https://arxiv.org/api/Zdb1/mZpOhxnNzpdV7d6Tr+VRfc2026-09-11T18:48:54Z62091515http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.04122v2Synchronization Strings over the Optimal Alphabet2026-09-07T15:16:19ZSynchronization strings provide deterministic position labels for recovering coordinates after insertions and deletions. Haeupler and Shahrasbi introduced these objects, and subsequent work proved that four symbols suffice for some fixed parameter epsilon < 1, whereas two symbols cannot support arbitrarily long synchronization strings. We resolve the remaining ternary case: every length admits a ternary 2001/2002-synchronization string. Thus three is the exact minimum constant alphabet size. A computer-assisted refinement based on a larger 54-uniform family yields ternary epsilon-synchronization strings for every epsilon > 215/216.
The previous four-symbol construction uses a ternary square-free backbone to exclude short repetitions and a fourth symbol to carry long-range synchronization marks. Our main technical contribution is a local-entropy transfer theorem: every square-free block-local source with a positive interval conditional min-entropy rate supports synchronization strings with a fixed gap. We instantiate this theorem using occurrence-wise branching in a Brinkhuis family. Every outcome remains ternary and square-free, while every long interval retains linear conditional min-entropy after all choices outside it are exposed. A deletion-ball estimate converts this entropy into an exponentially small probability of a near-complete common subsequence between adjacent intervals, and an asymmetric Lovasz Local Lemma enforces all interval constraints simultaneously. The same framework also yields exponentially many valid words, synchronization circles, and synchronization within a class of extremal square-free words. Adding constraints on distant intervals gives a Las Vegas construction in expected O(n^2 log^3(n+2)) time.2026-09-03T17:24:07Z46 pagesHuibo XuShi FuYouming QiaoDacheng Taohttp://arxiv.org/abs/2602.09360v4The Similarity Control Problem with Required Events2026-09-07T09:55:04ZIn order to guarantee that a supervised system satisfies safety requirements of the specification, as well as requirements saying that in certain states certain events must be enabled, this paper introduces required events for discrete event systems and reconsiders the similarity control problem while taking all requirements from the specification into account. The notion of a covariant-contravariant simulation, which is finer than the conventional notion of simulation, is adopted to act as the behavioral relation of supervisory control theory. A necessary and sufficient condition for the solvability of this problem is established and a method for synthesizing a maximally permissive supervisor is provided.2026-02-10T03:09:47ZYu WangZhaohui ZhuRob van GlabbeekJinjin ZhangYixuan Lihttp://arxiv.org/abs/2601.03020v4Hardness of Regular Expression Matching with Extensions2026-09-06T02:46:05ZRegular expression matching asks whether a given regular expression of length $m$ matches a given string of length $n$, and its time complexity is fairly well understood. Meanwhile, regular expressions have been extended to support various extensions for both theoretical and practical reasons, which can substantially change the time complexity of the matching problem. In this work, we consider four well-known extensions to regular expressions called intersection, squaring, complement and backreference, and we prove a number of novel conditional time complexity lower bounds for the regular expression matching problems with these extensions under the Orthogonal Vectors Conjecture, the $k$-Orthogonal Vectors Conjecture or the $k$-Clique hypotheses. Our lower bounds significantly narrow the gaps to the known upper bounds, with some even being (conditionally) optimal in that the dependence on $n$ cannot be polynomially reduced while keeping the dependence on $m$ polynomial (or even elementary, for complement). Additionally, to obtain our results for intersection, squaring and complement in a unified manner, we introduce novel problems called Dyck Selection, Orthogonal Dyck Selection and Generalized Dyck Selection. They are arguably natural formal language and stringology problems that are based on Greibach's hardest context-free language and capture the essence of why the regular expression matching problems with these extensions are hard.2026-01-06T13:47:13ZAbstract shortenedTaisei NogamiYoshiki NakamuraTachio Terauchihttp://arxiv.org/abs/2609.06210v1From Ramsey-Based to Congruence-Based Constructions for Büchi Complementation2026-09-05T18:13:54ZThe very first construction by J. Richard Büchi himself for complementing a Büchi automaton relies on a fundamental lemma about the division of an arbitrary infinite word into consecutive finite words, which was cleanly proven by invoking a specialized theorem of Ramsey. For that reason, constructions of similar nature have subsequently been labeled as Ramsey-based. Nevertheless, it suffices to have a weaker form of the lemma where the finite words come from a finite number of congruence classes, rather than arbitrary classes, that form a partition of the set of all finite words. The weaker lemma, with support of nicer properties from a congruence, can be proven without Ramsey's theorem. A commonly adopted improvement on such complementation constructions also requires the working of a congruence. This paper recounts the history and reviews using more contemporary terminology wherever possible the relevant concepts and results, to advocate renaming of Ramsey-based constructions as congruence-based constructions.2026-09-05T18:13:54ZYih-Kuen TsayMoshe Y. Vardihttp://arxiv.org/abs/2609.05005v1A Computational Obstruction to Swapping Area and Dinv: An Automata-Theoretic View of the $q,t$-Catalan Symmetry2026-09-04T11:16:34ZAlgebraic combinatorics often seeks bijections that explain identities between distributions object by object. Encoding combinatorial objects as words lets automata theory study such a bijection as a word-to-word computation and measure its memory, input access, and control of output order. This refines existence questions by asking which computational mechanisms a bijection requires. We develop this viewpoint for Dyck paths.
Our motivating example is the $q,t$-Catalan polynomial. Let $D_n$ be the set of Dyck paths of semilength $n$, let $D=\bigcup_{n\ge 0}D_n$, and let $area, dinv, bounce \colon D\to\mathbb{N}$ be the standard statistics. Then, \[
C_n(q,t)=\sum_{P\in D_n}q^{area(P)}t^{bounce(P)}
=\sum_{P\in D_n}q^{dinv(P)}t^{area(P)}. \] Haglund's zeta map $ζ\colon D\to D$ gives a bijective proof: it preserves semilength and sends $(dinv,area)$ to $(area,bounce)$. By contrast, the full symmetry $C_n(q,t)=C_n(t,q)$ still lacks a direct explanation: no explicit, uniform, semilength-preserving bijection is known that swaps area and dinv on every Dyck path.
Polyregular maps from automata theory provide a natural computational starting point, but we prove that neither $ζ$ nor the classical height-sweep bijection witnessing Narayana symmetry is polyregular. The missing mechanism is global ordering by numerical levels whose range grows with the input. We call this a \emph{rank sort} and introduce \emph{weighted-rank polyregular maps} (WRP), extending polyregular maps by one such sort and containing both bijections. Nevertheless, WRP is a proper subclass of deterministic logspace. We prove that $ζ^{-1}$ lies outside WRP and that no WRP map can realise a semilength-preserving area-dinv swap. Thus the rank-sorting strategy behind $ζ$ cannot be extended within WRP to exchange the two statistics.2026-09-04T11:16:34Z76 pages, Lean formalisation available at https://github.com/hongseok-yang/automata-catalan-symmetry-releaseJineon BaekByung-Hak HwangJoonhyun LaHongseok Yanghttp://arxiv.org/abs/2609.05002v1On the equivalence between generating functions computed by memory transducers and enumerating functions produced by indexed grammars2026-09-04T11:11:58ZWe consider the sequences of natural integers that can be computed by a deterministic transducer, with input in a structure A, output in N. and with memory the set of stacks of stacks of A. We show that these sequences are, exactly, the counting sequences of formal languages generated by unambiguous context-free indexed grammars (equivalently, the counting sequences of derivation trees of arbitrary context-free indexed grammars), with indexes in A. This general theorem applies, notably, to the set of natural integers endowed with the operation -1 and the non-zero predicate, showing that the polynomial recurrences count exactly the index-languages (where the parameter used for counting is the index itself).2026-09-04T11:11:58ZVincent Ghigohttp://arxiv.org/abs/2609.04661v1Interpretability for Turing Machines2026-09-04T02:47:42ZWe show that susceptibilities, an interpretability technique developed for neural networks, can identify the presence of algorithmic structure in Turing machines by probing the local loss landscape of a learning problem for noisy Turing machines introduced by Murfet and Troiani (arXiv:2504.08075). We prove that symmetries and path separation in the algorithm implemented by a Turing machine induce permutation symmetries and low-rank blocks in its susceptibility matrix. We study this empirically on a set of deterministic finite automata (DFAs) and demonstrate that algorithmic features can be recovered by principal component analysis and clustering methods in susceptibility space.2026-09-04T02:47:42Z75 pages, 31 figures, 3 tables. Interactive companion: https://tminterp.timaeus.co. Code and data: doi:10.5281/zenodo.22205895Billy SnikkersRumi SalazarDaniel MurfetWill Troianihttp://arxiv.org/abs/2609.04346v1Languages and Recognition in a Category with Factorisation2026-09-03T18:10:30ZLanguage recognition by homomorphisms is a central construction of algebraic language theory. Initially studied for monoids and semigroups, it has subsequently been expanded to other algebraic structures. Our new categorical account is based on fibrations, which have already seen other applications in automata theory. Languages and surjective homomorphisms give indeed rise to two fibrations, and the notion of language recognition is stable under reindexing. We develop this framework in a category with a factorisation system and address two main technical questions in the fibrational setting. First, we provide sufficient conditions under which languages have syntactic quotients (which is a generalisation of syntactic congruences) and we show how such quotients can be described in some concrete cases using a result by Slomiński. Second, we introduce sufficient conditions under which (regular) languages are closed under certain J-limits and J-colimits.2026-09-03T18:10:30Z23 pages, 3 figuresHarsh BeoharMike CruchtenGeorg Struthhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2609.03670v1Target Discounted Sum Problem on Markov Chains with Applications to Markov Decision Processes2026-09-03T11:05:43ZThe discounted sum is a way to aggregate a sequence of weights from a finite alphabet $Σ$, i.e., for a discount factor $λ$, the discounted sum of a sequence $w_0 w_1 w_2 \cdots$ over $Σ$ is $\sum_{i \in \mathbb{N}} w_i λ^i$. The target discounted-sum problem, which is currently open, asks, given $λ,Σ$ and a target $t$, whether there exists an infinite sequence over $Σ$ whose discounted sum is equal to $t$. We study and solve a probabilistic variant of this problem, i.e., the target discounted-sum problem on Markov chains. To do this, we prove that the event consisting of paths whose discounted sum is equal to the target and has infinitely many distinct suffix sums has probability zero. This structural property allows us to solve the target discounted-sum problem on Markov chains using an automata-theoretic technique. We apply our technical results to Markov decision processes with target discounted-sum objectives: we show that the infimum value and the finite-memory supremum value are computable in pseudo-polynomial time and are attained by deterministic finite-memory strategies.2026-09-03T11:05:43ZNathalie BertrandPranav GhorpadeSenthil RajasekaranSasha RubinMoshe Y. Vardihttp://arxiv.org/abs/2609.03643v1Relative Prime Factorization and Finite-State Presentations under Fixed Finite-Monoid Observation2026-09-03T10:44:26ZLet $L\subseteqΣ^*$ and fix a morphism $h:Σ^*\to M$ into a finite monoid. We study exact factorization and canonical presentation in the relative syntactic congruence $θ_{L,h}:=\equiv_L\cap\ker h$.
We separate unique factorization from finite direct presentation. An exhaustively computer-checked $36$-element quotient has a unique exact prime factorization for every live non-unit class, yet its valid prime-return rules contain an infinite family, so unique factorization does not imply the finite relative presentation property (FRP), even for a finite quotient. We lift the same defect to a nonregular context-free language with an infinite relative quotient and finite prime spectrum.
To isolate the obstruction, we introduce the finite-state relative presentation property (FSRP), in which canonical valid right-hand-side languages are represented by finite residual controllers, and prove $\mathrm{FRP}\subsetneq\mathrm{FSRP}$. We then introduce prime-target left-division determinism (PTLD), which implies unique exact factorization, tail exactness, tail determinism, and a quadratic bound on valid rules. A nonregular deterministic context-free example with a finite group observer satisfies PTLD while lying outside every fixed $(k,\ell)$-substitutable class. Finally, for fixed $h$ we give a strong positive-data learner for the canonical PTLD presentation with polynomial-time hypothesis updates and a finite characteristic sample, together with a limit reconstruction of the canonical FSRP controller from weakly behaviorally correct CFG-valued learners.2026-09-03T10:44:26Z47 pages; reproducible verification code and a machine-readable certificate for the 36-element witness are available via the fixed GitHub snapshot cited in the paperTakayuki Kuriyamahttp://arxiv.org/abs/2609.00678v2Two-State Max-Plus Comparison Is Decidable2026-09-02T21:58:09ZDaviaud, Guillon, and Merlet proved that comparison of max-plus automata is undecidable under a fixed state bound of 553 and explicitly left the range from 2 to 552 states open. We resolve the two-state endpoint. More strongly, given an arbitrary finite max-plus automaton $A$ and a max-plus automaton $B$ with at most two states, it is decidable whether $[\![A]\!](w)\leq [\![B]\!](w)$ for every word $w$. The structural reason is a one-dimensional projective normal form for two-state dynamics. Outside an effective bounded region, a transition has one of three tail behaviors: it propagates the unbounded projective gap with gap-independent height increment, forgets the gap with gap-independent height increment, or reads the gap magnitude into the height increment and then forgets it. In particular, any transition whose output depends on the unbounded gap necessarily destroys that gap. This yields an exact one-counter realization of $B$. Effective semilinearity of context-free Parikh images then reduces comparison to Presburger arithmetic. As a consequence, two-state max-plus comparison, equivalence, and positivity are decidable.2026-09-01T03:56:09Z8 pages. Revised presentation and clarified the proof; main result unchangedKeigo Okahttp://arxiv.org/abs/2609.03161v1NeuroSTAR: Automata-guided Neuro-symbolic Specification Formalization2026-09-02T20:53:48ZAutomated translation of natural language (NL) descriptions into Linear Temporal Logic over finite traces (LTLf) is a prerequisite for automated formal verification of a system's dynamic behavior. Several LLM-based methods have recently shown potential for this task. However, they struggle with the nuance of natural language descriptions, which can lead LLMs to only partially capture the intended meaning. To address this limitation, we propose NeuroSTAR (Automata-guided Neuro-symbolic Specification Formalization), an NL-to-LTLf framework that builds on two insights. First, it leverages multiple generators to obtain diverse LTLf candidates. Second, it uses an automata-theoretic semantic comparison based on DFA traces to identify behavioral disagreements that guide formula refinement. We evaluate NeuroSTAR and show that it improves NL-to-LTLf translation performance by 8-18 percentage points relative to the prior state-of-the-art (SoTA) on unambiguous benchmarks. We further study its applicability to a body of driving law text, a complex, realistic, and reference-free domain critical for autonomous-vehicle specification. This study shows that NeuroSTAR can capture the necessary temporal semantics in 83.9% of the driving law sections, which demonstrates the effectiveness of automata-guided reference-free refinement in formalization.2026-09-02T20:53:48ZJoy SahaTrey WoodliefSebastian ElbaumMatthew B. Dwyerhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2609.02183v1Neural Logic, Invariance, and the Retina---McCulloch and Pitts2026-09-02T06:47:06ZThis chapter reconstructs the McCulloch-Pitts program as a physics of neural computation rather than the familiar cartoon of a binary neuron. The 1943 logical calculus is developed in both directions: given a net, characterize the propositions realized by its activity; given an admissible logical expression, construct a net that realizes it. We recover the original distinction between thresholded excitatory summation and absolute inhibitory veto-one the weighted-threshold form cannot preserve for arbitrarily large excitatory inputs-and read unit-time delay as the physical realization of logical depth. Recurrence is treated exactly: an autonomous, deterministic network of finitely many binary units has a finite state space, so every trajectory eventually enters a periodic orbit-a fact about finite-state dynamics, not unbounded Turing computation. A single threshold element realizes only linearly separable Boolean functions, whereas finite feedforward networks of them synthesize any Boolean function on a finite domain. We then follows McCulloch and Pitts beyond threshold logic. The 1945 heterarchy paper turns cyclic preference into an obstruction to representation by a scalar utility. The 1947 work on universals asks how a physical network can identify inputs related by nuisance transformations, developed here via group averaging and feedback canonicalization. The 1959 frog-retina study makes the adequate-stimulus question experimental, revealing parallel invariant operations before the brain proper. Spike-triggered analysis shows how a nonlinearly driven neuron can have a vanishing first-order average while second-order statistics recover its hidden selectivity: methodological failure can masquerade as physiological absence. Modern mathematical tools are used without projecting their notation onto the historical papers, and limitations of the idealization are stated explicitly.2026-09-02T06:47:06ZBook chapter from NeuroAI: Theoretical Foundations of Dynamics, Learning and Computation in Brains, Minds, and Machines. Includes reproducible figures and accompanying codeNima Dehghanihttp://arxiv.org/abs/2609.01451v1Behavioral Memory under Symmetry in One-Way Quantum Automata2026-09-01T15:56:26ZUnder compact symmetry, observable behavior reduces to an invariant operator algebra, but its dimension is not yet classical memory: some coordinates are dynamically frozen, some invisible to threshold tests, and some already classical. We develop an operator-algebraic theory that separates these effects through three filters. For one automaton, behavior is the Hilbert--Schmidt pairing between prefix-reachable states and suffix-observable effects, whose rank equals the real Hankel rank without controllability or observability assumptions. Maximizing this invariant over a symmetry-constrained dynamical class gives a structural capacity controlled by the symmetry commutant: its center stores isotypic populations frozen by reversible dynamics, its traceless multiplicity blocks carry movable noncommutative coordinates, dissipation removes the unary spectral loss inside those blocks, and covariant mobility releases relative populations subject to component conservation. Operational realization then determines which surviving coordinates force probabilistic states. For a fixed nontrivial invariant readout, full mobility gives an exact dichotomy in worst-case state cost: a commutative invariant algebra costs exactly its dimension, whereas a noncommutative multiplicity block raises the unrestricted cost by exactly one state. Thus noncommutativity has a one-state worst-case classical price. The known four-letter quadratic-plus-one law at trivial symmetry is the fully mobile endpoint of this principle. Schur--Weyl duality further shows that different preserved symmetries on the same tensor-power Hilbert space can change the worst memory scale from polynomial to exponential, while fixed-weight modules give an exact Catalan law at half filling, with structural capacity equal to the Catalan count minus its central-sector correction.2026-09-01T15:56:26ZZeyu Chenhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2609.01192v1Verification of $K$- and Infinite-Step Strong/Weak Anonymity Using Concurrent Compositions2026-09-01T13:03:52ZAnonymity is an information flow property that provides privacy protection in the sense of non-uniqueness of system information at certain moments with respect to observations. The notion of $K$-step anonymity in the context of discrete-event systems characterizes the scenario that the state estimates cannot be a singleton within at most $K$ observational steps prior to the current instant, while infinite-step anonymity is the same as $K$-step anonymity without considering the limit on $K$. In this paper, we lucubrate $K$- and infinite-step anonymity for partially-observed discrete-event systems modeled by non-deterministic finite-state automata. First, we define two strong types and two weak types of $K$- and infinite-step anonymity that are fundamentally different from the existing notions of $K$- and infinite-step anonymity due to the consideration of strong and weak anonymous projections. Then, we develop a new methodology by exploiting the concurrent-composition technique to verify these four types of anonymity. Based on the constructed concurrent compositions, verifiable necessary and sufficient conditions for the four types of anonymity are provided, along with their complexity analysis. Finally, the upper bounds on $K$ for $K$-step strong anonymity and weak anonymity are computed.2026-09-01T13:03:52ZJiahui ZhangKuize ZhangXiaoguang HanZhiwu Li