https://arxiv.org/api/i1DZ/0Hvny1T45Ayum1hsrnGgao2026-06-21T12:41:25Z1296763015http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.11267v3Fast polynomial computations with space constraints2026-03-06T15:49:52ZThe works presented in this habilitation concern the algorithmics of polynomials. This is a central topic in computer algebra, with numerous applications both within and outside the field - cryptography, error-correcting codes, etc. For many problems, extremely efficient algorithms have been developed since the 1960s. Here, we are interested in how this efficiency is affected when space constraints are introduced.
The first part focuses on the time-space complexity of fundamental polynomial computations - multiplication, division, interpolation, ... While naive algorithms typically have constant space complexity, fast algorithms generally require linear space. We develop algorithms that are both time- and space-efficient. This leads us to discuss and refine definitions of space complexity for function computation.
In the second part, the space constraints are put on the inputs and outputs. Algorithms for polynomials assume in general a dense representation for the polynomials, that is storing the full list of coefficients. In contrast, we work with sparse polynomials, in which most coefficients vanish. In particular, we describe the first quasi-linear algorithm for sparse interpolation, which plays a role analogous to the Fast Fourier Transform in the sparse settings. We also explore computationally hard problems concerning divisibility and factorization of sparse polynomials.2025-11-14T13:00:49ZDocument presented as the author's habilitation thesisBruno Grenethttp://arxiv.org/abs/2603.06736v1Three Fixed-Dimension Satisfiability Semantics for Quantum Logic: Implications and an Explicit Separator2026-03-06T06:29:45ZWe compare three satisfiability notions for propositional formulas in the language {not, and, or} over a fixed finite-dimensional Hilbert space H=F^d with F in {R, C}. The first is the standard Hilbert-lattice semantics on the subspace lattice L(H), where meet and join are total operations. The second is a global commuting-projector semantics, where all atoms occurring in the formula are interpreted by a single pairwise-commuting projector family. The third is a local partial-Boolean semantics, where binary connectives are defined only on commeasurable pairs and definedness is checked nodewise along the parse tree.
We prove, for every fixed d >= 1, Sat_COM^d(phi) implies Sat_PBA^d(phi) implies Sat_STD^d(phi) for every formula phi. We then exhibit the explicit formula SEP-1 := (p and (q or r)) and not((p and q) or (p and r)) which is satisfiable in the standard semantics for every d >= 2, but unsatisfiable under both the global commuting and the partial-Boolean semantics. Consequently, for every d >= 2, the satisfiability classes satisfy SAT_COM^d subseteq SAT_PBA^d subset SAT_STD^d and SAT_COM^d subset SAT_STD^d, while the exact relation between SAT_COM^d and SAT_PBA^d remains open. The point of the paper is semantic comparison, not a new feasibility reduction or a generic translation theorem.2026-03-06T06:29:45Z11 pages. Discussion on the relationship between global commuting and partial-Boolean semanticsJoaquim Reizi Higuchihttp://arxiv.org/abs/2603.05920v1Classical simulability of quantum circuits followed by sparse classical post-processing2026-03-06T05:18:14ZWe study the classical simulability of a polynomial-size quantum circuit $C_n$ on $n$ qubits followed by sparse classical post-processing (SCP) on $m$ bits, where $m \leq n \leq {\rm poly}(m)$. The SCP is described by a non-zero Boolean function $f_m$ that is classically computable in polynomial time and is sparse, i.e., has a peaked Fourier spectrum. First, we provide a necessary and sufficient condition on $C_n$ such that, for any SCP $f_m$, $C_n$ followed by $f_m$ is classically simulable. This characterization extends the result of Van den Nest and implies that various quantum circuits followed by SCP are classically simulable. Examples include IQP circuits, Clifford Magic circuits, and the quantum part of Simon's algorithm, even though these circuits alone are hard to simulate classically. Then, we consider the case where $C_n$ has constant depth $d$. While it is unlikely that, for any SCP $f_m$, $C_n$ followed by $f_m$ is classically simulable, we show that it is simulable by a polynomial-time probabilistic algorithm with access to commuting quantum circuits on $n+1$ qubits. Each such circuit consists of at most deg($f_m$) commuting gates and each commuting gate acts on at most $2^d+1$ qubits, where deg($f_m$) is the Fourier degree of $f_m$. This provides a better understanding of the hardness of simulating constant-depth quantum circuits followed by SCP.2026-03-06T05:18:14Z20 pages, 3 figuresYasuhiro TakahashiMasayuki MiyamotoNoboru Kunihirohttp://arxiv.org/abs/2410.21569v2Maximum Partial List H-Coloring on P_5-free graphs in polynomial time2026-03-05T18:38:44ZIn this article we show that Maximum Partial List H-Coloring is polynomial-time solvable on P_5-free graphs for every fixed graph H. In particular, this implies that Maximum k-Colorable Subgraph is polynomial-time solvable on P_5-free graphs. This answers an open question from Agrawal, Lima, Lokshtanov, Saurabh & Sharma [SODA 2024]. This also improves the $n^{O(ω(G))}$-time algorithm for Maximum Partial H-Coloring by Chudnovsky, King, Pilipczuk, Rzążewski & Spirkl [SIDMA 2021] to polynomial-time algorithm.2024-10-28T22:05:37ZLemma 1 has been phrased as a subroutine that is used recursively by Lemma 2. The earlier version did not take into account that the recursive use of Lemma 1 alone may not be possible without interleaving it with the algorithm of Lemma 2Daniel LokshtanovPaweł RzążewskiSaket SaurabhRoohani SharmaMeirav Zehavihttp://arxiv.org/abs/2601.09219v2A $4/3$ ratio approximation algorithm for the Tree Augmentation Problem by deferred local-ratio and climbing2026-03-05T15:35:44ZThe \emph{Tree Augmentation Problem (TAP)} is given a tree $T=(V,E_T)$ and additional set of {\em links} $E$ on $V\times V$, find $F \subseteq E$ such that $T \cup F$ is $2$-edge-connected, and $|F|$ is minimum. The problem is APX-hard \cite{r} even in if links are only between leaves \cite{r}. The best known approximation ratio for TAP is $1.393$, due to Traub and Zenklusen~\cite{tr1} J.~ACM,~2025 using the {\em relative greedy} technique \cite{zel}.
\noindent We introduce a new technique called the {\em deferred local ratio technique}. In this technique, the disjointness of the local-ratio primal-dual type does not hold. The technique applies Set Cover problem under certain conditions (see Section \ref{lr}). We use it provide a We use it to provide a $4/3$ approximation algorithm for TAP. It is possible this technique will find future applications.
The running time is The running time is $O(m\cdot\sqrt{n})$ time \cite{vaz}, \cite{vaz1}. Faster than \cite{tr1} \cite{LS}
and LP based algorithms as we do not enumeratestructures of size $exp(Θ(f(1/ε)\cdot \log n)).$ Nor do we scale and round.
\noindent \cite{ed} has an implementation \cite{kol} that is extensively used in the industry.2026-01-14T06:45:24ZFour figuresGuy KortsarzRutgers University, Camdenhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2501.03710v2On complexity of restricted fragments of Decision DNNF2026-03-05T13:40:17ZDecision \textsc{dnnf} (a.k.a. $\wedge_d$-\textsc{fbdd}) is an important special case of Decomposable Negation Normal Form (\textsc{dnnf}), a landmark knowledge compilation model. Like other known \textsc{dnnf} restrictions, Decision \textsc{dnnf} admits \textsc{fpt} sized representation of \textsc{cnf}s of bounded \emph{primal} treewidth. However, unlike other restrictions, the complexity of representation for \textsc{cnf}s of bounded \emph{incidence} treewidth is wide open.
In[arxiv:1708.07767], we resolved this question for two restricted classes of Decision \textsc{dnnf} that we name $\wedge_d$-\textsc{obdd} and Structured Decision \textsc{dnnf}. In particular, we demonstrated that, while both these classes have \textsc{fpt}-sized representations for \textsc{cnf}s of bounded primal treewidth, they need \textsc{xp}-size for representation of \textsc{cnf}s of bounded incidence treewidth.
In the main part of this paper we carry out an in-depth study of the $\wedge_d$-\textsc{obdd} model. We formulate a generic methodology for proving lower bounds for the model. Using this methodology, we reestablish the \textsc{xp} lower bound provided in [arxiv:1708.07767]. We also provide exponential separations between \textsc{fbdd} and $\wedge_d$-\textsc{obdd} and between $\wedge_d$-\textsc{obdd} and an ordinary \textsc{obdd}.
We study the complexity of Apply operation for $\wedge_d$-\textsc{obdd}. While, in general, the Apply operation leads to exponential blow up of the resulting model, we identify a special restricted case where the Apply operation can be carried out efficiently.
We introduce a relaxed version of Structured Decision \textsc{dnnf} that we name Structured $\wedge_d$-\textsc{fbdd} and demonstrate that this model is quite powerful for \textsc{cnf}s of bounded incidence treewidth.2025-01-07T11:31:20ZMain changes: Section 3 has been significantly revised and new section (Section 4) has been addedAndrea CalíIgor Razgonhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2603.05054v1Attacking the Polynomials in the Maze of Finite Fields problem2026-03-05T11:06:48ZIn April 2025 GMV announced a competition for finding the best method to solve a particular polynomial system over a finite field. In this paper we provide a method for solving the given equation system significantly faster than what is possible by brute-force or standard Gröbner basis approaches. The method exploits the structured sparsity of the polynomial system to compute a univariate polynomial in the associated ideal through successive computations of resultants. A solution to the system can then be efficiently recovered from this univariate polynomial. Pseudocode is given for the proposed ResultantSolver algorithm, along with experiments and comparisons to rival methods. We also discuss further potential improvements, such as parallelizing parts of the computations.2026-03-05T11:06:48ZÀngela BarberoRagnar Freij-HollantiCamilla HollantiHåvard RaddumØyvind YtrehusMorten Øygardenhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2602.13046v2Classification of Local Optimization Problems in Directed Cycles2026-03-05T09:29:48ZWe present a complete classification of the distributed computational complexity of local optimization problems in directed cycles for both the deterministic and the randomized LOCAL model. We show that for any local optimization problem $Π$ (that can be of the form min-sum, max-sum, min-max, or max-min, for any local cost or utility function over some finite alphabet), and for any constant approximation ratio $α$, the task of finding an $α$-approximation of $Π$ in directed cycles has one of the following complexities:
1. $O(1)$ rounds in deterministic LOCAL, $O(1)$ rounds in randomized LOCAL,
2. $Θ(\log^* n)$ rounds in deterministic LOCAL, $O(1)$ rounds in randomized LOCAL,
3. $Θ(\log^* n)$ rounds in deterministic LOCAL, $Θ(\log^* n)$ rounds in randomized LOCAL,
4. $Θ(n)$ rounds in deterministic LOCAL, $Θ(n)$ rounds in randomized LOCAL.
Moreover, for any given $Π$ and $α$, we can determine the complexity class automatically, with an efficient (centralized, sequential) meta-algorithm, and we can also efficiently synthesize an asymptotically optimal distributed algorithm.
Before this work, similar results were only known for local search problems (e.g., locally checkable labeling problems). The family of local optimization problems is a strict generalization of local search problems, and it contains numerous commonly studied distributed tasks, such as the problems of finding approximations of the maximum independent set, minimum vertex cover, minimum dominating set, and minimum vertex coloring.2026-02-13T16:03:14Z26 pages, 2 figuresThomas BoudierFabian KuhnAugusto ModaneseRonja StimpertJukka Suomelahttp://arxiv.org/abs/2603.04758v1Quantum Algorithms for Network Signal Coordination2026-03-05T03:14:52ZThere has been increasing interest in developing efficient quantum algorithms for hard classical problems. The Network Signal Coordination (NSC) problem is one such problem known to be NP complete. We implement Grover's search algorithm to solve the NSC problem to provide quadratic speedup. We further extend the algorithm to a Robust NSC formulation and analyse its complexity under both constant and polynomial-precision robustness parameters. The Robust NSC problem determines whether there exists a fraction (alpha) of solutions space that will lead to system delays less than a maximum threshold (K). The key contributions of this work are (1) development of a quantum algorithm for the NSC problem, and (2) a quantum algorithm for the Robust NSC problem whose iteration count is O(1/sqrt(alpha)), independent of the search space size, and (3) an extension to polynomial-precision robustness where alpha = alpha_o/p(N) decays polynomially with network size, retaining a quadratic quantum speedup. We demonstrate its implementation through simulation and on an actual quantum computer.2026-03-05T03:14:52ZVinayak DixitRichard Pechhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2510.07515v3No exponential quantum speedup for $\mathrm{SIS}^\infty$ anymore2026-03-05T02:18:10ZIn 2021, Chen, Liu, and Zhandry presented an efficient quantum algorithm for the average-case $\ell_\infty$-Short Integer Solution ($\mathrm{SIS}^\infty$) problem, in a parameter range outside the normal range of cryptographic interest, but still with no known efficient classical algorithm. This was particularly exciting since $\mathrm{SIS}^\infty$ is a simple problem without structure, and their algorithmic techniques were different from those used in prior exponential quantum speedups.
We present efficient classical algorithms for all of the $\mathrm{SIS}^\infty$ and (more general) Constrained Integer Solution problems studied in their paper, showing there is no exponential quantum speedup anymore.2025-10-08T20:28:47ZRobin KothariRyan O'DonnellKewen Wuhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2603.04255v1Learning Read-Once Determinants and the Principal Minor Assignment Problem2026-03-04T16:42:33ZA symbolic determinant under rank-one restriction computes a polynomial of the form $\det(A_0+A_1y_1+\ldots+A_ny_n)$, where $A_0,A_1,\ldots,A_n$ are square matrices over a field $\mathbb{F}$ and $rank(A_i)=1$ for each $i\in[n]$. This class of polynomials has been studied extensively, since the work of Edmonds (1967), in the context of linear matroids, matching, matrix completion and polynomial identity testing. We study the following learning problem for this class: Given black-box access to an $n$-variate polynomial $f=\det(A_0+A_1y_1+ \ldots+A_ny_n)$, where $A_0,A_1,\ldots,A_n$ are unknown square matrices over $\mathbb{F}$ and rank$(A_i)=1$ for each $i\in[n]$, find a square matrix $B_0$ and rank-one square matrices $B_1,\ldots,B_n$ over $\mathbb{F}$ such that $f=\det(B_0+B_1y_1+\ldots+B_ny_n)$. In this work, we give a randomized poly(n) time algorithm to solve this problem. As the above-mentioned class is known to be equivalent to the class of read-once determinants (RODs), we will refer to the problem as learning RODs. The algorithm for learning RODs is obtained by connecting with a well-known open problem in linear algebra, namely the Principal Minor Assignment Problem (PMAP), which asks to find (if possible) a matrix having prescribed principal minors. PMAP has also been studied in machine learning to learn the kernel matrix of a determinantal point process. Here, we study a natural black-box version of PMAP: Given black-box access to an $n$-variate polynomial $f = \det(A + Y)$, where $A \in \mathbb{F}^{n \times n}$ is unknown and $Y = diag(y_1,\ldots,y_n)$, find a $B\in\mathbb{F}^{n\times n}$ such that $f=det(B+Y)$. We show that black-box PMAP can be solved in randomized poly(n) time, and further, it is randomized polynomial-time equivalent to learning RODs. We resolve black-box PMAP by investigating a property of dense matrices that we call the rank-one extension property.2026-03-04T16:42:33ZAbhiram AravindAbhranil ChatterjeeSumanta GhoshRohit GurjarRoshan RajChandan Sahahttp://arxiv.org/abs/2501.05259v2Reversible Computation with Stacks and "Reversible Management of Failures"2026-03-04T12:52:42ZThis work examines approaches to making computational models reversible. Broadly speaking, transforming a computational model into a reversible one, i.e. reversibilizing it, means extending its operational semantics conservatively in a way that each term of the model is interpretable as a bijection. We recall that the most common strategy to reversibilize a computational model yields operational semantics that halts computations whenever a computational state cannot be uniquely determined from its successor state, thereby allowing terms to be interpreted as partial bijective functions. We are interested in reversible computational models whose terms can be interpreted as total bijective functions. This is essential for studying aspects of computational complexity related to reversible computational models. We introduce SCORE, a language designed for manipulating variables and stacks. Notably, common reversibilization strategies naturally lead to interpreting the functions for stack manipulation as partial bijections. According to our interests, we demonstrate how to interpret SCORE in a state space where, using a proof-assistant, we certify that stack operations are total bijections. It follows that all SCORE terms can be interpreted as total bijections.2025-01-09T14:13:59ZIn Proceedings LTT 2026, arXiv:2603.02912EPTCS 441, 2026, pp. 213-226Matteo PalazzoDip. di Informatica, Universita' di TorinoLuca RoversiDip. di Informatica, Universita' di Torino10.4204/EPTCS.441.13http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.04015v1Truth Predicate of Inductive Definitions and Logical Complexity of Infinite-Descent Proofs2026-03-04T12:51:54ZFormal reasoning about inductively defined relations and structures is widely recognized not only for its mathematical interest but also for its importance in computer science, and has applications in verifying properties of programs and algorithms. Recently, several proof systems of inductively defined predicates based on sequent calculus including the cyclic proof system CLKID-omega and the infinite-descent proof system LKID-omega have attracted much attention. Although the relation among their provabilities has been clarified so far, the logical complexity of these systems has not been much studied. The infinite-descent proof system LKID-omega is an infinite proof system for inductive definitions and allows infinite paths in proof figures. It serves as a basis for the cyclic proof system. This paper shows that the logical complexity of the provability in LKID-omega is (Pi-1-1)-complete. To show this, first it is shown that the validity for inductive definitions in standard models is equivalent to the validity for inductive definitions in standard term models. Next, using this equivalence, this paper extends the truth predicate of omega-languages, as given in Girard's textbook, to inductive definitions by employing arithmetical coding of inductive definitions. This shows that the validity of inductive definitions in standard models is a (Pi-1-1) relation. Then, using the completeness of LKID-omega for standard models, it is shown that the logical complexity of the provability in LKID-omega is (Pi-1-1)-complete.2026-03-04T12:51:54ZIn Proceedings LTT 2026, arXiv:2603.02912EPTCS 441, 2026, pp. 166-184Sohei ItoNagasaki UniversityMakoto TatsutaNational Institute of Informatics / Sokendai10.4204/EPTCS.441.10http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.03841v1Advances in List Decoding of Polynomial Codes2026-03-04T08:45:58ZError-correcting codes are a method for representing data, so that one can recover the original information even if some parts of it were corrupted. The basic idea, which dates back to the revolutionary work of Shannon and Hamming about a century ago, is to encode the data into a redundant form, so that the original information can be decoded from the redundant encoding even in the presence of some noise or corruption. One prominent family of error-correcting codes are Reed-Solomon Codes which encode the data using evaluations of low-degree polynomials. Nearly six decades after they were introduced, Reed-Solomon Codes, as well as some related families of polynomial-based codes, continue to be widely studied, both from a theoretical perspective and from the point of view of applications.
Besides their obvious use in communication, error-correcting codes such as Reed-Solomon Codes are also useful for various applications in theoretical computer science. These applications often require the ability to cope with many errors, much more than what is possible information-theoretically. List-decodable codes are a special class of error-correcting codes that enable correction from more errors than is traditionally possible by allowing a small list of candidate decodings. These codes have turned out to be extremely useful in various applications across theoretical computer science and coding theory.
In recent years, there have been significant advances in list decoding of Reed-Solomon Codes and related families of polynomial-based codes. This includes efficient list decoding of such codes up to the information-theoretic capacity, with optimal list-size, and using fast nearly-linear time, and even sublinear-time, algorithms. In this book, we survey these developments.2026-03-04T08:45:58ZSurvey, comments welcomeMrinal KumarNoga Ron-Zewihttp://arxiv.org/abs/2402.13952v2Aaronson-Ambainis Conjecture Is True For Random Restrictions2026-03-04T06:30:00ZIn an attempt to show that the acceptance probability of a quantum query algorithm making $q$ queries can be well-approximated almost everywhere by a classical decision tree of depth $\leq \text{poly}(q)$, Aaronson and Ambainis proposed the following conjecture: let $f: \{ \pm 1\}^n \rightarrow [0,1]$ be a degree $d$ polynomial with variance $\geq ε$. Then, there exists a coordinate of $f$ with influence $\geq \text{poly} (ε, 1/d)$.
We show that for any polynomial $f: \{ \pm 1\}^n \rightarrow [0,1]$ of degree $d$ $(d \geq 2)$ and variance $\text{Var}[f] \geq 1/d$, if $ρ$ denotes a random restriction with survival probability $\dfrac{\log(d)}{C_1 d}$, $$ \text{Pr} \left[f_ρ \text{ has a coordinate with influence} \geq \dfrac{\text{Var}[f]^2 }{d^{C_2}} \right] \geq \dfrac{\text{Var}[f] \log(d)}{50C_1 d}$$ where $C_1, C_2>0$ are universal constants. Thus, Aaronson-Ambainis conjecture is true for a non-negligible fraction of random restrictions of the given polynomial assuming its variance is not too low.2024-02-21T17:29:34ZAccepted at ITCS 2025Sreejata Kishor Bhattacharya