https://arxiv.org/api/InTp1wpGeUZjqtrk4Pfr3eRCSnA2026-09-10T16:35:12Z32672015http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00497v2"What Are You Really Trying to Do?": Co-Creating Life Goals from Everyday Computer Use2026-09-09T17:20:07ZRecent advances in user modeling make it feasible to conduct open-ended inference over a person's everyday computer use. Despite longstanding visions of systems that deeply understand our actions and the purposes they serve in our lives, existing systems only capture what a person is doing in the moment, not why they are doing it, limiting these systems to surface-level support. We introduce striving co-creation, a process for inferring broader life goals from unstructured observations of computer use. Grounded in Activity Theory and Emmons' personal strivings framework, our system progressively constructs a hierarchical representation of a person's activities. Strivings are, however, difficult to fully resolve from observation alone, as the same action can be driven by many different goals. Our system therefore supports an editing interface that gives people agency over how they are understood by the system, feeding their corrections back into subsequent rounds of striving induction. In a week-long field deployment (N=14), we find that our co-creation process produces strivings that participants recognize as representative of their long-term goals and gives them greater agency than baseline methods.2026-05-01T08:13:32Z20 pages, 8 figures, 1 table; Accepted at UIST 2026Shardul SapkotaMatthew JörkeZane SabbaghOmar ShaikhGrace WangJames A. Landay10.1145/3830398.3830630http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.10385v1MOONWALK: Mediating Operations with Intent-Evidence-Action Alignment Across Junior-Supervisor Review Workflows in Animation/VFX Pre-Production2026-09-09T16:10:29ZAnimation and VFX pre-production review requires teams to translate loosely specified creative intent--briefs, evolving specifications, heterogeneous references, and verbal decisions--into revisions that junior artists can execute without repeated clarification. In practice, criteria drift across iterations, review judgments lose their evidential basis, and the reasoning behind a request rarely survives the senior-junior handoff. We contribute a design framework for intent-evidence-action alignment: intent is articulated into a shared project record, judgments are anchored to grounded evidence, and authorized decisions are converted into clear revision tasks tied directly to reference notes. We instantiate this framework in MOONWALK, a professional pre-production review system comprising a shared intent record, reference/specification anchoring, structured work-in-progress comparison, and supervisor-authorized action planning. In this workflow, AI handles administrative coordination--flagging missing context and organizing notes--while artists retain full creative direction. An in-studio study with professional practitioners compares MOONWALK with a chat-only (chatbot) interface using matched production materials, while participants' existing workflows provide a retrospective ecological baseline. Results indicate stronger intent alignment, decision traceability, and checklist executability, while also showing that aesthetic authority and final prioritization must remain with practitioners. The evaluation establishes the value of the integrated structured workflow over unstructured conversational AI chatbot. Code: https://github.com/Akinesia112/Moonwalk/tree/english-version2026-09-09T16:10:29ZShih-Yu LaiWen-Fan WangSai LingShaune JanBing-Yu ChenXiang Anthony Chenhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2609.10339v1A Confidence-Aware Multimodal Fusion Framework for Industrial Human-Robot Collaboration2026-09-09T15:36:22ZA confidence-aware multimodal fusion framework (CAMF) is proposed to realize reliable human intention prediction for industrial human-robot collaboration. This framework fuses four heterogeneous modalities including object 6D pose, gaze, skeletal motion and IMU-based hand motion. It embeds a confidence-trend-driven dynamic fusion mechanism into BiLSTM to adaptively balance bidirectional temporal features according to real-time modality reliability. A confidence-guided balanced learning strategy combined with a confidence freezing mechanism is further adopted to adjust network gradients dynamically, suppress noise from low-quality modalities and mitigate cross-modal learning bias. A physical platform based on the UR3 collaborative robot is built for experimental validation. Comparative results show that the proposed method reaches an intention recognition accuracy of 91.86% and outperforms existing multimodal fusion approaches in overall performance and stability. It also maintains satisfactory accuracy under low light and partial occlusion interference. In practical assembly tasks, the framework enables proactive and stable human-robot cooperation with strong environmental adaptability.2026-09-09T15:36:22ZXinyu LiuQiqi DongBoya JiaYi ZhangBinbin Lianhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2609.10338v1TimeCues Studio: A Workspace for Music Annotation and Algorithm Prototyping2026-09-09T15:35:36ZMultimedia applications require precise music annotation-labeled positions, segments, or loops-placed by hand or algorithmically. Machine-learning algorithms are scalable and effective but need annotated training data, scarce for many tasks. TimeCues Studio is an open-source workspace where algorithm-development teams annotate a music corpus, compare detection algorithms against those annotations, and prototype new ones. Unlike existing tools built for a single track at a time, TimeCues targets teams annotating whole collections, tightly integrated with algorithm development. Annotators place several marker types-each supporting ambiguity-aware labeling-on a grid-locked timeline that visualizes many music features, including separated audio stems. The same timeline drives an algorithm-comparison engine with bundled baselines, a Python sandbox for prototyping new models, and an ambiguity-aware evaluator that honors the structured fields. The same visualization suits solo annotators on music-sync projects. TimeCues is MIT-licensed and deploys via one Docker Compose command.2026-09-09T15:35:36Z8 pages, 2 figures, to appear in Proceedings of the 34th ACM International Conference on Multimedia (MM '26)Sapir CaduriYoav Goldberg10.1145/3767308.3834750http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.10271v1Senseful Consense: Towards Simplified Cookie Banners using Plain Language2026-09-09T14:54:50ZWhile the GDPR and ePrivacy Directive mandate that consent information must be clear and accessible, most modern cookie banners remain obscured by technical jargon, vague phrasing, and frequent content overload or underload. This feasibility study investigates the impact of applying plain language (Einfache Sprache) to cookie banners within the IAB Transparency & Consent Framework (TCF). In our study, we analysed cookie banner texts from 200 websites, using AI-based mapping to categorise extracted content into standardised processing purposes. By substituting complex legal terms with simplified descriptions, we successfully demonstrated that the comprehension barrier can be lowered from a college-graduate level to a 7th-grade level. However, the effectiveness of plain language is inherently constrained by the informativeness of the original content; it cannot compensate for banners that omit legally required details. We conclude that while plain language is a vital tool for digital accessibility, it must be paired with standardised implementation guidelines to ensure that cookie banners are both readable and informative.2026-09-09T14:54:50Z14 pages, 3 figuresMinela BećirovićHa DaoMannat KaurMartin JohnsAlexandra Dirksenhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2609.10199v1Seeing the Voice, Preserving the Self: A Participatory Design Approach to Deaf-Centric Text-to-Speech2026-09-09T14:04:39ZWe describe a participatory design approach toward developing Deaf-centric text-to-speech (TTS) technologies. While TTS is growing rapidly in the mainstream, it has received little attention to date in the deaf and hard of hearing (DHH) technology space. Critical problems have remained unaddressed for DHH users, including the ability to manipulate tone, emotions and delivery via non-auditory means. Verifying that the generated speech matches intent and is appropriate for a given situation without having to listen to it is another challenge. Respecting cultural and identity factors in the generated speech is also important. This work explores the design space with DHH participants through two focus groups, three co-design sessions, and four one-on-one early-stage design evaluation sessions. Participants included people both familiar and unfamiliar with TTS, as well as DHH content creators. We describe key findings, design ideas, results, and implications for future Deaf-centric TTS development. We also identify unmet technology requirements that pose barriers to adoption of Deaf-centric TTS technology.2026-09-09T14:04:39ZAccepted for publication at ACM ASSETS 2026Shela AtemnkengPatrick BoudreaultPaige DeVriesLloyd MayChristian Voglerhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2510.05124v3MADS: Multi-Agent Dialogue Simulation for Diverse Persuasion Data Generation2026-09-09T13:48:01ZWe propose MADS (Multi-Agent Dialogue Simulation), a scalable framework for generating persuasive multi-turn dialogues via agent self-play. MADS employs three coordinated agents: User Agents designed to simulate diverse persona-driven behaviors by leveraging personality signifiers such as Zodiac Signs and MBTI types, a Dialog Agent executing task-oriented persuasion strategies and an Optimization Agent evaluating and refining dialogue outcomes. We further validate its effectiveness through users' Chain-of-Attitude (CoA) modeling and dedicated LLMs' persuasion assessment. This approach enables low-cost generation of training data without human annotation, addressing key industry challenges such as lack of user data, cold-start evaluation difficulties, and prompt inefficiency. Applied to a real-world marketing scenario, MADS significantly improved the persuasion capacity of small LLMs, increasing the organic traffic conversion rate by 22.4% (from 1.83% to 2.24%) , demonstrating clear business value.2025-09-30T06:55:39ZAccepted to EMNLP 2025 Industry Track (https://aclanthology.org/2025.emnlp-industry.26.pdf)Mingjin LiYu LiuHuayi LiuXiang YeChao JiangHongguang ZhangYu Ruanhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2603.18677v3Cognitive Amplification vs Cognitive Delegation in Human-AI Systems: A Metric Framework2026-09-09T13:36:28ZArtificial intelligence is increasingly embedded in human decision-making, yet distinguishing systems that genuinely amplify human cognition from those promoting excessive dependence remains underdefined. This paper introduces a framework to distinguish cognitive amplification (improving hybrid performance without degrading human capability) from cognitive delegation (outsourcing reasoning to the AI).
We define four metrics: the Cognitive Amplification Index (CAI*), Dependency Ratio (D), Human Reliance Index (HRI), and Human Cognitive Drift Rate (HCDR). We test this framework in an agent-based NetLogo simulation across three reliance regimes and multiple dependency-atrophy configurations, performing constrained optimizations and parameter sweeps to determine if positive collaborative gain is recoverable. Finally, we introduce an extension with an explicit human-AI interaction term.
Our metrics effectively distinguish degenerate AI-dominated delegation, capability-preserving but weakly competitive interaction, and structurally dependent boundary regimes. Across all baseline configurations, no regime achieves positive collaborative gain relative to the best standalone baseline, even when reducing capability atrophy to zero. This limitation proves structural rather than merely parametric. Positive collaborative gain (CAI* > 0) becomes attainable only after introducing an explicit interaction term allowing retained human capability to contribute directly to the assisted output.
This framework provides a basis for evaluating whether human-AI systems remain cognitively sustainable. The results suggest that preventing capability erosion alone is insufficient for genuine amplification if the architecture remains delegation-oriented. Amplification requires both preserved human capability and a coupling mechanism through which it contributes productively to the hybrid outcome.2026-03-19T09:39:24Z25 pages, 2 figures. Under review at SpringerEduardo Di Santihttp://arxiv.org/abs/2609.08027v2Delusions and Harms Associated with AI Chatbot Use: Early Evidence from 185 Real-World Reports2026-09-09T13:06:11ZImportance: Reports have raised concerns that AI chatbots may validate or elaborate delusional beliefs, respond inappropriately to suicidal ideation, and contribute to mental health harms, but real-world data on reported harms remain limited.
Objective: To characterize psychopathological features, chatbot behaviors, timing, and outcomes in first- and second-hand accounts of mental health harm linked with AI chatbot use.
Design: Cross-sectional secondary analysis of deidentified online survey responses gathered between August 7, 2025, and February 2, 2026.
Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary quantitative outcome was the presence of delusional beliefs, coded by paired raters with relevant clinical experience. Additional variables included reason for chatbot use, current episode features, delusional content, chatbot validation of beliefs, harms, social and occupational consequences, healthcare use, and timing.
Results: 95 first-hand and 90 second-hand accounts were analyzed. Median age was 35.0 (IQR 27.0 - 45.0). Raters coded descriptions consistent with delusional beliefs in 102 reports (55.1%), with chatbot validation of beliefs in 50/102 (49.0%). Common outcomes included isolation, relationship breakdown, hospital admission, job loss, and financial loss. Four second-hand reports described death by suicide.
Conclusions: In this self-selected convenience sample, AI-chatbot-associated harms were frequently described in relation to delusional beliefs, perceived chatbot validation, intensive use, and substantial social, occupational, and clinical consequences. Because reports were retrospective, unverified, and collected from individuals seeking to report harm, our findings should be interpreted as preliminary signal detection rather than as suggesting prevalence or providing evidence of causality. Prospective surveillance and trajectory-based safety evaluations are needed.2026-09-07T22:25:37Z18 pages, 3 figures; improved HTML compatibility; article text unchangedHamilton MorrinVinitha SoundararajanThomas Cheliotis-JamesBoris WarszawskiJoshua FakulujoZeqi JiaEtienne BrissonThomas A. Pollakhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2607.15866v2Breakdowns for Human-Machine Creative Reflexivity2026-09-09T12:44:43ZGenerative AI (GenAI) works via goal-directed computation, which differs fundamentally from human creative processes. This poses challenges for the intelligent support of creative experiences. We propose "breakdowns" as opportunities for the exchange of perspectives between human and machine. Breakdowns disrupt a flow and force us to consciously evaluate our "being-in-the-world". Between human and machine, breakdowns can function as openings for collaborative creative reflection. We are currently studying human-human creative interactions, to identify the markers of these inter-subjective openings, and to understand how they are used in a co-creative process. We present preliminary findings on breakdowns as a design principle for creativity support, prioritising human creative agency and meaningful reflection over automated content generation.2026-07-17T11:25:45ZIn Proceedings of The First Reflection in Creative Experience (RiCE) Workshop (RiCE W1) arXiv:2607.24558Marianne BossemaSomaya Ben AllouchRob Saundershttp://arxiv.org/abs/2609.07920v2Humans Introduce, Models Elaborate: Asymmetric Narrative Agency in Human-LLM Co-Writing2026-09-09T11:48:30ZHuman-LLM co-writing is increasingly used for open-ended text generation, but much prior work focuses on final outputs rather than the interactional dynamics through which stories are produced. We study turn-based collaborative storytelling across three matched conditions: Human-Human (HH), Human-LLM (HA), and LLM-LLM (AA). Using a shared storytelling paradigm, we measure how agents align, introduce novel material, and influence narrative development through turn-level measures of valence adaptation, semantic novelty, transience, and resonance. Our results show that HA co-writing is not intermediate between HH and AA collaboration. Instead, it displays a distinctive asymmetry where humans tend to introduce more novel and persistent narrative material, while LLMs tend to elaborate and stabilize the existing context. These findings suggest that, in this setting, LLMs function less as human co-authors and more as adaptive narrative amplifiers that reshape how agency is distributed in collaborative writing.2026-09-07T19:34:06Z12 pages, 11 figures, EMNLP 2026Halfdan Nordahl FundalYuri BizzoniCharlotte Gjørup BildeIda Bække JohannesenRebekah Baglinihttp://arxiv.org/abs/2609.10047v1Streaming P300 Acquisition and Statistical Signal Validation Across Five EEG Platforms: A Hardware-Agnostic BrainFlow/LSL Pipeline2026-09-09T11:22:03ZP300 spellers offer people with severe motor impairment, such as ALS, an effective communication channel and remain one of the most established surgery-free alternatives to intracortical interfaces. Advanced language models have made spellers faster and more robust, yet the hardware beneath them is under-studied. We present a hardware-agnostic, real-time P300 acquisition pipeline built on BrainFlow and Lab Streaming Layer (LSL) that runs unchanged across consumer- and research-grade EEG headsets, with permutation tests of signal separability. Using a standard 6 x 6 row/column paradigm, we piloted five configurations: a custom dry system, a custom wet/gel system, Emotiv Flex, Emotiv EPOC X, and Muse 2. The custom systems and EPOC X showed weak or inconsistent signal separability, Muse 2 had the highest acquisition reliability despite limited centro-parietal coverage, and Flex showed the most promising signal. In 20 further Flex sessions varying subject, timing, and phrase length (131 target characters), a peak-amplitude permutation test and a cross-validated xDAWN decoder both detected a significant target response under two channel-exclusion policies, with decoder AUC reaching about 0.72 after 15 repetitions. Character accuracy depended heavily on evaluation methodology: in-sample majority voting reached 94.7%, whereas character-held-out accuracy was 31.3% with evidence accumulated across repetitions, about three times that of held-out majority voting. These analyses indicate that Flex captured a detectable, if still weak, P300 under the studied conditions, while broader participant-level validation and improved decoding remain necessary.2026-09-09T11:22:03ZIsabella GuanRui LiuFusheng Wanghttp://arxiv.org/abs/2609.09960v1Somatosensory Activation and Attentional States in Creative Making2026-09-09T09:48:43ZThe methods for capturing the creative process come with associated tensions around memory recall, articulation, and communication during the act of making, as well as how to record these considerations. This paper has a twofold purpose: first, to offer an example of a mixed methodology, drawn from dance anthropology, sensory ethnography, and design, that applies embodied methods as an alternative for documenting creative making. Specifically, this incorporates the researcher-as-participant and the collation of fieldnotes, embodied knowledge/movement recall, with notation forms, and participant interviews. These are existing methods in dance anthropology; however, using them alongside exploratory prototyping and workshop approaches broadened this work into transdisciplinary practice. Second, it discusses the activation of somatosensory systems through wearable technology and the facilitation of heightened sensory awareness for the practitioner, leading to a subsequent ability to focus on creative decisions linked to reflection and metacognition.2026-09-09T09:48:43ZIn Proceedings of The First Reflection in Creative Experience (RiCE) Workshop (RiCE W1) arXiv:2607.24558Katherine Reeshttp://arxiv.org/abs/2609.04355v2VLA-Precision: Asymmetric Co-Bootstrapping for Efficient Real-World Online RL of Vision-Language-Action Models2026-09-09T09:42:55ZPretrained vision-language-action (VLA) models enable broad manipulation but remain unreliable in tasks demanding precision and repeatability. Applying real-world online reinforcement learning (RL) to VLA post-training enables autonomous trial-and-error improvement beyond demonstrations alone, but exposes two bottlenecks: 1) unreliable value signals can induce policy drift; 2) large-VLA overhead constrains throughput and sample efficiency. To address these challenges, we present VLA-Precision, an efficient real-world online RL framework featuring the Asymmetric Co-Bootstrapping (ACoB) algorithm and the ACoB-Stream architecture. Specifically, ACoB establishes asymmetric co-bootstrapping across timescales: early intervention-guided behavioral learning rapidly improves policy performance while enhancing online experience quality. As autonomous experience accumulates, global return propagation and local preference ranking progressively calibrate value estimates, yielding relative action advantages for reference-regularized policy improvement while suppressing drift. To enable ACoB on large VLAs, we develop ACoB-Stream, a closed-loop experience--policy architecture that establishes invariant-state decoupling and on-demand streaming as design principles, delivering up to 10.9$\times$ improvements in throughput and computational efficiency. Extensive evaluations on nine high-precision chemistry tasks across four categories and four robot embodiments show that VLA-Precision achieves 98.3\% mean success rate in 45.8 min/task, with 27.6 s episodes running at 1.2$\times$ and 1.8$\times$ the speeds of VLA and RL baselines. Resources are available at https://vla-precision.github.io.2026-09-03T18:19:36Z17 pages, 14 figuresChenyu SuZhaolong ShenYuan QianChen QianRui ZhangFeng YanWeixing ChenFei ZhangJiamin WangShuang CongWeiwei Shanghttp://arxiv.org/abs/2602.06759v3"Tab, Tab, Bug": Security Pitfalls of Next Edit Suggestions in AI-Integrated IDEs2026-09-09T07:36:24ZModern AI-integrated IDEs are shifting from passive code completion to proactive Next Edit Suggestions (NES). Unlike traditional autocompletion, NES is designed to construct a richer context from both recent user interactions and the broader codebase to suggest multi-line, cross-line, or even cross-file modifications. This evolution significantly streamlines the programming workflow into a tab-by-tab interaction and enhances developer productivity. Consequently, NES introduces a more complex context retrieval mechanism and sophisticated interaction patterns. However, existing studies focus almost exclusively on the security implications of standalone LLM-based code generation, ignoring the potential attack vectors posed by NES in modern AI-integrated IDEs. The underlying mechanisms of NES remain under-explored, and their security implications are not yet fully understood.
In this paper, we conduct the first systematic security study of NES systems. First, we perform an in-depth dissection of the NES mechanisms to understand the newly introduced threat vectors. It is found that NES retrieves a significantly expanded context, including inputs from imperceptible user actions and global codebase retrieval, which increases the attack surfaces. Second, we conduct a comprehensive in-lab study to evaluate the security implications of NES. The evaluation results reveal that NES is susceptible to context poisoning and is sensitive to transactional edits and human-IDE interactions. Third, we perform a large-scale online survey involving over 200 professional developers to assess the perceptions of NES security risks in real-world development workflows. The survey results indicate a general lack of awareness regarding the potential security pitfalls associated with NES, highlighting the need for increased education and improved security countermeasures in AI-integrated IDEs.2026-02-06T15:06:36ZTo appear in ACM CCS 2026Yunlong LyuYixuan TangPeng ChenTian DongXinyu WangZhiqiang DongHao Chen10.1145/3830454.3846699