Toward a Uniform Algorithm and Uniform Reduction for Constraint Problems

2026-04-07T18:15:59Z

We develop a unified framework to characterize the power of higher-level algorithms for the constraint satisfaction problem (CSP), such as $k$-consistency, the Sherali-Adams LP hierarchy, and the affine IP hierarchy. As a result, solvability of a fixed-template CSP or, more generally, a Promise CSP by a given level is shown to depend only on the polymorphism minion of the template. Similarly, we obtain a minion-theoretic description of $k$-consistency reductions between Promise CSPs. We introduce a new hierarchy of SDP-like vector relaxations with vectors over $\mathbb Z_{p}$ in which orthogonality is imposed on $k$-tuples of vectors. Surprisingly, this relaxation turns out to be equivalent to the $k$-th level of the AIP-$\mathbb{Z}_p$ relaxation. We show that it solves the CSP of the dihedral group $\mathbf{D}_4$, the smallest CSP that fools the singleton BLP+AIP algorithm. Using this vector representation, we further show that the $p$-th level of the $\mathbb{Z}_p$ relaxation solves linear equations modulo $p^2$.

Computational relative entropy

2026-04-07T17:34:38Z

Our capacity to process information depends on the computational power at our disposal. Information theory captures our ability to distinguish states or communicate messages when it is unconstrained with unrivaled beauty and elegance. For computationally bounded observers the situation is quite different -- they can, for example, be fooled to believe that distributions are more random than they actually are. In our work, we build a new foundation for a computational quantum information theory that captures the essence of complexity-constrained information theory while retaining the look and feel of the unbounded asymptotic theory. As our fundamental quantity, we define the computational relative entropy as the optimal error exponent in asymmetric hypothesis testing when restricted to polynomially many copies and quantum gates, defined in a mathematically rigorous way. Building on this foundation, we prove a computational analogue of Stein's lemma, establish computational versions of fundamental inequalities like Pinsker's bound, and demonstrate a computational smoothing property showing that computationally indistinguishable states yield equivalent information measures. We derive a computational entropy that operationally characterizes optimal compression rates for quantum states under computational limitations and show that our quantities apply to computational entanglement theory, proving a computational version of the Rains bound. Our framework reveals striking separations between computational and unbounded information measures, including quantum-classical gaps that arise from cryptographic assumptions, demonstrating that computational constraints fundamentally alter the information-theoretic landscape and open new research directions at the intersection of quantum information, complexity theory, and cryptography.

Graph-Theoretic Analysis of Phase Optimization Complexity in Variational Wave Functions for Heisenberg Antiferromagnets

2026-04-07T17:08:16Z

We study the computational complexity of learning the ground state phase structure of Heisenberg antiferromagnets. Representing Hilbert space as a weighted graph, the variational energy defines a weighted XY model that, for $\mathbb{Z}_2$ phases, reduces to a classical antiferromagnetic Ising model on that graph. For fixed amplitudes, reconstructing the signs of the ground state wavefunction thus reduces to a weighted Max-Cut instance. This establishes that ground state phase reconstruction for Heisenberg antiferromagnets is worst-case NP-hard and links the task to combinatorial optimization.

Supersimulators

2026-04-07T14:52:11Z

We prove that every randomized Boolean function admits a supersimulator: a randomized polynomial-size circuit whose output on random inputs cannot be efficiently distinguished from reality with constant advantage, even by polynomially larger distinguishers. Our result builds on the landmark complexity-theoretic regularity lemma of Trevisan, Tulsiani and Vadhan (2009), which, in contrast, provides a simulator that fools smaller distinguishers. We circumvent lower bounds for the simulator size by letting the distinguisher size bound vary with the target function, while remaining below an absolute upper bound independent of the target function. This dependence on the target function arises naturally from our use of an iteration technique originating in the graph regularity literature. The simulators provided by the regularity lemma and recent refinements thereof, known as multiaccurate and multicalibrated predictors, respectively, as per Hebert-Johnson et al. (2018), have previously been shown to have myriad applications in complexity theory, cryptography, learning theory, and beyond. We first show that a recent multicalibration-based characterization of the computational indistinguishability of product distributions actually requires only (calibrated) multiaccuracy. We then show that supersimulators yield an even tighter result in this application domain, closing a complexity gap present in prior versions of the characterization.

Computational hardness of estimating quantum entropies via binary entropy bounds

2026-04-07T12:47:58Z

We investigate the computational hardness of estimating the quantum $α$-Rényi entropy ${\rm S}^{\tt R}_α(ρ) = \frac{\ln {\rm Tr}(ρ^α)}{1-α}$ and the quantum $q$-Tsallis entropy ${\rm S}^{\tt T}_q(ρ) = \frac{1-{\rm Tr}(ρ^q)}{q-1}$, both of which converge to the von Neumann entropy as the order approaches $1$. The promise problems Quantum $α$-Rényi Entropy Approximation (RényiQEA$_α$) and Quantum $q$-Tsallis Entropy Approximation (TsallisQEA$_q$) ask whether $ {\rm S}^ {\tt R}_α(ρ)$ or ${\rm S}^{\tt T}_q(ρ)$, is at least $τ_1$ or at most $τ_2$, where $τ_1 - τ_2$ is typically a positive constant. Previous hardness results cover only the von Neumann entropy (order $1$) and some cases of the quantum $q$-Tsallis entropy, while existing approaches do not readily extend to other orders. We establish that for all positive real $α$ and $q$, and also for $α=\infty$, the rank-$2$ variants Rank2RényiQEA$_α$ and Rank2TsallisQEA$_q$ are BQP-hard. Combined with prior (rank-dependent) quantum query algorithms in Wang, Guan, Liu, Zhang, and Ying (TIT 2024), Wang, Zhang, and Li (TIT 2024), and Liu and Wang (SODA 2025), as well as the one derived from O'Donnell and Wright (STOC 2016), our results imply: - For all real orders $α> 0$ or $α=\infty$, and for all real orders $0 < q \leq 1$, LowRankRényiQEA$_α$ and LowRankTsallisQEA$_q$ are BQP-complete, where both are restricted versions of RényiQEA$_α$ and TsallisQEA$_q$ with $ρ$ of polynomial rank. - For all real order $q>1$, TsallisQEA$_q$ is BQP-complete. Our hardness results stem from reductions based on new inequalities relating the $α$-Rényi or $q$-Tsallis binary entropies of different orders. These reductions differ substantially from previous approaches, and the inequalities are of independent interest.

Parameterized complexity of the f-Critical Set problem

2026-04-07T11:58:26Z

Given a graph $G=(V,E)$, and a function $f:V(G) \rightarrow \mathbb{N}$, an $f$-reversible process on $G$ is a dynamical system such that, given an initial vertex labeling $c_0 : V(G) \rightarrow \{0,1\}$, every vertex $v$ changes its label if and only if it has at least $f(v)$ neighbors with the opposite label. The updates occur synchronously in discrete time steps $t=0,1,2,\ldots$. An $f$-critical set of $G$ is a subset of vertices of $G$ whose initial label is $1$ such that, in an $f$-reversible process on $G$, all vertices reach label $1$ within one time step and then remain unchanged. The critical set number $r^c_f(G)$ is the minimum size of an $f$-critical set of $G$. Given a graph $G$, a threshold function $f$, and an integer $k$, the $f$-Critical Set problem asks whether $r^c_f(G) \leq k$. We prove that this problem is NP-complete for planar subcubic bipartite graphs with maximum threshold $m(f) = 2$ and W[1]-hard when parameterized by the treewidth $tw(G)$ of $G$. Additionally, we show that the problem is FPT when parameterized by $tw(G)+m(f)$, $tw(G)+Δ(G)$, and $k$, where $Δ(G)$ denotes the maximum degree of $G$. Finally, we present two kernels of sizes $O(k \cdot m(f))$ and $O(k \cdot Δ(G))$.

Selecting a Maximum Solow-Polasky Diversity Subset in General Metric Spaces Is NP-hard

2026-04-07T06:37:40Z

The Solow--Polasky diversity indicator (or magnitude) is a classical measure of diversity based on pairwise distances. It has applications in ecology, conservation planning, and, more recently, in algorithmic subset selection and diversity optimization. In this note, we investigate the computational complexity of selecting a subset of fixed cardinality from a finite set so as to maximize the Solow--Polasky diversity value. We prove that this problem is NP-hard in general metric spaces. The reduction is from the classical Independent Set problem and uses a simple metric construction containing only two non-zero distance values. Importantly, the hardness result holds for every fixed kernel parameter $θ_0>0$; equivalently, by rescaling the metric, one may fix the parameter to $1$ without loss of generality. A central point is that this is not a boilerplate reduction: because the Solow--Polasky objective is defined through matrix inversion, it is a nontrivial nonlinear function of the distances. Accordingly, the proof requires a dedicated strict-monotonicity argument for the specific family of distance matrices arising in the reduction; this strict monotonicity is established here for that family, but it is not assumed to hold in full generality. We also explain how the proof connects to continuity and monotonicity considerations for diversity indicators.

SMB algebras II: On the Constraint Satisfaction Problem over Semilattices of Mal'cev Blocks

2026-04-06T20:47:05Z

We define a class of algebras, the semilattices of Mal'cev blocks (for short, SMB algebras). In a nutshell, these algebras are semilattices in which each element gets blown up into a Mal'cev algebra. We publish for the first time our old proofs that some SMB algebras induce tractable templates of the reprove that the Constraint Satisfaction Problem. Next, we reprove that, in fact, all SMB algebras induce tractable templates of the Constraint Satisfaction Problem, a result already proved by A. Bulatov. Also, we compare the two general proofs of the CSP Dichotomy and prove they are more similar than initially thought when they are applied to SMB algebras. This paper is the second in the series of papers investigating the SMB algebras and it is a precursor to our further research on the similarities between the proofs of the Dichotomy Theorem.

Jaguar: A Primal Algorithm for Conjunctive Query Evaluation in Submodular-Width Time

2026-04-06T19:18:12Z

The submodular width is a complexity measure of conjunctive queries (CQs), which assigns a nonnegative real number, subw(Q), to each CQ Q. An existing algorithm, called PAND, performs CQ evaluation in polynomial time where the exponent is essentially subw(Q). Formally, for every Boolean CQ Q, PANDA evaluates Q in time $O(N^{\mathsf{subw}(Q)} \cdot \mathsf{polylog}(N))$, where N denotes the input size; moreover, there is complexity-theoretic evidence that, for a number of Boolean CQs, no exponent strictly below subw(Q) can be achieved by combinatorial algorithms. On a high level, the submodular width of a CQ Q can be described as the maximum over all polymatroids, which are set functions on the variables of Q that satisfy Shannon inequalities. The PANDA algorithm in a sense works in the dual space of this maximization problem, makes use of information theory, and transforms a CQ into a set of disjunctive datalog programs which are individually solved. In this article, we introduce a new algorithm for CQ evaluation which achieves, for each Boolean CQ Q and for all epsilon > 0, a running time of $O(N^{\mathsf{subw}(Q)+ε})$. This new algorithm's description and analysis are, in our view, significantly simpler than those of PANDA. We refer to it as a "primal" algorithm as it operates in the primal space of the described maximization problem, by maintaining a feasible primal solution, namely, a polymatroid. Indeed, this algorithm deals directly with the input CQ and adaptively computes a sequence of joins, in a guided fashion, so that the cost of these join computations is bounded. Additionally, this algorithm can achieve the stated runtime for the generalization of the submodular width incorporating degree constraints. We dub our algorithm Jaguar, as it is a join-adaptive guided algorithm.

On the Complexity of Determinations

2026-04-06T19:12:04Z

Classical complexity theory measures the cost of computing a function, but many computational tasks require committing to one valid output among several. We introduce determination depth -- the minimum number of sequential layers of irrevocable commitments needed to select a single valid output -- and show that no amount of computation can eliminate this cost. We exhibit relational tasks whose commitments are constant-time table lookups yet require exponential parallel width to compensate for any reduction in depth. A conservation law shows that enriching commitments merely relabels determination layers as circuit depth, preserving the total sequential cost. For circuit-encoded specifications, the resulting depth hierarchy captures the polynomial hierarchy ($Σ_{2k}^P$-complete for each fixed $k$, PSPACE-complete for unbounded $k$). In the online setting, determination depth is fully irreducible: unlimited computation between commitment layers cannot reduce their number.

Efficient and Private Property Testing via Indistinguishability

2026-04-06T17:06:22Z

Given a small random sample of $n$-bit strings labeled by an unknown Boolean function, which properties of this function can be tested computationally efficiently? We show an equivalence between properties that are efficiently testable from few samples and properties with structured symmetry, which depend only on the function's average values on an efficiently computable partition of the domain. Without the efficiency constraint, a similar characterization in terms of unstructured symmetry was obtained by Blais and Yoshida (2019). We also give a function testing analogue of the classic characterization of testable graph properties in terms of regular partitions, as well as a sublinear time and differentially private algorithm to compute concise summaries of such partitions of graphs. Finally, we tighten a recent characterization of the computational indistinguishability of product distributions, which encompasses the related task of efficiently testing which of two candidate functions labeled the observed samples. Essential to our proofs is the following observation of independent interest: Every randomized Boolean function, no matter how complex, admits a supersimulator: a randomized polynomial-size circuit whose output on random inputs cannot be efficiently distinguished from reality with constant advantage, even by polynomially larger distinguishers. This surprising fact is implicit in a theorem of Dwork et al. (2021) in the context of algorithmic fairness, but its complexity-theoretic implications were not previously explored. We give a new proof of this lemma using an iteration technique from the graph regularity literature, and we observe that a subtle quantifier switch allows it to powerfully circumvent known barriers to improving the landmark complexity-theoretic regularity lemma of Trevisan, Tulsiani, and Vadhan (2009).

Optimal Lower Bounds for Symmetric Modular Circuits

2026-04-06T15:27:26Z

A notorious open question in circuit complexity is whether Boolean operations of arbitrary arity can efficiently be expressed using modular counting gates only. Håstad's celebrated switching lemma yields exponential lower bounds for the dual problem - realising modular arithmetic with Boolean gates - but, a similar lower bound for modular circuits computing the Boolean AND function has remained elusive for almost 30 years. We solve this problem for the restricted model of symmetric circuits: We consider MOD$_m$-circuits of arbitrary depth, and for an arbitrary modulus $m \in \mathbb{N}$, and obtain subexponential lower bounds for computing the $n$-ary Boolean AND function, under the assumption that the circuits are syntactically symmetric under all permutations of their $n$ input gates. This lower bound is matched precisely by a construction due to (Idziak, Kawałek, Krzaczkowski, LICS'22), leading to the surprising conclusion that the optimal symmetric circuit size is already achieved with depth $2$. Motivated by another construction from (LICS'22), which achieves smaller size at the cost of greater depth, we also prove tight size lower bounds for circuits with a more liberal notion of symmetry characterised by a nested block structure on the input variables.

Deterministic Hardness of Approximation For SVP in all Finite $\ell_p$ Norms

2026-04-06T12:08:10Z

We show that, assuming NP $\not\subseteq$ $\cap_{δ> 0}$DTIME$\left(\exp{n^δ}\right)$, the shortest vector problem for lattices of rank $n$ in any finite $\ell_p$ norm is hard to approximate within a factor of $2^{(\log n)^{1 - o(1)}}$, via a deterministic reduction. Previously, for the Euclidean case $p=2$, even hardness of the exact shortest vector problem was not known under a deterministic reduction.

On the Need for (Quantum) Memory with Short Outputs

2026-04-06T09:42:49Z

In this work, we establish the first separation between computation with bounded and unbounded space, for problems with short outputs (i.e., working memory can be exponentially larger than output size), both in the classical and the quantum setting. Towards that, we introduce a problem called nested collision finding, and show that optimal query complexity can not be achieved without exponential memory. Our result is based on a novel ``two-oracle recording'' technique, where one oracle ``records'' the computation's long outputs under the other oracle, effectively reducing the time-space trade-off for short-output problems to that of long-output problems. We believe this technique will be of independent interest for establishing time-space tradeoffs in other short-output settings.

Learning from Equivalence Queries, Revisited

2026-04-06T08:55:41Z

Modern machine learning systems, such as generative models and recommendation systems, often evolve through a cycle of deployment, user interaction, and periodic model updates. This differs from standard supervised learning frameworks, which focus on loss or regret minimization over a fixed sequence of prediction tasks. Motivated by this setting, we revisit the classical model of learning from equivalence queries, introduced by Angluin (1988). In this model, a learner repeatedly proposes hypotheses and, when a deployed hypothesis is inadequate, receives a counterexample. Under fully adversarial counterexample generation, however, the model can be overly pessimistic. In addition, most prior work assumes a \emph{full-information} setting, where the learner also observes the correct label of the counterexample, an assumption that is not always natural. We address these issues by restricting the environment to a broad class of less adversarial counterexample generators, which we call \emph{symmetric}. Informally, such generators choose counterexamples based only on the symmetric difference between the hypothesis and the target. This class captures natural mechanisms such as random counterexamples (Angluin and Dohrn, 2017; Bhatia, 2021; Chase, Freitag, and Reyzin, 2024), as well as generators that return the simplest counterexample according to a prescribed complexity measure. Within this framework, we study learning from equivalence queries under both full-information and bandit feedback. We obtain tight bounds on the number of learning rounds in both settings and highlight directions for future work. Our analysis combines a game-theoretic view of symmetric adversaries with adaptive weighting methods and minimax arguments.