Image Generation Models: A Technical History

2026-03-29T02:48:56Z

Image generation has advanced rapidly over the past decade, yet the literature seems fragmented across different models and application domains. This paper aims to offer a comprehensive survey of breakthrough image generation models, including variational autoencoders (VAEs), generative adversarial networks (GANs), normalizing flows, autoregressive and transformer-based generators, and diffusion-based methods. We provide a detailed technical walkthrough of each model type, including their underlying objectives, architectural building blocks, and algorithmic training steps. For each model type, we present the optimization techniques as well as common failure modes and limitations. We also go over recent developments in video generation and present the research works that made it possible to go from still frames to high quality videos. Lastly, we cover the growing importance of robustness and responsible deployment of these models, including deepfake risks, detection, artifacts, and watermarking.

Understanding the Anchoring Effect of LLM with Synthetic Data: Existence, Mechanism, and Potential Mitigations

2026-03-29T02:46:50Z

The rise of Large Language Models (LLMs) like ChatGPT has advanced natural language processing, yet concerns about cognitive biases are growing. In this paper, we investigate the anchoring effect, a cognitive bias where the mind relies heavily on the first information as anchors to make affected judgments. We explore whether LLMs are affected by anchoring, the underlying mechanisms, and potential mitigation strategies. To facilitate studies at scale on the anchoring effect, we introduce a new dataset, SynAnchors (https://huggingface.co/datasets/TimTargaryen/SynAnchors). Combining refined evaluation metrics, we benchmark current widely used LLMs. Our findings show that LLMs' anchoring bias exists commonly with shallow-layer acting and can not be eliminated by conventional strategies, while reasoning can offer some mitigation.

VLM-3R: Vision-Language Models Augmented with Instruction-Aligned 3D Reconstruction

2026-03-29T01:33:48Z

The rapid advancement of Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) for 2D images and videos has motivated extending these models to understand 3D scenes, aiming for human-like visual-spatial intelligence. Nevertheless, achieving deep spatial understanding comparable to human capabilities poses significant challenges in model encoding and data acquisition. Existing methods frequently depend on external depth sensors for geometry capture or utilize off-the-shelf algorithms for pre-constructing 3D maps, thereby limiting their scalability, especially with prevalent monocular video inputs and for time-sensitive applications. In this work, we introduce VLM-3R, a unified framework for Vision-Language Models (VLMs) that incorporates 3D Reconstructive instruction tuning. VLM-3R processes monocular video frames by employing a geometry encoder to derive implicit 3D tokens that represent spatial understanding. Leveraging our Spatial-Visual-View Fusion and over 200K curated 3D reconstructive instruction tuning question-answer (QA) pairs, VLM-3R effectively aligns real-world spatial context with language instructions. This enables monocular 3D spatial assistance and embodied reasoning. To facilitate the evaluation of temporal reasoning, we introduce the Vision-Spatial-Temporal Intelligence benchmark, featuring over 138.6K QA pairs across five distinct tasks focused on evolving spatial relationships. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our model, VLM-3R, not only facilitates robust visual-spatial reasoning but also enables the understanding of temporal 3D context changes, excelling in both accuracy and scalability.

Measuring all the noises of LLM Evals

2026-03-29T00:57:41Z

Separating signal from noise is central to experiments. Applying well-established statistical methods effectively to LLM evals requires consideration of their unique noise characteristics. We clearly define and measure three types of noise: prediction noise from generating different answers on a given question, data noise from sampling questions, and their combined total noise following the law of total variance. To emphasize relative comparisons and gain statistical power, we propose the all-pairs paired method, which applies the paired analysis to all pairs of LLMs and measures all the noise components based on millions of question-level predictions across many evals and settings, revealing clear patterns. First, each eval exhibits a characteristic and highly predictable total noise level across all model pairs. Second, paired prediction noise typically exceeds paired data noise, which means reducing prediction noise by averaging can significantly increase statistical power. By measuring all the noises together, we can assess eval results in context, lowering the barrier of using the best analysis to make sound empirical decisions.

A tree interpretation of arc standard dependency derivation

2026-03-29T00:45:43Z

We show that arc-standard derivations for projective dependency trees determine a unique ordered tree representation with surface-contiguous yields and stable lexical anchoring. Each \textsc{shift}, \textsc{leftarc}, and \textsc{rightarc} transition corresponds to a deterministic tree update, and the resulting hierarchical object uniquely determines the original dependency arcs. We further show that this representation characterizes projectivity: a single-headed dependency tree admits such a contiguous ordered representation if and only if it is projective. The proposal is derivational rather than convertive. It interprets arc-standard transition sequences directly as ordered tree construction, rather than transforming a completed dependency graph into a phrase-structure output. For non-projective inputs, the same interpretation can be used in practice via pseudo-projective lifting before derivation and inverse decoding after recovery. A proof-of-concept implementation in a standard neural transition-based parser shows that the mapped derivations are executable and support stable dependency recovery.

Multi-Agent Dialectical Refinement for Enhanced Argument Classification

2026-03-29T00:03:48Z

Argument Mining (AM) is a foundational technology for automated writing evaluation, yet traditional supervised approaches rely heavily on expensive, domain-specific fine-tuning. While Large Language Models (LLMs) offer a training-free alternative, they often struggle with structural ambiguity, failing to distinguish between similar components like Claims and Premises. Furthermore, single-agent self-correction mechanisms often suffer from sycophancy, where the model reinforces its own initial errors rather than critically evaluating them. We introduce MAD-ACC (Multi-Agent Debate for Argument Component Classification), a framework that leverages dialectical refinement to resolve classification uncertainty. MAD-ACC utilizes a Proponent-Opponent-Judge model where agents defend conflicting interpretations of ambiguous text, exposing logical nuances that single-agent models miss. Evaluation on the UKP Student Essays corpus demonstrates that MAD-ACC achieves a Macro F1 score of 85.7%, significantly outperforming single-agent reasoning baselines, without requiring domain-specific training. Additionally, unlike "black-box" classifiers, MAD-ACC's dialectical approach offers a transparent and explainable alternative by generating human-readable debate transcripts that explain the reasoning behind decisions.

Schema for In-Context Learning

2026-03-28T23:27:33Z

In-Context Learning (ICL) enables transformer-based language models to adapt to new tasks by conditioning on demonstration examples. However, traditional example-driven in-context learning lacks explicit modules for knowledge retrieval and transfer at the abstraction level. Inspired by cognitive science, specifically schema theory, which holds that humans interpret new information by activating pre-existing mental frameworks (schemas) to structure understanding, we introduce Schema-Activated In-Context Learning (SA-ICL). This framework extracts the representation of the building blocks of cognition for the reasoning process instilled from prior examples, creating an abstracted schema, a lightweight, structured template of key inferential steps and their relationships, which is then used to augment a model's reasoning process when presented with a novel question. We demonstrate that a broad range of large language models (LLMs) lack the capacity to form and utilize internal schema-based learning representations implicitly, but instead benefit significantly from explicit schema-based scaffolding. Across chemistry and physics questions from the GPQA dataset, our experiments show that SA-ICL consistently boosts performance, up to 36.19 percent, when the single demonstration example is of high quality, which simultaneously reduces reliance on the number of demonstrations and enhances interpretability. Schema-Activated In-Context Learning not only bridges disparate ICL strategies ranging from pattern priming to Chain-of-Thought prompting, but also paves a new path for enhancing human-like reasoning in LLMs.

Improving Attributed Long-form Question Answering with Intent Awareness

2026-03-28T22:37:25Z

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly being used to generate comprehensive, knowledge-intensive reports. However, while these models are trained on diverse academic papers and reports, they are not exposed to the reasoning processes and intents that guide authors in crafting these documents. We hypothesize that enhancing a model's intent awareness can significantly improve the quality of generated long-form reports. We develop and employ structured, tag-based schemes to better elicit underlying implicit intents to write or cite. We demonstrate that these extracted intents enhance both zero-shot generation capabilities in LLMs and enable the creation of high-quality synthetic data for fine-tuning smaller models. Our experiments reveal improved performance across various challenging scientific report generation tasks, with an average improvement of +2.9 and +12.3 absolute points for large and small models over baselines, respectively. Furthermore, our analysis illuminates how intent awareness enhances model citation usage and substantially improves report readability.

sebis at ArchEHR-QA 2026: How Much Can You Do Locally? Evaluating Grounded EHR QA on a Single Notebook

2026-03-28T21:20:26Z

Clinical question answering over electronic health records (EHRs) can help clinicians and patients access relevant medical information more efficiently. However, many recent approaches rely on large cloud-based models, which are difficult to deploy in clinical environments due to privacy constraints and computational requirements. In this work, we investigate how far grounded EHR question answering can be pushed when restricted to a single notebook. We participate in all four subtasks of the ArchEHR-QA 2026 shared task and evaluate several approaches designed to run on commodity hardware. All experiments are conducted locally without external APIs or cloud infrastructure. Our results show that such systems can achieve competitive performance on the shared task leaderboards. In particular, our submissions perform above average in two subtasks, and we observe that smaller models can approach the performance of much larger systems when properly configured. These findings suggest that privacy-preserving EHR QA systems running fully locally are feasible with current models and commodity hardware. The source code is available at https://github.com/ibrahimey/ArchEHR-QA-2026.

The Geometry of Harmful Intent: Training-Free Anomaly Detection via Angular Deviation in LLM Residual Streams

2026-03-28T21:19:58Z

We present LatentBiopsy, a training-free method for detecting harmful prompts by analysing the geometry of residual-stream activations in large language models. Given 200 safe normative prompts, LatentBiopsy computes the leading principal component of their activations at a target layer and characterises new prompts by their radial deviation angle $θ$ from this reference direction. The anomaly score is the negative log-likelihood of $θ$ under a Gaussian fit to the normative distribution, flagging deviations symmetrically regardless of orientation. No harmful examples are required for training. We evaluate two complete model triplets from the Qwen3.5-0.8B and Qwen2.5-0.5B families: base, instruction-tuned, and \emph{abliterated} (refusal direction surgically removed via orthogonalisation). Across all six variants, LatentBiopsy achieves AUROC $\geq$0.937 for harmful-vs-normative detection and AUROC = 1.000 for discriminating harmful from benign-aggressive prompts (XSTest), with sub-millisecond per-query overhead. Three empirical findings emerge. First, geometry survives refusal ablation: both abliterated variants achieve AUROC at most 0.015 below their instruction-tuned counterparts, establishing a geometric dissociation between harmful-intent representation and the downstream generative refusal mechanism. Second, harmful prompts exhibit a near-degenerate angular distribution ($σ_θ\approx 0.03$ rad), an order of magnitude tighter than the normative distribution ($σ_θ\approx 0.27$ rad), preserved across all alignment stages including abliteration. Third, the two families exhibit opposite ring orientations at the same depth: harmful prompts occupy the outer ring in Qwen3.5-0.8B but the inner ring in Qwen2.5-0.5B, directly motivating the direction-agnostic scoring rule.

Heterogeneous Debate Engine: Identity-Grounded Cognitive Architecture for Resilient LLM-Based Ethical Tutoring

2026-03-28T20:50:21Z

Large Language Models (LLMs) are being increasingly used as autonomous agents in complex reasoning tasks, opening the niche for dialectical interactions. However, Multi-Agent systems implemented with systematically unconstrained systems systematically undergo semantic drift and logical deterioration and thus can hardly be used in providing ethical tutoring where a precise answer is required. Current simulation often tends to degenerate into dialectical stagnation, the agents degenerate into recursive concurrence or circular arguments. A critical challenge remains: how to enforce doctrinal fidelity without suppressing the generative flexibility required for dialectical reasoning? To address this niche, we contribute the Heterogeneous Debate Engine (HDE), a cognitive architecture that combines Identity-Grounded Retrieval-Augmented Generation (ID-RAG) for doctrinal fidelity and Heuristic Theory of Mind for strategic opponent modeling. Our evaluation shows that architectural heterogeneity is a crucial variable to stability: contrary doctrinal initializations (e.g., Deontology vs. Utilitarianism) have increased the Argument Complexity Scores of students by an order of magnitude, over baselines. These findings validate the effectiveness of ID-RAG and Heuristic ToM as architectural requirements in maintaining high-fidelity (adversarial) pedagogy.

Compounding Disadvantage: Auditing Intersectional Bias in LLM-Generated Explanations Across Indian and American STEM Education

2026-03-28T20:49:05Z

Large Language Models (LLMs) are rapidly being adopted by STEM-focused educational institutions and students worldwide. They generate personalized instructions, explanations, and provide feedback on demand. However, these systems tailor instruction to demographic signals rather than demonstrated ability. In such cases, personalization becomes a mechanism of inequality. We conduct one of the first large-scale intersectional audits of LLM-generated STEM educational content, constructing synthetic student profiles. We combine dimensions specific to Indian education (caste, medium of instruction, college tier) and American education (race, HBCU attendance, school type), alongside shared dimensions of income, gender, and disability. We audit four LLMs (Qwen 2.5-32B-Instruct, GPT-4o, GPT-4o-mini, GPT-OSS 20B) across ranking and generation tasks on two STEM datasets, evaluating outputs with FDR-corrected significance testing and SHAP feature attribution. Across both cultural contexts, marginalized profiles receive lower-quality outputs. Income is the most pervasive bias, producing significant effects across every model and context. Disability triggers simpler explanations. Intersectional analysis reveals non-additive compounding: the gap between the most privileged and most marginalized profiles reaches 2.55 grade levels. These biases persist even when marginalized students attend elite institutions. All four models converge on similar patterns. These findings carry direct design and policy implications for incorporating AI into global STEM education.

Alignment Whack-a-Mole : Finetuning Activates Verbatim Recall of Copyrighted Books in Large Language Models

2026-03-28T19:27:47Z

Frontier LLM companies have repeatedly assured courts and regulators that their models do not store copies of training data. They further rely on safety alignment strategies via RLHF, system prompts, and output filters to block verbatim regurgitation of copyrighted works, and have cited the efficacy of these measures in their legal defenses against copyright infringement claims. We show that finetuning bypasses these protections: by training models to expand plot summaries into full text, a task naturally suited for commercial writing assistants, we cause GPT-4o, Gemini-2.5-Pro, and DeepSeek-V3.1 to reproduce up to 85-90% of held-out copyrighted books, with single verbatim spans exceeding 460 words, using only semantic descriptions as prompts and no actual book text. This extraction generalizes across authors: finetuning exclusively on Haruki Murakami's novels unlocks verbatim recall of copyrighted books from over 30 unrelated authors. The effect is not specific to any training author or corpus: random author pairs and public-domain finetuning data produce comparable extraction, while finetuning on synthetic text yields near-zero extraction, indicating that finetuning on individual authors' works reactivates latent memorization from pretraining. Three models from different providers memorize the same books in the same regions ($r \ge 0.90$), pointing to an industry-wide vulnerability. Our findings offer compelling evidence that model weights store copies of copyrighted works and that the security failures that manifest after finetuning on individual authors' works undermine a key premise of recent fair use rulings, where courts have conditioned favorable outcomes on the adequacy of measures preventing reproduction of protected expression.

Continual Robot Skill and Task Learning via Dialogue

2026-03-28T18:34:40Z

Interactive robot learning is a challenging problem as the robot is present with human users who expect the robot to learn novel skills to solve novel tasks perpetually with sample efficiency. In this work we present a framework for robots to continually learn tasks and visuo-motor skills and query for novel skills via dialog interactions with human users. Our robot agent maintains a skill library, and uses an existing LLM to perform grounded dialog interactions to query unknown skills from real human users. We developed a novel visual-motor control policy Action Chunking Transformer with Low Rank Adaptation (ACT-LoRA) that can continually learn novel skills using only a few demonstrations which is critical in human-robot interaction scenarios. The paper has twin goals: Firstly to demonstrate better continual learning in simulation; and secondly, to demonstrate the use of our dialog based learning framework in a realistic human-robot interaction use case. Our ACT-LoRA policy consistently outperforms a GMM-LoRA baseline on multiple continual learning simulation benchmarks by achieving > 300% improvements on novel skills, while achieving comparable performance in existing skills. Moreover, with our IRB approved human-subjects study we demonstrate that our dialog based continual learning framework allows users to teach robots cooking skills successfully (100%) while spending a higher ratio of time on finishing an auxiliary distraction tasks in the test phase of the study compared to a non-learning language based agent (p < 0.001).

Not Worth Mentioning? A Pilot Study on Salient Proposition Annotation

2026-03-28T18:09:16Z

Despite a long tradition of work on extractive summarization, which by nature aims to recover the most important propositions in a text, little work has been done on operationalizing graded proposition salience in naturally occurring data. In this paper, we adopt graded summarization-based salience as a metric from previous work on Salient Entity Extraction (SEE) and adapt it to quantify proposition salience. We define the annotation task, apply it to a small multi-genre dataset, evaluate agreement and carry out a preliminary study of the relationship between our metric and notions of discourse unit centrality in discourse parsing following Rhetorical Structure Theory (RST).