https://arxiv.org/api/wE6cI+NlggEYEr4jL+TvcRtnXk82026-06-10T19:28:46Z1293331515http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.14243v2Graph Homomorphisms and Universal Algebra2026-04-25T08:40:16ZConstraint satisfaction problems are computational problems that naturally appear in many areas of theoretical computer science. One of the central themes is their computational complexity, and in particular the border between polynomial-time tractability and NP-hardness. In this course we introduce the universal-algebraic approach to study the computational complexity of finite-domain CSPs. The course covers in particular the cyclic terms and bounded width theorems. To keep the presentation accessible, we start the course in the tangible setting of directed graphs and graph homomorphism problems.2026-02-15T17:35:37ZIn version 2: Added chapter on uniform algorithms. Fixed issues in the bounded width proof. Added many exercises. Changed order of sections on Maltsev and on Universal AlgebraManuel Bodirskyhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2502.01400v2Fair Vertex Problems Parameterized by Cluster Vertex Deletion2026-04-24T23:08:06ZIn this paper we study fair variants of MSO$_1$ definable problems parameterized by cluster vertex deletion number, i.e., the smallest number of vertices required to be removed from the graph such that what remains is a collection of cliques. While typical graph problems seek the smallest set of vertices satisfying some property, their fair variants seek such a set that does not contain too many vertices in any neighborhood of any vertex. Formally, the task is to find a set $X\subseteq V(G)$ satisfying some MSO$_1$ definable property, whose fair cost is at most $k$, i.e., such that for all $v\in V(G)$ it holds that $|X\cap N(v)|\le k$. Recently, Knop, Masařík, and Toufar [MFCS 2019] showed that all fair MSO$_1$ definable problems can be solved in FPT time parameterized by the twin cover of a graph. They asked whether such a statement can be achieved for a more general parameterization by cluster vertex deletion number.
In this paper, we prove that in full generality this is not possible by demonstrating W[1]-hardness. On the other hand, we give a sufficient condition under which a fair MSO$_1$ definable problem admits an FPT algorithm parameterized by the cluster vertex deletion number. Our algorithm is general enough to capture the fair variant of many natural graph problems such as the Fair Feedback Vertex Set problem, the Fair Vertex Cover problem, the Fair Dominating Set problem, the Fair Odd Cycle Transversal problem, as well as connected variants thereof. Moreover, we solve the Fair $[σ,ρ]$-Domination problem for $σ$ finite, or when both $σ$ and $ρ$ are cofinite. That is, given finite or cofinite $ρ,σ\subseteq \mathbb{N}$, the task is to find set of vertices $X\subseteq V(G)$ of fair cost at most $k$ such that for all $v\in X$, $|N(v)\cap X| \inσ$ and for all $v\in V(G)\setminus X$, $|N(v)\cap X|\inρ$.2025-02-03T14:31:37Z26 pages, 3 figuresTomáš MasaříkJędrzej OlkowskiAnna Zych-Pawlewiczhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2604.22742v1Boolean PCSPs through the lens of Fourier Analysis2026-04-24T17:40:51ZWe develop an analytical framework for Boolean Promise Constraint Satisfaction Problems (PCSPs) that studies polymorphisms through the notion of influence from Fourier analysis of Boolean functions. Extending the work of Brakensiek, Guruswami, and Sandeep [ICALP'21] on Ordered PCSPs, we identify two general phenomena in Boolean minions indicative of hardness or tractability: (1) preservation of coordinate influence under random 2-to-1 minors and (2) the presence of sharp thresholds. We demonstrate that these phenomena occur in broader settings than previously established, yielding new hardness/tractability results for minions consisting of unate or polynomial threshold functions.2026-04-24T17:40:51ZDemian BanakhKatzper Michnohttp://arxiv.org/abs/2604.22627v1The Exact Replica Threshold for Nonlinear Moments of Quantum States2026-04-24T14:56:59ZJoint measurements on multiple copies of a quantum state provide access to nonlinear observables such as $\operatorname{tr}(ρ^t)$, but whether replica number marks a sharp information-theoretic resource boundary has remained unclear. For every fixed order $t\ge 3$, existing protocols show that $\lceil t/2\rceil$ replicas already suffice for polynomial-sample estimation of $\operatorname{tr}(ρ^t)$, yet it has remained open whether one fewer replica must necessarily incur a sample-complexity barrier growing with the dimension. We prove that this is indeed the case in the sample/copy-access model with replica-limited joint measurements: any protocol restricted to $\lceil t/2\rceil-1$ replicas requires dimension-growing sample complexity, while $\lceil t/2\rceil$ replicas suffice by prior work. Thus the exact replica threshold for fixed-order pure moments is $\lceil t/2\rceil$. Equivalently, for fixed-order pure moments, one additional coherent replica is not merely useful but marks the exact threshold between polynomial-sample estimation and a dimension-growing regime in the replica-limited model. We further show that the same threshold law extends to a broad family of observable-weighted moments $\operatorname{tr}(Oρ^t)$, including Pauli observables and other observables with bounded operator norm and macroscopic trace norm. Coherent replica number therefore acts as a genuinely discrete resource for nonlinear quantum-state estimation.2026-04-24T14:56:59ZShuai Zenghttp://arxiv.org/abs/2604.04656v2Subset Balancing and Generalized Subset Sum via Lattices2026-04-24T14:45:37ZWe study the Subset Balancing problem: given $x \in \mathbb{Z}^n$ and a coefficient set $C \subseteq \mathbb{Z}$, find a nonzero vector $c \in C^n$ such that $c\cdot x = 0$. The standard meet-in-the-middle algorithm runs in time $\tilde{O}(|C|^{n/2})$, and recent improvements (SODA 2022, Chen, Jin, Randolph, and Servedio; STOC 2026, Randolph and Węgrzycki) beyond this barrier apply mainly when $d$ is constant.
We give a reduction from Subset Balancing with $C = \{-d, \dots, d\}$ to a single instance of SVP$_{\infty}$ in dimension $n+1$. Instantiating this reduction with the best known $\ell_\infty$-SVP algorithms yields a deterministic $\tilde{O}((6\sqrt{2πe})^n)$-time algorithm and a randomized $\tilde{O}(2^{2.443n})$-time algorithm. The exponent depends only on $n$, improving on meet-in-the-middle for all $d\ge 15$. For sufficiently large $d$ we also obtain a polynomial-time algorithm. The reduction extends from the box constraint $[-d,d]^n$ to any centrally symmetric convex body $K\subseteq\mathbb{R}^n$, giving deterministic time $\tilde{O}(2^{c_K n})$ for a constant $c_K$ depending only on the shape of $K$.
We further study the Generalized Subset Sum problem of finding $c \in C^n$ such that $c \cdot x = τ$. For $C = \{-d, \dots, d\}$ or $C = \{-d,\dots,d\}\setminus\{0\}$, we reduce the worst-case problem to CVP$_{\infty}$ in dimension $n+1$. We observe that distances in our lattice take only integer values, so an approximate CVP$_{\infty}$ oracle still suffices, yielding a deterministic worst-case algorithm running in time $2^{O(n\log\log d)}$.
In the average-case setting, we demonstrate that for both coefficient sets the embedded CVP$_{\infty}$ instance satisfies a bounded-distance promise with high probability, removing the $\log\log d$ factor altogether and obtaining a deterministic algorithm running in time $\tilde{O}((18\sqrt{2πe})^n)$.2026-04-06T13:10:13ZYiming GaoYansong FengHonggang HuYanbin Panhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2604.19158v2Parity Tests with Ties2026-04-24T14:29:42ZWe extend the Ting--Yao randomized maximum-finding algorithm [TY94] to inputs that need not be pairwise distinct: each parity test $P(i,B)=\prod_{a\in B}(x_i-x_a):0$ on $B\subseteq[n]\setminus\{i\}$ is simulated by $O(\log |B|)$ ordinary polynomial tests, raising depth from $O((\log n)^2)$ to $O((\log n)^3)$ while preserving the $O(n^{-c})$ failure probability for every fixed $c>0$.2026-04-21T07:12:46ZRon Kupferhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2604.26972v1How Hard Is Continuous Clustering? Lower Bounds from the Existential Theory of the Reals2026-04-24T14:23:31ZThis paper studies the computational difficulty of clustering problems that are defined directly on a continuous probability density. Rather than working with finite samples, we assume the density is given as a polynomial and ask whether it contains certain cluster structures. Four natural questions are examined. First, do there exist several points with high density that are far apart from each other. Second, do two high density points have a midpoint with low density, creating a valley between them. Third, does the region where the density is above a threshold have at least a given number of separate connected pieces. Fourth, does that same region contain a hole, meaning a loop that cannot be shrunk to a point. We prove that the first two problems, separated points and valley detection, are exactly as hard as the existential theory of the reals, a complexity class that contains NP and is believed to be strictly larger. In contrast, the topological problems of counting connected pieces and detecting holes are at least as hard as the existential theory of the reals, but their exact complexity remains open. Placing them inside that class would need a major advance in real algebraic geometry. These results give the first rigorous classification of exact continuous clustering inside the real polynomial hierarchy. They also show that even basic clustering criteria are not NP complete unless unexpected collapses occur.2026-04-24T14:23:31ZAngshul Majumdarhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2604.22365v1Dynamic Planar Graph Isomorphism is in DynFO2026-04-24T08:56:24ZConsider two planar graphs which are subject to edge insertions and deletions. We show that whether the two graphs are isomorphic can be maintained with first-order logic formulas and auxiliary data of polynomial size. This places the dynamic planar graph isomorphism problem into the dynamic descriptive complexity class DynFO. As a consequence, there is a dynamic constant-time parallel algorithm with polynomial-size auxiliary data which maintains whether two dynamic planar graphs are isomorphic.2026-04-24T08:56:24ZFull version of a LICS 2026 paperSamir DattaAsif KhanFelix TschirbsNils VortmeierThomas Zeumehttp://arxiv.org/abs/2604.10873v2A Quantitative Definition of Intelligence2026-04-24T08:53:50ZWe propose an operational, quantitative definition of intelligence for arbitrary physical systems. The intelligence density of a system is the ratio of the logarithm of its independent outputs to its total description length. A system memorizes if its description length grows with its output count; it knows if its description length remains fixed while its output count diverges. The criterion for knowing is generalization. A system knows its domain if a single finite mechanism can produce correct outputs across an unbounded range of inputs, rather than storing each answer individually. The definition places intelligence on a substrate-independent continuum from logic gates to brains. We then argue that meaning over a domain is a selection and ordering of functions that produces correct outputs where correctness is specifiable. We also define a measure of contextuality of an output as the inverse of its conditional Kolmogorov complexity given the context of prior outputs, which unifies correctness and independence into a single condition. Together, these refute Searle's third premise, that syntax is insufficient for semantics, over any domain where correctness is specifiable.2026-04-13T00:46:56Z27 pages; v2: syntax is semanticsKang-Sin Choihttp://arxiv.org/abs/2508.00055v2Are controlled unitaries helpful?2026-04-23T23:44:25ZMany quantum algorithms, to compute some property of a unitary $U$, require access not just to $U$, but to $cU$, the unitary with a control qubit. We show that having access to $cU$ does not help for a large class of quantum problems. For a quantum circuit which uses $cU$ and $cU^\dagger$ and outputs $|ψ(U)\rangle$, we show how to "decontrol" the circuit into one which uses only $U$ and $U^\dagger$ and outputs $|ψ(\varphi U)\rangle$ for a uniformly random phase $\varphi$, with a small amount of time and space overhead. When we only care about the output state up to a global phase on $U$, then the decontrolled circuit suffices. Stated differently, $cU$ is only helpful because it contains global phase information about $U$.
A version of our procedure is described in an appendix of Sheridan, Maslov, and Mosca (arXiv:0810.3843). Our goal with this work is to popularize this result by generalizing it and investigating its implications, in order to counter negative results in the literature which might lead one to believe that decontrolling is not possible. As an application, we give a simple proof for the existence of unitary ensembles which are pseudorandom under access to $U$, $U^\dagger$, $cU$, and $cU^\dagger$.2025-07-31T18:00:01Z18 pages; v2 fixing typosEwin TangJohn Wrighthttp://arxiv.org/abs/2507.23787v2Amplitude amplification and estimation require inverses2026-04-23T23:29:53ZWe prove that the generic quantum speedups for brute-force search and counting only hold when the process we apply them to can be efficiently inverted. The algorithms speeding up these problems, amplitude amplification and amplitude estimation, assume the ability to apply a state preparation unitary $U$ and its inverse $U^\dagger$; we give problem instances based on trace estimation where no algorithm which uses only $U$ beats the naive, quadratically slower approach. Our proof of this is simple and goes through the compressed oracle method introduced by Zhandry. Since these two subroutines are responsible for the ubiquity of the quadratic "Grover" speedup in quantum algorithms, our result explains why such speedups are far harder to come by in the settings of quantum learning, metrology, and sensing. In these settings, $U$ models the evolution of an experimental system, so implementing $U^\dagger$ can be much harder -- tantamount to reversing time within the system. Our result suggests a dichotomy: without inverse access, quantum speedups are scarce; with it, quantum speedups abound.2025-07-31T17:59:59Z20 pages; v2 fixed typosEwin TangJohn Wrighthttp://arxiv.org/abs/2605.27400v1Mathematical Modelling of Ethical AI Use in Higher Education: A Coordination Game Framework for Future-Facing Learning2026-04-23T21:21:14ZThe rapid uptake of generative artificial intelligence (AI) in higher education is reshaping assessment practices and intensifying concerns around academic integrity, fairness, and learning quality. While institutional responses increasingly emphasise policy guidance and ethical principles, there remains limited formal understanding of how collective norms of responsible or opportunistic AI use emerge and stabilise within student cohorts. This paper reframes student AI use in assessment as a coordination problem shaped by peer expectations and assessment design rather than individual compliance alone. We develop a coordination-based evolutionary game-theoretic framework that captures learning value, effort, perceived fairness, and transparency, with institutional AI governance modelled implicitly through reflective assessment incentives.
We use analytical results and finite-population simulations to reveal threshold-driven behavioural transitions in student AI use: small, well-calibrated changes in reflective assessment incentives can trigger rapid shifts towards responsible, learning-oriented AI-use norms, whereas weak or misaligned incentives allow opportunistic practices to persist. These non-linear dynamics explain why policy statements alone often fail to change behaviour, while modest assessment redesigns can have disproportionate effects. By providing a mechanism-level account of how assessment structures shape collective AI-use practices, this work offers higher education institutions an analytically grounded tool for Future Facing Learning, supporting proportionate, pedagogy-led AI governance without reliance on surveillance or punitive enforcement.2026-04-23T21:21:14ZNdidi Bianca OgboZhao SongShatha GhareebThe Anh Hanhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2604.22052v1Turnstile Streaming Algorithms Might (Still) as Well Be Linear Sketches, for Polynomial-Length Streams2026-04-23T20:13:47ZA fundamental question in streaming complexity is whether every space-efficient turnstile algorithm is implicitly a linear sketch. The landmark work of Li, Nguyen, and Woodruff [LNW14] established an equivalence between the two, but their reduction requires a stream length that is at least doubly exponential in the dimension $n$. In the opposite direction, results by Kallaugher and Price [KP20] demonstrate a separation for streams of linear length, showing that the equivalence does not hold in general. The most natural and practically relevant regime -- polynomial-length streams -- has therefore remained open.
We show that polynomial-length turnstile algorithms admit linear-sketch simulations. More precisely, if a turnstile algorithm uses $S$ bits of space and succeeds on all streams of length $\mathrm{poly}(D, n)$, then on final vectors $x$ with $\|x\|_2 \le D$, its output can be recovered from $O(S)$ linear measurements of $x$, using $O(S \log S)$ bits overall. For smooth problems under appropriate input distributions, a mollified version of the reduction yields a bounded-entry sketch with $O(S / \log D)$ measurements and optimal $O(S)$ total space. Our results extend to strict turnstile streams and non-uniform Read-Once Branching Programs (ROBPs).
Our proof departs from prior transition-graph based machinery, relying instead on a Fourier-analytic framework and tools from additive combinatorics to extract discrete linear measurements. Our analysis shows that any $S$-bit algorithm can only be sensitive to a low-dimensional lattice of heavy Fourier frequencies, which we then use to construct the rows of the sketching matrix. Consequently, we obtain new lower bounds for polynomial-length streams via existing real sketching and communication lower bounds.2026-04-23T20:13:47Z87 pagesCheng JiangYinchen LiuHuacheng Yuhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2604.22006v1Polynomial Lower Bounds for Arithmetic Circuits over Non-Commutative Rings2026-04-23T18:50:02ZWe prove a lower bound of $Ω\left(n^{1.5}\right)$ for the number of product gates in non-commutative arithmetic circuits for an explicit $n$-variate degree-$n$ polynomial $f_{n}$ (over every field).
We observe that this implies that over certain non-commutative rings $R$, any arithmetic circuit that computes the induced polynomial function $f_{n}: R^n \rightarrow R$, using the ring operations of addition and multiplication in $R$, requires at least $Ω\left(n^{1.5}\right)$ multiplications.
More generally, for any $d\geq 2$ and sufficiently large $n$, we obtain a lower bound of $Ω\left(d\sqrt{n}\right)$ for $n$-variate degree-$d$ polynomials, for both these models.
Prior to our work, the only known lower bounds for the size of non-commutative circuits, or for the size of arithmetic circuits over any ring, were slightly super-linear in $\max\{n,d\}$: $Ω\left(n\log d\right)$ by Baur and Strassen, and $Ω\left(d\log n\right)$ by Nisan. (Nisan's bound was proved for non-commutative arithmetic circuits and implies a bound for arithmetic circuits over non-commutative rings by our observation).2026-04-23T18:50:02ZRan Razhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2512.19156v3Classical billiards can compute2026-04-23T17:07:22ZWe show that two-dimensional billiard systems are Turing complete, in the sense that the halting of any Turing machine with a given input is equivalent to a certain bounded trajectory in this system entering a specified open set. Billiards serve as idealized models of particle motion with elastic reflections and arise naturally as limits of smooth Hamiltonian systems under steep confining potentials. Our results establish the existence of undecidable trajectories in physically natural billiard-type models, including billiard-type models arising in hard-sphere gases and in collision-chain limits of celestial mechanics.2025-12-22T08:52:50Z17 pages, 7 figures. Appendix added. The results of the paper have been streamlined and strengthenedEva MirandaIsaac Ramos