https://arxiv.org/api/8uFoBoiLjBbRb7TGue7DQsV8ypI 2026-03-26T12:43:40Z 105024 120 15 http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.23292v1 2026-03-24T14:55:12Z

Benchmarks and leaderboards are how NLP most often communicates progress, but in the LLM era they are increasingly easy to misread. Scores can reflect benchmark-chasing, hidden evaluation choices, or accidental exposure to test content -- not just broad capability. Closed benchmarks delay some of these issues, but reduce transparency and make it harder for the community to learn from results. We argue for a complementary practice: an Olympiad-style evaluation event where problems are sealed until evaluation, submissions are frozen in advance, and all entries run through one standardized harness. After scoring, the full task set and evaluation code are released so results can be reproduced and audited. This design aims to make strong performance harder to ``manufacture'' and easier to trust.

2026-03-24T14:55:12Z Jan Christian Blaise Cruz Alham Fikri Aji http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.23251v1 2026-03-24T14:17:02Z

The advancing fluency of LLMs raises important questions about their ability to emulate complex human traits, including emotional expression and personality, across diverse linguistic and cultural contexts. This study investigates whether LLMs can convincingly mimic emotional nuance in English and personality markers in Arabic, a critical under-resourced language with unique linguistic and cultural characteristics. We conduct two tasks across six models:Jais, Mistral, LLaMA, GPT-4o, Gemini, and DeepSeek. First, we evaluate whether machine classifiers can reliably distinguish between human-authored and AI-generated texts. Second, we assess the extent to which LLM-generated texts exhibit emotional or personality traits comparable to those of humans. Our results demonstrate that AI-generated texts are distinguishable from human-authored ones (F1>0.95), though classification performance deteriorates on paraphrased samples, indicating a reliance on superficial stylistic cues. Emotion and personality classification experiments reveal significant generalization gaps: classifiers trained on human data perform poorly on AI-generated texts and vice versa, suggesting LLMs encode affective signals differently from humans. Importantly, augmenting training with AI-generated data enhances performance in the Arabic personality classification task, highlighting the potential of synthetic data to address challenges in under-resourced languages. Model-specific analyses show that GPT-4o and Gemini exhibit superior affective coherence. Linguistic and psycholinguistic analyses reveal measurable divergences in tone, authenticity, and textual complexity between human and AI texts. These findings have implications for affective computing, authorship attribution, and responsible AI deployment, particularly within underresourced language contexts where generative AI detection and alignment pose unique challenges.

2026-03-24T14:17:02Z Preprint. Under review Nasser A Alsadhan http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.22318v2 2026-03-24T14:12:46Z

A fundamental challenge in reasoning is navigating hypothetical, counterfactual worlds where logic may conflict with ingrained knowledge. We investigate this frontier for Large Language Models (LLMs) by asking: Can LLMs reason logically when the context contradicts their parametric knowledge? To facilitate a systematic analysis, we first introduce CounterLogic, a benchmark specifically designed to disentangle logical validity from knowledge alignment. Evaluation of 11 LLMs across six diverse reasoning datasets reveals a consistent failure: model accuracy plummets by an average of 14% in counterfactual scenarios compared to knowledge-aligned ones. We hypothesize that this gap stems not from a flaw in logical processing, but from an inability to manage the cognitive conflict between context and knowledge. Inspired by human metacognition, we propose a simple yet powerful intervention: Flag & Reason (FaR), where models are first prompted to flag potential knowledge conflicts before they reason. This metacognitive step is highly effective, narrowing the performance gap to just 7% and increasing overall accuracy by 4%. Our findings diagnose and study a critical limitation in modern LLMs' reasoning and demonstrate how metacognitive awareness can make them more robust and reliable thinkers.

2025-05-28T13:03:18Z Anish R Joishy Ishwar B Balappanawar Vamshi Krishna Bonagiri Manas Gaur Krishnaprasad Thirunarayan Ponnurangam Kumaraguru http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.05919v3 2026-03-24T14:09:45Z

LLMs are now an integral part of information retrieval. As such, their role as question answering chatbots raises significant concerns due to their shown vulnerability to adversarial man-in-the-middle (MitM) attacks. Here, we propose the first principled attack evaluation on LLM factual memory under prompt injection via Xmera, our novel, theory-grounded MitM framework. By perturbing the input given to "victim" LLMs in three closed-book and fact-based QA settings, we undermine the correctness of the responses and assess the uncertainty of their generation process. Surprisingly, trivial instruction-based attacks report the highest success rate (up to ~85.3%) while simultaneously having a high uncertainty for incorrectly answered questions. To provide a simple defense mechanism against Xmera, we train Random Forest classifiers on the response uncertainty levels to distinguish between attacked and unattacked queries (average AUC of up to ~94.8%). We believe that signaling users to be cautious about the answers they receive from black-box and potentially corrupt LLMs is a first checkpoint toward user cyberspace safety.

2025-11-08T08:30:19Z Alina Fastowski Bardh Prenkaj Yuxiao Li Gjergji Kasneci http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.23229v1 2026-03-24T14:02:48Z

Internet memes represent a popular form of multimodal online communication and often use figurative elements to convey layered meaning through the combination of text and images. However, it remains largely unclear how multimodal large language models (MLLMs) combine and interpret visual and textual information to identify figurative meaning in memes. To address this gap, we evaluate eight state-of-the-art generative MLLMs across three datasets on their ability to detect and explain six types of figurative meaning. In addition, we conduct a human evaluation of the explanations generated by these MLLMs, assessing whether the provided reasoning supports the predicted label and whether it remains faithful to the original meme content. Our findings indicate that all models exhibit a strong bias to associate a meme with figurative meaning, even when no such meaning is present. Qualitative analysis further shows that correct predictions are not always accompanied by faithful explanations.

2026-03-24T14:02:48Z LREC 2026, 18 pages, 10 figures Shijia Zhou Saif M. Mohammad Barbara Plank Diego Frassinelli http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.23219v1 2026-03-24T13:58:09Z

Amidst the rising capabilities of generative AI to mimic specific human styles, this study investigates the ability of state-of-the-art large language models (LLMs), including GPT-4o, Gemini 1.5 Pro, and Claude Sonnet 3.5, to emulate the authorial signatures of prominent literary and political figures: Walt Whitman, William Wordsworth, Donald Trump, and Barack Obama. Utilizing a zero-shot prompting framework with strict thematic alignment, we generated synthetic corpora evaluated through a complementary framework combining transformer-based classification (BERT) and interpretable machine learning (XGBoost). Our methodology integrates Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC) markers, perplexity, and readability indices to assess the divergence between AI-generated and human-authored text. Results demonstrate that AI-generated mimicry remains highly detectable, with XGBoost models trained on a restricted set of eight stylometric features achieving accuracy comparable to high-dimensional neural classifiers. Feature importance analyses identify perplexity as the primary discriminative metric, revealing a significant divergence in the stochastic regularity of AI outputs compared to the higher variability of human writing. While LLMs exhibit distributional convergence with human authors on low-dimensional heuristic features, such as syntactic complexity and readability, they do not yet fully replicate the nuanced affective density and stylistic variance inherent in the human-authored corpus. By isolating the specific statistical gaps in current generative mimicry, this study provides a comprehensive benchmark for LLM stylistic behavior and offers critical insights for authorship attribution in the digital humanities and social media.

2026-03-24T13:58:09Z Preprint. Accepted for publication in Digital Scholarship in the Humanities (OUP) Nasser A Alsadhan http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.23198v1 2026-03-24T13:43:27Z

Scaling autoregressive large language models (LLMs) has driven unprecedented progress but comes with vast computational costs. In this work, we tackle these costs by leveraging unstructured sparsity within an LLM's feedforward layers, the components accounting for most of the model parameters and execution FLOPs. To achieve this, we introduce a new sparse packing format and a set of CUDA kernels designed to seamlessly integrate with the optimized execution pipelines of modern GPUs, enabling efficient sparse computation during LLM inference and training. To substantiate our gains, we provide a quantitative study of LLM sparsity, demonstrating that simple L1 regularization can induce over 99% sparsity with negligible impact on downstream performance. When paired with our kernels, we show that these sparsity levels translate into substantial throughput, energy efficiency, and memory usage benefits that increase with model scale. We will release all code and kernels under an open-source license to promote adoption and accelerate research toward establishing sparsity as a practical axis for improving the efficiency and scalability of modern foundation models.

2026-03-24T13:43:27Z Code and checkpoints available at: https://github.com/SakanaAI/sparser-faster-llms Edoardo Cetin Stefano Peluchetti Emilio Castillo Akira Naruse Mana Murakami Llion Jones http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.23577v1 2026-03-24T13:41:57Z

Large language models (LLMs) generalize smoothly across continuous semantic spaces, yet strict logical reasoning demands the formation of discrete decision boundaries. Prevailing theories relying on linear isometric projections fail to resolve this fundamental tension. In this work, we argue that task context operates as a non-isometric dynamical operator that enforces a necessary "topological distortion." By applying Gram-Schmidt decomposition to residual-stream activations , we reveal a dual-modulation mechanism driving this process: a class-agnostic topological preservation that anchors global structure to prevent semantic collapse, and a specific algebraic divergence that directionally tears apart cross-class concepts to forge logical boundaries. We validate this geometric evolution across a gradient of tasks, from simple mapping to complex primality testing. Crucially, targeted specific vector ablation establishes a strict causal binding between this topology and model function: algebraically erasing the divergence component collapses parity classification accuracy from 100% to chance levels (38.57%). Furthermore, we uncover a three-phase layer-wise geometric dynamic and demonstrate that under social pressure prompts, models fail to generate sufficient divergence. This results in a "manifold entanglement" that geometrically explains sycophancy and hallucination. Ultimately, our findings revise the linear-isometric presumption, demonstrating that the emergence of discrete logic in LLMs is purchased at an irreducible cost of topological deformation.

2026-03-24T13:41:57Z Long Zhang Dai-jun Lin Wei-neng Chen http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.23265v2 2026-03-24T13:39:36Z

Despite rapid advances in autonomous AI scientists powered by language models, generating publication-ready illustrations remains a labor-intensive bottleneck in the research workflow. To lift this burden, we introduce PaperBanana, an agentic framework for automated generation of publication-ready academic illustrations. Powered by state-of-the-art VLMs and image generation models, PaperBanana orchestrates specialized agents to retrieve references, plan content and style, render images, and iteratively refine via self-critique. To rigorously evaluate our framework, we introduce PaperBananaBench, comprising 292 test cases for methodology diagrams curated from NeurIPS 2025 publications, covering diverse research domains and illustration styles. Comprehensive experiments demonstrate that PaperBanana consistently outperforms leading baselines in faithfulness, conciseness, readability, and aesthetics. We further show that our method effectively extends to the generation of high-quality statistical plots. Collectively, PaperBanana paves the way for the automated generation of publication-ready illustrations.

2026-01-30T18:33:37Z Add Citations Dawei Zhu Rui Meng Yale Song Xiyu Wei Sujian Li Tomas Pfister Jinsung Yoon http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.23184v1 2026-03-24T13:32:14Z

Reward modeling represents a long-standing challenge in reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) for aligning language models. Current reward modeling is heavily contingent upon experimental feedback data with high collection costs. In this work, we study \textit{implicit reward modeling} -- learning reward models from implicit human feedback (e.g., clicks and copies) -- as a cost-effective alternative. We identify two fundamental challenges in implicit reward modeling: (1) Implicit preference data lacks definitive negative samples, which makes standard positive-negative classification methods inapplicable; (2) Implicit preference data suffers from user preference bias, where different responses have different propensities to elicit user feedback actions, which exacerbates the difficulty of distinguishing definitive negative samples. To address these challenges, we propose ImplicitRM, which aims to learn unbiased reward models from implicit preference data. ImplicitRM stratifies training samples into four latent groups via a stratification model. Building on this, it derives a learning objective through likelihood maximization, which we prove is theoretically unbiased, effectively resolving both challenges. Experiments demonstrate that ImplicitRM learns accurate reward models across implicit preference datasets. Code is available on our project website.

2026-03-24T13:32:14Z Hao Wang Haocheng Yang Licheng Pan Lei Shen Xiaoxi Li Yinuo Wang Zhichao Chen Yuan Lu Haoxuan Li Zhouchen Lin http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.23172v1 2026-03-24T13:14:50Z

Multilingual intent classification is central to customer-service systems on global logistics platforms, where models must process noisy user queries across languages and hierarchical label spaces. Yet most existing multilingual benchmarks rely on machine-translated text, which is typically cleaner and more standardized than native customer requests and can therefore overestimate real-world robustness. We present a public benchmark for hierarchical multilingual intent classification constructed from real logistics customer-service logs. The dataset contains approximately 30K de-identified, stand-alone user queries curated from 600K historical records through filtering, LLM-assisted quality control, and human verification, and is organized into a two-level taxonomy with 13 parent and 17 leaf intents. English, Spanish, and Arabic are included as seen languages, while Indonesian, Chinese, and additional test-only languages support zero-shot evaluation. To directly measure the gap between synthetic and real evaluation, we provide paired native and machine-translated test sets and benchmark multilingual encoders, embedding models, and small language models under flat and hierarchical protocols. Results show that translated test sets substantially overestimate performance on noisy native queries, especially for long-tail intents and cross-lingual transfer, underscoring the need for more realistic multilingual intent benchmarks.

2026-03-24T13:14:50Z Haoyu He Jinyu Zhuang Haoran Chu Shuhang Yu J T AI Group Hao Wang Kunpeng Han http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.23160v1 2026-03-24T13:01:31Z

Benchmarking AI systems in multi-turn interactive scenarios is essential for understanding their practical capabilities in real-world applications. However, existing evaluation protocols are highly heterogeneous, differing significantly in dataset formats, model interfaces, and evaluation pipelines, which severely impedes systematic comparison. In this work, we present UniDial-EvalKit (UDE), a unified evaluation toolkit for assessing interactive AI systems. The core contribution of UDE lies in its holistic unification: it standardizes heterogeneous data formats into a universal schema, streamlines complex evaluation pipelines through a modular architecture, and aligns metric calculations under a consistent scoring interface. It also supports efficient large-scale evaluation through parallel generation and scoring, as well as checkpoint-based caching to eliminate redundant computation. Validated across diverse multi-turn benchmarks, UDE not only guarantees high reproducibility through standardized workflows and transparent logging, but also significantly improves evaluation efficiency and extensibility. We make the complete toolkit and evaluation scripts publicly available to foster a standardized benchmarking ecosystem and accelerate future breakthroughs in interactive AI.

2026-03-24T13:01:31Z Qi Jia Haodong Zhao Dun Pei Xiujie Song Shibo Wang Zijian Chen Zicheng Zhang Xiangyang Zhu Guangtao Zhai http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.23146v1 2026-03-24T12:46:15Z

The widespread adoption of Large Language Models (LLMs) has made the detection of AI-Generated text a pressing and complex challenge. Although many detection systems report high benchmark accuracy, their reliability in real-world settings remains uncertain, and their interpretability is often unexplored. In this work, we investigate whether contemporary detectors genuinely identify machine authorship or merely exploit dataset-specific artefacts. We propose an interpretable detection framework that integrates linguistic feature engineering, machine learning, and explainable AI techniques. When evaluated on two prominent benchmark corpora, namely PAN CLEF 2025 and COLING 2025, our model trained on 30 linguistic features achieves leaderboard-competitive performance, attaining an F1 score of 0.9734. However, systematic cross-domain and cross-generator evaluation reveals substantial generalisation failure: classifiers that excel in-domain degrade significantly under distribution shift. Using SHAP- based explanations, we show that the most influential features differ markedly between datasets, indicating that detectors often rely on dataset-specific stylistic cues rather than stable signals of machine authorship. Further investigation with in-depth error analysis exposes a fundamental tension in linguistic-feature-based AI text detection: the features that are most discriminative on in-domain data are also the features most susceptible to domain shift, formatting variation, and text-length effects. We believe that this knowledge helps build AI detectors that are robust across different settings. To support replication and practical use, we release an open-source Python package that returns both predictions and instance-level explanations for individual texts.

2026-03-24T12:46:15Z Shushanta Pudasaini Luis Miralles-Pechuán David Lillis Marisa Llorens Salvador http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.23136v1 2026-03-24T12:35:10Z

Automated knowledge graph (KG) construction is essential for navigating the rapidly expanding body of scientific literature. However, existing approaches struggle to recognize long multi-word entities, often fail to generalize across domains, and typically overlook the hierarchical nature of scientific knowledge. While general-purpose large language models (LLMs) offer adaptability, they are computationally expensive and yield inconsistent accuracy on specialized tasks. As a result, current KGs are shallow and inconsistent, limiting their utility for exploration and synthesis. We propose a two-stage framework for scalable, zero-shot scientific KG construction. The first stage, Z-NERD, introduces (i) Orthogonal Semantic Decomposition (OSD), which promotes domain-agnostic entity recognition by isolating semantic "turns" in text, and (ii) a Multi-Scale TCQK attention mechanism that captures coherent multi-word entities through n-gram-aware attention heads. The second stage, HGNet, performs relation extraction with hierarchy-aware message passing, explicitly modeling parent, child, and peer relations. To enforce global consistency, we introduce two complementary objectives: a Differentiable Hierarchy Loss to discourage cycles and shortcut edges, and a Continuum Abstraction Field (CAF) Loss that embeds abstraction levels along a learnable axis in Euclidean space. This is the first approach to formalize hierarchical abstraction as a continuous property within standard Euclidean embeddings, offering a simpler alternative to hyperbolic methods. We release SPHERE (https://github.com/basiralab/SPHERE), a multi-domain benchmark for hierarchical relation extraction. Our framework establishes a new state of the art on SciERC, SciER, and SPHERE, improving NER by 8.08% and RE by 5.99% on out-of-distribution tests. In zero-shot settings, gains reach 10.76% for NER and 26.2% for RE.

2026-03-24T12:35:10Z Devvrat Joshi Islem Rekik http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.01875v2 2026-03-24T12:25:43Z

Knowledge distillation (KD) is an essential technique to compress large language models (LLMs) into smaller ones. However, despite the distinct roles of the student model and the teacher model in KD, most existing frameworks still use a homogeneous training backend (e.g., FSDP and DeepSpeed) for both models, leading to suboptimal training efficiency. In this paper, we present a novel framework for LLM distillation, termed \textbf{KDFlow}, which features a decoupled architecture and employs SGLang for teacher inference. By bridging the training efficiency of FSDP2 and the inference efficiency of SGLang, KDFlow achieves full utilization of both advantages in a unified system. Moreover, instead of transferring full logits across different processes, our framework only transmits the teacher's hidden states using zero-copy data transfer and recomputes the logits on the student side, effectively balancing the communication cost and KD performance. Furthermore, our framework supports both off-policy and on-policy distillation and incorporates KD algorithms for cross-tokenizer KD through highly extensible and user-friendly APIs. Experiments show that KDFlow can achieve \textbf{1.44$\times$ to 6.36$\times$} speedup compared to current KD frameworks, enabling researchers to rapidly prototype and scale LLM distillation with minimal engineering overhead. Code is available at: https://github.com/songmzhang/KDFlow

2026-03-02T13:54:19Z 8 pages, 4 figures, 3 tables, code is available at: https://github.com/songmzhang/KDFlow Songming Zhang Xue Zhang Tong Zhang Bojie Hu Yufeng Chen Jinan Xu