Modifications of Quantum Computation and Adaptive Queries to PP

2026-03-13T20:17:27Z

In 2004, Aaronson introduced the complexity class $\mathsf{PostBQP}$ ($\mathsf{BQP}$ with postselection) and showed that it is equal to $\mathsf{PP}$. Following their line of work, we introduce two new complexity classes. The first, $\mathsf{CorrBQP}$, is a modification of $\mathsf{BQP}$ which has the power to perform correlated measurements, i.e. measurements that output the same value across a partition of registers. The second, $\mathsf{MajBQP}$, augments $\mathsf{BQP}$ with the ability to collapse a register to its most likely measurement outcome. Specifically, we consider two variants, $\mathsf{MajBQP}$ and $\mathsf{AdMajBQP}$, where the latter may perform intermediate measurements. We exactly characterize the computational power of the models, $\mathsf{CorrBQP} = \mathsf{AdMajBQP} = \mathsf{BPP}^{\mathsf{PP}}$ and $\mathsf{MajBQP} = \mathsf{P}^{\mathsf{PP}}$. In fact, we show that other metaphysical modifications of $\mathsf{BQP}$, such as $\mathsf{CBQP}$ (i.e. $\mathsf{BQP}$ with the ability to clone arbitrary quantum states), are also equal to $\mathsf{BPP}^{\mathsf{PP}}$. We show that $\mathsf{CorrBQP}$ and $\mathsf{MajBQP}$ are self-low with respect to classically-accessible queries. In contrast, if they were self-low under quantumly-accessible queries, the counting hierarchy would collapse. Furthermore, we introduce a variant of rational degree that lower-bounds the query complexity of $\mathsf{BPP}^{\mathsf{PP}}$. Lastly, we extend the adversary lower-bounding technique to $\mathsf{AdPDQP}$, $\mathsf{BQP}$ with the ability to sample the current state of an algorithm with collapsing it and adapt the computation based on the samples.

FPT Parameterisations of Fractional and Generalised Hypertree Width

2026-03-13T13:07:37Z

We present the first fixed-parameter tractable (FPT) algorithms for exact computation of generalized hypertree width (ghw) and fractional hypertree width (fhw). Our algorithms are parameterized by the target width, the rank, and the maximum degree of the input hypergraph. More generally, we show that testing f-width is in FPT for a broad class of width functions that we call manageable. This class contains the edge cover number $ρ$ and its fractional relaxation $ρ^*$, and thus covers both generalized and fractional hypertree width. We additionally extend our framework to also obtain an fpt algorithm for computing a discretized version of adaptive width. Our approach extends a recent algorithm for treewidth (Bojańcyk & Pilipczuk, LMCS 2022) that utilises monadic second-order transductions. To extend this idea beyond treewidth we develop new combinatorial machinery around elimination forests in hypergraphs, culminating in a structural normal form for optimal witnesses that makes transduction-based optimisation applicable in the much more general context of manageable width functions. This yields the first exact FPT algorithms for these measures under any nontrivial parameterisation and provides structural tools that may enable more direct optimisation algorithms

Hardness of Range Avoidance and Proof Complexity Generators from Demi-Bits

2026-03-13T03:47:26Z

Given a circuit $G: \{0, 1\}^n \to \{0, 1\}^m$ with $m > n$, the *range avoidance* problem ($\text{Avoid}$) asks to output a string $y\in \{0, 1\}^m$ that is not in the range of $G$. Besides its profound connection to circuit complexity and explicit construction problems, this problem is also related to the existence of *proof complexity generators* -- circuits $G: \{0, 1\}^n \to \{0, 1\}^m$ where $m > n$ but for every $y\in \{0, 1\}^m$, it is infeasible to prove the statement "$y\not\in\mathrm{Range}(G)$" in a given propositional proof system. This paper connects these two problems with the existence of *demi-bits generators*, a fundamental cryptographic primitive against nondeterministic adversaries introduced by Rudich (RANDOM '97). $\bullet$ We show that the existence of demi-bits generators implies $\text{Avoid}$ is hard for nondeterministic algorithms. This resolves an open problem raised by Chen and Li (STOC '24). Furthermore, assuming the demi-hardness of certain LPN-style generators or Goldreich' PRG, we prove the hardness of $\text{Avoid}$ even when the instances are constant-degree polynomials over $\mathbb{F}_2$. $\bullet$ We show that the dual weak pigeonhole principle is unprovable in Cook's theory $\mathsf{PV}_1$ under the existence of demi-bits generators secure against $\mathbf{AM}$, thereby separating Jerabek's theory $\mathsf{APC}_1$ from $\mathsf{PV}_1$. $\bullet$ We transform demi-bits generators to proof complexity generators that are *pseudo-surjective* with nearly optimal parameters. Our constructions build on the recent breakthroughs on the hardness of $\text{Avoid}$ by Ilango, Li, and Williams (STOC '23) and Chen and Li (STOC '24). We use *randomness extractors* to significantly simplify the construction and the proof.

A Hierarchy for Constant Communication Complexity

2026-03-12T15:17:22Z

Similarly to the Chomsky hierarchy, we offer a classification of communication complexity measures such that these measures are organized into equivalence classes. Different from previous attempts of this endeavor, we consider two communication complexity measures as equivalent, if, when one is constant, then the other is constant as well, and vice versa. Most previous considerations of similar topics have been using polylogarithmic input length as a defining characteristic of equivalence. In this paper, two measures ${\cal C}_1, {\cal C}_2$ are constant-equivalent, if and only if for all total Boolean (families of) functions $f:\{0, 1\}^n\times\{0, 1\}^n\rightarrow \{0, 1\}$ we have ${\cal C}_1(f)=O(1)$ if and only if ${\cal C}_2(f)=O(1)$. We identify five equivalence classes according to the above equivalence relation. Interestingly, the classification is counter-intuitive in that powerful models of communication are grouped with weak ones, and seemingly weaker models end up on the top of the hierarchy.

Pizza Sharing is PPA-hard

2026-03-12T02:31:17Z

We study the computational complexity of finding a solution for the straight-cut and square-cut pizza sharing problems. We show that computing an $\varepsilon$-approximate solution is PPA-complete for both problems, while finding an exact solution for the square-cut problem is FIXP-hard. Our PPA-hardness results apply for any $\varepsilon < 1/5$, even when all mass distributions consist of non-overlapping axis-aligned rectangles or when they are point sets, and our FIXP-hardness result applies even when all mass distributions are unions of squares and right-angled triangles. We also prove that the decision variants of both approximate problems are NP-complete, while the decision variant for the exact version of square-cut pizza sharing is $\exists\mathbb{R}$-complete.

On the Computational Hardness of Transformers

2026-03-11T21:48:43Z

The transformer has revolutionized modern AI across language, vision, and beyond. It consists of $L$ layers, each running $H$ attention heads in parallel and feeding the combined output to the subsequent layer. In attention, the input consists of $N$ tokens, each a vector of dimension $m$. The attention mechanism involves multiplying three $N \times m$ matrices, applying softmax to an intermediate product. Several recent works have advanced our understanding of the complexity of attention. Known algorithms for transformers compute each attention head independently. This raises a fundamental question that has recurred throughout TCS under the guise of ``direct sum'' problems: can multiple instances of the same problem be solved more efficiently than solving each instance separately? Many answers to this question, both positive and negative, have arisen in fields spanning communication complexity and algorithm design. Thus, we ask whether transformers can be computed more efficiently than $LH$ independent evaluations of attention. In this paper, we resolve this question in the negative, and give the first non-trivial computational lower bounds for multi-head multi-layer transformers. In the small embedding regime ($m = N^{o(1)}$), computing $LH$ attention heads separately takes $LHN^{2 + o(1)}$ time. We establish that this is essentially optimal under SETH. In the large embedding regime ($m = N$), one can compute $LH$ attention heads separately using $LHN^{ω+ o(1)}$ arithmetic operations (plus exponents), where $ω$ is the matrix multiplication exponent. We establish that this is optimal, by showing that $LHN^{ω- o(1)}$ arithmetic operations are necessary when $ω> 2$. Our lower bound in the large embedding regime relies on a novel application of the Baur-Strassen theorem, a powerful algorithmic tool underpinning the famous backpropagation algorithm.

Deciding winning strategies in Yu-Gi-Oh! TCG is hard

2026-03-11T16:43:11Z

Motivated by the results for Magic: The Gathering presented in [CBH20] and [Bid20], we study a (different) computability problem about winning strategies in Yu-Gi-Oh! Trading Card Game, a popular card game developed and published by Konami. We show that the problem of establishing whether, from a given game state, a given computable strategy is winning is undecidable. In particular, not only do we prove that the Halting Problem can be reduced to this problem, but also that this problem is actually $Π^1_1$-complete. We extend this last result to all strategies with a reduction on the set of countable well orders, a classic $\boldsymbolΠ^1_1$-complete set. For these reductions, we present two legal decks (according to the current Forbidden & Limited List of Yu-Gi-Oh! Trading Card Game) that can be used by the player who goes first to perform them.

The Power of Shallow-depth Toffoli and Qudit Quantum Circuits

2026-03-11T14:10:54Z

The relevance of shallow-depth quantum circuits has recently increased, mainly due to their applicability to near-term devices. In this context, one of the main goals of quantum circuit complexity is to find problems that can be solved by shallow quantum circuits but require more computational resources classically. Our first contribution in this work is to prove new separations between classical and quantum constant-depth circuits. Firstly, we show a separation between constant-depth quantum circuits with quantum advice $\mathsf{QNC}^0/\mathsf{qpoly}$, and $\mathsf{AC}^0[p]$, which is the class of classical constant-depth circuits with unbounded-fan in and $\mathsf{MOD}_{p}$ gates. Additionally, we show a separation between $\mathsf{QAC}^0$, the circuit class containing Toffoli gates with unbounded control, and $\mathsf{AC}^0[p]$, when $\mathsf{QAC}^0$ is augmented with additional mid-circuit measurements and classical fanout. This establishes the first such separation for a shallow-depth quantum class that does not involve quantum fanout gates, while relying solely on finite quantum gate sets. Equivalently, this yields a separation between $\mathsf{AC}^0[p]$ and $[\mathsf{QNC}^0, \mathsf{AC}^0]^2$, i.e., shallow quantum circuits interleaved with simple classical computation. Secondly, we consider $\mathsf{QNC}^0$ circuits with infinite-size gate sets. We show that these circuits, along with quantum prime modular gates or classical prime modular gates in combination with classical fanout, can implement threshold gates, showing that $\mathsf{QNC}^0[p]=\mathsf{QTC}^0$. Finally, we also show that in the infinite-size gate set case, these quantum circuit classes for higher-dimensional Hilbert spaces do not offer any advantage to standard qubit implementations.

Punctually Standard and Nonstandard Models of Natural Numbers

2026-03-11T09:46:15Z

Abstract models of computation often treat the successor function $S$ on $\mathbb{N}$ as a primitive operation, even though its low-level implementations correspond to non-trivial programs operating on specific numerical representations. This behaviour can be analyzed without referring to notations by replacing the standard interpretation $(\mathbb{N}, S)$ with an isomorphic copy ${\mathcal A} = (\mathbb{N}, S^{\mathcal A})$, in which $S^{\mathcal A}$ is no longer computable by a single instruction. While the class of computable functions on $\mathcal{A}$ is standard if $S^{\mathcal{A}}$ is computable, existing results indicate that this invariance fails at the level of primitive recursion. We investigate which sets of operations have the property that if they are primitive recursive on $\mathcal A$ then the class of primitive recursive functions on $\mathcal A$ remains standard. We call such sets of operations \emph{bases for punctual standardness}. We exhibit a series of non-basis results which show how the induced class of primitive recursive functions on $\mathcal A$ can deviate substantially from the standard one. In particular, we demonstrate that a wide range of natural operations, including large subclasses of primitive recursive functions studied by Skolem and Levitz, fail to form such bases. On the positive side, we exhibit natural finite bases for punctual standardness. Our results answer a question recently posed by Grabmayr and establish punctual categoricity for certain natural finitely generated structures.

Permutation Match Puzzles: How Young Tanvi Learned About Computational Complexity

2026-03-11T06:56:25Z

We study a family of sorting match puzzles on grids, which we call permutation match puzzles. In this puzzle, each row and column of a $n \times n$ grid is labeled with an ordering constraint -- ascending (A) or descending (D) -- and the goal is to fill the grid with the numbers 1 through $n^2$ such that each row and column respects its constraint. We provide a complete characterization of solvable puzzles: a puzzle admits a solution if and only if its associated constraint graph is acyclic, which translates to a simple "at most one switch" condition on the A/D labels. When solutions exist, we show that their count is given by a hook length formula. For unsolvable puzzles, we present an $O(n)$ algorithm to compute the minimum number of label flips required to reach a solvable configuration. Finally, we consider a generalization where rows and columns may specify arbitrary permutations rather than simple orderings, and establish that finding minimal repairs in this setting is NP-complete by a reduction from feedback arc set.

Computational Complexity in Property Testing

2026-03-10T19:18:21Z

We initiate a systematic study of the computational complexity of property testing, focusing on the relationship between query and time complexity. While traditional work in property testing has emphasized query complexity, relatively little is known about the computational hardness of property testers. Our goal is to chart the landscape of time-query interplay and develop tools for proving time complexity lower bounds. Our first contribution is a pair of time-query hierarchy theorems for property testing. For all suitable nondecreasing functions $q(n)$ and $t(n)$ with $t(n)\geq q(n)$, we construct properties with query complexity $\tildeΘ(q(n))$ and time complexity $\tildeΩ(t(n))$. Our weak hierarchy holds unconditionally, whereas the strong version-assuming the Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis-provides better control over the time complexity of the constructed properties. We then turn to halfspaces in $\mathbb{R}^d$, a fundamental class in property testing and learning theory. We study the problem of approximating the distance from the input function to the nearest halfspace within additive error $ε$. For the distribution-free distance approximation problem, known algorithms achieve query complexity $O(d/ε^2)$, but take time $\tildeΘ(1/ε^d)$. We provide a fine-grained justification for this gap: assuming the $k$-SUM conjecture, any algorithm must have running time $Ω(1/ε^{d/2})$. This fine-grained lower bound yields a provable separation between query and time complexity for a natural and well-studied (tolerant) testing problem. We also prove that any Statistical Query (SQ) algorithm under the standard Gaussian distribution requires $(1/ε)^{Ω(d)}$ queries if the queries are answered with additive error up to $ε^{Ω(d)}$, revealing a fundamental barrier even in the distribution-specific setting.

Tetris is Hard with Just One Piece Type

2026-03-10T17:53:30Z

We analyze the computational complexity of Tetris clearing (determining whether the player can clear an initial board using a given sequence of pieces) and survival (determining whether the player can avoid losing before placing all the given pieces in an initial board) when restricted to a single polyomino piece type. We prove, for any tetromino piece type $P$ except for O, the NP-hardness of Tetris clearing and survival under the standard Super Rotation System (SRS), even when the input sequence consists of only a specified number of $P$ pieces. These surprising results disprove a 23-year-old conjecture on the computational complexity of Tetris with only I pieces (although our result is only for a specific rotation system). As a corollary, we prove the NP-hardness of Tetris clearing when the sequence of pieces has to be able to be generated from a $7k$-bag randomizer for any positive integer $k\geq 1$. On the positive side, we give polynomial-time algorithms for Tetris clearing and survival when the input sequence consists of only dominoes, assuming a particular rotation model, solving a version of a 9-year-old open problem. Along the way, we give polynomial-time algorithms for Tetris clearing and survival with $1\times k$ pieces (for any fixed $k$), provided the top $k-1$ rows are initially empty, showing that our I NP-hardness result needs to have filled cells in the top three rows.

A base change framework for tensor functions

2026-03-10T17:17:13Z

The main contribution of this note is to establish a framework to extend results of tensor functions over specific field to general field. As a consequence of this framework, we extend the existing work to more general settings: \emph{(1)} slice rank is linearly bounded by geometric rank for any 3-tensors over any field. \emph{(2)} slice rank of any 3-tensors is quasi-supermultiplicative. As a consequence, the asymptotic slice rank exists for any 3-tensors.

Has quantum advantage been achieved?

2026-03-10T16:55:03Z

Quantum computational advantage was claimed for the first time in 2019 and several experiments since then have reinforced the claim. And yet, there is no consensus whether or not quantum advantage has actually been achieved. In this article, I address this question and argue that, in fact, it has. I also outline next steps for theory and experiments in quantum advantage.

Almost-Optimal Upper and Lower Bounds for Clustering in Low Dimensional Euclidean Spaces

2026-03-10T16:08:07Z

The $k$-median and $k$-means clustering objectives are classic objectives for modeling clustering in a metric space. Given a set of points in a metric space, the goal of the $k$-median (resp. $k$-means) problem is to find $k$ representative points so as to minimize the sum of the distances (resp. sum of squared distances) from each point to its closest representative. Cohen-Addad, Feldmann, and Saulpic [JACM'21] showed how to obtain a $(1+\varepsilon)$-factor approximation in low-dimensional Euclidean metric for both the $k$-median and $k$-means problems in near-linear time $2^{(1/\varepsilon)^{O(d^2)}} n \cdot \text{polylog}(n)$ (where $d$ is the dimension and $n$ is the number of input points). We improve this running time to $2^{\tilde{O}(1/\varepsilon)^{d-1}} \cdot n \cdot \text{polylog}(n)$, and show an almost matching lower bound: under the Gap Exponential Time Hypothesis for 3-SAT, there is no $2^{{o}(1/\varepsilon^{d-1})} n^{O(1)}$ algorithm achieving a $(1+\varepsilon)$-approximation for $k$-means.