https://arxiv.org/api/d3/y6kdlKJC7YA8LczC89QpdPwg 2026-09-10T21:19:06Z 16091 75 15 http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.04257v1 2026-09-01T19:57:46Z

For a finite simple graph $G$ with at least one edge, the bondage number $b(G)$ is the least number of edges whose deletion increases the domination number $γ(G)$. Teschner conjectured that $b(G)\le \tfrac32Δ(G)$ for every graph $G$. We disprove this conjecture by giving a connected cubic bipartite graph on eighteen vertices with \[ γ(G)=6 \qquad\text{and}\qquad b(G)=5. \] The domination number is established by a complete counting argument across the bipartition. An explicit five-edge deletion raises the domination number from six to seven. For the matching lower bound, we give an exact finite certificate: the graph has 297 minimum dominating sets, and deleting any one of its $\binom{27}{4}=17{,}550$ four-edge subsets leaves at least one of those sets dominating. The enumeration is deterministic, uses only exact integer and set operations, and is reproduced by the complete standard-library verifier included in the appendix.

2026-09-01T19:57:46Z 9 pages, no figures; complete Python 3 verifier included in the appendix Yousof Yavari http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.23500v4 2026-09-01T16:00:46Z

Let $λ(n)=(-1)^{Ω(n)}$ be the Liouville function. We prove a fixed power-logarithmic bound for its logarithmically weighted two-point correlations across the full shift range. There is an absolute $c>0$ such that every sufficiently large $x$ admits a single set $\mathcal E_x\subseteq[1,x]$ with $|\mathcal E_x\cap[1,H]|\ll_A H(\log x)^{-A}$ $(1\le H\le x)$ for every fixed $A>0$, while $\max_{\substack{1\le h\le x\ h\notin\mathcal E_x}}\sup_{1\le y\le x}\left|\sum_{n\le y}\frac{λ(n)λ(n+h)}{n}\right|\ll(\log x)^{1-c}$. The same exceptional-set formulation extends, without an upper cutoff, to all positive integer shifts. Earlier full-range theorems average over the shift; here a fixed saving holds pointwise outside one set whose density in every initial segment is smaller than every fixed negative power of $\log x$. The new middle-scale argument combines a general-good-modulus Liouville deletion lemma with a linear bad-modulus score, a progression Fourier estimate, and a Mellin-localized dilation that separates divisor-dependent endpoints. Maximal fixed-moment bounds evacuate the low prefix and control the long-shift range. Assuming GRH for primitive Dirichlet $L$-functions, we also prove, uniformly for $h\in\mathbb N$ and $1\le y\le x$, $\left|\sum_{n\le y}\frac{λ(n)λ(n+h)}{n}\right|\le\log(2\min{h,y})+O((\log x)^{1-c_{\mathrm G}})$ for an absolute $c_{\mathrm G}>0$, with no exceptional shifts.

2026-08-24T17:03:54Z 84 pages. Major revision with strengthened main results and expanded proofs Jizhou Guo http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.09000v3 2026-09-01T15:00:05Z

We revisit the family of "napkin problems" first discussed by Peter Winkler in his 2004 puzzle book and discussed subsequently in several papers. This family of problems involves diners being seated around a circular table in which napkins are placed between the seats, so it is ambiguous which napkin belongs to which seat. The problems seek to quantify the proportion of diners who end up with no napkin under a variety of assumptions, one of which is that the diners have an adaptive adversary known as "the malicious maitre d'," who seeks to maximize the number of napkinless diners. Winkler's original strategy for the adaptive maitre d' was shown to be suboptimal in 2023 when Acton, Petersen, Shirman, and Toal presented a better (yet also suboptimal) strategy. In this paper we demonstrate an optimal strategy for the malicious maitre d' and compute the expected proportion of napkinless diners as a function of the probability of a diner taking the left napkin. Interestingly, the strategy does not depend on the exact probability; rather, it only depends on which napkin (left or right) the diners tend to prefer.

2024-07-12T05:37:15Z 14 pages, 5 figures Tejo V. Madhavarapu T. Kyle Petersen http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.01682v1 2026-09-01T13:05:28Z

Albertson conjectured that every graph with chromatic number r has crossing number at least cr(K_r). The conjecture was verified for r <= 12 by Albertson, Cranston and Fox, for r <= 16 by Bar'at and T'oth, for r <= 18 by Ackerman, and recently for r <= 24 by Cranston, who reduced the remaining cases r in {25, 26} to three orders. We settle those three orders, so that Albertson's Conjecture holds for all r <= 26. Only published results are used, and an appendix reproves the range 19 <= r <= 24 so that the case r <= 26 does not rest on unpublished work. We also show that if chi(G) = 27 and cr(G) < cr(K_27), then G has a 27-critical subgraph of order 53 or 54 whose complement is connected.

2026-09-01T13:05:28Z 8 pages Ankan Sadhu http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.23906v2 2026-09-01T00:09:24Z

Wills conjectured that, for any non-zero integers $u_1,\ldots,u_k$, there is a real number $t$ such that, for all $i=1,\ldots,k$, \[\lVert tu_i\rVert\geq\frac{1}{k+1},\] where $\lVert x\rVert$ is the distance from $x$ to the closest integer. This statement is known as the Lonely Runner Conjecture. A computational method developed by Rosenfeld and the second author verified the conjecture for $k\leq9$. We further refine this method with new sieving techniques and employ a polynomial method argument to show that any $(u_1,\ldots,u_k)\equiv(1,2,\ldots,k)\pmod{p}$ with $\gcd(u_1,\ldots,u_k)=1$ satisfies the conjecture when $k+1$ and $p > k^2+k$ are both odd primes. Ultimately, we provide a computer-assisted proof of the Lonely Runner Conjecture for $k\in\{10,11,12\}$.

2026-04-26T22:50:05Z Touch Sungkawichai Tanupat Trakulthongchai http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.00394v1 2026-08-31T21:23:53Z

Pseudosimilar vertices are vertices in distinct automorphism orbits whose deletions produce isomorphic graphs. Classical work has studied the existence, group-theoretic origin, and construction of large sets of such vertices. We ask a different recursive question: how long can one repeatedly delete a vertex that is pseudosimilar at the moment of deletion? We define the pseudosimilarity depth of a graph and construct connected graphs in which this process continues through all but a sublinear number of vertices. A two-clock construction gives a square-root deficit uniformly in the order, while a Chinese-remainder construction with many cyclic clocks yields an infinite family of asymmetric graphs with only a polylogarithmic number of vertices left outside the active chain. The mechanism realizes pseudosimilarity by breaking a long hidden automorphism orbit and enlarging the break one vertex at a time. Thus pseudosimilarity can persist through an asymptotically full sequence of vertex deletions, even though every graph encountered in the main construction is asymmetric.

2026-08-31T21:23:53Z Sergey Ivanov http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.16956v2 2026-08-31T20:17:21Z

We consider the problem of packing edge-disjoint Steiner forests in a graph. The input consists of a multi-graph $G=(V,E)$ and a collection of $t$ vertex subsets $S = \{S_1,S_2,\ldots,S_t\}$. A Steiner forest for $S$, also called an $S$-forest, is a forest of $G$ in which each $S_i$ is connected. In the case where $t=1$, this is the Steiner Tree packing problem. Kriesell's conjecture postulates that $2k$-edge-connectivity of $S_1$ is sufficient to find $k$ edge-disjoint $S_1$-trees. Lau showed that $24k$-edge-connectivity suffices for the Steiner Tree packing problem, which was improved to $6.5k$ by West and Wu and $5k+4$ by Devos, McDonald and Pivotto. In his thesis, Lau asserts that for the Steiner Forest problem, if each $S_i$ is $30k$-edge-connected in $G$, then there exist $k$ edge-disjoint $S$-forests. However, Lau's proof relies on an intermediate theorem called the Extension Theorem, which in this paper we will demonstrate has a gap by providing a counterexample to Lau's Extension Theorem. Furthermore, we will resolve this gap by correcting Lau's proof to show that $32k$-edge-connectivity of each $S_i$ suffices to pack $k$ $S$-forests. More careful analysis yields that $31k$-edge-connectivity of each $S_i$ is sufficient when $k \geq 8$.

2026-03-17T01:39:04Z 19 pages, 1 figure Jinghan A Zeng http://arxiv.org/abs/1107.3279v21 2026-08-31T19:41:36Z

Probability distributions and the rules of inclusion-exclusion apply to derive general results about graph theory and number theory. In order to apply the rules of inclusion-exclusion in the setting some of these problems require, it is necessary to use specific equations and make several assumptions about integration and measure of the probability distributions.

2011-07-17T06:23:00Z The submission is a correction of version 16 Jesse Gilbert http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.00240v1 2026-08-31T18:43:57Z

Friedgut conjectured that an increasing family in the $p$-biased discrete cube with bounded relative boundary can be approximated arbitrarily well by one whose minimal elements have bounded size, with a bound independent of the dimension and the bias (J. Amer. Math. Soc. 12 (1999)). We prove this conjecture by showing that, for $0<p\leq 1/2$, every increasing Boolean function with total resampling influence at most $K$ is $\varepsilon$-close under $μ_p^n$ to a monotone DNF of width $\exp(O((K+1)^2/\varepsilon^2))$. A separate high-bias argument completes the proof for all $p\in(0,1)$. Our proof builds on Hatami's pseudo-junta theorem (Ann. of Math. 176 (2012)). Tracking Hatami's construction isolates an adaptive representation with increasing local activations and dimension-free arity and multiplicity-counted load bounds. Our main new ingredient is a bias-matched randomized shifting procedure that converts the pseudo-junta approximator into an increasing function while retaining exact measurability with respect to a controlled forced refinement of its adaptive representation. From the resulting monotone adaptive representation, we extract positive certificates and truncate them to obtain the required narrow DNF.

2026-08-31T18:43:57Z Chenghua Liu Boning Meng http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.22518v2 2026-08-31T17:57:43Z

We compute new lower bounds for determinants of $\{\pm 1\}$-matrices of orders $n=51$, $n=107$, $n=111$, $n=115$, and $n=119$, improving previous recorded bounds by $3.1\%$, $0.44\%$, $1.26\%$, $1.68\%$, and $2.12\%$, respectively. We provide the data necessary to construct these matrices.

2026-08-23T17:37:14Z Updated with new records. 6 pages, 1 figure Giorgi Butbaia Pragatheeswaran Vipulanandan Justin Tan Xiaoyu Huang Toby Saunders-A'Court Lucas Fagan Davide Passaro Michele Tarquini Sergei Gukov http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.27416v2 2026-08-31T16:56:15Z

The Non-Cancelling Intersections (NCI) conjecture of Amarilli, Monet and Suciu [arXiv:2401.16210] states that the union of a finite family of sets can always be built from its algebraically non-cancelling intersections using only disjoint unions and subset complements. In Wilhelm [arXiv:2608.19414] the conjecture was shown to fail when the witnessing dot-algebra expression is required to be left-linear. Here we remove that restriction and show that the conjecture is false in general: there is a finite lattice admitting no dot-algebra representation of its top element whatsoever. The counterexample is a lattice $P_{p,\mathfrak{m}}$ as in Wilhelm [arXiv:2608.19414], and the argument differs in only two ways. First, we replace the sequential "toggle game" of Wilhelm [arXiv:2608.19414] by a corresponding tree-shaped object, the plane tree, which stands to dot-algebra trees as the toggle game stands to left-linear ones. Second, we use a marked plane in which there is no admissible set of any size between $2p$ and $4p$, which also removes the need for the Erdős--Beck theorem and for the arithmetic Nullstellensatz. Consequently $p$ need not be astronomically large: every prime $p \ge 10^{5}$ works.

2026-08-27T17:42:42Z v2: added a "Note added" reporting an independent equivalent result by A. Walz and comparing the two arguments; added a worked example of a winning plane da-tree over $\mathbb{F}_3^2$ (new figure); renamed "plane tree" to "plane da-tree" throughout; minor corrections and rewording; title hyphenation fixed Hermann Wilhelm http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.30894v1 2026-08-31T14:47:22Z

A finite connected graph is rarely a Cayley graph. We measure how far it is from being one: given $G$ with $n$ vertices and $m$ edges, how few edges must be added, or added and deleted, before the result is a Cayley graph of an abelian group of order $n$ on the same vertex set? This defines two invariants, the completion number $γ^{+}$ (additions only) and the Cayley edit distance $γ_{\triangle}$ (both), each normalized by $m$. We show that deciding the edit version is NP-complete already for a fixed cyclic host, by a reduction from Hamiltonian Cycle in which the edit cost of a labeling is $n+m-2k$ when it realizes a longest path with $k$ edges; the optimal cost is $m-n+2pp(G)$, bounded in polynomial time by the matching number. We prove that irregularity alone forces $γ^{+}(G)\ge nΔ^{*}/(2m)-1$, where $Δ^{*}$ is the least $d\geΔ$ with $nd$ even, computable in linear time from the degree sequence; we characterize equality exactly. It is attained on the star, where $γ^{+}(K_{1,q})=(q-1)/2$ and the star maximizes $γ^{+}$, while $γ_{\triangle}$ stays bounded by an absolute constant. We determine paths and grids exactly, $γ^{+}(P_n)=γ^{+}(P_n\,\square\,P_n)=1/(n-1)$, and show $γ_{\triangle}(K_{1,q})\to 2$, not the $3/2$ suggested by the additive case. We report an exhaustive certified census of all $995$ connected graphs on at most seven vertices. The degree bound is attained on $89.4\%$ and the two invariants separate strictly on $84.7\%$, though both rates vary sharply with order: attainment $100\%,100\%,84.8\%,89.7\%$ and separation $0\%,61.9\%,73.2\%,87.7\%$ for $n=4,5,6,7$, dominated by the $853$ graphs on seven vertices. The star uniquely maximizes both. Edit count and the bi-Lipschitz distortion of the completed host are independent, moving oppositely on stars and paths.Data and certificates at doi:10.5281/zenodo.21852006.

2026-08-31T14:47:22Z Rigobert Fokam Souop Laurent Bitjoka http://arxiv.org/abs/1707.09817v2 2026-08-31T12:22:30Z

We continue research into a well-studied family of problems that ask whether the vertices of a graph can be partitioned into sets $A$ and~$B$, where $A$ is an independent set and $B$ induces a graph from some specified graph class ${\cal G}$. We let ${\cal G}$ be the class of $k$-degenerate graphs. This problem is known to be polynomial-time solvable if $k=0$ (bipartite graphs) and NP-complete if $k=1$ (near-bipartite graphs) even for graphs of maximum degree $4$. Yang and Yuan [DM, 2006] showed that the $k=1$ case is polynomial-time solvable for graphs of maximum degree $3$. This also follows from a result of Catlin and Lai [DM, 1995]. We consider graphs of maximum degree $k+2$ on $n$ vertices. We show how to find $A$ and $B$ in $O(n)$ time for $k=1$, and in $O(n^2)$ time for $k\geq 2$. Together, these results provide an algorithmic version of a result of Catlin [JCTB, 1979] and also provide an algorithmic version of a generalization of Brook's Theorem, which was proven in a more general way by Borodin, Kostochka and Toft [DM, 2000] and Matamala [JGT, 2007]. Moreover, the two results enable us to complete the complexity classification of an open problem of Feghali et al. [JGT, 2016]: finding a path in the vertex colouring reconfiguration graph between two given $\ell$-colourings of a graph of maximum degree $k$.

2017-07-31T12:32:54Z Marthe Bonamy Konrad K. Dabrowski Carl Feghali Matthew Johnson Daniel Paulusma http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.30580v1 2026-08-31T10:53:52Z

Every fixed first-order sentence $\varphi$ determines an enumerative sequence $n\mapsto\mathrm{FOMC}(\varphi,n)$, counting its models on the labeled domain $[n]$. We study the complexity of these sequences when logical specifications may use genuine unary function symbols and hence nested terms $x,f(x),f^2(x),\ldots$. We first prove that, for every fixed sentence $\varphi\in\mathrm{C}^1_{=}[f]$, with one unary function and an arbitrary finite relational vocabulary, $\mathrm{FOMC}(\varphi,n)$ is computable in time polynomial in $n$. By contrast, permitting either a second variable or a second unary function already yields hardness. Without counting quantifiers, there is a fixed sentence in $\mathrm{FO}^2_{=}[f]$ whose model-counting function is $\#\mathrm{P}_1$-complete. With one variable and two unary functions, there is a fixed constant-free universal sentence in $\mathrm{FO}^1_{=}[f,g]$, using only unary predicates besides $f$ and $g$, whose model-counting function is again $\#\mathrm{P}_1$-complete. We also relate labeled and unlabeled enumeration exactly. For every relational sentence $\varphi$, we construct an extension $\varphi_{\mathrm{aut}}$ in which a unary function records an automorphism and $\mathrm{FOMC}(\varphi_{\mathrm{aut}},n)=n!\cdot\mathrm{UFOMC}(\varphi,n)$, where $\mathrm{UFOMC}(\varphi,n)$ denotes the number of $n$-element models of $\varphi$ up to isomorphism. Thus automorphism marking gives a one-query exact reduction from unlabeled to labeled model counting at the same domain size. Over relational vocabularies of maximum arity at most $k$, where $k\geq2$, eliminating the auxiliary function yields single-query reductions from unlabeled $\mathrm{FO}^k_{=}$ and $\mathrm{C}^k$ model counting to labeled $\mathrm{FO}^{k+1}_{=}$ and $\mathrm{C}^{k+1}$ model counting, respectively.

2026-08-31T10:53:52Z 61 pages Ondřej Kuželka http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.30353v1 2026-08-31T07:09:24Z

Smith's conjecture asserts that in every $k$-connected graph with $k\geq 2$, any two longest cycles intersect in at least $k$ vertices. In this work, we establish an $Ω(k^{8/11})$ bound for this conjecture, improving upon the $Ω(k^{2/3})$ bound of Ma and Zhao. Our proof combines a Ramsey theoretic refinement of the traditional Turán-type approach with computer search.

2026-08-31T07:09:24Z 9 pages, 2 figures. Comments welcome! Douglas M. Chen