https://arxiv.org/api/TtypoennobeObDBV/Ar9i/r+Cdk2026-06-11T11:20:30Z1294052515http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.22211v1Topological Collapse: P = NP Implies #P = FP via Solution-Space Homology2026-03-23T17:09:56ZWe prove that P = NP implies #P = FP by exploiting the topological structure of 3SAT solution spaces. The argument proceeds via a dichotomy: any polynomial-time algorithm for 3SAT either operates without global knowledge of the solution-space topology, in which case it cannot certify unsatisfiability for instances with second Betti number b_2 = 2^{Omega(N)} (leading to contradiction), or it computes global topological invariants, which are #P-hard. As local information is provably insufficient and any useful global invariant is #P-hard, the dichotomy is exhaustive. The proof is non-relativizing, consistent with oracles separating P = NP from #P = FP, and therefore necessarily exploits non-oracle properties of computation. Combined with Toda's theorem, the result yields P = NP => #P = FP => PH = P, providing new structural evidence for P != NP via a topological mechanism. We complement the theoretical framework with empirical validation of solution-space shattering at scale (N up to 500), demonstrating that these topological barriers manifest as measurable hardness across five independent algorithm classes.2026-03-23T17:09:56ZM. Alaslihttp://arxiv.org/abs/2603.22192v1Stable Algorithms Lower Bounds for Estimation2026-03-23T16:50:24ZIn this work, we show that for all statistical estimation problems, a natural MMSE instability (discontinuity) condition implies the failure of stable algorithms, serving as a version of OGP for estimation tasks. Using this criterion, we establish separations between stable and polynomial-time algorithms for the following MMSE-unstable tasks (i) Planted Shortest Path, where Dijkstra's algorithm succeeds, (ii) random Parity Codes, where Gaussian elimination succeeds, and (iii) Gaussian Subset Sum, where lattice-based methods succeed. For all three, we further show that all low-degree polynomials are stable, yielding separations against low-degree methods and a new method to bound the low-degree MMSE. In particular, our technique highlights that MMSE instability is a common feature for Shortest Path and the noiseless Parity Codes and Gaussian subset sum.
Last, we highlight that our work places rigorous algorithmic footing on the long-standing physics belief that first-order phase transitions--which in this setting translates to MMSE-instability impose fundamental limits on classes of efficient algorithms.2026-03-23T16:50:24Z82 pages, 2 figuresXifan YuIlias Zadikhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2603.22064v1The color code, the surface code, and the transversal CNOT: NP-hardness of minimum-weight decoding2026-03-23T14:57:38ZThe decoding problem is a ubiquitous algorithmic task in fault-tolerant quantum computing, and solving it efficiently is essential for scalable quantum computing. Here, we prove that minimum-weight decoding is NP-hard in three quintessential settings: (i) the color code with Pauli $Z$ errors, (ii) the surface code with Pauli $X$, $Y$ and $Z$ errors, and (iii) the surface code with a transversal CNOT gate, Pauli $Z$ and measurement bit-flip errors. Our results show that computational intractability already arises in basic and practically relevant decoding problems central to both quantum memories and logical circuit implementations, highlighting a sharp computational complexity separation between minimum-weight decoding and its approximate realizations.2026-03-23T14:57:38Z18 pages, 12 figuresShouzhen GuLily WangAleksander Kubicahttp://arxiv.org/abs/2603.22063v1On the Complexity of Fundamental Problems for DAG-Compressed Graphs2026-03-23T14:57:34ZA DAG compression of a (typically dense) graph is a simple data structure that stores how vertex clusters are connected, where the clusters are described indirectly as sets of reachable sinks in a directed acyclic graph (DAG). They generalize tree compressions, where the clusters form a tree-like hierarchy, and we give the first proof that DAG compressions can achieve better compressions than tree compressions. Our interest in DAG compression stems from the fact that several simple standard algorithms, like breadth-first search on graphs, can be implemented so that they work directly on the compressed rather than on the original graph and so that, crucially, the runtime is relative to the (typically small) size of the compressed graph. We add another entry to the list of algorithms where this is possible, by showing that Kruskal's algorithm for computing minimum spanning trees can be adapted to work directly on DAG compressions. On the negative side, we answer the central open problem from previous work, namely how hard it is to compute a minimum-size DAG compression for a given graph: This is NP-hard; and this is even the case for the dynamic setting, where we must update the DAG compression optimally when a single edge is added or deleted in the input graph.2026-03-23T14:57:34ZFlorian ChudigiewitschTill TantauFelix Winklerhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2603.22043v1The Descriptive Complexity of Relation Modification Problems2026-03-23T14:42:49ZA relation modification problem gets a logical structure and a natural number k as input and asks whether k modifications of the structure suffice to make it satisfy a predefined property. We provide a complete classification of the classical and parameterized complexity of relation modification problems - the latter w. r. t. the modification budget k - based on the descriptive complexity of the respective target property. We consider different types of logical structures on which modifications are performed: Whereas monadic structures and undirected graphs without self-loops each yield their own complexity landscapes, we find that modifying undirected graphs with self-loops, directed graphs, or arbitrary logical structures is equally hard w. r. t. quantifier patterns.
Moreover, we observe that all classes of problems considered in this paper are subject to a strong dichotomy in the sense that they are either very easy to solve (that is, they lie in paraAC^{0\uparrow} or TC^0) or intractable (that is, they contain W[2]-hard or NP-hard problems).2026-03-23T14:42:49ZFlorian ChudigiewitschMarlene GründelChristian KomusiewiczNils MorawietzTill Tantauhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2603.21442v1Finding Minimum Distance Preservers: A Parameterized Study2026-03-22T23:14:42Z For a given graph $G$ and a subset of vertices $S$, a \emph{distance preserver} is a subgraph of $G$ that preserves shortest paths between the vertices of $S$.
We distinguish between a \emph{subsetwise} distance preserver, which preserves distances between all pairs in $S$, and a \emph{pairwise} distance preserver, which preserves distances only between specific pairs of vertices in $S$, given in the input.
While a large body of work is dedicated to upper and lower bounds on the size of distance preservers and, more generally, graph spanners, the computational complexity of finding the minimum distance preserver has received comparatively little attention.
We consider the respective \scup{Subsetwise Distance Preserver}\xspace (\scup{SDP}\xspace) and \scup{Pairwise Distance Preserver}\xspace (\scup{PDP}\xspace) problems and initiate the study of their computational complexity.
We provide a detailed complexity landscape with respect to natural parameters, including the number of terminals, solution size, vertex cover, and treewidth.
Our main contributions are as follows:
\begin{itemize}
\setlength{\itemsep}{0.5em}
\item Both \scup{PDP}\xspace and \scup{SDP}\xspace are \nph\ even on subgraphs of the grid. Moreover, when parameterized by the number of terminals, the problems are \wh{1}\ on subgraphs of the grid, while they become \textsc{FPT}\ on full grids.
\item \scup{PDP}\xspace is \nph\ on graphs of vertex cover $3$, while \scup{SDP}\xspace is \textsc{FPT}\ when parameterized by the vertex cover of the graph. Thus, the vertex cover parameter distinguishes the two variants.
\item Both problems are \textsc{FPT}\ when parameterized by the number of terminals and the treewidth of the graph.
\end{itemize}2026-03-22T23:14:42ZKirill SimonovFarehe SoheilShaily Vermahttp://arxiv.org/abs/2603.21406v1Critical window for approximate counting in dense Ising models2026-03-22T21:22:58ZWe study the complexity of approximating the partition function of dense Ising models in the critical regime. Recent work of Chen, Chen, Yin, and Zhang (FOCS 2025) established fast mixing at criticality, and even beyond criticality in a window of width $N^{-1/2}$. We complement these algorithmic results by proving nearly tight hardness bounds, thus yielding the first instance of a sharp scaling window for the computational complexity of approximate counting.
Specifically, for the dense Ising model we show that approximating the partition function is computationally hard within a window of width $N^{-1/2+\varepsilon}$ for any constant $\varepsilon>0$. Standard hardness reductions for non-critical regimes break down at criticality due to bigger fluctuations in the underlying gadgets, leading to suboptimal bounds. We overcome this barrier via a global approach which aggregates fluctuations across all gadgets rather than requiring tight concentration guarantees for each individually. This new approach yields the optimal exponent for the critical window.2026-03-22T21:22:58ZAndreas GalanisDaniel StefankovicEric Vigodahttp://arxiv.org/abs/2603.21353v1Classification of Non-redundancy of Boolean Predicates of Arity 42026-03-22T18:27:50ZGiven a constraint satisfaction problem (CSP) predicate $P \subseteq D^r$, the non-redundancy (NRD) of $P$ is maximum-sized instance on $n$ variables such that for every clause of the instance, there is an assignment which satisfies all but that clause. The study of NRD for various CSPs is an active area of research which combines ideas from extremal combinatorics, logic, lattice theory, and other techniques. Complete classifications are known in the cases $r=2$ and $(|D|=2, r=3)$.
In this paper, we give a near-complete classification of the case $(|D|=2, r=4)$. Of the 400 distinct non-trivial Boolean predicates of arity 4, we implement an algorithmic procedure which perfectly classifies 397 of them. Of the remaining three, we solve two by reducing to extremal combinatorics problems -- leaving the last one as an open question. Along the way, we identify the first Boolean predicate whose non-redundancy asymptotics are non-polynomial.2026-03-22T18:27:50ZJoshua BrakensiekVenkatesan GuruswamiAaron Puttermanhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2408.15181v2On the parameterized complexity of computing good edge-labelings2026-03-22T10:38:51ZA good edge-labeling (gel for short) of a graph $G$ is a function $λ: E(G) \to \mathbb{R}$ such that, for any ordered pair of vertices $(x, y)$ of $G$, there do not exist two distinct increasing paths from $x$ to $y$, where ``increasing'' means that the sequence of labels is non-decreasing. This notion was introduced by Bermond et al. [Theor. Comput. Sci. 2013] motivated by practical applications arising from routing and wavelength assignment problems in optical networks. Prompted by the lack of algorithmic results about the problem of deciding whether an input graph admits a gel, called GEL, we initiate its study from the viewpoint of parameterized complexity. We first introduce the natural version of GEL where one wants to use at most $c$ distinct labels, which we call $c$-GEL, and we prove that it is NP-complete for every $c \geq 2$ on very restricted instances. We then provide several positive results, starting with simple polynomial kernels for GEL and $c$-\GEL parameterized by neighborhood diversity or vertex cover. As one of our main technical contributions, we present an FPT algorithm for GEL parameterized by the size of a modulator to a forest of stars, based on a novel approach via a 2-SAT formulation which we believe to be of independent interest. We also present FPT algorithms based on dynamic programming for $c$-GEL parameterized by treewidth and $c$, and for GEL parameterized by treewidth and the maximum degree. Finally, we answer positively a question of Bermond et al. [Theor. Comput. Sci. 2013] by proving the NP-completeness of a problem strongly related to GEL, namely that of deciding whether an input graph admits a so-called UPP-orientation.2024-08-27T16:33:37Z47 pages, 16 figuresDavi de AndradeJúlio AraújoLaure MorelleIgnasi SauAna Silvahttp://arxiv.org/abs/2603.14846v2Lost in Aggregation: On a Fundamental Expressivity Limit of Message-Passing Graph Neural Networks2026-03-22T08:14:20ZWe define a generic class of functions that captures most conceivable aggregations for Message-Passing Graph Neural Networks (MP-GNNs), and prove that any MP-GNN model with such aggregations induces only a polynomial number of equivalence classes on all graphs - while the number of non-isomorphic graphs is doubly-exponential (in number of vertices).
Adding a familiar perspective, we observe that merely 2-iterations of Color Refinement (CR) induce at least an exponential number of equivalence classes, making the aforementioned MP-GNNs relatively infinitely weaker. Previous results state that MP-GNNs match full CR, however they concern a weak, 'non-uniform', notion of distinguishing-power where each graph size may required a different MP-GNN to distinguish graphs up to that size.
Our results concern both distinguishing between non-equivariant vertices and distinguishing between non-isomorphic graphs.2026-03-16T05:45:25ZEran Rosenbluthhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2511.06171v2Halfspaces are hard to test with relative error2026-03-21T21:45:02ZSeveral recent works [DHLNSY25, CPPS25a, CPPS25b] have studied a model of property testing of Boolean functions under a \emph{relative-error} criterion. In this model, the distance from a target function $f: \{0,1\}^n \to \{0,1\}$ that is being tested to a function $g$ is defined relative to the number of inputs $x$ for which $f(x)=1$; moreover, testing algorithms in this model have access both to a black-box oracle for $f$ and to independent uniform satisfying assignments of $f$. The motivation for this model is that it provides a natural framework for testing \emph{sparse} Boolean functions that have few satisfying assignments, analogous to well-studied models for property testing of sparse graphs.
The main result of this paper is a lower bound for testing \emph{halfspaces} (i.e., linear threshold functions) in the relative error model: we show that $\tildeΩ(\log n)$ oracle calls are required for any relative-error halfspace testing algorithm over the Boolean hypercube $\{0,1\}^n$. This stands in sharp contrast both with the constant-query testability (independent of $n$) of halfspaces in the standard model [MORS10], and with the positive results for relative-error testing of many other classes given in [DHLNSY25, CPPS25a, CPPS25b]. Our lower bound for halfspaces gives the first example of a well-studied class of functions for which relative-error testing is provably more difficult than standard-model testing.2025-11-09T00:51:16Z26 pages, appeared in SODA 2026. v2 correct minor typosXi ChenAnindya DeYizhi HuangShivam NadimpalliRocco A. ServedioTianqi Yanghttp://arxiv.org/abs/2602.23809v2Black-Box PWPP Is Not Turing-Closed2026-03-21T18:17:19ZWe establish that adaptive collision-finding queries are strictly more powerful than non-adaptive ones by proving that the complexity class PWPP (Polynomial Weak Pigeonhole Principle) is not closed under adaptive Turing reductions in the black-box setting. Previously, PWPP was known to be closed under non-adaptive Turing reductions (Jeřábek 2016). We demonstrate this black-box separation by introducing the NESTED-COLLISION problem, a natural collision-finding problem defined on a pair of shrinking functions. We show that while this problem is solvable via two adaptive calls to a PWPP oracle, it cannot be solved via an efficient black-box non-adaptive reduction to the canonical PWPP-complete problem COLLISION.2026-02-27T08:47:33ZThis version weakens the main theorem from fully black-box reductions to the decision-tree setting. This change avoids a gap in the earlier formalism while preserving the overall proof strategyPavel Hubáčekhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2601.10693v2Constant-Depth Unitary Preparation of Dicke States2026-03-20T17:29:10ZDicke states serve as a critical resource in quantum metrology, communication, and computation. However, unitary preparation of Dicke states is limited to logarithmic depth in standard circuit models and existing constant-depth protocols require measurement and feed-forward. In this work, we present the first unitary, constant-depth protocols for exact Dicke state preparation. We overcome the logarithmic-depth barrier by moving beyond the standard circuit model and leveraging global interactions (native to architectures such as neutral atoms and trapped ions). Specifically, utilizing unbounded CZ gates (i.e. within the QAC$^0$ circuit class), we offer circuits for exact computation of constant-weight Dicke states, using polynomial ancillae, and approximation of weight-1 Dicke states (i.e. $W$ states), using only constant ancillae. Granted additional access to the quantum FAN-OUT operation (i.e. upgrading to the QAC$_f^0$ circuit class), we also achieve exact and clean preparation of arbitrary-weight Dicke states, with polynomial ancillae. These protocols distinguish the constant-depth capabilities of quantum architectures based on connectivity and offer a novel path toward resolving a long-standing quantum complexity conjecture.2026-01-15T18:51:09ZMalvika Raj JoshiFrancisca Vasconceloshttp://arxiv.org/abs/2603.20070v1The monotonicity of the Franz-Parisi potential is equivalent with Low-degree MMSE lower bounds2026-03-20T15:53:34ZOver the last decades, two distinct approaches have been instrumental to our understanding of the computational complexity of statistical estimation. The statistical physics literature predicts algorithmic hardness through local stability and monotonicity properties of the Franz--Parisi (FP) potential \cite{franz1995recipes,franz1997phase}, while the mathematically rigorous literature characterizes hardness via the limitations of restricted algorithmic classes, most notably low-degree polynomial estimators \cite{hopkins2017efficient}. For many inference models, these two perspectives yield strikingly consistent predictions, giving rise to a long-standing open problem of establishing a precise mathematical relationship between them. In this work, we show that for estimation problems the power of low-degree polynomials is equivalent to the monotonicity of the annealed FP potential for a broad family of Gaussian additive models (GAMs) with signal-to-noise ratio $λ$. In particular, subject to a low-degree conjecture for GAMs, our results imply that the polynomial-time limits of these models are directly implied by the monotonicity of the annealed FP potential, in conceptual agreement with predictions from the physics literature dating back to the 1990s.2026-03-20T15:53:34Z92 pagesKonstantinos TsirkasLeda WangIlias Zadikhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2603.20038v1Search-Driven Clause Learning for Product-State Quantum $k$-SAT (PRODSAT-QSAT)2026-03-20T15:22:27ZWe study PRODSAT-QSAT($k$): given rank-one $k$-local projectors, determine whether a quantum $k$-SAT instance admits a satisfying product state. We present a CDCL-style refutation framework that searches a finite partition of each qubit's Bloch sphere while a sound theory solver checks region feasibility using a geometric overapproximation of the projection amplitudes for each constraint. When the theory solver proves that no state in a region can satisfy a constraint, it produces a sound conflict clause that blocks that region; accumulated blocking clauses can yield a global result of product-state unsatisfiability (UN-PRODSAT). We formalise the problem, prove the soundness of the clause-learning rule, and describe a practical algorithm and implementation.2026-03-20T15:22:27Z17 pages plus references, 3 figures, 2 tables,Samuel González-CastilloJoon Hyung LeeAlfons Laarman