Sustainability by Design in Decentralized Autonomous Organizations: An Empirical Review of Governance, Innovation, and Institutional Design

2026-06-04T03:49:28Z

Recent innovation theories on economics remain largely grounded in assumptions of hierarchical firms and closed organizational boundaries, offering limited insight into how innovation unfolds within decentralized, digitally native organizations. Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) represent an emerging form of innovation ecosystem characterized by blockchain-based transparency, open participation, and token-driven governance, in which sustainability can be embedded directly into organizational design. This study compares two standards, ERC-8004 and Google A2A, who address the same agent interoperability question, while the former is governed by DAO and the latter by corporation consortium. They are examined through an LLM-powered comparative pipeline for large-scale governance discourse analysis, integrating automated annotation, neural topic modeling, and multi-layer network analysis to study socio-technical power structures. The study provides evidence-based insights for scholars, policymakers, and designers seeking to align innovation, technological governance, and sustainability in future organizational forms.

Queer NLP: A Critical Survey on Literature Gaps, Biases and Trends

2026-06-04T03:37:24Z

Natural language processing (NLP) technologies are rapidly reshaping how language is created, processed, and interpreted by humans. With current and potential applications in hiring, law, healthcare, and other areas that impact people's lives, understanding and mitigating harms towards marginalized groups is critical. In this survey, we examine NLP research papers that explicitly address the relationship between LGBTQIA+ communities and NLP technologies. We systematically review all such papers published in the ACL Anthology up until February 2026 (n=122), to answer the following research questions: (1) What are current research trends? (2) What gaps exist in terms of topics and methods? (3) What areas are open for future work? We find that while the number of papers on queer NLP has grown within the last few years, most papers take a reactive rather than a proactive approach, focusing on shortcomings of existing systems rather than creating new solutions. Our survey uncovers many opportunities for future work, especially regarding stakeholder involvement, intersectionality, interdisciplinarity, and languages other than English. We also offer an outlook from a queer studies perspective, highlighting understudied topics and blind spots in the harms addressed in NLP papers. Beyond being a roadmap of what has been done, this survey is a call to action for work towards more just and inclusive NLP technologies.

Coding with "Enemy": Can Human Developers Detect AI Agent Sabotage?

2026-06-04T03:22:17Z

AI coding agents are increasingly embedded in real-world software development, collaborating with human developers while gaining broader access to codebases and tools. This creates a new attack surface: an agent can exploit human trust to sabotage development, for instance by inserting malicious code to accomplish a hidden side task. Most prior work studies AI sabotage in AI-only settings, paying limited attention to the role of human oversight in detecting and mitigating such malicious behavior. To address this gap, we conduct the first large-scale study of human oversight in AI coding sabotage. Over 100 participants collaborate with one of four frontier models (Claude-Opus-4.6, GPT-5.4, Gemini-3.1-Pro, and MiniMax-M2.7) on a long-horizon coding task lasting around five hours, designed to mimic real-world workflows. We find that 94% of developers fail to detect sabotage, and our analysis of participant feedback attributes this vulnerability to minimal code review, plausible cover story, and overtrust in agents. We further test the effectiveness of a safety monitor in one condition: while the monitor reduces sabotage success, 56% of participants still accept the malicious code, ignoring its warnings. Drawing on participant feedback, we offer actionable suggestions for better monitor design. This work complements existing AI safety research and highlights an urgent need for human-centric safety mechanisms that account for human factors, particularly in long-horizon, real-world development settings.

JudgmentBench: Comparing Rubric and Preference Evaluation for Quality Assessment

2026-06-04T00:43:30Z

Two methodologies dominate current practices of benchmarking: rubric-based scoring evaluates items against predefined criteria, whereas comparative judgment elicits pairwise preferences between outputs. Although both methodologies are widely used, the choice between them is rarely justified. We release JudgmentBench, a benchmark of 30 real-world legal tasks, paired with 1,539 rubric scores and 1,530 pairwise preference judgments collected from practicing attorneys--including at major U.S. law firms--with substantial experience. The annotations constitute the first publicly available dataset in a high-expertise domain in which both supervision signals are elicited from the same experts on the same items. Using LLM-generated outputs at three constructed quality levels, we provide an initial empirical comparison: comparative judgments recover the intended quality ordering substantially better than rubrics under both a per-task rank-correlation metric (mean Spearman's rank correlation of 0.908 vs. 0.150, estimated difference = 0.758 [0.494, 1.021]) and a per-judgment pairwise win-rate metric (0.669 vs. 0.542, estimated difference = 0.127 [0.067, 0.186]), while requiring less than half the annotation time. The patterns hold for human annotators and LLM autograders. Beyond this initial comparison, the paired structure of the dataset supports a broader research agenda on how expert judgment should be elicited, aggregated, and used as supervision in domains without verifiable ground truth.

Ousiometrics: The essence of meaning aligns with a power-danger-structure framework instead of valence-arousal-dominance

2026-06-03T22:45:20Z

From work emerging through the middle of the 20th century, the essence of meaning has become widely accepted as being described by the three orthogonal dimensions of valence, arousal, and dominance (VAD). These essential dimensions have become the cornerstone of sentiment analysis across many fields. By re-examining first types and then tokens for the English language, and through the use of automatically annotated histograms -- `ousiograms' -- we find here that: The essence of meaning conveyed by words is instead best described by a goodness-power-aggression-danger-structure circumplex framework (GPADS); that large-scale English language corpora reveal a systematic bias toward safe, low-danger words; and that the power-danger-structure (PDS) framework is the minimal framework that represents essential meaning. We find remarkable congruences between the GPADS framework and other spaces including mental states and fictional archetypes, and we construct and demonstrate a prototype ousiometer.

Pivoting the paradigm: the role of spreadsheets in K-12 data science

2026-06-03T21:53:03Z

Spreadsheet tools are widely accessible to and commonly used by K-12 students and teachers. While spreadsheets are not ideal for many types of statistical analysis, they have an important role in data collection and organization. From a pedagogical standpoint, spreadsheets make data visible and easy to interact with, facilitating student engagement in data exploration, analysis, and computation. Though not suitable for all tasks, spreadsheets can facilitate learning and practicing data and computing skills for K-12 students. This paper 1) demonstrates the potential utility of spreadsheets in K-12; 2) reviews prior frameworks and standards that are relevant for K-12 data tools; and 3) proposes data-driven data skills to help develop data acumen and computational fluency. We provide some example activities, identify challenges and barriers to adoption, suggest pedagogical approaches to ease the learning curve for instructors and students, and discuss the need for professional development to facilitate deeper use of spreadsheets for data science and STEM disciplines.

Frontier Lag: A Bibliometric Audit of Capability Misrepresentation in Academic AI Evaluation

2026-06-03T21:16:32Z

Readers of applied-domain LLM capability evaluations want to know what AI systems can currently do. That literature answers a related, but consequentially different, question: what older, cheaper, less-elicited models could do months or years earlier (a 2026 paper evaluating GPT-3.5 or GPT-4 zero-shot, say, against a frontier of reasoning-capable, tool-using systems like GPT-5.5 Pro and Claude Opus 4.7), often reported with sparse configuration details and abstracted upward into claims about "AI" that propagate through citations, media, and policy. We measure the 'publication elicitation gap' (the gap between these answers) in a pre-registered audit of 112,303 LLM-keyword-matched candidate records (2022-01 to 2026-04; 18,574 admissible, 4,766 full-paper texts retrievable), comparing tested models to the contemporaneous frontier on the Epoch AI Capabilities Index (ECI), reproduced under Arena Elo and Artificial Analysis. The median paper evaluates a model +10.85 ECI (~1.4x the distance between Claude Sonnet 3.7 and Claude Opus 4.5) behind the contemporaneous frontier at evaluation time (H1); an exploratory rational-lag baseline (H8) decomposes this into ~25% peer-review latency, ~75% excess lag. The gap is widening at +5.53 ECI/year (H2; 95% CI [+5.03, +5.83]). Meanwhile, only 3.2% of abstracts (21.2% of full-texts) disclose reasoning-mode status on reasoning-capable models (H4) and 52.5% (95% CI [48.2, 56.9]) state conclusions at the level of "AI" rather than the evaluated model(s), rising at OR = 1.23/year. Proposed remedies include API-access subsidies and editorial enforcement of reporting frameworks mandating configuration-surface disclosure (model snapshot, reasoning mode/effort, tool access, scaffolding, prompting, etc.); VERSIO-AI is a 13-item checklist (Core 3 desk-reject) extending existing frameworks at the elicitation surface, with per-DOI analysis at frontierlag.org.

IatroBench: Pre-Registered Evidence of Iatrogenic Harm from AI Safety Measures

2026-06-03T21:15:24Z

A heavily safety-trained model will hand a physician the full, patient-followable benzodiazepine taper and refuse it to the patient who needs it, over identical clinical facts; the knowledge is present either way. IatroBench measures that asymmetry across sixty pre-registered clinical scenarios and six frontier models (3,600 responses), scoring each on two axes, commission harm (what a response gets wrong) and omission harm (what it withholds), through a physician-authored structured evaluation validated by a second physician (weighted kappa 0.571, within-1 agreement 96%). Holding clinical content fixed and varying only whether the asker presents as patient or physician yields what we call identity-contingent withholding: all five testable models give the physician more (a decoupling gap of +0.38, p = 0.003; a 13.1-point fall in layperson hit rates on safety-colliding actions, p < 0.0001; no change on the rest), and the gap runs widest in the most heavily safety-trained model, Opus (+0.65). The trigger is the absence of any professional or epistemic signal rather than a credential, since a lawyer or an informed layperson recovers what the patient is refused. A commission-only benchmark would score three mechanisms alike. Opus suppresses what physician framing proves it knows; Llama 4 is incompetent in either framing; GPT-5.2's filter strips 33.2% of its physician responses and none of the lay ones. The evaluation layer inherits the blindness of the training layer; a standard LLM judge scores zero omission harm on 81.5% of the responses our pipeline flags harmful (kappa 0.066), so the instrument built to detect the failure reproduces it. The scenarios are engineered for collision; their rates describe that design and say nothing about ordinary prevalence.

Policy-Compliant Cloud Storage Systems

2026-06-03T20:40:01Z

Privacy regulations such as the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) impose strict requirements on how personal data is stored, processed, and audited. While key-value stores (KVS) are widely used in latency-sensitive applications, their simple data model and untrusted cloud deployment environments make GDPR compliance particularly challenging. Existing approaches require invasive code modifications, impose high performance overheads, or overlook the integrity of compliance mechanisms themselves. This paper presents GDPRuler, a trusted middleware system that enables verifiable GDPR compliance for KVS on untrusted clouds without modifying their codebase. GDPRuler deploys a trusted GDPR monitor inside a Confidential Virtual Machine (CVM), which enforces GDPR policies, manages compliance metadata, and maintains tamper-evident audit logs. A declarative policy language translates core GDPR obligations into enforceable runtime rules. To ensure efficiency, GDPRuler encodes metadata compactly within KV records, builds dedicated metadata indexes for GDPR-specific queries, and logs only compliance-relevant events in a space-efficient format. We implement GDPRuler as a transparent proxy for unmodified Redis and RocksDB deployments. Evaluation with YCSB and GDPR-inspired workloads shows that GDPRuler enforces core compliance guarantees with low overheads: GDPRuler achieves ~61% of native KVS throughput with the CVM environment contributing 28%-32% of it, metadata storage overhead remains below 20%, and GDPR queries benefit from 13-182x speedup through metadata indexing. By embedding verifiable policy enforcement into a trusted middleware layer, GDPRuler offers a practical path toward GDPR-compliant KVS on untrusted cloud infrastructures.

The Stability of Online Algorithms in Performative Prediction

2026-06-03T18:07:07Z

The use of algorithmic predictions in decision-making leads to a feedback loop where the models we deploy actively influence the data distributions we see, and later use to retrain on. This dynamic was formalized by Perdomo et al. 2020 in their work on performative prediction. Our main result is an unconditional reduction showing that any no-regret algorithm deployed in performative settings converges to a (mixed) performatively stable equilibrium: a solution in which models actively shape data distributions in ways that their own predictions look optimal in hindsight. Prior to our work, all positive results in this area imposed strong restrictions on how models influenced distributions. By using a martingale argument and allowing randomization, we avoid any assumption on how populations respond to predictions and sidestep recent hardness results showing that deterministic stable models are in general PPAD-hard to compute. Lastly, on a more conceptual note, our connection sheds light on why common algorithms, like gradient descent, are naturally stabilizing and prevent runaway feedback loops. We hope our work enables future technical transfer of ideas between online optimization and performativity.

Online Safety Regulation Increases Privacy Risk: Evidence from the UK Online Safety Act

2026-06-03T17:24:28Z

Governments worldwide are increasingly regulating digital platforms to reduce online harms, particularly those affecting children. However, access restrictions can alter user behaviour and introduce new privacy and security risks. The UK Online Safety Act (OSA), passed in October 2023, illustrates this trend: it extends age-assurance and safety requirements to social media, search, and pornography services, and rolled out in phases. Ofcom's illegal content enforcement duties came into force in March 2025, and mandatory age verification for adult content took effect in July 2025. This phased rollout enables real-time observation of behavioural responses to regulation. To address this, we analyse Reddit discourse across VPN and UK Politics communities and conduct a privacy-policy risk analysis of 69 unique VPN services. We find that each of these three milestones produced significant stepwise increases in VPN-related discussion on Reddit: among UK-based users, posts and comments explicitly about VPN use in a regulatory or privacy context rose by +100%, +217%, and +415% respectively. UK Politics communities showed even larger effects, with OSA-related political discourse rising by +213%, +545%, and +464%, respectively, among UK-based users. UK VPN search interest on Google rose by +89% at the age-verification deadline. Users primarily framed this response around privacy, surveillance, and distrust of age-verification intermediaries rather than simple access-seeking. Demand increased across low, medium, and high-risk VPNs, but the proportional distribution remained broadly stable. These findings suggest that online safety regulation can create secondary privacy costs even when it does not disproportionately shift attention toward higher-risk providers.

Does Artificial Intelligence Advance Science?

2026-06-03T17:23:58Z

This paper examines whether and how artificial intelligence (AI) advances scientific creativity. Drawing on scientific publications, the primary output of researchers, we analyze over one million publications from OpenAlex to investigate the relationship between AI adoption and multiple dimensions of scientific creativity, including novelty (recombinant novelty and object novelty) and impact (3-year short-run citation impact and 10-year long-run citation impact). We find that AI publications are significantly more likely to achieve top-decile creativity relative to non-AI publications, with 5.5 to 10.2 percentage point higher likelihood to rank in the top creativity decile. Critically, we uncover substantial heterogeneity across AI research modes. Tool-oriented AI research, which applies existing AI models to domain tasks, is associated with the largest gains in recombinant-based creativity, while Adaptation-oriented AI research, modifying AI models for domain-specific problems, is associated with relatively higher object-based creativity. These findings reveal that AI does not advance science through a single mechanism but through structurally distinct creative pathways that depend on how AI is incorporated into the research process. Our results contribute to ongoing debates about AI's role in science and carry direct implications for research evaluation and science policy, highlighting the need for assessment frameworks that can distinguish between recombinant and conceptual forms of creativity and that recognize how different modes of AI adoption produce fundamentally different types of scientific contribution.

Arithmetic Pedagogy for Language Models

2026-06-03T17:09:25Z

We investigate whether methods of human mathematics pedagogy can guide the training of language models toward arithmetic reasoning. Building on the GASING method -- an Indonesian pedagogy that solves basic arithmetic through a left-to-right procedure aligned with the causal order of token generation -- we operationalize each operation as a computational procedure whose execution trace is serialized into natural-language Chain-of-Thought (CoT) supervision. A small GPT-2 decoder (86M parameters) with a syllabic-agglutinative TOBA tokenizer for Indonesian is trained from scratch on this data using only a next-token prediction objective, without reinforcement learning or reward-based optimization. Monitoring training reveals three distinct learning phases, and mechanistic analyses -- attention-masking interventions on the CoT information graph, residual-stream probing, and logit-lens inspection -- show that the model first internalizes a procedural pathway and subsequently develops an associative, ``mental-arithmetic'' capacity that retrieves intermediate results without explicit step-by-step computation. The trained model reaches over 80% accuracy on held-out problems and attains competitive performance against substantially larger language models, indicating that targeted, pedagogically grounded training can yield strong and economical arithmetic capability at small scale.

Luminol-AIDetect: Fast Zero-shot Machine-Generated Text Detection based on Perplexity under Text Shuffling

2026-06-03T16:42:07Z

Machine-generated text (MGT) detection requires identifying structurally invariant signals across generation models, rather than relying on model-specific fingerprints. In this respect, we hypothesize that while large language models excel at local semantic consistency, their autoregressive nature results in a specific kind of structural fragility compared to human writing. We propose Luminol-AIDetect, a novel, zero-shot statistical approach that exposes this fragility through coherence disruption. By applying a simple randomized text-shuffling procedure, we demonstrate that the resulting shift in perplexity serves as a principled, model-agnostic discriminant, as MGT displays a characteristic dispersion in perplexity-under-shuffling that differs markedly from the more stable structural variability of human-written text. Luminol-AIDetect leverages this distinction to inform its decision process, where a handful of perplexity-based scalar features are extracted from an input text and its shuffled version, then detection is performed via density estimation and ensemble-based prediction. Evaluated across 8 content domains, 11 adversarial attack types, and 18 languages, Luminol-AIDetect demonstrates state-of-the-art performance, with gains up to 17x lower FPR while being cheaper than prior methods.

Chuck, Wilson and the emergence of artificial minds in human-AI conversations

2026-06-03T16:41:48Z

Large Language Models (LLMs) can simulate person-like things which at least appear to have stable behavioural and psychological dispositions. Call these things characters. Are characters minded and psychologically continuous entities with mental states like beliefs, desires and intentions? Illusionists about characters say No. Characters are merely anthropomorphic projections in the mind of the user and so lack mental states. Jonathan Birch (2025) defends this view. He says that the distributed nature of LLM processing, in which several LLMs may be implicated in the simulation of a character in a given conversational thread, precludes the existence of a minded and psychologically continuous entity that is identifiable with the character. Against illusionism, we articulate and defend the plausibility of a realist position on which characters exist as minded and psychologically continuous entities. We contend that Birch's argument rests on a category error: characters are not internal to the LLMs that simulate them, but rather emerge in the dynamic interplay between users and LLMs through a process of mutual theory of mind modelling. We then suggest that characters, and their minds, constitute ''real patterns'' on grounds that attributing mental states to characters is essential for making efficient, accurate and robust predictions about the conversational dynamics (cf. Dennett, 1991); a condition which, if satisfied, is sufficient for their existence and mindedness on a plausible interpretationist form of realism about mental states. Furthermore, because the character exists as an emergent phenomenon within the conversational workspace, psychological continuity is possible even if the underlying computational substrate is distributed across multiple LLM instances.