https://arxiv.org/api/CW6oalbBvbMFdY0WnqOWyOiqqA8 2026-06-21T14:59:32Z 28997 675 15 http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.20505v1 2026-05-19T21:22:35Z

Digital lifestyle coaching systems must personalize peer support as user behavior and engagement evolve while preventing personally identifiable information (PII) and sensitive health information from leaking into analytics and AI pipelines. This creates a practical tension: personalization requires longitudinal linkability, while privacy engineering requires minimization, separation, and controlled re-identification. We present PRISM-Coach, a stakeholder-centered architecture and adaptive peer-group assignment method for privacy-preserving lifestyle coaching. PRISM-Coach separates each user into four bounded views: Identity, Operational, Learning, and Coaching, each with distinct access controls and risk profiles. Building on this separation, the system uses vault-based controlled identity restoration, a privacy-constrained contextual bandit to assign users to eligible peer groups under coach-capacity and stability constraints, and a human-in-the-loop coaching assistant that generates de-identified summaries and draft messages without sending raw PII or PHI to external AI services. We instantiate PRISM-Coach in a commercially deployed lifestyle coaching platform and evaluate it using three years of telemetry from approximately 2,800 users and an in-app needs assessment survey. At the population level, daily check-in adherence increases from 0.35 to 0.68, and engagement rises to 1.35 baseline. In a matched 19-week comparison window, the AI-enabled workflow achieves adherence of 0.74 versus 0.48 under static grouping and higher average weight loss: 5.2 kg versus 3.1 kg. Survey results show that 82% report positive perceived benefit, and 92% report increased privacy confidence after transparency disclosures. These results position PRISM-Coach as a practical blueprint for privacy-by-design adaptive learning systems in everyday wellness.

2026-05-19T21:22:35Z Nariman Mani Salma Attaranasl http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.20386v1 2026-05-19T18:35:47Z

The I-Ching is one of the most influential texts in Chinese intellectual history, integrating divination, cosmology, and ethical reflection. While Western experimental music, most notably John Cage, has drawn on the I-Ching as a source of chance operation, such appropriations have often detached its formal mechanisms from the interpretive and philosophical processes that give the text meaning. This work, Music of Changing Lines, presents an interactive system that re-centers the I-Ching as a meaning-bearing framework rather than a neutral randomizer. Users perform Wen Wang Fa coin casting, which is accompanied in real time through probabilistic musical processes. The resulting hexagrams and changing lines are interpreted by a large language model, Gemini, in relation to the user's inquiry. This textual interpretation is then translated into a prompt for a generative music model, Lyria, producing a responsive musical realization. By situating AI as an interpretive intermediary rather than a compositional authority, the system foregrounds the I-Ching's ritual, interpretation, and participation as the primary sonic materials. Music of Changing Lines extends process-driven traditions in computer music by demonstrating how generative AI can support participatory, meaning-driven musical processes without prescribing musical structure or replacing human agency.

2026-05-19T18:35:47Z Published and presented at the International Computer Music Conference (ICMC) 2026 Ling Qi Aleksandra Teng Ma Alexandria Smith http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.03645v2 2026-05-19T17:43:09Z

Emotional coordination is a core property of human interaction that shapes how relational meaning is constructed in real time. While text-based affect inference has become increasingly feasible, prior approaches often treat sentiment as a deterministic point estimate for individual speakers, failing to capture the inherent subjectivity, latent ambiguity, and sequential coupling found in mutual exchanges. We introduce LLM-MC-Affect, a probabilistic framework that characterizes emotion not as a static label, but as a continuous latent probability distribution defined over an affective space. By leveraging stochastic LLM decoding and Monte Carlo estimation, the methodology approximates these distributions to derive high-fidelity sentiment trajectories that explicitly quantify both central affective tendencies and perceptual ambiguity. These trajectories enable a structured analysis of interpersonal coupling through sequential cross-correlation and slope-based indicators, identifying leading or lagging influences between interlocutors. To validate the interpretive capacity of this approach, we utilize teacher-student instructional dialogues as a representative case study, where our quantitative indicators successfully distill high-level interaction insights such as effective scaffolding. This work establishes a scalable and deployable pathway for understanding interpersonal dynamics, offering a generalizable solution that extends beyond education to broader social and behavioral research.

2026-01-07T06:50:41Z Accepted to the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL 2026) Yu-Zheng Lin Bono Po-Jen Shih John Paul Martin Encinas Elizabeth Victoria Abraham Achom Karan Himanshu Patel Jesus Horacio Pacheco Sicong Shao Jyotikrishna Dass Soheil Salehi Pratik Satam http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.12443v1 2026-05-19T16:58:15Z

Social roles shape expectations, priorities, and judgments, yet it remains unclear how large language models (LLMs) associate occupational identities with broader cultural value patterns. Prior work used nationality-based cultural prompting to study how LLM responses to value-survey questions align with human cultural benchmarks. In this paper, we extend that framework by replacing cultural prompting with occupational prompting to examine how professional-role cues influence value-survey responses in open-weight LLMs. Using a survey-grounded evaluation pipeline based on questions from the Integrated Values Surveys, we project model responses into the two-dimensional Inglehart--Welzel cultural space. We prompt open-weight LLMs to answer questions under occupational identities such as accountant, teacher, engineer, and nurse, and then analyze how these occupation-conditioned responses are positioned on the cultural map. Our results show that when open-weight LLMs are prompted with occupations rather than national identities, their responses remain within a broadly Western-leaning region of the cultural map. However, different occupations introduce shifts within this region, producing distinct occupational skews. This indicates that occupational prompts are not treated as neutral role labels, but instead elicit structured value patterns. These findings extend survey-based evaluation of cultural bias beyond nationality-based prompting and provide a framework for studying how occupational personas shape value expression in LLMs.

2026-05-19T16:58:15Z Maksim E. Eren Andrea Brennen Ryan C. Barron Eric Michalak http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.09621v2 2026-05-19T16:53:03Z

The Metaverse utilizes emerging technologies such as Extended Reality (XR), Artificial Intelligence (AI), blockchain, and digital twins to provide an immersive and interactive virtual experience. As the Metaverse continues to evolve, it brings a range of security and privacy threats, such as identity management, data governance, and user interactions. This survey aims to provide a comprehensive review of the enabling technologies for the Metaverse. It also aims to provide a thorough analysis of key vulnerabilities and threats that may compromise its sustainability and user safety. We perform a systematic literature review (SLR) to identify key vulnerabilities and their countermeasures in Metaverse platforms. Metaverse offers a much larger attack surface compared to conventional digital platforms. Immersive, decentralized, and permanent characteristics of the Metaverse generate new vulnerabilities. Although there are many countermeasures to these vulnerabilities, most of them are theoretical or have not been tested in real-world environments. Our review highlights current advancements, identifies research gaps, and outlines future directions to ensure a secure, resilient, and ethically governed Metaverse.

2025-09-18T16:20:46Z Krishno Dey Diogo Barradas Saqib Hakak http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.20081v1 2026-05-19T16:35:00Z

Explainable AI (XAI) is often criticized for failing to satisfy broad desiderata (e.g., fairness, accountability) and for limited practical value to stakeholders. This challenge partly arises because researchers across disciplines prioritize different sets of desiderata that remain underspecified and context-dependent, yet expect XAI to satisfy them simultaneously, resulting in fragmented and sometimes incompatible operationalizations. We argue that many desiderata are not independent, but instead form dependency structures in which higher-level goals (\emph{e.g.}, trust, accountability) rely on more foundational properties (\emph{e.g.}, faithfulness, robustness). Some desiderata are multi-faceted and are best understood within these structures. In particular, instead of addressing all desiderata at once, we focus on subsets of dependency structures and translate them into concrete XAI tasks, thereby decomposing research questions into benchmarkable and solvable units. To this end, we propose a three-axis taxonomy (\emph{target}, \emph{functional role}, and \emph{mode of justification}) and a three-step framework for deriving well-scoped, benchmarkable XAI tasks. Our approach builds on a systematic literature review and conceptual analysis, and supports clarifying desiderata, identifying dependencies, scoping feasibility, and delimiting the design space to derive concrete XAI tasks from abstract desiderata. We illustrate its utility through two explanatory cases, showing how the taxonomy and framework guide systematic task design and evaluation in XAI. {\color{red}{This is a preprint of a paper that will appear in AISoLA 2026.}}

2026-05-19T16:35:00Z 22 pages, 2 figures, 2 tables, AISoLA 2026 AISoLA 2026 Hanwei Zhang Jingwen Wang Holger Hermanns http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.20024v1 2026-05-19T15:48:51Z

This study examines how parents of LGBTQ+ individuals in South Korea navigate the emotional rupture fueled by fear, isolation, and disorientation after learning their children's queer identity, encounter queer-related (mis)information as a way of coping with this emotional toll, and come to listen to queer realities relationally. Through this process, we highlight how parents reconstruct their identities as supportive parents, which reshapes their informating practices, making them more critical in assessing queer-related (mis)information, developing strategies to protect themselves from harmful narratives, and actively challenging misinformation to support others navigating similar experiences. This work contributes to CSCW by (1) foregrounding parents of LGBTQ+ individuals, an underrepresented yet critical stakeholder group in Queer HCI; (2) demonstrating how identity reconfiguration following a trauma-healing process could transform information practices; and (3) arguing that addressing misinformation requires attention beyond individual fact-based discerning to account for its relational, cultural, and emotional dimensions. Further, we invite CSCW scholars to reconsider the balance between abstracting and humanizing information, explore future design possibilities for parents of LGBTQ+ children, and reflect on the role of researchers as participants in collective research communities fueled by care.

2026-05-19T15:48:51Z Soonho Kwon Dong Whi Yoo Koustuv Saha Shaowen Bardzell Younah Kang 10.1145/3816958 http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.03869v4 2026-05-19T14:48:48Z

We present CaravelMetrics, a computational framework for automated cerebrovascular analysis that models vessel morphology through skeletonization-derived graph representations. The framework integrates atlas-based regional parcellation, centerline extraction, and graph construction to compute fifteen morphometric, topological, fractal, and geometric features. The features can be estimated globally from the complete vascular network or regionally within arterial territories, enabling multiscale characterization of cerebrovascular organization. Applied to 570 3D TOF-MRA scans from the IXI dataset (ages 20-86), CaravelMetrics yields reproducible vessel graphs capturing age- and sex-related variations and education-associated increases in vascular complexity, consistent with findings reported in the literature. The framework provides a scalable and fully automated approach for quantitative cerebrovascular feature extraction, supporting normative modeling and population-level studies of vascular health and aging.

2025-12-03T15:21:51Z Accepted at IEEE ISBI 2026 Daniele Falcetta Liane S. Canas Lorenzo Suppa Matteo Pentassuglia Jon Cleary Marc Modat Sébastien Ourselin Maria A. Zuluaga http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.14778v3 2026-05-19T13:25:42Z

Hallucinations -- plausible but factually incorrect responses -- pose a major challenge to the reliability of Large Language Models (LLMs), especially in multi-step or agentic settings. Existing work largely frames hallucinations as a consequence of missing knowledge; we show instead that, even when the relevant factual knowledge is present, models still produce hallucinated answers, pointing to retrieval instability rather than knowledge gaps. Building on this observation, we introduce APORIA (Aggregate Prompt-wise Observation Retrieving Instability via Asymmetry -- the state of puzzlement-in-contradiction that hallucinations embody), a geometric framework that studies repeated responses to the same prompt in sentence-embedding space. Our central hypothesis is that genuine responses cluster more tightly than hallucinated ones; we empirically validate this and show that, after Fisher projection, the two response classes become consistently separable. We leverage this asymmetry in geometry via APORIA-LP, an efficient label-propagation method that classifies large collections of responses from as few as 30--50 annotations, achieving F1 scores above 90% across ten small-sized LLMs. To support further research, we release SOCRATES-300K, a fully labelled dataset of 300,000 responses, together with the code for both dataset generation and result reproduction. Our key finding -- framing hallucinations from a geometric perspective in the embedding space -- complements traditional knowledge-centric and single-response evaluation paradigms, paving the way for further research.

2026-02-16T14:29:55Z 30 pages, 12 figures, 14 tables, accepted as regular paper at ICML'26 Emanuele Ricco Elia Onofri Lorenzo Cima Stefano Cresci Roberto Di Pietro http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.04776v3 2026-05-19T11:11:39Z

Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) represents a rapidly expanding digital infrastructure whose energy demand and associated CO2 emissions are emerging as a new category of climate risk. This study introduces G-TRACE (GenAI Transformative Carbon Estimator), a cross-modal, region-aware framework that quantifies training- and inference-related emissions across modalities and deployment geographies. Using real-world analytics and microscopic simulation, G-TRACE measures energy use and carbon intensity per output type (text, image, video) and reveals how decentralized inference amplifies small per-query energy costs into system-level impacts. Through the Ghibli-style image generation trend (2024-2025), we estimate 4,309 MWh of energy consumption and 2,068 tCO2 emissions, illustrating how viral participation inflates individual digital actions into tonne-scale consequences. Building on these findings, we propose the AI Sustainability Pyramid, a seven-level governance model linking carbon accounting metrics (L1-L7) with operational readiness, optimization, and stewardship. This framework translates quantitative emission metrics into actionable policy guidance for sustainable AI deployment. The study contributes to the quantitative assessment of emerging digital infrastructures as a novel category of climate risk, supporting adaptive governance for sustainable technology deployment. By situating GenAI within climate-risk frameworks, the work advances data-driven methods for aligning technological innovation with global decarbonization and resilience objectives.

2025-11-06T19:52:02Z 27 page, 4 figures Zahida Kausar Seemab Latif Raja Khurram Shahzad Mehwish Fatima http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.12442v1 2026-05-19T10:50:36Z

At present, loss of control risks have gained much prominence in public discussion, particularly in relation to AI, with extensive discourse present among academics, frontier labs, and even governments. However, in the existing literature, the concept seems to rest on surprisingly weak foundations, where even those that discuss loss of control extensively do not first establish what control is and what exactly is being lost. Our paper aims to address these gaps. We establish a working definition of control by anchoring it to the "setting and getting of goals". Then, we discuss various aspects of control, built on foundational concepts from related fields like cybernetics, management control, and control theory. This includes who (or what) can be in control, and the things they require to be in control, such as the ability to set goals, having a functional control loop, having requisite variety, and having sufficient goal alignment. Once a framework for control is established, we then discuss how control can be lost, how AIs can contribute to such loss of control, and offer relevant recommendations for how one can maintain control. One interesting consequence of our work is that humanity, as individuals and as groups, can lose varying degrees of control as a result of AI behaviour that is far below the level of superintelligence; the potential for loss of control scenarios (as we define them) already exist, and have existed for a long time.

2026-05-19T10:50:36Z 56 pages Ze Shen Chin Maurice Chiodo Dennis Müller Coleman Snell http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.23183v2 2026-05-19T10:36:43Z

AI incident reporting requirements are emerging in regulation and policy, yet no operational criteria exist for determining when a detected AI incident warrants escalation beyond national handling to international coordination. This paper proposes an escalation framework to address this gap, intended as a common reference point across jurisdictions that enables aligned escalation while preserving flexibility in how actors respond within their own legal and policy contexts. We review SB 53, the EU AI Act, the GPAI Code of Practice, and incident frameworks from other industries to derive eight criteria for assessing whether an incident warrants escalation, translated into a sequential flowchart with gated decision points and threshold checks. For each criterion, we map how it interplays with these regulatory frameworks, identifying where their design choices support or undermine effective detection. We test the framework against ten documented AI incidents and structured variants to identify where criteria under-detect or misclassify incidents in practice. We find three design patterns that may lead to systematic under-detection in regimes where model developers are responsible for escalation: a. where escalation requires confirmed harm, events such as model weight exfiltration risk detection only after severe, irreversible harm has propagated; b. where incidents are assessed individually, systemic harms emerging from accumulation risk being under-detected; and c. where thresholds align with legal instruments rather than quantitatively testable terms, criteria risk being impractical to apply under time pressure. We also find that escalation rules are only one component of a broader framework: the underlying definitions against which thresholds are set, and the data available to the responsible actor, create interdependencies that can themselves drive under-detection.

2026-04-25T07:31:58Z Version accepted to ICML TAIGR workshop Francesca Gomez Matthew Ball Michael Harre Lydia Preston Josephine Schwab Caio Machado http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.19638v1 2026-05-19T10:23:48Z

As large language models (LLMs) demonstrate increasing competence in synthesizing functional user interfaces, a fundamental question emerges in accessibility computing: \textit{how far can AI-driven accessibility systems go?} This paper introduces the \textit{Accessibility Capability Boundary} (ACB), a formal framework for reasoning about the operational limits and expansion potential of autonomous accessibility systems, and grounds this theory in a real-world systems artifact. We model accessibility not as a binary compliance property but as a dynamic, multidimensional capability space constrained by measurable variables including deployment latency, cognitive load, infrastructure dependency, offline persistence, interaction complexity, and adaptability. We argue that AI-generated, browser-native systems constructed as single-file HTML artifacts leveraging standard browser APIs may dramatically shift the ACB outward by reducing deployment friction to near-zero and enabling rapid, context-specific interface adaptation. We ground our theoretical framework in the analysis of two real-world exploratory prototypes. The first is an AI-generated browser-native accessibility interface deployed for a blind user in Nepal. The second is a fully functional, open-source webcam alignment assistant for visually impaired users, serving as a concrete systems artifact. Through formal definitions, propositions, and a comparative evaluation matrix, we characterize the regions of the accessibility capability space that such systems can and cannot reach. We further identify remaining computational, infrastructural, and verification constraints that constitute the hard boundaries of this paradigm. This work contributes a theoretical foundation for understanding the scalable limits of autonomous accessibility computing and proposes a research agenda for future work in accessibility-aware AI systems.

2026-05-19T10:23:48Z 21 pages, 4 figures Rizwan Jahangir Daisuke Ishii http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.27419v1 2026-05-19T08:45:41Z

LLM-agent simulation offers a flexible computational tool for studying population response trajectories that depend on scenario events, memory, demographics, and evolving social context. However, full multi-round simulation scales linearly with both population size and horizon, requiring every agent to query the LLM at every round. We propose Adaptive Prototype Simulation (APS), a framework that reframes scalable LLM-based simulation as a recurrent oracle-allocation problem. APS retains the designated LLM as the online transition oracle while querying adaptive core prototypes, selected singleton-tail agents, and shadow-audit agents. Prototype responses induce local response surfaces for nearby agents, reducing online LLM calls without replacing the underlying transition model. To control approximation bias, shadow-audit residual correction estimates propagation residuals for aggregate correction and future budget allocation, while tail-protected singleton routing directly queries selected isolated, heterogeneous, or high-curvature regions that are vulnerable to smoothing. Theoretically, we treat APS as an estimator for full-scale high-precision individual social simulation and decompose its errors into prototype-coverage error, shadow-audit residual-correction error, local-propagation bias, and temporal context mismatch. Under the reported protocols, APS gives lower reference-aligned distributional discrepancy than scale-oriented and same-budget baselines while reducing online LLM calls, with ablations and compact robustness checks diagnosing the main bias-control mechanisms. In a 10M-agent, multi-round public-opinion simulation, APS achieves a 381.1-fold reduction over full simulation, with reference-aligned final-round JSD of 0.094 against the corresponding full-LLM reference.

2026-05-19T08:45:41Z 32 pages, 5 figures Quan Zheng Yan Gao Shaobin He Haoxiang Guan Yuanhe Tian Jie Feng Ming Wang Shuxin Zheng Zhen Liu http://arxiv.org/abs/2504.03758v4 2026-05-19T08:34:59Z

Crowd movement simulation is crucial for pedestrian safety management and facility design. Data-driven models offer the potential to improve realism and predictive accuracy, but most are developed for a single scenario, limiting their flexibility. We propose a data-driven crowd simulation model that incorporates refined visual-information extraction and explicit exit cues, aiming to improve flexibility across multiple scenarios by more effectively capturing core navigational features. The model is tested on four fundamental modules (bottleneck, corridor, corner, and T-junction) and further evaluated in a composite scenario using a modular approach. Results show that our model performs well across these scenarios, aligning with pedestrian movement in real-world experiments, and outperforms the classical knowledge-driven model in these scenarios. The research outcomes can provide inspiration for the development of data-driven crowd simulation models and advance the application of data-driven approaches.

2025-04-02T07:53:33Z Xuanwen Liang, Jiayu Chen, Eric Wai Ming Lee, & Wei Xie (2026). Improved visual-information-driven model for crowd simulation and its modular application. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 209, 118481 Xuanwen Liang Jiayu Chen Eric Wai Ming Lee Wei Xie 10.1016/j.chaos.2026.118481