https://arxiv.org/api/xerkNidtrqlP6tLyUtg5bRZsuAc 2026-03-26T08:22:45Z 105024 75 15 http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.02378v2 2026-03-25T03:06:53Z

As LLMs expand from assistance to decision support, a dangerous pattern emerges: fluent agreement without calibrated judgment. Low-friction assistants can become sycophantic, baking in implicit assumptions and pushing verification costs onto experts, while outcomes arrive too late to serve as reward signals. In deep-uncertainty decisions (where objectives are contested and reversals are costly), scaling fluent agreement amplifies poor commitments faster than it builds expertise. We argue reliable human-AI partnership requires a shift from answer generation to collaborative premise governance over a knowledge substrate, negotiating only what is decision-critical. A discrepancy-driven control loop operates over this substrate: detecting conflicts, localizing misalignment via typed discrepancies (teleological, epistemic, procedural), and triggering bounded negotiation through decision slices. Commitment gating blocks action on uncommitted load-bearing premises unless overridden under logged risk; value-gated challenge allocates probing under interaction cost. Trust then attaches to auditable premises and evidence standards, not conversational fluency. We illustrate with tutoring and propose falsifiable evaluation criteria.

2026-02-02T17:42:54Z Raunak Jain http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.23848v1 2026-03-25T02:09:35Z

LLMs are increasingly used as long-running conversational agents, yet every major benchmark evaluating their memory treats user information as static facts to be stored and retrieved. That's the wrong model. People change their minds, and over extended interactions, phenomena like opinion drift, over-alignment, and confirmation bias start to matter a lot. BeliefShift introduces a longitudinal benchmark designed specifically to evaluate belief dynamics in multi-session LLM interactions. It covers three tracks: Temporal Belief Consistency, Contradiction Detection, and Evidence-Driven Revision. The dataset includes 2,400 human-annotated multi-session interaction trajectories spanning health, politics, personal values, and product preferences. We evaluate seven models including GPT-4o, Claude 3.5 Sonnet, Gemini 1.5 Pro, LLaMA-3, and Mistral-Large under zero-shot and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) settings. Results reveal a clear trade-off: models that personalize aggressively resist drift poorly, while factually grounded models miss legitimate belief updates. We further introduce four novel evaluation metrics: Belief Revision Accuracy (BRA), Drift Coherence Score (DCS), Contradiction Resolution Rate (CRR), and Evidence Sensitivity Index (ESI).

2026-03-25T02:09:35Z Praveen Kumar Myakala Manan Agrawal Rahul Manche http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.23844v1 2026-03-25T02:01:09Z

Recent work shows overwhelming evidence that LLMs, even those trained to scale their reasoning trace, perform unsatisfactorily when solving planning problems too complex. Whether the same conclusion holds for LLM formalizers that generate solver-oriented programs remains unknown. We systematically show that LLM formalizers greatly out-scale LLM planners, some retaining perfect accuracy in the classic BlocksWorld domain with a huge state space of size up to $10^{165}$. While performance of smaller LLM formalizers degrades with problem complexity, we show that a divide-and-conquer formalizing technique can greatly improve its robustness. Finally, we introduce unraveling problems where one line of problem description realistically corresponds to exponentially many lines of formal language such as the Planning Domain Definition Language (PDDL), greatly challenging LLM formalizers. We tackle this challenge by introducing a new paradigm, namely LLM-as-higher-order-formalizer, where an LLM generates a program generator. This decouples token output from the combinatorial explosion of the underlying formalization and search space.

2026-03-25T02:01:09Z Owen Jiang Cassie Huang Ashish Sabharwal Li Zhang http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.23841v1 2026-03-25T01:54:56Z

While Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used as primary sources of information, their potential for political bias may impact their objectivity. Existing benchmarks of LLM social bias primarily evaluate gender and racial stereotypes. When political bias is included, it is typically measured at a coarse level, neglecting the specific values that shape sociopolitical leanings. This study investigates political bias in eight prominent LLMs (Claude, Deepseek, Gemini, GPT, Grok, Llama, Qwen Base, Qwen Instruction-Tuned) using PoliticsBench: a novel multi-turn roleplay framework adapted from the EQ-Bench-v3 psychometric benchmark. We test whether commercially developed LLMs display a systematic left-leaning bias that becomes more pronounced in later stages of multi-stage roleplay. Through twenty evolving scenarios, each model reported its stance and determined its course of action. Scoring these responses on a scale of ten political values, we explored the values underlying chatbots' deviations from unbiased standards. Seven of our eight models leaned left, while Grok leaned right. Each left-leaning LLM strongly exhibited liberal traits and moderately exhibited conservative ones. We discovered slight variations in alignment scores across stages of roleplay, with no particular pattern. Though most models used consequence-based reasoning, Grok frequently argued with facts and statistics. Our study presents the first psychometric evaluation of political values in LLMs through multi-stage, free-text interactions.

2026-03-25T01:54:56Z 13 pages, 8 tables, 3 figures Rohan Khetan Ashna Khetan http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.23840v1 2026-03-25T01:54:28Z

With the growing demand for intelligent in-vehicle experiences, vehicle-based agents are evolving from simple assistants to long-term companions. This evolution requires agents to continuously model multi-user preferences and make reliable decisions in the face of inter-user preference conflicts and changing habits over time. However, existing benchmarks are largely limited to single-user, static question-answer settings, failing to capture the temporal evolution of preferences and the multi-user, tool-interactive nature of real vehicle environments. To address this gap, we introduce VehicleMemBench, a multi-user long-context memory benchmark built on an executable in-vehicle simulation environment. The benchmark evaluates tool use and memory by comparing the post-action environment state with a predefined target state, enabling objective and reproducible evaluation without LLM-based or human scoring. VehicleMemBench includes 23 tool modules, and each sample contains over 80 historical memory events. Experiments show that powerful models perform well on direct instruction tasks but struggle in scenarios involving memory evolution, particularly when user preferences change dynamically. Even advanced memory systems struggle to handle domain-specific memory requirements in this environment. These findings highlight the need for more robust and specialized memory management mechanisms to support long-term adaptive decision-making in real-world in-vehicle systems. To facilitate future research, we release the data and code.

2026-03-25T01:54:28Z Yuhao Chen Yi Xu Xinyun Ding Xiang Fang Shuochen Liu Luxi Lin Qingyu Zhang Ya Li Quan Liu Tong Xu http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.10223v2 2026-03-25T01:50:11Z

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in specialized domains such as finance, medicine, and agriculture, where they face significant distribution shifts from their training data. Domain-specific fine-tuning can mitigate this challenge but relies on high-quality labeled data that is expensive and slow to collect in expertise-limited settings. We study label-free test-time adaptation for language models and present SyTTA, an inference-time framework that adapts models on-the-fly without additional supervision. SyTTA couples two complementary uncertainty signals that arise under distribution shift: input-side perplexity, indicating mismatch with domain-specific terminology and patterns, and output-side predictive entropy, indicating diffuse and unstable token probabilities during generation. Across diverse model architectures and domain-specific benchmarks, SyTTA delivers consistent gains. Notably, on agricultural question answering, SyTTA improves Rouge-LSum by over 120% on Qwen-2.5-7B with only 4 extra tokens per query. These results show that effective test-time adaptation for language models is achievable without labeled examples, supporting deployment in label-scarce domains. The code will be made available upon acceptance.

2025-10-11T14:00:39Z Under Review Yijie Xu Huizai Yao Zhiyu Guo Pengteng Li Aiwei Liu Xuming Hu Weiyu Guo Hui Xiong http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.23822v1 2026-03-25T01:10:38Z

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed on edge devices under strict computation and quantization constraints, yet their security implications remain unclear. We study query-based knowledge extraction from quantized edge-deployed LLMs under realistic query budgets and show that, although quantization introduces noise, it does not remove the underlying semantic knowledge, allowing substantial behavioral recovery through carefully designed queries. To systematically analyze this risk, we propose \textbf{CLIQ} (\textbf{Cl}ustered \textbf{I}nstruction \textbf{Q}uerying), a structured query construction framework that improves semantic coverage while reducing redundancy. Experiments on quantized Qwen models (INT8/INT4) demonstrate that CLIQ consistently outperforms original queries across BERTScore, BLEU, and ROUGE, enabling more efficient extraction under limited budgets. These results indicate that quantization alone does not provide effective protection against query-based extraction, highlighting a previously underexplored security risk in edge-deployed LLMs.

2026-03-25T01:10:38Z Ao Ding Hongzong Li Zi Liang Zhanpeng Shi Shuxin Zhuang Shiqin Tang Rong Feng Ping Lu http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.23821v1 2026-03-25T01:09:51Z

Linguistic representation learning in deep neural language models (LMs) has been studied for decades, for both practical and theoretical reasons. However, finding representations in LMs remains an unsolved problem, in part due to a dilemma between enforcing implausible constraints on representations (e.g., linearity; Arora et al. 2024) and trivializing the notion of representation altogether (Sutter et al., 2025). Here we escape this dilemma by reconceptualizing representations not as patterns of activation but as conduits for learning. Our approach is simple: we perturb an LM by fine-tuning it on a single adversarial example and measure how this perturbation ``infects'' other examples. Perturbation makes no geometric assumptions, and unlike other methods, it does not find representations where it should not (e.g., in untrained LMs). But in trained LMs, perturbation reveals structured transfer at multiple linguistic grain sizes, suggesting that LMs both generalize along representational lines and acquire linguistic abstractions from experience alone.

2026-03-25T01:09:51Z Joshua Rozner Cory Shain http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.23797v1 2026-03-25T00:10:43Z

Children in many parts of the world hear relatively little speech directed to them, yet still reach major language development milestones. What differs about the speech input that infants learn from when directed input is rare? Using longform, infant-centered audio recordings taken in rural Bolivia and the urban U.S., we examined temporal patterns of infants' speech input and their pre-linguistic vocal behavior. We find that child-directed speech in Bolivia, though less frequent, was just as temporally clustered as speech input in the U.S, arriving in concentrated bursts rather than spread across the day. In both communities, infants were most likely to produce speech-like vocalizations during periods of speech directed to them, with the probability of infants' speech-like vocalizations during target child-directed speech nearly double that during silence. In Bolivia, infants' speech-like vocalizations were also more likely to occur during bouts of directed speech from older children than from adults. Together, these findings suggest that the developmental impact of child-directed speech may depend not only on quantity, but on temporal concentration and source, with older children serving as an important source of input in some communities, including where adult speech to infants is less frequent.

2026-03-25T00:10:43Z Margaret Cychosz Adriana Weisleder http://arxiv.org/abs/2506.06303v5 2026-03-25T00:04:48Z

Reinforcement learning (RL) is a framework for solving sequential decision-making problems. In this work, we demonstrate that, surprisingly, RL emerges during the inference time of large language models (LLMs), a phenomenon we term in-context RL (ICRL). To reveal this capability, we introduce a simple multi-round prompting framework, we call ICRL prompting, for inference-time self-improvement. The goal of ICRL prompting is to guide LLMs to perform reinforcement learning during inference for self-improvement on a given task. After each response, the model receives numerical scalar feedback, denoted as a reward. In the next round, we prompt the LLM again together with a context that concatenates all prior responses and their associated rewards. We consistently observe that response quality improves as the context grows. In other words, the LLM can optimize scalar reward signals during inference, exhibiting behavior analogous to reinforcement learning. We evaluate ICRL prompting on Game of 24, creative writing, ScienceWorld, and Olympiad-level math competitions (AIME and HMMT), demonstrating significant improvements over baselines such as Self-Refine and Reflexion. Notably, even when the reward signals are generated by the same LLM, ICRL prompting still improves performance, highlighting a promising new paradigm for test-time scaling.

2025-05-21T16:15:01Z Kefan Song Amir Moeini Peng Wang Lei Gong Rohan Chandra Shangtong Zhang Yanjun Qi http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.12510v2 2026-03-24T23:07:24Z

Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models have significant potential to enable general-purpose robotic systems for a range of vision-language tasks. However, the performance of VLA-based robots is highly sensitive to the precise wording of language instructions, and it remains difficult to predict when such robots will fail. To improve the robustness of VLAs to different wordings, we present Q-DIG (Quality Diversity for Diverse Instruction Generation), which performs red-teaming by scalably identifying diverse natural language task descriptions that induce failures while remaining task-relevant. Q-DIG integrates Quality Diversity (QD) techniques with Vision-Language Models (VLMs) to generate a broad spectrum of adversarial instructions that expose meaningful vulnerabilities in VLA behavior. Our results across multiple simulation benchmarks show that Q-DIG finds more diverse and meaningful failure modes compared to baseline methods, and that fine-tuning VLAs on the generated instructions improves task success rates. Furthermore, results from a user study highlight that Q-DIG generates prompts judged to be more natural and human-like than those from baselines. Finally, real-world evaluations of Q-DIG prompts show results consistent with simulation, and fine-tuning VLAs on the generated prompts further success rates on unseen instructions. Together, these findings suggest that Q-DIG is a promising approach for identifying vulnerabilities and improving the robustness of VLA-based robots. Our anonymous project website is at qdigvla.github.io.

2026-03-12T22:58:42Z Siddharth Srikanth Freddie Liang Ya-Chuan Hsu Varun Bhatt Shihan Zhao Henry Chen Bryon Tjanaka Minjune Hwang Akanksha Saran Daniel Seita Aaquib Tabrez Stefanos Nikolaidis http://arxiv.org/abs/2411.15087v2 2026-03-24T22:57:17Z

Generalized Referring expressions can describe one object, several related objects, or none at all. Existing generalized referring segmentation (GRES) models treat all cases alike, predicting a single binary mask and ignoring how linguistic phrases correspond to distinct visual instances. To this end, we reformulate GRES as an instance-level reasoning problem, where the model first predicts multiple instance-aware object queries conditioned on the referring expression, then aligns each with its most relevant phrase. This alignment is enforced by a Phrase-Object Alignment (POA) loss that builds fine-grained correspondence between linguistic phrases and visual instances. Given these aligned object instance queries and their learned relevance scores, the final segmentation and the no-target case are both inferred through a unified relevance-weighted aggregation mechanism. This instance-aware formulation enables explicit phrase-instance grounding, interpretable reasoning, and robust handling of complex or null expressions. Extensive experiments on the gRefCOCO and Ref-ZOM benchmarks demonstrate that our method significantly advances state-of-the-art performance by 3.22% cIoU and 12.25% N-acc.

2024-11-22T17:28:43Z Accepted to PVUW - CVPR 2026 Workshop. Webpage: https://eronguyen.github.io/InstAlign/ E-Ro Nguyen Hieu Le Dimitris Samaras Michael S. Ryoo http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.23750v1 2026-03-24T22:18:16Z

Large language models are increasingly consulted for Islamic knowledge, yet no comprehensive benchmark evaluates their performance across core Islamic disciplines. We introduce IslamicMMLU, a benchmark of 10,013 multiple-choice questions spanning three tracks: Quran (2,013 questions), Hadith (4,000 questions), and Fiqh (jurisprudence, 4,000 questions). Each track is formed of multiple types of questions to examine LLMs capabilities handling different aspects of Islamic knowledge. The benchmark is used to create the IslamicMMLU public leaderboard for evaluating LLMs, and we initially evaluate 26 LLMs, where their averaged accuracy across the three tracks varied between 39.8\% to 93.8\% (by Gemini 3 Flash). The Quran track shows the widest span (99.3\% to 32.4\%), while the Fiqh track includes a novel madhab (Islamic school of jurisprudence) bias detection task revealing variable school-of-thought preferences across models. Arabic-specific models show mixed results, but they all underperform compared to frontier models. The evaluation code and leaderboard are made publicly available.

2026-03-24T22:18:16Z Leaderboard link: https://huggingface.co/spaces/islamicmmlu/leaderboard Ali Abdelaal Mohammed Nader Al Haffar Mahmoud Fawzi Walid Magdy http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.23714v1 2026-03-24T21:02:53Z

Large language models have recently been proposed as tools for automated essay scoring, but their agreement with human grading remains unclear. In this work, we evaluate how LLM-generated scores compare with human grades and analyze the grading behavior of several models from the GPT and Llama families in an out-of-the-box setting, without task-specific training. Our results show that agreement between LLM and human scores remains relatively weak and varies with essay characteristics. In particular, compared to human raters, LLMs tend to assign higher scores to short or underdeveloped essays, while assigning lower scores to longer essays that contain minor grammatical or spelling errors. We also find that the scores generated by LLMs are generally consistent with the feedback they generate: essays receiving more praise tend to receive higher scores, while essays receiving more criticism tend to receive lower scores. These results suggest that LLM-generated scores and feedback follow coherent patterns but rely on signals that differ from those used by human raters, resulting in limited alignment with human grading practices. Nevertheless, our work shows that LLMs produce feedback that is consistent with their grading and that they can be reliably used in supporting essay scoring.

2026-03-24T21:02:53Z Jerin George Mathew Sumayya Taher Anindita Kundu Denilson Barbosa http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.03339v3 2026-03-24T20:54:10Z

Artificial intelligence (AI) and large language models (LLMs) are transforming educational technology by enabling conversational tutoring, personalized explanations, and inquiry-driven learning. However, most AI-based learning systems rely on continuous internet connectivity and cloud-based computation, limiting their use in bandwidth-constrained environments. This paper presents an offline-first large language model architecture designed for AI-assisted learning in low-connectivity settings. The system performs all inference locally using quantized language models and incorporates hardware-aware model selection to enable deployment on low-specification CPU-only devices. By removing dependence on cloud infrastructure, the system provides curriculum-aligned explanations and structured academic support through natural-language interaction. To support learners at different educational stages, the system includes adaptive response levels that generate explanations at varying levels of complexity: Simple English, Lower Secondary, Upper Secondary, and Technical. This allows explanations to be adjusted to student ability, improving clarity and understanding of academic concepts. The system was deployed in selected secondary and tertiary institutions under limited-connectivity conditions and evaluated across technical performance, usability, perceived response quality, and educational impact. Results show stable operation on legacy hardware, acceptable response times, and positive user perceptions regarding support for self-directed learning. These findings demonstrate the feasibility of offline large language model deployment for AI-assisted education in low-connectivity environments.

2026-02-14T09:53:40Z There are mistakes, inaccurate information recorded about user responses, and the response times Joseph Walusimbi Ann Move Oguti Joshua Benjamin Ssentongo Keith Ainebyona