https://arxiv.org/api/7dd/Kife46i2Z/IXnwYSRTU6phc2026-11-12T03:27:34Z12715015http://arxiv.org/abs/2611.14317v1MammothDP: Private Boosted Decision Trees Ready for Trusted Hardware and Leakage-free Hyperparameters2026-11-10T16:44:28ZData spaces like the European Health Data Space (EHDS) require the protection of sensitive data in studies during the data's processing and the study's release alike. In this work, we investigate how to implement this mandate using established trusted execution environments (TEEs) and timing side-channel hardening to protect the processing even under a compromised server, and the state-of-the-art differential privacy (DP) notion to protect the release of studies on tabular data. This combined setup could seem to complete the picture, but in fact raises unexpected security challenges that we mitigate by introducing MammothDP: a significant milestone towards a holistic machine learning system based on the recent gradient boosted decision tree learner S-BDT that is provably DP if used within a privacy filter, timing side-channel hardened, and deployed on a TEE. To achieve a strong privacy-utility tradeoff, we introduce two novel components: an early stopping criterion that adaptively selects the number of trees without any privacy overhead, and an improved rollback protection that is no longer vulnerable under timing side-channel attacks.2026-11-10T16:44:28ZMoritz KirschteThorsten PeinemannKari KostiainenJan WichelmannThomas EisenbarthEsfandiar Mohammadihttp://arxiv.org/abs/2611.10398v2Measuring Tabular Data Formats Cold: A Replicated Cold-Cache Benchmark of Serialization, Scan, and Index Performance on Real Datasets2026-11-10T16:09:16ZChoosing a file format for tabular data is a routine engineering decision, yet published comparisons often time reads served from the operating-system page cache, use one session, or rely on a single synthetic dataset. This article benchmarks fifteen format and access-path configurations (CSV, JSON Lines, Pickle, Feather, Parquet, ORC, DuckDB, and SQLite, with several access paths) on two real public datasets, New York City taxi trips and United States airline on-time records, at 50,000 to 3 million rows. Every measurement uses an explicitly cold cache, randomized execution order, and three independent sessions (with restarts on the laptop), and is analyzed with bootstrap intervals and Holm-adjusted permutation tests. Parquet answered a filtered aggregation 2.6 to 11 times faster than CSV, while JSON Lines was 10 to 27 times slower. A secondary index made SQLite queries 2.6 to 4.8 times slower on randomly ordered data and helped only on data sorted by the filtered column, at low selectivity. A row filter inside the Parquet reader was significantly faster than a projected scan on flight data from one million rows and on both datasets at three million, and row-group skipping needs several row groups, which the default writer produced only at 3 million rows. A 4 GB Linux host ran out of memory on configurations that a 24 GB laptop completed and reversed some orderings, such as Pickle versus Parquet. Code, derived data, and raw timings are released.2026-11-07T02:10:53ZSubmitted to IEEE Open Journal of the Computer SocietyAsra FathimaKristoffer Robertshttp://arxiv.org/abs/2611.07342v2Selective Retrieval Routing for Multi-Violation Knowledge Graph Repair2026-11-10T15:24:20ZKnowledge graphs often contain missing or inconsistent facts that undermine the applications built on them. Schema validation detects such violations but does not identify which of several valid repairs recovers the intended graph. External corpora can supply the evidence needed to identify the intended repair, but retrieving from them is costly and not always successful. We propose a framework for selective retrieval in iterative graph repair. An LLM repair agent explores and edits the graph, while a router controls its access to a researcher agent that retrieves external evidence. We extend a violation-injection framework to generate cases with multiple compatible violations and known reference repairs. The agent's repair outcomes on these cases provide supervision for training the deployment-specific router. On two building-automation datasets, researcher access improves repairs for some violations and degrades them for others, with effects differing across deployments. The router uses fewer repair-time tokens than always enabling access in all six evaluation suites. It achieves higher repair $F_1$ than always disabling access in five of six suites.2026-11-05T02:29:58ZTung-Wei LinGabe FierroHan LiTianzhen HongPierluigi NuzzoAlberto Sangiovanni-Vincentellihttp://arxiv.org/abs/2605.15790v2Fairness-Aware Retrieval Optimization for Retrieval-Augmented Generation2026-11-10T12:08:34ZRetrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) grounds large language models (LLMs) in external knowledge, but the retrieved documents can systematically skew generated answers toward one group. This effect is difficult to analyze and control in top-k settings, where several documents at different context positions jointly shape the output. We present a three-stage framework for fairness-aware retrieval in top-k RAG. First, a probabilistic reranker sets the group composition of the retrieved context at each position, enabling controlled perturbation of retrieval bias without modifying the retriever. Second, we show that output bias is well approximated by a position-weighted linear function of position-wise retrieval bias, revealing model-specific positional sensitivities. Third, we use this model to formulate retrieval as an optimization problem that trades off relevance against predicted output bias, and propose FARO, a scalable solution to that problem which decomposes the globally coupled quadratic objective into independent per-query assignment problems through a Fenchel--Legendre dual reformulation. Experiments with four open LLMs, and political and gender bias as use cases show that the linear model predicts output bias on unseen configurations in 17 of 24 settings. FARO substantially reduces output bias in most settings, while, compared with a linear-programming baseline, FARO achieves similar relevance, remains feasible where the baseline does not, and scales better to larger query sets and candidate pools.2026-05-15T09:47:44ZYingqi ZhaoVasilis EfthymiouJyrki NummenmaaKostas Stefanidishttp://arxiv.org/abs/2607.25891v3Messier: A High-Resolution Corpus for Cross-Benchmark Agent Evaluation2026-11-10T10:32:04ZComprehensively evaluating AI agents across interactive environments is difficult due to fragmented tasks, scaffolds, verifiers, and scoring rules. Unfortunately, existing efforts to unify these evaluations are limited in scale and domain, making costly reruns necessary and leaving available data incomparable. We introduce Messier, a unified corpus of 923,158 records spanning 30 benchmarks, 745 agents, 11,891 tasks, and 71,969 verifiers. Messier combines public evaluation results with new runs on six underrepresented professional and scientific benchmarks, standardizing their heterogeneous components into a common schema. Using this corpus, we show that frontier progress is uneven across benchmark groups, with function-calling evaluations largely saturated, programming improving fastest, and enterprise workflows remaining most challenging. Counterfactual rescoring further shows that reported performance can be highly sensitive to how verifier results are aggregated. Finally, we derive capability scores from our corpus that correlate with Epoch's Evaluation Capability Index rankings at Spearman \r{ho} = 0.84. The scores can also be estimated for subsets defined by domain, occupation, action space, or verifier type. In essence, Messier is a reusable resource for studying agent performance at scale, and a basis for designing better evaluations.2026-07-28T15:50:19ZStefan KrsteskiCharlotte MeyerGuillaume AllegreTony O'HalloranAlexandre Sallinenhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2611.13856v1SAIL: Self-Adaptive Index Learning with Hybrid Models (Extended Version)2026-11-10T10:15:45ZLearned index structures have demonstrated a significant improvement in query performance over traditional index structures. The majority of learned indexes use a uniform node structure throughout their index structures. A few studies show that combining multiple types of node structures can lead to indexes that better adapt to local key-set distributions, hence yielding query efficiency gains. Following this line of work, we propose a learned index structure named SAIL that supports a wide range of different candidate node structures for both leaf and inner nodes, selected via cost models based on data driven approximations. We design an efficient construction algorithm that recursively partitions the key-set to be fitted by the candidate node types. Experiments demonstrate that SAIL achieves 2x improvement over existing learned indexes in query time, with similar memory consumption and index build times.2026-11-10T10:15:45ZKasun AmarasingheFarhana ChoudhuryJianzhong Qihttp://arxiv.org/abs/2611.11467v2PLDP-IDS: Personalized Local Differential Privacy for Infinite Data Stream2026-11-10T09:31:21ZStreaming data collection under local differential privacy (LDP) enables real-time analytics without a trusted curator. Existing w-event LDP mechanisms, however, impose a uniform privacy window and budget on all users, forcing everyone to adopt the most stringent requirement. We study personalized continual frequency estimation under LDP, where each user specifies her own window size and privacy budget, and identify two challenges. First, a single sampling size cannot balance sampling and perturbation errors for privacy groups with heterogeneous requirements. Second, borrowing estimates from groups with larger budgets reduces variance but introduces bias when privacy preferences correlate with the data. We first propose Optimal Population Selection (OPS) and two OPS-guided mechanisms, PLPD and PLPA. We then develop PLPD+ and PLPA+, which combine group-aware population scheduling with bias-aware cross-group fusion while preserving personalized w-event LDP. Experiments on real-world and synthetic streams show that PLPA+ reduces the AMSE of the direct personalized extension of LDP-IDS by 52.3% and 40.8% on average, respectively, and remains about $5\times$ more accurate than PLPA under strong privacy--data correlation.2026-11-08T16:00:21ZLeilei DuYikun HuXu ZhouYang CaoPeng ChengWangze NiKenli Lihttp://arxiv.org/abs/2611.13765v1Beyond Interaction Scores: Selecting Feature Interactions via Independent Replication2026-11-10T09:04:57ZLearning feature interactions is essential for accurate prediction and interpretable modeling, yet a high interaction score may reflect fitting noise rather than a reproducible pattern. Ranking methods score feature pairs but leave the cutoff to the user; testing methods set the cutoff but rely on repeated model refits or a model of the joint feature distribution. We present LENS, a model-agnostic framework for selecting feature interactions through independent replication. LENS trains two models with the same learning algorithm on disjoint data and accesses them only through predictions. For each feature pair, it removes main effects from the joint-effect surface to isolate an interaction pattern, ranks pairs by its strength, and tests whether the second model reproduces it at a meaningful strength. A single multiple-testing correction determines which pairs to retain, using only two model fits regardless of the number of features. We prove that a replication ratio alone can retain arbitrarily weak patterns shared by both fits, whereas a strength floor restores selection consistency, and we characterize when normalization in Friedman's $H^2$ reverses interaction rankings. On 16 synthetic designs, LENS matches leading model-specific ranking methods (e.g., TreeSHAP) and recovers 91% of material interactions, against 45% for the knockoff-based DIAMOND, without selecting false pairs; with 1,225 candidate pairs and no interactions, it makes substantially fewer false discoveries. On large-scale French motor insurance data, it identifies interactions documented in the actuarial literature and recovers 90% of the deviance gain obtained using all pairs. On two credit datasets, LENS selects few pairs while maintaining or slightly improving predictive performance over the additive baseline.2026-11-10T09:04:57Z20 pages. Code and results: https://github.com/JinchengGao-Infty/LENSJincheng GaoShuo Sunhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2611.13209v1ARoute: Task-Aligned Batch and Streaming Model Routing2026-11-09T20:31:42ZLanguage models increasingly power data-intensive applications, from semantic data processing to question answering and agentic workflows. Using frontier models for every request is prohibitively expensive, while relying only on smaller models reduces accuracy. We study model routing under a user-specified cost budget, aiming to maximize accuracy under task-specific correctness criteria. Existing routers fall short in two ways: pretrained routers rely on generic preference signals that may not reflect a task's own correctness criteria or a new model pair, and model cascades run the weaker model first on every request, adding sequential latency. We present ARoute, a task-aligned router that learns cost and accuracy signals to select a model for each request before inference. ARoute has two variants: ARoute-Batch operates on a batch of requests known in advance, routing requests with the greatest expected benefit to the stronger model subject to the budget, whereas ARoute-Stream processes requests online, using a threshold calibrated on a small validation set to satisfy the cost quota and dynamically adjusting it as the budget is consumed. For ARoute-Stream, we provide a finite-sample guarantee on expected normalized spending. We evaluate ARoute on MMLU-Pro, LiveCodeBench, SuperGPQA, and two value-filling tasks built from SWAN semantic query benchmark against other state-of-the-art approaches. At matched cost, ARoute-Batch achieves the highest mean accuracy in all 15 task-cost settings, improving over the strongest baseline by 4.1 percentage points on average and by up to 11.9 points. ARoute also completes a batch up to 2.8x faster than cascades.2026-11-09T20:31:42ZDaofu ZhangQingcheng ZengChunwei LiuFuheng Zhaohttp://arxiv.org/abs/2610.00038v2BuildGraph: A Synthetic Multi-Archetype Building Knowledge Graph Dataset2026-11-09T20:04:45ZSemantic querying of building knowledge graphs (KGs) underpins the integration of artificial intelligence into building operations, from natural-language access to cross-building analytics, but such KGs are rarely public owing to proprietary, security, and cost barriers. BuildGraph is a synthetic building KG dataset of 120 buildings in the Brick Schema ontology, grounded in U.S. Department of Energy prototype models and sensor-placement patterns from real buildings. It spans eight commercial building types across three ASHRAE energy-code vintages, with five realizations per archetype varying URI naming, sensor-attachment predicates, and topology. A 75-query SPARQL benchmark confirms structural completeness: BuildGraph reaches 91.5% Query Answerability Rate versus 35.8% for 59 real-world Brick files. Independently, it reproduces real buildings' sensor-type proportions on their shared vocabulary (cosine 0.86-0.94), evidence of realistic instrumentation where measurable. A downstream text-to-SPARQL experiment with Gemma 4 (26B) reaches 27.3% Row-Matching F1 (+17.5 pp over zero-shot) on 12 held-out buildings. BuildGraph gives facility managers and digital-twin developers a testbed for portable analytics and natural-language interfaces, and its dataset, generator, and benchmark are openly available at https://github.com/humanbuildingsynergy/BuildGraph.2026-09-02T21:14:26Z25 pages, 3 figures. Data paper. Dataset, generator, and 75-query SPARQL benchmark openly available at https://github.com/humanbuildingsynergy/BuildGraph and https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20015123. Re-set in the HUBS Lab paper layout (HUBS Lab Paper No. 2026-005); content unchangedWooyoung Junghttp://arxiv.org/abs/2611.13138v1Answering Conjunctive Queries over Linear Existential Rules with Transitivity2026-11-09T19:19:30ZWe study Conjunctive Query Entailment Problem over ontologies con- sisting of Linear Tuple Generating Dependencies and transitivity asser- tions. A special case of this problem has been shown to be decidable in [1]. In particular, it covers the case of linear single head TGDs with bi- nary signature. In This paper we show that The problem for linear multi head TGDs with binary signature is Ackermanian hard2026-11-09T19:19:30ZCristina FeierTomasz GogaczFilip Murlakhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2611.12817v1LUCQUE: A lung cancer screening dataset from Québec for reliable AI evaluation2026-11-09T18:21:18ZBACKGROUND: AI-based tools are expected to play a key role in lung cancer screening (LCS). The evaluation of these tools often relied on private datasets or fragmented public datasets with inconsistent availability of clinical data and expert nodule annotations. This has hindered reproducibility, comparability, and independent assessment of AI tools. To address these gaps, we present LUCQUE, a novel, large, comprehensively annotated dataset derived from LDCT lung cancer screening in Québec, which is accessible for reliable AI evaluation.
METHODS: LUCQUE was curated and is hosted on PARADIM, a digital infrastructure supporting DICOM data de-identification, annotation, long-term storage and analysis. LDCT scans and clinical information were combined to a curated collection and complemented by voxel-level, expert-derived pulmonary nodule and cyst segmentations, and Lung-RADS-based lesion characteristics. Key dataset characteristics and statistics were reported, including participant demographics, imaging parameters, radiological findings, and segmented lesion characteristics. Dataset analyses were conducted according to PARADIM's model-to-data approach, in which user code is executed on the platform such that data remains on premise.
RESULTS: LUCQUE currently comprises 1,678 LDCT baseline studies from 1,678 participants. Most studies were classified as Lung-RADS 2. A total of 1,776 pulmonary nodules and 60 cysts were annotated, with a median (interquartile range) volume of $89\,(56,\,159)\,\mathrm{mm}^3$ and $1,384\,(589,\,3793)\,\mathrm{mm}^3$ respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Compared to publicly available LCS datasets, LUCQUE currently represents the largest accessible annotated real-world LCS dataset. Access to LUCQUE is provided via a model-to-data approach, enabling privacy-preserving, reproducible, and independent real-world evaluation of AI tools in LCS.2026-11-09T18:21:18ZJohanna TopalisYannick LemaréchalGabriel CoutureHanife ErsayLoran NasBalthasar SchachtnerBastian Oliver SabelMichael IngrischPhilippe DesprésKatharina Jeblickhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2512.24078v2High-dimensional Regret Minimization2026-11-09T18:03:41ZMulti-criteria decision making over large databases is fundamental to many real-world applications. Interactive regret minimization has emerged recently as a promising approach that combines the controllable output size of top-$k$ queries with the flexibility of skyline queries, without requiring users to explicitly specify a utility function. Instead, the system iteratively presents a small set of options, learns the user's implicit preferences from their selections, and progressively refines its recommendations.
However, modern applications such as housing search and financial product selection often involve hundreds of attributes. Existing interactive methods either fail to scale to such high-dimensional data or require excessive user interaction, frequently exceeding $1000$ rounds. We address this limitation with FHDR (Fast High-Dimensional Reduction), a framework that exploits sparse linear preferences to discover key attributes through lightweight interactions. We also propose AttributeSubset, an efficient single-round algorithm that returns a compact recommendation set without further feedback. In our experiments on real datasets, FHDR completes in under $0.03$s and requires fewer than $30$ interaction rounds under the default setting.
Extensive experiments on both synthetic and real-world datasets show that FHDR outperforms the best-known baselines by at least one order of magnitude in execution time and by up to several orders of magnitude in interaction cost. These results establish FHDR as a new state of the art for scalable interactive regret minimization.2025-12-30T08:40:48ZJunyu LiaoAshwin LallMitsunori OgiharaRaymond Wonghttp://arxiv.org/abs/2508.03471v2Learned Adaptive Indexing with Updatable Learned Index2026-11-09T15:15:05ZIndexes can significantly improve search performance in databases. However, if the query workload changes frequently or new data updates occur continuously, it may not be worthwhile to build a conventional index upfront for query processing. Building a conventional fine-grained index, like B+-tree on the entire dataset can be very expensive since it may involve processing terabytes to petabytes of data. Moreover, with a traditional indexing, data ingestion tends to slow down in case of heavy updates as the index also needs to be updated. In these cases, adaptive indexing is a viable solution instead of traditional indexing. Adaptive indexing is a technique in which an index gets built on the fly as a byproduct of query processing. In recent years, research has taken on a new direction where machine learning models are employed for the purpose of indexing. These indexes, known as learned indexes, are more efficient compared to traditional indexes in terms of memory footprints and query performance. To the best of our knowledge, no learned indexes exist yet for adaptive indexing. We propose a novel learned approach, called FLAIRS, for adaptive indexing. It is built on the fly as queries are submitted. We also introduce an updatable learned index TULSI that is utilized by FLAIRS for indexing data. FLAIRS can employ a query workload prediction technique that makes future workload projection based on past workload data. We have evaluated FLAIRS against existing adaptive indexes for various query workloads. Our results show that our approach performs better than others in most cases, offering significant improvement in query performance.2025-08-05T14:05:40ZSuvam Kumar DasSuprio Rayhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2611.12539v1Dynamic Graph Indexing for Label-Filtered Approximate Nearest Neighbor Search2026-11-09T15:10:53ZApproximate nearest neighbor search (ANNS) over high-dimensional vectors is a core primitive in modern retrieval systems. In practice, objects are often also associated with labels (e.g., attributes or keywords), and retrieval must combine vector similarity with explicit label-based filtering, giving rise to label-filtered ANNS. This task is challenging because label filtering and ANNS favor very different index structures, selective filters fragment the admissible search space, and updates complicate index maintenance.
To address these challenges, we propose DYLAN, a dynamic composite index for label-filtered ANNS supporting containment, overlap, and their conjunctions and disjunctions. DYLAN organizes label sets by shared prefixes in a frequency-ordered trie and selectively shares HNSW-style graph indices across trie-induced subsets, so that each trie region has a constant-factor covering index while each object participates in only logarithmically many indices. To mitigate fragmentation, DYLAN performs a cross-region multi-graph search that exploits ancestor-level indices as bridges between otherwise isolated trie regions. To support insertions, it adopts a threshold-based maintenance scheme that rebuilds shared indices only when necessary, yielding low amortized update cost.
Extensive experiments with real data show that DYLAN consistently improves query throughput at comparable recall, by up to two orders of magnitude on challenging label-rich datasets, while retaining competitive memory, construction, and update costs.2026-11-09T15:10:53ZAccepted at SIGMOD 2027Mengxu JiangZhi YangFangyuan ZhangYin YangSibo Wang