher's intent into runnable matplotlib code, yet the resulting chart rarely lands in a paper without multiple rounds of manual revision. We argue that the open problem is not chart code generation but chart publication: making the output look like a top-venue figure, survive the target layout, and respond to precise author edits. We present chart-plot, an agentic harness that closes this last mile through three components: (1) a style-aware code generator conditioned on a textual style skill distilled from accepted figures at the target venue, (2) a deployment-aware render loop that compiles the chart inside the target LaTeX context and revises until layout constraints are met, and (3) a structured edit layer that exposes every chart element as a directly manipulable handle. We report early results on three chart-type case studies (grouped bar, scaling line, paired distributions) and a small user study.