https://arxiv.org/api/X7dSQ4zZHHPUPwrs8DSnjpfDK8o 2026-06-22T05:26:30Z 15689 840 15 http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.05885v1 On Edge-Disjoint Maximal Outerplanar Graphs 2026-01-09T16:05:19Z We provide two constructions for $t$ edge-disjoint maximal outerplanar graphs on every number of $n \geq 4t$ vertices. The bound on the minimum number of vertices is tight. These constructions yield the existence of optimal outerthickness-$t$ graphs for every $t \in \mathbb{N}$. While one of the constructions works for all values of $t$ and extends graphs from Guy and Nowakowski (1990), the other one holds only for powers of $2$, but yields graphs with maximum degree logarithmic in the number of vertices. Thus, the latter may be helpful in tackling the open question of determining the outerthickness of all complete graphs. 2026-01-09T16:05:19Z Yuto Okada Yota Otachi Lena Volk http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.16716v3 The Computational Complexity of Counting Linear Regions in ReLU Neural Networks 2026-01-09T12:43:58Z An established measure of the expressive power of a given ReLU neural network is the number of linear regions into which it partitions the input space. There exist many different, non-equivalent definitions of what a linear region actually is. We systematically assess which papers use which definitions and discuss how they relate to each other. We then analyze the computational complexity of counting the number of such regions for the various definitions. Generally, this turns out to be an intractable problem. We prove NP- and #P-hardness results already for networks with one hidden layer and strong hardness of approximation results for two or more hidden layers. Finally, on the algorithmic side, we demonstrate that counting linear regions can at least be achieved in polynomial space for some common definitions. 2025-05-22T14:25:12Z 26 pages, 6 figures, paper accepted at NeurIPS 2025. v3: Update to Fig. 1 Moritz Stargalla Christoph Hertrich Daniel Reichman http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.18845v2 A Truly Subcubic Combinatorial Algorithm for Induced 4-Cycle Detection 2026-01-09T10:02:59Z We present the first truly subcubic, combinatorial algorithm for detecting an induced $4$-cycle in a graph. The running time is $O(n^{2.84})$ on $n$-node graphs, thus separating the task of detecting induced $4$-cycles from detecting triangles, which requires $n^{3-o(1)}$ time combinatorially under the popular BMM hypothesis. Significant work has gone into characterizing the exact time complexity of induced $H$-detection, relative to the complexity of detecting cliques of various sizes. Prior work identified the question of whether induced $4$-cycle detection is triangle-hard as the only remaining case towards completing the lowest level of the classification, dubbing it a "curious" case [Dalirrooyfard, Vassilevska W., FOCS 2022]. Our result can be seen as a negative resolution of this question. Our algorithm deviates from previous techniques in the large body of subgraph detection algorithms and employs the trendy topic of graph decomposition that has hitherto been restricted to more global problems (as in the use of expander decompositions for flow problems) or to shaving subpolynomial factors (as in the application of graph regularity lemmas). While our algorithm is slower than the (non-combinatorial) state-of-the-art $\tilde{O}(n^ω)$-time algorithm based on polynomial identity testing [Vassilevska W., Wang, Williams, Yu, SODA 2014], combinatorial advancements often come with other benefits. In particular, we give the first nontrivial deterministic algorithm for detecting induced $4$-cycles. 2025-07-24T23:02:54Z Amir Abboud Shyan Akmal Nick Fischer http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.05673v1 Local generation of languages: the monotonic binary sequences 2026-01-09T09:42:17Z In a previous article, we have introduced the problem of local generation of languages, where the communication underlying the generation procedure is captured by a simplicial complex. We study in details this problem for the language of binary monotonic sequences. We prove general results and identify several classes of minimal simplicial complexes generating this language. 2026-01-09T09:42:17Z Mathieu Hoyrup http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.06489v4 An Incentive-Compatible Semi-Parallel Proof-of-Work Protocol 2026-01-08T00:49:32Z Parallel Proof-of-Work (PoW) protocols have been suggested in the literature to improve the safety guarantees, transaction throughput and confirmation latencies of Nakamoto consensus. In this work, we first consider the existing parallel PoW protocols and develop hard-coded incentive attack structures. Our theoretical results and simulations show that the existing parallel PoW protocols are more vulnerable to incentive attacks than the Nakamoto consensus, e.g., attacks have smaller profitability threshold and they result in higher relative rewards. Next, we introduce a voting-based semi-parallel PoW protocol that outperforms both Nakamoto consensus and the existing parallel PoW protocols from most practical perspectives such as communication overheads, throughput, transaction conflicts, incentive compatibility of the protocol as well as a fair distribution of transaction fees among the voters and the leaders. We use state-of-the-art analysis to evaluate the consistency of the protocol and consider Markov decision process (MDP) models to substantiate our claims about the resilience of our protocol against incentive attacks. 2025-08-08T17:57:35Z Mustafa Doger Sennur Ulukus http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.11820v5 Toward P vs NP: An Observer-Theoretic Separation via SPDP Rank and a ZFC-Equivalent Foundation within the N-Frame Model 2026-01-08T00:31:00Z We present a self-contained separation framework for P vs NP developed entirely within ZFC. The approach consists of: (i) a deterministic, radius-1 compilation from uniform polynomial-time Turing computation to local sum-of-squares (SoS) polynomials with polylogarithmic contextual entanglement width (CEW); (ii) a formal Width-to-Rank upper bound for the resulting SPDP matrices at matching parameters; (iii) an NP-side identity-minor lower bound in the same encoding; and (iv) a rank-monotone, instance-uniform extraction map from the compiled P-side polynomials to the NP family. Together these yield a contradiction under the assumption P = NP, establishing a separation. We develop a correspondence between CEW, viewed as a quantitative measure of computational contextuality, and SPDP rank, yielding a unified criterion for complexity separation. We prove that bounded-CEW observers correspond to polynomial-rank computations (the class P), while unbounded CEW characterizes the class NP. This implies that exponential SPDP rank for #3SAT and related hard families forces P != NP within the standard framework of complexity theory. Key technical components include: (1) constructive lower bounds on SPDP rank via Ramanujan-Tseitin expander families; (2) a non-circular reduction from Turing-machine computation to low-rank polynomial evaluation; (3) a codimension-collapse lemma ensuring that rank amplification cannot occur within polynomial resources; and (4) proofs of barrier immunity against relativization, natural proofs, and algebrization. The result is a complete ZFC proof architecture whose primitives and compositions are fully derived, with community verification and machine-checked formalization left as future work. 2025-11-30T12:20:03Z 208 pages, 15 Tables, 18 Figures Darren J. Edwards http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.04169v1 A Polynomial Kernel for Face Cover on Non-Embedded Planar Graphs 2026-01-07T18:36:25Z Given a planar graph, a subset of its vertices called terminals, and $k \in \mathbb{N}$, the Face Cover Number problem asks whether the terminals lie on the boundaries of at most $k$ faces of some embedding of the input graph. When a plane graph is given in the input, the problem is known to have a polynomial kernel~\cite{GarneroST17}. In this paper, we present the first polynomial kernel for Face Cover Number when the input is a planar graph (without a fixed embedding). Our approach overcomes the challenge of not having a predefined set of face boundaries by building a kernel bottom-up on an SPR-tree while preserving the essential properties of the face cover along the way. 2026-01-07T18:36:25Z Accepted to STACS 2026 Thekla Hamm Sukanya Pandey Krisztina Szilágyi http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.03488v1 Exact Dominion of the Prism Graph: Enumeration by Congruence Class via Cyclic Words 2026-01-07T00:57:16Z Let G_n = C_n square P_2 denote the prism (circular ladder) graph on 2n vertices. By encoding column configurations as cyclic words, domination is reduced to local Boolean constraints on adjacent factors. This framework yields explicit formulas for the dominion zeta(G_n), stratified by n mod 4, with the exceptional cases n in {3, 6} confirmed computationally. Together with the known domination numbers gamma(G_n), these results expose distinct arithmetic regimes governing optimal domination, ranging from rigid forcing to substantial enumerative flexibility, and motivate quantitative parameters for assessing structural robustness in parametric graph families. 2026-01-07T00:57:16Z 17 pages, 3 tables Julian Allagan http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.03485v1 Four Dominion Growth Regimes in Trees: Forcing, Fibonacci Enumeration, Periodicity, and Stability 2026-01-07T00:47:54Z We study the dominion zeta(G), defined as the number of minimum dominating sets of a graph G, and analyze how local forcing and boundary effects control the flexibility of optimal domination in trees. For path-based pendant constructions, we identify a sharp forcing threshold: attaching a single pendant vertex to each path vertex yields complete independence with zeta = 2^gamma, whereas attaching two or more pendant vertices forces a unique minimum dominating set. Between these extremes, sparse pendant patterns produce intermediate behavior: removing endpoint pendants gives zeta = 2^(gamma - 2), while alternating pendant attachments induce Fibonacci growth zeta asymptotic to phi^gamma, where phi is the golden ratio. For complete binary trees T_h, we establish a rigid period-3 law zeta(T_h) in {1, 3} despite exponential growth in |V(T_h)|. We further prove a sharp stability bound under leaf deletions, zeta(T_h - X) <= 2^{m_1(X)} zeta(T_h), where m_1(X) counts parents that lose exactly one child; in particular, deleting a single leaf preserves the domination number and exactly doubles the dominion. 2026-01-07T00:47:54Z 12 pages, 1 figure, 2 tables Julian Allagan Erin Gray Jennifer Sawyer Gabrielle Morgan http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.03129v1 Density Matters: A Complexity Dichotomy of Deleting Edges to Bound Subgraph Density 2026-01-06T16:02:08Z We study $τ$-Bounded-Density Edge Deletion ($τ$-BDED), where given an undirected graph $G$, the task is to remove as few edges as possible to obtain a graph $G'$ where no subgraph of $G'$ has density more than $τ$. The density of a (sub)graph is the number of edges divided by the number of vertices. This problem was recently introduced and shown to be NP-hard for $τ\in \{2/3, 3/4, 1 + 1/25\}$, but polynomial-time solvable for $τ\in \{0,1/2,1\}$ [Bazgan et al., JCSS 2025]. We provide a complete dichotomy with respect to the target density $τ$: 1. If $2τ\in \mathbb{N}$ (half-integral target density) or $τ< 2/3$, then $τ$-BDED is polynomial-time solvable. 2. Otherwise, $τ$-BDED is NP-hard. We complement the NP-hardness with fixed-parameter tractability with respect to the treewidth of $G$. Moreover, for integral target density $τ\in \mathbb{N}$, we show $τ$-BDED to be solvable in randomized $O(m^{1 + o(1)})$ time. Our algorithmic results are based on a reduction to a new general flow problem on restricted networks that, depending on $τ$, can be solved via Maximum s-t-Flow or General Factors. We believe this connection between these variants of flow and matching to be of independent interest. 2026-01-06T16:02:08Z to appear at STACS 2026 Matthias Bentert Tom-Lukas Breitkopf Vincent Froese Anton Herrmann André Nichterlein http://arxiv.org/abs/2501.15515v5 Degree Realization by Bipartite Multigraphs 2026-01-06T11:24:20Z The problem of realizing a given degree sequence by a multigraph can be thought of as a relaxation of the classical degree realization problem (where the realizing graph is simple). This paper concerns the case where the realizing multigraph is required to be bipartite. The problem of characterizing sequences that can be realized by a bipartite graph has two variants. In the simpler one, termed BDR$^P$, the partition of the sequence into two sides is given as part of the input. A complete characterization for realizability in this variant was given by Gale and Ryser over sixty years ago. However, the variant where the partition is not given, termed BDR, is still open. For bipartite multigraph realizations, there are also two variants. For BDR$^P$, where the partition is given as part of the input, a characterization was known for determining whether there is a multigraph realization whose underlying graph is bipartite, such that the maximum number of copies of an edge is at most $r$. We present a characterization for determining if there is a bipartite multigraph realization such that the total number of excess edges is at most $t$. We show that optimizing these two measures may lead to different realizations, and that optimizing by one measure may increase the other substantially. As for the variant BDR, where the partition is not given, we show that determining whether a given (single) sequence admits a bipartite multigraph realization is NP-hard. Moreover, we show that this hardness result extends to any graph family which is a sub-family of bipartite graphs and a super-family of paths. On the positive side, we provide an algorithm that computes optimal realizations for the case where the number of balanced partitions is polynomial, and present sufficient conditions for the existence of bipartite multigraph realizations that depend only on the largest degree of the sequence. 2025-01-26T13:15:04Z Discrete Mathematics & Theoretical Computer Science, vol. 28:2, Graph Theory (January 7, 2026) dmtcs:15158 Amotz Bar-Noy Toni Bohnlein David Peleg Dror Rawitz 10.46298/dmtcs.15158 http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.02685v1 Branching $k$-path vertex cover of forests 2026-01-06T03:37:25Z We define a set $P$ to be a branching $k$-path vertex cover of an undirected forest $F$ if all leaves and isolated vertices (vertices of degree at most $1$) of $F$ belong to $P$ and every path on $k$ vertices (of length $k-1$) contains either a branching vertex (a vertex of degree at least $3$) or a vertex belonging to $P$. We define the branching $k$-path vertex cover number of an undirected forest $F$, denoted by $ψ_b(F,k)$, to be the number of vertices in the smallest branching $k$-path vertex cover of $F$. These notions for a rooted directed forest are defined similarly, with natural adjustments. We prove the lower bound $ψ_b(F,k) \geq \frac{n+3k-1}{2k}$ for undirected forests, the lower bound $ψ_b(F,k) \geq \frac{n+k}{2k}$ for rooted directed forests, and that both of them are tight. 2026-01-06T03:37:25Z 6 pages Mikhail Makarov http://arxiv.org/abs/2504.17286v2 Vertex evaluation of multiplex graphs using Forman Curvature 2026-01-06T01:09:36Z The identification of vertices that play a central role in network analysis is a fundamental challenge. Although traditional centrality measures have been extensively employed for this purpose, the increasing complexity of modern networks necessitates the use of sophisticated metrics. The concept of Forman curvature has recently garnered significant attention as a promising approach. We define the Forman curvature for multiplex graphs, which are a category of complex networks characterized by multiple layers of connections between nodes. We then prove the key properties of the Forman curvature in the context of multiplex graphs and show its usefulness in identifying vertices occupying central positions within these networks. Moreover, through a series of comparative experiments with traditional graph features and graph kernels, we demonstrate that the Forman curvature can function as an effective metric for classifying the overall structure of networks. 2025-04-24T06:28:14Z 26 pages, 9 figures, 3 tables Taiki Yamada http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.06334v3 Optimal Average Disk-Inspection via Fermat's Principle 2026-01-05T22:57:14Z This work resolves the optimal average-case cost of the Disk-Inspection problem, a variant of Bellman's 1955 lost-in-a-forest problem. In Disk-Inspection, a mobile agent starts at the center of a unit disk and follows a trajectory that inspects perimeter points whenever the disk does not obstruct visibility. The worst-case cost was solved optimally in 1957 by Isbell, but the average-case version remained open, with heuristic upper bounds proposed by Gluss in 1961 and improved only recently. Our approach applies Fermat's Principle of Least Time to a recently proposed discretization framework, showing that optimal solutions are captured by a one-parameter family of recurrences independent of the discretization size. In the continuum limit these recurrences give rise to a single-parameter optimal control problem, whose trajectories coincide with limiting solutions of the original Disk-Inspection problem. A crucial step is proving that the optimal initial condition generates a trajectory that avoids the unit disk, thereby validating the optics formulation and reducing the many-variable optimization to a rigorous one-parameter problem. In particular, this disproves Gluss's conjecture that optimal trajectories must touch the disk. Our analysis determines the exact optimal average-case inspection cost, equal to $3.549259\ldots$ and certified to at least six digits of accuracy. 2025-09-08T04:43:28Z 29 pages, 7 figures Konstantinos Georgiou http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.21423v3 Constructive l2-Discrepancy Minimization with Additive Deviations 2026-01-05T19:04:12Z The \emph{signed series} problem in the $\ell_2$ norm asks, given set of vectors $v_1,\ldots,v_n\in \mathbf{R}^d$ having at most unit $\ell_2$ norm, does there always exist a series $(\varepsilon_i)_{i\in [n]}$ of $\pm 1$ signs such that for all $i\in [n]$, $\max_{i\in [n]} \|\sum_{j=1}^i \varepsilon_i v_i\|_2 = O(\sqrt{d})$. A result of Banaszczyk [2012, \emph{Rand. Struct. Alg.}] states that there exist signs $\varepsilon_i\in \{-1,1\},\; i\in [n]$ such that $\max_{i\in [n]} \|\sum_{j=1}^i \varepsilon_i v_i\|_2 = O(\sqrt{d+\log n})$. The best constructive bound known so far is of $O(\sqrt{d\log n})$, by Bansal and Garg [2017, \emph{STOC.}, 2019, \emph{SIAM J. Comput.}]. We give a polynomial-time randomized algorithm to find signs $x(i) \in \{-1,1\},\; i\in [n]$ such that \[ \max_{i\in [n]} \|\sum_{j=1}^i x(i)v_i\|_2 = O(\sqrt{d + \log^2 n}) = O(\sqrt{d}+\log n).\] By the constructive reduction of Harvey and Samadi [\emph{COLT}, 2014], this also yields a constructive bound of $O(\sqrt{d}+\log n)$ for the Steinitz problem in the $\ell_2$-norm. Thus, we algorithmically achieve Banaszczyk's bounds for both problems when $d \geq \log^2n$, which also matches the conjectured bounds. Our algorithm is based on the framework on Bansal and Garg, together with a new analysis involving $(i)$ additional linear and spectral orthogonality constraints during the construction of the covariance matrix of the random walk steps, which allow us to control the quadratic variation in the linear as well as the quadratic components of the discrepancy increment vector, alongwith $(ii)$ a ``Freedman-like" version of the Hanson-Wright concentration inequality, for filtration-dependent sums of subgaussian chaoses. 2025-08-29T08:49:41Z There is a fatal error in the proof of Lemma 15 Kunal Dutta