https://arxiv.org/api/6rLM0Os9NtLfrKmcUmWRiE1OSYs2026-06-21T13:45:59Z1296764515http://arxiv.org/abs/cs/0507027v5Anyone but Him: The Complexity of Precluding an Alternative2026-03-04T05:22:50ZPreference aggregation in a multiagent setting is a central issue in both human and computer contexts. In this paper, we study in terms of complexity the vulnerability of preference aggregation to destructive control. That is, we study the ability of an election's chair to, through such mechanisms as voter/candidate addition/suppression/partition, ensure that a particular candidate (equivalently, alternative) does not win. And we study the extent to which election systems can make it impossible, or computationally costly (NP-complete), for the chair to execute such control. Among the systems we study--plurality, Condorcet, and approval voting--we find cases where systems immune or computationally resistant to a chair choosing the winner nonetheless are vulnerable to the chair blocking a victory. Beyond that, we see that among our studied systems no one system offers the best protection against destructive control. Rather, the choice of a preference aggregation system will depend closely on which types of control one wishes to be protected against. We also find concrete cases where the complexity of or susceptibility to control varies dramatically based on the choice among natural tie-handling rules.2005-07-09T18:20:00ZThis revision--the March 2026 Version 5--is identical to the March 2006 Version 4 except in providing, as Appendix A, a correction to the second half of the proof of Theorem 4.21 as it appears in both Version 4 and the AIJ journal version; this proof also replaces the analogous proof part of Theorem 6 of the AAAI versionEdith HemaspaandraLane A. HemaspaandraJoerg Rothehttp://arxiv.org/abs/2603.03717v1When Relaxation Does Not Help: RLDCs with Small Soundness Yield LDCs2026-03-04T04:40:08ZLocally decodable codes (LDCs) are error correction codes that allow recovery of any single message symbol by probing only a small number of positions from the (possibly corrupted) codeword. Relaxed locally decodable codes (RLDCs) further allow the decoder to output a special failure symbol $\bot$ on a corrupted codeword. While known constructions of RLDCs achieve much better parameters than standard LDCs, it is intriguing to understand the relationship between LDCs and RLDCs. Separation results (i.e., the existence of $q$-query RLDCs that are not $q$-query LDCs) are known for $q=3$ (Gur, Minzer, Weissenberg, and Zheng, arXiv:2512.12960, 2025) and $q \geq 15$ (Grigorescu, Kumar, Manohar, and Mon, arXiv:2511.02633, 2025), while any $2$-query RLDC also gives a $2$-query LDC (Block, Blocki, Cheng, Grigorescu, Li, Zheng, and Zhu, CCC 2023).
In this work, we generalize and strengthen the main result in Grigorescu, Kumar, Manohar, and Mon (arXiv:2511.02633, 2025), by removing the requirement of linear codes. Specifically, we show that any $q$-query RLDC with soundness error below some threshold $s(q)$ also yields a $q$-query LDC with comparable parameters. This holds even if the RLDC has imperfect completeness but with a non-adaptive decoder. Our results also extend to the setting of locally correctable codes (LCCs) and relaxed locally correctable codes (RLCCs). Using our results, we further derive improved lower bounds for arbitrary RLDCs and RLCCs, as well as probabilistically checkable proofs of proximity (PCPPs).2026-03-04T04:40:08ZKuan ChengXin LiSongtao Maohttp://arxiv.org/abs/2602.19477v3Embedding arbitrary Boolean circuits into fungal automata with arbitrary update sequences2026-03-04T02:02:33ZThe sandpile automata of Bak, Tang, and Wiesenfeld (Phys. Rev. Lett., 1987) are a simple model for the diffusion of particles in space. A fundamental problem related to the complexity of the model is predicting its evolution in the parallel setting. Despite decades of effort, a classification of this problem for two-dimensional sandpile automata remains outstanding. Fungal automata were recently proposed by Goles et al. (Phys. Lett. A, 2020) as a spin-off of the model in which diffusion occurs either in horizontal $(H)$ or vertical $(V)$ directions according to a so-called update scheme. Goles et al. proved that the prediction problem for this model with the update scheme $H^4V^4$ is $\textbf{P}$-complete. This result was subsequently improved by Modanese and Worsch (Algorithmica, 2024), who showed the problem is $\textbf{P}$-complete also for the simpler updatenscheme $HV$. In this work, we fill in the gaps and prove that the prediction problem is $\textbf{P}$-complete for any update scheme that contains both $H$ and $V$ at least once.2026-02-23T03:40:29ZEric GolesAugusto ModaneseMartín Ríos-WilsonDomingo Ruiz-TalaThomas Worschhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2603.03488v1Planar Graph Orientation Frameworks, Applied to KPlumber and Polyomino Tiling2026-03-03T20:03:52ZGiven a graph, when can we orient the edges to satisfy local constraints at the vertices, where each vertex specifies which local orientations of its incident edges are allowed? This family of graph orientation problems is a special kind of SAT problem, where each variable (edge orientation) appears in exactly two clauses (vertex constraints) -- once positively and once negatively. We analyze the complexity of many natural vertex types (patterns of allowed vertex neighborhoods), most notably all sets of symmetric vertex types which depend on only the number of incoming edges. In many scenarios, including Planar and Non-Planar Symmetric Graph Orientation with constants, we give a full dichotomy characterizing P vs. NP-complete problem classes. We apply our results to obtain new polynomial-time algorithms, resolving a 20-year-old open problem about KPlumber; to simplify existing NP-hardness proofs for tiling with trominoes; and to prove new NP-completeness results for tiling with tetrominoes.2026-03-03T20:03:52Z33 pages, 27 figures MIT Hardness GroupZachary AbelErik D. DemaineJenny DiomidovaJeffery LiZixiang Zhouhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2603.02594v1Low-Degree Method Fails to Predict Robust Subspace Recovery2026-03-03T04:42:13ZThe low-degree polynomial framework has been highly successful in predicting computational versus statistical gaps for high-dimensional problems in average-case analysis and machine learning. This success has led to the low-degree conjecture, which posits that this method captures the power and limitations of efficient algorithms for a wide class of high-dimensional statistical problems. We identify a natural and basic hypothesis testing problem in $\mathbb{R}^n$ which is polynomial time solvable, but for which the low-degree polynomial method fails to predict its computational tractability even up to degree $k=n^{Ω(1)}$. Moreover, the low-degree moments match exactly up to degree $k=O(\sqrt{\log n/\log\log n})$. Our problem is a special case of the well-studied robust subspace recovery problem. The lower bounds suggest that there is no polynomial time algorithm for this problem. In contrast, we give a simple and robust polynomial time algorithm that solves the problem (and noisy variants of it), leveraging anti-concentration properties of the distribution. Our results suggest that the low-degree method and low-degree moments fail to capture algorithms based on anti-concentration, challenging their universality as a predictor of computational barriers.2026-03-03T04:42:13Z27 pages, 1 figureHe JiaAravindan Vijayaraghavanhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2603.02425v1Matrices with displacement structure: a deterministic approach for linear systems and nullspace bases2026-03-02T22:10:45ZThe fastest known algorithms for dealing with structured matrices, in the sense of the displacement rank measure, are randomized. For handling classical displacement structures, they achieve the complexity bounds $\tilde{O}(α^{ω-1} n)$ for solving linear systems and $\tilde{O}(α^2 n)$ for computing the nullspace. Here $n \times n$ is the size of the square matrix, $α$ is its displacement rank, $ω> 2$ is a feasible exponent for matrix multiplication, and the notation $\tilde{O}(\cdot)$ counts arithmetic operations in the base field while hiding logarithmic factors. These algorithms rely on an adaptation of Strassen's divide and conquer Gaussian elimination to the context of structured matrices. This approach requires the input matrix to have generic rank profile; this constraint is lifted via pre- and post-multiplications by special matrices generated from random coefficients chosen in a sufficiently large subset of the base field.
This work introduces a fast and deterministic approach, which solves both problems within $\tilde{O}(α^{ω-1} (m+n))$ operations in the base field for an arbitrary rectangular $m \times n$ input matrix. We provide explicit algorithms that instantiate this approach for Toeplitz-like, Vandermonde-like, and Cauchy-like structures. The starting point of the approach is to reformulate a structured linear system as a modular equation on univariate polynomials. Then, a description of all solutions to this equation is found in three steps, all using fast and deterministic operations on polynomial matrices. Specifically, one first computes a basis of solutions to a vector M-Padé approximation problem; then one performs linear system solving over the polynomials to isolate away unwanted unknowns and restrict to those that are actually sought; and finally the latter are found by simultaneous M-Padé approximation.2026-03-02T22:10:45Z27 pages, 5 algorithmsSara KhichaneVincent Neigerhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2604.09589v1Complexity of Consistency Testing for the Release-Acquire Semantics2026-03-02T17:18:31ZIn a seminal work, Gibbons and Korach studied the complexity of deciding whether an observed sequence of reads and writes of a multi-threaded program admits a sequentially consistent interleaving. They showed the problem to be NP-hard even under strong syntactic restrictions. More recently, Chakraborty et al. considered the problem for weak memory models and proved that NP-hardness remains even when the number of threads, the number of memory locations, and the value domain are all bounded.
In this paper we revisit the problem for the release-acquire variants of the C11 memory model. Our main positive result is that consistency testing can be done in polynomial-time when each memory location is written by at most one thread (multiple readers are allowed). Notably, this restriction is already NP-hard for sequential consistency. We complement this upper bound with tight hardness results: the problem is NP-hard when two threads may write to the same location, and allowing three writers per location rules out 2^{o(k)}.n^{O(1)} algorithms under the Exponential Time Hypothesis, where k denotes the number of threads, and n the number of memory operations.2026-03-02T17:18:31ZA shorter version has been accepte at FM 2026 - the 27th International Symposium on Formal MethodsR. GovindS. KrishnaSanchari SilB. Srivathsanhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2305.02850v2Impossibility of Depth Reduction in Explainable Clustering2026-03-02T17:08:19ZOver the last few years Explainable Clustering has gathered a lot of attention. Dasgupta et al. [ICML'20] initiated the study of explainable $k$-means and $k$-median clustering problems where the explanation is captured by a threshold decision tree which partitions the space at each node using axis parallel hyperplanes. Recently, Laber et al. [Pattern Recognition'23] made a case to consider the depth of the decision tree as an additional complexity measure of interest.
In this work, we prove that even when the input points are in the Euclidean plane, then any depth reduction in the explanation incurs unbounded loss in the $k$-means and $k$-median cost. Formally, we show that there exists a data set $X\subseteq \mathbb{R}^2$, for which there is a decision tree of depth $k-1$ whose $k$-means/$k$-median cost matches the optimal clustering cost of $X$, but every decision tree of depth less than $k-1$ has unbounded cost w.r.t. the optimal cost of clustering. We extend our results to the $k$-center objective as well, albeit with weaker guarantees.2023-05-04T14:11:40ZChengyuan DengSurya Teja GavvaKarthik C. S.Parth PatelAdarsh Srinivasanhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2603.01929v1A note on Jerabek's paper "A simplified lower bound for implicational logic"2026-03-02T14:45:11ZIn our previous papers we sketched proofs of the equality NP = coNP = PSPACE. These results have been obtained by proof theoretic tree-to-dag compressing techniques adapted to Prawitz's Natural Deduction (ND) for implicational minimal logic with references to Hudelmaier's cutfree sequent calculus. In this note we comment on Jeřábek's approach that claimed to refute our results by providing exponential lower bounds on the implicational minimal logic. This claim is wrong and misleading, which is briefly demonstrated by Basis example below.2026-03-02T14:45:11ZLev GordeevEdward Hermann Haeuslerhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2603.01393v1NP-Completeness and Physical Zero-Knowledge Proof of Hotaru Beam2026-03-02T02:43:54ZHotaru Beam is a logic puzzle which objective is to connect circles placed on a grid by drawing only lines with specified starting points and numbers of bends. A zero-knowledge proof is a communication protocol that allows one player to persuade the other that they are in possession of a certain piece of information without actually revealing it. We show that Hotaru Beam is NP-complete and present a physical zero-knowledge proof (i.e. implementable using physical items) for proving that one knows a solution to the puzzle.2026-03-02T02:43:54ZA preliminary version of this paper was presented at the 30th International Conference on Computing and Combinatorics (COCOON)Taisei OtsujiPeter FullaTakuro Fukunagahttp://arxiv.org/abs/2406.20069v4A Dichotomy for Maximum PCSPs on Graphs2026-03-01T21:29:19ZFix two non-empty loopless graphs $G$ and $H$ such that $G$ maps homomorphically to $H$. The Maximum Promise Constraint Satisfaction Problem parameterised by $G$ and $H$ is the following computational problem, denoted by MaxPCSP($G$, $H$): Given an input (multi)graph $X$ that admits a map to $G$ preserving a $ρ$-fraction of the edges, find a map from $X$ to $H$ that preserves a $ρ$-fraction of the edges. As our main result, we give a complete classification of this problem under Khot's Unique Games Conjecture: The only tractable cases are when $G$ is bipartite and $H$ contains a triangle.
Along the way, we establish several results, including an efficient approximation algorithm for the following problem: Given a (multi)graph $X$ which contains a bipartite subgraph with $ρ$ edges, what is the largest triangle-free subgraph of $X$ that can be found efficiently? We present an SDP-based algorithm that finds one with at least $0.8823 ρ$ edges, thus improving on the subgraph with $0.878 ρ$ edges obtained by the classic Max-Cut algorithm of Goemans and Williamson.2024-06-28T17:27:54ZA new title and more results (a dichotomy for graphs)Tamio-Vesa NakajimaStanislav Živnýhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2603.01244v1Hexasort -- The Complexity of Stacking Colors on Graphs2026-03-01T19:49:09ZMany popular puzzle and matching games have been analyzed through the lens of computational complexity. Prominent examples include Sudoku, Candy Crush, and Flood-It. A common theme among these widely played games is that their generalized decision versions are NP-hard, which is often thought of as a source of their inherent difficulty and addictive appeal to human players. In this paper, we study a popular single-player stacking game commonly known as Hexasort. The game can be modelled as placing colored stacks onto the vertices of a graph, where adjacent stacks of the same color merge and vanish according to deterministic rules. We prove that Hexasort is NP-hard, even when restricted to single-color stacks and progressively more constrained classes of graphs, culminating in strong NP-hardness on trees of either bounded height or degree. Towards fixed-parameter tractable algorithms, we identify settings in which the problem becomes polynomial-time solvable and present dynamic programming algorithms.2026-03-01T19:49:09ZLinus KlockerSimon D. Finkhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2601.15571v4Computational Complexity of Physical Counting2026-03-01T18:59:33ZWe characterize which coordinates of a factored state space determine optimal actions. For $\mathcal{D}=(A,S,U)$ with $S=X_1\times\cdots\times X_n$, coordinate set $I$ is sufficient if $s_I=s'_I\Rightarrow\operatorname{Opt}(s)=\operatorname{Opt}(s')$. The decision quotient $Q=S/{\sim}$ ($s\sim s'\Leftrightarrow\operatorname{Opt}(s)=\operatorname{Opt}(s')$) is the minimal abstraction: any abstraction preserving optimal actions factors uniquely through $Q$.
We prove fourteen first-principles theorems (thirteen from pure mathematics, one empirical). The chain from counting measure to probability to Bayes' theorem to $Q$ follows from finite set cardinality. Fisher information, entropy, optimal transport, rate-distortion, and thermodynamics each independently recover $\mathrm{srank}$ as decision complexity measure. From $\log x\leq x-1$ alone, Bayesian updating uniquely minimizes expected log loss.
Complexity: SUFFICIENCY-CHECK and MINIMUM-SUFFICIENT-SET are coNP-complete; ANCHOR-SUFFICIENCY is $Σ_2^P$-complete; stochastic and sequential variants PP- and PSPACE-complete with strict separation. Six subcases admit polynomial algorithms. Under ETH, succinct encodings carry $2^{Ω(n)}$ lower bounds. Verification requires $\geq 2^{n-1}$ witness pairs.
Two results carry empirical conditions. Conditional on Landauer's principle ($k_BT\ln 2$ per bit erasure; experimentally confirmed 2012), $dU\geqλ\,dC$ follows by composition with bit-operation bounds; rejecting it requires rejecting Landauer. Conditional on stochastic thermodynamics (Barato--Seifert 2015), $\mathrm{Var}(J)/\langle J\rangle^2\geq 2/σ$ bounds decision precision by entropy production, minimal $σ$ scaling with $\mathrm{srank}$.2026-01-22T01:29:10ZAll results are machine-checked in Lean 4 with no `sorry` placeholders. Complexity results carry their hypotheses as explicit Lean theorem parameters. A machine-generated assumption ledger records all conditional dependencies. There are no hidden axioms. 132 pages, Lean 4 artifact: 28863 lines, 1252 theorems/lemmas across 113 files (0 sorry placeholders)Tristan Simashttp://arxiv.org/abs/2603.01171v1PARWiS: Winner determination under shoestring budgets using active pairwise comparisons2026-03-01T16:21:31ZDetermining a winner among a set of items using active pairwise comparisons under a limited budget is a challenging problem in preference-based learning. The goal of this study is to implement and evaluate the PARWiS algorithm, which shows spectral ranking and disruptive pair selection to identify the best item under shoestring budgets. This work have extended the PARWiS with a contextual variant (Contextual PARWiS) and a reinforcement learning-based variant (RL PARWiS), comparing them against baselines, including Double Thompson Sampling and a random selection strategy. This evaluation spans synthetic and real-world datasets (Jester and MovieLens), using budgets of 40, 60, and 80 comparisons for 20 items. The performance is measured through recovery fraction, true rank of reported winner, reported rank of true winner, and cumulative regret, alongside the separation metric \(Δ_{1,2}\). Results show that PARWiS and RL PARWiS outperform baselines across all datasets, particularly in the Jester dataset with a higher \(Δ_{1,2}\), while performance gaps narrow in the more challenging MovieLens dataset with a smaller \(Δ_{1,2}\). Contextual PARWiS shows comparable performance to PARWiS, indicating that contextual features may require further tuning to provide significant benefits.2026-03-01T16:21:31Z12 pagesShailendra Bhandarihttp://arxiv.org/abs/2504.03523v2Undefinability of Approximation of 2-to-2 Games2026-03-01T12:32:49ZRecent work by Atserias and Dawar (J. Log. Comp 2019) and Tucker-Foltz (LMCS 2024) has established undefinability results in fixed-point logic with counting (FPC) corresponding to many classical complexity results from the hardness of approximation. In this line of work, NP-hardness results are turned into unconditional FPC undefinability results. We extend this work by showing the FPC undefinability of any constant factor approximation of weighted 2-to-2 games, based on the NP-hardness results of Khot, Minzer and Safra. Our result shows that the completely satisfiable 2-to-2 games are not FPC-separable from those that are not epsilon-satisfiable, for arbitrarily small epsilon. The perfect completeness of our inseparability is an improvement on the complexity result, as the NP-hardness of such a separation is still only conjectured. This perfect completeness enables us to show the FPC undefinability of other problems whose NP-hardness is conjectured. In particular, we are able to show that no FPC formula can separate the 3-colourable graphs from those that are not t-colourable, for any constant t.2025-04-04T15:20:07Z28 pages. Full version of a paper that appeared in CSL 2025Anuj DawarBálint Molnár