Ineffectiveness for Search and Undecidability of PCSP Meta-Problems

2026-05-25T16:07:10Z

It is an open question whether the search and decision versions of promise CSPs are equivalent. Most known algorithms for PCSPs solve only their \emph{decision} variant, and it is unknown whether they can be adapted to solve \emph{search} as well. The main approaches, called BLP, AIP and BLP+AIP, handle a PCSP by finding a solution to a relaxation of some integer program. We prove that rounding those solutions to a proper search certificate can be as hard as any problem in the class TFNP. In other words, these algorithms are ineffective for search. Building on the algebraic approach to PCSPs, we find sufficient conditions that imply ineffectiveness for search. Our tools are tailored to algorithms that are characterized by minions in a suitable way, and can also be used to prove undecidability results for meta-problems. This way, we show that the families of templates solvable via BLP, AIP, and BLP+AIP are undecidable. Using the same techniques we also analyze several algebraic conditions that are known to guarantee the tractability of finite-template CSPs. We prove that several meta-problems related to cyclic polymorphims and WNUs are undecidable for PCSPs. In particular, there is no algorithm deciding whether a finite PCSP template (1) admits cyclic a polymorphism, (2) admits a WNU.

A weak regularity lemma for polynomials

2026-05-25T15:42:32Z

A regularity lemma for polynomials provides a decomposition in terms of a bounded number of approximately independent polynomials. Such regularity lemmas play an important role in numerous results, yet suffer from the familiar shortcoming of having tower-type bounds or worse. In this paper we design a new, weaker regularity lemma with strong bounds. The new regularity lemma in particular provides means for quantitatively studying the curves contained in the image of a polynomial map, which is beyond the reach of standard methods. The weak regularity lemma turns out to be powerful enough to yield results on arithmetic circuits and polynomial ranks that may be of independent interest: - A general upper bound on the arithmetic circuit size of low-degree polynomials based solely on their image. - An upper bound on the top fan-in of depth-4 arithmetic formulas under similar conditions. - A quantitative bound for the Green-Tao notion of rank for polynomials, significantly improving on a result of Karam.

Lower Bounds for Approximate Sign Rank

2026-05-25T15:05:06Z

We prove new upper and lower bounds on $ε$-approximate sign-rank, a relaxation of sign-rank introduced by Chornomaz, Moran, and Waknine (STOC 2025). We show that every $m \times n$ sign matrix with approximate sign-rank $d$ contains a monochromatic rectangle of size $d^{-O(d)}m \times d^{-O(d^2)}n$, paralleling classical results for exact sign-rank. As an application, we establish a lower bound of $Ω(\sqrt{d/\log d})$ on the $ε$-approximate sign-rank of large-margin $d$-dimensional half-spaces. Prior to our work, the only general lower bound technique known for approximate sign-rank yielded bounds of strength $ε^{-1} - 1$, which are constant for fixed $ε$. A key ingredient is a new geometric theorem on hyperplane avoidance: for any set of $n$ points in general position in $\mathbb{R}^d$, there exist $d$ subsets, each of size $d^{-O(d)} n$, such that no hyperplane simultaneously splits all of them. The proof combines the Forster-Barthe isotropic position theorem with the Bourgain-Tzafriri restricted invertibility principle. We also study the relationship between approximate sign-rank and VC dimension. We prove a lower bound on approximate sign-rank in terms of VC dimension, and exhibit concept classes of VC dimension $2$ with large approximate sign-rank. Finally, we study the approximate sign-rank of the $2^m \times 2^m$ Hadamard matrix $H_m$. The sign-rank of $H_m$ is known to be $Ω(\sqrt{2^m})$ by Forster's classic theorem. Contrasting this, we adapt an argument of Alman and Williams to show that the approximate sign-rank of $H_m$ is at most $m^{O(\sqrt{m} \log(1/ε))}$, and hence the Hadamard matrix does not witness polynomial-strength lower bounds for approximate sign-rank. Using our VC dimension bound, we prove that the approximate sign-rank of $H_m$ is at least $Ω_ε(m)$.

Probabilistic Computers (So Quantum Computers) Are More Rigorously Powerful Than Traditional Computers, and Derandomization

2026-05-25T06:15:11Z

In this paper, we extend the techniques used in our previous work to show that there exists a probabilistic Turing machine running within time $O(n^k)$ for all $k\in\mathbb{N}_1$ accepting a language $L_d$ that is different from any language in $\mathcal{P}$, and then further to prove that $L_d\in\mathcal{BPP}$, thus separating the complexity class $\mathcal{BPP}$ from the class $\mathcal{P}$ (i.e., $\mathcal{P}\subsetneqq\mathcal{BPP}$). Since the complexity class $\mathcal{BQP}$ of {\em bounded error quantum polynomial-time} contains the complexity class $\mathcal{BPP}$ (i.e., $\mathcal{BPP}\subseteq\mathcal{BQP}$), we thus confirm the widespread-belief conjecture that quantum computers are {\em rigorously more powerful} than traditional computers (i.e., $\mathcal{P}\subsetneqq\mathcal{BQP}$). As an important consequence of the above results, we disprove the {\bf Extended Church-Turing Thesis}. Furthermore, we also show that (1): $\mathcal{P}\subsetneqq\mathcal{RP}$; (2): $\mathcal{P}\subsetneqq{\rm co-}\mathcal{RP}$; (3): $\mathcal{P}\subsetneqq\mathcal{ZPP}$. Previously, whether the above relations hold or not were long-standing open questions in complexity theory. Meanwhile, the result of $\mathcal{P}\subsetneqq\mathcal{BPP}$ shows that {\em randomness} plays an essential role in probabilistic algorithm design. In particular, we go further to show that (4): The number of random bits used by any probabilistic algorithm that accepts the language $L_d$ can not be reduced to $O(\log n)$; (5): There exists no efficient (complexity-theoretic) {\em pseudorandom generator} (PRG). $$ G:\{0,1\}^{O(\log n)}\rightarrow \{0,1\}^n; $$ (6): There exists no quick HSG $H:k(n)\rightarrow n$ such that $k(n)=O(\log n)$.

A Note on Approximability of Densest At-Least-k-Subgraph

2026-05-25T06:14:39Z

We study the Densest At-Least-$k$-Subgraph (DAL$k$S) problem, in which we are given an undirected graph $G$ and an integer $k$, and the goal is to find a subgraph of $G$ with at least $k$ vertices with maximum density. The best-known algorithm, independently discovered by Khuller and Saha (2009) and by Andersen (2007), yields a 2-approximation for DAL$k$S in polynomial time. In this note, we provide a (simple) reduction from Densest $k$-Subgraph (D$k$S) to Densest At-Least-$k$-Subgraph, which shows that, if D$k$S is hard to approximate to within any constant factor, then DAL$k$S is hard to approximate to within $(3/2 - \varepsilon)$ factor for every $\varepsilon > 0$. This holds in both the normal (non-parameterized) and the parameterized (by $k$) settings. We then generalize the reduction to provide a tight $(2 - \varepsilon)$ factor hardness of approximating Densest At-Least-$k$-Subgraph, albeit under a stronger hypothesis which roughly states that Densest $k$-Subgraph is hard to approximate to within $k^{1 - δ}$ factor for any constant $δ> 0$. Once again, this extends naturally to the parameterized setting. Previously, $(2 - \varepsilon)$ factor inapproximability for DAL$k$S was only known under the Small Set Expansion Hypothesis (Bergner, 2013; Manurangsi, 2017), which does not apply to the parameterized version of the problem. Furthermore, we show that the exact version of DAL$k$S is W[1]-hard (parameterized by $k$).

Constructibility and the P versus NP problem

2026-05-24T19:13:25Z

The P versus NP problem is addressed in a context of provability and limitations on the possibility of finding sound axioms for formal theories. It is shown that if the term "constructible theory" is defined in a way which satisfies certain natural conditions, then no constructible, arithmetically sound and formalizable theory proves P = NP.

A computational phase transition for learning-to-sample from Ising models

2026-05-23T22:04:30Z

We study \emph{learning-to-sample} -- a basic algorithmic task underlying generative modeling -- for Ising models, a standard testbed for algorithmic ideas in both theoretical computer science and machine learning. Given i.i.d. samples of an unknown target distribution, the goal of learning-to-sample is to learn a computationally efficient generation procedure that produces new samples following approximately the same distribution. We construct a family of Ising models of constantly bounded-width which lie just beyond the spectral threshold $λ_{\max}(J)-λ_{\min}(J)=1$, and show that learning-to-sample for this family is computationally hard under standard cryptographic assumptions, even when the learner is given both polynomially many i.i.d. samples from the model and explicit access to its parameters. Combined with results of [AJKPV24,KLV25] showing tractability of learning-to-sample below the spectral threshold, this establishes a sharp computational phase transition at the spectral threshold. Moreover, combined with prior results on parameter learning for bounded-width Ising models [KM17,WSD19,VML20], this shows that learning-to-sample can be more difficult than parameter learning. Finally, we show that any efficient learner for these hard instances exhibits a natural memorization-hallucination dichotomy: the learner must either output configurations that, after a simple transformation, match the (transformed) training data or place substantial mass on configurations of negligible probability under the target distribution.

Fixed Parameter Tractable Linearizability Monitoring

2026-05-23T15:55:12Z

We study the linearizability monitoring problem, which asks whether a given concurrent history of a data structure is equivalent to some sequential execution of the same data structure. In general, this problem is $\textsf{NP}$-hard, even for simple objects such as registers. Recent work has identified tractable cases for restricted classes of histories, notably unambiguous and differentiated histories. We revisit the tractability boundary from a fine-grained, parameterized perspective. We show that for a broad class of data structures -- including stacks, queues, priority queues, and maps -- linearizability monitoring is fixed-parameter tractable when parameterized by the number of processes. Concretely, we give an algorithm running in time $O(c^{k} \cdot \textsf{poly}(n))$, where $n$ is the history size, $k$ is the number of processes, and $c$ is a constant, yielding efficient performance when $k$ is small. Our approach reduces linearizability monitoring to a language reachability problem on graphs, which asks whether a labeled graph admits a path whose label sequence belongs to a fixed language $L$. We identify classes of languages that capture the sequential specifications of the above data structures and show that language reachability is efficiently solvable on the graph structures induced by concurrent histories. Our results complement prior hardness results and existing tractable subclasses, and provide a unified algorithmic framework. We implement our approach and demonstrate significant runtime improvements over existing algorithms, which exhibit exponential worst-case behavior.

The complexity of frugal digraph homomorphisms

2026-05-22T22:21:00Z

For an integer $t \geq 1$, a homomorphism of a digraph G to a digraph $H$ is $t$-frugal if no more than $t$ in-neighbours of any vertex of $G$ have the same image. There is a dichotomy theorem based on structural properties when $t=1$ and $H$ has a loop at each vertex, but there is unlikely to be such a theorem for general digraphs $H$. For $t \geq 2$ we describe a structural dichotomy theorem for $t$-frugal homomorphisms of general digraphs.

Separations above TFNP from Sherali-Adams Lower Bounds

2026-05-22T21:58:20Z

Unlike in TFNP, for which there is an abundance of problems capturing natural existence principles which are incomparable (in the black-box setting), Kleinberg et al. [KKMP21] observed that many of the natural problems considered so far in the second level of the total function polynomial hierarchy (TF$Σ_2$) reduce to the Strong Avoid problem. In this work, we prove that the Linear Ordering Principle does not reduce to Strong Avoid in the black-box setting, exhibiting the first TF$Σ_2$ problem that lies outside of the class of problems reducible to Strong Avoid. The proof of our separation exploits a connection between total search problems in the polynomial hierarchy and proof complexity, recently developed by Fleming, Imrek, and Marciot [FIM25]. In particular, this implies that to show our separation, it suffices to show that there is no small proof of the Linear Ordering Principle in a $Σ_2$-variant of the Sherali-Adams proof system. To do so, we extend the classical pseudo-expectation method to the $Σ_2$ setting, showing that the existence of a $Σ_2$ pseudo-expectation precludes a $Σ_2$ Sherali-Adams proof. The main technical challenge is in proving the existence of such a pseudo-expectation, we manage to do so by solving a combinatorial covering problem about permutations. We also show that the extended pseudo-expectation bound implies that the Linear Ordering Principle cannot be reduced to any problem admitting a low-degree Sherali-Adams refutation.

A Parameterized Algorithm for Testing whether the Limit of a Diagram is Empty

2026-05-22T21:32:24Z

A limit of a (small) diagram $d : J \to E$ in a complete category $E$ can be thought of as specifying a set of equations involving the objects of $E$. To motivate this intuitively, one can think of each object $d(j)$ as a "variable" and each morphism in $J$ as a "constraint" connecting these variables. If $E$ has an initial object, a natural question arises: does our set of equations have any solution at all? Equivalently, we can ask: is the limit of $d$ initial? In this paper we consider the computational problem that, given finite diagram $d$ in a finitely complete category $E$, asks whether its limit is empty. We construct a fast algorithm (in the sense of parameterized complexity theory) that solves this problem when $E$ is of the form $\mathbf{FinSet}^{J}$ for a finite category $J$ and $d$ is a structured co-decomposition, i.e. a diagram arising from the opposite of the Grothendieck construction of a simple graph.

Recursion and proof theoretical characterizations of small circuit classes with modulo counting via discrete differential equations (long version)

2026-05-22T16:06:37Z

The paper proposes an implicit (i.e., machine-independent) complexity approach to studying computation by polynomial-size, constant-depth circuits with gates counting modulo a constant through the lens of discrete ordinary differential equations (ODEs). So far, recursion-theoretic characterizations have been provided for functions computed by circuits of constant depth, including gates counting modulo 2 and 6 only (i.e., for the classes FAC0[2] and FAC0[6], resp.). In this paper, it is shown that considering ODE schemas, rather than bounded recursion, allows for a more fine-grained analysis, leading to (uniform) characterizations for all classes FAC0[n] (n \in N), i.e. functions computed by circuits including counting modulo n gates. Inspired by the syntactic form of the ODE schemas, we go further in this direction and present first-order bounded theories for capturing provably total functions in each of these classes.

Probabilistically checkable proofs for the Existential Theory of the Reals

2026-05-22T11:31:18Z

We prove a PCP theorem for the existential theory of the reals, showing that MAX-ETR-INV is $\exists\mathbb{R}$-hard to approximate to within some constant factor. The existential theory of the reals (ETR) is a decision problem asking if there exists a set of real-valued variables satisfying some constraints involving polynomials and inequalities, and $\exists\mathbb{R}$ is the complexity class of problems polynomial-time reducible to ETR. Many important geometric problems are known to be $\exists\mathbb{R}$-complete. $\exists\mathbb{R}$-hardness results frequently work by a reduction from the $\exists\mathbb{R}$-complete problem ETR-INV, which asks if there is a an assignment of real variables each in the interval $[\frac12, 2]$ satisfying some constraints of form $x=1$, $xy=1$ and $x+y=z$. MAX-ETR-INV is a related optimization problem that asks, given a set of constraints of form $x=1$, $xy=1$, and $x+y=z$, for a feasible (that is, satisfiable with variables in $[\frac12, 2]$) subset of those constraints of the largest possible size. We show that there is some constant $ε>0$ such that it is $\exists\mathbb{R}$-hard to approximate MAX-ETR-INV better than a $1-ε$ factor. This means that even a non-deterministic polynomial-time algorithm can't approximate MAX-ETR-INV better than this factor unless $\exists\mathbb{R}=\text{NP}$. We also give a polynomial-time $8$-factor approximation algorithm and a non-deterministic-polynomial-time $2$-factor approximation algorithm for MAX-ETR-INV.

Epistemic Skills: Reasoning about Knowledge and Oblivion

2026-05-22T08:50:42Z

This paper presents a class of epistemic logics that captures the dynamics of acquiring knowledge and descending into oblivion, while incorporating concepts of group knowledge. The approach is grounded in a system of weighted models, introducing an ``epistemic skills'' metric to represent the epistemic capacities tied to knowledge updates. Within this framework, knowledge acquisition is modeled as a process of upskilling, whereas oblivion is represented as a consequence of downskilling. The framework further enables exploration of ``knowability'' and ``forgettability,'' defined as the potential to gain knowledge through upskilling and to lapse into oblivion through downskilling, respectively. Additionally, it supports a detailed analysis of the distinctions between epistemic de re and de dicto expressions. The computational complexity of the model checking and satisfiability problems is examined, offering insights into their theoretical foundations and practical implications.

On the Approximate Non-Deterministic Degree of Total Boolean Functions

2026-05-22T07:52:09Z

The approximate non-deterministic degree of a Boolean function $f$, denoted $\mathsf{ndeg}_ε(f)$ (written $\mathsf{N}_ε(f)$ for brevity), is the minimum degree of a real polynomial $p$ such that $0 \le |p(x)| \le ε$ whenever $f(x) = 0$, and $|p(x)| \ge 1$ whenever $f(x) = 1$. Unlike exact non-deterministic degree, which only requires the polynomial to be nonzero on $1$-inputs, this measure enforces a uniform gap: the polynomial must stay close to zero on all $0$-inputs and bounded away from zero on all $1$-inputs. The rational degree conjecture, open for over three decades, was recently resolved by Kothari, Kovacs-Deak, Wang, and Yang, who showed that for every total Boolean function $f$, \[ deg(f) \le \widetilde O\!\left(\operatorname{rdeg}(f)^3\right). \] In their paper, they explicitly propose a stronger conjecture: that approximate degree is polynomially bounded by $\mathsf{N}_ε(f)$ and $\mathsf{N}_ε(\overline{f})$ jointly, i.e., for every total Boolean function $f$ and every constant $0<ε<1$, \[ \widetilde{deg}(f) \le \operatorname{poly}(\mathsf N_ε(f), \mathsf N_ε(\overline f)). \] This conjecture, if true, would imply a polynomial version of the rational degree result and bring us closer to resolving de Wolf's longstanding non-deterministic degree conjecture. In this work, we make the first systematic progress on this problem, establishing the conjecture for several broad and natural function classes: monotone and unate functions, functions of bounded alternation number, symmetric functions, $k$-uniform hypergraph properties, and read-$k$ Disjunctive Normal Form (DNF) formulas.