Can LLM Agents Generate Real-World Evidence? Evaluating Observational Studies in Medical Databases

2026-03-24T03:50:34Z

Observational studies can yield clinically actionable evidence at scale, but executing them on real-world databases is open-ended and requires coherent decisions across cohort construction, analysis, and reporting. Prior evaluations of LLM agents emphasize isolated steps or single answers, missing the integrity and internal structure of the resulting evidence bundle. To address this gap, we introduce RWE-bench, a benchmark grounded in MIMIC-IV and derived from peer-reviewed observational studies. Each task provides the corresponding study protocol as the reference standard, requiring agents to execute experiments in a real database and iteratively generate tree-structured evidence bundles. We evaluate six LLMs (three open-source, three closed-source) under three agent scaffolds using both question-level correctness and end-to-end task metrics. Across 162 tasks, task success is low: the best agent reaches 39.9%, and the best open-source model reaches 30.4%. Agent scaffolds also matter substantially, causing over 30% variation in performance metrics. Furthermore, we implement an automated cohort evaluation method to rapidly localize errors and identify agent failure modes. Overall, the results highlight persistent limitations in agents' ability to produce end-to-end evidence bundles, and efficient validation remains an important direction for future work. Code and data are available at https://github.com/somewordstoolate/RWE-bench.

DALDALL: Data Augmentation for Lexical and Semantic Diverse in Legal Domain by leveraging LLM-Persona

2026-03-24T03:49:09Z

Data scarcity remains a persistent challenge in low-resource domains. While existing data augmentation methods leverage the generative capabilities of large language models (LLMs) to produce large volumes of synthetic data, these approaches often prioritize quantity over quality and lack domain-specific strategies. In this work, we introduce DALDALL, a persona-based data augmentation framework tailored for legal information retrieval (IR). Our method employs domain-specific professional personas--such as attorneys, prosecutors, and judges--to generate synthetic queries that exhibit substantially greater lexical and semantic diversity than vanilla prompting approaches. Experiments on the CLERC and COLIEE benchmarks demonstrate that persona-based augmentation achieves improvement in lexical diversity as measured by Self-BLEU scores, while preserving semantic fidelity to the original queries. Furthermore, dense retrievers fine-tuned on persona-augmented data consistently achieve competitive or superior recall performance compared to those trained on original data or generic augmentations. These findings establish persona-based prompting as an effective strategy for generating high-quality training data in specialized, low-resource domains.

DualEdit: Mitigating Safety Fallback in LLM Backdoor Editing via Affirmation-Refusal Regulation

2026-03-24T03:43:32Z

Safety-aligned large language models (LLMs) remain vulnerable to backdoor attacks. Recent model editing-based approaches enable efficient backdoor injection by directly modifying a small set of parameters to map triggers to attacker-desired behaviors. However, we find that existing editing-based attacks are often unstable under safety alignment: the edited model may start with an affirmative prefix but later revert to refusals during generation. We term this phenomenon safety fallback. To mitigate it, we propose DualEdit, a dual-objective model editing framework that simultaneously promotes affirmative tokens and suppresses refusal tokens. DualEdit further addresses two key challenges, objective imbalance and refusal diversity, via two complementary techniques: (1) dynamic loss weighting, which calibrates the relative scales of the two objectives using the pre-edited model to stabilize optimization, and (2) value anchoring, which clusters representative attention value vectors to form compact anchors, reducing conflicts from overly diverse token sets and improving generalization. Experiments on safety-aligned LLMs show that DualEdit improves attack success by 10% and reduces safety fallback rate by 11% over baselines.

KALAVAI: Predicting When Independent Specialist Fusion Works -- A Quantitative Model for Post-Hoc Cooperative LLM Training

2026-03-24T03:32:04Z

Independently trained domain specialists can be fused post-hoc into a single model that outperforms any individual specialist, and the gain is predictable: gain = 0.82 x divergence - 2.72 (R^2 = 0.856, n=6, 3-26% divergence). This enables practitioners to estimate cooperative value before committing compute. Below ~3.3% divergence, gains approach zero.In the KALAVAI protocol, contributors fine-tune copies of a shared checkpoint independently, then submit for lightweight MoE routing (500 steps). Gains are consistent: +7.72% at 410M (+/-0.02%, 3 seeds), +7.49% at 1B (+/-0.01%, 3 seeds), +6.53% at 6.9B, each over the best specialist. The router matches domain-oracle routing within <10^{-5} nats. Cross-lingual fusion (Tamil/Yoruba/Welsh/Code) achieves +21.76%, with Yoruba perplexity falling 41.9 to 7.7. A 20-contributor federation achieves +16.71% (+/-0.07pp, 3 seeds).Three requirements bound the protocol. Shared initialisation is necessary: checkpoint mismatch degrades routing. Frozen layers are optional below ~10,000 steps and beneficial beyond. Learned routing is essential: uniform averaging degrades by -1.2% vs. best specialist, while any trained router achieves oracle-optimal assignment.

PRISM: A Dual View of LLM Reasoning through Semantic Flow and Latent Computation

2026-03-24T03:31:53Z

Large language models (LLMs) solve complex problems by generating multi-step reasoning traces. Yet these traces are typically analyzed from only one of two perspectives: the sequence of tokens across different reasoning steps in the generated text, or the hidden-state vectors across model layers within one step. We introduce PRISM (Probabilistic Reasoning Inspection through Semantic and Implicit Modeling), a framework and diagnostic tool for jointly analyzing both levels, providing a unified view of how reasoning evolves across steps and layers. Across multiple reasoning models and benchmarks, PRISM uncovers systematic patterns in the reasoning process, showing that failed trajectories are more likely to become trapped in unproductive verification loops and further diverge into distinct modes such as overthinking and premature commitment, which behave differently once a candidate answer is reached. It further reveals how prompting reshapes reasoning behavior beyond aggregate accuracy by altering both semantic transitions and internal computational patterns. By modeling reasoning trajectories as structured processes, PRISM makes these behaviors observable and analyzable rather than relying solely on final-task accuracy. Taken together, these insights position PRISM as a practical tool for analyzing and diagnosing reasoning processes in LLMs.

Explanation Generation for Contradiction Reconciliation with LLMs

2026-03-24T03:00:17Z

Existing NLP work commonly treats contradictions as errors to be resolved by choosing which statements to accept or discard. Yet a key aspect of human reasoning in social interactions and professional domains is the ability to hypothesize explanations that reconcile contradictions. For example, "Cassie hates coffee" and "She buys coffee everyday" may appear contradictory, yet both are compatible if Cassie has the unenviable daily chore of buying coffee for all her coworkers. Despite the growing reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs), their ability to hypothesize such reconciliatory explanations remains largely unexplored. To address this gap, we introduce the task of reconciliatory explanation generation, where models must generate explanations that effectively render contradictory statements compatible. We propose a novel method of repurposing existing natural language inference (NLI) datasets, and introduce quality metrics that enable scalable automatic evaluation. Experiments with 18 LLMs show that most models achieve limited success in this task, and that the benefit of extending test-time compute by "thinking" plateaus as model size increases. Our results highlight an under-explored dimension of LLM reasoning and the need to address this limitation in enhancing LLMs' downstream applications such as chatbots and scientific aids.

TimeTox: An LLM-Based Pipeline for Automated Extraction of Time Toxicity from Clinical Trial Protocols

2026-03-24T02:56:50Z

Time toxicity, the cumulative healthcare contact days from clinical trial participation, is an important but labor-intensive metric to extract from protocol documents. We developed TimeTox, an LLM-based pipeline for automated extraction of time toxicity from Schedule of Assessments tables. TimeTox uses Google's Gemini models in three stages: summary extraction from full-length protocol PDFs, time toxicity quantification at six cumulative timepoints for each treatment arm, and multi-run consensus via position-based arm matching. We validated against 20 synthetic schedules (240 comparisons) and assessed reproducibility on 644 real-world oncology protocols. Two architectures were compared: single-pass (vanilla) and two-stage (structure-then-count). The two-stage pipeline achieved 100% clinically acceptable accuracy ($\pm$3 days) on synthetic data (MAE 0.81 days) versus 41.5% for vanilla (MAE 9.0 days). However, on real-world protocols, the vanilla pipeline showed superior reproducibility: 95.3% clinically acceptable accuracy (IQR $\leq$ 3 days) across 3 runs on 644 protocols, with 82.0% perfect stability (IQR = 0). The production pipeline extracted time toxicity for 1,288 treatment arms across multiple disease sites. Extraction stability on real-world data, rather than accuracy on synthetic benchmarks, is the decisive factor for production LLM deployment.

Efficient and High-Fidelity Omni Modality Retrieval

2026-03-24T02:56:17Z

Multimodal retrieval is the task of aggregating information from queries across heterogeneous modalities to retrieve desired targets. State-of-the-art multimodal retrieval models can understand complex queries, yet they are typically limited to two modalities: text and vision. This limitation impedes the development of universal retrieval systems capable of comprehending queries that combine more than two modalities. To advance toward this goal, we present OmniRet, the first retrieval model capable of handling complex, composed queries spanning three key modalities: text, vision, and audio. Our OmniRet model addresses two critical challenges for universal retrieval: computational efficiency and representation fidelity. First, feeding massive token sequences from modality-specific encoders to Large Language Models (LLMs) is computationally inefficient. We therefore introduce an attention-based resampling mechanism to generate compact, fixed-size representations from these sequences. Second, compressing rich omni-modal data into a single embedding vector inevitably causes information loss and discards fine-grained details. We propose Attention Sliced Wasserstein Pooling to preserve these fine-grained details, leading to improved omni-modal representations. OmniRet is trained on an aggregation of approximately 6 million query-target pairs spanning 30 datasets. We benchmark our model on 13 retrieval tasks and a MMEBv2 subset. Our model demonstrates significant improvements on composed query, audio and video retrieval tasks, while achieving on-par performance with state-of-the-art models on others. Furthermore, we curate a new Audio-Centric Multimodal Benchmark (ACM). This new benchmark introduces two critical, previously missing tasks-composed audio retrieval and audio-visual retrieval to more comprehensively evaluate a model's omni-modal embedding capacity.

How Utilitarian Are OpenAI's Models Really? Replicating and Reinterpreting Pfeffer, Krügel, and Uhl (2025)

2026-03-24T02:52:06Z

Pfeffer, Krügel, and Uhl (2025) report that OpenAI's reasoning model o1-mini produces more utilitarian responses to the trolley problem and footbridge dilemma than the non-reasoning model GPT-4o. I replicate their study with four current OpenAI models and extend it with prompt variant testing. The trolley finding does not survive: GPT-4o's low utilitarian rate doesn't reflect a deontological commitment but safety refusals triggered by the prompt's advisory framing. When framed as "Is it morally permissible...?" instead of "Should I...?", GPT-4o gives 99% utilitarian responses. All models converge on utilitarian answers when prompt confounds are removed. The footbridge finding survives with blemishes. Reasoning models tend to give more utilitarian responses than non-reasoning models across prompt variations. But often they refuse to answer the dilemma or, when they answer, give a non-utilitarian rather than a utilitarian answer. These results demonstrate that single-prompt evaluations of LLM moral reasoning are unreliable: multi-prompt robustness testing should be standard practice for any empirical claim about LLM behavior.

Who Spoke What When? Evaluating Spoken Language Models for Conversational ASR with Semantic and Overlap-Aware Metrics

2026-03-24T02:01:21Z

Conversational automatic speech recognition remains challenging due to overlapping speech, far-field noise, and varying speaker counts. While recent LLM-based systems perform well on single-speaker benchmarks, their robustness in multi-speaker settings is unclear. We systematically compare LLM-based and modular pipeline approaches along four axes: overlap robustness, semantic fidelity, speaker count, and single- versus multi-channel input. To capture meaning-altering errors that conventional metrics miss, we introduce tcpSemER, which extends tcpWER by replacing Levenshtein distance with embedding-based semantic similarity. We further decompose tcpWER into overlapping and non-overlapping components for finer-grained analysis. Experiments across three datasets show that LLM-based systems are competitive in two-speaker settings but degrade as speaker count and overlap increase, whereas modular pipelines remain more robust.

Detecting Non-Membership in LLM Training Data via Rank Correlations

2026-03-24T01:59:18Z

As large language models (LLMs) are trained on increasingly vast and opaque text corpora, determining which data contributed to training has become essential for copyright enforcement, compliance auditing, and user trust. While prior work focuses on detecting whether a dataset was used in training (membership inference), the complementary problem -- verifying that a dataset was not used -- has received little attention. We address this gap by introducing PRISM, a test that detects dataset-level non-membership using only grey-box access to model logits. Our key insight is that two models that have not seen a dataset exhibit higher rank correlation in their normalized token log probabilities than when one model has been trained on that data. Using this observation, we construct a correlation-based test that detects non-membership. Empirically, PRISM reliably rules out membership in training data across all datasets tested while avoiding false positives, thus offering a framework for verifying that specific datasets were excluded from LLM training.

Synthetic or Authentic? Building Mental Patient Simulators from Longitudinal Evidence

2026-03-24T01:56:33Z

Patient simulation is essential for developing and evaluating mental health dialogue systems. As most existing approaches rely on snapshot-style prompts with limited profile information, homogeneous behaviors and incoherent disease progression in multi-turn interactions have become key chellenges. In this work, we propose DEPROFILE, a data-grounded patient simulation framework that constructs unified, multi-source patient profiles by integrating demographic attributes, standardized clinical symptoms, counseling dialogues, and longitudinal life-event histories from real-world data. We further introduce a Chain-of-Change agent to transform noisy longitudinal records into structured, temporally grounded memory representations for simulation. Experiments across multiple large language model (LLM) backbones show that with more comprehensive profile constructed by DEPROFILE, the dialogue realism, behavioral diversity, and event richness have consistently improved and exceed state-of-the-art baselines, highlighting the importance of grounding patient simulation in verifiable longitudinal evidence.

Mi:dm K 2.5 Pro

2026-03-24T01:00:29Z

The evolving LLM landscape requires capabilities beyond simple text generation, prioritizing multi-step reasoning, long-context understanding, and agentic workflows. This shift challenges existing models in enterprise environments, especially in Korean-language and domain-specific scenarios where scaling is insufficient. We introduce Mi:dm K 2.5 Pro, a 32B parameter flagship LLM designed to address enterprise-grade complexity through reasoning-focused optimization. Our methodology builds a robust data foundation via a quality-centric curation pipeline utilizing abstract syntax tree (AST) analysis for code, gap-filling synthesis for mathematics, and an LLM-based quality evaluator. Pre-training scales the model via layer-predictor-based Depth Upscaling (DuS) and a progressive strategy supporting a 128K token context window. Post-training introduces a specialized multi-stage pipeline, including Reasoning SFT, model merging, and asynchronous reinforcement learning (RL), to develop complex problem-solving skills. "Fusion Training" then rebalances these capabilities with conversational fluency, consistent response styling, and reliable tool-use. The evaluations show that Mi:dm K 2.5 Pro achieves competitive performance against leading global and domestic models. In addition, it sets state-of-the-art results on Korean-specific benchmarks, showcasing deep linguistic and cultural understanding. Finally, Responsible AI evaluations validate safety against attacks, ensuring a secure profile for deployment with a balance of harmlessness and responsiveness.

Improving LLM Predictions via Inter-Layer Structural Encoders

2026-03-24T00:37:44Z

The standard practice in Large Language Models (LLMs) is to base predictions on the final-layer token representations. Recent studies, however, show that intermediate layers encode substantial information, which may contain more task-relevant features than the final-layer representations alone. Importantly, it was shown that for different tasks, different layers may be optimal. In this work we introduce Inter-Layer Structural Encoders (ILSE), a powerful structural approach to learn one effective representation from the LLM's internal layer representations all together. Central to ILSE is Cayley-Encoder, a mathematically grounded geometric encoder that leverages expander Cayley graphs for efficient inter-layer information propagation. We evaluate ILSE across 13 classification and semantic similarity tasks with 9 pre-trained LLMs ranging from 14 million to 8 billion parameters. ILSE consistently outperforms baselines and existing approaches, achieving up to 44% improvement in accuracy and 25% in similarity metrics. We further show that ILSE is data-efficient in few-shot regimes and can make small LLMs competitive with substantially larger models.

Benchmarking Multi-Agent LLM Architectures for Financial Document Processing: A Comparative Study of Orchestration Patterns, Cost-Accuracy Tradeoffs and Production Scaling Strategies

2026-03-24T00:02:47Z

The adoption of large language models (LLMs) for structured information extraction from financial documents has accelerated rapidly, yet production deployments face fundamental architectural decisions with limited empirical guidance. We present a systematic benchmark comparing four multi-agent orchestration architectures: sequential pipeline, parallel fan-out with merge, hierarchical supervisor-worker and reflexive self-correcting loop. These are evaluated across five frontier and open-weight LLMs on a corpus of 10,000 SEC filings (10-K, 10-Q and 8-K forms). Our evaluation spans 25 extraction field types covering governance structures, executive compensation and financial metrics, measured along five axes: field-level F1, document-level accuracy, end-to-end latency, cost per document and token efficiency. We find that reflexive architectures achieve the highest field-level F1 (0.943) but at 2.3x the cost of sequential baselines, while hierarchical architectures occupy the most favorable position on the cost-accuracy Pareto frontier (F1 0.921 at 1.4x cost). We further present ablation studies on semantic caching, model routing and adaptive retry strategies, demonstrating that hybrid configurations can recover 89\% of the reflexive architecture's accuracy gains at only 1.15x baseline cost. Our scaling analysis from 1K to 100K documents per day reveals non-obvious throughput-accuracy degradation curves that inform capacity planning. These findings provide actionable guidance for practitioners deploying multi-agent LLM systems in regulated financial environments.