Constant-Depth Unitary Preparation of Dicke States

2026-03-20T17:29:10Z

Dicke states serve as a critical resource in quantum metrology, communication, and computation. However, unitary preparation of Dicke states is limited to logarithmic depth in standard circuit models and existing constant-depth protocols require measurement and feed-forward. In this work, we present the first unitary, constant-depth protocols for exact Dicke state preparation. We overcome the logarithmic-depth barrier by moving beyond the standard circuit model and leveraging global interactions (native to architectures such as neutral atoms and trapped ions). Specifically, utilizing unbounded CZ gates (i.e. within the QAC$^0$ circuit class), we offer circuits for exact computation of constant-weight Dicke states, using polynomial ancillae, and approximation of weight-1 Dicke states (i.e. $W$ states), using only constant ancillae. Granted additional access to the quantum FAN-OUT operation (i.e. upgrading to the QAC$_f^0$ circuit class), we also achieve exact and clean preparation of arbitrary-weight Dicke states, with polynomial ancillae. These protocols distinguish the constant-depth capabilities of quantum architectures based on connectivity and offer a novel path toward resolving a long-standing quantum complexity conjecture.

The monotonicity of the Franz-Parisi potential is equivalent with Low-degree MMSE lower bounds

2026-03-20T15:53:34Z

Over the last decades, two distinct approaches have been instrumental to our understanding of the computational complexity of statistical estimation. The statistical physics literature predicts algorithmic hardness through local stability and monotonicity properties of the Franz--Parisi (FP) potential \cite{franz1995recipes,franz1997phase}, while the mathematically rigorous literature characterizes hardness via the limitations of restricted algorithmic classes, most notably low-degree polynomial estimators \cite{hopkins2017efficient}. For many inference models, these two perspectives yield strikingly consistent predictions, giving rise to a long-standing open problem of establishing a precise mathematical relationship between them. In this work, we show that for estimation problems the power of low-degree polynomials is equivalent to the monotonicity of the annealed FP potential for a broad family of Gaussian additive models (GAMs) with signal-to-noise ratio $λ$. In particular, subject to a low-degree conjecture for GAMs, our results imply that the polynomial-time limits of these models are directly implied by the monotonicity of the annealed FP potential, in conceptual agreement with predictions from the physics literature dating back to the 1990s.

Search-Driven Clause Learning for Product-State Quantum $k$-SAT (PRODSAT-QSAT)

2026-03-20T15:22:27Z

We study PRODSAT-QSAT($k$): given rank-one $k$-local projectors, determine whether a quantum $k$-SAT instance admits a satisfying product state. We present a CDCL-style refutation framework that searches a finite partition of each qubit's Bloch sphere while a sound theory solver checks region feasibility using a geometric overapproximation of the projection amplitudes for each constraint. When the theory solver proves that no state in a region can satisfy a constraint, it produces a sound conflict clause that blocks that region; accumulated blocking clauses can yield a global result of product-state unsatisfiability (UN-PRODSAT). We formalise the problem, prove the soundness of the clause-learning rule, and describe a practical algorithm and implementation.

Constrained Nonnegative Gram Feasibility is $\exists\mathbb{R}$-Complete

2026-03-20T14:20:28Z

We study the computational complexity of constrained nonnegative Gram feasibility. Given a partially specified symmetric matrix together with affine relations among selected entries, the problem asks whether there exists a nonnegative matrix $H \in \mathbb{R}_+^{n\times r}$ such that $W = HH^\top$ satisfies all specified entries and affine constraints. Such factorizations arise naturally in structured low-rank matrix representations and geometric embedding problems. We prove that this feasibility problem is $\exists\mathbb{R}$-complete already for rank $r=2$. The hardness result is obtained via a polynomial-time reduction from the arithmetic feasibility problem \textsc{ETR-AMI}. The reduction exploits a geometric encoding of arithmetic constraints within rank-$2$ nonnegative Gram representations: by fixing anchor directions in $\mathbb{R}_+^2$ and representing variables through vectors of the form $(x,1)$, addition and multiplication constraints can be realized through inner-product relations. Combined with the semialgebraic formulation of the feasibility conditions, this establishes $\exists\mathbb{R}$-completeness. We further show that the hardness extends to every fixed rank $r\ge 2$. Our results place constrained symmetric nonnegative Gram factorization among the growing family of geometric feasibility problems that are complete for the existential theory of the reals. Finally, we discuss limitations of the result and highlight the open problem of determining the complexity of unconstrained symmetric nonnegative factorization feasibility.

Minimum Stable Cut and Treewidth

2026-03-20T12:52:59Z

A stable or locally-optimal cut of a graph is a cut whose weight cannot be increased by changing the side of a single vertex. In this paper we study Minimum Stable Cut, the problem of finding a stable cut of minimum weight. Since this problem is NP-hard, we study its complexity on graphs of low treewidth, low degree, or both. We begin by showing that the problem remains weakly NP-hard on severely restricted trees, so bounding treewidth alone cannot make it tractable. We match this hardness with a pseudo-polynomial DP algorithm solving the problem in time $(Δ\cdot W)^{O(tw)}n^{O(1)}$, where $tw$ is the treewidth, $Δ$ the maximum degree, and $W$ the maximum weight. On the other hand, bounding $Δ$ is also not enough, as the problem is NP-hard for unweighted graphs of bounded degree. We therefore parameterize Minimum Stable Cut by both $tw$ and $Δ$ and obtain an FPT algorithm running in time $2^{O(Δtw)}(n+\log W)^{O(1)}$. Our main result for the weighted problem is to provide a reduction showing that both aforementioned algorithms are essentially optimal, even if we replace treewidth by pathwidth: if there exists an algorithm running in $(nW)^{o(pw)}$ or $2^{o(Δpw)}(n+\log W)^{O(1)}$, then the ETH is false. Complementing this, we show that we can, however, obtain an FPT approximation scheme parameterized by treewidth, if we consider almost-stable solutions, that is, solutions where no single vertex can unilaterally increase the weight of its incident cut edges by more than a factor of $(1+\varepsilon)$. Motivated by these mostly negative results, we consider Unweighted Minimum Stable Cut. Here our results already imply a much faster exact algorithm running in time $Δ^{O(tw)}n^{O(1)}$. We show that this is also probably essentially optimal: an algorithm running in $n^{o(pw)}$ would contradict the ETH.

Hardness of some optimization problems over correlation polyhedra

2026-03-20T09:33:21Z

We prove the \textbf{NP}-hardness, using Karp reductions, of some problems related to the correlation polytope and its corresponding cone, spanned by all of the $n\times n$ rank-one matrices over $\{0,1\}$. The problems are: membership, rank of the decomposition, and a ``relaxed rank'' obtained from relaxing the zero-norm expression for the rank to an $\ell_1$ norm. While membership and rank are natural problems for any matrix cone, the relaxed rank problem occurs in some signal processing and statistical applications.

SHAP Meets Tensor Networks: Provably Tractable Explanations with Parallelism

2026-03-19T22:29:28Z

Although Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) can be computed in polynomial time for simple models like decision trees, they unfortunately become NP-hard to compute for more expressive black-box models like neural networks - where generating explanations is often most critical. In this work, we analyze the problem of computing SHAP explanations for *Tensor Networks (TNs)*, a broader and more expressive class of models than those for which current exact SHAP algorithms are known to hold, and which is widely used for neural network abstraction and compression. First, we introduce a general framework for computing provably exact SHAP explanations for general TNs with arbitrary structures. Interestingly, we show that, when TNs are restricted to a *Tensor Train (TT)* structure, SHAP computation can be performed in *poly-logarithmic* time using *parallel* computation. Thanks to the expressiveness power of TTs, this complexity result can be generalized to many other popular ML models such as decision trees, tree ensembles, linear models, and linear RNNs, therefore tightening previously reported complexity results for these families of models. Finally, by leveraging reductions of binarized neural networks to Tensor Network representations, we demonstrate that SHAP computation can become *efficiently tractable* when the network's *width* is fixed, while it remains computationally hard even with constant *depth*. This highlights an important insight: for this class of models, width - rather than depth - emerges as the primary computational bottleneck in SHAP computation.

Communication Complexity of Disjointness under Product Distributions

2026-03-19T21:43:04Z

Determining the randomized (or distributional) communication complexity of disjointness is a central problem in communication complexity, having roots in the foundational work of Babai, Frankl, and Simon in the 1980s and culminating in the famous works of Kalyanasundaram-Schnitger and Razborov in 1992. However, the question of obtaining tight bounds for product distributions persisted until the more recent work of Bottesch, Gavinsky, and Klauck resolved it. In this note we revisit this classical problem and give a short, streamlined proof of the best bounds, with improved quantitative dependence on the error parameter. Our approach is based on a simple combinatorial lemma that may be of independent interest: if two sets drawn independently from two distributions are disjoint with non-negligible probability, then one can extract two subfamilies of reasonably large measure that are fully cross-disjoint (equivalently, a large monochromatic rectangle for disjointness).

Lazy Kronecker Product

2026-03-19T20:14:50Z

In this paper, we show how to generalize the lazy update regime from dynamic matrix product [Cohen, Lee, Song STOC 2019, JACM 2021] to dynamic kronecker product. We provide an algorithm that uses $n^{ω( \lceil k/2 \rceil, \lfloor k/2 \rfloor, a )-a}$ amortized update time and $ n^{ω( \lceil(k-s)/2 \rceil, \lfloor (k-s)/2 \rfloor,a )}$ worst case query time for dynamic kronecker product problem. Unless tensor MV conjecture is false, there is no algorithm that can use both $n^{ω( \lceil k/2 \rceil, \lfloor k/2 \rfloor, a )-a-Ω(1)}$ amortized update time, and $ n^{ω( \lceil(k-s)/2 \rceil, \lfloor (k-s)/2 \rfloor,a )-Ω(1)}$ worst case query time.

Complexity of Auctions with Interdependence

2026-03-19T09:30:30Z

We study auction design in the celebrated interdependence model introduced by Milgrom and Weber [1982], where a mechanism designer allocates a good, maximizing the value of the agent who receives it, while inducing truthfulness using payments. In the lesser-studied procurement auctions, one allocates a chore, minimizing the cost incurred by the agent selected to perform it. Most of the past literature in theoretical computer science considers designing truthful mechanisms with constant approximation for the value setting, with restricted domains and monotone valuation functions. In this work, we study the general computational problems of optimizing the approximation ratio of truthful mechanism, for both value and cost, in the deterministic and randomized settings. Unlike most previous works, we remove the domain restriction and the monotonicity assumption imposed on value functions. We provide theoretical explanations for why some previously considered special cases are tractable, reducing them to classical combinatorial problems, and providing efficient algorithms and characterizations. We complement our positive results with hardness results for the general case, providing query complexity lower bounds, and proving the NP-Hardness of the general case.

The Unit Gap: How Sharing Works in Boolean Circuits

2026-03-19T07:04:57Z

We study the gap between the minimum size of a Boolean circuit (DAG) and the minimum size of a formula (tree circuit) over the And-Inverter Graph (AIG) basis {AND, NOT} with free inversions. We prove that this gap is always 0 or 1 (Unit Gap Theorem), that sharing requires opt(f) >= n essential variables (Threshold Theorem), and that no sharing is needed when opt(f) <= 3 (Tree Theorem). Gate counts in optimal circuits satisfy an exact decomposition formula with a binary sharing term. When the gap equals 1, it arises from exactly one gate with fan-out 2, employing either dual-polarity or same-polarity reuse; we prove that no other sharing structure can produce a unit gap.

Computation-Utility-Privacy Tradeoffs in Bayesian Estimation

2026-03-18T20:20:58Z

Bayesian methods lie at the heart of modern data science and provide a powerful scaffolding for estimation in data-constrained settings and principled quantification and propagation of uncertainty. Yet in many real-world use cases where these methods are deployed, there is a natural need to preserve the privacy of the individuals whose data is being scrutinized. While a number of works have attempted to approach the problem of differentially private Bayesian estimation through either reasoning about the inherent privacy of the posterior distribution or privatizing off-the-shelf Bayesian methods, these works generally do not come with rigorous utility guarantees beyond low-dimensional settings. In fact, even for the prototypical tasks of Gaussian mean estimation and linear regression, it was unknown how close one could get to the Bayes-optimal error with a private algorithm, even in the simplest case where the unknown parameter comes from a Gaussian prior. In this work, we give the first efficient algorithms for both of these problems that achieve mean-squared error $(1+o(1))\mathrm{OPT}$ and additionally show that both tasks exhibit an intriguing computational-statistical gap. For Bayesian mean estimation, we prove that the excess risk achieved by our method is optimal among all efficient algorithms within the low-degree framework, yet is provably worse than what is achievable by an exponential-time algorithm. For linear regression, we prove a qualitatively similar lower bound. Our algorithms draw upon the privacy-to-robustness framework of arXiv:2212.05015, but with the curious twist that to achieve private Bayes-optimal estimation, we need to design sum-of-squares-based robust estimators for inherently non-robust objects like the empirical mean and OLS estimator. Along the way we also add to the sum-of-squares toolkit a new kind of constraint based on short-flat decompositions.

Physically-Motivated Guiding States for Local Hamiltonians

2026-03-17T22:13:22Z

We study the computational complexity of the Guided Local Hamiltonian problem: given a local Hamiltonian $H$ together with a classical description of a guiding state that has non-negligible overlap with the ground state of $H$, estimate the ground-state energy within inverse-polynomial precision. This setting captures real-world scenarios in quantum chemistry and many-body physics, where trial states derived from classical heuristics can be used to guide quantum algorithms. We identify families of physically-motivated guiding states for which the computational hardness of ground-state energy estimation persists in the guided setting. Extending prior results for semi-classical subset states, we prove BQP-hardness for classes including fixed-weight states, matrix product states, Gaussian states, and Fendley states. Our hardness results are obtained via refined Feynman-Kitaev circuit-to-Hamiltonian constructions that explicitly expose the structural role of the guiding state in the reduction. Complementing these results, we give a constructive proof of BQP containment when the guiding state admits a polynomial-size classical description, establishing BQP-completeness for the canonical formulation of the problem. Our results show that quantum advantage persists for the newly introduced state classes, and classical methods also remain viable when said guiding states admit appropriate descriptions. Together, our results identify a Goldilocks zone of guiding states that are efficiently preparable, succinctly described, and sample-query accessible, within which quantum advantage for ground-state estimation can be meaningfully assessed. We additionally formalise the Guided Fermi-Hubbard Hamiltonian problem and prove BQP-completeness on 2D square and triangular lattices, both with and without magnetic fields, when provided with an appropriate fermionic guiding state.

Hardness of recognizing phases of matter

2026-03-17T20:30:58Z

We prove that recognizing the phase of matter of an unknown quantum state is quantum computationally hard. More specifically, we show that the quantum computational time of any phase recognition algorithm must grow exponentially in the range of correlations $ξ$ of the unknown state. This exponential growth renders the problem practically infeasible for even moderate correlation ranges, and leads to super-polynomial quantum computational time in the system size $n$ whenever $ξ= ω(\log n)$. Our results apply to a substantial portion of all known phases of matter, including symmetry-breaking phases and symmetry-protected topological phases for any discrete on-site symmetry group in any spatial dimension. To establish this hardness, we extend the study of pseudorandom unitaries (PRUs) to quantum systems with symmetries. We prove that symmetric PRUs exist under standard cryptographic conjectures, and can be constructed in extremely low circuit depths. We also establish hardness for systems with translation invariance and purely classical phases of matter. A key technical limitation is that the locality of the parent Hamiltonians of the states we consider is linear in $ξ$; the complexity of phase recognition for Hamiltonians with constant locality remains an important open question.

On Big-M Reformulations of Bilevel Linear Programs: Hardness of A Posteriori Verification

2026-03-17T19:57:57Z

A standard approach to solving optimistic bilevel linear programs (BLPs) is to replace the lower-level problem with its Karush-Kuhn-Tucker (KKT) optimality conditions and reformulate the resulting complementarity constraints using auxiliary binary variables. This yields a single-level mixed-integer linear programming (MILP) model involving big-$M$ parameters. While sufficiently large and bilevel-correct big-$M$s can be computed in polynomial time, verifying a priori that given big-$M$s do not cut off any feasible or optimal lower-level solutions is known to be computationally difficult. In this paper, we establish two complementary hardness results. First, we show that, even with a single potentially incorrect big-$M$ parameter, it is $coNP$-complete to verify a posteriori whether the optimal solution of the resulting MILP model is bilevel optimal. In particular, this negative result persists for min-max problems without coupling constraints and applies to strong-duality-based reformulations of mixed-integer BLPs. Second, we show that verifying global big-$M$ correctness remains computationally difficult a posteriori, even when an optimal solution of the MILP model is available.