https://arxiv.org/api/E2UUPfqNWWmZIUbS67ONHyJywTM 2026-09-11T17:47:47Z 15479 0 15 http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.11923v1 2026-09-10T17:58:14Z

Counterfactual regret minimization (CFR) is one of the few large numerical workloads that still runs faster on CPUs than on GPUs. Each iteration sweeps a game tree with up to billions of states in millions of small, interdependent gather and scatter steps issued through a generic tree interface. On a GPU every kernel finishes in microseconds, so kernel launches and framework dispatch dominate the run time, and prior GPU implementations have lost to optimized CPU code. We observe that for a fixed game, everything about a CFR iteration except the numerical values is known before the first iteration runs. We propose GPU-CFR, a compiler and runtime built on this observation. It compiles any game once into static dataflow: flat edge and information-set arrays, precomputed indices, and depth-level batched passes fix the entire operation sequence, and only solver state changes between iterations. Static chance folding, depth-level execution blocks, and a dual-lane reach buffer cut the number of framework operations by up to 18.1x. Because shapes, indices, and buffer addresses never change, CUDA Graph Replay records the iteration once and replays it with a single graph launch. On one A100, across an eight-game suite that spans card games, dice games, and board games, GPU-CFR runs 29.8--80.4x faster than the fastest prior GPU CFR on the same accelerator, and 14--258x faster than LiteEFG, one of the fastest open-source CPU implementations, on the four largest games. The compiled representation carries most of that margin: on eight CPU threads with no accelerator it is already 2.2--51.1x faster than the GPU baseline. On the CPU the optimized path reproduces the reference iterates bitwise, and tree construction and graph capture pay for themselves within the first solve. GPU-CFR beats every CPU and GPU baseline on the mid-to-large games of the suite without changing the update rule.

2026-09-10T17:58:14Z Boning Li Longbo Huang http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.11912v1 2026-09-10T17:57:06Z

We settle the main open question in the theory of approval-based multi-winner elections: we show that there always exists a committee in the core. The core is a stability and group fairness concept. The proof introduces a new voting rule that optimizes an entropy-like objective function over committees and payment systems. All local optima of this objective function lie in the core, which implies that a core committee can be found in polynomial time.

2026-09-10T17:57:06Z 20 pages. The proof was obtained with GPT-6 Astra Patrick Becker Matthias Greger Dominik Peters http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.11889v1 2026-09-10T17:50:07Z

We consider a game theoretic approach to solve multi-agent coordination problems with submodular objectives. It is known for such problems that the Nash equilibria for the corresponding game are always within 50% of the optimal. A recent work further shows that the equilibria which achieve this worst-case bound are not stable. Leveraging this, we design an Approximate Best Response Algorithm (ABRA) governed by a noise parameter and a rationality parameter. The noise allows ABRA to escape the bad equilibria and the rationality parameter balances any degradation in the objective function caused by the noise. We show for any two-player game that if ABRA converges to a Nash equilibrium, its system objective value is strictly more than 50% of optimal plus a term controlled by the noise parameter. Otherwise, ABRA converges to some recurrent class: if a recurrent class contains any action profile yielding system objective less than 50% of the optimal, the class must also contain either the optimal action profile or an action profile yielding system objective strictly more than 50\% of the optimal by the same amount in addition to a factor controlled by noise parameter. The time that ABRA spends in such action profiles can be controlled using the rationality parameter. Using numerical simulations, we show that the minimum expected objective function is typically well above half of the optimal.

2026-09-10T17:50:07Z 2024 IEEE 63rd Conference on Decision and Control (CDC), Milan, Italy, 2024, pp. 1745-1750 Vartika Singh Philip N. Brown 10.1109/CDC56724.2024.10886194 http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.11863v1 2026-09-10T17:41:49Z

We consider a game theoretic approach to solve multi-agent coordination problems with submodular maximization objectives. It is known for such problems that the Nash equilibria for the corresponding game are always within 50% of the optimal, but that the equilibria which achieve this worst-case bound are not stable. To exploit this instability, we propose a family of algorithms which we call Truncated Noisy Best-Response (TNBR) Algorithms. These algorithms are flexibly characterized by agents asynchronously and stochastically selecting actions from a neighbourhood of their best response payoffs. We compute bounds on the recurrent classes of TNBR algorithms' associated Markov chains. Our bounds fall into two categories: first, "Performance" bounds ensure that TNBR algorithms always have a high-value recurrent state; second, "Safety" bounds ensure that TNBR algorithms never have arbitrarily-bad recurrent states. Furthermore, these two types of bounds are linked by a waterbed-like effect: every game with a poor Safety guarantee necessarily has a favorable Performance guarantee.

2026-09-10T17:41:49Z Vartika Singh Philip N. Brown http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.23288v3 2026-09-10T13:47:33Z

We study flow games with public arcs, an extension of classical cooperative flow games that allows players to use public resources. In these games, a coalition corresponds to a set of arcs, while certain arcs, called public arcs, can be used freely by any coalition. The value of a coalition is the maximum flow value achievable using the arcs controlled by the coalition along with the public arcs. We investigate two solution concepts, the least core and the nucleolus. Both solution concepts provide fair ways to allocate the value of the grand coalition among individual players. We provide polynomial-size formulations of the least core of these games. We also give a deterministic polynomial-time algorithm for computing the nucleolus, whether or not the core is empty.

2026-06-22T13:02:50Z Tianhang Lu Han Xiao Qizhi Fang http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.21001v3 2026-09-10T12:31:13Z

Strategic voting is a canonical failure mode for collective choice: a voter may obtain a more preferred outcome by reporting a ballot that differs from its true preferences. This paper introduces an oracle-based benchmark for testing whether large language model (LLM) voters can discover and execute such manipulations. Each instance gives an LLM voter a true preference ranking, the other voters' ballots, a deterministic voting rule, and a prompt condition. An exact oracle enumerates every feasible report by the LLM voter, computes the sincere outcome, identifies all profitable reports, and records the best achievable outcome. The benchmark therefore supplies ground truth for strategic success without human labels or subjective grading of explanations. The benchmark covers plurality, Borda, approval, instant-runoff voting, and Copeland-style pairwise majority voting; prompt conditions separate sincere, strategic, civic, and expert framings. To keep the primary study defensible while preserving the main comparisons, the registered core design fixes a single electorate size, uses 600 balanced election instances, and produces 9,600 model--prompt responses when run with four model configurations and four prompt conditions. Because existing peer-reviewed work does not report manipulation discovery, optimal manipulation, false manipulation, near-miss, or invalid-ballot rates for this exact task, we do not impute LLM performance from unrelated studies. Instead, we report exact oracle-calibration baselines that bound and contextualize subsequent model results. By reducing strategic-voting behavior to exact counterfactual evaluation, the benchmark turns the question ``Do LLM voters vote sincerely or strategically?'' into a reproducible social-choice experiment.

2026-06-19T00:28:43Z 23 pages Seyed Pouyan Mousavi Davoudi Arshia Gharagozlou Alireza Amiri-Margavi Amin Gholami Davodi Hamidreza Hasani Balyani http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.03846v2 2026-09-10T06:41:51Z

We study the allocation of indivisible goods among agents with identical additive valuations, focusing on envy-freeness up to one good (EF1) and Nash social welfare (NSW). Since every maximum-NSW allocation is EF1 under additive valuations, the associated threshold problem inherits the known strong NP-hardness of NSW maximization under identical additive valuations and is strongly NP-complete. We therefore focus on welfare guarantees satisfied by arbitrary EF1 allocations. Although every such allocation is known to achieve an $e^{-1/e}$-approximation to the unrestricted optimal NSW, we identify conditions yielding stronger guarantees. Under uniform valuations, every EF1 allocation is NSW-optimal. Under an $\varepsilon$-small-item condition, every EF1 allocation achieves an explicit approximation ratio $ρ_n(\varepsilon)$ satisfying $ρ_n(\varepsilon) = 1-O(\varepsilon^2)$ as $\varepsilon\to 0$ for fixed $n$. We further consider the stronger sequential requirement that EF1 be maintained after every item assignment. For this setting, we propose \emph{PriorityNet}, a deep reinforcement learning framework trained using Proximal Policy Optimization and equipped with prospective EF1 action masking. The mask restricts every decision to assignments that preserve EF1, thereby guaranteeing prefix-wise EF1 by construction without post-processing repair. Across 3,000 test instances in each of the offline and random-order online regimes ($n\in[2,20]$ and $m\in[5,100]$), PriorityNet attains mean normalized $\operatorname{NSW}$ values of $0.9911$ and $0.9701$, respectively. Relative to offline Longest Processing Time (LPT) and online least-valued-bundle baselines, it achieves instance-wise win-minus-loss rates of $+27.10\%$ and $+17.87\%$, while matching the offline baseline's mean normalized welfare to four decimal places and modestly improving the online mean from $0.9694$ to $0.9701$.

2026-09-03T13:40:07Z Zih-Sian Yang Yi-Hao Chen Yu-Te Kuan Cheng-Jui Wu Chuang-Chieh Lin Po-An Chen http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.11116v1 2026-09-10T05:48:57Z

We introduce cooperative integer programming games (CIPGs), in which agents pool budget constraints to accomplish indivisible tasks jointly and the characteristic function maps every coalition to the optimal value of a pooled integer program. Our goal is to identify an optimal coalition structure (OCS) and a stable one (OSCS). We derive a stability inequality that keeps each formed coalition in the Core with respect to itself, and present two mixed-integer OCS formulations, aggregated and disaggregated, proving that the disaggregated formulation is integer-equivalent yet yields a tighter LP relaxation. Building on the stability inequality we develop lifted stability cuts, several separation strategies inside a cutting-plane algorithm, an SCS-feasible primal heuristic that constructs warm starts with guaranteed stability, and a payoff-refinement step computing the Shapley value and the nucleolus of every formed coalition. On benchmark cooperative knapsack games, the method certifies optimality with up to 16 players and reaches MIP gaps below 1% at 30 players while evaluating 766 of the roughly $10^9$ coalition values.

2026-09-10T05:48:57Z Hyunwoo Lee Robert Hildebrand I. Esra Buyuktahtakin http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.01048v2 2026-09-10T02:23:59Z

This paper studies the problem of minimizing group-level inequity in facility location games on the real line, where agents belong to different groups and may act strategically. We explore a fairness-oriented objective that minimizes the maximum group effect introduced by Marsh and Schilling (1994). Each group's effect is defined as its total or maximum distance to the nearest facility, weighted by group-specific factors. We show that this formulation generalizes several prominent optimization objectives, including the classical utilitarian (social cost) and egalitarian (maximum cost) objectives, as well as two group-fair objectives, maximum total and average group cost. In order to minimize the maximum group effect, we first propose two novel mechanisms for the single-facility case, the BALANCED mechanism and the MajorPhantom mechanism. Both are strategyproof and achieve tight approximation guarantees under distinct formulations of the maximum group effect objective. Our mechanisms recover the known tight approximation guarantees for classical group-fair objectives as special cases, while extending them to a broader weighted framework and unifying several classical truthful mechanisms.

2026-02-01T06:21:59Z Accepted in AAAI 2026 Yuhang Guo Houyu Zhou http://arxiv.org/abs/2408.10077v4 2026-09-10T02:23:35Z

We study the welfare-maximizing allocation of heterogeneous objects when screening uses costly effort rather than monetary transfers. No-screening mechanisms perform well as object variety increases. In a symmetric continuous market with i.i.d. values whose CDF is log-concave, the multidimensional problem reduces exactly to a single-dimensional problem in agents' best-option values. More options make low best-option values rarer, weakening the case for screening. We characterize when no screening is optimal and show it remains optimal as variety expands. Large-variety limits and numerical results for finite, correlated markets support this pattern. We apply these results to propose an invitation-based vaccine appointment system.

2024-08-19T15:20:42Z Shunya Noda Genta Okada http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.10960v1 2026-09-10T01:29:37Z

We study the fair allocation of $m$ indivisible chores to $n$ agents with subadditive cost functions arriving online in an arbitrary order. Upon an agent's arrival, we are informed of her cost function and must irrevocably assign her a set of chores. We focus on the Maximin Share (MMS) fairness notion and aim to compute an allocation in which all items are assigned, and no agent incurs a cost more than $α$ times her MMS. Without any prior information about the instance (other than $n$ and $m$), we design an algorithm with a competitive ratio of $O(\min\{n, k\log^{1+ε}k, \log m\})$ for any constant $ε> 0$, where $k$ denotes the number of cost function types. Our bound matches the best known offline approximation guarantees for MMS under subadditive costs and is nearly optimal with respect to all three parameters: we show that even for binary additive cost functions, no online algorithm can achieve a competitive ratio of $o(\min\{n, k\log k, \log m\})$. We then consider the setting in which the $k$ cost function types are known in advance (though the realized types of arriving agents are not). For additive cost functions, we provide an algorithm with a competitive ratio of $O(\min\{\log k, \log(kn)/\log\log(kn)\})$, and show that constant-competitive algorithms do not exist for general $k$, even for the binary additive setting. For binary additive functions when $k \le n$, we propose a $3$-competitive algorithm and establish a lower bound of $2$.

2026-09-10T01:29:37Z Haolong Li Zehan Lin Huahua Miao Xiaowei Wu http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.10887v1 2026-09-09T22:45:58Z

The Single Transferable Vote (STV) is an algorithmic election rule. Round by round, a profile of ranked-choice ballots is reinterpreted to determine which decision to make next, and candidates are seated or eliminated until a full winner set emerges. This algorithmic nature makes STV theoretically more brittle than other election rules: uncertainty about an early round of the election might percolate irreversibly into the rest. For this reason, a generalized non-trivial Risk-Limiting Audit (RLA) framework has remained elusive for STV. Such a framework must concoct a set of null hypotheses, or assertions, whose rejection would bound the probability that the outcome of the election was incorrectly reported. We present audit graphs as a solution to design the assertions needed for RLAs of arbitrary STV elections, as well as quantitatively describe the uncertainty (or lack thereof) of their outcomes. These audit graphs explore election paths that are ``close'' to the recorded one by considering the alternative decisions the STV algorithm might have made if a small number of ballots were perturbed.

2026-09-09T22:45:58Z Edouard Heitzmann http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.06851v4 2026-09-09T22:08:04Z

In contextual bilateral trade under full feedback, the posted price does not affect which valuations are observed. We show that in this model such action-independent feedback removes the polynomial adaptation penalty familiar from heavy-tailed bandits: fully parameter-free algorithms attain the oracle minimax $T$-exponents up to logarithmic factors, with no knowledge of the moment order $p \in (1,2)$ or its scale $σ_p$, and -- in the nonparametric case -- none of the effective Hölder smoothness $β\in (0,1]$. The statistic that makes model selection possible is a paired squared-loss difference, whose noise-square term cancels exactly, leaving noise damped by the candidate gap. The resulting bilateral-trade regret rates are new. Trader valuations have bounded conditional densities and heavy tails -- finite $p$-th moments for some $p \in (1,2)$, with possibly infinite variance. An epoch-based algorithm with truncated means achieves regret $\widetilde{O}(T^{(2-p)/p})$ in the parametric model and $\widetilde{O}(T^{1-2β(p-1)/(βp + d(p-1))})$ when the market value function is $β$-Hölder, with matching $Ω(\cdot)$ lower bounds -- under a mild nondegeneracy condition -- via Assouad's method and a fixed-support mixture construction -- characterizing the minimax rate in $T$ up to logarithmic factors over the effective smoothness range $β\in (0,1]$, interpolating between the classical nonparametric rate at $p{=}2$ and the trivial linear rate as $p \to 1^+$. The enabling structural step extends the self-bounding property of Bachoc et al. (ICML 2025) from bounded to real-valued valuations: within our conditionally independent, conditionally centered noise model, bounded conditional densities and finite first moments suffice for the expected regret of any price $π$ to satisfy $\mathbb{E}[g(m,V,W) - g(π,V,W)] \le L|m-π|^2$ -- no second moment is needed.

2026-03-06T20:15:58Z 29 pages. v4: title changed (v3: Minimax Regret with Infinite Variance); abstract and introduction reframed around the feedback-interface message; adds a formal parametric two-point lower bound and corollaries on the price of adaptivity; corrections to the lower-bound construction and epoch assembly; related work expanded Hangyi Zhao http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.10759v1 2026-09-09T19:00:14Z

Society constantly has to determine the boundaries of what it deems acceptable, from legislative decisions to the guardrails governing autonomous systems. We initiate the axiomatic study of collective consent: given individuals' attitudes toward options, which options should receive societal consent? We organize our analysis around three principles: sufficient support, minority protection, and dominance by decisively better options. Each captures a distinct reason for withholding societal consent from an option. For each principle, we develop a corresponding solution concept that transparently implements the principle and is canonical in a mathematically precise sense. For example, for minority protection, the resulting concept is a consent-adapted version of Moulin's Proportional Veto Core. Balancing multiple principles simultaneously is more challenging. To address this, we develop a game-theoretic characterization of our veto core that naturally gives rise to a family of related concepts. From this family, we identify the Approval-Weighted Veto Core as particularly desirable. By making minorities' blocking power depend on the approval support of the options being challenged, it smoothly interpolates between proportional minority protection and majority support. Experiments on five datasets spanning high-stakes decision-making (such as political elections, ethical AI evaluations, and moral decision-making) show that solution concepts violating a principle in theory also violate it empirically.

2026-09-09T19:00:14Z 41 pages, 4 tables, 19 figures Chris Dong Sonja Kraiczy Rohit Vasishta Markus Brill Wesley H. Holliday Niclas Boehmer http://arxiv.org/abs/2209.13148v4 2026-09-09T17:44:44Z

A menu description exposes strategyproofness by presenting a mechanism to player $i$ in two steps. Step (1) uses others' reports to describe $i$'s menu of potential outcomes. Step (2) uses $i$'s report to select $i$'s favorite outcome from her menu. We provide novel menu descriptions of the Deferred Acceptance (DA) and Top Trading Cycles (TTC) matching mechanisms. For TTC, our description additionally yields a proof of the strategyproofness of TTC's traditional description, in a way that we prove is impossible for DA.

2022-09-27T04:31:42Z Yannai A. Gonczarowski Ori Heffetz Clayton Thomas