https://arxiv.org/api/80N6nDqj27bXtgxInBGGwtHlKSI2026-03-30T08:39:49Z10514521015http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.24579v1MARCH: Multi-Agent Reinforced Self-Check for LLM Hallucination2026-03-25T17:54:10ZHallucination remains a critical bottleneck for large language models (LLMs), undermining their reliability in real-world applications, especially in Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems. While existing hallucination detection methods employ LLM-as-a-judge to verify LLM outputs against retrieved evidence, they suffer from inherent confirmation bias, where the verifier inadvertently reproduces the errors of the original generation. To address this, we introduce Multi-Agent Reinforced Self-Check for Hallucination (MARCH), a framework that enforces rigorous factual alignment by leveraging deliberate information asymmetry. MARCH orchestrates a collaborative pipeline of three specialized agents: a Solver, a Proposer, and a Checker. The Solver generates an initial RAG response, which the Proposer decomposes into claim-level verifiable atomic propositions. Crucially, the Checker validates these propositions against retrieved evidence in isolation, deprived of the Solver's original output. This well-crafted information asymmetry scheme breaks the cycle of self-confirmation bias. By training this pipeline with multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL), we enable the agents to co-evolve and optimize factual adherence. Extensive experiments across hallucination benchmarks demonstrate that MARCH substantially reduces hallucination rates. Notably, an 8B-parameter LLM equipped with MARCH achieves performance competitive with powerful closed-source models. MARCH paves a scalable path for factual self-improvement of LLMs through co-evolution. The code is at https://github.com/Qwen-Applications/MARCH.2026-03-25T17:54:10ZZhuo LiYupeng ZhangPengyu ChengJiajun SongMengyu ZhouHao LiShujie HuYu QinErchao ZhaoXiaoxi JiangGuanjun Jianghttp://arxiv.org/abs/2510.18019v2Is Multilingual LLM Watermarking Truly Multilingual? Scaling Robustness to 100+ Languages via Back-Translation2026-03-25T17:52:45ZMultilingual watermarking aims to make large language model (LLM) outputs traceable across languages, yet current methods still fall short. Despite claims of cross-lingual robustness, they are evaluated only on high-resource languages. We show that existing multilingual watermarking methods are not truly multilingual: they fail to remain robust under translation attacks in medium- and low-resource languages. We trace this failure to semantic clustering, which fails when the tokenizer vocabulary contains too few full-word tokens for a given language. To address this, we introduce STEAM, a detection method that uses Bayesian optimisation to search among 133 candidate languages for the back-translation that best recovers the watermark strength. It is compatible with any watermarking method, robust across different tokenizers and languages, non-invasive, and easily extendable to new languages. With average gains of +0.23 AUC and +37% TPR@1%, STEAM provides a scalable approach toward fairer watermarking across the diversity of languages.2025-10-20T18:51:20ZAsim MohamedMartin Gubrihttp://arxiv.org/abs/2602.16485v2Team of Thoughts: Efficient Test-time Scaling of Agentic Systems through Orchestrated Tool Calling2026-03-25T17:42:42ZExisting Multi-Agent Systems (MAS) typically rely on homogeneous model configurations, failing to exploit the diverse expertise inherent in different post-trained architectures. We propose Team-of-Thoughts, a heterogeneous MAS framework that treats diverse models as specialized tools within an orchestrator-driven paradigm. Team-of-Thoughts introduces two novel components: (1) Orchestrator Calibration, which identifies models with superior coordination and synthesis capabilities, and (2) Agent Self-Assessment, a protocol where tool agents profile their own domain-specific strengths to guide selection. At inference, the orchestrator dynamically activates the most compatible agents based on these profiles to maximize capability coverage. Across five mathematical reasoning and code generation benchmarks, Team-of-Thoughts consistently outperforms individual models and existing MAS baselines. Notably, on AIME24 and LiveCodeBench, Team-of-Thoughts achieves 96.00% and 77.91% accuracy, respectively, significantly improving over homogeneous role-play baselines (80.00% and 65.93%).2026-02-18T14:19:01Z8 pagesJeffrey T. H. WongZixi ZhangJunyi LiuYiren Zhaohttp://arxiv.org/abs/2511.08126v2Quantification and object perception in Multimodal Large Language Models and human linguistic cognition2026-03-25T17:29:07ZQuantification has been proven to be a particularly difficult linguistic phenomenon for (Multimodal) Large Language Models (MLLMs). However, given that quantification interfaces with the logic, pragmatic, and numerical domains, the exact reasons for the poor performance are still unclear. This paper looks at three key features of human quantification shared cross-linguistically that have remained so far unexplored in the (M)LLM literature: the ordering of quantifiers into scales, the ranges of use and prototypicality, and the biases inherent in the human approximate number system. The aim is to determine how these features are encoded in the models' architecture, how they may differ from humans, and whether the results are affected by the type of model (thinking vs. instruct) and the language under investigation. Results show that although thinking models showed a high accuracy in the numerosity estimation task and in the organization of quantifiers into scales, there are still key differences between humans and LLMs across all model types, particularly in terms of ranges of use and prototypicality values. This work, thus, paves the way for addressing the nature of MLLMs as semantic and pragmatic agents, while the cross-linguistic lens can elucidate whether their abilities are robust and stable across different languages.2025-11-11T11:30:21ZRaquel MonteroNatalia MoskvinaPaolo MorosiTamara SerranoElena PagliariniEvelina Leivadahttp://arxiv.org/abs/2603.24549v1A Sociolinguistic Analysis of Automatic Speech Recognition Bias in Newcastle English2026-03-25T17:24:47ZAutomatic Speech Recognition (ASR) systems are widely used in everyday communication, education, healthcare, and industry, yet their performance remains uneven across speakers, particularly when dialectal variation diverges from the mainstream accents represented in training data. This study investigates ASR bias through a sociolinguistic analysis of Newcastle English, a regional variety of North-East England that has been shown to challenge current speech recognition technologies. Using spontaneous speech from the Diachronic Electronic Corpus of Tyneside English (DECTE), we evaluate the output of a state-of-the-art commercial ASR system and conduct a fine-grained analysis of more than 3,000 transcription errors. Errors are classified by linguistic domain and examined in relation to social variables including gender, age, and socioeconomic status. In addition, an acoustic case study of selected vowel features demonstrates how gradient phonetic variation contributes directly to misrecognition.
The results show that phonological variation accounts for the majority of errors, with recurrent failures linked to dialect-specific features like vowel quality and glottalisation, as well as local vocabulary and non-standard grammatical forms. Error rates also vary across social groups, with higher error frequencies observed for men and for speakers at the extremes of the age spectrum. These findings indicate that ASR errors are not random but socially patterned and can be explained from a sociolinguistic perspective. Thus, the study demonstrates the importance of incorporating sociolinguistic expertise into the evaluation and development of speech technologies and argues that more equitable ASR systems require explicit attention to dialectal variation and community-based speech data.2026-03-25T17:24:47Z54 pages, 11 figuresDana SerditovaKevin Tanghttp://arxiv.org/abs/2603.24543v1Analysing the Safety Pitfalls of Steering Vectors2026-03-25T17:16:11ZActivation steering has emerged as a powerful tool to shape LLM behavior without the need for weight updates. While its inherent brittleness and unreliability are well-documented, its safety implications remain underexplored. In this work, we present a systematic safety audit of steering vectors obtained with Contrastive Activation Addition (CAA), a widely used steering approach, under a unified evaluation protocol. Using JailbreakBench as benchmark, we show that steering vectors consistently influence the success rate of jailbreak attacks, with stronger amplification under simple template-based attacks. Across LLM families and sizes, steering the model in specific directions can drastically increase (up to 57%) or decrease (up to 50%) its attack success rate (ASR), depending on the targeted behavior. We attribute this phenomenon to the overlap between the steering vectors and the latent directions of refusal behavior. Thus, we offer a traceable explanation for this discovery. Together, our findings reveal the previously unobserved origin of this safety gap in LLMs, highlighting a trade-off between controllability and safety.2026-03-25T17:16:11ZYuxiao LiAlina FastowskiEfstratios ZaradoukasBardh PrenkajGjergji Kasnecihttp://arxiv.org/abs/2603.24536v1Robust Multilingual Text-to-Pictogram Mapping for Scalable Reading Rehabilitation2026-03-25T17:12:14ZReading comprehension presents a significant challenge for children with Special Educational Needs and Disabilities (SEND), often requiring intensive one-on-one reading support. To assist therapists in scaling this support, we developed a multilingual, AI-powered interface that automatically enhances text with visual scaffolding. This system dynamically identifies key concepts and maps them to contextually relevant pictograms, supporting learners across languages. We evaluated the system across five typologically diverse languages (English, French, Italian, Spanish, and Arabic), through multilingual coverage analysis, expert clinical review by speech therapists and special education professionals, and latency assessment. Evaluation results indicate high pictogram coverage and visual scaffolding density across the five languages. Expert audits suggested that automatically selected pictograms were semantically appropriate, with combined correct and acceptable ratings exceeding 95% for the four European languages and approximately 90% for Arabic despite reduced pictogram repository coverage. System latency remained within interactive thresholds suitable for real-time educational use. These findings support the technical viability, semantic safety, and acceptability of automated multimodal scaffolding to improve accessibility for neurodiverse learners.2026-03-25T17:12:14ZSoufiane JhilalMartina Gallettihttp://arxiv.org/abs/2603.24535v1Representation Learning to Study Temporal Dynamics in Tutorial Scaffolding2026-03-25T17:11:56ZAdaptive scaffolding enhances learning, yet the field lacks robust methods for measuring it within authentic tutoring dialogue. This gap has become more pressing with the rise of remote human tutoring and large language model-based systems. We introduce an embedding-based approach that analyzes scaffolding dynamics by aligning the semantics of dialogue turns, problem statements, and correct solutions. Specifically, we operationalize alignment by computing cosine similarity between tutor and student contributions and task-relevant content. We apply this framework to 1,576 real-world mathematics tutoring dialogues from the Eedi Question Anchored Tutoring Dialogues dataset. The analysis reveals systematic differences in task alignment and distinct temporal patterns in how participants ground their contributions in problem and solution content. Further, mixed-effects models show that role-specific semantic alignment predicts tutorial progression beyond baseline features such as message order and length. Tutor contributions exhibited stronger grounding in problem content early in interactions. In contrast, student solution alignment was modestly positively associated with progression. These findings support scaffolding as a continuous, role-sensitive process grounded in task semantics. By capturing role-specific alignment over time, this approach provides a principled method for analyzing instructional dialogue and evaluating conversational tutoring systems.2026-03-25T17:11:56ZAccepted as short paper to the 27th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED 2026)Conrad BorchersJiayi ZhangAshish Gurunghttp://arxiv.org/abs/2504.09271v2Linguistic Comparison of AI- and Human-Written Responses to Online Mental Health Queries2026-03-25T17:04:34ZThe ubiquity and widespread use of digital and online technologies have transformed mental health support, with online mental health communities (OMHCs) providing safe spaces for peer support. More recently, generative AI and large language models (LLMs) have introduced new possibilities for scalable, around-the-clock mental health assistance that could potentially augment and supplement the capabilities of OMHCs. Although genAI shows promise in delivering immediate and personalized responses, its effectiveness in replicating the nuanced, experience-based support of human peers remains an open question. In this study, we harnessed 24,114 posts and 138,758 online community (OC) responses from 55 OMHCs on Reddit. We prompted several state-of-the-art LLMs (GPT-4-Turbo, Llama-3, and Mistral-7B) with these posts, and compared their responses to human-written (OC) responses based on a variety of linguistic measures across psycholinguistics and lexico-semantics. Our findings revealed that AI responses are more verbose, readable, and analytically structured, but lack linguistic diversity and personal narratives inherent in human--human interactions. Through a qualitative examination, we found validation as well as complementary insights into the nature of AI responses, such as its neutral stance and the absence of seeking back-and-forth clarifications. We discuss the ethical and practical implications of integrating generative AI into OMHCs, advocating for frameworks that balance AI's scalability and timeliness with the irreplaceable authenticity, social interactiveness, and expertise of human connections that form the ethos of online support communities.2025-04-12T16:20:02Znpj Artificial Intelligence, 2026Koustuv SahaYoshee JainVioleta J. RodriguezMunmun De Choudhuryhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2603.24481v1Multi-Agent Reasoning with Consistency Verification Improves Uncertainty Calibration in Medical MCQA2026-03-25T16:22:53ZMiscalibrated confidence scores are a practical obstacle to deploying AI in clinical settings. A model that is always overconfident offers no useful signal for deferral. We present a multi-agent framework that combines domain-specific specialist agents with Two-Phase Verification and S-Score Weighted Fusion to improve both calibration and discrimination in medical multiple-choice question answering. Four specialist agents (respiratory, cardiology, neurology, gastroenterology) generate independent diagnoses using Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct. Each diagnosis is then subjected to a two-phase self-verification process that measures internal consistency and produces a Specialist Confidence Score (S-score). The S-scores drive a weighted fusion strategy that selects the final answer and calibrates the reported confidence. We evaluate across four experimental settings, covering 100-question and 250-question high-disagreement subsets of both MedQA-USMLE and MedMCQA. Calibration improvement is the central finding, with ECE reduced by 49-74% across all four settings, including the harder MedMCQA benchmark where these gains persist even when absolute accuracy is constrained by knowledge-intensive recall demands. On MedQA-250, the full system achieves ECE = 0.091 (74.4% reduction over the single-specialist baseline) and AUROC = 0.630 (+0.056) at 59.2% accuracy. Ablation analysis identifies Two-Phase Verification as the primary calibration driver and multi-agent reasoning as the primary accuracy driver. These results establish that consistency-based verification produces more reliable uncertainty estimates across diverse medical question types, providing a practical confidence signal for deferral in safety-critical clinical AI applications.2026-03-25T16:22:53Z17 pages, 6 figures. Preprint under reviewJohn Ray B. Martinezhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2603.24472v1Why Does Self-Distillation (Sometimes) Degrade the Reasoning Capability of LLMs?2026-03-25T16:14:52ZSelf-distillation has emerged as an effective post-training paradigm for LLMs, often improving performance while shortening reasoning traces. However, in mathematical reasoning, we find that it can reduce response length while degrading performance. We trace this degradation to the suppression of epistemic verbalization - the model's expression of uncertainty during reasoning. Through controlled experiments varying conditioning context richness and task coverage, we show that conditioning the teacher on rich information suppresses uncertainty expression, enabling rapid in-domain optimization with limited task coverage but harming OOD performance, where unseen problems benefit from expressing uncertainty and adjusting accordingly. Across Qwen3-8B, DeepSeek-Distill-Qwen-7B, and Olmo3-7B-Instruct, we observe performance drops of up to 40%. Our findings highlight that exposing appropriate levels of uncertainty is crucial for robust reasoning and underscore the importance of optimizing reasoning behavior beyond merely reinforcing correct answer traces.2026-03-25T16:14:52ZJeonghye KimXufang LuoMinbeom KimSangmook LeeDohyung KimJiwon JeonDongsheng LiYuqing Yanghttp://arxiv.org/abs/2603.24470v1Counting Without Numbers \& Finding Without Words2026-03-25T16:13:36ZEvery year, 10 million pets enter shelters, separated from their families. Despite desperate searches by both guardians and lost animals, 70% never reunite, not because matches do not exist, but because current systems look only at appearance, while animals recognize each other through sound. We ask, why does computer vision treat vocalizing species as silent visual objects? Drawing on five decades of cognitive science showing that animals perceive quantity approximately and communicate identity acoustically, we present the first multimodal reunification system integrating visual and acoustic biometrics. Our species-adaptive architecture processes vocalizations from 10Hz elephant rumbles to 4kHz puppy whines, paired with probabilistic visual matching that tolerates stress-induced appearance changes. This work demonstrates that AI grounded in biological communication principles can serve vulnerable populations that lack human language.2026-03-25T16:13:36ZBadri Narayana Patrohttp://arxiv.org/abs/2603.24465v1Mechanic: Sorrifier-Driven Formal Decomposition Workflow for Automated Theorem Proving2026-03-25T16:12:08ZRecent advances in large language models (LLMs) and LLM-based agents have substantially improved the capabilities of automated theorem proving. However, for problems requiring complex mathematical reasoning, current systems rarely succeed on the first try and must repeatedly modify their proof strategies. Existing approaches for handling failed attempts typically either discard the entire proof and regenerate it from scratch or iteratively fix errors within the proof. The former is inefficient, as it may abandon mostly correct reasoning due to localized errors, while the latter, although preserving prior progress, leads to progressively longer contexts which progressively degrades the model's ability to attend to the remaining unresolved subproblems. To address this dilemma, we propose Mechanic, a novel agent system that employs a sorry-driven formal decomposition strategy. By leveraging the sorry placeholder in Lean to precisely isolate unresolved subgoals while preserving the surrounding verified proof structure, Mechanic extracts each failed subproblem into a clean, self-contained context and resolves it independently. This avoids both the waste of full regeneration and the excessive context length induced by repeated repairs. Experimental results on challenging mathematical competition benchmarks, including IMO 2025 and Putnam 2025, demonstrate that our agent achieves significant advantages in proving efficiency.2026-03-25T16:12:08ZRuichen QiuYichuan CaoJunqi LiuDakai GuoXiao-Shan GaoLihong ZhiRuyong Fenghttp://arxiv.org/abs/2603.22339v2Problems with Chinchilla Approach 2: Systematic Biases in IsoFLOP Parabola Fits2026-03-25T15:48:59ZChinchilla Approach 2 is among the most widely used methods for fitting neural scaling laws. Its parabolic approximation introduces systematic biases in compute-optimal allocation estimates, even on noise-free synthetic data. Applied to published Llama 3 IsoFLOP data at open frontier compute scales, these biases imply a parameter underallocation corresponding to 6.5% of the $3.8\times10^{25}$ FLOP training budget and \$1.4M (90% CI: \$412K-\$2.9M) in unnecessary compute at 50% H100 MFU. Simulated multimodal model misallocations show even greater opportunity costs due to higher loss surface asymmetry. Three sources of this error are examined: IsoFLOP sampling grid width (Taylor approximation accuracy), uncentered IsoFLOP sampling, and loss surface asymmetry ($α\neq β$). Chinchilla Approach 3 largely eliminates these biases but is often regarded as less data-efficient, numerically unstable, prone to local minima, and harder to implement. Each concern is shown to be unfounded or addressable, especially when the partially linear structure of the objective is exploited via Variable Projection, enabling unbiased inference on all five loss surface parameters through a two-dimensional optimization that is well-conditioned, analytically differentiable, and amenable to dense, or even exhaustive, grid search. It may serve as a more convenient replacement for Approach 2 or a more scalable alternative for adaptations of Approach 3 to richer scaling law formulations. See https://github.com/Open-Athena/vpnls for details and https://openathena.ai/scaling-law-analysis for other results from this study.2026-03-21T09:22:50ZEric CzechZhiwei XuYael ElmatadYixin WangWilliam Heldhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2603.24432v1What and When to Learn: CURriculum Ranking Loss for Large-Scale Speaker Verification2026-03-25T15:41:21ZSpeaker verification at large scale remains an open challenge as fixed-margin losses treat all samples equally regardless of quality. We hypothesize that mislabeled or degraded samples introduce noisy gradients that disrupt compact speaker manifolds. We propose Curry (CURriculum Ranking), an adaptive loss that estimates sample difficulty online via Sub-center ArcFace: confidence scores from dominant sub-center cosine similarity rank samples into easy, medium, and hard tiers using running batch statistics, without auxiliary annotations. Learnable weights guide the model from stable identity foundations through manifold refinement to boundary sharpening. To our knowledge, this is the largest-scale speaker verification system trained to date. Evaluated on VoxCeleb1-O, and SITW, Curry reduces EER by 86.8\% and 60.0\% over the Sub-center ArcFace baseline, establishing a new paradigm for robust speaker verification on imperfect large-scale data.2026-03-25T15:41:21ZMassa BaaliSarthak BishtRita SinghBhiksha Raj