https://arxiv.org/api/Ysyd6E42BfZyaMCW9zo2qM6opdE2026-06-11T09:11:01Z1294049515http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.28265v1Fine-Grained Complexity of Continuous Euclidean k-Center2026-03-30T10:48:22ZIn the (continuous) Euclidean $k$-center problem, given $n$ points in $\mathbb{R}^d$ and an integer $k$, the goal is to find $k$ center points in $\mathbb{R}^d$ that minimize the maximum Euclidean distance from any input point to its closest center. In this paper, we establish conditional lower bounds for this problem in constant dimensions in two settings.
$\bullet$ Parameterized by $k$: Assuming the Exponential Time Hypothesis (ETH), we show that there is no $f(k)n^{o(k^{1-1/d})}$-time algorithm for the Euclidean $k$-center problem. This result shows that the algorithm of Agarwal and Procopiuc [SODA 1998; Algorithmica 2002] is essentially optimal. Furthermore, our lower bound rules out any $(1+\varepsilon)$-approximation algorithm running in time $(k/\varepsilon)^{o(k^{1-1/d})}n^{O(1)}$, thereby establishing near-optimality of the corresponding approximation scheme by the same authors.
$\bullet$ Small $k$: Assuming the 3-SUM hypothesis, we prove that for any $\varepsilon>0$ there is no $O(n^{2-\varepsilon})$-time algorithm for the Euclidean $2$-center problem in $\mathbb{R}^3$. This settles an open question posed by Agarwal, Ben Avraham, and Sharir [SoCG 2010; Computational Geometry 2013]. In addition, under the same hypothesis, we prove that for any $\varepsilon > 0$, the Euclidean $6$-center problem in $\mathbb{R}^2$ also admits no $O(n^{2-\varepsilon})$-time algorithm.
The technical core of all our proofs is a novel geometric embedding of a system of linear equations. We construct a point set where each variable corresponds to a specific collection of points, and the geometric structure ensures that a small-radius clustering is possible if and only if the system has a valid solution.2026-03-30T10:48:22ZLotte BlankKarl BringmannParinya ChalermsookKarthik C. S.Benedikt KolbeHung LeGeert van Wordragenhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2604.20874v1The Root Theorem of Context Engineering2026-03-29T20:41:58ZEvery system that maintains a large language model conversation beyond a single session faces two inescapable constraints: the context window is finite, and information quality degrades with accumulated volume. We formalize these constraints as axioms and derive a single governing principle -- the Root Theorem of Context Engineering: \emph{maximize signal-to-token ratio within bounded, lossy channels.} From this principle, we derive five consequences without additional assumptions: (1)~a quality function $F(P)$ that degrades monotonically with injected token volume, independent of window size; (2)~the independence of signal and token count as optimization variables; (3)~a necessary gate mechanism triggered by fidelity thresholds, not capacity limits; (4)~the inevitability of homeostatic persistence -- accumulate, compress, rewrite, shed -- as the only architecture that sustains understanding indefinitely; and (5)~the self-referential property that the compression mechanism operates inside the channel it compresses, requiring an external verification gate. We show that append-only systems necessarily exceed their effective window in finite time, that retrieval-augmented generation solves search but not continuity, and that the theorem's constraint structure converges with biological memory architecture through independent derivation from shared principles. Engineering proof is provided through a 60+-session persistent architecture demonstrating stable memory footprint under continuous operation -- the divergence prediction made concrete. The Root Theorem establishes context engineering as an information-theoretic discipline with formal foundations, distinct from prompt engineering in both scope and method. Shannon solved point-to-point transmission. Context engineering solves continuity.2026-03-29T20:41:58Z17 pages, 2 figuresBorja Odriozola Schickhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2603.27655v1Exact Algorithms for Edge Deletion to Cactus2026-03-29T12:14:23ZWe study two related problems on simple, un-directed graphs: Edge Deletion to Cactus and Spanning Tree to Cactus. Edge Deletion to Cactus has been known to be NP-hard on general graphs at least since 1988. We show improved exact algorithms for the former and a polynomial time algorithm for the latter.2026-03-29T12:14:23ZSheikh Shakil AkhtarGeevarghese Philiphttp://arxiv.org/abs/2511.04125v2SVP$_p$ is Deterministically NP-Hard for all $p > 2$, Even to Approximate Within a Factor of $2^{\log^{1-\varepsilon} n}$2026-03-29T02:16:03ZWe prove that SVP$_p$ is NP-hard to approximate within a factor of $2^{\log^{1 - \varepsilon} n}$, for all constants $\varepsilon > 0$ and $p > 2$, under standard deterministic Karp reductions. This result is also the first proof that \emph{exact} SVP$_p$ is NP-hard in a finite $\ell_p$ norm. Hardness for SVP$_p$ with $p$ finite was previously only known if NP $\not \subseteq$ RP, and under that assumption, hardness of approximation was only known for all constant factors. As a corollary to our main theorem, we show that under the Sliding Scale Conjecture, SVP$_p$ is NP-hard to approximate within a small polynomial factor, for all constants $p > 2$.
Our proof techniques are surprisingly elementary; we reduce from a \emph{regularized} PCP instance directly to the shortest vector problem by using simple gadgets related to Vandermonde matrices and Hadamard matrices.2025-11-06T07:18:14ZIsaac M. HairAmit Sahaihttp://arxiv.org/abs/2603.27398v1NP-hardness of SVP in Euclidean Space2026-03-28T20:33:18Zvan Emde Boas (1981) conjectured that computing a shortest non-zero vector of a lattice in an Euclidean space is NP-hard. In this paper, we prove that this conjecture is true and hence de-randomize the classical randomness result of Ajtai (1998). Our proof builds on the construction of Bennet-Peifert (2023) on locally dense lattices via Reed-Solomon codes, and depends crucially on the work of Deligne on the Weil conjectures for higher dimensional varieties over finite fields.2026-03-28T20:33:18Z23 pages. Comments welcome!Daqing Wanhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2603.02656v2Quantum Algorithms for Approximate Graph Isomorphism Testing2026-03-28T04:47:28ZThe graph isomorphism problem asks whether two graphs are identical up to vertex relabeling. While the exact problem admits quasi-polynomial-time classical algorithms, many applications in molecular comparison, noisy network analysis, and pattern recognition require a flexible notion of structural similarity. We study the quantum query complexity of approximate graph isomorphism testing, where two graphs on $n$ vertices drawn from the Erdős--Rényi distribution $\mathcal{G} (n,1/2)$ are considered approximately isomorphic if they can be made isomorphic by at most $k$ edge edits.
We present a quantum algorithm based on MNRS quantum walk search over the product graph $Γ(G,H)$ of the two input graphs. When the graphs are approximately isomorphic, the quantum walk search detects vertex pairs belonging to a dense near isomorphic matching set; candidate pairings are then reconstructed via local consistency propagation and verified via a Grover-accelerated consistency check. We prove that this approach achieves query complexity $\mathcal{O}(n^{3/2} \log n/\varepsilon)$, where $\varepsilon$ parameterizes the approximation threshold. We complement this with an $Ω(n^2)$ classical lower bound for constant approximation, establishing a genuine polynomial quantum speedup in the query model.
We extend the framework to spectral similarity measures based on graph Laplacian eigenvalues, as well as weighted and attributed graphs. Small-scale simulation results on quantum simulators for graphs with up to twenty vertices demonstrate compatibility with near-term quantum devices.2026-03-03T06:43:41Z36 pages. Revised lower bound proofPrateek P. Kulkarnihttp://arxiv.org/abs/2603.27128v1Random tensor isomorphism under orthogonal and unitary actions2026-03-28T04:34:48ZWe study the problem of testing whether two tensors in $\mathbb{R}^\ell\otimes \mathbb{R}^m\otimes \mathbb{R}^n$ are isomorphic under the natural action of orthogonal groups $\textbf{O}(\ell, \mathbb{R})\times\textbf{O}(m, \mathbb{R})\times\textbf{O}(n, \mathbb{R})$, as well as the corresponding question over $\mathbb{C}$ and unitary groups. These problems naturally arise in several areas, including graph and tensor isomorphism (Grochow--Qiao, SIAM J. Comp. '21), scaling algorithms for orbit closure intersections (Allen-Zhu--Garg--Li--Oliveira--Wigderson, STOC '18), and quantum information (Liu--Li--Li--Qiao, Phys. Rev. Lett. '12).
We study average-case algorithms for orthogonal and unitary tensor isomorphism, with one random tensor where each entry is sampled uniformly independently from a sub-Gaussian distribution, and the other arbitrary. For the algorithm design, we develop algorithmic ideas from the higher-order singular value approach into polynomial-time exact (algebraic) and approximate (numerical) algorithms with rigorous average-case analyses. Following (Allen-Zhu--Garg--Li--Oliveira--Wigderson, STOC '18), we present an algorithm for a gapped version of the orbit distance approximation problem. For the average-case analysis, we work from recent progress in random matrix theory on eigenvalue repulsion of sub-Gaussian Wishart matrices (Christoffersen--Luh--O'Rourke--Shearer and Han, arXiv '25) by extending their results from side lengths of Wishart matrices linearly related to polynomially related.2026-03-28T04:34:48Z56 pages, 0 figuresJeremy ChizewerSamuel EverettDeven MithalYouming Qiaohttp://arxiv.org/abs/2603.26947v1The Ice Sheet State and Parameter Estimator (ICESEE) Library (v1.0.0): Ensemble Kalman Filtering for Ice Sheet Models2026-03-27T19:36:19ZICESEE (ICE Sheet statE and parameter Estimator) is a Python-based, open-source data assimilation framework designed for seamless integration with ice sheet and Earth system models. It implements a parallel Ensemble Kalman Filter (EnKF) with full MPI support for scalable assimilation in state and parameter spaces. ICESEE uses a matrix-free update scheme from Evensen (2003), which avoids explicit forecast error covariance construction and eliminates the need for localization in high-dimensional, nonlinear systems. ICESEE also supports four EnKF variants, including a localized version for methodological testing. It enables indirect inference of unobserved model parameters through a hybrid assimilation-inversion strategy. The framework features modular coupling interfaces, adaptive state indexing, and efficient parallel I/O, making it extensible to a variety of modeling environments. ICESEE has been successfully coupled with ISSM, Icepack, and other models. In this study, we focus on applications with ISSM and Icepack, demonstrating ICESEE's interoperability, performance, scalability, and ability to improve state estimates and infer uncertain parameters. Performance benchmarks show strong and weak scaling, highlighting ICESEE's potential for large-scale, observation-constrained ice sheet reanalyses.2026-03-27T19:36:19Z39 pages, 10 figures, and 2 tables. It is a model description paperBrian KyanjoTalea L. MayoAlexander A. Robelhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2604.16390v1Dual-Tape Perspective and Generator Independence: The Algebraic Foundation of Real Boolean Turing Machines2026-03-27T13:29:23ZThe Complex Boolean Turing Machine (CBTM) characterizes non-deterministic computation using the abstract generator $α$, but the abstractness of $α$ makes it difficult to understand intuitively. In this paper, by concretizing $α$ as the algebraic number $\sqrt{2}$, we introduce the \textbf{Real Boolean Turing Machine (RBTM)} and propose the \textbf{dual-tape perspective}, decomposing each tape into a real tape (storing rational coefficients $a$) and an imaginary tape (storing irrational coefficients $b$). The ``1''s on the imaginary tape intuitively mark the locations of ``new dimensions,'' laying a physical foundation for subsequent dynamic dimension tracking. More importantly, we prove the \textbf{Generator Independence Theorem}: computational power is independent of the specific choice of generator, whether using $\sqrt{2}$, $\sqrt{3}$, or the imaginary unit $i$, the corresponding automata are isomorphic. This reveals that the essence of non-determinism lies in the fact of ``introducing a new element incommensurable with the base field,'' rather than the algebraic identity of the generator. Furthermore, we introduce the \textbf{generator extraction operator} and analyze its limitations within a static framework, highlighting the necessity of introducing a dynamic IVM. The RBTM serves both as a visualized instance of the CBTM and as a bridge to the subsequent dynamic dimension tracking of the Imaginary-part Verification Machine(IVM).2026-03-27T13:29:23ZJingwen ZhengBojin ZhengWeiwu Wanghttp://arxiv.org/abs/2604.16389v1Complex Boolean Turing Machines: An Algebraic Semantic Framework for Computational Complexity2026-03-27T13:11:09ZTraditional Turing machines are semantically poor, they only concern the syntactic manipulation of symbols, discarding the mathematical semantics behind the symbols. This semantic deficiency is considered the root cause of the three major barriers: relativization, natural proofs, and algebrization. This paper proposes the Complex Boolean Turing Machine (CBTM), elevating computational symbols to algebraic elements in $\mathrm{GF}(4)$, so that each operation has a clear mathematical interpretation. The core insight of the CBTM is: \textbf{Non-deterministic computation corresponds to algebraic field extension}, when reading a symbol representing a new dimension, the computation must branch into two paths, just as introducing a new element $α$ into the field $\mathbb{Q}$ yields the extension $\mathbb{Q}(α)$. We separate old data from new dimensions via the projection operators $\mathfrak{Re}$ and $\mathfrak{Im}$, and introduce a dual-tape perspective to intuitively decompose abstract algebraic symbols into a real tape (deterministic computation) and an imaginary tape (non-deterministic control). Moreover, the algebraic semantics of the CBTM naturally support arbitrary $k$-way non-determinism: by introducing multiple new dimensions, we can generate high-dimensional algebraic extensions $\mathbb{Q}(α_1,\dots,α_d)$, whose dimension $2^d$ corresponds exactly to the number of branches. We prove that the CBTM is polynomially equivalent to classical Turing machines and non-deterministic Turing machines, with $\mathbf{P}_{cb}=\mathbf{P}$ and $\mathbf{NP}_{cb}=\mathbf{NP}$. Thus, the CBTM does not introduce hyper-computation but provides a new algebraic perspective for understanding the essence of non-determinism. This work serves as the computational model foundation for the series of papers.2026-03-27T13:11:09ZBojin ZhengJingwen ZhengWeiwu Wanghttp://arxiv.org/abs/2603.26286v1Proofdoors and Efficiency of CDCL Solvers2026-03-27T10:53:23ZWe propose a new parameter called proofdoor in an attempt to explain the efficiency of CDCL SAT solvers over formulas derived from circuit (esp., arithmetic) verification applications. Informally, given an unsatisfiable CNF formula F over n variables, a proofdoor decomposition consists of a chunking of the clauses into A1, . . . , Ak together with a sequence of interpolants connecting these chunks. Intuitively, a proofdoor captures the idea that an unsatisfiable formula can be refuted by reasoning chunk by chunk, while maintaining only a summary of the information (i.e., interpolants) gained so far for subsequent reasoning steps.
We prove several theorems in support of the proposition that proofdoors can explain the efficiency of CDCL solvers for some class of circuit verification problems. First, we show that formulas with small proofdoors (i.e., where each interpolant is O(n) sized, each chunk Ai has small pathwidth, and each interpolant clause has at most O(log(n)) backward dependency on the previous interpolant) have short resolution (Res) proofs. Second, we show that certain configurations of CDCL solvers can compute such proofs in time polynomial in n. Third, we show that commutativity (miter) formulas over floating-point addition have small proofdoors and hence short Res proofs, even though they have large pathwidth. Fourth, we characterize the limits of the proofdoor framework by connecting proofdoors to the partially ordered resolution proof system: we show that a poor decomposition of arithmetic miter instances can force exponentially large partially ordered resolution proofs, even when a different decomposition (i.e., small proofdoors) permits short proofs.2026-03-27T10:53:23ZSubmitted to SAT 2026. 15 pages + appendixSunidhi SinghVincent LiewMarc VinyalsVijay Ganeshhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2303.14605v5The Subspace Flatness Conjecture and Faster Integer Programming2026-03-27T06:14:01ZIn a seminal paper, Kannan and Lovász (1988) considered a quantity $μ_{KL}(Λ,K)$ which denotes the best volume-based lower bound on the covering radius $μ(Λ,K)$ of a convex body $K$ with respect to a lattice $Λ$. Kannan and Lovász proved that $μ(Λ,K) \leq n \cdot μ_{KL}(Λ,K)$ and the Subspace Flatness Conjecture by Dadush (2012) claims a $O(\log(2n))$ factor suffices, which would match the lower bound from the work of Kannan and Lovász.
We settle this conjecture up to a constant in the exponent by proving that $μ(Λ,K) \leq O(\log^{3}(2n)) \cdot μ_{KL} (Λ,K)$. Our proof is based on the Reverse Minkowski Theorem due to Regev and Stephens-Davidowitz (2017). Following the work of Dadush (2012, 2019), we obtain a $(\log(2n))^{O(n)}$-time randomized algorithm to solve integer programs in $n$ variables. Another implication of our main result is a near-optimal flatness constant of $O(n \log^{2}(2n))$, improving on the previous bound of $O(n^{4/3} \log^{O(1)} (2n))$.2023-03-26T02:27:13Z49 pagesVictor ReisThomas Rothvosshttp://arxiv.org/abs/2202.04246v5On the Keevash-Knox-Mycroft Conjecture2026-03-27T05:51:58ZGiven $1\le \ell <k$ and $δ\ge0$, let $\textbf{PM}(k,\ell,δ)$ be the decision problem for the existence of perfect matchings in $n$-vertex $k$-uniform hypergraphs with minimum $\ell$-degree at least $δ\binom{n-\ell}{k-\ell}$. For $k\ge 3$, $\textbf{PM}(k,\ell,0)$ was one of the first NP-complete problems by Karp. Keevash, Knox and Mycroft conjectured that $\textbf{PM}(k, \ell, δ)$ is in P for every $δ> 1-(1-1/k)^{k-\ell}$ and verified the case $\ell=k-1$.
In this paper we show that this problem can be reduced to the study of the minimum $\ell$-degree condition forcing the existence of fractional perfect matchings. Together with existing results on fractional perfect matchings, this solves the conjecture of Keevash, Knox and Mycroft for $\ell\ge 0.4k$. Moreover, we also supply an algorithm that outputs a perfect matching, provided that one exists.2022-02-09T03:07:21Zv1 is the conference version; v2, v3 are the journal versions; v4 is the final (full) version; v5 post-publication version: added Proposition 4.1 to correct a falsely claimed upper bound on the order of the coset groupJCTB, 174(2025), 214-242Luyining GanJie Hanhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2603.25914v1An $Ω( (\log n / \log \log n)^2 )$ Cell-Probe Lower Bound for Dynamic Boolean Data Structures2026-03-26T21:10:26ZWe resolve the long-standing open problem of Boolean dynamic data structure hardness, proving an unconditional lower bound of $Ω((\log n / \log\log n)^2)$ for the Multiphase Problem of Patrascu [STOC 2010] (instantiated with Inner Product over $\mathbb{F}_2$). This matches the celebrated barrier for weighted problems established by Larsen [STOC 2012] and closes the gap left by the $Ω(\log^{1.5} n)$ Boolean bound of Larsen, Weinstein, and Yu [STOC 2018].
The previous barrier was methodological: all prior works relied on ``one-way'' communication games, where the inability to verify query simulations necessitated complex machinery (such as the Peak-to-Average Lemma) that hit a hard ceiling at $\log^{1.5} n$.
Our key contribution is conceptual: We introduce a 2.5-round Multiphase Communication Game that augments the standard one-way model with a verification round, where Bob confirms the consistency of Alice's simulation against the actual memory. This simple, qualitative change allows us to bypass technical barriers and obtain the optimal bound directly. As a consequence, our analysis naturally extends to other hard Boolean functions, offering a general recipe for translating discrepancy lower bounds into $Ω((\log n / \log\log n)^2)$ dynamic Boolean data structure lower bounds.
We also argue that this result likely represents the structural ceiling of the Chronogram framework initiated by Fredman and Saks [STOC 1989]: any $ω(\log^2 n)$ lower bound would require either fundamentally new techniques or major circuit complexity breakthroughs.2026-03-26T21:10:26Z33 pages, 3 figuresYoung Kun Kohttp://arxiv.org/abs/2505.08951v2Sensitivity and Hamming graphs2026-03-26T17:50:24ZFor any $m\geq 3$ we show that the Hamming graph $H(n,m)$ admits an imbalanced partition into $m$ sets, each inducing a subgraph of low maximum degree. This improves previous results by Tandya and by Potechin and Tsang, and disproves the Strong $m$-ary Sensitivity Conjecture of Asensio, García-Marco, and Knauer. On the other hand, we prove their weaker $m$-ary Sensitivity Conjecture by showing that the sensitivity of any $m$-ary function is bounded from below by a polynomial expression in its degree.2025-05-13T20:28:55Z8 pages, 1 figureSara AsensioYuval FilmusIgnacio García-MarcoKolja Knauer