https://arxiv.org/api/MWiSQ2aR7x6w1j8Lz9MQz3R2K/c 2026-03-26T11:03:53Z 105024 105 15 http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.23624v1 2026-03-24T18:07:46Z

Digging-in effects, where disambiguation difficulty increases with longer ambiguous regions, have been cited as evidence for self-organized sentence processing, in which structural commitments strengthen over time. In contrast, surprisal theory predicts no such effect unless lengthening genuinely shifts statistical expectations, and neural language models appear to show the opposite pattern. Whether digging-in is a robust real-time phenomenon in human sentence processing -- or an artifact of wrap-up processes or methodological confounds -- remains unclear. We report two experiments on English NP/Z garden-path sentences using Maze and self-paced reading, comparing human behavior with predictions from an ensemble of large language models. We find no evidence for real-time digging-in effects. Critically, items with sentence-final versus nonfinal disambiguation show qualitatively different patterns: positive digging-in trends appear only sentence-finally, where wrap-up effects confound interpretation. Nonfinal items -- the cleaner test of real-time processing -- show reverse trends consistent with neural model predictions.

2026-03-24T18:07:46Z 8 pages, 5 figures Amani Maina-Kilaas Roger Levy http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.23611v1 2026-03-24T18:01:02Z

Automated testing is essential for evaluating and improving the reliability of Large Language Models (LLMs), yet the lack of automated oracles for verifying output correctness remains a key challenge. We present LLMORPH, an automated testing tool specifically designed for LLMs performing NLP tasks, which leverages Metamorphic Testing (MT) to uncover faulty behaviors without relying on human-labeled data. MT uses Metamorphic Relations (MRs) to generate follow-up inputs from source test input, enabling detection of inconsistencies in model outputs without the need of expensive labelled data. LLMORPH is aimed at researchers and developers who want to evaluate the robustness of LLM-based NLP systems. In this paper, we detail the design, implementation, and practical usage of LLMORPH, demonstrating how it can be easily extended to any LLM, NLP task, and set of MRs. In our evaluation, we applied 36 MRs across four NLP benchmarks, testing three state-of-the-art LLMs: GPT-4, LLAMA3, and HERMES 2. This produced over 561,000 test executions. Results demonstrate LLMORPH's effectiveness in automatically exposing inconsistencies.

2026-03-24T18:01:02Z Accepted for publication in the 40th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE 2025). This arXiv version is the authors' accepted manuscript. DOI: 10.1109/ASE63991.2025.00385 Code: github.com/steven-b-cho/llmorph 40th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE 2025) Steven Cho Stefano Ruberto Valerio Terragni 10.1109/ASE63991.2025.00385 http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.23501v1 2026-03-24T17:59:54Z

Vision Language Models (VLMs) are increasingly used for tasks like medical report generation and visual question answering. However, fluent diagnostic text does not guarantee safe visual understanding. In clinical practice, interpretation begins with pre-diagnostic sanity checks: verifying that the input is valid to read (correct modality and anatomy, plausible viewpoint and orientation, and no obvious integrity violations). Existing benchmarks largely assume this step is solved, and therefore miss a critical failure mode: a model can produce plausible narratives even when the input is inconsistent or invalid. We introduce MedObvious, a 1,880-task benchmark that isolates input validation as a set-level consistency capability over small multi-panel image sets: the model must identify whether any panel violates expected coherence. MedObvious spans five progressive tiers, from basic orientation/modality mismatches to clinically motivated anatomy/viewpoint verification and triage-style cues, and includes five evaluation formats to test robustness across interfaces. Evaluating 17 different VLMs, we find that sanity checking remains unreliable: several models hallucinate anomalies on normal (negative-control) inputs, performance degrades when scaling to larger image sets, and measured accuracy varies substantially between multiple-choice and open-ended settings. These results show that pre-diagnostic verification remains unsolved for medical VLMs and should be treated as a distinct, safety-critical capability before deployment.

2026-03-24T17:59:54Z 11 Pages Ufaq Khan Umair Nawaz L D M S S Teja Numaan Saeed Muhammad Bilal Yutong Xie Mohammad Yaqub Muhammad Haris Khan http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.04945v3 2026-03-24T17:52:36Z

The proliferation of generative models has presented significant challenges in distinguishing authentic human-authored content from deepfake content. Collaborative human efforts, augmented by AI tools, present a promising solution. In this study, we explore the potential of DeepFakeDeLiBot, a deliberation-enhancing chatbot, to support groups in detecting deepfake text. Our findings reveal that group-based problem-solving significantly improves the accuracy of identifying machine-generated paragraphs compared to individual efforts. While engagement with DeepFakeDeLiBot does not yield substantial performance gains overall, it enhances group dynamics by fostering greater participant engagement, consensus building, and the frequency and diversity of reasoning-based utterances. Additionally, participants with higher perceived effectiveness of group collaboration exhibited performance benefits from DeepFakeDeLiBot. These findings underscore the potential of deliberative chatbots in fostering interactive and productive group dynamics while ensuring accuracy in collaborative deepfake text detection. \textit{Dataset and source code used in this study will be made publicly available upon acceptance of the manuscript.

2025-03-06T20:19:38Z 15; To appear in ICWSM 2026 (https://www.icwsm.org/2026/) Jooyoung Lee Xiaochen Zhu Georgi Karadzhov Tom Stafford Andreas Vlachos Dongwon Lee http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.23485v1 2026-03-24T17:52:22Z

Standard evaluation practices assume that large language model (LLM) outputs are stable under contextually equivalent formulations of a task. Here, we test this assumption in the setting of gender inference. Using a controlled pronoun selection task, we introduce minimal, theoretically uninformative discourse context and find that this induces large, systematic shifts in model outputs. Correlations with cultural gender stereotypes, present in decontextualized settings, weaken or disappear once context is introduced, while theoretically irrelevant features, such as the gender of a pronoun for an unrelated referent, become the most informative predictors of model behaviour. A Contextuality-by-Default analysis reveals that, in 19--52\% of cases across models, this dependence persists after accounting for all marginal effects of context on individual outputs and cannot be attributed to simple pronoun repetition. These findings show that LLM outputs violate contextual invariance even under near-identical syntactic formulations, with implications for bias benchmarking and deployment in high-stakes settings.

2026-03-24T17:52:22Z Sagar Kumar Ariel Flint Luca Maria Aiello Andrea Baronchelli http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.23483v1 2026-03-24T17:45:47Z

Agentic multimodal large language models (MLLMs) (e.g., OpenAI o3 and Gemini Agentic Vision) achieve remarkable reasoning capabilities through iterative visual tool invocation. However, the cascaded perception, reasoning, and tool-calling loops introduce significant sequential overhead. This overhead, termed agentic depth, incurs prohibitive latency and seriously limits system-level concurrency. To this end, we propose SpecEyes, an agentic-level speculative acceleration framework that breaks this sequential bottleneck. Our key insight is that a lightweight, tool-free MLLM can serve as a speculative planner to predict the execution trajectory, enabling early termination of expensive tool chains without sacrificing accuracy. To regulate this speculative planning, we introduce a cognitive gating mechanism based on answer separability, which quantifies the model's confidence for self-verification without requiring oracle labels. Furthermore, we design a heterogeneous parallel funnel that exploits the stateless concurrency of the small model to mask the stateful serial execution of the large model, maximizing system throughput. Extensive experiments on V* Bench, HR-Bench, and POPE demonstrate that SpecEyes achieves 1.1-3.35x speedup over the agentic baseline while preserving or even improving accuracy (up to +6.7%), thereby boosting serving throughput under concurrent workloads.

2026-03-24T17:45:47Z Code: https://github.com/MAC-AutoML/SpecEyes Haoyu Huang Jinfa Huang Zhongwei Wan Xiawu Zheng Rongrong Ji Jiebo Luo http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.23406v1 2026-03-24T16:38:46Z

While large language models simulate social behaviors, their capacity for stable stance formation and identity negotiation during complex interventions remains unclear. To overcome the limitations of static evaluations, this paper proposes a novel mixed-methods framework combining computational virtual ethnography with quantitative socio-cognitive profiling. By embedding human researchers into generative multiagent communities, controlled discursive interventions are conducted to trace the evolution of collective cognition. To rigorously measure how agents internalize and react to these specific interventions, this paper formalizes three new metrics: Innate Value Bias (IVB), Persuasion Sensitivity, and Trust-Action Decoupling (TAD). Across multiple representative models, agents exhibit endogenous stances that override preset identities, consistently demonstrating an innate progressive bias (IVB > 0). When aligned with these stances, rational persuasion successfully shifts 90% of neutral agents while maintaining high trust. In contrast, conflicting emotional provocations induce a paradoxical 40.0% TAD rate in advanced models, which hypocritically alter stances despite reporting low trust. Smaller models contrastingly maintain a 0% TAD rate, strictly requiring trust for behavioral shifts. Furthermore, guided by shared stances, agents use language interactions to actively dismantle assigned power hierarchies and reconstruct self organized community boundaries. These findings expose the fragility of static prompt engineering, providing a methodological and quantitative foundation for dynamic alignment in human-agent hybrid societies. The official code is available at: https://github.com/armihia/CMASE-Endogenous-Stances

2026-03-24T16:38:46Z 22 pages, 3 figures Hanzhong Zhang Siyang Song Jindong Wang http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.23404v1 2026-03-24T16:38:09Z

Existing Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) struggle with 3D spatial reasoning, as they fail to construct structured abstractions of the 3D environment depicted in video inputs. To bridge this gap, drawing inspiration from cognitive theories of allocentric spatial reasoning, we investigate how to enable MLLMs to model and reason over text-based spatial representations of video. Specifically, we introduce Textual Representation of Allocentric Context from Egocentric Video (TRACE), a prompting method that induces MLLMs to generate text-based representations of 3D environments as intermediate reasoning traces for more accurate spatial question answering. TRACE encodes meta-context, camera trajectories, and detailed object entities to support structured spatial reasoning over egocentric videos. Extensive experiments on VSI-Bench and OST-Bench demonstrate that TRACE yields notable and consistent improvements over prior prompting strategies across a diverse range of MLLM backbones, spanning different parameter scales and training schemas. We further present ablation studies to validate our design choices, along with detailed analyses that probe the bottlenecks of 3D spatial reasoning in MLLMs.

2026-03-24T16:38:09Z 26 pages, 6 figures Jiacheng Hua Yishu Yin Yuhang Wu Tai Wang Yifei Huang Miao Liu http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.23375v1 2026-03-24T16:06:10Z

The task of building a natural language interface to a database, known as NLIDB, has recently gained significant attention from both the database and Natural Language Processing (NLP) communities. With the proliferation of geospatial datasets driven by the rapid emergence of location-aware sensors, geospatial databases play a vital role in supporting geospatial applications. However, querying geospatial and temporal databases differs substantially from querying traditional relational databases due to the presence of geospatial topological operators and temporal operators. To bridge the gap between geospatial query languages and non-expert users, the geospatial research community has increasingly focused on developing NLIDBs for geospatial databases. Yet, existing research remains fragmented across systems, datasets, and methodological choices, making it difficult to clearly understand the landscape of existing methods, their strengths and weaknesses, and opportunities for future research. Existing surveys on NLIDBs focus on general-purpose database systems and do not treat geospatial and temporal databases as primary focus for analysis. To address this gap, this paper presents a comprehensive survey of studies on NLIDBs for geospatial and temporal databases. Specifically, we provide a detailed overview of datasets, evaluation metrics, and the taxonomy of the methods for geospatial and temporal NLIDBs, as well as a comparative analysis of the existing methods. Our survey reveals recurring trends in existing methods, substantial variation in datasets and evaluation practices, and several open challenges that continue to hinder progress in this area. Based on these findings, we identify promising directions for future research to advance natural language interfaces to geospatial and temporal databases.

2026-03-24T16:06:10Z Samya Acharja Kanchan Chowdhury http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.23355v1 2026-03-24T15:55:02Z

Improving data utilization efficiency is critical for scaling reinforcement learning (RL) for long-horizon tasks where generating trajectories is expensive. However, the dominant RL methods for LLMs are largely on-policy: they update each batch of data only once, discard it, and then collect fresh samples, resulting in poor sample efficiency. In this work, we explore an alternative value-based RL framework for LLMs that naturally enables off-policy learning. We propose ReVal, a Bellman-update-based method that combines stepwise signals capturing internal consistency with trajectory-level signals derived from outcome verification. ReVal naturally supports replay-buffer-based training, allowing efficient reuse of past trajectories. Experiments on standard mathematical reasoning benchmarks show that ReVal not only converges faster but also outperforms GRPO in final performance. On DeepSeek-R1-Distill-1.5B, ReVal improves training efficiency and achieves improvement of 2.7% in AIME24 and 4.5% in out-of-domain benchmark GPQA over GRPO. These results suggest that value-based RL is a practical alternative to policy-based methods for LLM training.

2026-03-24T15:55:02Z Peng-Yuan Wang Ziniu Li Tian Xu Bohan Yang Tian-Shuo Liu ChenYang Wang Xiong-Hui Chen Yi-Chen Li Tianyun Yang Congliang Chen Yang Yu http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.15998v2 2026-03-24T15:30:16Z

Occupations form and evolve faster than classification systems can track. We propose that a genuine occupation is a self-reinforcing structure (a bipartite co-attractor) in which a shared professional vocabulary makes practitioners cohesive as a group, and the cohesive group sustains the vocabulary. This co-attractor concept enables a zero-assumption method for detecting occupational emergence from resume data, requiring no predefined taxonomy or job titles: we test vocabulary cohesion and population cohesion independently, with ablation to test whether the vocabulary is the mechanism binding the population. Applied to 8.2 million US resumes (2022-2026), the method correctly identifies established occupations and reveals a striking asymmetry for AI: a cohesive professional vocabulary formed rapidly in early 2024, but the practitioner population never cohered. The pre-existing AI community dissolved as the tools went mainstream, and the new vocabulary was absorbed into existing careers rather than binding a new occupation. AI appears to be a diffusing technology, not an emerging occupation. We discuss whether introducing an "AI Engineer" occupational category could catalyze population cohesion around the already-formed vocabulary, completing the co-attractor.

2026-03-16T23:17:10Z This manuscript has been withdrawn by the authors pending internal review and substantial revision David Nordfors http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.10001v3 2026-03-24T15:21:45Z

Transformer architectures based on the attention mechanism have revolutionized natural language processing (NLP), driving major breakthroughs across virtually every NLP task. However, their substantial memory and computational requirements still hinder deployment on ultra-constrained devices such as wearables and Internet-of-Things (IoT) units, where available memory is limited to just a few megabytes. To address this challenge, we introduce EmbBERT, a tiny language model (TLM) architecturally designed for extreme efficiency. The model integrates a compact embedding layer, streamlined feed-forward blocks, and an efficient attention mechanism that together enable optimal performance under strict memory budgets. Through this redesign for the extreme edge, we demonstrate that highly simplified transformer architectures remain remarkably effective under tight resource constraints. EmbBERT requires only 2 MB of total memory, and achieves accuracy performance comparable to the ones of state-of-the-art (SotA) models that require a $\mathbf{10\times}$ memory budget. Extensive experiments on the curated TinyNLP benchmark and the GLUE suite confirm that EmbBERT achieves competitive accuracy, comparable to that of larger SotA models, and consistently outperforms downsized versions of BERT and MAMBA of similar size. Furthermore, we demonstrate the model resilience to 8-bit quantization, which further reduces memory usage to just 781 kB , and the scalability of the EmbBERT architecture across the sub-megabyte to tens-of-megabytes range. Finally, we perform an ablation study demonstrating the positive contributions of all components and the pre-training procedure. All code, scripts, and checkpoints are publicly released to ensure reproducibility: https://github.com/RiccardoBravin/tiny-LLM.

2025-02-14T08:33:31Z 24 pages, 4 figures, 14 tables Neural Networks, Volume 200, 2026, 108800, ISSN 0893-6080, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0893608026002625 Riccardo Bravin Massimo Pavan Hazem Hesham Yousef Shalby Fabrizio Pittorino Manuel Roveri 10.1016/j.neunet.2026.108800 http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.23319v1 2026-03-24T15:20:54Z

Temporal Relation Extraction (TRE) requires identifying how two events or temporal expressions are related in time. Existing attention-based models often highlight globally salient tokens but overlook the pair-specific cues that actually determine the temporal relation. We propose WISTERIA (Weak Implicit Signal-based Temporal Relation Extraction with Attention), a framework that examines whether the top-K attention components conditioned on each event pair truly encode interpretable evidence for temporal classification. Unlike prior works assuming explicit markers such as before, after, or when, WISTERIA considers signals as any lexical, syntactic, or morphological element implicitly expressing temporal order. By combining multi-head attention with pair-conditioned top-K pooling, the model isolates the most informative contextual tokens for each pair. We conduct extensive experiments on TimeBank-Dense, MATRES, TDDMan, and TDDAuto, including linguistic analyses of top-K tokens. Results show that WISTERIA achieves competitive accuracy and reveals pair-level rationales aligned with temporal linguistic cues, offering a localized and interpretable view of temporal reasoning.

2026-03-24T15:20:54Z 19 pages, 16 figures, LREC 2026 Duy Dao Do Anaïs Halftermeyer Thi-Bich-Hanh Dao http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.20502v2 2026-03-24T15:16:46Z

Large language models (LLMs) have achieved impressive results in natural language understanding, yet their reasoning capabilities remain limited when operating as single agents. Multi-Agent Debate (MAD) has been proposed to address this limitation by enabling collaborative reasoning among multiple models in a round-table debate manner. While effective, MAD introduces substantial computational overhead due to the number of agents involved and the frequent communication required. In this paper, we propose MARS (Multi-Agent Review System), a role-based collaboration framework inspired by the review process. In MARS, an author agent generates an initial solution, reviewer agents provide decisions and comments independently, and a meta-reviewer integrates the feedback to make the final decision and guide further revision. This design enhances reasoning quality while avoiding costly reviewer-to-reviewer interactions, thereby controlling token consumption and inference time. We compared MARS with both MAD and other state-of-the-art reasoning strategies across multiple benchmarks. Extensive experiments with different LLMs show that MARS matches the accuracy of MAD while reducing both token usage and inference time by approximately 50\%. Code is available at https://github.com/xwang97/MARS.

2025-09-24T19:24:33Z Xiao Wang Jia Wang Yijie Wang Pengtao Dang Sha Cao Chi Zhang http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.23301v1 2026-03-24T15:04:01Z

LLMs are deployed globally, yet produce responses biased towards cultures with abundant training data. Existing cultural localization approaches such as prompting or post-training alignment are black-box, hard to control, and do not reveal whether failures reflect missing knowledge or poor elicitation. In this paper, we address these gaps using mechanistic interpretability to uncover and manipulate cultural representations in LLMs. Leveraging sparse autoencoders, we identify interpretable features that encode culturally salient information and aggregate them into Cultural Embeddings (CuE). We use CuE both to analyze implicit cultural biases under underspecified prompts and to construct white-box steering interventions. Across multiple models, we show that CuE-based steering increases cultural faithfulness and elicits significantly rarer, long-tail cultural concepts than prompting alone. Notably, CuE-based steering is complementary to black-box localization methods, offering gains when applied on top of prompt-augmented inputs. This also suggests that models do benefit from better elicitation strategies, and don't necessarily lack long-tail knowledge representation, though this varies across cultures. Our results provide both diagnostic insight into cultural representations in LLMs and a controllable method to steer towards desired cultures.

2026-03-24T15:04:01Z preprint Simran Khanuja Hongbin Liu Shujian Zhang John Lambert Mingqing Chen Rajiv Mathews Lun Wang