https://arxiv.org/api/3T9jU9WAm3KkEmC1w0lRUYpPf2g2026-06-10T12:51:33Z808821015http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.28100v1A Polynomial Coreset for Furthest Neighbor in Planar Metrics2026-03-30T06:59:51ZA furthest neighbor data structure on a metric space $(V,\mathrm{dist})$ and a set $P \subseteq V$ answers the following query: given $v \in V$, output $p \in P$ maximizing $\mathrm{dist}(v,p)$; in the approximate version, it is allowed to report any $p \in P$ with $\mathrm{dist}(v,p) \geq (1-\varepsilon)\max_{p' \in P} \mathrm{dist}(v,p')$ for an accuracy parameter $\varepsilon \in (0,1)$. A particular type of approximate furthest neighbor data structure is an $\varepsilon$-coreset: a small subset $Q \subseteq P$ such that for every query $v \in V$ there is a feasible answer $p \in Q$.
Our main result is that in planar metrics there always exists an $\varepsilon$-coreset for furthest neighbors of size bounded polynomially in $(1/\varepsilon)$. This improves upon an exponential bound of Bourneuf and Pilipczuk [SODA'25] and resolves an open problem of de Berg and Theocharous [SoCG'24] for the case of polygons with holes.
On the technical side, we develop a connection between $\varepsilon$-coreset for furthest neighbors and an invariant of a metric space that we call an $\varepsilon$-comatching index -- a sibling of $\varepsilon$-(semi-)ladder index, a.k.a, $\varepsilon$-scatter dimension, as defined by Abbasi et al [FOCS'23]. While the $\varepsilon$-(semi-)ladder index of planar metrics admits an exponential lower bound, we show that the $\varepsilon$-comatching index of planar metrics is polynomial, all in $1/\varepsilon$. The exponential separation between $\varepsilon$-(semi-)ladder and $\varepsilon$-comatching is rather surprising, and the proof is the main technical contribution of our work.2026-03-30T06:59:51Zabstract shortened to meet arXiv requirementsKacper KlukHung LeWojciech NadaraMarcin PilipczukHector Tierno Vinayakhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2506.06477v2On geodesic disks enclosing many points2026-03-29T15:55:33ZLet $ Π(n) $ be the largest number such that for every set $ S $ of $ n $ points in a polygon~$ P $, there always exist two points $ x, y \in S $, where every geodesic disk containing $ x $ and $ y $ contains $ Π(n) $ points of~$ S $. We establish upper and lower bounds for $ Π(n)$, and show that $ \left\lceil \frac{n}{5}\right\rceil+1 \leq Π(n) \leq \left\lceil \frac{n}{4} \right\rceil +1 $. We also show that there always exist two points $x, y\in S$ such that every geodesic disk with $x$ and $y$ on its boundary contains at least $ \frac{n}{7+\sqrt{37}} \approx \left\lceil \frac{n}{13.1} \right\rceil$ points both inside and outside the disk. For the special case where the points of $ S $ are restricted to be the vertices of a geodesically convex polygon we give a tight bound of $\left\lceil \frac{n}{3} \right\rceil + 1$. We provide the same tight bound when we only consider geodesic disks having $ x $ and $ y $ as diametral endpoints. We give upper and lower bounds of $\left\lceil \frac{n}{5} \right\rceil + 1 $ and $\frac{n}{6+\sqrt{26}} \approx \left\lceil \frac{n}{11.1} \right\rceil$, respectively, for the two-colored version of the problem. Finally, for the two-colored variant we show that there always exist two points $x, y\in S$ where $x$ and $y$ have different colors and every geodesic disk with $x$ and $y$ on its boundary contains at least $\left\lceil \frac{n}{27.1}\right\rceil+1$ points both inside and outside the disk.2025-06-06T19:04:30ZProsenjit BoseGuillermo EstebanDavid OrdenRodrigo SilveiraTyler Tuttlehttp://arxiv.org/abs/2602.08961v2MotionCrafter: Dense Geometry and Motion Reconstruction with a 4D VAE2026-03-28T04:43:03ZWe present MotionCrafter, a framework that leverages video generators to jointly reconstruct 4D geometry and estimate dense motion from a monocular video. The key idea is a joint representation of dense 3D point maps and 3D scene flows in a shared coordinate system, together with a 4D VAE tailored to learn this representation effectively. Unlike prior work that strictly aligns 3D values and latents with RGB VAE latents-despite their fundamentally different distributions-we show that such alignment is unnecessary and can hurt performance. Instead, we propose a new data normalization and VAE training strategy that better transfers diffusion priors and greatly improves reconstruction quality. Extensive experiments on multiple datasets show that MotionCrafter achieves state-of-the-art performance in both geometry reconstruction and dense scene flow estimation, delivering 38.64% and 25.0% improvements in geometry and motion reconstruction, respectively, all without any post-optimization. Project page: https://ruijiezhu94.github.io/MotionCrafter_Page2026-02-09T17:58:12ZProject page: https://ruijiezhu94.github.io/MotionCrafter_PageRuijie ZhuJiahao LuWenbo HuXiaoguang HanJianfei CaiYing ShanChuanxia Zhenghttp://arxiv.org/abs/2603.27023v1Proximity Alert: Ipelets for Neighborhood Graphs and Clustering2026-03-27T22:23:06ZNeighborhood graphs and clustering algorithms are fundamental structures in both computational geometry and data analysis. Visualizing them can help build insight into their behavior and properties. The Ipe extensible drawing editor, developed by Otfried Cheong, is a widely used software system for generating figures. One particular aspect of Ipe is the ability to add Ipelets, which extend its functionality. Here we showcase a set of Ipelets designed to help visualize neighborhood graphs and clustering algorithms. These include: $\eps$-neighbor graphs, furthest-neighbor graphs, Gabriel graphs, $k$-nearest neighbor graphs, $k^{th}$-nearest neighbor graphs, $k$-mutual neighbor graphs, $k^{th}$-mutual neighbor graphs, asymmetric $k$-nearest neighbor graphs, asymmetric $k^{th}$-nearest neighbor graphs, relative-neighbor graphs, sphere-of-influence graphs, Urquhart graphs, Yao graphs, and clustering algorithms including complete-linkage, DBSCAN, HDBSCAN, $k$-means, $k$-means++, $k$-medoids, mean shift, and single-linkage. Our Ipelets are all programmed in Lua and are freely available.2026-03-27T22:23:06ZGitan BaloghJune CaganBea FatimaAuguste H. GezalyanDanesh SivakumarArushi SrinivasanYixuan SunVahe ZaprosyanDavid M. Mounthttp://arxiv.org/abs/2603.27009v1Visualizing Higher Order Structures, Overlap Regions, and Clustering in the Hilbert Geometry2026-03-27T21:51:45ZHigher-order Voronoi diagrams and Delaunay mosaics in polygonal metrics have only recently been studied, yet no tools exist for visualizing them. We introduce a tool that fills this gap, providing dynamic interactive software for visualizing higher-order Voronoi diagrams and Delaunay mosaics along with clustering and tools for exploring overlap and outer regions in the Hilbert polygonal metric. We prove that $k^{th}$ order Voronoi cells are not always star-shaped and establish complexity bounds for our algorithm, which generates all order Voronoi diagrams at once. Our software unifies and extends previous tools for visualizing the Hilbert, Funk, and Thompson geometries.2026-03-27T21:51:45ZHridhaan BanerjeeSoren BrownJune CaganAuguste H. GezalyanMegan HunlethVeena KailadChaewoon KyoungRowan ShigenoYasmine TajeddinAndrew WaggerKelin ZhuDavid M. Mounhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2603.26964v1Neural Approximation of Generalized Voronoi Diagrams2026-03-27T20:13:13ZWe introduce VoroFields, a hierarchical neural-field framework for approximating generalized Voronoi diagrams of finite geometric site sets in low-dimensional domains under arbitrary evaluable point-to-site distances. Instead of constructing the diagram combinatorially, VoroFields learns a continuous, differentiable surrogate whose maximizer structure induces the partition implicitly. The Voronoi cells correspond to maximizer regions of the field, with boundaries defined by equal responses between competing sites. A hierarchical decomposition reduces the combinatorial complexity by refining only near envelope transition strata. Experiments across site families and metrics demonstrate accurate recovery of cells and boundary geometry without shape-specific constructions.2026-03-27T20:13:13ZPanagiotis RigasGeorge IoannakisIoannis Emirishttp://arxiv.org/abs/2603.26652v1Surfaces without quasi-isometric simplicial triangulations2026-03-27T17:54:24ZWe construct a complete Riemannian surface $Σ$ that admits no triangulation $G\subset Σ$ such that the inclusion $G^{(1)} \hookrightarrow Σ$ is a quasi-isometry, where $G^{(1)}$ is the simplicial 1-skeleton of $G$. Our construction is without boundary, has arbitrarily large systole, and furthermore, there is no embedded graph $G\subsetΣ$ such that $G^{(1)} \hookrightarrow Σ$ is a quasi-isometry. This answers a question of Georgakopoulos.2026-03-27T17:54:24Z9 pages, 3 figuresJames Davieshttp://arxiv.org/abs/2603.26585v1Dynamic Nearest-Neighbor Searching Under General Metrics in ${\mathbb R}^3$ and Its Applications2026-03-27T16:48:15ZLet $K$ be a compact, centrally-symmetric, strictly-convex region in ${\mathbb R}^3$, which is a semi-algebraic set of constant complexity, i.e. the unit ball of a corresponding metric, denoted as $\|\cdot\|_K$. Let ${\mathcal{K}}$ be a set of $n$ homothetic copies of $K$. This paper contains two main sets of results:
(i) For a storage parameter $s\in[n,n^3]$, ${\mathcal{K}}$ can be preprocessed in $O^*(s)$ expected time into a data structure of size $O^*(s)$, so that for a query homothet $K_0$ of $K$, an intersection-detection query (determine whether $K_0$ intersects any member of ${\mathcal{K}}$, and if so, report such a member) or a nearest-neighbor query (return the member of ${\mathcal{K}}$ whose $\|\cdot\|_K$-distance from $K_0$ is smallest) can be answered in $O^*(n/s^{1/3})$ time; all $k$ homothets of ${\mathcal{K}}$ intersecting $K_0$ can be reported in additional $O(k)$ time. In addition, the data structure supports insertions/deletions in $O^*(s/n)$ amortized expected time per operation. Here the $O^*(\cdot)$ notation hides factors of the form $n^\varepsilon$, where $\varepsilon>0$ is an arbitrarily small constant, and the constant of proportionality depends on $\varepsilon$.
(ii) Let $\mathcal{G}(\mathcal{K})$ denote the intersection graph of ${\mathcal{K}}$. Using the above data structure, breadth-first or depth-first search on $\mathcal{G}(\mathcal{K})$ can be performed in $O^*(n^{3/2})$ expected time. Combining this result with the so-called shrink-and-bifurcate technique, the reverse-shortest-path problem in a suitably defined proximity graph of ${\mathcal{K}}$ can be solved in $O^*(n^{62/39})$ expected time. Dijkstra's shortest-path algorithm, as well as Prim's MST algorithm, on a $\|\cdot\|_K$-proximity graph on $n$ points in ${\mathbb R}^3$, with edges weighted by $\|\cdot\|_K$, can also be performed in $O^*(n^{3/2})$ time.2026-03-27T16:48:15ZPankaj K. AgarwalMatthew J. KatzMicha Sharirhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2603.26397v1Approximation Schemes for Subset TSP and Steiner Tree on Geometric Intersection Graphs2026-03-27T13:22:25ZWe give approximation schemes for Subset TSP and Steiner Tree on unit disk graphs, and more generally, on intersection graphs of similarly sized connected fat (not necessarily convex) polygons in the plane. As a first step towards this goal, we prove spanner-type results: finding an induced subgraph of bounded size that is $(1+\varepsilon)$-equivalent to the original instance in the sense that the optimum value increases only by a factor of at most $(1+\varepsilon)$ when the solution can use only the edges in this subgraph.
- For Subset TSP, our algorithms find a $(1+\varepsilon)$-equivalent induced subgraph of size $\mathrm{poly}(1/\varepsilon)\cdot\mathrm{OPT}$ in polynomial time, and use it to find a $(1+\varepsilon)$-approximate solution in time $2^{\mathrm{poly}(1/\varepsilon)}\cdot n^{O(1)}$.
- For Steiner Tree, our algorithms find a $(1+\varepsilon)$-equivalent induced subgraph of size $2^{\mathrm{poly}(1/\varepsilon)}\cdot\mathrm{OPT}$ in time $2^{\mathrm{poly}(1/\varepsilon)}\cdot n^{O(1)}$, and use it to find a $(1+\varepsilon)$-approximate solution in time $2^{2^{\mathrm{poly}(1/\varepsilon)}}\cdot n^{O(1)}$.
- An improved algorithm finds a $(1+\varepsilon)$-approximate solution for Steiner Tree in time $2^{\mathrm{poly}(1/\varepsilon)}\cdot n^{O(1)}$.
An easy reduction shows that approximation schemes for unit disks imply approximation schemes for planar graphs. Thus our results are far-reaching generalizations of analogous results of Klein [STOC'06] and Borradaile, Klein, and Mathieu [ACM TALG'09] for Subset TSP and Steiner Tree in planar graphs. We show that our results are best possible in the sense that dropping any of (i) similarly sized, (ii) connected, or (iii) fat makes both problems APX-hard.2026-03-27T13:22:25Z106 pages, 18 figures. To appear in proceedings of STOC 2026Sándor Kisfaludi-BakDániel Marxhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2003.07989v4GPU-Accelerated Computation of Vietoris-Rips Persistence Barcodes2026-03-26T22:32:02ZThe computation of Vietoris-Rips persistence barcodes is both execution-intensive and memory-intensive. In this paper, we study its computational structure and identify several unique mathematical properties and algorithmic opportunities with connections to the GPU. Mathematically and empirically, we look into the properties of apparent pairs, which are independently identifiable persistence pairs comprising up to 99\% of persistence pairs. We prove tight upper and lower bounds of the apparent pair rate and some probabilistic lower bounds. We also design massively parallel algorithms to take advantage of the very large number of simplices that can be processed independently of each other. Having identified these opportunities, we develop a GPU-accelerated software for computing Vietoris-Rips persistence barcodes, called Ripser++. Under nice sampling conditions, we show that the expected work complexity of our algorithm is near linear in the number of simplices. The expected depth complexity is dependent only on the computation of the expected number of $p$-dimensional homological cycles. The software achieves up to 30x speedup over the total execution time of the original Ripser and also reduces CPU-memory usage by up to 2.0x. We believe our GPU-acceleration based efforts open a new chapter for the advancement of topological data analysis in the post-Moore's Law era.2020-03-17T23:57:37Z56 pages, 16 figures. Extended version of the paper published in Symposium on Computational Geometry 2020Simon ZhangMengbai XiaoHao Wanghttp://arxiv.org/abs/2406.18933v2Crossing Number is NP-hard for Constant Path-width (and Tree-width)2026-03-26T21:00:16ZThe crossing number of a graph is the minimum number of edge crossings that a graph can have when drawn in the plane. Determining this number, known as the Crossing Number problem, is a celebrated problem in combinatorial optimization. It has been known to be NP-complete since the 1980s, and already showing its fixed-parameter tractability when parameterized by the vertex cover number required fairly involved techniques. In this paper, we prove that computing the crossing number exactly remains NP-hard even for graphs of path-width 12 (and as a result, for simple graphs of path-width 13 and tree-width 9).
These results highlight that, although both path- and tree-decompositions have been highly successful tools in many graph algorithm scenarios, general crossing number computation is unlikely (under P $\neq$ NP) to be successfully tackled using graph decompositions of bounded width -- a question that had remained a 'tantalizing open problem' [S. Cabello, Hardness of Approximation for Crossing Number, 2013] till now.2024-06-27T07:00:35ZAn extended abstract of a preliminary version of this paper was presented at ISAAC'24Petr HliněnýLiana Khazaliyahttp://arxiv.org/abs/2508.11555v2Optimal Bounds for Spanners and Tree Covers in Doubling Metrics2026-03-26T20:53:31ZIt is known that any $n$-point set in the $d$-dimensional Euclidean space $\mathbb{R}^d$, for $d = O(1)$, admits: 1) a $(1+ε)$-spanner with maximum degree $\tilde{O}(ε^{-d+1})$ and with lightness $\tilde{O}(ε^{-d})$; 2) a $(1+ε)$-tree cover with $\tilde{O}(n \cdot ε^{-d+1})$ trees and maximum degree of $O(1)$ in each tree. Moreover, all the parameters in these constructions are optimal: there exists an $n$-point set in $\mathbb{R}^d$, for which any $(1+ε)$-spanner has $\tildeΩ(n \cdot ε^{-d+1})$ edges and lightness $\tildeΩ(ε^{-d})$. The upper bounds for Euclidean spanners rely heavily on the spatial property of cone partitioning in $\mathbb{R}^d$, which does not seem to extend to the wider family of doubling metrics, i.e., metric spaces of constant doubling dimension. In doubling metrics, a simple spanner construction from two decades ago, the net-tree spanner, has $\tilde{O}(n \cdot ε^{-d})$ edges, and it could be transformed into a spanner of maximum degree $\tilde{O}(ε^{-d})$ and lightness $\tilde{O}(n \cdot ε^{-(d+1)})$ by pruning redundant edges. Moreover, a careful refinement of the net-tree spanner yields a $(1+ε)$-tree cover with $\tilde{O}(ε^{-d})$ trees. Despite a large body of work, the problem of obtaining tight bounds for spanners and tree covers in the wider family of doubling metrics has remained elusive. We resolve this problem by presenting: 1) a surprisingly simple and tight lower bound, which shows that the net-tree spanner and its pruned version are optimal with respect to all the involved parameters, 2) a new construction of $(1+ε)$-tree covers with $\tilde{O}(n \cdot ε^{-d})$ trees, with maximum degree $O(1)$ in each tree. This construction is optimal with respect to the number of trees and maximum degree.2025-08-15T15:57:14Z24 pages, 1 figure. To appear in SoCG 2026An LaHung LeShay SolomonCuong Than VinayakShuang YangTianyi Zhanghttp://arxiv.org/abs/2603.25449v1Approximating Pareto Sum via Bounded Monotone Min-Plus Convolution2026-03-26T13:45:08ZThe Pareto sum of two-dimensional point sets $P$ and $Q$ in $\mathbb{R}^2$ is defined as the skyline of the points in their Minkowski sum. The problem of efficiently computing the Pareto sum arises frequently in bi-criteria optimization algorithms. Prior work establishes that computing the Pareto sum of sets $P$ and $Q$ of size $n$ suffers from conditional lower bounds that rule out strongly subquadratic $O(n^{2-ε})$-time algorithms, even when the output size is $Θ(n)$. Naturally, we ask: How efficiently can we \emph{approximate} Pareto sums, both in theory and practice? Can we beat the near-quadratic-time state of the art for exact algorithms?
On the theoretical side, we formulate a notion of additively approximate Pareto sets and show that computing an approximate Pareto set is \emph{fine-grained equivalent} to Bounded Monotone Min-Plus Convolution. Leveraging a remarkable $\tilde{O}(n^{1.5})$-time algorithm for the latter problem (Chi, Duan, Xie, Zhang; STOC '22), we thus obtain a strongly subquadratic (and conditionally optimal) approximation algorithm for computing Pareto sums.
On the practical side, we engineer different algorithmic approaches for approximating Pareto sets on realistic instances. Our implementations enable a granular trade-off between approximation quality and running time/output size compared to the state of the art for exact algorithms established in (Funke, Hespe, Sanders, Storandt, Truschel; Algorithmica '25). Perhaps surprisingly, the (theoretical) connection to Bounded Monotone Min-Plus Convolution remains beneficial even for our implementations: in particular, we implement a simplified, yet still subquadratic version of an algorithm due to Chi, Duan, Xie and Zhang, which on some sufficiently large instances outperforms the competing quadratic-time approaches.2026-03-26T13:45:08ZTo appear at SoCG26Geri GokajMarvin KünnemannSabine StorandtCarina Truschelhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2603.23970v2Approximation Schemes and Structural Barriers for the Two-Dimensional Knapsack Problem with Rotations2026-03-26T08:27:14ZWe study the two-dimensional (geometric) knapsack problem with rotations (2DKR), in which we are given a square knapsack and a set of rectangles with associated profits. The objective is to find a maximum profit subset of rectangles that can be packed without overlap in an axis-aligned manner, possibly by rotating some rectangles by $90^{\circ}$. The best-known polynomial time algorithm for the problem has an approximation ratio of $3/2+ε$ for any constant $ε>0$, with an improvement to $4/3+ε$ in the cardinality case, due to G{á}lvez et al. (FOCS 2017, TALG 2021). Obtaining a PTAS for the problem, even in the cardinality case, has remained a major open question in the setting of multidimensional packing problems, as mentioned in the survey by Christensen et al. (Computer Science Review, 2017).
In this paper, we present a PTAS for the cardinality case of 2DKR. In contrast to the setting without rotations, we show that there are $(1+ε)$-approximate solutions in which all items are packed greedily inside a constant number of rectangular {\em containers}. Our result is based on a new resource contraction lemma, which might be of independent interest. In contrast, for the general weighted case, we prove that this simple type of packing is not sufficient to obtain a better approximation ratio than $1.5$. However, we break this structural barrier and design a $(1.497+ε)$-approximation algorithm for 2DKR in the weighted case. Our arguments also improve the best-known approximation ratio for the (weighted) case {\em without rotations} to $13/7+ε\approx 1.857+ε$.
Finally, we establish a lower bound of $n^{Ω(1/ε)}$ on the running time of any $(1+ε)$-approximation algorithm for our problem with or without rotations -- even in the cardinality setting, assuming the $k$-\textsc{Sum} Conjecture.2026-03-25T06:06:33ZDebajyoti KarArindam KhanAndreas Wiesehttp://arxiv.org/abs/2603.24872v1Shortest Paths in Geodesic Unit-Disk Graphs2026-03-25T23:17:44ZLet $S$ be a set of $n$ points in a polygon $P$ with $m$ vertices. The geodesic unit-disk graph $G(S)$ induced by $S$ has vertex set $S$ and contains an edge between two vertices whenever their geodesic distance in $P$ is at most one. In the weighted version, each edge is assigned weight equal to the geodesic distance between its endpoints; in the unweighted version, every edge has weight $1$. Given a source point $s \in S$, we study the problem of computing shortest paths from $s$ to all vertices of $G(S)$. To the best of our knowledge, this problem has not been investigated previously. A naive approach constructs $G(S)$ explicitly and then applies a standard shortest path algorithm for general graphs, but this requires quadratic time in the worst case, since $G(S)$ may contain $Ω(n^2)$ edges. In this paper, we give the first subquadratic-time algorithms for this problem. For the weighted case, when $P$ is a simple polygon, we obtain an $O(m + n \log^{2} n \log^{2} m)$-time algorithm. For the unweighted case, we provide an $O(m + n \log n \log^{2} m)$-time algorithm for simple polygons, and an $O(\sqrt{n} (n+m)\log(n+m))$-time algorithm for polygons with holes. To achieve these results, we develop a data structure for deletion-only geodesic unit-disk range emptiness queries, as well as a data structure for constructing implicit additively weighted geodesic Voronoi diagrams in simple polygons. In addition, we propose a dynamic data structure that extends Bentley's logarithmic method from insertions to priority-queue updates, namely insertion and delete-min operations. These results may be of independent interest.2026-03-25T23:17:44ZA preliminary version will appear in SoCG 2026. This version further improves the result in the preliminary version by proposing a new dynamic data structure for priority-queue updates (Section 4)Bruce W. BrewerHaitao Wang