https://arxiv.org/api/JNv/wt8TG/TSeW5aDT6gKyK1MhU 2026-06-13T19:36:18Z 28886 135 15 http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.07279v1 2026-06-05T13:55:54Z

This paper presents a detective scaffolding framework -- a three-phase instructional sequence (Hypothesis Activation -> Evidence Structuring -> Causal Integration) in which engineering students investigate a realistic industrial defect scenario using staged in-class polls as designed evidence probes. Unlike conventional uses of student response systems for engagement, the framework positions each poll as an Evidence-Centred Design instrument targeting a specific reasoning capability. In the primary implementation, 80 Year~3 polymer engineering students progressed from prior-knowledge-driven misconception (71% attributing defects to temperature) to complete root-cause convergence (100\% identifying humidity; Fisher's exact test, $p < .001$) across four sequenced prompts within a single 90-minute lecture slot. A dual-accuracy analysis revealed that at one intermediate stage, textbook-correct and analytically valid responses diverged, illustrating why conventional scoring can misrepresent reasoning quality. In a transferability study, 26 Year~12 students with no engineering background achieved identical root-cause identification rates across two adapted scenarios, with significant gains in data-analysis confidence and AI explanation ability. The results suggest that the pedagogical structure, rather than disciplinary content, drives the convergence effect, implying portability across disciplines and educational levels.

2026-06-05T13:55:54Z 24 pages, 3 figures Haolin Feng Holly Barrett Xinru Deng Dimitrios G Papageorgiou Yiwei Sun http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.07270v1 2026-06-05T13:44:35Z

Contribution: This paper presents a novel two-phase algorithmic approach that decouples preference satisfaction from fairness optimization in student team formation, achieving both objectives without compromise. The method applies simulated annealing -- a core materials science technique -- to an educational challenge, demonstrating pedagogical integration of administrative processes. Background: Forming effective teams in large engineering cohorts (100+ students) requires balancing student preferences, academic fairness, and demographic diversity. Existing tools either optimize for fairness while ignoring preferences (CATME, Team-Anneal) or accommodate preferences while compromising balance (self-selection), leaving complaint rates at 5--35%. Intended Outcomes: Eliminate formal complaints, achieve near-zero GPA variance between teams, prevent gender isolation, and maintain high preference satisfaction while creating a scalable, reproducible solution applicable across engineering programs. Application Design: Phase 1 forms fixed triads through graph-theoretic clustering that maximizes mutual preferences, preserving social bonds. Phase 2 employs simulated annealing to pair triads into teams of six while optimizing GPA variance, gender balance, and size constraints. This decomposition mirrors hierarchical optimization in materials processing. Findings: Deployed across 238 students, the algorithm eliminated formal complaints entirely (vs >30% baseline), achieved GPA variance of 0.005 (vs. historical mean 9.74), eliminated gender-isolated individuals, and maintained 94.3% preference satisfaction. Validation against 82 historical grouping instances (1,538 teams, 6 academic years) confirmed significant improvement over conventional methods.

2026-06-05T13:44:35Z 9 pages, 3 figures Yiwei Sun Xinru Deng Dimitrios G Papageorgiou http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.06080v4 2026-06-05T13:26:09Z

This paper presents AIDEN, an artificial intelligence-based assistant designed to enhance the autonomy and daily quality of life of visually impaired individuals, who often struggle with object identification, text reading, and navigation in unfamiliar environments. Existing solutions such as screen readers or audio-based assistants facilitate access to information but frequently lead to auditory overload and raise privacy concerns in open environments. AIDEN addresses these limitations with a hybrid architecture that integrates You Only Look Once (YOLO) for real-time object detection and a Large Language and Vision Assistant (LLaVA) for scene description and Optical Character Recognition (OCR). A key novelty of the system is a continuous haptic guidance mechanism based on a Geiger-counter metaphor, which supports object centering without occupying the auditory channel, while privacy is preserved by ensuring that no personal data are stored. Empirical evaluations with visually impaired participants assessed perceived ease of use and acceptance using the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Results indicate high user satisfaction, particularly regarding intuitiveness and perceived autonomy. Moreover, the ``Find an Object'' achieved effective real-time performance. These findings provide promising evidence that multimodal haptic-visual feedback can improve daily usability and independence compared to traditional audio-centric methods, motivating larger-scale clinical validations.

2025-11-08T17:23:51Z Luis Marquez-Carpintero Francisco Gomez-Donoso Zuria Bauer Bessie Dominguez-Dager Alvaro Belmonte-Baeza Mónica Pina-Navarro Francisco Morillas-Espejo Felix Escalona Miguel Cazorla http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.07245v1 2026-06-05T13:11:39Z

AI sovereignty is the extent to which a nation independently controls its artificial intelligence (AI) technologies. The race toward ever-more-sophisticated frontier AI models is of increasing strategic importance, with nations considering how AI might improve their economic situations, competitive advantage, and overall national power. However, the costs of AI sovereignty are enormous, and we lack definitions and conceptual models to navigate evolving AI sovereignty dynamics. We address this gap with definitions relevant to AI sovereignty, along with a first-of-its-kind qualitative model that incorporates micro, meso, and macro contributors. Model-based qualitative forecasts highlight competitive dynamics and evolving potential for AI-driven national power. The model identifies key leverage points that nations can use to enhance their own growth or degrade an adversary's, including consideration of accelerators, electricity, water, data sets and skilled workforce. These leverage points can be activated at strategic and operational levels through both direct kinetic actions, such as Iran's targeting of data centers with drones, and indirect non-kinetic effects including cyber, space, information, economic coercion and diplomacy. If our assumptions and hypotheses are valid, this strategic competition may come to define how nations improve their economic situations, competitive advantage, and overall national power in the 21st Century.

2026-06-05T13:11:39Z Main article: 19 pages, 10 figures. Supplementary: 19 pages, 7 figures, 7 tables. To be presented at the 2026 International System Dynamics Conference (ISDC), July 20-24, TU Delft, Delft, Netherlands Timothy Clancy Asmeret Naugle http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.06126v2 2026-06-05T13:07:45Z

Google Search deploys a "Onebox" feature at the top of the results page when users conduct searches for Child Sexual Abuse Material. This study evaluates the impact of a strategic shift in this feature, comparing a revised intervention, focused on repercussions and therapeutic resources, to a previous iteration that focused on reporting. Using a difference-in-differences analysis of internal Google Search logs data, we found the new messaging resulted in a 3.8 percentage point reduction as compared to the status quo in subsequent CSAM-related queries within the same Search session. We found an average click through rate of 0.73% on any of the hyperlinked buttons to help-providing resources. Together, this research presents convergent evidence that a subset of individuals can be deterred from ongoing CSAM-seeking and redirected to therapeutic services.

2026-06-04T13:13:30Z Rebecca Umbach Griffin Hunt John Buckley Joel Scanlan Caoilte Ó Ciardha Ethel Quayle Ainslie Heasman Maximilian von Heyden Elizabeth Letourneau Donald Findlater Tegan Insoll Richard Wortley Chad Steel Abhishek Roy http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.22041v2 2026-06-05T12:22:34Z

Heralding the advent of autonomous vehicles and mobile robots that interact with humans, responsibility in spatial interaction is burgeoning as a research topic. Even though metrics of responsibility tailored to spatial interactions have been proposed, they are mostly focused on the responsibility of individual agents. Metrics of causal responsibility focusing on individuals fail in cases of causal overdeterminism - when many actors simultaneously cause an outcome. To fill the gaps in causal responsibility left by individual-focused metrics, we formulate a metric for the causal responsibility of groups. To identify assertive agents that are causally responsible for the trajectory of an affected agent, we further formalise the types of assertive influences and propose a tiering algorithm for systematically identifying assertive agents. Finally, we use scenario-based simulations to illustrate the benefits of considering groups and how the emergence of group effects vary with interaction dynamics and the proximity of agents.

2026-02-25T15:48:52Z Presented at COINE workshop collocated with AAMAS 2026 Ashwin George Vassil Guenov Arkady Zgonnikov David A. Abbink Luciano Cavalcante Siebert http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.17739v2 2026-06-05T10:59:58Z

Understanding the causal influence of one agent on another agent is crucial for safely deploying artificially intelligent systems such as automated vehicles and mobile robots into human-inhabited environments. Existing models of causal responsibility deal with simplified abstractions of scenarios with discrete actions, thus, limiting real-world use when understanding responsibility in spatial interactions. Based on the assumption that spatially interacting agents are embedded in a scene and must follow an action at each instant, Feasible Action-Space Reduction (FeAR) was proposed as a metric for causal responsibility in a grid-world setting with discrete actions.Since real-world interactions involve continuous action spaces, this paper proposes a formulation of the FeAR metric for measuring causal responsibility in space-continuous interactions. We illustrate the utility of the metric in prototypical space-sharing conflicts, and showcase its applications for analysing backward-looking responsibility and in estimating forward-looking responsibility to guide agent decision making. Our results highlight the potential of the FeAR metric for designing and engineering artificial agents, as well as for assessing the responsibility of agents around humans.

2025-05-23T11:02:44Z In review Ashwin George Luciano Cavalcante Siebert David A. Abbink Arkady Zgonnikov http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.07069v1 2026-06-05T09:09:03Z

We introduce mmPISA-bench, a compact high-quality multilingual reasoning benchmark derived from the OECD Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA). The benchmark consists of 25 multiple-choice questions that require reasoning in order to be answered correctly. Each question is provided in official human translations to 43 languages and complemented with machine-translated counterparts (i.e., 2,150 data points in total). We evaluate two mainstream proprietary LLMs across languages, reasoning effort levels, and translation types in terms of their ability to answer the questions correctly. Our results show that modern LLMs can reason effectively across all evaluated languages, achieve accuracy comparable to human test-takers, with some performance variations across covered languages. We further find that machine-translated questions do not degrade accuracy relative to official human translations which suggests that high-quality machine translation (synthetic data) might often be adequate for large-scale multilingual reasoning evaluations where official translations are not available. Finally, we analyze token usage and related inference cost and find that LLMs usage in some languages is simultaneously more expensive and less accurate.

2026-06-05T09:09:03Z Yerzhan Sapenov Jaromir Savelka http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.23783v2 2026-06-05T09:06:54Z

Effective community governance hinges on understanding what specific residents think and need. Recent work has used large language models (LLMs) to simulate human respondents, offering a scalable, reproducible way to study human attitudes and behaviors at low cost. However, these studies typically prompt the model with just a few demographic variables (age, gender, income), simulating only general role types. This is insufficient for community governance, where decisions depend on the views of specific residents. We bridge this gap with an integrated research framework covering dataset, benchmark, algorithm, and system. The dataset comprises approximately 1.2 million characters of first-person narrative collected through two-hour semi-structured interviews with each of 92 residents in an urban community, organized around nine community-governance domains. The benchmark probes 18 mainstream LLMs across four prompting strategies and shows that adding rich life-history profiles meaningfully raises fidelity above the no-profile baseline, but this gain comes with more input tokens per call from the longer prompts they require. The algorithm, curriculum-LoRA, is a parameter-efficient personalization framework that, by closing this fidelity-cost gap, matches the strongest baseline's fidelity at roughly 10x lower per-call cost and Pareto-dominates every configuration tested. The system integrates curriculum-LoRA into a closed-loop policy-evaluation pipeline. Together, these results bring individual-level LLM-based resident simulation within reach of resource-constrained local administrations, enabling community-governance decisions to be systematically pre-evaluated in silico before real-world deployment.

2026-05-22T15:48:49Z Xu Chen Yuanzi Li Lei Wang Nan Lu Yang Wang Anding Wang Lei Shi Xiaoxing Fu Ji-Rong Wen http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.04982v3 2026-06-05T08:57:56Z

Can targeted user training unlock the productive potential of generative artificial intelligence in professional settings? We study this question using a randomized experiment in which 164 law students completed an issue-spotting examination under one of three conditions: no GenAI access, optional access to a large language model (LLM), or LLM access with a brief training intervention. Untrained LLM access proved counterproductive: relative to participants without any LLM access, untrained users wrote significantly shorter answers, committed more case misstatements, and scored marginally lower, though most differences fall short of conventional significance. Training reversed this pattern. Trained participants adopted the LLM at higher rates (41% vs. 26%; p = 0.044), scored 0.27 grade points higher than untrained users--roughly one fine grade--(p = 0.027), and stated applicable rules more accurately (p = 0.014). Principal stratification analysis suggests training operates primarily through adoption rather than effectiveness--the adoption lower bound (1.06) exceeds the effectiveness upper bound (0.42) at strict mean dominance--though confidence intervals are wide. More broadly, these findings challenge the view that GenAI primarily benefits lower-skilled workers: without training, higher-ability practitioners opt out while lower-ability users adopt but unproductively. Realizing GenAI's productivity gains requires investment in both access and instruction.

2026-03-05T09:23:30Z Benjamin M. Chen Hong Bao http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.20146v3 2026-06-05T08:27:26Z

The COVID-19 pandemic triggered not only a global health crisis but also an infodemic, where exposure to heterogeneous information sources influenced public emotional responses. In this work, we investigate the determinants of self-reported fear of infection using data from the Delphi US CTIS survey. In particular, we analyze how demographic variables, epidemiological conditions, and exposure to different information sources shape fear levels. We introduce a Probabilistic Causal Model to estimate causal relationship strengths, identifying the variables that most strongly influence fear. Our results indicate that exposure to information sources accounts for a greater proportion of the variance in fear than demographic and epidemiological variables do. We further compute the Average Treatment Effect to quantify the impact of different information sources on fear. After causal adjustment, institutional and expert-driven sources are associated with increased fear levels, whereas politicians, religious leaders, and alternative information channels are associated with reduced fear. These findings highlight both the central role of the information ecosystem in shaping emotional responses during public health crises and the value of causal inference approaches for studying behavioral responses to pandemics.

2025-08-27T11:31:56Z Daniele Baccega Paolo Castagno Antonio Fernández Anta Juan Marcos Ramirez Matteo Sereno http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.06417v2 2026-06-05T07:51:49Z

Warning messages have been used to disrupt individuals seeking online child sexual abuse material (CSAM) and promote engagement with support services, yet large-scale field evidence on message content remains limited, particularly in high anonymity environments. This study reports a field experiment on Ahmia.fi, a Tor search engine, examining how warning message content influences behavior. Across a 140-day period, almost 20 million searches were observed, with over 3 million searches containing known CSAM-related terms that triggered a warning linking to an anonymous self-help program. Users were exposed to warning messages varying in thematic content and framing, or a neutral message. Across a randomized comparison, a campaign-wide analysis, and interrupted time series models, message content consistently influenced engagement with help resources. All active messages increased click-through rates to help resources relative to the neutral condition, with a harm-focused message producing the strongest effects. At the platform level, click-through rates increased from 8.73% before the intervention to 15.67% during the campaign. These findings highlight the importance of message content in shaping responses to warning interventions, supporting an approach in which messaging is refined and adapted to increase engagement with support resources.

2026-06-04T17:21:23Z Caoilte Ó Ciardha Joel Scanlan Tegan Insoll Juha Nurmi Nina Vaaranen-Valkonen http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.07732v2 2026-06-05T05:42:03Z

Third-party developers (TPDs) often turn to online communities for support when they can't get immediate responses from the platform. Twitch, as a leading live streaming platform, attracted many TPDs and formed an online support community on Discord. This study explores TPDs' support practices via mixed method (a topic modeling to identify topics related to support seeking and provision first and a follow-up in-depth qualitative analysis with these topics) and found that: (1) TPDs' support-seeking practices around social, technical, and policy matters are highly dependent on Twitch, and this dependence acts as a form of platform labor; (2) TPDs need to switch between Discord and Twitch regarding seeking and provision, exacerbating TPDs' platform labor; (3) TPDs' flexible role practices reflect the community's flourishing on Discord but require roles to bridge the two platforms and transfer informal support seeking to possible formal support from Twitch. We propose implications for effectively managing support seeking and provision between formal and informal spaces to improve the development of TPDs. We also contribute to community support practice and to platform ecology work in CSCW.

2026-04-09T02:29:15Z Accepted by ACM CSCW 2026 Jie Cai He Zhang Yueyan Liu John M. Carroll Chun Yu 10.1145/3817021 http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.00603v2 2026-06-05T04:30:43Z

LLM agents are increasingly used in moderation-relevant public forum workflows, where their choices to answer, acknowledge, repair, or decline are routinely challenged by users, platforms, and regulators. The same agent often returns different responses on identical content, so any defense based on the agent's behavior cannot be reliably reproduced. The variation is structural. Four deployment choices typically invisible to the operator each shift the agent's response rate, and their combinations can produce substantially different interventions on the same forum posts. The four choices are (1) which model version is currently served, which can change between calls without notice; (2) the model's weight-release status (open-weight, with weights publicly downloadable, vs. closed-weight, with weights held by the provider); (3) which provider serves the request; and (4) which system-prompt policy is in force. Across LLMs spanning both open-weight and closed-weight families, we find that the previously reported tendency to decline more on visible than hidden challenges aligns with the open/closed weight boundary in our panel more than with access surface. Every closed-weight cell declines more on visible challenges; every open-weight cell reverses this or shows no gap. Auditable forum-agent governance requires awareness of all four choices, not just the model name, since each independently shifts behavior.

2026-05-30T08:01:00Z Luyang Zhang Yi-Yun Chu Ramayya Krishnan http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.06895v1 2026-06-05T04:27:34Z

The deployment of embodied artificial intelligence via world-model-based robotics presents a transformative opportunity for blockchain infrastructure, establishing urgent demand for trustworthy data provenance, cross-organizational governance, and incentive-compatible sharing across decentralized ecosystems. Simultaneously, quantum computing advances recognized by the 2025 Nobel Prize in Physics and the Turing Award threaten the cryptographic primitives securing these data economies, creating an interdependent imperative: long-lived verification for embodied AI depends on crypto-agile architectures capable of withstanding quantum adversaries. This tutorial examines blockchain as the coordination layer bridging this dual transition, from financial substrate to foundational Cyber-Physical-Social Systems infrastructure that simultaneously secures against quantum cryptanalysis and enables scalable, trustworthy data economies. The session opens with an immersive AWS Braket demonstration engaging participants with superconducting, trapped-ion, and neutral-atom hardware to assess cryptographic threat timelines and witness ECDSA-to-post-quantum signature transitions. Five integrated modules progress from embodied AI and world-model requirements through quantum hardware reality and evidence-based security migration, to scalable cross-shard architectures via BrokerChain protocols, trustworthy data economies implementing Croissant metadata standards and robotic learning provenance, and industry ecosystem integration for multi-modal cloud deployment. By bridging quantum hardware realities with embodied AI data requirements, this tutorial charts blockchain as unified infrastructure for next-generation decentralized intelligent environments, providing open-source frameworks and roadmaps for architecting quantum-resistant, interoperable, and data-trustworthy systems.

2026-06-05T04:27:34Z Song Guo Huawei Huang Dongping Liu Aoyu Zhang Luyao Zhang