https://arxiv.org/api/U8Tbq0qyxqG6rBSjpe2gQj2Iz8g 2026-06-21T18:31:31Z 12967 705 15 http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.18987v1 One Color Makes All the Difference in the Tractability of Partial Coloring in Semi-Streaming 2026-02-22T00:19:03Z This paper investigates the semi-streaming complexity of \textit{$k$-partial coloring}, a generalization of proper graph coloring. For $k \geq 1$, a $k$-partial coloring requires that each vertex $v$ in an $n$-node graph is assigned a color such that at least $\min\{k, °(v)\}$ of its neighbors are assigned colors different from its own. This framework naturally extends classical coloring problems: specifically, $k$-partial $(k+1)$-coloring and $k$-partial $k$-coloring generalize $(Δ+1)$-proper coloring and $Δ$-proper coloring, respectively. Prior works of Assadi, Chen, and Khanna [SODA~2019] and Assadi, Kumar, and Mittal [TheoretiCS~2023] show that both $(Δ+1)$-proper coloring and $Δ$-proper coloring admit one-pass randomized semi-streaming algorithms. We explore whether these efficiency gains extend to their partial coloring generalizations and reveal a sharp computational threshold : while $k$-partial $(k+1)$-coloring admits a one-pass randomized semi-streaming algorithm, the $k$-partial $k$-coloring remains semi-streaming intractable, effectively demonstrating a ``dichotomy of one color'' in the streaming model. 2026-02-22T00:19:03Z Avinandan Das http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.03801v2 HNN extensions of free groups with equal associated subgroups of finite index: polynomial time word problem 2026-02-21T23:23:01Z Let $G=F\ast_\varphi t$ be an HNN extension of a free group $F$ with two equal associated normal subgroups $H_1 = H_2$ of finite index. We prove that the word problem in $G$ is decidable in polynomial time. This result extends to the case where the subgroups $H_1=H_2$ are not normal, provided that the isomorphism $\varphi:H_1\to H_2$ satisfies an additional condition described in Section 5. 2025-10-04T12:44:35Z Hanwen Shen Alexander Ushakov http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.16688v2 On the Hardness of Approximation of the Fair k-Center Problem 2026-02-21T14:29:28Z In this work, we study the hardness of approximation of the fair $k$-center problem. In this problem, we are given a set of data points in a metric space that is partitioned into groups and the task is to choose a subset of $k$-data points, called centers, such that a prescribed number of data points from each group are chosen while minimizing the maximum distance from any point to its closest center. Although a polynomial-time $3$-approximation is known for fair $k$-center in general metrics, it has remained open whether this approximation guarantee is tight or could be further improved, especially since the classical unconstrained $k$-center problem admits a polynomial-time factor-$2$ approximation. We resolve this open question by proving that, assuming $\mathsf{P} \neq \mathsf{NP}$, for any $ε>0$, no polynomial-time algorithm can approximate fair $k$-center to $(3-ε)$-factor. Our inapproximability results hold even when only two disjoint groups are present and at least one center must be chosen from each group. Further, it extends to the canonical one-per-group setting with $k$-groups (for arbitrary $k$), where exactly one center must be selected from each group. Consequently, the factor-$3$ barrier for fair $k$-center in general metric spaces is inherent, and existing $3$-approximation algorithms are optimal up to lower-order terms even in these restricted regimes. This result stands in sharp contrast to the $k$-supplier formulation, where both the unconstrained and fair variants admit factor-$3$ approximation in polynomial time. 2026-02-18T18:33:27Z Suhas Thejaswi http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.18774v1 Computational Complexity of Edge Coverage Problem for Constrained Control Flow Graphs 2026-02-21T09:51:51Z The article studies edge coverage for control flow graphs extended with explicit constraints. Achieving a given level of white-box coverage for a given code is a classic problem in software testing. We focus on designing test sets that achieve edge coverage \textit{while respecting additional constraints} between vertices. The paper analyzes how such constraints affect both the feasibility and computational complexity of edge coverage. The paper discusses five types of constraints. POSITIVE constraints require at least one test path where a given vertex precedes another. NEGATIVE constraints forbid any such test path. ONCE constraints require exactly one test path with a single occurrence of one vertex before another. MAX ONCE constraints allow such precedence in at most one test path. ALWAYS constraints require every test path containing a given vertex to also contain another vertex later on the same path. Each type models a different test requirement, such as mandatory flows, semantic exclusions, or execution cost limits. We investigate the computational complexity of finding a test set that achieves edge coverage and respects a given set of constraints. For POSITIVE constraints, the existence of an edge covering test set is decidable in polynomial time by extending standard edge coverage constructions with additional paths for each constraint. For NEGATIVE, MAX ONCE, ONCE, and ALWAYS constraints, the decision problem is NP-complete. The proofs rely on polynomial reductions from variants of SAT. The NP-completeness results hold even for restricted graph classes, including acyclic graphs, for all these four constraints. Finally, we study the fixed-parameter tractability of the NEGATIVE constraint. Although the general problem is NP-complete, the paper presents an FPT algorithm with respect to the number of constraints. 2026-02-21T09:51:51Z Jakub Ruszil Artur Polański Adam Roman Jakub Zelek http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.18380v1 The Complexity of Sparse Win-Lose Bimatrix Games 2026-02-20T17:40:50Z We prove that computing an $ε$-approximate Nash equilibrium of a win-lose bimatrix game with constant sparsity is PPAD-hard for inverse-polynomial $ε$. Our result holds for 3-sparse games, which is tight given that 2-sparse win-lose bimatrix games can be solved in polynomial time. 2026-02-20T17:40:50Z 43 pages Eleni Batziou John Fearnley Abheek Ghosh Rahul Savani http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.18240v1 Complexity lower bounds for succinct binary structures of bounded clique-width with restrictions 2026-02-20T14:25:28Z We present a Rice-like complexity lower bound for any MSO-definable problem on binary structures succinctly encoded by circuits. This work extends the framework recently developed as a counterpoint to Courcelle's theorem for graphs encoded by circuits, in two interplaying directions: (1) by allowing multiple binary relations, and (2) by restricting the interpretation of new symbols. Depending on the pair of an MSO problem $ψ$ and an MSO restriction $χ$, the problem is proven to be NP-hard or coNP-hard or P-hard, as long as $ψ$ is non-trivial on structures satisfying $χ$ with bounded clique-width. Indeed, there are P-complete problems (for logspace reductions) in our extended context. Finally, we strengthen a previous result on the necessity to parameterize the notion of non-triviality, hence supporting the choice of clique-width. 2026-02-20T14:25:28Z Colin Geniet Aliénor Goubault-Larrecq Kévin Perrot http://arxiv.org/abs/2411.14821v2 Ex-post Stability under Two-Sided Matching: Complexity and Characterization 2026-02-20T13:46:04Z A probabilistic approach to the stable matching problem has been identified as an important research area with several important open problems. When considering random matchings, ex-post stability is a fundamental stability concept. A prominent open problem is characterizing ex-post stability and establishing its computational complexity. We investigate the computational complexity of testing ex-post stability. Our central result is that when either side has ties in the preferences/priorities, testing ex-post stability is NP-complete. The result even holds if both sides have dichotomous preferences. On the positive side, we give an algorithm using an integer programming approach, that can determine a decomposition with a maximum probability of being weakly stable. We also consider stronger versions of ex-post stability (in particular robust ex-post stability and ex-post strong stability) and prove that they can be tested in polynomial time. 2024-11-22T09:30:20Z Haris Aziz Gergely Csáji Péter Biró http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.08098v2 Neighborhood-Aware Graph Labeling Problem 2026-02-20T12:33:49Z Motivated by optimization oracles in bandits with network interference, we study the Neighborhood-Aware Graph Labeling (NAGL) problem. Given a graph $G = (V,E)$, a label set of size $L$, and local reward functions $f_v$ accessed via evaluation oracles, the objective is to assign labels to maximize $\sum_{v \in V} f_v(x_{N[v]})$, where each term depends on the closed neighborhood of $v$. Two vertices co-occur in some neighborhood term exactly when their distance in $G$ is at most $2$, so the dependency graph is the squared graph $G^2$ and $\mathrm{tw}(G^2)$ governs exact algorithms and matching fine-grained lower bounds. Accordingly, we show that this dependence is inherent: NAGL is NP-hard even on star graphs with binary labels and, assuming SETH, admits no $(L-\varepsilon)^{\mathrm{tw}(G^2)}\cdot n^{O(1)}$-time algorithm for any $\varepsilon>0$. We match this with an exact dynamic program on a tree decomposition of $G^2$ running in $O\!\left(n\cdot \mathrm{tw}(G^2)\cdot L^{\mathrm{tw}(G^2)+1}\right)$ time. For approximation, unless $\mathsf{P}=\mathsf{NP}$, for every $\varepsilon>0$ there is no polynomial-time $n^{1-\varepsilon}$-approximation on general graphs even under the promise $\mathrm{OPT}>0$; without the promise $\mathrm{OPT}>0$, no finite multiplicative approximation ratio is possible. In the nonnegative-reward regime, we give polynomial-time approximation algorithms for NAGL in two settings: (i) given a proper $q$-coloring of $G^2$, we obtain a $1/q$-approximation; and (ii) on planar graphs of bounded maximum degree, we develop a Baker-type polynomial-time approximation scheme (PTAS), which becomes an efficient PTAS (EPTAS) when $L$ is constant. 2026-02-08T19:36:00Z Mohammad Shahverdikondori Sepehr Elahi Patrick Thiran Negar Kiyavash http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.18160v1 Unifying Formal Explanations: A Complexity-Theoretic Perspective 2026-02-20T11:52:26Z Previous work has explored the computational complexity of deriving two fundamental types of explanations for ML model predictions: (1) *sufficient reasons*, which are subsets of input features that, when fixed, determine a prediction, and (2) *contrastive reasons*, which are subsets of input features that, when modified, alter a prediction. Prior studies have examined these explanations in different contexts, such as non-probabilistic versus probabilistic frameworks and local versus global settings. In this study, we introduce a unified framework for analyzing these explanations, demonstrating that they can all be characterized through the minimization of a unified probabilistic value function. We then prove that the complexity of these computations is influenced by three key properties of the value function: (1) *monotonicity*, (2) *submodularity*, and (3) *supermodularity* - which are three fundamental properties in *combinatorial optimization*. Our findings uncover some counterintuitive results regarding the nature of these properties within the explanation settings examined. For instance, although the *local* value functions do not exhibit monotonicity or submodularity/supermodularity whatsoever, we demonstrate that the *global* value functions do possess these properties. This distinction enables us to prove a series of novel polynomial-time results for computing various explanations with provable guarantees in the global explainability setting, across a range of ML models that span the interpretability spectrum, such as neural networks, decision trees, and tree ensembles. In contrast, we show that even highly simplified versions of these explanations become NP-hard to compute in the corresponding local explainability setting. 2026-02-20T11:52:26Z To appear in ICLR 2026 Shahaf Bassan Xuanxiang Huang Guy Katz http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.09859v2 Colouring Graphs Without a Subdivided H-Graph: A Full Complexity Classification 2026-02-20T09:47:29Z We consider Colouring on graphs that are $H$-subgraph-free for some fixed graph $H$, which are graphs that do not contain $H$ as a subgraph. To classify the complexity of Colouring on $H$-subgraph-free graphs for connected $H$, it remains to consider when $H$ is a tree of maximum degree $4$ with exactly one vertex of degree $4$, or a tree of maximum degree $3$ with at least two vertices of degree $3$. We let $H$ be a so-called subdivided ``H''-graph, which is either a subdivided $\mathbb{H}_0$: a tree of maximum degree $4$ that is a star, or a subdivided $\mathbb{H}_1$: a tree of maximum degree $3$ with exactly two vertices of degree $3$. We develop new decomposition theorems resulting in polynomial-time algorithms, and in combination with known results, fully classify all cases $\mathbb{H}_0$ and $\mathbb{H}_1$. To illustrate the wider applicability of our techniques, we also employ them to obtain similar new polynomial-time results for two other classic graph problems: Stable Cut and, in part, Feedback Vertex Set. 2025-12-10T17:47:53Z Tala Eagling-Vose Jorik Jooken Felicia Lucke Barnaby Martin Daniël Paulusma http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.18003v1 Policy Gradient Algorithms in Average-Reward Multichain MDPs 2026-02-20T05:32:29Z While there is an extensive body of research analyzing policy gradient methods for discounted cumulative-reward MDPs, prior work on policy gradient methods for average-reward MDPs has been limited, with most existing results restricted to ergodic or unichain settings. In this work, we first establish a policy gradient theorem for average-reward multichain MDPs based on the invariance of the classification of recurrent and transient states. Building on this foundation, we develop refined analyses and obtain a collection of convergence and sample-complexity results that advance the understanding of this setting. In particular, we show that the proposed $α$-clipped policy mirror ascent algorithm attains an $ε$-optimal policy with respect to positive policies. 2026-02-20T05:32:29Z arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:2510.18340 Jongmin Lee Ernest K. Ryu http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.17942v1 Convergent Gate Elimination and Constructive Circuit Lower Bounds 2026-02-20T02:23:59Z Towards better understanding of gate elimination, the only method known that can prove complexity lower bounds for explicit functions against unrestricted Boolean circuits, this work contributes: (1) formalizing circuit simplifications as a convergent term graph rewriting system and (2) giving a simple and constructive proof of a classical lower bound using this system. First, we show that circuit simplification is a convergent term graph rewriting system over the DeMorgan and $\{\land, \lor, \oplus\}$ bases. We define local rewriting rules from Boolean identities such that every simplification sequence yields an identical final result (up to circuit isomorphism or bisimulation). Convergence enables rigorous reasoning about structural properties of simplified circuits without dependence on the order of simplification. Then, we show that there is \emph{no similar} convergent formalization of circuit simplification over the $U_2$ and $B_2$ bases. Then, we use our simplification system to give a constructive circuit lower bound, generalizing Schnorr's classical result that the XOR function requires $3(n - 1)$ gates to compute in the DeMorgan basis. A constructive lower bound $f \not\in C$ gives an algorithm (called a "refuter") that efficiently finds counter-examples for every $C$-circuit trying to compute the function $f$. Chen, Jin, Santhanam, and Williams showed that constructivity plays a central role in many longstanding open problems about complexity theory (FOCS 2021), so it is natural to ask for constructive circuit lower bounds from gate elimination arguments. This demonstrates how using convergent simplification can lead to shorter and more modular proofs of circuit lower bounds. Furthermore, until this work, no constructive lower bound had been proved via gate elimination. 2026-02-20T02:23:59Z Marco Carmosino Ngu Dang Tim Jackman http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.17904v1 Hilbert's Nullstellensatz is in the Counting Hierarchy 2026-02-20T00:01:49Z We show that Hilbert's Nullstellensatz, the problem of deciding if a system of multivariate polynomial equations has a solution in the algebraic closure of the underlying field, lies in the counting hierarchy. More generally, we show that the number of solutions to a system of equations can be computed in polynomial time with oracle access to the counting hierarchy. Our results hold in particular for polynomials with coefficients in either the rational numbers or a finite field. Previously, the best-known bounds on the complexities of these problems were PSPACE and FPSPACE, respectively. Our main technical contribution is the construction of a uniform family of constant-depth arithmetic circuits that compute the multivariate resultant. 2026-02-20T00:01:49Z Robert Andrews Abhibhav Garg Éric Schost http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.00162v2 End Cover for Initial Value Problem: Complete Validated Algorithms with Complexity Analysis 2026-02-19T21:22:47Z We consider the first-order autonomous ordinary differential equation \[ \mathbf{x}' = \mathbf{f}(\mathbf{x}), \] where $\mathbf{f} : \mathbb{R}^n \to \mathbb{R}^n$ is locally Lipschitz. For a box $B_0 \subseteq \mathbb{R}^n$ and $h > 0$, we denote by $\mathrm{IVP}_{\mathbf{f}}(B_0,h)$ the set of solutions $\mathbf{x} : [0,h] \to \mathbb{R}^n$ satisfying \[ \mathbf{x}'(t) = \mathbf{f}(\mathbf{x}(t)), \qquad \mathbf{x}(0) \in B_0 . \] We present a complete validated algorithm for the following \emph{End Cover Problem}: given $(\mathbf{f}, B_0, \varepsilon, h)$, compute a finite set $\mathcal{C}$ of boxes such that \[ \mathrm{End}_{\mathbf{f}}(B_0,h) \;\subseteq\; \bigcup_{B \in \mathcal{C}} B \;\subseteq\; \mathrm{End}_{\mathbf{f}}(B_0,h) \oplus [-\varepsilon,\varepsilon]^n , \] where \[ \mathrm{End}_{\mathbf{f}}(B_0,h) = \left\{ \mathbf{x}(h) : \mathbf{x} \in \mathrm{IVP}_{\mathbf{f}}(B_0,h) \right\}. \] Moreover, we provide a complexity analysis of our algorithm and introduce a novel technique for computing the end cover $\mathcal{C}$ based on covering the boundary of $\mathrm{End}_{\mathbf{f}}(B_0,h)$. Finally, we present experimental results demonstrating the practicality of our approach. 2026-01-29T21:05:55Z Bingwei Zhang Chee Yap http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.17647v1 Pseudo-deterministic Quantum Algorithms 2026-02-19T18:54:47Z We initiate a systematic study of pseudo-deterministic quantum algorithms. These are quantum algorithms that, for any input, output a canonical solution with high probability. Focusing on the query complexity model, our main contributions include the following complexity separations, which require new lower bound techniques specifically tailored to pseudo-determinism: - We exhibit a problem, Avoid One Encrypted String (AOES), whose classical randomized query complexity is $O(1)$ but is maximally hard for pseudo-deterministic quantum algorithms ($Ω(N)$ query complexity). - We exhibit a problem, Quantum-Locked Estimation (QL-Estimation), for which pseudo-deterministic quantum algorithms admit an exponential speed-up over classical pseudo-deterministic algorithms ($O(\log(N))$ vs. $Θ(\sqrt{N})$), while the randomized query complexity is $O(1)$. Complementing these separations, we show that for any total problem $R$, pseudo-deterministic quantum algorithms admit at most a quintic advantage over deterministic algorithms, i.e., $D(R) = \tilde O(psQ(R)^5)$. On the algorithmic side, we identify a class of quantum search problems that can be made pseudo-deterministic with small overhead, including Grover search, element distinctness, triangle finding, $k$-sum, and graph collision. 2026-02-19T18:54:47Z Hugo Aaronson Tom Gur Jiawei Li