https://arxiv.org/api/81xKc3x0GWYiFklUeKhjEX/mQZo 2026-04-05T13:07:48Z 105533 285 15 http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.19146v2 2026-03-31T12:41:50Z

We introduce VIGiA, a novel multimodal dialogue model designed to understand and reason over complex, multi-step instructional video action plans. Unlike prior work which focuses mainly on text-only guidance, or treats vision and language in isolation, VIGiA supports grounded, plan-aware dialogue that requires reasoning over visual inputs, instructional plans, and interleaved user interactions. To this end, VIGiA incorporates two key capabilities: (1) multimodal plan reasoning, enabling the model to align uni- and multimodal queries with the current task plan and respond accurately; and (2) plan-based retrieval, allowing it to retrieve relevant plan steps in either textual or visual representations. Experiments were done on a novel dataset with rich Instructional Video Dialogues aligned with Cooking and DIY plans. Our evaluation shows that VIGiA outperforms existing state-of-the-art models on all tasks in a conversational plan guidance setting, reaching over 90\% accuracy on plan-aware VQA.

2026-02-22T12:20:28Z Published at EACL 2026 Findings Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EACL 2026 Diogo Glória-Silva David Semedo João Maglhães http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.29676v1 2026-03-31T12:32:29Z

Large vision-language models (LVLMs) achieve impressive performance, yet their internal decision-making processes remain opaque, making it difficult to determine if the success stems from true multimodal fusion or from reliance on unimodal priors. To address this attribution gap, we introduce a novel framework using partial information decomposition (PID) to quantitatively measure the "information spectrum" of LVLMs -- decomposing a model's decision-relevant information into redundant, unique, and synergistic components. By adapting a scalable estimator to modern LVLM outputs, our model-agnostic pipeline profiles 26 LVLMs on four datasets across three dimensions -- breadth (cross-model & cross-task), depth (layer-wise information dynamics), and time (learning dynamics across training). Our analysis reveals two key results: (i) two task regimes (synergy-driven vs. knowledge-driven) and (ii) two stable, contrasting family-level strategies (fusion-centric vs. language-centric). We also uncover a consistent three-phase pattern in layer-wise processing and identify visual instruction tuning as the key stage where fusion is learned. Together, these contributions provide a quantitative lens beyond accuracy-only evaluation and offer insights for analyzing and designing the next generation of LVLMs. Code and data are available at https://github.com/RiiShin/pid-lvlm-analysis .

2026-03-31T12:32:29Z Accepted at ICLR 2026. Project page: https://riishin.github.io/pid-lvlm-iclr26/ Lixin Xiu Xufang Luo Hideki Nakayama http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.29665v1 2026-03-31T12:26:35Z

Agentic systems for business process automation often require compliance with policies governing conditional updates to the system state. Evaluation of policy adherence in LLM-based agentic workflows is typically performed by comparing the final system state against a predefined ground truth. While this approach detects explicit policy violations, it may overlook a more subtle class of issues in which agents bypass required policy checks, yet reach a correct outcome due to favorable circumstances. We refer to such cases as $\textit{near-misses}$ or $\textit{latent failures}$. In this work, we introduce a novel metric for detecting latent policy failures in agent conversations traces. Building on the ToolGuard framework, which converts natural-language policies into executable guard code, our method analyzes agent trajectories to determine whether agent's tool-calling decisions where sufficiently informed. We evaluate our approach on the $τ^2$-verified Airlines benchmark across several contemporary open and proprietary LLMs acting as agents. Our results show that latent failures occur in 8-17% of trajectories involving mutating tool calls, even when the final outcome matches the expected ground-truth state. These findings reveal a blind spot in current evaluation methodologies and highlight the need for metrics that assess not only final outcomes but also the decision process leading to them.

2026-03-31T12:26:35Z Ella Rabinovich David Boaz Naama Zwerdling Ateret Anaby-Tavor http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.29661v1 2026-03-31T12:22:41Z

Existing narrative extraction methods face a trade-off between coherence, interactivity, and multi-storyline support. Narrative Maps supports rich interaction and generates multiple storylines as a byproduct of its coverage constraints, though this comes at the cost of individual path coherence. Narrative Trails achieves high coherence through maximum capacity path optimization but provides no mechanism for user guidance or multiple perspectives. We introduce agenda-based narrative extraction, a method that bridges this gap by integrating large language models into the Narrative Trails pathfinding process to steer storyline construction toward user-specified perspectives. Our approach uses an LLM at each step to rank candidate documents based on their alignment with a given agenda while maintaining narrative coherence. Running the algorithm with different agendas yields different storylines through the same corpus. We evaluated our approach on a news article corpus using LLM judges with Claude Opus 4.5 and GPT 5.1, measuring both coherence and agenda alignment across 64 endpoint pairs and 6 agendas. LLM-driven steering achieves 9.9% higher alignment than keyword matching on semantic agendas (p=0.017), with 13.3% improvement on \textit{Regime Crackdown} specifically (p=0.037), while keyword matching remains competitive on agendas with literal keyword overlap. The coherence cost is minimal: LLM steering reduces coherence by only 2.2% compared to the agenda-agnostic baseline. Counter-agendas that contradict the source material score uniformly low (2.2-2.5) across all methods, confirming that steering cannot fabricate unsupported narratives.

2026-03-31T12:22:41Z Text2Story Workshop 2026 at ECIR 2026 Brian Felipe Keith-Norambuena Carolina Inés Rojas-Córdova Claudio Juvenal Meneses-Villegas Elizabeth Johanna Lam-Esquenazi Angélica María Flores-Bustos Ignacio Alejandro Molina-Villablanca Joshua Emanuel Leyton-Vallejos http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.13802v2 2026-03-31T12:16:39Z

Arabic spans over 30 spoken varieties, yet no open-source text-to-speech system unifies them. Key barriers include substantial cross-dialect lexical and phonological divergence, scarce synthesis-grade data, and the absence of a standardized multi-dialect evaluation benchmark. We present Habibi, a unified-dialectal Arabic TTS framework that addresses all three. Through a multi-step curation pipeline, we repurpose open-source ASR corpora into TTS training data covering 12+ regional dialects. A linguistically-informed curriculum learning strategy - progressing from Modern Standard Arabic to dialectal data - enables robust zero-shot synthesis without text diacritization. We further release the first standardized multi-dialect Arabic TTS benchmark, comprising over 11,000 utterances across 7 dialect subsets with manually verified transcripts. On this benchmark, our unified model matches or surpasses per-dialect specialized models. Both automatic metrics and human evaluations confirm that Habibi is highly competitive with ElevenLabs' Eleven v3 (alpha) in intelligibility, speaker similarity, and naturalness. Extensive ablations (~8,000 H100 GPU hours, 30+ configurations) validate each design choice. We open-source all checkpoints, training and inference code, and benchmark data - the first such release for multi-dialect Arabic TTS - at https://SWivid.github.io/Habibi/ .

2026-01-20T10:02:11Z Yushen Chen Junzhe Liu Yujie Tu Zhikang Niu Yuzhe Liang Chunyu Qiang Chen Zhang Kai Yu Xie Chen http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.29651v1 2026-03-31T12:14:05Z

Semantic interaction (SI) enables analysts to incorporate their cognitive processes into AI models through direct manipulation of visualizations. While SI frameworks for narrative extraction have been proposed, empirical evaluations of their effectiveness remain limited. This paper presents a user study that evaluates SI for narrative map sensemaking, involving 33 participants under three conditions: a timeline baseline, a basic narrative map, and an interactive narrative map with SI capabilities. The results show that the map-based prototypes yielded more insights than the timeline baseline, with the SI-enabled condition reaching statistical significance and the basic map condition trending in the same direction. The SI-enabled condition showed the highest mean performance; differences between the map conditions were not statistically significant but showed large effect sizes (d > 0.8), suggesting that the study was underpowered to detect them. Qualitative analysis identified two distinct SI approaches-corrective and additive-that enable analysts to impose quality judgments and organizational structure on extracted narratives. We also find that SI users achieved comparable exploration breadth with less parameter manipulation, suggesting that SI serves as an alternative pathway for model refinement. This work provides empirical evidence that map-based representations outperform timelines for narrative sensemaking, along with qualitative insights into how analysts use SI for narrative refinement.

2026-03-31T12:14:05Z Text2Story Workshop 2026 at ECIR 2026 Brian Felipe Keith-Norambuena Fausto German Eric Krokos Sarah Joseph Chris North http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.28537v2 2026-03-31T12:08:43Z

Every four years, the PISA test is administered by the OECD to test the knowledge of teenage students worldwide and allow for comparisons of educational systems. However, having to avoid language differences and annotator bias makes the grading of student answers challenging. For these reasons, it would be interesting to consider methods of automatic student answer grading. To train some of these methods, which require machine learning, or to compute parameters or select hyperparameters for those that do not, a large amount of domain-specific data is needed. In this work, we explore a small number of methods for creating a large-scale training dataset using only a relatively small confidential dataset as a reference, leveraging a set of very simple derived text formats to preserve confidentiality. Using the proposed methods, we successfully created three surrogate datasets that are, at the very least, superficially more similar to the reference dataset than a straightforward result of prompt-based generation. Early experiments suggest one of these approaches might also lead to improved training of automatic answer grading models.

2026-03-30T14:59:53Z Pavel Šindelář Dávid Slivka Christopher Bouma Filip Prášil Ondřej Bojar http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.17839v2 2026-03-31T12:00:01Z

Verbal confidence -- prompting LLMs to state their confidence as a number or category -- is widely used to extract uncertainty estimates from black-box models. However, how LLMs internally generate such scores remains unknown. We address two questions: first, when confidence is computed - just-in-time when requested, or automatically during answer generation and cached for later retrieval; and second, what verbal confidence represents - token log-probabilities, or a richer evaluation of answer quality? Focusing on Gemma 3 27B and Qwen 2.5 7B, we provide convergent evidence for cached retrieval. Activation steering, patching, noising, and swap experiments reveal that confidence representations emerge at answer-adjacent positions before appearing at the verbalization site. Attention blocking pinpoints the information flow: confidence is gathered from answer tokens, cached at the first post-answer position, then retrieved for output. Critically, linear probing and variance partitioning reveal that these cached representations explain substantial variance in verbal confidence beyond token log-probabilities, suggesting a richer answer-quality evaluation rather than a simple fluency readout. These findings demonstrate that verbal confidence reflects automatic, sophisticated self-evaluation -- not post-hoc reconstruction -- with implications for understanding metacognition in LLMs and improving calibration.

2026-03-18T15:31:43Z Dharshan Kumaran Arthur Conmy Federico Barbero Simon Osindero Viorica Patraucean Petar Velickovic http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.29617v1 2026-03-31T11:37:50Z

Understanding how the brain processes linguistic constructions is a central challenge in cognitive neuroscience and linguistics. Recent computational studies show that artificial neural language models spontaneously develop differentiated representations of Argument Structure Constructions (ASCs), generating predictions about when and how construction-level information emerges during processing. The present study tests these predictions in human neural activity using electroencephalography (EEG). Ten native English speakers listened to 200 synthetically generated sentences across four construction types (transitive, ditransitive, caused-motion, resultative) while neural responses were recorded. Analyses using time-frequency methods, feature extraction, and machine learning classification revealed construction-specific neural signatures emerging primarily at sentence-final positions, where argument structure becomes fully disambiguated, and most prominently in the alpha band. Pairwise classification showed reliable differentiation, especially between ditransitive and resultative constructions, while other pairs overlapped. Crucially, the temporal emergence and similarity structure of these effects mirror patterns in recurrent and transformer-based language models, where constructional representations arise during integrative processing stages. These findings support the view that linguistic constructions are neurally encoded as distinct form-meaning mappings, in line with Construction Grammar, and suggest convergence between biological and artificial systems on similar representational solutions. More broadly, this convergence is consistent with the idea that learning systems discover stable regions within an underlying representational landscape - recently termed a Platonic representational space - that constrains the emergence of efficient linguistic abstractions.

2026-03-31T11:37:50Z Pegah Ramezani Thomas Kinfe Andreas Maier Achim Schilling Patrick Krauss http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.29608v1 2026-03-31T11:26:45Z

Acute poly-substance intoxication requires rapid, life-saving decisions under substantial uncertainty, as clinicians must rely on incomplete ingestion details and nonspecific symptoms. Effective diagnostic reasoning in this chaotic environment requires fusing unstructured, non-medical narratives (e.g. paramedic scene descriptions and unreliable patient self-reports or known histories), with structured medical data like vital signs. While Large Language Models (LLMs) show potential for processing such heterogeneous inputs, they struggle in this setting, often underperforming simple baselines that rely solely on patient histories. To address this, we present DeToxR (Decision-support for Toxicology with Reasoning), the first adaptation of Reinforcement Learning (RL) to emergency toxicology. We design a robust data-fusion engine for multi-label prediction across 14 substance classes based on an LLM finetuned with Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO). We optimize the model's reasoning directly using a clinical performance reward. By formulating a multi-label agreement metric as the reward signal, the model is explicitly penalized for missing co-ingested substances and hallucinating absent poisons. Our model significantly outperforms its unadapted base LLM counterpart and supervised baselines. Furthermore, in a clinical validation study, the model indicates a clinical advantage by outperforming an expert toxicologist in identifying the correct poisons (Micro-F1: 0.644 vs. 0.473). These results demonstrate the potential of RL-aligned LLMs to synthesize unstructured pre-clinical narratives and structured medical data for decision support in high-stakes environments.

2026-03-31T11:26:45Z Nico Oberländer David Bani-Harouni Tobias Zellner Nassir Navab Florian Eyer Matthias Keicher http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.29559v1 2026-03-31T10:38:22Z

Large Language Models (LLMs) show promise for automated grading, but their outputs can be unreliable. Rather than improving grading accuracy directly, we address a complementary problem: \textit{predicting when an LLM grader is likely to be correct}. This enables selective automation where high-confidence predictions are processed automatically while uncertain cases are flagged for human review. We compare three confidence estimation methods (self-reported confidence, self-consistency voting, and token probability) across seven LLMs of varying scale (4B to 120B parameters) on three educational datasets: RiceChem (long-answer chemistry), SciEntsBank, and Beetle (short-answer science). Our experiments reveal that self-reported confidence consistently achieves the best calibration across all conditions (avg ECE 0.166 vs 0.229 for self-consistency). Surprisingly, self-consistency remains 38\% worse despite requiring 5$\times$ the inference cost. Larger models exhibit substantially better calibration though gains vary by dataset and method (e.g., a 28\% ECE reduction for self-reported), with GPT-OSS-120B achieving the best calibration (avg ECE 0.100) and strong discrimination (avg AUC 0.668). We also observe that confidence is strongly top-skewed across methods, creating a ``confidence floor'' that practitioners must account for when setting thresholds. These findings suggest that simply asking LLMs to report their confidence provides a practical approach for identifying reliable grading predictions. Code is available \href{https://github.com/sonkar-lab/llm_grading_calibration}{here}.

2026-03-31T10:38:22Z Robinson Ferrer Damla Turgut Zhongzhou Chen Shashank Sonkar http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.29557v1 2026-03-31T10:37:47Z

Scientific idea generation (SIG) is critical to AI-driven autonomous research, yet existing approaches are often constrained by a static retrieval-then-generation paradigm, leading to homogeneous and insufficiently divergent ideas. In this work, we propose FlowPIE, a tightly coupled retrieval-generation framework that treats literature exploration and idea generation as a co-evolving process. FlowPIE expands literature trajectories via a flow-guided Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) inspired by GFlowNets, using the quality of current ideas assessed by an LLM-based generative reward model (GRM) as a supervised signal to guide adaptive retrieval and construct a diverse, high-quality initial population. Based on this population, FlowPIE models idea generation as a test-time idea evolution process, applying selection, crossover, and mutation with the isolation island paradigm and GRM-based fitness computation to incorporate cross-domain knowledge. It effectively mitigates the information cocoons arising from over-reliance on parametric knowledge and static literature. Extensive evaluations demonstrate that FlowPIE consistently produces ideas with higher novelty, feasibility and diversity compared to strong LLM-based and agent-based frameworks, while enabling reward scaling during test time.

2026-03-31T10:37:47Z 30 pages, 11 figures, 15 tables Qiyao Wang Hongbo Wang Longze Chen Zhihao Yang Guhong Chen Hamid Alinejad-Rokny Hui Li Yuan Lin Min Yang http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.29552v1 2026-03-31T10:32:25Z

Multilingualism is incredibly common around the world, leading to many important theoretical and practical questions about how children learn multiple languages at once. For example, does multilingual acquisition lead to delays in learning? Are there better and worse ways to structure multilingual input? Many correlational studies address these questions, but it is surprisingly difficult to get definitive answers because children cannot be randomly assigned to be multilingual and data are typically not matched between languages. We use language model training as a method for simulating a variety of highly controlled exposure conditions, and create matched 100M-word mono- and bilingual datasets using synthetic data and machine translation. We train GPT-2 models on monolingual and bilingual data organized to reflect a range of exposure regimes, and evaluate their performance on perplexity, grammaticality, and semantic knowledge. Across model scales and measures, bilingual models perform similarly to monolingual models in one language, but show strong performance in the second language as well. These results suggest that there are no strong differences between different bilingual exposure regimes, and that bilingual input poses no in-principle challenges for agnostic statistical learners.

2026-03-31T10:32:25Z Code and data at https://github.com/styfeng/bilingual-babyLM Linda Zeng Steven Y. Feng Michael C. Frank http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.00314v2 2026-03-31T10:31:18Z

As Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly integrated into healthcare to address complex inquiries, ensuring their reliability remains a critical challenge. Recent studies have highlighted that generic LLMs often struggle in clinical contexts, occasionally producing misleading guidance. To mitigate these risks, this research focuses on the domain-specific adaptation of \textbf{Llama-2-7B} using the \textbf{Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA)} technique. By injecting trainable low-rank matrices into the Transformer layers, we efficiently adapted the model using authentic patient-physician transcripts while preserving the foundational knowledge of the base model. Our objective was to enhance precision and contextual relevance in responding to medical queries by capturing the specialized nuances of clinical discourse. Due to the resource-intensive nature of large-scale human validation, the model's performance was evaluated through a dual-track framework: \textbf{Track A} utilized traditional lexical similarity metrics (e.g., BLEU, ROUGE), while \textbf{Track B} employed an "LLM-as-a-Judge" paradigm using GPT-4 for semantic assessment. Our results demonstrate that while the LoRA-enhanced model achieved significant improvements across all quantitative lexical dimensions, a profound disagreement surfaced in the GPT-4 evaluation, which marginally favored the baseline model's conversational flow. This metric divergence underscores a pivotal finding: traditional automated scores may not fully reflect clinical utility. Consequently, we propose that while automated metrics and LLM judges serve as valuable developmental proxies, rigorous validation by human medical experts remains an indispensable requirement for the safe deployment of LLMs in healthcare settings.

2026-02-27T21:09:43Z Bian Sun Zhenjian Wang Orvill de la Torre Zirui Wang http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.12564v5 2026-03-31T10:30:01Z

Tool-augmented LLM agents increasingly operate as multi-turn advisors in high-stakes domains, yet their evaluation relies on ranking metrics that measure what is recommended but not whether it is safe for the user. We present a paired-trajectory protocol that replays real financial dialogues under clean and contaminated tool-output conditions across eight LLMs (7B to frontier), decomposing divergence into information-channel and memory-channel mechanisms. We observe evaluation blindness: recommendation quality is preserved under contamination (UPR~1.0) while risk-inappropriate products appear in 65-93% of turns, invisible to standard NDCG. Violations are information-channel-driven, emerge at turn 1, and persist without self-correction over 23-step trajectories. Even non-extreme perturbations (within-band corruption, narrative-only attacks) evade threshold monitors while producing significant drift. Susceptibility scales with instruction-following fidelity across all eight models. Sparse autoencoder probing reveals models internally distinguish adversarial perturbations but fail to propagate this signal to output; causal interventions (activation patching, feature clamping, direct steering) confirm this representation-to-action gap is structural and resists linear repair. A safety-penalized NDCG variant (sNDCG) reduces preservation ratios to 0.51-0.74. These results motivate trajectory-level safety monitoring for deployed multi-turn agents.

2026-03-13T01:54:00Z There are some experimental error we are looking into to resolve Zekun Wu Adriano Koshiyama Sahan Bulathwela Maria Perez-Ortiz