A note on approximating the average degree of bounded arboricity graphs

2026-03-10T14:34:04Z

Estimating the average degree of graph is a classic problem in sublinear graph algorithm. Eden, Ron, and Seshadhri (ICALP 2017, SIDMA 2019) gave a simple algorithm for this problem whose running time depended on the graph arboricity, but the underlying simplicity and associated analysis were buried inside the main result. Moreover, the description there loses logarithmic factors because of parameter search. The aim of this note is to give a full presentation of this algorithm, without these losses. Consider standard access (vertex samples, degree queries, and neighbor queries) to a graph $G = (V,E)$ of arboricity at most $α$. Let $d$ denote the average degree of $G$. We describe an algorithm that gives a $(1+\varepsilon)$-approximation to $d$ degree using $O(\varepsilon^{-2}α/d)$ queries. For completeness, we modify the algorithm to get a $O(\varepsilon^{-2} \sqrt{n/d})$ query

A Simple Constructive Bound on Circuit Size Change Under Truth Table Perturbation

2026-03-10T08:53:54Z

The observation that optimum circuit size changes by at most $O(n)$ under a one-point truth table perturbation is implicit in prior work on the Minimum Circuit Size Problem. This note states the bound explicitly for arbitrary fixed finite complete bases with unit-cost gates, extends it to general Hamming distance via a telescoping argument, and verifies it exhaustively at $n = 4$ in the AIG basis using SAT-derived exact circuit sizes for 220 of 222 NPN equivalence classes. Among 987 mutation edges, the maximum observed difference is $4 = n$, confirming the bound is tight at $n = 4$ for AIG.

Reinforced Generation of Combinatorial Structures: Hardness of Approximation

2026-03-09T21:00:18Z

Can AI based methods help us make advances in complexity theory? We provide evidence towards answering this in the affirmative, using AlphaEvolve (an LLM code mutation agent) to obtain new results in three settings: a) We improve a recent result of Kunisky and Yu to obtain near-optimal upper and (conditional) lower bounds on certification algorithms for MAX-CUT and MAX-Independent Set on random 3- and 4-regular graphs. Our improved lower bounds are obtained by constructing nearly extremal Ramanujan graphs on as many as $163$ vertices, and our upper bounds are obtained via analytical arguments. b) We obtain new inapproximability results for MAX-4-CUT and MAX-3-CUT, proving that it is NP-hard to approximate them within factors of $0.987$ and $0.9649$ respectively, using AlphaEvolve to discover new gadget reductions. Our MAX-4-CUT result improves upon the SOTA of $0.9883$, and our MAX-3-CUT result improves on the current best gadget-based inapproximability result of $0.9853$, but falls short of the SOTA of $16/17$ that relies on a custom PCP (rather than a reduction from ``standard'' Håstad-style PCPs). c) Inapproximability for the metric Traveling Salesman Problem (TSP): We show that it is NP-hard to approximate the minimum cost tour within a factor of $111/110$ using AlphaEvolve to discover a new gadget, thus improving the SOTA of $117/116$. Along the way, we provide new modular soundness and completeness arguments that can be of independent interest. A key technical challenge we faced: verifying a candidate construction produced by AlphaEvolve is costly (sometimes requiring time exponential in the size of the construction). We used AlphaEvolve itself to evolve the verification procedure to be faster (sometimes by $10,000\times$ for our gadgets). Our results suggest that gadget based proofs would benefit from a pass through AI-based tools to obtain stronger results.

d-QBF with Few Existential Variables Revisited

2026-03-09T18:36:52Z

Quantified Boolean Formula (QBF) is a notoriously hard generalization of \textsc{SAT}, especially from the point of view of parameterized complexity, where the problem remains intractable for most standard parameters. A recent work by Eriksson et al.~[IJCAI 24] addressed this by considering the case where the propositional part of the formula is in CNF and we parameterize by the number $k$ of existentially quantified variables. One of their main results was that this natural (but so far overlooked) parameter does lead to fixed-parameter tractability, if we also bound the maximum arity $d$ of the clauses of the given CNF. Unfortunately, their algorithm has a \emph{double-exponential} dependence on $k$ ($2^{2^k}$), even when $d$ is an absolute constant. Since the work of Eriksson et al.\ only complemented this with a SETH-based lower bound implying that a $2^{O(k)}$ dependence is impossible, this left a large gap as an open question. Our main result in this paper is to close this gap by showing that the double-exponential dependence is optimal, assuming the ETH: even for CNFs of arity $4$, QBF with $k$ existential variables cannot be solved in time $2^{2^{o(k)}}|φ|^{O(1)}$. Complementing this, we also consider the further restricted case of QBF with only two quantifier blocks ($\forall\exists$-QBF). We show that in this case the situation improves dramatically: for each $d\ge 3$ we show an algorithm with running time $k^{O_d(k ^{d-1})}|φ|^{O(1)}$ and a lower bound under the ETH showing our algorithm is almost optimal.

Hardness of the Binary Covering Radius Problem in Large $\ell_p$ Norms

2026-03-09T18:11:17Z

We study the hardness of the $γ$-approximate decisional Covering Radius Problem on lattices in the $\ell_p$ norm ($γ$-$\text{GapCRP}_p$). Specifically, we prove that there is an explicit function $γ(p)$, with $γ(p) > 1$ for $p > p_0 \approx 35.31$ and $\lim_{p \to \infty} γ(p) = 9/8$, such that for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, $(γ(p) - \varepsilon)$-$\text{GapCRP}_p$ is $\mathsf{NP}$-hard. This shows the first hardness of $\text{GapCRP}_p$ for explicit $p < \infty$. Work of Haviv and Regev (CCC, 2006 and CJTCS, 2012) previously showed $Π_2$-hardness of approximation for $\text{GapCRP}_p$ for all sufficiently large (but non-explicit) finite $p$ and for $p = \infty$. In fact, our hardness results hold for a variant of $\text{GapCRP}$ called the Binary Covering Radius Problem ($\text{BinGapCRP}$), which trivially reduces to both $\text{GapCRP}$ and the decisional Linear Discrepancy Problem ($\text{LinDisc}$) in any norm in an approximation-preserving way. We also show $Π_2$-hardness of $(9/8 - \varepsilon)$-$\text{BinGapCRP}$ in the $\ell_{\infty}$ norm for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$. Our work extends and heavily uses the work of Manurangsi (IPL, 2021), which showed $Π_2$-hardness of $(9/8 - \varepsilon)$-$\text{LinDisc}$ in the $\ell_{\infty}$ norm.

Learning Functions of Halfspaces

2026-03-09T17:57:19Z

We give an algorithm that learns arbitrary Boolean functions of $k$ arbitrary halfspaces over $\mathbb{R}^n$, in the challenging distribution-free Probably Approximately Correct (PAC) learning model, running in time $2^{\sqrt{n} \cdot (\log n)^{O(k)}}$. This is the first algorithm that can PAC learn even intersections of two halfspaces in time $2^{o(n)}.$

Algorithmic Barriers to Detecting and Repairing Structural Overspecification in Adaptive Data-Structure Selection

2026-03-09T12:15:05Z

We study algorithmic barriers to detecting and repairing a systematic form of structural overspecification in adaptive data-structure selection. An input instance induces an implied workload signature, such as ordering, sparsity, dynamism, locality, or substring structure, and candidate implementations may be preferred because they match that full signature even when the measured workload evidence supports only a strict subset of it. Under a model in which pairwise evaluators favor implementations that realize the implied signature, we show that this preference propagates through both benchmark aggregation and Bradley-Terry-Luce fitting. We then establish two main results. First, determining whether a representation-selection pipeline exhibits structural commitment beyond measured warrant is undecidable on unbounded input domains, by reduction from the halting problem, but decidable by exhaustive enumeration on finite domains. Second, under a conservative repair constraint requiring already evidence-aligned pipelines to remain unchanged, any total computable repair operator admits an overspecified fixed point via Kleene's recursion theorem. These barriers are qualitatively different from classical lower bounds in data-structure design: they do not limit efficiency on finite workloads, but the possibility of uniformly detecting and repairing overspecification across pipeline families.

Quantum information advantage based on Bell inequalities

2026-03-09T03:50:37Z

Recently, Kretschmer et al. [KGD+25] presented an experimental demonstration of a proposed quantum information advantage protocol. We present an alternate proposal based on a relation derived from parallel-repeated CHSH games. Our memory measure is based on an information measure and is different from [KGD+25], where they count the number of qubits. Our proposal has an efficient verifier and a noise-robust quantum prover which is arguably much more efficient compared to [KGD+25].

An improved upper bound measure of star complexity of graphs

2026-03-09T01:14:21Z

In \cite{Standish25c}, I explored the connection between star complexity and information based complexity. Because of the numerical difficulty in computing star complexity, I introduced a proxy measure that is an upper bound to star complexity, and showed a strong albeit non-linear relationship between the measures. In this paper, I introduce a tighter upper bound, by exploiting the well-known ABC package used to optimise logic circuits. In testing the new measure, I found that I had been computing the {\em formula complexity} variant of star complexity, rather than the tighter {\em circuit complexity} variant. Since Jukna clearly states the connection between star complexity and circuit complexity, I have modified the graph walking algorithm to capture circuit complexity rather than formula complexity. With this new ABC-based measure, applied to a set of 1000 500 vertex Erdös-Renyi graphs, a more linear relationship between star complexity and information based complexity is found.

The Theory and Practice of Computing the Bus-Factor

2026-03-08T23:29:08Z

The bus-factor is a measure of project risk with respect to personnel availability, informally defined as the number of people whose sudden unavailability would cause a project to stall or experience severe delays. Despite its intuitive appeal, existing bus-factor measures rely on heterogeneous modeling assumptions, ambiguous definitions of failure, and domain-specific artifacts, limiting their generality, comparability, and ability to capture project fragmentation. In this paper, we develop a unified, domain-agnostic framework for bus-factor estimation by modeling projects as bipartite graphs of people and tasks and casting the computation of the bus-factor as a family of combinatorial optimization problems. Within this framework, we formalize and reconcile two complementary interpretations of the bus-factor, redundancy and criticality, corresponding to the Maximum Redundant Set and the Minimum Critical Set, respectively, and prove that both formulations are NP-hard. Building on this theoretical foundation, we introduce a novel bus-factor measure inspired by network robustness. Unlike prior approaches, the proposed measure captures both loss of coverage and increasing project fragmentation by tracking the largest connected set of tasks under progressive contributor removal. The resulting measure is normalized, threshold-free, and applicable across domains; we show that its exact computation is NP-hard as well. We further propose efficient linear-time approximation algorithms for all considered measures. Finally, we evaluate their behavior through a sensitivity analysis based on controlled perturbations of project structures, guided by expectations derived from project management theory. Our results show that the robustness-based measure behaves consistently with these expectations and provides a more informative and stable assessment of project risk than existing alternatives.

Conditional Complexity Hardness: Monotone Circuit Size, Matrix Rigidity, and Tensor Rank

2026-03-08T17:31:16Z

Proving complexity lower bounds remains a challenging task: we only know how to prove conditional uniform lower bounds and nonuniform lower bounds in restricted circuit models. Williams (STOC 2010) showed how to derive nonuniform lower bounds from uniform upper bounds: by designing a fast algorithm for checking satisfiability of circuits, one gets a lower bound for this circuit class. Since then, a number of results of this kind have been proved. For example, Jahanjou et al. (ICALP 2015) and Carmosino et al. (ITCS 2016) proved that if NSETH fails, then $\text{E}^{\text{NP}}$ has series-parallel circuit size $ω(n)$. One can also derive nonuniform lower bounds from nondeterministic uniform lower bounds. Recent examples include lower bounds on tensor rank, arithmetic circuit size, $\text{ETHR} \circ \text{ETHR}$ circuit size under assumptions that various problems (like TSP, MAX-3-SAT, SAT, Set Cover) cannot be solved faster than in $2^n$ time. In this paper, we continue developing this line of research and show how uniform nondeterministic lower bounds can be used to construct generators of various types of combinatorial objects: Boolean functions of high circuit size, matrices of high rigidity, and tensors of high rank. Specifically, we prove the following. If $k$-SAT cannot be solved in input-oblivious co-nondeterministic time $O(2^{(1/2+\varepsilon)n})$, then there exists a monotone Boolean function family in coNP of monotone circuit size $2^{Ω(n / \log n)}$. This implies win-win circuit lower bounds: either $\text{E}^{\text{NP}}$ requires series-parallel circuits of size $ω(n)$ or coNP requires monotone circuits of size $2^{Ω(n / \log n)}$. If MAX-3-SAT cannot be solved in co-nondeterministic time $O(2^{(1 - \varepsilon)n})$, then there exist small families of matrices with high rigidity as well as small families of three-dimensional tensors of high rank.

On Factorization of Sparse Polynomials of Bounded Individual Degree

2026-03-08T11:18:32Z

We study sparse polynomials with bounded individual degree and their factors, obtaining the following structural and algorithmic results. 1. A deterministic polynomial-time algorithm to find all sparse divisors of a sparse polynomial of bounded individual degree, together with the first upper bound on the number of non-monomial irreducible factors of such polynomials. 2. A $\mathrm{poly}(n,s^{d\log \ell})$-time algorithm that recovers $\ell$ irreducible $s$-sparse polynomials of individual degree at most $d$ from blackbox access to their (not necessarily sparse) product. This partially resolves a question of Dutta-Sinhababu-Thierauf (RANDOM 2024). In particular, if $\ell=O(1)$ the algorithm runs in polynomial time. 3. Deterministic algorithms for factoring a product of $s$-sparse polynomials of individual degree $d$ from blackbox access. Over fields of characteristic zero or sufficiently large characteristic the runtime is $\mathrm{poly}(n,s^{d^3\log n})$; over arbitrary fields it is $\mathrm{poly}(n,(d^2)!,s^{d^5\log n})$. This improves Bhargava-Saraf-Volkovich (JACM 2020), which gives $\mathrm{poly}(n,s^{d^7\log n})$ time for a single sparse polynomial. For a single sparse input we obtain $\mathrm{poly}(n,s^{d^2\log n})$ time. 4. Given blackbox access to a product of factors of sparse polynomials of bounded individual degree, we give a deterministic polynomial-time algorithm to find all irreducible sparse multiquadratic factors with multiplicities. This generalizes the algorithms of Volkovich (RANDOM 2015, 2017) and extends the complete-power test of Bisht-Volkovich (CC 2025). To handle arbitrary fields we introduce a notion of primitive divisors that removes characteristic assumptions from most of our algorithms.

Polynomial-time isomorphism test for $k$-generated extensions of abelian groups

2026-03-08T10:10:52Z

The group isomorphism problem asks whether two finite groups given by their Cayley tables are isomorphic or not. Although there are polynomial-time algorithms for some specific group classes, the best known algorithm for testing isomorphism of arbitrary groups of order $ n $ has time complexity $ n^{O(\log n)} $. We consider the group isomorphism problem for some extensions of abelian groups by $ k $-generated groups for bounded $ k $. In particular, we prove that one can test isomorphism of abelian-by-cyclic extensions in polynomial time, generalizing a 2009 result of Le Gall for coprime extensions. As another application, we give a polynomial-time isomorphism test for abelian-by-simple group extensions, generalizing a 2017 result of Grochow and Qiao for central extensions. The main novelty of the proof is a polynomial-time algorithm for computing the unit group of a finite ring, which might be of independent interest.

I/O complexity and pebble games with partial computations

2026-03-07T12:43:26Z

Optimizing data movements during program executions is essential for achieving high performance in modern computing systems. This has been classically modeled with the Red-Blue Pebble Game and its variants. In existing models, it is typically assumed that the number of red pebbles, i.e., the size of the fast memory, is larger than the maximum in-degree in the computational directed acyclic graph (DAG). Graphs that do not satisfy this constraint need to be first transformed appropriately, which is not a trivial task for general graphs. In this work we propose a Pebble Game variant to model DAGs with arbitrary in-degrees, by allowing partial computations. In the new model, we show that it is NP-complete to decide whether there exists an optimal pebbling strategy with cost $k$, even for single-level DAGs and when only two words fit in the fast memory. Approximation algorithms for special cases are also outlined.

Required-edge Cycle Cover Problem: an ASP-Completeness Framework for Graph Problems and Puzzles

2026-03-06T19:31:02Z

Proving the NP-completeness of pencil-and-paper puzzles typically relies on reductions from combinatorial problems such as the satisfiability problem (SAT). Although the properties of these problems are well studied, their purely combinatorial nature often does not align well with the geometric constraints of puzzles. In this paper, we introduce the Required-edge Cycle Cover Problem (RCCP) -- a variant of the Cycle Cover Problem (CCP) on mixed graphs. CCP on mixed graphs was studied by Seta (2002) to establish the ASP-completeness (i.e., NP-completeness under parsimonious reductions) of the puzzle Kakuro (a.k.a. Cross Sum), and is known to be ASP-complete under certain conditions. We prove the ASP-completeness of RCCP under certain conditions, and strengthen known ASP-completeness results of CCP on mixed graphs as a corollary. Using these results, we resolve the ASP-completeness of Constraint Graph Satisfiability (CGS) in a certain case, addressing an open problem posed by the MIT Hardness Group (2024). We also show that Kakuro remains ASP-complete even when the available digit set is $\{1, 2, 3\}$, consequently completing its complexity classification regarding the maximum available digit and the maximum lengths of contiguous blank cells. It strengthens previously known results of Seta (2002) and Ruepp and Holzer (2010). Furthermore, we introduce a flow model equivalent to the constrained RCCP; this model allows gadgets to be tiled densely on a rectangular grid, which enables us to reduce RCCP to various pencil-and-paper puzzles in a parsimonious manner. By applying this framework, we prove the ASP-completeness of several puzzles, including Chocona, Four Cells, Hinge, and Shimaguni, and strengthen existing NP-completeness results for Choco Banana and Five Cells to ASP-completeness.